Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison  (Read 12243 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gekko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Lunch is for wimps........ Greed is good.
    • View Profile
yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« on: January 03, 2014, 02:29:17 PM »

As performance information is cluttered through various threads I would like to use this one to specifically talk about the performance of yvg1900's miners (e.g. "yam" from https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g ) for ProtoShares.

I'd like to know your miner setup and how you optimize your miners to get the best possible performance.
This thread is not meant for support or install questions. It should just give an overview of mining speeds / optimal miner configurations.

My current setup:

CPU: Intel i7-4770 (Quad-Core Haswell) 3.40GHz
RAM: 32 GB DDR3 RAM
OS: Ubuntu 13.10 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-linux64-haswell

PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 325 (AV=12 after AV-optimization)
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 336 (AV=31 after AV-optimization)
PTS Agg. CPM (2048 MB): 318 (AV=13  after AV-optimization)

I'm running with "&donation-interval=100".
« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 03:58:56 PM by Gekko »

Offline markieta

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2014, 07:46:49 AM »
CPU: Intel i5-3570k (Dual-Core Ivy Bridge) 3.40GHz (OC 4.70GHz)
RAM: 16 GB DDR3 RAM
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-ivy-bridge

PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 290 (AV=1 after AV-optimization)
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 320 (AV=3 after AV-optimization)

Offline abra

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 04:53:31 AM »
Can someone please link me to a miner for 32 bit Ubuntu? 12.04 LTS

Offline ro79dc20d

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2014, 02:52:36 AM »
CPU: Intel i7-4770K  3.5GHz (OC 4.5GHz) (4 cores)
RAM: 16 GB DDR3-1866 RAM
OS: Windows 8.1 (64bit) Huge page support enabled
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-Haswell

PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 340 (AV=13 after AV-optimization)
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 350 (AV=5 after AV-optimization)

CPU: Intel Xeon X5560  2.8 GHz (OC 3.5GHz) (4 cores)
RAM: 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
OS: Windows 8 (64bit) Huge page support enabled
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-nehalem

PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 240 (AV=30 after AV-optimization)

CPU: Intel Xeon X5660  2.8 GHz (6 cores)
RAM: 96 GB DDR3-1333 ECC  RAM
OS: Windows 2012 (64bit) Huge page support enabled
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-nehalem

PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 290 (AV=13 after AV-optimization)

Offline Komik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2014, 03:07:23 AM »
CPU: AMD FX-8350 8-core 4.2GHz (OC 4.80GHz)
RAM: 16 GB DDR3 RAM 2133 Mhz
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-bdver1

PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): ~ 395-402 (AV=1)
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 386-390 (AV=2)

Offline gorgorom

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2014, 11:20:56 PM »
Holy crap, I cant get the yam miner to work. Im trying to uise the config file but this is what I get
Code: [Select]
C:\Users\Gor\Desktop\yam\win64-ivy-bridge>yam.exe --config yam.cfg
YAM - Yet Another Miner by yvg1900
yam M7i-win64-ivy-bridge/yvg1900
***************************************************
* Supported coins: PTS                            *
* Author: yvg1900 (Twitter @yvg1900)              *
* XPT protocol: jh (http://ypool.net)             *
*                                                 *
* Addresses for Thanks and Donations:             *
*   PTS: PZxsEQoiMeB6tHcW2ZySBEiCPio1WkxbEL       *
*   XPM: AW2388DEWNEfMH4rP9kcj9yKcMq1QywYT4       *
*   DTC: D6PmUogMigWvXurgFTqm5VLxQeVpXdYQj3       *
*   LTC: Lby4YjhcAxhmbsdHFb4nYydrwGoiJezZt1       *
*   BTC: 1FxekeK5La7AuF3oxiLzPKnjXyLMrux6VT       *
*   NMC: N9KXqmzEqP7gB2dGHpEZiRMgFjUHNM38FR       *
***************************************************
Checking PTS optimizations compatibility...
OK: PTS optimizations are compatible
Error: Can not enable [SeLockMemoryPrivilege] privilege, error=1300
Warning: Huge Pages not available, performance may degrade

Error: At least one mining target shall be defined with --mine parameter

C:\Users\Gor\Desktop\yam\win64-ivy-bridge>

Any help is much appreciated :)

Im trying to mine on my ivy bridge i3. Thanks!

Offline Gekko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Lunch is for wimps........ Greed is good.
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2014, 11:50:16 PM »
Holy crap, abra and gorgorom, which part of "This thread is not meant for support or install questions." didn't you understand?

Offline abra

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2014, 10:37:06 AM »
Holy crap, abra and gorgorom, which part of "This thread is not meant for support or install questions." didn't you understand?

Oops, apologize for that, you may delete my posts.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2014, 07:24:28 AM »
CPU: Intel i7-3770K (Quad-Core Ivy Bridge) 3.40GHz
RAM: 16 GB DDR3 RAM
OS: Windows 8 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-ivy-bridge
Threads:7
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 345 (AV=9 after AV-optimization)

Offline r0oter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2014, 07:02:37 PM »
CPU: Intel i7-3720QM (Quad-Core) 2.60GHz
RAM: 16 GB DDR3 RAM
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-ivy-bridge
Threads:7
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 250 (AV=8 after AV-optimization)

CPU: Core2 Duo Processor E7500 (Dual-Core) 2.93GHz
RAM: 2 GB DDR3 RAM
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-core2
Threads:2
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 55-60 (AV=14 after AV-optimization)
« Last Edit: January 16, 2014, 07:06:58 PM by r0oter »

Offline Brekyrself

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2014, 08:02:40 PM »
CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.52ghz
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 RAM @ 1760mhz
OS: Windows Vista (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-Nehalem
Threads:11
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 355 (AV=21 after AV-optimization)

Can get more CPM with more threads however it starts to slow down gpu mining on the same machine.

Offline pvp1982

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2014, 08:04:52 PM »
CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.52ghz
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 RAM @ 1760mhz
OS: Windows Vista (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-Nehalem
Threads:11
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 355 (AV=21 after AV-optimization)

Can get more CPM with more threads however it starts to slow down gpu mining on the same machine.

wow, how is your L5639 running at 3.52 Ghz?


Offline Brekyrself

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2014, 08:29:59 PM »
CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.52ghz
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 RAM @ 1760mhz
OS: Windows Vista (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7j-win64-Nehalem
Threads:11
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 355 (AV=21 after AV-optimization)

Can get more CPM with more threads however it starts to slow down gpu mining on the same machine.

wow, how is your L5639 running at 3.52 Ghz?



Overclocked with 220 bclk.  L5639 is an interesting chip:

1-2 cores loaded = 20x multiplier = 4.4ghz
3-4 cores loaded = 18x multiplier = 3.96ghz
5-6 cores loaded = 16x multiplier = 3.52ghz

Offline Brekyrself

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2014, 07:52:18 PM »
Downloaded the new K version of the miner and made some tweaks.

CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.96ghz
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 RAM @ 2200mhz 9-9-9-28-1t
OS: Windows Vista (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7k-win64-Nehalem
Threads:11
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 402 (AV=21 after AV-optimization)

Offline Brekyrself

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
    • View Profile
Re: yam (yvg1900) miner performance comparison
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2014, 05:33:48 AM »
Downloaded the new M version of the miner, nice speed improvement!

Rig 1:
CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.96ghz
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 RAM @ 2200mhz 9-9-9-27-1t
OS: Windows Vista (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7m-win64-Nehalem
Threads:11
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 482 (AV=4 after AV-optimization)

Rig 2:
CPU: Intel Xeon L5639 @ 3.96ghz
RAM: 6 GB DDR3 RAM @ 1320mhz 8-8-8-24-1t
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7m-win64-Nehalem
Threads:7
PTS Agg. CPM (512 MB): 380 (AV=4 after AV-optimization)

 

Google+