Why aren't exchanges P2P as well?

Started by KhabsCat, February 11, 2014, 11:14:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

donutman3

#5
February 12, 2014, 09:08:37 AM
i think  problems sure
[url=http://www.jenbunjerd.com/products.php?cateparent=1358&level=3&thiscategories_id=1439]ดอลลี่[/url][url=http://www.jenbunjerd.com/products.php?cateparent=0&level=3&thiscategories_id=1727] โทรโข่ง[/url]

toast

#4
February 12, 2014, 02:45:44 AM
Most people don't see regulation and centralized control as problems, because it is easy to think of problems those things solve and hard to think of how it could be done in any other way
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

KhabsCat

#3
February 12, 2014, 01:32:48 AM
So one way of looking at the current issues with bitcoin is that the problem actually lies with traditional currencies. I don't this message is getting out there.

toast

#2
February 12, 2014, 01:10:43 AM
Because those exchanges deal with fiat and fiat requires centralization.

XCP/MSC have decentralized exchanges in the works
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

KhabsCat

#1
February 11, 2014, 11:14:51 PM
I'm sure I'm missing there, and maybe this has been discussed, but there is a bit of irony in a P2P currency being affected by a DDoS attack.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions