MUSE blockchain information site

[btswolf]

jikol | Sunday, Jan. 24th | View on www.cointelegraph.com
lol if there was a working software to jump on... the webpage is a joke and people will be laughing when they try to join peertracks

Sad, but I guess that`s the average impression of potential investors.

[Erlich Bachman]

you ask permission "of" anyone not "to" anyone down in the black text on white background section  with the pillars

its still there, in the "sturdy foundation section"

[cob]

Changes coming soon.

And yeah, we can always turn it over to the community. Workers are one thing that make Graphene awesome afterall

[donkeypong]

CCEDK is where I heard they would be. But I've looked and haven't yet seen any MUSE on there.

[Empirical1.2]

Are they purchasable on CCEDK? What are they listed as?

[liondani]

ugly website

[Tuck Fheman]

i vote to spend the dev fund on hookers and blow for MUSE holders!

[ghost_of_the_internet]

Can I vote to use some of this 500 million to redo the website?

[lzr1900]

ugly website

[testz]

can you PLEASE change the logo?

The webpage looks horrible :(

+5% web site looks too heavy  :(

[Marky0001]

can you PLEASE change the logo?

The webpage looks horrible :(

[cube]

A little history and perspective to the rescue!

Invictus Innovations said anyone could use their tech as long as they sharedropped 10% to PTS holders and 10% to AGS holders. Leaving 80% of the chain to PeerTracks.
PeerTracks inc. would allocate that 80% as they saw fit, x% to pre-sale of Notes, y% to this, z% to that.

If you recall, that was the original proposal, which got shot down quite quickly.


We replaced that "centralized beginning model" with something that harnesses the power of DPOS and we all agreed it was much fairer:
Just 10% to PeerTracks but allow dilution, which would be in the control of ALL stakeholders, not just PeerTracks.

This made everyone happy since, it removed centralization, and put the funding and development into the hands of everyone instead of just one corporation (PeerTracks). It also did not guarantee there would ever even be a need to dilute, unlike the original proposal.

So until Graphene there were 1.5 billion MUSE Core Units with infinite stakeholder-approved dilution.

The only thing that changed with Graphene is that we have put a CAP on dilution to a nice round number 500 million, making TOTAL possible MUSE Core Units to be 2 billion.

So what we basically did is go from infinite possible dilution to a hard coded max possible dilution of 25%. Your welcome.

And once again, don't like the reserve fund? Vote to burn it all!


So to clarify!

The 500 million Reserve Fund is not in the hands of PeerTracks inc.
It's in the hand of the stake holders. It's the MUSE blockchain's own reserves.

The PeerTracks Stake is 10% of the original 1.5 Billion. Some 150 Million Shares NOT the 500 million reserve fund that might never even see the light of day before workers burn it all haha.

Thank you cob.  You have always been transparent and responsive to the concerns of the minority shareholders.   +5%

[twitter]

sounds good Cob. you have been very kind/generous to BTS community.  +5%

[muse-umum]

Good idea. I like it. Just do it!

Well done Cob, you finally get the secret weapon from bytemaster.

Inflation and dilution is the only way of taking muse to success. I sold most of my notes at the price of around 0.02~0.008 CNY each , now I think I can buy them back at 0.001 CNY. The great profit really excites me!

Love you, Cob. :-* :-* :-*

[donkeypong]

don't like the reserve fund? Vote to burn it all

fuck you cob!

You must not have read the last half of this thread. No more foul language is needed. But you still have your fingers if you need them for gestures.  ;)