[ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining, CPU mining ★

Trokhon · January 08, 2014, 06:43:40 AM

where can I find new version? 1 post isnt that the old one?

teenagecheese · January 08, 2014, 03:39:04 AM

Reporting maybe .4 hpm increase with new miner on R9 290. Thanks for putting these out.

Edit: ...and getting coil whine now too. Is that bad for the GPU, should I switch back to the old miner?

phrozenspite · January 07, 2014, 10:58:35 PM

trying it now. i might be seeing about a .5 hpm increase on my 7970, but i think desktop interactivity while mining has increased lol

reorder · January 07, 2014, 10:04:18 PM

Guys,

We have finally updated the miner. It has a slightly better HPM than previous version and tries to run on Nvidia.

Please report your success (or lack of) running it.

Drew · January 06, 2014, 08:07:15 PM

Awesome! Can't wait to try new miner. I have an Nvidia 680 I can see if it is worth mining on. Will the new miner work on a 6990 with 2gb of memory? All I get are rejects, but it thinks it is supported currently. Thanks for all your efforts on this!

reorder · January 06, 2014, 07:16:22 PM

Quote from: Armchair Miner on January 06, 2014, 06:41:18 PM
What might be the cause of increasing rates of rejects, it usually gets worse later, like this:

mmc-miner.exe MDxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8
Skipping device 1 (Pitcairn
): GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE 1073741824 < required 2147483648
Skipping device 2 ( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
): not a GPU
Mon Jan 06 08:32:56 2014 Miner Starts - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
MC2Hasher:0 initialized on device: Tahiti
type: 4, vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. , mem: 322122
5472 with 1-pass algo
Mon Jan 06 08:33:02 2014 Worker 0 hpm 16.124698 wpm 16.124698 A/R/T 1/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:18 2014 Worker 0 hpm 15.115635 wpm 18.138762 A/R/T 2/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 18.336007 wpm 18.336007 A/R/T 3/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:27 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.412329 wpm 18.371096 A/R/T 3/1/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:31 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.233606 wpm 18.394187 A/R/T 4/1/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:40 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.685382 wpm 18.431873 A/R/T 5/1/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:53 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.913477 wpm 18.478596 A/R/T 5/2/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:56 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.622452 wpm 18.487136 A/R/T 5/3/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:57 2014 Worker 0 hpm 24.563319 wpm 18.422489 A/R/T 5/4/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:03 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.103937 wpm 18.483150 A/R/T 5/5/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:09 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.533367 wpm 18.490503 A/R/T 5/6/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.125546 wpm 18.500437 A/R/T 5/7/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.830878 wpm 18.449712 A/R/T 6/7/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:34:19 2014 Worker 0 hpm 25.155682 wpm 18.496825 A/R/T 6/8/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:35 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.146350 wpm 18.455292 A/R/T 6/9/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:48 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.418779 wpm 18.517174 A/R/T 6/10/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:51 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.280423 wpm 18.518519 A/R/T 6/11/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.930554 wpm 18.520832 A/R/T 7/11/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.336024 wpm 18.492698 A/R/T 7/12/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.022056 wpm 18.499866 A/R/T 7/13/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:30 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.868558 wpm 18.531418 A/R/T 8/13/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:36 2014 Miner Stops - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
Terminate batch job (Y/N)?

Either they are stales, or the card gives hardware errors. New version of miner will print reject reason for rejected shares.

Armchair Miner · January 06, 2014, 06:41:18 PM

What might be the cause of increasing rates of rejects, it usually gets worse later, like this:

mmc-miner.exe MDxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8
Skipping device 1 (Pitcairn
): GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE 1073741824 < required 2147483648
Skipping device 2 ( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
): not a GPU
Mon Jan 06 08:32:56 2014 Miner Starts - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
MC2Hasher:0 initialized on device: Tahiti
type: 4, vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. , mem: 322122
5472 with 1-pass algo
Mon Jan 06 08:33:02 2014 Worker 0 hpm 16.124698 wpm 16.124698 A/R/T 1/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:18 2014 Worker 0 hpm 15.115635 wpm 18.138762 A/R/T 2/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 18.336007 wpm 18.336007 A/R/T 3/0/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:27 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.412329 wpm 18.371096 A/R/T 3/1/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:31 2014 Worker 0 hpm 20.233606 wpm 18.394187 A/R/T 4/1/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:40 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.685382 wpm 18.431873 A/R/T 5/1/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:33:53 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.913477 wpm 18.478596 A/R/T 5/2/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:56 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.622452 wpm 18.487136 A/R/T 5/3/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:33:57 2014 Worker 0 hpm 24.563319 wpm 18.422489 A/R/T 5/4/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:03 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.103937 wpm 18.483150 A/R/T 5/5/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:09 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.533367 wpm 18.490503 A/R/T 5/6/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.125546 wpm 18.500437 A/R/T 5/7/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:16 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.830878 wpm 18.449712 A/R/T 6/7/0 -> RPC
result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:34:19 2014 Worker 0 hpm 25.155682 wpm 18.496825 A/R/T 6/8/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:35 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.146350 wpm 18.455292 A/R/T 6/9/0 -> RPC
result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:48 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.418779 wpm 18.517174 A/R/T 6/10/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:34:51 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.280423 wpm 18.518519 A/R/T 6/11/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.930554 wpm 18.520832 A/R/T 7/11/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:14 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.336024 wpm 18.492698 A/R/T 7/12/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:24 2014 Worker 0 hpm 23.022056 wpm 18.499866 A/R/T 7/13/0 -> RP
C result: Rejected
Mon Jan 06 08:35:30 2014 Worker 0 hpm 22.868558 wpm 18.531418 A/R/T 8/13/0 -> RP
C result: Accepted
Mon Jan 06 08:35:36 2014 Miner Stops - mmcpool.1gh.com:8080
Terminate batch job (Y/N)?

billgeo · January 06, 2014, 02:13:33 PM

Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on January 06, 2014, 07:12:39 AM
I'm down to beta test a GPU miner for HD 6970 2GB.

Currently the miner produces only rejected shares with a 5xxx / 6xxx card.
If reorder will be kind enough to develop a fix for the current miner it will be great!
A lot of us will not only beta test it but actively use it!!! :D

(meanwile I am waiting for my 7970s to arrive...)

phrozenspite · January 06, 2014, 02:09:43 PM

awesome keep up the good work

TiGei99 · January 06, 2014, 02:02:26 PM

Quote from: reorder on January 06, 2014, 01:55:12 PM
A slightly optimized (~5%) and supporting Nvidia (maybe, tested only on AWS) miner version is on its way. ETA is several hours to a day. I will post an update when it is ready for download.

Nice news 8)

reorder · January 06, 2014, 01:55:12 PM

A slightly optimized (~5%) and supporting Nvidia (maybe, tested only on AWS) miner version is on its way. ETA is several hours to a day. I will post an update when it is ready for download.

chida · January 06, 2014, 01:48:15 PM

Quote from: reorder on January 05, 2014, 03:51:16 PM
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.

I'd love to do a tester

reorder · January 06, 2014, 09:14:32 AM

Quote from: TiGei99 on January 06, 2014, 09:12:36 AM
Quote from: reorder on January 05, 2014, 03:51:16 PM
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.
Do you use CUDA or OpenCL?

OpenCL for the moment. It is calculation-bound though, CUDA would not make much difference.

TiGei99 · January 06, 2014, 09:12:36 AM

Quote from: reorder on January 05, 2014, 03:51:16 PM
Guys,

I have now a build of GPU miner that works with Nvidia. Its performance is rather disappointing, though: AWS g2.2xlarge (GRID K520) yields just 3.58hpm. It cannot be significantly improved upon. Consumer-grade cards would yield a similar or worse performace. Given that, please give your opinion on whether you would be using such a miner.

Do you use CUDA or OpenCL?

darkEyexp · January 06, 2014, 07:27:00 AM

Quote from: reorder on January 05, 2014, 09:43:38 AM
Quote from: darkEyexp on January 05, 2014, 05:37:07 AM
Quote from: phrozenspite on January 05, 2014, 01:19:52 AM
Quote from: darkEyexp on January 05, 2014, 12:43:29 AM
someone please explain me why are a huge different in performance between 7950 and 7970??
with my 7950 got 10 hpm >>> scrypt mining 650
with my 7970 got 19 hpm >>> scrypt mining 600

why is so bad the performance of the 7950??
Thanks
the 7970 should be faster in scrypt as well. 7970 is just more powerful in about every way

7870 gets almost 10 and my 7950 gets the same.. do you think the 2 gpu are the same?
The 7870 that does 10hpm is gigaherz edition, 7950 runs cores at 800MHz. This compensates for the difference in number of shaders.

my 7950 is oced to 1050 / 1400.. i think there is a bug or anything with 7950..