[ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool

Started by xolokram, November 08, 2013, 10:34:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rando

The linux version seems to work well, 93%-100% valid. But the hashpermin is low, it started ~8-9hpm, has gone as low as 1.5hpm, and is now hovering consistently around 3.5-3.8 hpm. Linux 64bit, 8CPU, 16GB, 799% CPU, 34% MEM; 8 processes. 

Is that hashpermin about right? I was expecting ~20.

lzr1900

when will the windows 64bit client come out?I want that..lol

xolokram

#16
the provided code hotfix can be used as "diff" for the source code (google)

- xolokram

ps. i'll be off for today, payout script should run when the first block is confirmed... good night
pps. ok, i just monitored the first 2 payouts, looks like everything is working fine --- i hope the pool will survive the night :)
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

NineLives

Quote from: gabainc on November 09, 2013, 12:03:57 AM
/APPENDIX: here's a fix (someone said bounty??) for the original protoshares client to increase the solo mining performance...
Code: [Select]


what file do you add this code in to improve the solo mining

Is there a fix for solo mining?  ie performance?
Keyhotee / BTSX:  Merah    PTS:  PskEDN4AeWc1trW4zV7DGGTQi3y5LeVhFR 

BTC Mining Hardware IN STOCK NOW:  [url="http://www.mininghardware.co.uk"]http://www.mininghardware.co.uk[/url]

voffka05

Xolo greate work!!! have Any settings for v0.2 miner? Like primeminer -sievsize , -sievextention ,  etc .

gabainc

/APPENDIX: here's a fix (someone said bounty??) for the original protoshares client to increase the solo mining performance...
Code: [Select]


what file do you add this code in to improve the solo mining

xolokram

ah i just noticed (thx to defragger) that the hashrate counter is not adding the counter when a new block just came in before a result was calculated
thus the hashrate will be lower for v0.2 than v0.1 --- in other words: currently only finished mining iterations are considered in the hashrate calculation.

- xolokram
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

NineLives

OK,

Running it now.  Two instances and it seems slow?  Is it cause its 32bit?

PS.  Nice work.
Keyhotee / BTSX:  Merah    PTS:  PskEDN4AeWc1trW4zV7DGGTQi3y5LeVhFR 

BTC Mining Hardware IN STOCK NOW:  [url="http://www.mininghardware.co.uk"]http://www.mininghardware.co.uk[/url]

xolokram

Quote from: NineLives on November 08, 2013, 11:42:17 PM
Is there a pool password?
no

the password option is there out of historical reasons

/edit: oh, thx hotapeno :)
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

hotapeno


NineLives

Keyhotee / BTSX:  Merah    PTS:  PskEDN4AeWc1trW4zV7DGGTQi3y5LeVhFR 

BTC Mining Hardware IN STOCK NOW:  [url="http://www.mininghardware.co.uk"]http://www.mininghardware.co.uk[/url]

xolokram

#7
64bit will take some time, because i'm currently not at my windows machine (and i'll have to adjust the compilation file first)
rough eta ~20 hours

just run multiple instances of the miner if you want to test the pool with more threads (yeah it's a ugly workaround)

- xolokram
stats for [email protected]
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

markj113

will do, just waiting to switch to that 64bit version :)

testz

Quote from: markj113 on November 08, 2013, 11:20:24 PM
great work, just joined the pool to see how it works out :)

Please update us about results  :)

markj113

great work, just joined the pool to see how it works out :)