Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk  (Read 720 times)

Offline NewMine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« on: June 15, 2015, 07:30:11 PM »

Why in the hell would anyone lock those threads?

This is why I go to bitcointalk to post this stuff. Or you can let the discussion continue here.

Offline onceuponatime

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2015, 07:33:55 PM »

This thread should be locked too.

There is now consolidation into one new thread:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16953.0.html

Offline NewMine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2015, 07:43:57 PM »
BitShares greed 2.0 post coming soon on Bitcointalk.

Offline bytemaster

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2015, 07:49:12 PM »
BitShares greed 2.0 post coming soon on Bitcointalk.

Only person greedy around here is you newmine.    Everything the BitShares team has done has been given away as public domain even though every single person working on it received below market wages the entire time.   
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline klosure

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
    • View Profile
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2015, 07:54:12 PM »
Why in the hell would anyone lock those threads?

Questionning if we want to adopt Graphene is not allowed.
Bytemaster already decided that we must adopt Graphene and become Cryptonomex' bitch.
If that doesn't prove my point, I don't know what does.
Wake up people.

Offline Riverhead

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2015, 07:59:35 PM »
Why in the hell would anyone lock those threads?

Questionning if we want to adopt Graphene is not allowed.
Bytemaster already decided that we must adopt Graphene and become Cryptonomex' bitch.
If that doesn't prove my point, I don't know what does.
Wake up people.

The thread was locked and consolidated which is much different than being deleted. It's all still there for anyone to read or post in the consolidated thread. Klosure you have demonstrated yourself to be well versed in the legalities and have fielded the slings and arrows in your Wake Up thread with facts and composure. Please don't play the victim now.
BTC/MUSE Bridge! Buy REAL MUSE!  https://metaexchange.info/markets/MUSE/BTC

Offline fav

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3393
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
    • BitShares 2.0 SmartCoin
  • BTS: fav
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2015, 08:01:31 PM »
This is why I go to bitcointalk to post this stuff. Or you can let the discussion continue here.

well, good bye and good luck. hope bitcointalk is a better place for you :)

btw, threatening to open a bitcointalk thread? do you expect anyone to be shocked now?


Offline cass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4321
  • /(┬.┬)\
    • View Profile
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2015, 08:09:19 PM »
Could we please calm down and working together to get the best solution out for all involved parties! Pls do me this favour...

Quote
Klosure you have demonstrated yourself to be well versed in the legalities

indeed +5%
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█

Offline cass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4321
  • /(┬.┬)\
    • View Profile
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2015, 08:10:07 PM »
This is why I go to bitcointalk to post this stuff. Or you can let the discussion continue here.

well, good bye and good luck. hope bitcointalk is a better place for you :)

btw, threatening to open a bitcointalk thread? do you expect anyone to be shocked now?



this doesn't help here...
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█

Offline Ben Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
  • Integrity & Innovation, powered by Bitshares
    • View Profile
  • BTS: benjojo
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2015, 08:12:33 PM »
Newmine & klosure, you both assume your interpretation of the situation is correct. The community has had a chance to digested the discussion you've worked hard to frame. Bravo. It would be great if you could at least try to see this situation from a different perspective.

I've listened to your arguments and I fail to see greed or impropriety.

Offline BunkerChain Labs

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2015, 08:19:17 PM »
BitShares greed 2.0 post coming soon on Bitcointalk.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
www.Peerplays.com | World's First Decentralized Tournament Platform Built Entirely on the Blockchain!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Offline NewMine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2015, 09:41:35 PM »
Newmine & klosure, you both assume your interpretation of the situation is correct. The community has had a chance to digested the discussion you've worked hard to frame. Bravo. It would be great if you could at least try to see this situation from a different perspective.

I've listened to your arguments and I fail to see greed or impropriety.
when and where have I assumed anything? I am only asking questions, like wtf is cryptonomex?

Offline Pheonike

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2015, 09:57:31 PM »
"It looks like we funded the BitShares team to develop a proprietary toolkit software where all profits from this will not benefit the BTS holder but in fact destroy them?"

This sounds like an assumption to me.

Offline Riverhead

Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2015, 10:04:06 PM »
"It looks like we funded the BitShares team to develop a proprietary toolkit software where all profits from this will not benefit the BTS holder but in fact destroy them?"

This sounds like an assumption to me.
Don't you watch the news? Put a question mark at the end and you say anything with impunity 8)
BTC/MUSE Bridge! Buy REAL MUSE!  https://metaexchange.info/markets/MUSE/BTC

Offline Ben Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
  • Integrity & Innovation, powered by Bitshares
    • View Profile
  • BTS: benjojo
Re: I guess I am going to have to go to BitcoinTalk
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2015, 10:05:54 PM »
Newmine & klosure, you both assume your interpretation of the situation is correct. The community has had a chance to digested the discussion you've worked hard to frame. Bravo. It would be great if you could at least try to see this situation from a different perspective.

I've listened to your arguments and I fail to see greed or impropriety.
when and where have I assumed anything? I am only asking questions, like wtf is cryptonomex?

BitShares greed 2.0 post coming soon on Bitcointalk.
You state here quite clearly that you believe the the motivation for forming Cryptonomex and the decisions around how Graphene will be deployed is the result of greed. That is an assumption because you have no empirical evidence for that, just suspicion. I've got no problem with you asking the questions, I just wish you could re-evaluate your perspective. Ok, so you are still not convinced as I am, fair enough. But assuming everything is the result of greed when BM has tried to explain the position the devs are in is not constructive and is unnecessarily discourteous.

 

Google+