Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: Proxy: xeroc  (Read 4696 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Proxy: xeroc
« on: December 28, 2015, 07:30:12 AM »

Hey friends and shareholders,

since it happened to me to be a proxy, I would like to keep you informed about proxy decisions in this thread.

For those that have net set me as their proxy and are wondering why I vote for my own worker proposal:
7 Days ago I have contacted all shareholders that have me set as their proxy and sent them the following
message (hosted at github.com/xeroc/worker-proposal):

Quote
Dear Shareholder,

you receive this message because you have set the account "xeroc" as your voting
proxy in BitShares.

First, of all, I would like to thank you for the confidence and trust you have
in me.

However, I see the need to inform you about the decision I made to vote for my
own worker proposal going forward. You can find the details of it in
[github](https://github.com/xeroc/worker-proposals). In summary, the current
proposal would pay me roughly 3000€ for 20h/week of work during January and
February. After that time, a new proposal will be made with similar pay (Euro
denominated) to keep my BitShares related work funded. It is of great importance
to me to let you know about this conflicting interests!

To give you enough time to reconsider and change your voting proxy, I will *not*
vote for my proposal until Monday next week (28th of December).

Sincerely Yours
 -- Fabian Schuh a.k.a. xeroc

---
This message has been signed with PGP. The cryptographic signature can be found
in this git repository and you can verify it with `gpg --verify followers.md.sig`.

Today is 28th of December and as such, I will set my vote accordingly.
If you have me set as your proxy and do NOT agree with this you can still remove me as your proxy because my
vote will only be counted by the end of the day (maintenance interval).
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline roadscape

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2015, 12:52:14 AM »
Good move.. very responsible! +5%
http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

Offline abit

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2016, 04:16:10 PM »
Please consider voting against this proposal since it's wrong:
1.14.8   Bitshares UI Project Manager
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2016, 08:19:01 AM »
I have changed my votes for committee members to show support for those that actively participate in the fee schedule discussion behind the scenes.
That said, I am quite disappointed by those that I voted down that they have not voiced their opinion neither via telegram, nor via forum, or github.

Furthermore, since @alt seems to be quite aggressive when it comes to paying for workers, I am now rejecting refund/burn workers to so that we can keep the development going.

@alt, keep in mind that your current vote for my worker will result in me having to get a regular job which will certainly take 40h+/week.
With that, I will not be able to contribute to BitShares as I do now (if at all).
« Last Edit: February 07, 2016, 08:40:00 AM by xeroc »
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline abit

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2016, 05:55:11 PM »
I have changed my votes for committee members to show support for those that actively participate in the fee schedule discussion behind the scenes.
That said, I am quite disappointed by those that I voted down that they have not voiced their opinion neither via telegram, nor via forum, or github.

Furthermore, since @alt seems to be quite aggressive when it comes to paying for workers, I am now rejecting refund/burn workers to so that we can keep the development going.

@alt, keep in mind that your current vote for my worker will result in me having to get a regular job which will certainly take 40h+/week.
With that, I will not be able to contribute to BitShares as I do now (if at all).
@xeroc Please vote for the refund or burn workers.

IT'S DANGEROUS NOW.

By now, the refund worker which got highest votes is refund400k (113,325,926 BTS), which means any whale or group of whales or group of proxies who have more than 113K voting power is able to vote in a worker and steal funds from the reserve pool IMMEDIATELY. There is a flaw in the worker system, see https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/565. We(proxies and stake holders) can't all keep watching the worker list 24 hours.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline btswolf

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2016, 08:36:21 AM »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2016, 07:18:26 AM »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.
I don't think we have the liquidity to create AND trade ETH smartcoins in BTS just yet ..
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline abit

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2016, 09:16:00 AM »
Would you create an proposal to create an Ethereum Smartcoin?
Actually I would like to see all Top10 cryptos based on volume as Smartcoins on the DEX.
We need to position the DEX as a real alternative.
I don't think we have the liquidity to create AND trade ETH smartcoins in BTS just yet ..
I do think an ETH sidechain is the best approach. Before that, we already have exchange issued IOUs.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline hcf27

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • BTS: hcf27
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2016, 01:06:13 PM »
Hello @xeroc .. I think we should vote to refund @jonnybitcoin $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.

Offline abit

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2016, 03:20:02 PM »
Hello @xeroc .. I think we should vote to refund @JonnyBitcoin $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.
@hcf27 Proxies can vote if there is a worker created.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline hcf27

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
    • View Profile
  • BTS: hcf27
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2016, 04:06:38 PM »
Hello @xeroc .. I think we should vote to refund @JonnyBitcoin $2.8k for the social media accounts... these channels should then be handed over to the committe.
@hcf27 Proxies can vote if there is a worker created.
Yes, worker will be created soon on this issue

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2016, 06:57:50 AM »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BTS: bitcube
  • Witness: bitcube
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2016, 09:02:12 AM »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 09:04:44 AM by cube »
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Offline abit

Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2016, 11:50:28 AM »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12307
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Proxy: xeroc
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2016, 12:06:58 PM »
Update:

 - Approved the bitARS worker since they seem to work hard to get an ARS smartcoin and only ask for the asset creation fee. It would have been slightly better if they used a multisignature account, but I trust elmato

I urge against doing so.  It is not a matter of trust but a matter of doing it right.  IMHO, this has to be done right and the account should _at least_ be a multisig one with a number of independent and respected community members holding the keys.
Agreed.

@ElMato: To fix this, we could ask you to add the committee-account as a secondary account to your active AND owner key of the `elmato` account. Give your own keys and committee-account a weight of 1 and set a threshold of two .. After payout (e.g. the creation of the asset), the committee can then approve its own removal from your account permissions.
It has another advantage, namely, the whole committee can review the creation of the smartcoin and identify issuers prior to its creation.

Would that work for you? It seems you could get more approval if you do it that way.
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

 

Google+