CCEDK, you should copy Poloniex's interface and features!

[fav]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

Hope it is a surprise!

You might want to take a look at my linkedin blog to get an idea of how the future CCEDK Bitshares wallet will look like :) ;)

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/openledger-most-powerful-crypto-financial-platform-world-boesing?published=u

what a great post!

Is openledger offering the affiliate to marketers? If you do, how much revenue do you share?

ty

this part of sharing revenue is why i am creating slack and hangout for Openledger within coming days as I am unsure exactly i which way to create an offer just making anyone thing they have to participate, but still making it worthwhile from my own side to put in all the work.

depends. 80% for me as marketer, 20% for openledger (+potential new customer for CCEDK) sounds okay in my opinion.

I wonder when we get more details on the affiliate system, it's still in dev.

[openledger]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

Hope it is a surprise!

You might want to take a look at my linkedin blog to get an idea of how the future CCEDK Bitshares wallet will look like :) ;)

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/openledger-most-powerful-crypto-financial-platform-world-boesing?published=u

what a great post!

Is openledger offering the affiliate to marketers? If you do, how much revenue do you share?

ty

this part of sharing revenue is why i am creating slack and hangout for Openledger within coming days as I am unsure exactly i which way to create an offer just making anyone thing they have to participate, but still making it worthwhile from my own side to put in all the work.

[fav]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

Hope it is a surprise!

You might want to take a look at my linkedin blog to get an idea of how the future CCEDK Bitshares wallet will look like :) ;)

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/openledger-most-powerful-crypto-financial-platform-world-boesing?published=u

what a great post!

Is openledger offering the affiliate to marketers? If you do, how much revenue do you share?

[openledger]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

Hope it is a surprise!

You might want to take a look at my linkedin blog to get an idea of how the future CCEDK Bitshares wallet will look like :) ;)

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/openledger-most-powerful-crypto-financial-platform-world-boesing?published=u

[liondani]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

Hope it is a surprise!

[speedy]

Has CCEDK given any info about how their interface will look post 2.0 & after integrating with Graphene?

[jakub]

Why copy when they can do better  :P

Copying the front end while using Bitshares as the back end WOULD be doing better.

Definitely, if you could combine Poloniex interface with BitShares backend - that would be amazing.
I agree, the current CCEDK interface is quite terrible and probably one of the main reasons there is such low volume there.
Good marketing efforts on Ronney's part but bad UX ruins everything. 

[xeroc]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

Oh yes, this is missing from BTS as well, but I think that was partly due to the stupid 'you get what you ask for and the rest is burned' plan which didnt work and probably drove away some traders.

Hopefully we get this functionality in BTS 2.0 as well.

Was even easier than expected.. https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/commit/eb98d6c82330b3621fa88f6b7a1969bb87a51288

Yes, thank you!!

+1

[tbone]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

Oh yes, this is missing from BTS as well, but I think that was partly due to the stupid 'you get what you ask for and the rest is burned' plan which didnt work and probably drove away some traders.

Hopefully we get this functionality in BTS 2.0 as well.

Was even easier than expected.. https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/commit/eb98d6c82330b3621fa88f6b7a1969bb87a51288

+5% +5%

[Ander]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

Oh yes, this is missing from BTS as well, but I think that was partly due to the stupid 'you get what you ask for and the rest is burned' plan which didnt work and probably drove away some traders.

Hopefully we get this functionality in BTS 2.0 as well.

Was even easier than expected.. https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/commit/eb98d6c82330b3621fa88f6b7a1969bb87a51288

Yes, thank you!!

[svk]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

Oh yes, this is missing from BTS as well, but I think that was partly due to the stupid 'you get what you ask for and the rest is burned' plan which didnt work and probably drove away some traders.

Hopefully we get this functionality in BTS 2.0 as well.

Was even easier than expected.. https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/commit/eb98d6c82330b3621fa88f6b7a1969bb87a51288

[Ander]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

Oh yes, this is missing from BTS as well, but I think that was partly due to the stupid 'you get what you ask for and the rest is burned' plan which didnt work and probably drove away some traders.

Hopefully we get this functionality in BTS 2.0 as well.

[kenCode]

I really like the UI and UX of Coinigy.

[svk]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.

I've never actually noticed an exchange having this functionality but I like it and it's definitely something we could add, I'll have a look this weekend.

[tbone]

I agree with the sentiments posted re: the Poloniex interface.  Poloniex has done a great job.  It's not perfect, but it is hands down the best interface I've seen.  One feature in particular that @Ander mentioned is especially important.  And that has to do with the order book.  As Ander mentioned,  it is imperative that when you click on a price in the order book, let's say on the ask side, it populates the quantity field of the order form with the total number of coins up to that price, not just the number of coins available at that price alone.  This may seem trivial to some, but I assure you it is not.  We need to make sure we get this right in the new webwallet.  The current web wallet is lacking in this way.