BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => BitShares PTS => Topic started by: xolokram on November 08, 2013, 10:34:43 pm
-
Hi,
this is the official announcement for my protoshares mining sub-pool for www.beeeeer.org (http://www.beeeeer.org)
i'm the guy who runs beeeeer.org (obviously)
SERVICE HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN
thanks to all supporters
Some stats/features:
- 2.5% fee
- no registration needed, username is your protoshares-address
- beta testing phase (i'll work on every little bug/problem ASAP)
- custom protocol & miner (based on ptspool miner based on my xpm miner)
- i'm currently working on the payout system, at the moment it's proportional (but this will change)
- your payout will be executed, when blocks are confirmed (delay of 120 blocks) and you reach 0.1 PTS
- high end visual stunning plain-text web interface
Link:
ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org) <-- for your browser / see mining below
Client / Miner:
linux / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: v0.5 x32 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/10szy43zzf99xh8/ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip) (32 Bit, fast™!) up to 3 threads
windows binary: v0.5 x64 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/w1aukecc052a52p/ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip) (64 Bit, faster™!!)
windows binary: v0.7 x64 RC1 -> ptsminer_v07b_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/gezxz50ncr90veg/ptsminer_v07b_x64_bundle.zip) (64 Bit, AVX/SSE/SPHLIB experimental, fastererer™!!!) *UPDATED-#3* incl. 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix
(containing GENERIC (INTEL&AMD) , SSE4 and AVX version (INTEL&AMD))
mac: try http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg3904#msg3904 (thx to spoonman)
build notes: compilation needs boost lib & yasm
some notes:
a) it's not possible to completely erase the rejection rate problem (especially at the current low blocktime)
b) important: i changed the hashrate counter to count only valid iterations of the mining process (which v0.1, 0.2 & 0.3, and propably alpha miner? don't do!!!), thus your displayed hashrate is lower now --- but due to the changes i made for the rejection rate the miner is more effictive --- long story short: please only compare v0.4 against v0.4+ or use the amount of submitted valid shares per hour (or similiar) regarding mining performance
c) i'll look into the occasional random crashs next... give me some time
d) "b" applies for v0.5 and higher too :)
v0.4 or lower
usage:
ptsminer -poolip=<_SHUT_DOWN_> -poolport=1337 -pooluser=<your-pts-payout-address> -genproclimit=<threads-to-use>
example:
ptsminer -poolip=<_SHUT_DOWN_> -poolport=1337 -pooluser=PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap -genproclimit=4
v0.5
usage:
ptsminer <your-pts-payout-address> <threads-to-use>
example:
ptsminer PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
v0.6
github only
v0.7
choose <version> depending on your CPU and mining implementation you want to use
usage: ptsminer_<version>.exe <payout-address> <threads-to-use> [memory-option] [mode]
memory-option: integer value - memory usage
20 --> 4 MB per thread (not recommended)
21 --> 8 MB per thread (not recommended)
22 --> 16 MB per thread (not recommended)
23 --> 32 MB per thread (not recommended)
24 --> 64 MB per thread (not recommended)
25 --> 128 MB per thread
26 --> 256 MB per thread
27 --> 512 MB per thread (default)
28 --> 1024 MB per thread
29 --> 2048 MB per thread
30 --> 4096 MB per thread
mode: string - mining implementation
avx --> use AVX (ptsminer_avx.exe)
sse4 --> use SSE4 (ptsminer_avx.exe & ptsminer_sse4.exe)
sph --> use SPHLIB (ptsminer_avx.exe, ptsminer_sse4.exe, ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe)
examples:
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
using AVX on 4 threads and 512 MByte RAM per thread (default)
ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
using SSE4 on 8 threads and 1024 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 2 25 sph
using SPHLIB on 2 threads and 128 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 12 24 sph
using SPHLIB on 12 threads and 64 MByte RAM per thread
FAQ:
We are not responsible for any damage to your computer system or data with our provided
service and software and in no event will we be responsible for any consequential, incidental,
or indirect damages arising out of the use or inability to use our service or software.
Any known issues?
not by now
Why 'beeeeer.org'?
Everybody loves beer, that's why. (Ok, almost everybody)
Has the server crashed again?
If the status page isn't available: yup - something really bad happened. We're still in beta/testing phase, don't panic, everything will be ok!!
AVX instruction set on Amazon EC2:
AVX instructions are supported only when HVM virtualization is used. There are HVM versions of the Amazon Linux AMI and Ubuntu AMI available. Unfortunately AVX cannot be used with a PV Linux AMI due to incompatibilities with some Linux kernels regarding XSAVE instructions.
A list of HVM Amazon Linux AMI IDs is available here: http://aws.amazon.com/amazon-linux-ami/
- xolokram, glhf
wanna donate?
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb
LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd
PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap
just fyi: i'll fix that asap...
ah i just noticed (thx to defragger) that the hashrate counter is not adding the counter when a new block just came in before a result was calculated
thus the hashrate will be lower for v0.2 than v0.1 --- in other words: currently only finished mining iterations are considered in the hashrate calculation.
- xolokram
/APPENDIX: here's a fix (someone said bounty??) for the original protoshares client to increase the solo mining performance...
nvm, nobody cares
-
you are god
-
wait unitl i f--- up the payout script :D you remember the good ol' primecoin times....... :o
btw. PLEASE DONT USE v0.1 MINER FROM THE OTHER "NAMELESS" POOL
get sure what version you use!!
-
great work, just joined the pool to see how it works out :)
-
great work, just joined the pool to see how it works out :)
Please update us about results :)
-
will do, just waiting to switch to that 64bit version :)
-
64bit will take some time, because i'm currently not at my windows machine (and i'll have to adjust the compilation file first)
rough eta ~20 hours
just run multiple instances of the miner if you want to test the pool with more threads (yeah it's a ugly workaround)
- xolokram
-
Is there a pool password?
-
No password, you can set to 0 for now
-
Is there a pool password?
no
the password option is there out of historical reasons
/edit: oh, thx hotapeno :)
-
OK,
Running it now. Two instances and it seems slow? Is it cause its 32bit?
PS. Nice work.
-
ah i just noticed (thx to defragger) that the hashrate counter is not adding the counter when a new block just came in before a result was calculated
thus the hashrate will be lower for v0.2 than v0.1 --- in other words: currently only finished mining iterations are considered in the hashrate calculation.
- xolokram
-
/APPENDIX: here's a fix (someone said bounty??) for the original protoshares client to increase the solo mining performance...
Code: [Select]
what file do you add this code in to improve the solo mining
-
Xolo greate work!!! have Any settings for v0.2 miner? Like primeminer -sievsize , -sievextention , etc .
-
/APPENDIX: here's a fix (someone said bounty??) for the original protoshares client to increase the solo mining performance...
Code: [Select]
what file do you add this code in to improve the solo mining
Is there a fix for solo mining? ie performance?
-
the provided code hotfix can be used as "diff" for the source code (google)
- xolokram
ps. i'll be off for today, payout script should run when the first block is confirmed... good night
pps. ok, i just monitored the first 2 payouts, looks like everything is working fine --- i hope the pool will survive the night :)
-
when will the windows 64bit client come out？I want that..lol
-
The linux version seems to work well, 93%-100% valid. But the hashpermin is low, it started ~8-9hpm, has gone as low as 1.5hpm, and is now hovering consistently around 3.5-3.8 hpm. Linux 64bit, 8CPU, 16GB, 799% CPU, 34% MEM; 8 processes.
Is that hashpermin about right? I was expecting ~20.
-
awesome job on the pool!!!
question : my protoshares-qt says "No block Source Available" , is this normal ? can i create address and join the pool ? or should i first wait for it to sync ?
Thanks!
-
addnode 162.243.67.4 add
addnode 162.243.54.126 add
addnode 37.139.29.236 add
addnode 64.90.183.137 add
addnode 180.183.205.118 add
This pool is awesome, no rejects so far! (short time)
-
Awesomeness in a bag - much better than the others ones by far. Switching my minehoard over.
PbwQHoJi7PKt9KCujbscNWfH43J4aCpPmN
-
we need 64bit linux and win
Thanks a lot~ :'(
-
addnode 162.243.67.4 add
addnode 162.243.54.126 add
addnode 37.139.29.236 add
addnode 64.90.183.137 add
addnode 180.183.205.118 add
This pool is awesome, no rejects so far! (short time)
LiteMine, What is this? Isn't adding nodes for solo mining? Just want to make sure I'm not missing something.
-
Just to get your wallet synced, not for mining. dima1236 asked about it.
The directions for the pool in the OP work perfectly, if you have any problems, just ask! We need more miners and blocks found. I went from 65% rejected to about 5% with this pool.
xolokram, make a bitcointalk thread and spread the word. :)
-
I get a lot less rejected on this pool. We'll see about the payout rate compared to the others.
-
Just checked and for me it seems that there is less rejects but hashrate is much lower than the other client (does it just hide rejected shares?) - overall the same :)
-
beeeeer.org has been out there for awhile in the crypto scene. seems very reliable imo.
i'm adding my nodes now. cheers! def see a much better quality pool, rejects level is almost non-existance. must be something in the verification on the pool side...? awesome. thanks. again kuddos. mm, late night tea.
-
Just checked and for me it seems that there is less rejects but hashrate is much lower than the other client (does it just hide rejected shares?) - overall the same :)
i was wondering that too about the rejects possibly hiding, but i think it's something he's done on his pool.
-
The linux version seems to work well, 93%-100% valid. But the hashpermin is low, it started ~8-9hpm, has gone as low as 1.5hpm, and is now hovering consistently around 3.5-3.8 hpm. Linux 64bit, 8CPU, 16GB, 799% CPU, 34% MEM; 8 processes.
Is that hashpermin about right? I was expecting ~20.
No the hashes/min output is bugged.
Just checked and for me it seems that there is less rejects but hashrate is much lower than the other client (does it just hide rejected shares?) - overall the same :)
i was wondering that too about the rejects possibly hiding, but i think it's something he's done on his pool.
my stats:
VL: 2687 (99.4%), RJ: 15 (0.6%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
there is no much space to hide rejects. i made a lot PTS tonight on beeeeer pool, it's working so much better than pts pool.
-
The linux version seems to work well, 93%-100% valid. But the hashpermin is low, it started ~8-9hpm, has gone as low as 1.5hpm, and is now hovering consistently around 3.5-3.8 hpm. Linux 64bit, 8CPU, 16GB, 799% CPU, 34% MEM; 8 processes.
Is that hashpermin about right? I was expecting ~20.
No the hashes/min output is bugged.
Just checked and for me it seems that there is less rejects but hashrate is much lower than the other client (does it just hide rejected shares?) - overall the same :)
i was wondering that too about the rejects possibly hiding, but i think it's something he's done on his pool.
my stats:
VL: 2687 (99.4%), RJ: 15 (0.6%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
there is no much space to hide rejects. i made a lot PTS tonight on beeeeer pool, it's working so much better than pts pool.
i definitely agree. :)
-
@LOW HASHRATE:
the console output is bugged, i missed the counter that is now skipped occasionally due to the rejection rate fix
the actual hash rate is just like before, nothing has changed in the mining code, except that the miner is now updated correctly, when the pool spreads new work to the miners
not like with v0.1, which was just mining on stale blocks
i will fix that with the next release (linux source code update on github in a few minutes now)
if someone is interested, i can show you this in the code @smith88 & feeleep & rando & co.
@64 BIT & xxrforone & lzr1900 & co.:
eta is about 11 hours on my side (i'm currently not on a windows machine) --- i think the other guy from the "nameless pool" (ptspool?) will be faster with compiling the miner today
but miners & pools are compatible (afaik)
you can already compile the miner for 64bit on linux machines, just use the common instructions for linux.
if you have a 64bit machine, a 64bit distribution, then you're compilation suite should be 64bit too and thus compile the 64bit version of the miner!
@LiteMine:
you're probably right - man, i hate this thread managing :) i need a PR manager :D
@donschoe:
like always, thx for the help
- xolokram
-
The linux version seems to work well, 93%-100% valid. But the hashpermin is low, it started ~8-9hpm, has gone as low as 1.5hpm, and is now hovering consistently around 3.5-3.8 hpm. Linux 64bit, 8CPU, 16GB, 799% CPU, 34% MEM; 8 processes.
Is that hashpermin about right? I was expecting ~20.
No the hashes/min output is bugged.
Just checked and for me it seems that there is less rejects but hashrate is much lower than the other client (does it just hide rejected shares?) - overall the same :)
i was wondering that too about the rejects possibly hiding, but i think it's something he's done on his pool.
my stats:
VL: 2687 (99.4%), RJ: 15 (0.6%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
there is no much space to hide rejects. i made a lot PTS tonight on beeeeer pool, it's working so much better than pts pool.
are you having connect issues now? uh oh, server having issues? probably sleeping. hope it fixes itself.
hah, nevermind, saw your post xolo :)
update: i see you are awake. so should i update my servers with a new client? i'll stay awake for a bit more n wait. thanks for your work!
... also i am not seeing the connect issues as I was about 10 minutes ago. May have been a local network prob
-
i just checked my logs on the pool, looks like there are no issues on my side currently (except for a restart on the web frontend sometime last night)
you should definitely switch to the new miner, the old one (incl. the original pts client) ist just bad regarding rejection rates (stale blocks)
btw if a payout states "reward = 0" (e.g. here (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/8607)), that specific block is an orphan unfortunately --- just fyi before someone asks
everyone who is/was mining on my old xpm pool should be aware of the gorgeous payout-info pages
- xolokram
-
i just checked my logs on the pool, you should definitely switch to the new miner, the old one (incl. the original pts client) ist just bad regarding rejection rates (stale blocks)
looks like there were no issues (except for a restart on the web frontend sometime last night)
btw if a payout states "reward = 0" (e.g. here (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/8607)), that specific block is an orphan unfortunately --- just fyi before someone asks
everyone who is/was mining on my old xpm pool should be aware of the gorgeous payout-info pages
- xolokram
perfect, thanks xolokram
BTW looks like I am using v.2 so should be good, yes?
-
please use the "edit" button instead of double posting
if you are using v0.2 then everything should be fine
as long as you're also using:
-poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337
;D
ps. i just pushed the hashrate counter fix (or i hope it's finally fixed now :) ) to github: linux users pull the latest source from github (commit = 48d62e8f95..)
-
you bet. :D too much tea...
yes, looks like I am using this in my startup file:
ptsminer.exe -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -poolpassword=x -pooluser=*** -genproclimit=3. systems are 64 bit Win so running multi instances has not been a problem. no issues as of yet.
-
pool backend has a bug
the pool will be back in a few minutes
i'm working on it
(blocks&payouts are save)
ok i deployed a workaround, i'll look into that issue later today
/edit:
AND i fixed the hashrate counter fix (yes, i guess i need some sleep.......)
commithash = 48d62e8f95
-
huh, i see offline, any info about low hashrate, i have 4 rigs 8 cores each ald 12gb ram, but i got till now just sth like this:
Found Hash 0f5c792a2f6e5a41d89ee286177195ab71614da6af813dd124a1ee2136a60daf
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-11-09 09:00:17 | hashmeter 1.574343 hashs/min
VL: 23 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
strange its slow, on some machines vl gets till 45
oh can you post how to update to miner v 0.2 please i have 0.1
-
hashrate counter is buggy in the old commit, it's now fixed on github
backend got stuck (check the height value on the webpage), that's fixed now too
- xolokram
-
hashrate counter is buggy in the old commit, it's now fixed on github
backend got stuck (check the height value on the webpage), that's fixed too now
- xolokram
that's great, i see my miners are running again. thanks. as for payout, is this still be developed?
again, thank you for the work.
-
ok tnx ill download new one in one hour, hope old client is still working
-
the payout script is already running and everything looks ok
there's just a delay, because i only pay for confirmed blocks (confirmations needed: 120)
check the payouts info page
-
Hello guys!
Can someone tell me why I'm getting these, and how to fix it?
Thanks!
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
hashmeter 0 khash/s
-
got them too, after restart and compilling new from source, it is now fixed
-
I can't go to the pool :(
-
xolokram, i have a problem, after a while i got this error all the time:
[STATS] 2013-11-09 13:38:42 | hashmeter 5.962389 hashs/min
VL: 5 (83.3%), RJ: 1 (16.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Found Hash 000130f96cd1607fa9d57916d2efb61376a2794d6f4c40ef812682629953d216
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-11-09 13:41:11 | hashmeter 6.307057 hashs/min
VL: 6 (85.7%), RJ: 1 (14.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-11-09 13:41:11 | hashmeter 6.307057 hashs/min
VL: 7 (87.5%), RJ: 1 (12.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Found Hash 02579ccca7f5e657d83b8b80f1ced28db699165358a2ea0e86a78d016f86ee9d
Found Hash 004bec3dc3baacebe91d224c77ae411e6d64e0feec7f1462862aa33c331aa69e
force reconnect if possible!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
Found Hash 03af8ccd3c70b8dfb1241633fb67850bfc697d39ba33d724f42298695d3af065
Found Hash 0041d0a43eb7c5ddcb225ef8a813f713b27f96de6f12b5bdc8fb33506cf58ae4
Found Hash 03ba4c9d5129c3eaeb9d213d5dd36a8a8c7137187f485efd51364e0968de4bcc
Found Hash 0ed32dfb3503b5dd2ee096cae5674f9b0452b159659e0b2c6f1bb61b7ea7d5c5
Found Hash 0e25f20614ce9e5ba1cc488c7f5a6cee9b2229ef0757b51d4512fee8142ea30b
Found Hash 08f07d1f97d841d1d2dc96ea0ccd40dd82a714b19f6e65ee3952129781eb5206
Found Hash 07e0a35da5768339d1417207b3f628b0483094f7ce260a8015eb60c2d9821f90
does that force reconnect if possible cause any problems?
-
sorry, i was working on the pool
it should be fine now
/edit:
if the automatic reconnect doesnt work, please reconnect manually
i'm sorry for the inconvenience
-
got them too, after restart and compilling new from source, it is now fixed
I tryed to restart it but nothing changed. I'm on win7 64bit and I don't really know which depencies I need for compiling from source...
@xolokram: can you help me with this?
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
[MASTER] work received - target: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
hashmeter 0 khash/s
-
it looks ok
anyone encountered a lot of rejects now??
-
Strange, just woke up expecting to see a bunch of PTS, but in the last 9 hours I only made a total of 5. I am throwing over 200 cores at this pool.
When I look at the website, I see that I am submitting a lot of shares, but I am just not getting anything in payout. Can someone check this out for me?
PdkDGV5hfsCb25Z32GTYVkaG1B6BCYSN8c
-Randy
-
same here dont know how this works, but seems like all bigger users get all the payouts..
-
no, the payouts
are were not going to the big miners
the payouts are were going to no one at all (incl. the pool), because almost all blocks we find are we've found were orphans
i'll have to check the backend, i guess it had something to do with the stuck backend i fixed a few hours ago - i didn't thought it had such an big impact
/edit: i'll test some things on the pool side, expect some hickups done
-
According stat, most blocks goes to: http://54.238.185.113/blocks
Edit: and rest goes here: http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.0
-
yup, ptspool (or whatever name it has) is pretty dominant --- which is actually pretty bad for the overall network/coin, but no one seems to give a f---
i dont know how big bytemaster's pool is & i think there are still some people out there solomining
-
no, the payouts are were not going to the big miners
the payouts are were going to no one at all (incl. the pool), because almost all blocks we find are we've found were orphans
i'll have to check the backend, i guess it had something to do with the stuck backend i fixed a few hours ago - i didn't thought it had such an big impact
/edit: i'll test some things on the pool side, expect some hickups done
I've just received my first 3 PTS from this pool, so I'm guessing we are not getting orphans anymore? Here's hoping!
F.
-
I've still not received anything. Mining with about 50 cores.
Is the alpha miner alot faster than this miner is? I'm not getting anywhere near the 30 khs they are talking about over in the other thread (but i'm also running on linux not windows).
-
@joesmoe:
read the thread, the pool had some issues this morning (resulting in alot of orphaned blocks)
and there are no payouts atm because the pool hasn't found any new blocks yet -- we don't have 15k miners currently...
the lower hashrate is because of the bug (injected by the rejection fix) in the hashrate counter that was mentioned in this thread earlier
- xolokram
ps. updated 32&64bit windows binary incoming, stay tuned
-
@joesmoe:
read the thread, the pool had some issues this morning (resulting in alot of orphaned blocks)
and there are no payouts atm because the pool hasn't found any new blocks yet
the lower hashrate is because of the bug in the counter that was mentioned in this thread
- xolokram
ps. updated 32&64bit windows binary incoming, stay tuned
haha okay will read more closely sorry :)
Thanks for the quick reply, can't wait to see some coins :)
-
speaking of finding blocks, we've found a block which needs ~80 confirmations until payout *yippie*
-
Hi,
my ptsminer v0.3
Client / Miner: (INCLUDING REJECTION RATE & HASHCOUNTER FIX)
linux / mac / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: ptsminer_v03_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/cczpo1s98l0ywj1/ptsminer_v03_x32.zip) (32 Bit)
windows binary: ptsminer_v03_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/73zql98ly5sl6j9/ptsminer_v03_x64.zip) (64 Bit - faster!!)
usage:
ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=[your-payout-address] -genproclimit=[threads-to-use]
website:
ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org)
- xolokram
ps. thx to "that other pool guy" for working on the my miner <-- long story short version
-
Hi there!
Love the beeeeer.org pool! Couple of quick questions, do i need a new wallet for mining the Protoshares?
Second question is there any tweeks for your miner that can be made like seive size, target etc etc??
Thanks
enmore
-
hi
you'll need a protoshares address / wallet (get the client here (https://www.dropbox.com/s/4c6mvgyqsajugbo/protoshares.zip)(official site seems to be down?!))
unfortunately, there are no mining/tweaking parameters yet --- i'll look into that when i have the time
- xolokram
-
hi
you'll need a protoshares address / wallet (get the client here (https://www.dropbox.com/s/4c6mvgyqsajugbo/protoshares.zip)(official site seems to be down?!))
unfortunately, there are no mining/tweaking parameters yet --- i'll look into that when i have the time
- xolokram
Official site alive: http://invictus-innovations.com/downloads/
-
Official thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325261.0
-
I do not think I received payment yet, I see address in payouts in stats but none received to wallet:
PYpnUWTScAwDptgCR1wArTGEKmkaQHe8yv
Were they bad blocks? Why showing up in payouts?
Thank you :D
-
Fairly new at this and must be doing something wrong. I downloaded the miner and edited the ptsminer_64bit_EDIT-ME to say
ptsminer_64bit.exe -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=[PgXywCLwGrZJhy2z1TXrJTxJ83VYesaDXp] -genproclimit=[3]
This is my address I added and not sure what the genproclimit is but perhaps its how many cpus being used? I run this and this is what happens...
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.3 RC1
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
usage: current maximum supported number of threads = 64
********************************************
*** running time: 0.000h
***
*** valid: 0 (0.000%)
*** rejects: 0 (0.000%)
*** stale: 0 (0.000%)
********************************************
Then it shuts down.
I also can not get the ProtoShares Wallet to get blocks. It says..
No block source available...
I tried adding
addnode 162.243.67.4 add
addnode 162.243.54.126 add
addnode 37.139.29.236 add
addnode 64.90.183.137 add
addnode 180.183.205.118 add
in the debug console area but still says that no block source and I an 4 days behind.
Any ideas?
-
Try removing the []
ptsminer_64bit.exe -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=PgXywCLwGrZJhy2z1TXrJTxJ83VYesaDXp -genproclimit=3
to fix the No sources you have to launch protoshares-qt.exe -addnode xxxx fixed it for me
-
That did it. Thanks! Still not getting blocks in the wallet but hey at least I am mining!
-
try this, it worked for me, protoshares-qt.exe -addnode=168.63.12.227
or other node ips
-
32bit version ptsminer keeps crashing.. runtime errors
-
How soon till we get payouts?
-
Hello
Sorry but I am unable to connect to the pool.
I managed to get both clients running(not at the same time) and both the 32 bit and 64 bit versions are giving me the message connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337 a few hundred times. and have been stuck like so for about twenty minutes now.
It's something like this
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
What should I do?
Thanks.
-
whoa 75% rejection rate!?!?!?!
-
I am also seeing high rejection rate. Seems like it is higher the last couple hours. 36 valid 86 rejected. 70.4% rejected.
-
hi,
first: i decreased the payout barrier from 3 PTS to 1 PTS, so you should receive more smaller payouts now. this will start with the next payout.
that means: your payout address has to reach 1 pts before a payout is initiated
if you've not received any payout yet, go to the payouts list, open the latest payout and check the value of your address in the "next" field, that's your current balance.
I'm aware of some problems: including rej.rate & crashs
although i've not encountered one crash on my side --- which makes it hard to debug
also the rejection rate seems to be around ~10-20% here, but i'll look into this (checking the server now)
and the unusual high rate of orphaned blocks bugs me... i'll check that... most recent blocks seem to be fine... cool!
@xspeed9190:
thank you for helping.
- xolokram
-
Just some stats:
4 procs
200 VL
68 RJ
9 Hours
Trying again with 3 procs
-
pointed my workers on that pool ;)
getwork or stratum?
-
it's a custom protocol. you should use my miner, see the first post in this thread.
but i'm currently working on a fix for a share rejection problem. you should monitor this thread. :)
- xolokram
-
Hi, I'm pretty new to this.
Have been running this for a while using 2 desktops. On the weakest one I'm getting mostly "REJECTED" shares. I suppose this is normal.
Is there a log file or similar that displays total results on the individual desktops?
-
Hi,
my ptsminer v0.4 "next try hotfix"
Client / Miner:
linux / mac / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: ptsminer_v04_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/yooy75kyof15qdr/ptsminer_v04_x32.zip) (32 Bit, supports up to 3 threads due to 32bit limitation)
windows binary: ptsminer_v04_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/27ru4xilwf6lnf4/ptsminer_v04_x64.zip) (64 Bit - more threads & faster!!)
usage:
ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=[your-payout-address] -genproclimit=[threads-to-use]
website:
ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org)
some notes: !!! please read !!!
a) it's not possible to completely erase the rejection rate problem (especially at the current insane blocktime), but the patch/hotfix should reduce the problems!!
b) important: i changed the hashrate counter to count only valid iterations of the mining process (which v0.1, 0.2 & 0.3, and propably alpha miner? don't do!!!), thus your displayed hashrate is lower now --- but due to the changes i made for the rejection rate the miner is more effictive --- long story short: please only compare v0.4 against v0.4+ or the amount of submitted valid shares per hour (or similiar) regarding mining performance
c) i've added some changes to the MacOSX compilation file, can someone test if this works now? (i dont have a suitable test environment) macosx fix incoming
d) i'll look into the occasional random crashs next... give me some time
- xolokram
ps. there will be some downtime of the pool for a few minutes (in a few minutes) as i have to update the backend for the blockchain fork...
pps. i'm sorry about the inconvenience the last patch caused
-
updating now, thanks for your work! ;)
no crashes here btw
-
hashmeter shows 0, but shares are getting submitted and accepted ok
(it just took a few shares before showed up)
-
it takes ~4 minutes until the hashrate stats will appear
(before that it will just gather the data and displays 0 hashes/min)
-
Just wanted you all to be prepared to updated your client in the next couple of hours for the hard fork to address difficulty scaling.
We are in the final stages of testing it, but the code is already in github.
-
if you use ptsminer you dont have to update anything (except switching to v0.4 :) what i recommend )
i'll update the backend in a few minutes (this means a short downtime for the pool!) to be ready for the chainfork
- xolokram
-
BACKEND UPDATE INCOMING, POOL WILL BE DOWN FOR A FEW MINUTES DONE
- xolokram
ps. sorry for double post
-
You should probably implement a primitive autocorrect for payout addresses.
There is a guy out there with the address PmVC1BTpq6AcDFwAKC6PPtMEiTdGWhvhnn]
-
New client is working great! Compiled the source for my Linux i5 and it's running well too. Thanks for all your hard work! Was getting 80% rejects before but with your new miner it's happy days :). Just got payed out at the 1PTS threshold so all is well for me.
Stats for 7 threads on an FX-8350 (one thread reserved for cgminer).
[STATS] 2013-11-10 15:15:33 | hashmeter 9.616751 hashs/min
VL: 119 (93.7%), RJ: 8 (6.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Cheers.
-
xolokram, ive received emergency fork for protoshares, will we also have to change the client?
original mail:
Please download the new clients at:
http://invictus-innovations.com/downloads
All news announcement about this upgrade will be in the following topic:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=370.0
Regards,
The BitShares Forum Team.
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php
-
no, everything will be ok (hopefully, i updated the backend)
you dont have to update anything (but i recommend to use miner v0.4, if you've not switched yet)
@Nick:
thanks for the hint, i'll update the payout script & payouts
it looks like he's not mining currently
- xolokram
ps. i'll be back later today --- cross your fingers for the chainfork everyone
-
is there any way to see your ballance?
-
is there any way to see your ballance?
go to latest payout http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/11873
hit ctrl+f search for your address until you find it in block "next" or "payout".
payout = your pts are sent to you and your balance is 0.
next = your balance if not paid out.
-
[STATS] 2013-11-10 16:49:08 | hashmeter 3.671844 hashs/min
VL: 15 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
force reconnect if possible!
Found Hash 08706674d8ab1f5bd04cfdd2de027397c88c7560a5bc56a63f1661f91e580371
Segmentation fault
why it stopped? im doing somwthing wrong?
-
thanks for all of your hardwork xolo! I'm glad to report that v.04 has fixed the high rejection rate on my end.
ps the plain-text interface is really starting to grow on me ;)
-
xolo - I like your pool, its been working good since you released it.
Questions about the fork
When will you switch over? Do miners need to do anything like restart all clients?
What do you think of the 2 hour notice to discuss the fork?
-
is there any way to see your ballance?
go to latest payout http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/11873
hit ctrl+f search for your address until you find it in block "next" or "payout".
payout = your pts are sent to you and your balance is 0.
next = your balance if not paid out.
I mined for a few hours last night. I see my addresses in the payout or next. I used v3 client. I have not received a a single PTS. I'm now using v4 client. Why am I not getting any payout?
-
xolo - I like your pool, its been working good since you released it.
Questions about the fork
When will you switch over? Do miners need to do anything like restart all clients?
What do you think of the 2 hour notice to discuss the fork?
Beeeeer pool already switched to new fork, miner clients are updated, make sure you use v0.4
-
Hi !
I got accepted valid share with miner v04 and PTS address seems valid but my balance is not updated in the payout pages of successive payouts. any idea ?
-
Hi !
I got accepted valid share with miner v04 and PTS address seems valid but my balance is not updated in the payout pages of successive payouts. any idea ?
Looks like the last block to payout was 1200. I think there's been 23 blocks found since then (blocks lists up to 12122). Maybe his payout script crashed :). Do you see your address in any of the blocks listed here? http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks
-
Hi !
I got accepted valid share with miner v04 and PTS address seems valid but my balance is not updated in the payout pages of successive payouts. any idea ?
Looks like the last block to payout was 1200. I think there's been 23 blocks found since then (blocks lists up to 12122). Maybe his payout script crashed :). Do you see your address in any of the blocks listed here? http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks
Thanks for the reply,
I see my address in two payouts pages (12000,11991 maybe also before i didn't check) but the amount in the balance is stuck at the same value but i was mining and sending shares as i am now.
As i am mining with only 1 cpu maybe it's just a not enough decimal places issue?
-
same here i was looking at this too, strange
-
I too have submitted shares which do show up within some blocks here http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks)
but no payouts?
-
Oh well having some company it's nice maybe we can pin down the issue. Or maybe not it depends if its on our side 8P
-
can at least one of you
three four provide any useful information, like a pts address or something?
i mean srsly i can't do or check anything with the last 6 posts!
your submitted shares are bound to the recent block the pool finds.
and every block needs to be confirmed (120 subsequent blocks) by the protoshares network before being paid out to the miners!
@donschoe:
like always - thank you
@solaaire:
the web frontend is what i'm most proud of...... ;)
@gnarl:
backend is already updated.
@hasher:
segmentation fault --- well, there's a problem with the memory allocation/access.
can you check if your mining machine is running out of memory while mining??
@everybody complaining about the payouts:
please try to understand how the payout system works first, then complain!
i'll have to add some user stats obviously.
- xolokram
-
can at least one of you three provide any useful information, like a pts address or something?
i mean srsly i can't do or check anything with the last 6 posts!
your submitted shares are bound to the recent block the pool finds.
and every block needs to be confirmed (120 subsequent blocks) by the protoshares network before being paid out to the miners!
@donschoe:
like always - thank you
@solaaire:
the web frontend is what i'm most proud of...... ;)
@gnarl:
backend is already updated.
@hasher:
segmentation fault, there a problem with the memory allocation/access.
can you check if you mining machine is running out of memory while mining??
@everybody complaining about the payouts:
please try to understand how the payout system works first, then complain!
i'll have to add some user stats obviously.
- xolokram
MY PTS address: Puk4cqPnGynvDGw9Mu1ubce1XPQmEw8B3c
I was mining last night for few hours and submitting shares on v01 and v02 client. Now I'm using the v04 client. The other thing I notice is my PTS client is updating very slowly. It's at block 2104 so far.
-
@gnarl:
backend is already updated.
- xolokram
awesome, v.04 is rockin too, thx
-
Pf5xsHsidzV2WYWgdHPgptEwFyfpmcn3pe
Here is my address xolokram.
thanks
-
Hi xolo,
excuse me if i sound like i was complaining, your work is great i was really thinking that the error is on my side.
My PTS adress is PvSMfZEqYn1ADURv8GoFfw8vTNAPT1c9dg
I was mining with v04 and gettin valid shares, on Blocks 12000,11991,11984 balance is stuck on the same 0.34 amount.
Actually in blocks detail i cannot see any of my shares counted, so maybe i was not mining after all not sure, if you can check the times i have accepted shares on my miner screen dated 2 hours ago, and in last blocks i can see my shares so maybe nothing to worry about.
I will check next payout.
-
block 2104?
you're probably on the wrong chain --- update your protoshares software (the one you use for your personal wallet/address) !!!!!!
maybe that's the problem for all of you four...
there has been a hard chainfork, forcing old clients to use a broken chain. new payouts are executed on the correct & new chain (with current block height = 12126) !
@gnarl:
thank you
/edit1:
wow, you three guys are quick ;)
also: you should use ptsminer v0.4 for your mining machines!! if you're not already doing this
/edit2:
urghs, so many typos
-
block 2104?
you're probably on the wrong chain --- update your protoshares software (the one you use for your personal wallet/address) !!!!!!
maybe that's the problem for all of you four...
there has been a hard chainfork, forcing old clients to use a broken chain. new payouts are executed on the correct & new chain!
@gnarl:
thank you
/edit1:
wow, you three guys are quick ;)
also: you should use ptsminer v0.4 for your mining machines!! if you're not already doing this
/edit2:
urghs, so many typos
I upgraded the miner ( to 0.4 ) just after you uploaded it and upgraded the wallet before the fork ( and re-downloaded the forked blockchain )..
Will see what happens next :)
-
Hi,Xolo.Check my adress too PiQFZ9vj8kD5CuTyRc96zs9rhtRH22BV7q .I have not payouts in my wallet,and stats in your backend.Very strange.Sorry for my bad english.
-
My client is now updated. It's at block height 12130 so I must have the right client. But still no PTS. I'm using client v04. I see my address in the payout section in 'next'. Will I get any payout eventually?
Found Hash 09ed68cb0a31c607a162795832413fc6c310c278c2b8563951dc57e550965dbe
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-11-10 19:59:19 | hashmeter 5.841406 hashs/min
VL: 73 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
just added:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Puk4cqPnGynvDGw9Mu1ubce1XPQmEw8B3c
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pf5xsHsidzV2WYWgdHPgptEwFyfpmcn3pe
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvSMfZEqYn1ADURv8GoFfw8vTNAPT1c9dg
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PiQFZ9vj8kD5CuTyRc96zs9rhtRH22BV7q
it's a little bit messy atm, but i think it will be helpful (work in progress)
you have to reach 1.0 PTS before you get any payout (it's mentioned in the first post of this thread)
-
just added:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Puk4cqPnGynvDGw9Mu1ubce1XPQmEw8B3c
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pf5xsHsidzV2WYWgdHPgptEwFyfpmcn3pe
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvSMfZEqYn1ADURv8GoFfw8vTNAPT1c9dg
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PiQFZ9vj8kD5CuTyRc96zs9rhtRH22BV7q
it's a little bit messy atm, but i think it will be helpful (work in progress)
you have to reach 1.0 PTS before you get any payout (it's mentioned in the first post of this thread)
Excellent.... Thank you so much.....
-
Thanks Xolo! The /user page is a huge help. I am also a big fan of the text only web site. My slow ass PII wallet slave laptop thanks you too lol.
just added:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Puk4cqPnGynvDGw9Mu1ubce1XPQmEw8B3c
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pf5xsHsidzV2WYWgdHPgptEwFyfpmcn3pe
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvSMfZEqYn1ADURv8GoFfw8vTNAPT1c9dg
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PiQFZ9vj8kD5CuTyRc96zs9rhtRH22BV7q
it's a little bit messy atm, but i think it will be helpful (work in progress)
you have to reach 1.0 PTS before you get any payout (it's mentioned in the first post of this thread)
-
wow, look at the orphan streak @block#8607 :o
fyi the confirmations take a little bit longer now due to the latest difficulty changes
- kroloxam
-
just added:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Puk4cqPnGynvDGw9Mu1ubce1XPQmEw8B3c
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pf5xsHsidzV2WYWgdHPgptEwFyfpmcn3pe
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvSMfZEqYn1ADURv8GoFfw8vTNAPT1c9dg
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PiQFZ9vj8kD5CuTyRc96zs9rhtRH22BV7q
it's a little bit messy atm, but i think it will be helpful (work in progress)
you have to reach 1.0 PTS before you get any payout (it's mentioned in the first post of this thread)
That REALLY helps...thanks so much for that!
-
Thanks for this. If I'm reading this correctly then it looks like I'll never get to 1.0 PTS :(
-
with latest git getting an error on mac
In file included from /Users/nate/Downloads/ptsminer/src/netbase.h:10:
/Users/nate/Downloads/ptsminer/src/serialize.h:911:10: error: class member cannot be redeclared
void insert(iterator it, std::vector<char>::const_iterator first, std::vector<char>::const_iterator last)
^
/Users/nate/Downloads/ptsminer/src/serialize.h:898:10: note: previous declaration is here
void insert(iterator it, const_iterator first, const_iterator last)
^
/Users/nate/Downloads/ptsminer/src/serialize.h:911:10: error: redefinition of 'insert'
void insert(iterator it, std::vector<char>::const_iterator first, std::vector<char>::const_iterator last)
^
/Users/nate/Downloads/ptsminer/src/serialize.h:898:10: note: previous definition is here
void insert(iterator it, const_iterator first, const_iterator last)
^
2 errors generated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1
-
Thanks for this. If I'm reading this correctly then it looks like I'll never get to 1.0 PTS :(
how much hps you have ?
-
How to run https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer on Ubuntu 12.04.3 x64?
-
I am also a big fan of the text only web site.
+1
How to run https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer on Ubuntu 12.04.3 x64?
You have to compile it
git pull https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src/
make -f makefile.unix for detailled instructions on dependencies see this thread: http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0
(just replace primecoin with protoshares)
-
i cant get the 32bit windpws client to run.. getting runtime errors... is there a fix for this?
-
is this auto pay or manual payout?
-
git pull https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src/
make -f makefile.unix
i have used
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
ok after compiling i get this error
make: *** [obj/net.o] Error 1
ok do all like the detailed instructions on link and replace xolominer wiht ptsminer....
but when using then
./ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -poolpassword=[not-needed] -pooluser=PgQd1SEX4aBtzDYwWaXqRf6mxgCkuTvgoU -genproclimit=2
it doens't start
-bash: ./ptsminer: No such file or directory
any suggestion about the issue? it would be a pleasure
-
git pull https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src/
make -f makefile.unix
i have used
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
ok after compiling i get this error
make: *** [obj/net.o] Error 1
ok do all like the detailed instructions on link and replace xolominer wiht ptsminer....
but when using then
./ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -poolpassword=[not-needed] -pooluser=PgQd1SEX4aBtzDYwWaXqRf6mxgCkuTvgoU -genproclimit=2
it doens't start
-bash: ./ptsminer: No such file or directory
any suggestion about the issue? it would be a pleasure
Are you sure you are in the right directory?
Before running type
cd ptsminer/src
-
is this auto pay or manual payout?
its an auto payout script.
ok after compiling i get this error
make: *** [obj/net.o] Error 1
please show more output. the last line only says there was an error, not which one.
-
think i got it work with
sudo apt-get install libminiupnpc-dev -y
and compiling again
-
is this auto pay or manual payout?
its an auto payout script.
ok after compiling i get this error
make: *** [obj/net.o] Error 1
please show more output. the last line only says there was an error, not which one.
sry but this is the complete error message ...
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
i like it
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
i like it
You and I were on Alpha, how long have u been on beeer to give some feedback?
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
i like it
You and I were on Alpha, how long have u been on beeer to give some feedback?
i used it before alpha - just switched because of the other miner.
i am back since 4 hours.
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
i like it
You and I were on Alpha, how long have u been on beeer to give some feedback?
i used it before alpha - just switched because of the other miner.
i am back since 4 hours.
I c, thats good. How often is the payments? Has it gone down at all?
-
I c, thats good. How often is the payments? Has it gone down at all?
PPLNS you'll get a payment as soon as your balance reaches 1 PTS
its not easy to see your total, but i like the interface so far
-
Have you used: web:54.238.185.113?
-
is there anyone who compiled it under freebsd?
-
Have you used: web:54.238.185.113?
yes, but i didnt like the frontend and my hashrate was not that good (used it before any other pool and have never looked back - so i can't really compare)
-
I c, thats good. How often is the payments? Has it gone down at all?
Payments are processed for each block after 120 confirmations.
This server was never down and never will be.
I know this pool for quite some time now (used to mine XPM there) and it has the best infrastructure, including DDOS protection, payouts are pretty high and the owner (xolo) is some real dedicated guy (after his daughter went to bed).
any more questions? :p
-
I c, thats good. How often is the payments? Has it gone down at all?
Payments are processed for each block after 120 confirmations.
This server was never down and never will be.
I know this pool for quite some time now (used to mine XPM there) and it has the best infrastructure, including DDOS protection, payouts are pretty high and the owner (xolo) is some real dedicated guy (after his daughter went to bed).
any more questions? :p
Good to know. I am now giving it a try on all my servers. Ta
-
I c, thats good. How often is the payments? Has it gone down at all?
Payments are processed for each block after 120 confirmations.
This server was never down and never will be.
I know this pool for quite some time now (used to mine XPM there) and it has the best infrastructure, including DDOS protection, payouts are pretty high and the owner (xolo) is some real dedicated guy (after his daughter went to bed).
any more questions? :p
Agreed.
-
Looking for feedback. How is this pool guys?
Been very good so far. Op was on top of the fork before it happened and has been active in the forum helping folks with issues. So far the pool has been rock solid. I am getting some crashes on my Linux ptsminer (maybe every couple hours) but that could be my system.
I wrote this crude restart_ptsminer.sh script that runs once a minute on cron to keep it going.
#!/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
RUNNING=`ps -ef |grep ptsminer|grep -v grep`
if [ "$RUNNING" == "" ]; then
nohup ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -poolpassword=1 -pooluser=Povrejv79HQ4Fw2h2JapyyybbniUQZAhce -genproclimit=4 &
fi
-
Does anyone have osx build, I keep getting errors and would like to mine the pool with a few macs I have.
-
Thanks for this. If I'm reading this correctly then it looks like I'll never get to 1.0 PTS :(
how much hps you have ?
It shows in my previous post.
[STATS] 2013-11-10 19:59:19 | hashmeter 5.841406 hashs/min
Is that slow?
-
That's about what my i3 laptop delivers.
It will probably take you 2 days or so to mine one, but with a bit of patience you will definitely get some :)
-
I wrote this crude restart_ptsminer.sh script that runs once a minute on cron to keep it going.
Just put the miner in an endless loop.
#!/bin/bash
while true; do
./ptsminer [-options]
sleep 10
done
[STATS] 2013-11-10 19:59:19 | hashmeter 5.841406 hashs/min
Is that slow?
Yes, time to find a block mining solo: 61.77 days, Turnout: 0.6 PTS/day.
-
Could I trouble someone for the commands to pull down the source and compile on Ubuntu? (Sorry, linux noob) Thanks. 8)
(EDIT: I did try to pull down the master.zip but could not find install instructions in there...)
-
I wrote this crude restart_ptsminer.sh script that runs once a minute on cron to keep it going.
Just put the miner in an endless loop.
#!/bin/bash
while true; do
./ptsminer [-options]
sleep 10
done
Yup, that works too but my way I don't need a shell open (retrospective lame benefit..I just didn't think of the endless loop at the time).
-
small script which should help if miner crashes...it just restarts it endlessly
remember to change your payout address...
while [ true ] ; do
./ptsminer -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf -genproclimit=4
done
-
Hmmm, I haven't seen a payout in 12 hours. I did stop for a few hours, but I have been back on for at least 4 hours and haven't seen a payout. Looking at the last block (12190), I had 327 shares (.49 PTC). Anyone else having issues?
PdkDGV5hfsCb25Z32GTYVkaG1B6BCYSN8c
-
has anyone build an osx build. I installed boot and still getting stuck here
alert.cpp:6:10: fatal error: 'boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp' file not found
#include <boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp>
^
1 error generated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1
-
Hmmm, I haven't seen a payout in 12 hours. I did stop for a few hours, but I have been back on for at least 4 hours and haven't seen a payout. Looking at the last block (12190), I had 327 shares (.49 PTC). Anyone else having issues?
PdkDGV5hfsCb25Z32GTYVkaG1B6BCYSN8c
No trouble at all with payouts.
looks like you are due some, just have to wait for the confirmations. Its not like p2pool -> http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PdkDGV5hfsCb25Z32GTYVkaG1B6BCYSN8c
-
Xolokram!! looks like you have THE pool for mining PTS, its getting one block after the next. Congratz!
I switched my fleet over last night when the other nameless pool went down. Glad I did. Just having trouble with the v4 of the miner. It crashes so I have reverted to v3 for the time being.
Thanks for all your hard work on the pool and miner.
-
Confirmations are painfully slow now that the blocks are lasting longer.
-
I have Debian 7 64bit, i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 8 cores, 32G Ram
I set -genproclimit=4 and hash is 21.4+
Changed to -genproclimit=8, hash increase a little 21.5+
Change again to -genproclimit=6, has the same with proclimit 8.
Does ptsminer software has max limit in genproclimit? or it just the hash display is not accurate? because I can see in my CPU process that it uses the core.
Any info?
-
Anyone know why I am paid 0.00 PTS on all these early shares? Also, I have found nearly 1000 shares but only see a fraction of that here. Address: PqJVtLE1syCEXRhBsHntpotEj5oMFEfCTA
12079 2013-11-10 16:26:43 7 / 15509 -> 0.01694 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12067 2013-11-10 16:20:27 1 / 2927 -> 0.01282 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12063 2013-11-10 16:18:51 1 / 1193 -> 0.03146 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12062 2013-11-10 16:18:21 2 / 3843 -> 0.01953 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12055 2013-11-10 16:16:16 0 / 919 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12054 2013-11-10 16:15:47 2 / 3469 -> 0.02164 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12048 2013-11-10 16:13:53 0 / 111 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12046 2013-11-10 16:13:29 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12043 2013-11-10 16:12:34 4 / 11519 -> 0.01303 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12026 2013-11-10 16:06:28 0 / 144 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12022 2013-11-10 16:05:44 0 / 788 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12016 2013-11-10 16:04:37 0 / 2521 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12010 2013-11-10 16:02:39 0 / 5293 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12000 2013-11-10 15:59:30 0 / 3980 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11991 2013-11-10 15:56:38 0 / 2397 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11984 2013-11-10 15:54:47 1 / 4264 -> 0.00880 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11977 2013-11-10 15:52:24 1 / 2798 -> 0.01341 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11973 2013-11-10 15:50:55 1 / 9358 -> 0.00401 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11968 2013-11-10 15:47:23 0 / 61 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11967 2013-11-10 15:47:08 0 / 5166 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11961 2013-11-10 15:44:37 0 / 3620 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11957 2013-11-10 15:42:48 0 / 442 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11955 2013-11-10 15:42:20 0 / 657 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11954 2013-11-10 15:41:58 0 / 539 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11950 2013-11-10 15:41:04 0 / 1013 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11949 2013-11-10 15:40:35 1 / 3592 -> 0.01045 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11945 2013-11-10 15:38:45 0 / 2083 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11943 2013-11-10 15:37:48 0 / 1151 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11942 2013-11-10 15:37:18 0 / 7080 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11926 2013-11-10 15:32:46 0 / 2261 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11922 2013-11-10 15:31:22 0 / 1339 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11918 2013-11-10 15:30:14 0 / 3228 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11915 2013-11-10 15:28:48 0 / 267 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11913 2013-11-10 15:28:25 0 / 205 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> ORPHAN :(
11911 2013-11-10 15:28:00 0 / 3646 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11906 2013-11-10 15:26:04 0 / 754 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11904 2013-11-10 15:25:30 0 / 1498 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11902 2013-11-10 15:24:28 1 / 4345 -> 0.00864 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11873 2013-11-10 15:15:28 5 / 10708 -> 0.01752 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11820 2013-11-10 14:52:16 0 / 1002 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11813 2013-11-10 14:49:38 0 / 123 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11812 2013-11-10 14:49:13 3 / 2950 -> 0.03816 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11791 2013-11-10 14:41:10 0 / 3870 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11768 2013-11-10 14:31:17 0 / 1430 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11764 2013-11-10 14:28:54 2 / 3683 -> 0.02038 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11753 2013-11-10 14:22:10 2 / 2751 -> 0.02728 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11740 2013-11-10 14:16:26 2 / 4714 -> 0.01592 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11717 2013-11-10 14:06:56 0 / 2411 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11705 2013-11-10 14:02:04 2 / 10697 -> 0.00702 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11672 2013-11-10 13:43:58 1 / 1323 -> 0.02837 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11664 2013-11-10 13:40:40 6 / 11686 -> 0.01927 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11558 2013-11-10 12:54:17 1 / 4593 -> 0.00817 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11526 2013-11-10 12:41:48 1 / 2771 -> 0.01354 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11482 2013-11-10 12:28:51 2 / 3523 -> 0.02130 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11454 2013-11-10 12:17:48 2 / 5571 -> 0.01347 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11400 2013-11-10 11:57:46 2 / 6598 -> 0.01138 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11324 2013-11-10 11:32:57 1 / 6188 -> 0.00606 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11278 2013-11-10 11:15:04 0 / 5122 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11222 2013-11-10 10:55:01 1 / 4598 -> 0.00816 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11189 2013-11-10 10:41:59 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11177 2013-11-10 10:37:36 0 / 614 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11175 2013-11-10 10:36:23 2 / 6224 -> 0.01206 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11117 2013-11-10 10:15:35 1 / 4090 -> 0.00918 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11096 2013-11-10 10:05:18 3 / 4565 -> 0.02466 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11056 2013-11-10 09:50:30 5 / 20765 -> 0.00904 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10912 2013-11-10 08:54:55 4 / 10975 -> 0.01368 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10822 2013-11-10 08:22:15 4 / 6247 -> 0.02403 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10770 2013-11-10 08:02:17 0 / 104 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10769 2013-11-10 08:01:52 0 / 154 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10767 2013-11-10 08:01:07 1 / 7826 -> 0.00480 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10716 2013-11-10 07:40:23 4 / 6034 -> 0.02488 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10688 2013-11-10 07:27:19 2 / 9275 -> 0.00809 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10625 2013-11-10 07:03:34 3 / 8471 -> 0.01329 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10562 2013-11-10 06:38:19 6 / 12348 -> 0.01824 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10497 2013-11-10 06:10:07 0 / 2259 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10488 2013-11-10 06:05:46 2 / 6593 -> 0.01138 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10446 2013-11-10 05:49:14 7 / 18612 -> 0.01411 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10372 2013-11-10 05:12:46 0 / 129 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10368 2013-11-10 05:11:34 2 / 3295 -> 0.02278 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10356 2013-11-10 05:05:04 0 / 512 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10353 2013-11-10 05:03:34 2 / 16930 -> 0.00443 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10302 2013-11-10 04:40:23 1 / 8734 -> 0.00430 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10286 2013-11-10 04:32:54 0 / 4288 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10273 2013-11-10 04:27:35 4 / 22031 -> 0.00681 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10254 2013-11-10 04:14:04 0 / 4371 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10245 2013-11-10 04:09:47 0 / 2821 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10241 2013-11-10 04:07:33 0 / 593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10240 2013-11-10 04:07:00 0 / 2728 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10237 2013-11-10 04:05:04 0 / 4672 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10233 2013-11-10 04:02:08 0 / 1933 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10225 2013-11-10 03:59:40 1 / 4155 -> 0.00903 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10221 2013-11-10 03:56:51 0 / 2182 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10215 2013-11-10 03:53:21 1 / 905 -> 0.04147 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10207 2013-11-10 03:50:28 0 / 2529 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10201 2013-11-10 03:46:40 0 / 1309 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10197 2013-11-10 03:44:13 3 / 2630 -> 0.04281 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10190 2013-11-10 03:40:02 1 / 1732 -> 0.02167 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10183 2013-11-10 03:36:20 3 / 12795 -> 0.00880 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10141 2013-11-10 03:13:40 0 / 1999 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10131 2013-11-10 03:08:53 0 / 949 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10126 2013-11-10 03:06:23 0 / 2458 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10114 2013-11-10 03:00:28 0 / 6513 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10097 2013-11-10 02:49:06 0 / 930 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10096 2013-11-10 02:47:59 0 / 5734 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10084 2013-11-10 02:38:38 0 / 2421 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10075 2013-11-10 02:33:27 0 / 13884 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
10033 2013-11-10 02:06:03 0 / 2592 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
10024 2013-11-10 02:00:23 0 / 1233 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
10019 2013-11-10 01:57:14 0 / 2138 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
10013 2013-11-10 01:52:56 0 / 7037 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
10000 2013-11-10 01:41:04 0 / 959 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9999 2013-11-10 01:39:35 0 / 1973 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9990 2013-11-10 01:34:10 0 / 4004 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9980 2013-11-10 01:25:24 0 / 4702 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9960 2013-11-10 01:11:29 0 / 1020 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9959 2013-11-10 01:09:14 0 / 754 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9957 2013-11-10 01:07:10 0 / 16301 -> 0 PTS / 39.51 -> PAID
9937 2013-11-10 00:52:38 0 / 1159 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
9936 2013-11-10 00:51:45 0 / 2596 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
9935 2013-11-10 00:50:03 0 / 4616 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9933 2013-11-10 00:46:57 0 / 7321 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9929 2013-11-10 00:41:49 0 / 6463 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9924 2013-11-10 00:36:47 0 / 8100 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9922 2013-11-10 00:31:40 0 / 18410 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9827 2013-11-09 23:17:18 0 / 5525 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9748 2013-11-09 22:31:08 0 / 7254 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
9668 2013-11-09 21:36:21 0 / 209 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9666 2013-11-09 21:34:47 0 / 1286 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9646 2013-11-09 21:23:14 0 / 1984 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9629 2013-11-09 21:09:35 0 / 1854 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
9595 2013-11-09 20:51:24 0 / 11024 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9382 2013-11-09 18:32:51 0 / 2235 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9343 2013-11-09 17:59:28 0 / 24 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9341 2013-11-09 17:58:35 0 / 1095 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9317 2013-11-09 17:40:16 0 / 1763 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
9276 2013-11-09 17:09:29 0 / 4787 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9187 2013-11-09 15:59:11 0 / 1482 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9160 2013-11-09 15:37:27 0 / 5953 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
9008 2013-11-09 13:48:18 0 / 1934 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8931 2013-11-09 12:22:11 0 / 6955 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8709 2013-11-09 09:56:45 0 / 116 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8708 2013-11-09 09:46:49 0 / 2616 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8707 2013-11-09 09:32:54 0 / 4414 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8706 2013-11-09 09:11:41 0 / 4155 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8697 2013-11-09 08:49:45 0 / 2137 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8683 2013-11-09 08:34:48 0 / 1754 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8671 2013-11-09 08:22:25 0 / 3684 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8639 2013-11-09 07:53:02 0 / 4459 -> 0 PTS / 39.51 -> ORPHAN :(
8607 2013-11-09 07:21:23 0 / 13779 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> ORPHAN :(
8517 2013-11-09 05:39:58 0 / 8942 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8457 2013-11-09 04:32:38 0 / 1812 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8439 2013-11-09 04:15:56 0 / 2235 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8417 2013-11-09 03:54:48 0 / 4146 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8367 2013-11-09 03:10:53 0 / 198 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8364 2013-11-09 03:08:35 0 / 1842 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8342 2013-11-09 02:49:10 0 / 5103 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8295 2013-11-09 02:02:10 0 / 2805 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8275 2013-11-09 01:37:11 0 / 2711 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8241 2013-11-09 01:01:41 0 / 221 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8235 2013-11-09 00:57:06 0 / 1303 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8210 2013-11-09 00:33:12 0 / 3036 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8118 2013-11-08 23:01:52 0 / 168 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
8109 2013-11-08 22:51:44 0 / 368 -> 0 PTS / 39.50 -> PAID
-
Can you upload
ubuntu 12.04 64 bit version?
I compiled on ubuntu 13.
but not work on 12.04
-
12087 2013-11-10 16:29:19 0 / 4410 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12079 2013-11-10 16:26:43 0 / 15509 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12067 2013-11-10 16:20:27 0 / 2927 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12063 2013-11-10 16:18:51 0 / 1193 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12062 2013-11-10 16:18:21 0 / 3843 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12055 2013-11-10 16:16:16 0 / 919 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12054 2013-11-10 16:15:47 0 / 3469 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12048 2013-11-10 16:13:53 0 / 111 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12046 2013-11-10 16:13:29 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12043 2013-11-10 16:12:34 0 / 11519 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12026 2013-11-10 16:06:28 0 / 144 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12022 2013-11-10 16:05:44 0 / 788 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12016 2013-11-10 16:04:37 0 / 2521 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12010 2013-11-10 16:02:39 0 / 5293 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12000 2013-11-10 15:59:30 0 / 3980 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11991 2013-11-10 15:56:38 0 / 2397 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11984 2013-11-10 15:54:47 0 / 4264 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11977 2013-11-10 15:52:24 0 / 2798 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11973 2013-11-10 15:50:55 0 / 9358 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11968 2013-11-10 15:47:23 0 / 61 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11967 2013-11-10 15:47:08 0 / 5166 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11961 2013-11-10 15:44:37 0 / 3620 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11957 2013-11-10 15:42:48 0 / 442 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11955 2013-11-10 15:42:20 0 / 657 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11954 2013-11-10 15:41:58 0 / 539 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11950 2013-11-10 15:41:04 0 / 1013 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11949 2013-11-10 15:40:35 0 / 3592 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11945 2013-11-10 15:38:45 0 / 2083 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11943 2013-11-10 15:37:48 0 / 1151 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11942 2013-11-10 15:37:18 0 / 7080 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11926 2013-11-10 15:32:46 0 / 2261 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11922 2013-11-10 15:31:22 0 / 1339 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11918 2013-11-10 15:30:14 0 / 3228 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11915 2013-11-10 15:28:48 0 / 267 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11913 2013-11-10 15:28:25 0 / 205 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> ORPHAN :(
11911 2013-11-10 15:28:00 0 / 3646 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11906 2013-11-10 15:26:04 0 / 754 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11904 2013-11-10 15:25:30 0 / 1498 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11902 2013-11-10 15:24:28 0 / 4345 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11873 2013-11-10 15:15:28 0 / 10708 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11820 2013-11-10 14:52:16 0 / 1002 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11813 2013-11-10 14:49:38 0 / 123 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11812 2013-11-10 14:49:13 0 / 2950 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11791 2013-11-10 14:41:10 0 / 3870 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11768 2013-11-10 14:31:17 0 / 1430 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11764 2013-11-10 14:28:54 0 / 3683 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11753 2013-11-10 14:22:10 0 / 2751 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11740 2013-11-10 14:16:26 0 / 4714 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11717 2013-11-10 14:06:56 0 / 2411 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11705 2013-11-10 14:02:04 0 / 10697 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11672 2013-11-10 13:43:58 0 / 1323 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11664 2013-11-10 13:40:40 0 / 11686 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11558 2013-11-10 12:54:17 0 / 4593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11526 2013-11-10 12:41:48 0 / 2771 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11482 2013-11-10 12:28:51 0 / 3523 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11454 2013-11-10 12:17:48 0 / 5571 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11400 2013-11-10 11:57:46 0 / 6598 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11324 2013-11-10 11:32:57 0 / 6188 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11278 2013-11-10 11:15:04 0 / 5122 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11222 2013-11-10 10:55:01 0 / 4598 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11189 2013-11-10 10:41:59 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11177 2013-11-10 10:37:36 0 / 614 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11175 2013-11-10 10:36:23 0 / 6224 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11117 2013-11-10 10:15:35 0 / 4090 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11096 2013-11-10 10:05:18 0 / 4565 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11056 2013-11-10 09:50:30 0 / 20765 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10912 2013-11-10 08:54:55 0 / 10975 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10822 2013-11-10 08:22:15 0 / 6247 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10770 2013-11-10 08:02:17 0 / 104 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10769 2013-11-10 08:01:52 0 / 154 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10767 2013-11-10 08:01:07 0 / 7826 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10716 2013-11-10 07:40:23 0 / 6034 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10688 2013-11-10 07:27:19 0 / 9275 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10625 2013-11-10 07:03:34 0 / 8471 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10562 2013-11-10 06:38:19 0 / 12348 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10497 2013-11-10 06:10:07 0 / 2259 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10488 2013-11-10 06:05:46 0 / 6593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10446 2013-11-10 05:49:14 0 / 18612 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10372 2013-11-10 05:12:46 0 / 129 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10368 2013-11-10 05:11:34 0 / 3295 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10356 2013-11-10 05:05:04 0 / 512 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10353 2013-11-10 05:03:34 0 / 16930 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10302 2013-11-10 04:40:23 0 / 8734 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10286 2013-11-10 04:32:54 0 / 4288 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10273 2013-11-10 04:27:35 0 / 22031 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10254 2013-11-10 04:14:04 0 / 4371 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10245 2013-11-10 04:09:47 0 / 2821 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10241 2013-11-10 04:07:33 0 / 593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10240 2013-11-10 04:07:00 0 / 2728 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10237 2013-11-10 04:05:04 0 / 4672 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10233 2013-11-10 04:02:08 0 / 1933 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10225 2013-11-10 03:59:40 0 / 4155 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10221 2013-11-10 03:56:51 0 / 2182 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10215 2013-11-10 03:53:21 0 / 905 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10207 2013-11-10 03:50:28 0 / 2529 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10201 2013-11-10 03:46:40 0 / 1309 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10197 2013-11-10 03:44:13 0 / 2630 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10190 2013-11-10 03:40:02 0 / 1732 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10183 2013-11-10 03:36:20 0 / 12795 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10141 2013-11-10 03:13:40 0 / 1999 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10131 2013-11-10 03:08:53 0 / 949 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10126 2013-11-10 03:06:23 0 / 2458 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10114 2013-11-10 03:00:28 0 / 6513 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
-
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
Are you sure you're using the correct miner? connected to the right website (it's very hard to get the right number of e's when typing in the url)? Have you enabled enough threads?
Have you seen your miner say the thing about shares being accepted?
-
had a "forced reconnect" error over night and it stopped mining.
win 7 v0.4 x64
-
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
Are you sure you're using the correct miner? connected to the right website (it's very hard to get the right number of e's when typing in the url)? Have you enabled enough threads?
Have you seen your miner say the thing about shares being accepted?
Pretty sure I am....if I was connecting to the wrong website or have my shares not accepted, you would not be seeing the paste info above as my user ID will not appear on be^5's website.
EDIT : ptsminer_64bit.exe -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 -pooluser=PebS8z8DBDPHVBBftk3QreUmfpWWwJ9Fb6 -genproclimit=5
and it is the 64bit version pasted on the first post of this thread.
EDIT 2 : hm, just got my first "payment" and I see the difference in data between all my previous zeros. Perhaps the "accept" on the cmd screen is not really "accept" in terms of doing actual work. (I don't know how to explain it -_-" )Am i making sense? If so, what were all those accepts? O_O
-
12087 2013-11-10 16:29:19 0 / 4410 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12079 2013-11-10 16:26:43 0 / 15509 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12067 2013-11-10 16:20:27 0 / 2927 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12063 2013-11-10 16:18:51 0 / 1193 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12062 2013-11-10 16:18:21 0 / 3843 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12055 2013-11-10 16:16:16 0 / 919 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12054 2013-11-10 16:15:47 0 / 3469 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12048 2013-11-10 16:13:53 0 / 111 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12046 2013-11-10 16:13:29 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12043 2013-11-10 16:12:34 0 / 11519 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12026 2013-11-10 16:06:28 0 / 144 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12022 2013-11-10 16:05:44 0 / 788 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12016 2013-11-10 16:04:37 0 / 2521 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12010 2013-11-10 16:02:39 0 / 5293 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
12000 2013-11-10 15:59:30 0 / 3980 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11991 2013-11-10 15:56:38 0 / 2397 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11984 2013-11-10 15:54:47 0 / 4264 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11977 2013-11-10 15:52:24 0 / 2798 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11973 2013-11-10 15:50:55 0 / 9358 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11968 2013-11-10 15:47:23 0 / 61 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11967 2013-11-10 15:47:08 0 / 5166 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11961 2013-11-10 15:44:37 0 / 3620 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11957 2013-11-10 15:42:48 0 / 442 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11955 2013-11-10 15:42:20 0 / 657 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11954 2013-11-10 15:41:58 0 / 539 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11950 2013-11-10 15:41:04 0 / 1013 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11949 2013-11-10 15:40:35 0 / 3592 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11945 2013-11-10 15:38:45 0 / 2083 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11943 2013-11-10 15:37:48 0 / 1151 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11942 2013-11-10 15:37:18 0 / 7080 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11926 2013-11-10 15:32:46 0 / 2261 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11922 2013-11-10 15:31:22 0 / 1339 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11918 2013-11-10 15:30:14 0 / 3228 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11915 2013-11-10 15:28:48 0 / 267 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11913 2013-11-10 15:28:25 0 / 205 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> ORPHAN :(
11911 2013-11-10 15:28:00 0 / 3646 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11906 2013-11-10 15:26:04 0 / 754 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11904 2013-11-10 15:25:30 0 / 1498 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11902 2013-11-10 15:24:28 0 / 4345 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11873 2013-11-10 15:15:28 0 / 10708 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11820 2013-11-10 14:52:16 0 / 1002 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11813 2013-11-10 14:49:38 0 / 123 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11812 2013-11-10 14:49:13 0 / 2950 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11791 2013-11-10 14:41:10 0 / 3870 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11768 2013-11-10 14:31:17 0 / 1430 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11764 2013-11-10 14:28:54 0 / 3683 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11753 2013-11-10 14:22:10 0 / 2751 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11740 2013-11-10 14:16:26 0 / 4714 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11717 2013-11-10 14:06:56 0 / 2411 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11705 2013-11-10 14:02:04 0 / 10697 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11672 2013-11-10 13:43:58 0 / 1323 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11664 2013-11-10 13:40:40 0 / 11686 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11558 2013-11-10 12:54:17 0 / 4593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11526 2013-11-10 12:41:48 0 / 2771 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11482 2013-11-10 12:28:51 0 / 3523 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11454 2013-11-10 12:17:48 0 / 5571 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11400 2013-11-10 11:57:46 0 / 6598 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11324 2013-11-10 11:32:57 0 / 6188 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11278 2013-11-10 11:15:04 0 / 5122 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11222 2013-11-10 10:55:01 0 / 4598 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11189 2013-11-10 10:41:59 0 / 1328 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11177 2013-11-10 10:37:36 0 / 614 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11175 2013-11-10 10:36:23 0 / 6224 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11117 2013-11-10 10:15:35 0 / 4090 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11096 2013-11-10 10:05:18 0 / 4565 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
11056 2013-11-10 09:50:30 0 / 20765 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10912 2013-11-10 08:54:55 0 / 10975 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10822 2013-11-10 08:22:15 0 / 6247 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10770 2013-11-10 08:02:17 0 / 104 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10769 2013-11-10 08:01:52 0 / 154 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10767 2013-11-10 08:01:07 0 / 7826 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10716 2013-11-10 07:40:23 0 / 6034 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10688 2013-11-10 07:27:19 0 / 9275 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10625 2013-11-10 07:03:34 0 / 8471 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10562 2013-11-10 06:38:19 0 / 12348 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10497 2013-11-10 06:10:07 0 / 2259 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10488 2013-11-10 06:05:46 0 / 6593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10446 2013-11-10 05:49:14 0 / 18612 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10372 2013-11-10 05:12:46 0 / 129 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10368 2013-11-10 05:11:34 0 / 3295 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10356 2013-11-10 05:05:04 0 / 512 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10353 2013-11-10 05:03:34 0 / 16930 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10302 2013-11-10 04:40:23 0 / 8734 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10286 2013-11-10 04:32:54 0 / 4288 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10273 2013-11-10 04:27:35 0 / 22031 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10254 2013-11-10 04:14:04 0 / 4371 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10245 2013-11-10 04:09:47 0 / 2821 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10241 2013-11-10 04:07:33 0 / 593 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10240 2013-11-10 04:07:00 0 / 2728 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10237 2013-11-10 04:05:04 0 / 4672 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10233 2013-11-10 04:02:08 0 / 1933 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10225 2013-11-10 03:59:40 0 / 4155 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10221 2013-11-10 03:56:51 0 / 2182 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10215 2013-11-10 03:53:21 0 / 905 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10207 2013-11-10 03:50:28 0 / 2529 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10201 2013-11-10 03:46:40 0 / 1309 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10197 2013-11-10 03:44:13 0 / 2630 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10190 2013-11-10 03:40:02 0 / 1732 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10183 2013-11-10 03:36:20 0 / 12795 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10141 2013-11-10 03:13:40 0 / 1999 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10131 2013-11-10 03:08:53 0 / 949 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10126 2013-11-10 03:06:23 0 / 2458 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
10114 2013-11-10 03:00:28 0 / 6513 -> 0 PTS / 37.53 -> PAID
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
I also have a night, not a single payment
-
EDIT 2 : hm, just got my first "payment" and I see the difference in data between all my previous zeros. Perhaps the "accept" on the cmd screen is not really "accept" in terms of doing actual work. (I don't know how to explain it -_-" )Am i making sense? If so, what were all those accepts? O_O
I also see a lot more accepted shares in the client than I see on the stats page
-
sorry, but what is wrong with some of you? on every user page and on the first post of this thread (which i recommend for everyone) it says:
your payouts will be executed, when blocks are confirmed & you reach at least 1.0 PTS
and in addition
check the latest confirmed payout ('next' field) for you current balance
please, before complaining: check your stats against these statesments
- xolokram
ps. sorry, i'm off to work now - i'll be back later today, looking into the problems (the actual problems, not of some users rumbling about "no" payouts) posted here
pps. if you want to show us your user stats, please just post the link, i dont want to see those lists in the thread, it's just painful
-
Could I trouble someone for the commands to pull down the source and compile on Ubuntu? (Sorry, linux noob) Thanks. 8)
(EDIT: I did try to pull down the master.zip but could not find install instructions in there...)
try this guide http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0
and replace xolominer with ptsminer https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
I wrote this crude restart_ptsminer.sh script that runs once a minute on cron to keep it going.
Just put the miner in an endless loop.
#!/bin/bash
while true; do
./ptsminer [-options]
sleep 10
done
Yup, that works too but my way I don't need a shell open (retrospective lame benefit..I just didn't think of the endless loop at the time).
I'm running them inside a screen session, so no problem with that :)
Confirmations are painfully slow now that the blocks are lasting longer.
Current confirmation time is between 10 and 14 hours due to slow blocktime varying between 5 and 7 minutes :(
Anyone know why I am paid 0.00 PTS on all these early shares? Also, I have found nearly 1000 shares but only see a fraction of that here. Address: PqJVtLE1syCEXRhBsHntpotEj5oMFEfCTA
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
I also have a night, not a single payment
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
-
maybe i should decrease that threshold again
that new difficulty.....
-
Could I trouble someone for the commands to pull down the source and compile on Ubuntu? (Sorry, linux noob) Thanks. 8)
(EDIT: I did try to pull down the master.zip but could not find install instructions in there...)
try this guide http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0
and replace xolominer with ptsminer https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
I wrote this crude restart_ptsminer.sh script that runs once a minute on cron to keep it going.
Just put the miner in an endless loop.
#!/bin/bash
while true; do
./ptsminer [-options]
sleep 10
done
Yup, that works too but my way I don't need a shell open (retrospective lame benefit..I just didn't think of the endless loop at the time).
I'm running them inside a screen session, so no problem with that :)
Confirmations are painfully slow now that the blocks are lasting longer.
Current confirmation time is between 10 and 14 hours due to slow blocktime varying between 5 and 7 minutes :(
Anyone know why I am paid 0.00 PTS on all these early shares? Also, I have found nearly 1000 shares but only see a fraction of that here. Address: PqJVtLE1syCEXRhBsHntpotEj5oMFEfCTA
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
Like the user above, I have the same issue. And I have been paid ZERO on all confirmed. not even 0.0001PTS like the user above. Anyone else having the same issue?
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
I also have a night, not a single payment
Did you reach the 1 PTS payout threshold?
no
-
I had the same problem so I generated a new address and started over after 12 hours. I guess I lose all that work then.
It's not that there is something "wrong with us" it's that some of this stuff is not obvious. Some of us are n00bs and are just trying to figure it out.
Thank you xolokram for all the hard work. But please baby-step some of the confusing stuff down. For instance how do i actually check what my current account balance is to see if it's near 1.0 PTS? What does this mean -- it's cryptic to me: "check the latest confirmed payout ('next' field) for you current balance" -- I could next find any "next field". Sorry if this sounds dumb but I'm not getting it.
sorry, but what is wrong with some of you? on every user page and on the first post of this thread (which i recommend for everyone) it says:
your payouts will be executed, when blocks are confirmed & you reach at least 1.0 PTS
and in addition
check the latest confirmed payout ('next' field) for you current balance
please, before complaining: check your stats against these statesments
- xolokram
ps. sorry, i'm off to work now - i'll be back later today, looking into the problems (the actual problems, not of some users rumbling about "no" payouts) posted here
pps. if you want to show us your user stats, please just post the link, i dont want to see those lists in the thread, it's just painful
-
maybe i should decrease that threshold again
that new difficulty.....
yeah, 0.1 please
-
@svd:
i think i will decrease it slowly, i dont want to have hundreds of payouts on every payout iteration.
so i think 0.5 will be next, probably followed by 0.3 or 0.2 and then 0.1 if necessary.
@btc2084:
ok, i'm sorry. i'm just a little bit angry that no one was able to ask "how do i see my current balance?", but everybody seems to be able to argue about "i have not been paid, i want it naaaooowww"!!
i'm thinking about a way to check for abandoned payout addresses and forcing a payout to this address without the payout treshold after a specific amount of idle time (X days)
ULTIMATE GUIDE TO YOUR CURRENT BALANCE:
1) go to the payout list -> http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payouts
2) go to the latest payout (that's the one with the highest number, at the top of the page)
3) the next page your see (the payout information):
there are four fields you see which (can) contain (a lot of) addresses and associated values
these four fields are "prev", "add", "payout" and "next" (in this order)
4) go to the "next" field (doing so by searching for the term 'next', it should be at the end of the page)
5) now search for your personal address in this particular field
6) the value you see next to your address within the 'next' field is your current balance for all your submitted shares since your last payout
-
Hi,
I'm slightly worried. I'm certain I will have worked over 1PTS but no payment this morning.
Can you please check?
Pv6sxYhTivSa6NA3Ak5oaNMS7nepEk29Ax
Thanks
-
Is the "forced to reconnect" error related to http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=420.0 the command-line bug?
-
@NineLives:
you can check this yourself: http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pv6sxYhTivSa6NA3Ak5oaNMS7nepEk29Ax
what does the most recent (the ones on the top of the page) say?
hint: the last part is the most important for you
@favdesu:
this is mostly caused by connection problems on the miner side, i think the bug bytemaster is relating to is something else, the original mining code (which ptsminer is using too) is crashing occasionally...
reminder to myself: change the 'PAID' label on the user stats to 'ADDED TO BALANCE' if just added and add a 'current balance' info for every user...
-
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
-
I also have been mining away the last 15 hours at about 18 hash, and not a single payout. Don't know exact number as I closed it once in the time, but I should have over 300 VL. My user overview shows, oh, I say 60 found blocks, but every one of them is marked "block waiting for confirmations". What is wrong and what can I do about it? :(
My user address is Pa86GRGGT3WiDZNb8mQ97M2SA2BFBUrgKo in case anyone wants to see for themselves.
-
I also have been mining away the last 15 hours at about 18 hash, and not a single payout. Don't know exact number as I closed it once in the time, but I should have over 300 VL. My user overview shows, oh, I say 60 found blocks, but every one of them is marked "block waiting for confirmations". What is wrong and what can I do about it? :(
My user address is Pa86GRGGT3WiDZNb8mQ97M2SA2BFBUrgKo in case anyone wants to see for themselves.
I also had this query but xolo explained it all. Read back from page 11 and you will find the answers to your query..
-
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
from wich page the get the stats? beer? its wrong then i guess.. there are some blocks numbers that beer never solved..
-
is there anything out how much the pps on this pool is!? just curious ..
-
I also have been mining away the last 15 hours at about 18 hash, and not a single payout. Don't know exact number as I closed it once in the time, but I should have over 300 VL. My user overview shows, oh, I say 60 found blocks, but every one of them is marked "block waiting for confirmations". What is wrong and what can I do about it? :(
My user address is Pa86GRGGT3WiDZNb8mQ97M2SA2BFBUrgKo in case anyone wants to see for themselves.
I also had this query but xolo explained it all. Read back from page 11 and you will find the answers to your query..
You need to wait until the blocks are confirmed by the network. This takes 120 blocks, at current block time of 5-7 min this may take 10-14 hours. There is nothing xolo can do about, you cant pay out blocks before they are confirmed.
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
from wich page the get the stats? beer? its wrong then i guess.. there are some blocks numbers that beer never solved..
From the /user page on beeeeer.org, note it does not calculates the results of unconfirmed blocks.
is there anything out how much the pps on this pool is!? just curious ..
The payout system is "proportional". You get the % of shares you submitted. Example: Reward = 35 PTS, 15000 Shares are submitted to solve a block, you submitted 150 (1%) and you will get 1% of the reward = 0.35 PTS.
-
please implement pps or pplns
prop is just begging for cheaters
-
thank you, donschoe, you're really a great help.
i will decrease the payout treshold to 0.5 PTS now (this will kick in with the next payout) in roughly 2.5 hours
@flower1024:
this would take some time for the implementation & the monitoring is more time intensive. i will think about it, but I have a lot more things on my todo list (including the XPM pool), we'll see.
i know that proportional payout is not flawless, but what exactly do you mean by 'cheaters'? you just mean pool hopping?
- xolokram
-
Ok thanks ssshhh and donshoe, guess it must just be taking this long now because of reduced payout and increased block time. So I will patiently wait ;)
-
thank you, donschoe, you're really a great help.
i will decrease the payout treshold to 0.5 PTS now (this will kick in with the next payout)
@flower1024:
this would take some time for the implementation & the monitoring is more time intensive. i will think about it, but I have a lot more things on my todo list (including the XPM pool), we'll see.
btw. what exactly do you mean by 'cheaters' ?
- xolokram
pool hoppers ;)
its possile to calculate how much time each share on your pool takes. so you know the average time your pool needs to find a block at any given difficulty.
just mine 41% of this time - then switch to another pool or solo.
as soon as your pool finds a block repeat it again.
i did it with bitcoin a while ago and the effect is that any hopper gets much more and your honest miners suffer from small blocks (and have to do the work on the big blocks alone)
see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24966.0
-
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
from wich page the get the stats? beer? its wrong then i guess.. there are some blocks numbers that beer never solved..
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payouts parsing all payouts, adding up the "add" for your address so what you are saying should be impossible :)
-
I also have been mining away the last 15 hours at about 18 hash, and not a single payout. Don't know exact number as I closed it once in the time, but I should have over 300 VL. My user overview shows, oh, I say 60 found blocks, but every one of them is marked "block waiting for confirmations". What is wrong and what can I do about it? :(
My user address is Pa86GRGGT3WiDZNb8mQ97M2SA2BFBUrgKo in case anyone wants to see for themselves.
I also had this query but xolo explained it all. Read back from page 11 and you will find the answers to your query..
You need to wait until the blocks are confirmed by the network. This takes 120 blocks, at current block time of 5-7 min this may take 10-14 hours. There is nothing xolo can do about, you cant pay out blocks before they are confirmed.
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
from wich page the get the stats? beer? its wrong then i guess.. there are some blocks numbers that beer never solved..
From the /user page on beeeeer.org, note it does not calculates the results of unconfirmed blocks.
is there anything out how much the pps on this pool is!? just curious ..
The payout system is "proportional". You get the % of shares you submitted. Example: Reward = 35 PTS, 15000 Shares are submitted to solve a block, you submitted 150 (1%) and you will get 1% of the reward = 0.35 PTS.
ok cool thx for your fast reply... sry for another question ... is there a opportunity that miners are active when closing the ssh terminal windows and when iam not online? Sry for noobing question .. want to learn ...
Best
cassiopaia
-
ok cool thx for your fast reply... sry for another question ... is there a opportunity that miners are active when closing the ssh terminal windows and when iam not online? Sry for noobing question .. want to learn ...
Best
cassiopaia
Install screen and run it via screen, detach is ctrl a d and after login screen -r brings it back up.
-
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
Thanks for this!
-
changed the payout treshold to 0.5 pts
- xolokram
-
I wasn't question the payout really but it did sounded that way. I do however think some of the people here have the same question and perhaps I *think* I have figured it out how to ask the right way.
12173 2013-11-10 23:52:25 0 / 75323 -> 0 PTS / 35.65 -> PAID
I was "paid" 0 for this because I did no work on this block.
12116 2013-11-10 17:49:03 24 / 63729 -> 0.01343 PTS / 35.65 -> PAID
I was "paid" 0.01343 PTS because I worked 24/63729 on this block. 35.65/63727*24 = 0.01343
Now my question is if it was something that I did no work on, why is it showing up on my log? And going through my ptsminer, I see I have accepted a lot more work than what it actually shows on the website. If it is that case, does the accepted work on the ptsminer really means differently from the way it is calculated on the website? For 3 days of mining, i have less then 1PTS of balance on my account (not payout). Yes, I was aware of the 1PTS min before payout.
I hope my question is a little clearer now. Like someone who posted a couple before me, I am relatively new to this whole mining thing and still trying to figure things out as to what are the things that shows up on my screen really means and to make corrections if I am really doing something wrong.
EDIT : the new info on users looks a lot of user friendly. Thank you ^^ My previous might have become irreverent, if so, just ignore it.
-
Basic payout stats:
http://pts.syware.de/
Thanks Sy, this works great. Its nice to see totals to date as well.
-
Been mining now for around 2 hours. Still can't find my Adress at http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout
It's been 7-8 new lists since i started and none contain my adress.
Am i missing something? Any possible places to search for errors if so?
-
Been mining now for around 2 hours. Still can't find my Adress at http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout
It's been 7-8 new lists since i started and none contain my adress.
Am i missing something? Any possible places to search for errors if so?
It only looks into paid shares, current mature time is around 13h - that's when your work will start to show up.
-
if anyone else is having issues building for osx, here is what I had to do to get it to build.
1) cd /tmp
2) xcode-select –install
3) sudo xcodebuild -license
4) curl -O https://distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
5) tar xf MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
6) cd MacPorts-2.2.1/
7) ./configure
8) make
9) sudo make install
10) sudo port selfupdate
11) sudo port install boost db48@+no_java openssl miniupnpc (this takes awhile, almost an hour)
12) git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
13) cd ptsminer/src
14) make –f makefile.osx
Edit: one of my co-workers needed to download the command line tool for Xcode. So if step 2 doesn't work, that maybe why.
-
Ah. Okey that explains it.
What's a decent hash/min?
Mine keeps jumping from 3-9 on a I5-3570.
-
Hello xolokram.
Seems i had been mining with the old client and accepting alot of shares lol
Is there a way to backtrack and xfer the pts from them?
PYoeV73D2VsY8HQYmHXECoFUksoxzW9vxA
I have switch my clients to the new one .
Let me know
thanks!
NVMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
All waiting confirmations LOL
-
hi xolokram,
why user site is changed to display no pts amounts anymore?
Or just working on it?
edit: works now again : :) thx man
-
64 bits version 0.4:
The requested URL "/8xbrmn816lzg/27ru4xilwf6lnf4/ptsminer_v04_x64.zip", is invalid.
32 bits is working
-
@atta2k15:
where do you get the "url" from?
-
xolokram
12396 2013-11-11 21:46:08 4 / 644 -> 0.22144 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12395 2013-11-11 21:45:38 58 / 44194 -> 0.04679 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12389 2013-11-11 21:33:31 34 / 22064 -> 0.05494 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12387 2013-11-11 21:27:54 39 / 26621 -> 0.05223 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
this for payouts are not on my balance on user stats!? Any idea why this? Fb would be nice
balance only shows confirmed blocks
-
xolokram
12396 2013-11-11 21:46:08 4 / 644 -> 0.22144 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12395 2013-11-11 21:45:38 58 / 44194 -> 0.04679 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12389 2013-11-11 21:33:31 34 / 22064 -> 0.05494 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
12387 2013-11-11 21:27:54 39 / 26621 -> 0.05223 PTS / 35.65 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
this for payouts are not on my balance on user stats!? Any idea why this? Fb would be nice
balance only shows confirmed blocks
yes thx .. was my mistake .. sry
-
Thanks to author for the work
I starts to get my payments now.
-
btw.
i think i will increase the payout treshold again.
0.5 is creating way too much 'dust' (with ~40 of ~600 paid user per payout every ~20 minutes).
i think a value between 2 and 5 PTS should be fine.
- xolokram
ps. we can discuss this here, please keep calm & think about it before posting "i'll need my payoutz0r; dis sucks!!!!!11! LOL" ;)
-
Hey xolo,
I don't want to step on any toes, but does this seem normal?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvNDWHTzEke8Hhdyds52qgZEZ82RpUbUdW
They started out small and now they are raking in 10 PTS every block...
I don't mean to be a snitch....
-
2829 shares in 2 min WTF??? botnet? server farm? whoa!!!
-
I've only received like 20 PTS in 24 hours with 20 quod core cpu's running at it?
-
Nice work, now everything works great :D
-
btw.
i think i will increase the payout treshold again.
0.5 is creating way too much 'dust' (with ~40 of ~600 paid user per payout every ~20 minutes).
i think a value between 2 and 5 PTS should be fine.
- xolokram
ps. we can discuss this here, please keep calm & think about it before posting "i'll need my payoutz0r; dis sucks!!!!!11! LOL" ;)
I'll respect your decision but it will be a disincentive for people like me who don't run latest/high-end equipment. I was able to get my first payout of 0.5PTS after several hours of mining and I am happy with it. I'd definitely prefer the payout to be 0.5 and not increased, just because with my hardware, I might just have to stop mining soon and want the wasted hashpower to be minimal. A lower payout will give others an incentive to join your pool as opposed to other pools as well. Just my two cents.
-
Once you have time to do more than fiddle with parameters you should consider just adding a minimum time between payouts to the payout script.
-
I've only received like 20 PTS in 24 hours with 20 quod core cpu's running at it?
I wonder how many hpm you average quad core cpu gives?
my fx8320- 17-20hpm -8core
i3-mobile(2.5Ghz)-7-9hpm -4core
If some one gets stats post it here please too
-
Hey xolo,
I don't want to step on any toes, but does this seem normal?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvNDWHTzEke8Hhdyds52qgZEZ82RpUbUdW
They started out small and now they are raking in 10 PTS every block...
I don't mean to be a snitch....
woah when iam seeing my share rate with 10 x 2 cpu then this must like 3000 x 2cpu devices.. strange ...
-
Hey xolo,
I don't want to step on any toes, but does this seem normal?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvNDWHTzEke8Hhdyds52qgZEZ82RpUbUdW
They started out small and now they are raking in 10 PTS every block...
I don't mean to be a snitch....
woah when iam seeing my share rate with 10 x 2 cpu then this must like 3000 x 2cpu devices.. strange ...
True, they are taking about 12.5PTS per block, they are also finding a lot of blocks for us. So don't complain, it is in our favor to get most of the blocks on the network.
-
btw.
i think i will increase the payout treshold again.
0.5 is creating way too much 'dust' (with ~40 of ~600 paid user per payout every ~20 minutes).
i think a value between 2 and 5 PTS should be fine.
- xolokram
ps. we can discuss this here, please keep calm & think about it before posting "i'll need my payoutz0r; dis sucks!!!!!11! LOL" ;)
I'll respect your decision but it will be a disincentive for people like me who don't run latest/high-end equipment. I was able to get my first payout of 0.5PTS after several hours of mining and I am happy with it. I'd definitely prefer the payout to be 0.5 and not increased, just because with my hardware, I might just have to stop mining soon and want the wasted hashpower to be minimal. A lower payout will give others an incentive to join your pool as opposed to other pools as well. Just my two cents.
I'm also mining with low end hardware and just got my first 0.5 PTS. I'd also prefer at least 0.5 payout.
-
Why not send ptss？
-
Why not send ptss？
Why not ask question phrasing your issue? Let me guess :D
- Did you reach the 0.5 PTS payout threshold?
- Did you mine for at least 10 hours until the blocks are confirmed and payout?
- Did you even read the first post?
-
Confirmations seem to have stopped at block 12351.
19 new blocks have been found since that block was confirmed and paid out, but no confirmations have happened since then. (at least on my payout screen)
Any idea whats up?
-
Confirmations seem to have stopped at block 12351.
19 new blocks have been found since that block was confirmed and paid out, but no confirmations have happened since then. (at least on my payout screen)
Any idea whats up?
Same for me.
-
Nice work, now everything works great :D
unfortunately not. the payout script stopped at payout #12351, i'll look into this issue asap.
dont panic, the blocks & payouts are safe, they are just not executed yet.
/edit:
ok, i know why it stopped, everything will be alright, i'll fix it. (until the next bug appears!) :)
i changed the payout treshold back to 1.0 PTS
- xolokram
ps. it's not unlikely that there are some 'big players' using the pool
pps. if the PvNDWHTzEke8Hhdyds52qgZEZ82RpUbUdW guy is lurking around in the forum, maybe you can PM me here?
-
Hopefully your dealing with issue, ive checked my stats and see a lot of unclonfirmed even dfrom 9.11 :D hehe
-
the 'stuck' payouts are not executed all at once.
i encountered an other problem, let me fix that quick.
-
no problem, i was just asking. Does anybody know when online exchangers will add pts?
-
Is not it being ddos? ? ? ?
-
ok, done, payouts incoming.
@tyzq2:
welcome to my ignore list
-
ok, done, payouts incoming.
@tyzq2:
welcome to my ignore list
ignore？？？？？What am I doing wrong?
-
ok, done, payouts incoming.
@tyzq2:
welcome to my ignore list
I was using Google translator to talk to you。I can not quite understand what you mean
-
Hello!
I'm all new to this and was wondering from the stats i've gathered i see:
Last 100 payments:
Block Date Total Add Diff Balance
12422 12.11. 0:41 0.92 +0.0104 0.00012097 0.9239
12421 12.11. 0:38 0.91 +0.009 0.00012097 0.9136
12419 12.11. 0:32 0.9 +0.0155 0.00012097 0.9046
12418 12.11. 0:27 0.88 +0.0182 0.00012097 0.8891
12417 12.11. 0:26 0.86 +0.0162 0.00012097 0.8709
12414 12.11. 0:03 0.85 +0.0263 0.00012097 0.8547
12413 12.11. 0:01 0.82 +0.0207 0.00012097 0.8284
Is the balance the ammount of protoshares i've mined so far? What are the numbers on the far right side?
Im mining away on 2 computers but my vallet doesn't seem to get any profit. (Started around 24 hours ago now.) How long does it usually take for the gathered ammount ot be transfered to the vallet?
Thanks in advance!
-
@andhar:
your personal payouts are executed, when you reach 1.0 pts (that's the value aka balance on the right side of Sy's stats)
@Sy:
can you add an information about the payout threshold to your stats?
(altough it's not 100% clear what exact value we'll use atm)
- xolokram
-
Thanks a lot for the explanation!
A lot of helpful folks on this forum :D
-
Hey, I have the address PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843
My /user/ page isn't working - although I do appear in the other lists.
-
AHHHH good (or actually not so good for you ;D)
the other 'lists' (payout & block) have a 's' added to the address, thus your miner is connecting with this address
PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843s
see http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843s
PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843s is not a valid PTS address
i'm able to change that address (remove the 's' to fix the payout to this address), give me some time, i'm currently at work
but please change your miner configuration & reconnect to the server first
/edit: i just digged through the whole log history...
Pnz6TREc5pKWLsZEZiS4iqDoVB92E3Zrcz
PjY4znBjpWeB1FacVno7Xj5MVMTdR1PQ2K
PoiV9CUbxj51AtjQFLti84QCbNHxT57x1T] <-- pls stop mining on that address
are broken too :-\ check your miners/wallets configuration, please & write here or PM me
-
Sorry about that, fixed it now. It now says
PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843
Thanks.
-
xolo could you add this 200% speed boost to ptsminer?
By Popular Demand I have decided to publish my updates to the momentum search method: http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/momentum.cpp
Now go and make it better and decentralized!
-
@Sy:
can you add an information about the payout threshold to your stats?
(altough it's not 100% clear what exact value we'll use atm)
- xolokram
No more treshold, if add -> address is set and no next -> address a payout happened and i get payout -> address and mark it as paid.
So i don't have to change anything no matter what you set :)
-
xolo could you add this 200% speed boost to ptsminer?
By Popular Demand I have decided to publish my updates to the momentum search method: http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/momentum.cpp
Now go and make it better and decentralized!
Seconded. The pool will fall behind without it!
-
xolo could you add this 200% speed boost to ptsminer?
By Popular Demand I have decided to publish my updates to the momentum search method: http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/momentum.cpp
Now go and make it better and decentralized!
Edit: It seems to need his "fast compile" software: https://github.com/bytemaster/fc
-
Edit: It seems to need his "fast compile" software: https://github.com/bytemaster/fc
Thanks I was looking for this.
Edit: this version is very outdated.
Edit2: this one is the most current one, https://github.com/InvictusInnovations/fc
-
Edit: It seems to need his "fast compile" software: https://github.com/bytemaster/fc
Thanks I was looking for this.
Edit: this version is very outdated.
Edit2: this one is the most current one, https://github.com/InvictusInnovations/fc
Good find. Am I the only one that thinks this surprise 3x mining speed patch seems a bit...odd? I dunno...just has my spidey senses tingling.
-
Good find. Am I the only one that thinks this surprise 3x mining speed patch seems a bit...odd? I dunno...just has my spidey senses tingling.
No I've been wondering about this right from the start. Haveing trouble to build the fc library. Meh,
-
Good find. Am I the only one that thinks this surprise 3x mining speed patch seems a bit...odd? I dunno...just has my spidey senses tingling.
No I've been wondering about this right from the start. Haveing trouble to build the fc library. Meh,
I had to do a apt-get install cmake* and then cmake from the root fc-phenoex directory. It seems to use the CMakeLists.txt file. Then you need to do a cmake install_<something>. Sorry, not on the machine I built it on right now.
This helped: http://web.cs.swarthmore.edu/~adanner/tips/cmake.php
-
i just got home, i'll look into the code/miner.
@bobbahope:
good. i'll add PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843s's PTS to PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843
- xolokram
ps. btw my ptsminer is 13.37 times faster than every laundry machine in terms of "shenanigans per minute"
-
Xolokram,
If it wasn't someone with your reputation -- which not all user's know of -- the whole miner might seem like a big scam. But we know you aren't in that business, at least most of us do.
I've been mining pts for I think two+ days and still nothing shows up in the wallet.
Update: I upgraded to 2.0 Protoshares and all the pts balance showed up properly! Sorry for the hassle, esp. when the issue had nothing to do with the pool. It was the wallet problem the whole time.
@svd:
i think i will decrease it slowly, i dont want to have hundreds of payouts on every payout iteration.
so i think 0.5 will be next, probably followed by 0.3 or 0.2 and then 0.1 if necessary.
@btc2084:
ok, i'm sorry. i'm just a little bit angry that no one was able to ask "how do i see my current balance?", but everybody seems to be able to argue about "i have not been paid, i want it naaaooowww"!!
i'm thinking about a way to check for abandoned payout addresses and forcing a payout to this address without the payout treshold after a specific amount of idle time (X days)
ULTIMATE GUIDE TO YOUR CURRENT BALANCE:
1) go to the payout list -> http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payouts
2) go to the latest payout (that's the one with the highest number, at the top of the page)
3) the next page your see (the payout information):
there are four fields you see which (can) contain (a lot of) addresses and associated values
these four fields are "prev", "add", "payout" and "next" (in this order)
4) go to the "next" field (doing so by searching for the term 'next', it should be at the end of the page)
5) now search for your personal address in this particular field
6) the value you see next to your address within the 'next' field is your current balance for all your submitted shares since your last payout
-
i just got home, i'll look into the code/miner.
@bobbahope:
good. i'll add PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843s's PTS to PpVDcKeQ8N9n7yszmns3PuSW3t6AbwY843
- xolokram
ps. btw my ptsminer is 13.37 times faster than every laundry machine in terms of "shenanigans per minute"
really??? ypool 141593.60 cp/m right now... I notice there is no total for hashes or shares on your page...?
-
Hi. On a user page, could you add a "current unconfirmed balance" counter?
If you do, thank you.
really??? ypool 141593.60 cp/m right now... I notice there is no total for hashes or shares on your page...?
"spm": "3666.4"
Although, I think a simple "PTS/hour" would be better and clearer.
-
or "PTS/day/miner"
because i dont want to compare "PTS/hour" against the 20k miner pools ;D
i'll add it later today --- uff 2 werk
-
so say i decide to switch pools, but i have a remaining balance mined on this pool, how do i get it paid out?
-
why pay
not?
-
Hi, I reached 1PTS and it then cleared my balance. One would think I had been sent the 1 PTS but I am still waiting for it to arrive. This is my user add http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PuRHB5LLMGsqDvPMuF5S8kZmq9h9748eoF . If it hasn't left your end , could you please add the remaining PTS in my account ( 0.03448 ) to the PTS I am waiting to receive? Thank you kindly!
How can I buy my beer? :'( lol
-
hi,
@Mowcore:
your payout has been executed in the pts transaction 27e4ba4be8337f755a52d9102f8c03b626b41fd2d50b7a071261358b5d3bfcf1, with the blockhash 000012d45baf20cc650efb671478a047fcffabf8c521538454c4e6c9b8516293, with the blockheight 14358
@barwizi+Mowcore:
i want to add a automatic payout for abandoned addresses. that would be what you want, just give me some time. if you need your payouts immediately, let me know...
- xolokram
-
hi,
@Mowcore:
your payout has been executed in the pts transaction 27e4ba4be8337f755a52d9102f8c03b626b41fd2d50b7a071261358b5d3bfcf1, with the blockhash 000012d45baf20cc650efb671478a047fcffabf8c521538454c4e6c9b8516293, with the blockheight 14358
@barwizi+Mowcore:
i want to add a automatic payout for abandoned addresses. that would be what you want, just give me some time. if you need your payouts immediately, let me know...
- xolokram
Thank you mate, some time soon today would be nice :) I haven't had a problem with payouts before from this pool! in your own time ofc. peace.
-
huh what happened, mining really slow, no block found in 2h ...
-
Hi
new ptsminer v0.5 EXPERIMENTAL/BEEEEER EDITION
for ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/)
linux / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: v0.5 x32 -> ptsminer_v05_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/q96ibex3trs2rkk/ptsminer_v05_x32.zip) (32 Bit, experimental, fast!!!) up to 3 threads
windows binary: v0.5 x64 -> ptsminer_v05_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/rdq6bqsy7sg6vo4/ptsminer_v05_x64.zip) (64 Bit, experimental, faster™!!!!)
parameters are different now, check the usage example below
- mining code is now based on jhProtominer (thanks to jh00 & testix) with 512mb setting -> 512mb per thread
- big code cleanup / compilation is now much faster / lightweight binary
- simplified the network code
- you can use cmake to build the binaries if you like
- pool fee decreased to: 2.5%
usage:
ptsminer <your-pts-payout-address> <threads-to-use>
example:
ptsminer PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
notes:
boost library required for compilation!
I can't test on OSX. Maybe someone can say if the compilation works on OSX?
known issues:
occasionally crashs when the connection is lost, put it in a loop to restart-on-fail!
32bit seems to suffer from a higher rejection rate, i'll look into this problem asap
todo:
- payout abandoned addresses
- make the network code bullet-proof
- tweak the mining code
- add support for memory settings
@vortexfoto:
it's all based on randomness and pure luck.
@Mowcore:
i dont know if i'll be able to finish the abandoned-address-payout script feature today. i'll try.
- xolokram
-
/usr/include/boost/thread/thread_time.hpp:19:24: note: ‘boost::get_system_time’
In file included from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:14:0,
from /usr/include/boost/thread/mutex.hpp:16,
from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/thread_data.hpp:12,
from /usr/include/boost/thread/thread.hpp:17,
from /usr/include/boost/thread.hpp:13,
from main_poolminer.hpp:6,
from main_poolminer.cpp:13:
/usr/include/boost/thread/xtime.hpp: At global scope:
/usr/include/boost/thread/xtime.hpp:88:1: error: expected declaration before ‘}’ token
make: *** [obj/main_poolminer.o] Error 1
0.5 not compile with Debian 64
-
Just to compare on an AWS cc2.8xlarge machine with 32 cores I get the following results:
- ypool jhProtominer --> 279 cpm
- beeer ptsminer 0.5 --> 309 cpm
Thats indeed a 10% boost.
-
@hasher:
install the missing parts of the boost library for compilation, it looks like boost::thread is missing
-
Memory requirements the same?
-
it's around 512mb per thread
-
@hasher:
install the missing parts of the boost library for compilation, it looks like boost::thread is missing
xolokram how i can get to know what packeg i need to install?
-
follow this:
http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0
the guide is written for a primecoin miner, but it should work too.
the "Install xolominer dependencies" part is the most important for your situation right now
(you can dismiss some of the packages like libgmp3-dev if you dont want to install all of them)
/edit:
oh, a new page...
new ptsminer v0.5 (http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg5632#msg5632) EXPERIMENTAL/BEEEEER EDITION
-
Could someone please provide some quick instructions on how do you compile the linux client?
Thanks!
-
It's quite faster to build thanks!
As for linux building, feel free to look at my pkgbuild:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/protoshares-thbaumbach-miner-git/
-
hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client
-
hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client
SAME HERE BUT YPOOL client works fine
-
Go beeeeer!! We need moar blocks.
-
I like the client but it keeps crashing. On windows and Linux.
-
hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client
I'm losing maybe 2-3% running 2 threads but when I was running 3 it was in the 10-20% range (on a quad core). I've had the same experience with all the pts miners though.
I have also had a few crashes since .5 whereas I hadn't had any crashes in prior versions. Otherwise it seems to be doing well.
-
it's experimental (especially the current network code). i guess i can fix the issue with other processes by lowering the priority of the threads, i'll look into the code later today.
- xolokram
-
working very well
i5 3570k 105
i7 6core 150
i7 old 4 core 93
:)
-
jh just has process set to start at low priority...lol
-
jh just has process set to start at low priority...lol
why? it is good :)
-
This isn't very fast, I have 20 cores on a VPS mining for PTS and litle profit, in the last hour and half only mined 0.09 in blocks waiting for confirmation, I have 2 VPS with 8 cores each runninh 32 threads between them and a 4 Core VPS with 4 threads.
-
cause you were competing for points with 50thousand hacked machines!!! LOL
-
cause you were competing for points with 50thousand hacked machines!!! LOL
where are they mining now ?
ypool.net is dead
beeer not getting blocks...
-
doesntmatter
do you know what happened with ypool?
-
16657 2013-11-14 12:47:24 465 / 276113 -> 0.05503 PTS / 32.68 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16650 2013-11-14 12:14:11 314 / 117302 -> 0.08747 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16646 2013-11-14 11:57:07 840 / 244829 -> 0.11210 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16640 2013-11-14 11:16:50 280 / 70984 -> 0.12888 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16638 2013-11-14 11:02:47 8 / 5527 -> 0.04729 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16637 2013-11-14 11:01:35 244 / 49073 -> 0.16246 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16635 2013-11-14 10:51:13 1030 / 282509 -> 0.11912 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16607 2013-11-14 09:46:15 138 / 90245 -> 0.04996 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16584 2013-11-14 09:24:02 66 / 38269 -> 0.05635 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16575 2013-11-14 09:14:30 165 / 107938 -> 0.04995 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16548 2013-11-14 08:46:26 1 / 353 -> 0.09256 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16547 2013-11-14 08:46:16 204 / 108029 -> 0.06170 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
What is this? Not getting any blocks or what? :P
-
@andhar
Difficulty rose from 0.00012097 to 0.00051405 somewhere in between blocks 16116 and 16143, so about 12 hours ago. I think this might explain the delay in confirmations as it takes 120 blocks to confirm, and if this increase got it to the intended block interval of 5 minutes that would mean it now takes 10 hours to confirm.
note; I'm just guessing.
Edit; I just checked my user page and it appears all blocks older than about 5 hours have been confirmed, this might mean another increase in difficulty in a week.
-
Blocktime is around 3-4 mins now so yes, pretty close.
-
[WORKER] collision found: 20773412 <-> 22822495 @ 23190
[WORKER] collision found: 25365686 <-> 5640266 @ 23194
[WORKER] collision found: 60337804 <-> 19167742 @ 23216
[WORKER] collision found: 4597836 <-> 8051286 @ 23230
[WORKER] collision found: 43018870 <-> 65089630 @ 23232
[WORKER] collision found: 768710 <-> 1878813 @ 23240
[WORKER] collision found: 40513346 <-> 52385916 @ 23258
[WORKER] collision found: 58369753 <-> 21479927 @ 23266
so another pool is dead ?
where to mine now ?
-
Something just happened here. 19 PTS just came rambling into my wallet :P
-
BUG REPORT:
Tried v0.5 64 Bit binary http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/ but it crashes after 1-2 hours of mining.
Previous version " v0.4 64 Bit binary (fast!!)" was running on same machines for days without an issue.
-
pool ip down again
collisions came like crazy :(
-
pool is up, but workload has increased since v0.5 ;)
i'll apply a patch to the server in a few minutes, expect a small downtime (instable v0.5 might crash...)
ok something's broken :(
-
after update i got only rejects now :(
[WORKER] collision found: 10387726 <-> 1009634 @ 374
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Nov-14 15:32:26 | 104.4 c/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 28 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 39325085 <-> 29839065 @ 392
[WORKER] collision found: 38662682 <-> 35665282 @ 394
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Nov-14 15:32:33 | 106.5 c/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 29 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Nov-14 15:32:33 | 106.5 c/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 30 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 43372859 <-> 39383985 @ 396
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Nov-14 15:32:34 | 106.5 c/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 31 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
same here. on 7 instances :P
-
pool is up, but workload has increased since v0.5 ;)
i'll apply a patch to the server in a few minutes, expect a small downtime (instable v0.5 might crash...)
ok something's broken :(
At least your honest and open about it...well done! Better than creeping around in the shadows! ;-)
-
wait a sec
/edit1:
goddamn guys, you're too fast, give me some time ;)
/edit2:
ok, i reverted the pool "fix", i have to look into this later today
there's other stuff to do right now, i'll back later
sorry for the inconvenience
-
Which one is better to mine in this pool? the windows x64 or linux?
-
xolokram i cant find staistics
http://pts.syware.de/?a=Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i mined several hours and score is empty?
-
been quiet here also for some hours it seems. Atleast it's not updating.
-
xolokram i cant find staistics
http://pts.syware.de/?a=Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i mined several hours and score is empty?
Same here, not even on http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvtCgH8rgKj6kFFPNZeDMsZ21aDUe33YRD ... strange
-
Yup same here.
-
xolokram i cant find staistics
http://pts.syware.de/?a=Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i mined several hours and score is empty?
Same here, not even on http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PvtCgH8rgKj6kFFPNZeDMsZ21aDUe33YRD ... strange
FYI, just saw an update for both our addresses
-
did not get payments for a long time(
-
Hi,
this is the official announcement for my protoshares mining sub-pool BETA ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org)
i'm the guy who runs beeeeer.org (obviously)
v0.5
usage:
ptsminer <your-pts-payout-address> <threads-to-use>
example:
ptsminer PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
HI,
Could you please readd the -url and -port option for version 0.5 ? I need it to go thru a proxy first and I insert the address there...
regards,
P.
-
Xolo do you think it would be possible to make a low memory version? 200-256mb per thread?
-
Total blocks found 666 )))
-
I am seeing these messages on the v5 linux client:
[WORKER] collision found: 5391609 <-> 56993899 @ 74
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
Does that mean a share was found and submitted or is an error?
-
it means that share was found and send
when you see only collisions that means your network is down or pool is down
-
@BartV&GurungBoi&andhar:
stats on the web frontend are cached, and the caching algorithm is pretty simple (read: stupid) thus the user stats are not up-to-date all the time. i hope your personal stats are alright again?!
@Vzierx:
i just checked your account on beeeeer.org, but then i realised there are no real accounts on beeeeer.org, just payout addresses! mh, what should i do now? i guess you already read the first post of this thread, especially the part about the payout barrier?
@hiddenvalleyranch:
it's already planned.
@voffka05:
;D
@Snard:
this is a share that has been submitted and confirmed
@raynaldo:
i hope someone with enough computing power / test environments can help. which is better: windows or linux version of ptsminer?
@PMB:
hmpf, i'll put it on the todo list.....
@v0.5:
i found out that the mining is not so efficient on very high end hardware - using 32-64 threads, i'll try to improve this asap.
- xolokram
ps. so much to do...
pps. why are some people saying something about DDoS? [STATS] 2013-Nov-14 17:54:17 | 108.8 c/m | VL: 980 (99.7%), RJ: 3 (0.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
Is there a tutorial on getting digi ocean droplets up and running on beeeer, I have a few that were mining ypool but that pool wont be up for atleast a day.
-
Hey xolokram
this block seems odd
16702 2013-11-14 15:52:33 1750 / 623966 -> 0.09164 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
so much shares just for 0.09? :O
-
yeah i looked it up after hahah
Thanks eitherways
-
yeah i looked it up after hahah
Thanks eitherways
That new diff is a real mofo. I'm thinking my mining days are coming to an end then it'll be sit and wait time.
Yep. It's all over. Better stop mining now - stop wasting your electricity and making it more difficult for the rest of us. ;)
-
Hey guys,
Anyone ever figure out why v0.5 keeps crashing every few ours on Windows? 64 bit.
-
Just crashed here also :)
-
I think its has to do when network connection is lost or pool is restarted... and yes its kinda pain, i got to keep monitoring my 10 machines to see if they are working or not every few hours =\
Hope that gets sorted out soon
-
Yeah its a little bothersome that I cant just walk away from them for hours haha.
I'm sure xolo is hard at work on a fix :)
-
I think its has to do when network connection is lost or pool is restarted... and yes its kinda pain, i got to keep monitoring my 10 machines to see if they are working or not every few hours =\
Hope that gets sorted out soon
Yeah and the part that is frustrating is that it does not just crash the script, it puts up a fricken dialog box in Windows saying the app crashed that you have to click. Makes it hard to restart the process automatically. At this point I'm thinking about splitting the threads between two pools. It sucks PTS has not evolved enough to have backup pools in a common client yet. ::)
-
pool has been restarted
(and it will be restarted again later due to testing/patch deployment)
-
pool has been restarted
How do you make it not pop up the dialog box saying it crashed?
-
How do i run the miner in a loop? 64 bit. windows.
-
Is the speed difference between v04 and v05 great? I'm thinking of leaving the v04 mining through the nigh on my 20 VPS cores, so it won't crash after a couple of hours
-
Create the following 32bit DWORD and set it to 1:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\ Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\DontShowUI
That will stop the dialog and allow your loop'd batch file to work.
Brilliant, thank you sir!
-
Create the following 32bit DWORD and set it to 1:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\ Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\DontShowUI
That will stop the dialog and allow your loop'd batch file to work.
Noob question, how do we do that?
-
Easiest way to do it. Create a file with notepad:
---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting]
"DontShowUI"=dword:00000001
---
Save as anything.reg (make sure you change the default save from .txt) and then double click on it.
-
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting]
"DontShowUI"=dword:00000001
Thanks, already uploaded the file to my VPSs, the file should have only the part I quoted, right?
-
Had to run v4 v5 keeps crashing, im getting alot of rejected shares on my miners.
-
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting]
"DontShowUI"=dword:00000001
Thanks, already uploaded the file to my VPSs, the file should have only the part I quoted, right?
Correct. Again, the only tricky part is making sure it's saved as a filename.reg not a filename.reg.txt.
-
to get better performance with version 5 client run multiple instances
for example with a dual Xeon E5-2690 I get about 380 Col/min with 32 threads
but running two instances of ptsminer_64bits with 16 threads each yields 220 col/min
I also set the affinity of each process ( using procexp) so each instance runs from a single cpu, seems to add about 10+/- col/min
so 440 col/min vs 380
-
Thanks for the fix guys, hope it works. And do you think it would be worth running multiple instances with 8 cores?
-
Im running double instances on my AMD fx 8350.
Getting around 150c/m on instance one and 99.4c/m on the other one :P
It's not clocked :P
-
Looks like the hotfix just checked into github isn't compiling:
[root@ip-10-99-131-147 ptsminer]# git log
commit c51b1025ecd824e1e52f73b74b88d65f67f0affa
Author: Thomas Baumbach <xolokram@tofumuffin.net>
Date: Thu Nov 14 20:12:05 2013 +0100
v0.5 HOTFIX-1
- worked on the network code
- added shares/min output
- added sharetarget output
[root@ip-10-99-131-147 ptsminer]# make -f makefile.unix
make: makefile.unix: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `makefile.unix'. Stop.
[root@ip-10-99-131-147 ptsminer]# cd src
[root@ip-10-99-131-147 src]# make -f makefile.unix
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ec
2-user/ptsminer/src -I/home/ec2-user/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fsta
ck-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main_poolmi
ner.d -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
main_poolminer.cpp:495:1: fatal error: opening dependency file obj/main_poolmine
r.d: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
-
sh-- :) create a directory named "obj" in the src-directory :)
fix incoming
-
it does work when using the cmake up a directory
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer
cmake .
make
-
is the pool down?
-
yeah pool restart incoming
wait a sec
hotfix for v0.5 incoming
wait two sec
-
looks to be working now
-
Looks good now, but i am still receiving about 30% rejected shares.
Many thanks anyway :-)
-
Hi
new ptsminer v0.5 EXPERIMENTAL/BEEEEER EDITION HOTFIX-1
for ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org)
linux / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: v0.5 x32 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/10szy43zzf99xh8/ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip) (32 Bit, experimental, faster™!!!!) up to 3 threads
windows binary: v0.5 x64 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/w1aukecc052a52p/ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip) (64 Bit, experimental, faster™!!!!)
parameters are different now, check the usage example below
- mining code is now based on jhProtominer (thanks to jh00 & testix) with 512mb setting -> 512mb per thread
- network code fix, preventing crashs <-- new
- shares/min & share target shown <-- new
- big code cleanup / compilation is now much faster / lightweight binary
- simplified the network code
- you can use cmake to build the binaries if you like
- pool fee decreased to: 2.5% !!!
usage:
ptsminer <your-pts-payout-address> <threads-to-use>
example:
ptsminer PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
notes:
boost library required for compilation!
problems with compilation? adapt some of the things from --> HERE (http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0) (thanks to donschoe, don't forget to DONATE!!)
I can't test on OSX. Maybe someone can say if the compilation works on OSX?
known issues:
miners with >24 threads should consider to use two instances with less threads instead of one instance for all threads
a high thread count seems to cause rejections, i'll look into this issue asap
todo:
- abandoned addresses payout script
- tweak the mining code
- add support for memory settings
- check rej rate for miners with >24 threads
- xolokram
-
[STATS] 2013-Nov-14 15:06:48 | 31.1 c/m | VL: 199 (99.0%), RJ: 2 (1.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
0 porblems on my linux miner
-
Is this a new verson 5 or is it the same on i have been using all day?
-
Thank you xolo!!
I was lucky and found your commit before you posted it here. I have found that i have much less rejected shares if i use more threads. When i use 32threads - get about 30% rejected shares and for 64threads i get only about 8% rejected shares. I'll try even more threads.
-
i'll work on a patch for the server next
i think i'll have to increase the share target to reduce the workload for the server (aka increase the stability)
this will decrease your shares/min (just fyi), but col/min will stay the same
@gabaic:
please dont quote the whole post, it polutes the thread somehow (can you edit this?)
it's a new version with a fix for the network code, preventing crashs if the connection is lost
@LordHelma/Riverhead:
nice to hear
@support/help/compilation issues:
speaking about poluting the thread: this is not a chat!
i think we have to create a seperate "tech support" thread
- xolokram
/edit:
oh, a new page...
new ptsminer v0.5 (http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg6297#msg6297) EXPERIMENTAL/BEEEEER EDITION <-- HOTFIX-1
-
i have tried to use the linux version of your miner, with this instructions:
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
cp makefile.unix makefile
make
./ptsminer PvELCuq4aq1XWqtWRcPp4LfTFE9DfXXo2m 4
But iam getting this error after "make":
ubuntu@ip-***:~/beer/ptsminer/src$ make
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main_poolminer.d -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
In file included from main_poolminer.cpp:13:0:
main_poolminer.hpp:6:28: fatal error: boost/thread.hpp: No such file or directory
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
Somebody can help ? its ubuntu and i have installed the g++ build essential
-
i have tried to use the linux version of your miner, with this instructions:
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
cp makefile.unix makefile
make
./ptsminer PvELCuq4aq1XWqtWRcPp4LfTFE9DfXXo2m 4
But iam getting this error after "make":
ubuntu@ip-***:~/beer/ptsminer/src$ make
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main_poolminer.d -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
In file included from main_poolminer.cpp:13:0:
main_poolminer.hpp:6:28: fatal error: boost/thread.hpp: No such file or directory
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
Somebody can help ? its ubuntu and i have installed the g++ build essential
apt-get install libboost-all-dev
-
thanks for your short reply now after installed libboost i become this error:
ubuntu@ip-172-31-21-255:~/beer/ptsminer/src$ make
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/main_poolminer.d -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/sha2.d -o obj/sha2.o sha2.cpp
g++ -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src -I/home/ubuntu/beer/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -o ptsminer obj/main_poolminer.o obj/sha2.o -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -l boost_chrono -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
:-[
-
First thanks for the miner!
Second :P there is a bug that not show the correct "sharetarget"
"[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff"
-
@metac0m:
please dont quote the whole post (edit your post)
the share target is correct!! that's how it looks like
upcoming share target will be: 00ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
(share target, not network difficulty/target!!)
@ikswobel:
install zlib
sudo apt-get install zlib-develi think
- xolokram
-
To Xolo:
why all block from
16575 2013-11-14 09:14:30 109 / 107938 -> 0.03300 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
not added?(I meant :not confirmet yet )
And you forgot change the priority of procces ptsminer_64bit to low !!!I need to set priority manual in task Manager.
-
new ptsminer v0.5 EXPERIMENTAL/BEEEEER EDITION HOTFIX-1
linux / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: v0.5 x32 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/10szy43zzf99xh8/ptsminer_v05a_x32.zip) (32 Bit, experimental, faster™!!!!) up to 3 threads
windows binary: v0.5 x64 HOTFIX-1 -> ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/w1aukecc052a52p/ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip) (64 Bit, experimental, faster™!!!!)
I can't test on OSX. Maybe someone can say if the compilation works on OSX?
known issues:
miners with >24 threads should consider to use two instances with less threads instead of one instance for all threads
a high thread count seems to cause rejections, i'll look into this issue asap
- xolokram
works on OSX
-
Is the -m512 set automatically?
-
@HCarvalho:
yep, it's default, you can't change it right now! read the post
it's on the todo list
@spoonman:
thank you!
(can you please remove some of the lines from my post in your quote, it's messy with these big quotes)
- xolokram
-
I can't connecto to the pool !!!
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.5 RC1 <experimental> HOTFIX-1
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
*** thanks to jh00, testix & Co.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
spawning 8 worker thread(s)
[WORKER1] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER[WORKER3] Hello, World!
2] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER5] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER2] GoGoGo!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
^[[A^[[A^[[Aconnecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
And it continues, but if i do a telnet to the server and the port is open. Any ideas ? I'm running on Debian 7 amd64 lasted version
-
what command/payout address do you use for connecting (PM me if you dont want to write it here in the thread)
-
Hi guys..
Quick few questions and wondering if anyone can answer this:
PPS rate?
Fee? 2.5% - Is this still correct?
Is it really 501% faster? Compared to ypool?
I cant work out HPM so how do I know its faster?
Ta very much..
-
It seems like its incredibly slow to process confirmations, I started mining in the pool 7hrs ago and Im still 100 blocks away from even getting to the ones Ive earned a part of and it doesn't seem to be moving.
-
This is the address i'm using PfzMPmZ44fWndr4rMP76vABXKJde8atxpz
-
Just be patient and mine away, we are getting a decent number of blocks now that ypool is down haha. I don't think you should be too worried about long wait times to get paid, unless you are selling as soon as you get them....
-
getting alot more rejects since the hotfix... but i'mnot complaining
-
Just be patient and mine away, we are getting a decent number of blocks now that ypool is down haha. I don't think you should be too worried about long wait times to get paid, unless you are selling as soon as you get them....
I am selling them as soon as I earn them though. dont have much faith in bts
-
I cant work out hps.. It tells me but its incredibly low. That's doesn't look right (4.xx hps on a machine that does 35hps)? What am I missing?
-
damn pool is down again
-
Always comes back up in a few minutes, I havent had to manually restart any of my miners yet.
Thanks for the hotfix Xolo!
-
server workload is
quite VERY high currently, i'm working on a fix, keep calm
@NineLives:
there are not hps/hpm in v0.5 (which i recommend)
and no pps (*fixed*)
srsly, please read at least the first post in this thread...
-
server workload is quite high currently, i'm working on a fix, keep calm
@NineLives:
there are not hps/hpm in v0.5 (which i recommend)
and no pts
srsly, please read at least the first post in this thread...
I understand dude but then how are we comparing. You will have to excuse my knowledge but PPS info and how do I measure with other pools to commit all my current 259hpm with you? What have I got to measure with.
I'm sorry my questions may sound annoying but I need to know.
Thanks allot.
-
pool is dead
-
I mined for a few hours at around 130 collisions yet my balance says 0 on the website. Why?
-
Yeah I think the pool is down, I hope it doesn't last long there are like no pools left.
-
is there an official IRC channel for this mining pool?
-
Back up, everyone can chill now 8)
-
Pays out after 1 buddy
-
Came back for like a moment and went byebye again
-
will stop it now until i fix it
this thread is so painful to read
/edit:
i forgot to mention
blocks & payouts are save - don't panic
-
Aren't they all? A few minutes of downtime and it erupts haha.
-
#beeeeer.org on freenode :o
back again
-
On OS X (10.9 & 10.8.5) if it fails to connect, instead of trying to reconnect it throws up this error and terminates the process:
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
libc++abi.dylib: terminating with uncaught exception of type boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >: set_option: Invalid argument
Abort trap: 6
[Process Finished]
Any idea what could be causing that?
-
did you adjust the share speed .. looks like its going slower
-
yep, sharetarget has been adjusted to reduce the workload for the server
sh/min should decrease while col/min should stay the same
- xolokram
-
2 huge botnets are getting 20 pts from the block
the crumbs are for community
i wonder when those fat guys will dump all their pts to pay for cloud/botnet
this is silly
-
2 huge botnets are getting 20 pts from the block
the crumbs are for community
i wonder when those fat guys will dump all their pts to pay for cloud/botnet
this is silly
Yeah, I have an odd feeling we are moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic.
-
unfortunately you're right, proportional payout is not the best with this distribution of miners
i'll look into this 'problem' tomorrow
atm i'm just glad it's working again (although the count of miners is still rising......)
we'll see what the night brings *fingers crossed*
- xolokram
ps. that means: good night
pps. todo for miner: recognize disconnect earlier
-
My /user/ still says I have 0....
-
Thanks for this pool!
-
hI
-
#beeeeer.org on freenode :o
back again
HI,xolokram.
pls help me ,v0.5a how to set proxy mining?
thanks!
-
Is beer down again?
-
:o
Nooooooooo
Beeeeeerrrrrrr....
-
damn down again.. as soon as ypool comes up beeer goes down hummm
-
[STATS] 2013-Nov-15 14:28:27 | 52.6 c/m | 0.4 sh/m | VL: 2 (66.7%), RJ: 1 (33.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
anyone know how long the confirms take? how many blocks?
6 hours and still waiting on confirms
-
@gabainc:
do me a favor and go back to ypool, they'll need you more than i do, kthxbye.
@down/rejects:
server workload was very high with 30k+ miners
told you (or at least i told the guys in the irc, but they demanded a higher sharetarget) :)
i decreased the sharetarget to reduce the workload!
@prophetx:
120 x <blocktime>
blocktime should be 5 minutes
but it's way less currently, check the irc channel, they will help you with up-to-date information, lots of clever people there (&trolls)
- xolokram
ps. <off-to-work-mode-activated>
pps. Pt6eLRkYWgvhzVvSgvbFcMAvjJGqxXf is a broken address, the owner should fix this!!
-
Beeeeerpool is the only pool still standing, all hail beeeeerpool!
(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/1976110/beavis-n-butthead-rockin-out-o.gif)
-
anyone know how long the confirms take? how many blocks?
6 hours and still waiting on confirms
I think the admin process this manually.
-
not only does beer rock the share target says beefde4d!!! AWSOME
-
I'm using the new version and yet I get around 25% rejections. Is there any bug?
-
I'm using the new version and yet I get around 25% rejections. Is there any bug?
Me too, 0.5a Rejection rate skyrocketed to 40%.
-
server is going through some hard times currently
i'm checking what's the bottleneck right now
/edit: something's broken
payouts are currently paused, i'm fixing it
they will be back and running in a few (<6) hours
i'm sorry for the inconvencience
-
Rejection rate turned back to normal after your bottleneck post, thanks.
I found the new miner very resource intensive for my low-end G620 cpu, i guess this is intended for higher collision rate.
-
xolokram
are u still limiting the shares/min?
-
Again 40% rejection rate, and even more, payout is frozen.
-
i think i've found out why there are so many rejections on high amounts of threads, it's actually just stupid to send the work as share in the first place --- so the rejection is correct, but sending it to the server is unnecessary.
@GurungBoi:
i'm not limiting them, i just use a different share target, which reduces the shares/min
@wirel1:
i fixed a memory leak, i think this was causing some of the trouble we had last night.
net miner is still using normal priority & 512 mb per thread, if you want to change the priority, you'll have to do it manually.
@all:
speaking of problems, here's what i found out about the payout system:
before going berserk: read the following, try to understand it, read it again (!), and if you have something useful to say write it here (or PM me)
ok, so the server workload was really heavy the last hours, which broke the execution of the payout script, while the normal behavior would be
every X seconds do {
check last payout & the following block (confirmed? orphan? etc. pp)
calculate the payout & next value for all users
send payout info to protoshares backend & execute payout
save all information
}
due to the workload and connection problems last night the communication to the backend had some huge delays, which led to parallel executions of the payout script on the same block
long story short: payouts on some blocks had been executed multiple times
ok, that's bad. bad it's not very bad. why?
because the users that had the most advantage (high values in the payouts) kept mining at the pool, which means i can use the unconfirmed balance of these users to correct their balance.
so what's the problem?
slow miners in the broken payouts don't have enough mined yet (in the unconfirmed block), so they are able to run away with the bounty. let's see what the unconfirmed blocks will bring and i'll try to correct the remaining parts with the fees I've earned, because it was my mistake ... somehow
so why do you tell all this?
because honesty is important! i could have just said nothing (since no of the affected miners didn't noticed something strangely..........). but without honesty i could just go on and introduce "dynamic fees" or have a "hardware failure", or use "software" without ............... <-- ok, sorry, enough, nvm :)
ok, so give of some numbers?
yes, here we go:
the blocks that have been executed multiple times:
16547: 17x >:(
16794: 3x
16805: 2x
16806: 2x
16859: 2x
16878: 2x
16891: 2x
16903: 18x >:(
17035: 2x
17133: 10x >:(
I've added the difference (negative balance) for the miners who had multiple payouts to the following payout:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/17136
check the "diff" field
yes, some numbers there are quite high, but those miners are big miners with many mining machines, this means all unconfirmed blocks can pay for the negative balance and we'll not have a problem with these high values. it's the smaller values that are causing me some a headache.
i used all of my free time today to check/fix that sh--
although there's enough to do on the pool & miner side.
- xolokram
ps. the "leftover" value in the payouts is broken due to this bug, i'll fix that later manually
-
i mined today few coins and i have -15PTS balance...
something is wrong
-
i mined today few coins and i have -15PTS balance...
something is wrong
Read the post above yours.
-
Hi,
just reminder about my broken address Pt6eLRkYWgvhzVvSgvbFcMAvjJGqxXf which is mentioned few posts back.
I have reconfigured my miners and its ok now.
Right one is Pt6eLRkYWgvhzVvSgvbFcMAvjJGqxXfWW6.
Please send me please rest PTSs from that broken one to my proper address.
Thank you!! :-)
-
a personal message (PM) would've been enough, but i guess this is ok too :)
-
Hello,
I'm using the ptsminer v0.5 x64 HOTFIX-1
and seeing a lot of "collision found"
What's this ?
[STATS] 2013-Nov-15 21:52:20 | 106.5 c/m | 0.7 sh/m | VL: 14 (70.0%), RJ: 6 (30.
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 54746056 <-> 54381290 @ 2994
[WORKER] collision found: 17780443 <-> 1935263 @ 3002
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 01ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 3026800 <-> 59240635 @ 3060
[WORKER] collision found: 40120972 <-> 30257251 @ 3094
[WORKER] collision found: 42257301 <-> 25560787 @ 3136
[WORKER] collision found: 60539765 <-> 40498788 @ 3550
[WORKER] collision found: 63049556 <-> 63545307 @ 3552
[WORKER] collision found: 32449677 <-> 25850027 @ 3682
[WORKER] collision found: 15886462 <-> 23294048 @ 4042
[WORKER] collision found: 8127338 <-> 11517158 @ 4072
[WORKER] collision found: 37008705 <-> 59704228 @ 4104
[WORKER] collision found: 63871259 <-> 64974964 @ 4124
[WORKER] collision found: 62698528 <-> 61153351 @ 4246
[WORKER] collision found: 61281213 <-> 20853500 @ 4318
[WORKER] collision found: 33259673 <-> 25378031 @ 4376
[WORKER] collision found: 54187517 <-> 4818290 @ 4506
[WORKER] collision found: 26778782 <-> 59158766 @ 4696
[WORKER] collision found: 14554189 <-> 42852357 @ 4828
[WORKER] collision found: 20952807 <-> 5770966 @ 4916
[WORKER] collision found: 13366988 <-> 22376522 @ 4946
[WORKER] collision found: 63672439 <-> 52606995 @ 5058
[WORKER] collision found: 18128314 <-> 8092947 @ 5456
[WORKER] collision found: 23996202 <-> 17247617 @ 5836
-
and now (5 minutes later) I see this...
This page (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/) is currently offline. However, because the site uses CloudFlare's Always Online™ technology you can continue to surf a snapshot of the site. We will keep checking in the background and, as soon as the site comes back, you will automatically be served the live version. Always Online™ is powered by CloudFlare | Hide this Alert
Server down?
-
When you get a collision it does some work to check if it's a valid collision and then sends the data to the server as a potential share.
Unfortunately if the server goes down and you're working on a block it will keep working, keep finding collisions and then not send them anywhere.
So all in all what you've just seen there is lost potential shares in the pool block(s)
-
The main site appears up but the user page is giving me the CloudFlare message.
-
hi xolokram, can I modify your ptsminer code to use more than 512 MB memory ? Is it faster ? Thanks
a personal message (PM) would've been enough, but i guess this is ok too :)
-
hi xolokram, can I modify your ptsminer code to use more than 512 MB memory ? Is it faster ? Thanks
a personal message (PM) would've been enough, but i guess this is ok too :)
Can you tell the rest off us how to if its ok. I could allocate up to 1.5gb to each of my 8 threads... if that would make a 50% difference say, I would gladly do so. Or at least, may you please release a 1024 mb/thread option.
-
Whats up with the stats pages?
Are shares really being accepted, or is time to switch?
I want to stick with the beeeermeister, but without any stats its freakin me out :o
-
Well.. I'm still getting payouts and my miners are still mining soo... I'd say the pool is up and runs independently from the stats page.
Come on friends. brains
-
Yeah, I am still getting pay-outs even with the stats page being down. Not worried here.
-
Yes, me too. Seems all normal as far as I can say.
-
still down :(
-
I'm not seeing payouts into my wallet, and I can't access the user stats page. I'm not worried, just want to make sure all will work out when everything is fixed.
-
I got a payout a few hours ago. All seems well from a mining perspective.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
-
Really? I started mining last night, and have had no payouts. I checked the root access and it looks fine. I wonder if I did something wrong...
-
Really? I started mining last night, and have had no payouts. I checked the root access and it looks fine. I wonder if I did something wrong...
It only pays out when the balance is greater than 1 PTS. What's your c/m? This was my last payment:
TRUE 2013-11-16T06:59:10 Received with ptsminer Povrejv79HQ4Fw2h2JapyyybbniUQZAhce 1.00384167 2fa6ca28ac4b3989214be216efd27442b48f34ca475b0406e713e0eeb94fb93e-000
-
Personally i hover somewhere around 150c/m, how long would i expect to wait for my first PTS?
Weeks, months?
No worries, i just got my first payout of 1.000xx something PTS. Have added a few more machines i've got laying around and should soon reach 400c/m...
If only my Dual-CPU Quad-core 3GHz Xeon server didn't sound like a jet plane I'd add that as well...
-
the problem is that there's no accurate way to detect the efficacy of changes to your hashrate unless you wait for several payouts - and even then, you only get a snapshot of your changes from back then.
if you're more than a few percentage points of the pool, this goes faster and is more accurate short term, but there aren't many in that boat.
Lack of stats doesn't do well for trust of the pool operator :\ I would really prefer if he could fix the stats page ASAP
-
he cleary says its beta pool
also
We are not responsible for any damage to your computer system or data with our provided
service and software and in no event will we be responsible for any consequential, incidental,
or indirect damages arising out of the use or inability to use our service or software.
Botnets are not welcome. Addresses may be suspended without prior notice!
even if he fails big time its your fault. you can go elsewhere...
-
Does anyone else get a really high (15%+) reject rate on this pool?
I'm using the linux miner on ubuntu.
-
Yeah my reject rate has gotten much higher. It's gone from about 1% two days ago to 9% now.
-
I'm getting over 15% on every machine, up to 20% on some machines. think i'm gonna bail on this pool.
-
yay just got my first PTS :)
-
Stat pages are back online.
-
I'm getting over 15% on every machine, up to 20% on some machines. think i'm gonna bail on this pool.
With ypool unavailable, where are you going to go?
-
I'm getting over 15% on every machine, up to 20% on some machines. think i'm gonna bail on this pool.
With ypool unavailable, where are you going to go?
Coyote miner is another good alternative. http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=636.0 (http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=636.0)
edit: i am using both beeeeer and coyote miner and they both have been extremely stable compared to ypool.
-
@pool web frontend down:
sorry, my bad! :o
srsly, it was pure stupidity
@bad server performance / rej rate / submission delay:
i'll have to switch to a different server, the current one is not good enough (especially not for 10k, 20k or even 30k miners)
this shouldn't bother you too much, you'll likely not notice anything, except that it'll decrease the rejection rate... hopefully!!
i wasnt really able to do anything for the pool today (thus the long downtime of the web front end), and now it's really late here <-- this is my bad excuse for:
but i should be able to switch the server machine by tomorrow evening
@Riverhead:
thanks for helping
@automake:
yes, please, modify/advance/improve my miner.
(as long as you pay the beeeeer software developer gold subsciption fee (just kidding))
- xolokram
ps. sharetarget changed to 03ffff...
-
Alternative statistics - http://54.219.131.208/pts/<your pool pts address> :)
- daily total
- hourly production
Note - this parses the ptsweb server's output - so if ptsweb is down, this is also down. This is also the cause of the latency.
Example:
(http://i.imgur.com/YFc8K6Ol.png) (http://imgur.com/YFc8K6O)
http://54.219.131.208/pts/PangZLLrnCfKRadGm1Xxy55AncqJxDr7sj
-
hehe i was thinking something like that too. i would add a total of waiting shares and a PTS per day...
-
Alternative statistics - http://54.219.131.208/pts/<your pool pts address> :)
- daily total
- hourly production
ooh, purty :D
/tried to donate but the PYY address won't validate in the ProtoShares 0.8.5 wallet
-
Could you decrease the payhold threshold back to .5 now that the price is averaging around 10 dollars per coin?
-
i agree, especialy with the dificutly rising tomorow, it would be awesome to have 0.5 payout treshold
-
im losing PTSs by this point of mining, because of increasing number of miners in pool, could you please make pyout as soon as possible?
-
/tried to donate but the PYY address won't validate in the ProtoShares 0.8.5 wallet
WTF
Are you using client from before the hard fork?
Also, all clients versions are the same (yeah...).
If so, better change it, I think you can possibly lose your coins or at least have big problems with transactions
-
/tried to donate but the PYY address won't validate in the ProtoShares 0.8.5 wallet
WTF
Are you using client from before the hard fork?
Also, all clients versions are the same (yeah...).
If so, better change it, I think you can possibly lose your coins or at least have big problems with transactions
Nope - and the address you changed it to (PeFP) validates fine. Thanks!
-
Thank you. What a weird bug in client.
-
Holy crap, "difficulty" : 0.00221064,
20min between blocks now, thats painfull...
-
Guys, you should really make use of the Amazon cloud (AWS) !!
Use the c3.4xlarge instances for low rejection rates (c3.8xlarge: 25% rejection, c3.4xlarge: 5-8% rejection) bundled with Ubuntu 13.10.
To access the instances use, e.g., WinSCP and Putty.
Upload the soucre code of the 0.5a miner, and execute the following commands, done.
sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev libboost-all-dev unzip mc
unzip ptspool-master.zip
cd ptspool-master/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW 16
(Of course, I'd like to see my wallet adress here. lol)
Oh, btw, use the Amazon (autcion based) spot instances which you get at approx. 0.5USD right now (see AWS-Irland, and AWS-Singapore for example).
Happy mining.
If you like this solution, please consider a donation: PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW
brainbug
-
Holy crap, "difficulty" : 0.00221064,
20min between blocks now, thats painfull...
It only went up by 4.3 times. I was expecting more, given that it's supposed to be 5 minute blocks.
-
lol, no useful information in hasher's post
roflmao ;D
-
lol, no useful information in hasher's post
roflmao ;D
sorry i mistakenly mixed your pool with coyote pool, your pool seems ok,
even much better then ypool where trojan spotted ..
-
Can you fix it so that the urls like:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/<address>
respond to the "Accept: application/json" header with a JSON doc?
Thanks :)
Alex
-
xolokram i think ill never fill this balances up from now with such difficulty, can you gather 3 addresses balances and payout me, please?
Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK -0.59
PeatnmEeFwwHPU6tPsyUJhqqMdSMgno5qx -0.7704
PhLURX7SMvQsxmPNre8ihkQowGsGa6FMgb -0.24
-
@Xolokram, could you please add amount of unconfirmed PTS to the stats page?
Thanks!
-
Since the diff rise this pool has become useless, mined it with 100 vps cores for 60 minutes, only 2 blocks found.
-
Since the diff rise this pool has become useless, mined it with 100 vps cores for 60 minutes, only 2 blocks found.
Are other pools more useful?
Mining with 240 cores at beeeeer currently.
-
Yes, at least i can get a steady return on ypool, nothing like yesterday, but more than the 0.1 pts i've mined while on beeeer
-
difficulty is really painful now
with the new diff i'm going to slowly reduce the payout threshold towards 0.5
0.9 next, then 0.8 later and so on
@HCarvalho:
thanks for the helpful words. you know there's a payout barrier & randomnes involved?
- xolokram
-
can you please reduce the payout to 0.20 or less?
With current difficulties we can't reach 1.0 or 0.5 so easily.
-
difficulty is really painful now
with the new diff i'm going to slowly reduce the payout threshold towards 0.5
0.9 next, then 0.8 later and so on
@HCarvalho:
thanks for the helpful words. you know there's a payout barrier & randomnes involved?
- xolokram
The best way is create button "withdraw", but first of all you need to make more faster miner (with AVX)
-
Guys, you should really make use of the Amazon cloud (AWS) !!
Use the c3.4xlarge instances for low rejection rates (c3.8xlarge: 25% rejection, c3.4xlarge: 5-8% rejection) bundled with Ubuntu 13.10.
To access the instances use, e.g., WinSCP and Putty.
Upload the soucre code of the 0.5a miner, and execute the following commands, done.
sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev libboost-all-dev unzip mc
unzip ptspool-master.zip
cd ptspool-master/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW 16
(Of course, I'd like to see my wallet adress here. lol)
Oh, btw, use the Amazon (autcion based) spot instances which you get at approx. 0.5USD right now (see AWS-Irland, and AWS-Singapore for example).
Happy mining.
If you like this solution, please consider a donation: PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW
brainbug
it says that you get 750 hours free every month:
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
so does that mean you basically get 1 free instance for a year? after that, the price is $1.2/hr, which is insane
-
Guys, you should really make use of the Amazon cloud (AWS) !!
Use the c3.4xlarge instances for low rejection rates (c3.8xlarge: 25% rejection, c3.4xlarge: 5-8% rejection) bundled with Ubuntu 13.10.
To access the instances use, e.g., WinSCP and Putty.
Upload the soucre code of the 0.5a miner, and execute the following commands, done.
sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev libboost-all-dev unzip mc
unzip ptspool-master.zip
cd ptspool-master/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW 16
(Of course, I'd like to see my wallet adress here. lol)
Oh, btw, use the Amazon (autcion based) spot instances which you get at approx. 0.5USD right now (see AWS-Irland, and AWS-Singapore for example).
Happy mining.
If you like this solution, please consider a donation: PaPbuU9pVGm6rGnMDe8a8MzWAxymf3RXUW
brainbug
it says that you get 750 hours free every month:
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
so does that mean you basically get 1 free instance for a year? after that, the price is $1.2/hr, which is insane
It's not profitable at this point to do the AWS thing, even with the best spot prices. As far as the free tier goes, it provides marginal computing power and really just exists so people can learn how to setup and run EC2 instances for free. In that respect it could be really useful to you if you're interested in being able to do this sort of thing in the future without waiting for someone to post a guide. Amazon has page full of tutorials to show you how it all works as well if you don't want to just dive in head first without looking. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/spot-tutorials/
-
@Fablio2:
withdraw button without a possible login?
- xolokram
ps. due to increased amount of miners i've changed the sharetarget to 0x01FFF... again
-
@Fablio2:
withdraw button without a possible login?
- xolokram
use protoshares signmessage command
"i want to withdraw xxPTS" signed by payout address
-
del
-
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:10060
then it times out and try after 10 seconds -- DDOS'd?
-
i think beer changed payout to 0.5 now :) happy day!
-
i will upgrade the server now. there will be a (hopefully just) small downtime. don't panic.
- xolokram
-
i will upgrade the server now. there will be a (hopefully just) small downtime. don't panic.
- xolokram
What did you change? Just switched back to your pool with ~60 cores. More will follow.
Can you give me some info about using your miner on linux?
I am currently just compiling the git src with "make -f makefile.unix". Does it use sse/avx ... ?
-
ok, server transfer done. everything -should- be ok now.
i increased the share target, so slow miners will get some sh/m too.
i decreased the payout barrier to 0.33 (should be low enough now)
i'm thinking about using this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002)
sneak preview of v0.6 is available at github (for mac&linux, windows will have to wait for a binary)
including sphlib support (more col/min) & high-rejection rate fix (atm it's more of a workaround) for machines with lots of threads
@john:
depending on sphlib's possibilities
- xolokram
ps. btw fyi these are not valid pts addresses:
PjY4znBjpWeB1FacVno7Xj5MVMTdR1PQ2K
PvfQUa2kRLKirTFaufseULNYZBZTJbw3Q
Puvo6ACZofFYgtD4dSRntCgz89vttbglsV
Pnz6TREc5pKWLsZEZiS4iqDoVB92E3Zrcz
PeNE2FMMx1Dwx2EyqqUstaVqoQ7mVChs2w
PfeS6x1zvjn12AXmA3GmCtsAGd77n7NE1
-
">i decreased the payout barrier to 0.33 (should be low enough now)"
thanks for that. continuing to receive steady payouts.
-
How come my balance decreased to 0 ??
user : PiPYf4mwPYngMnD6cK6vQemBFh58UXa9Bg
-
maybe you got paid :)
How come my balance decreased to 0 ??
user : PiPYf4mwPYngMnD6cK6vQemBFh58UXa9Bg
-
humm maybe but I don't see it in /user.. and in my wallet i'll wait a bit maybe it gonna come later..
-
aaallright.. I got paid.. my wallet was 44 hours late... had to restart it..
-
I noticed that update appear last night when I was setting up some miners, have it running on everything now, shall see how we go!
-
I just pushed a short perl script for pretty output of my current mining stats to GitHub.
https://github.com/spommerening/ptstools
If someone finds this useful too - please help yourself.
(Linux with Perl, Lynx should be installed)
-
sneak preview of v0.6 is available at github (for mac&linux, windows will have to wait for a binary)
including sphlib support (more col/min) & high-rejection rate fix (atm it's more of a workaround) for machines with lots of threads
Hey @xolokram, please add Intel AVX/SSE4 SHA512: https://github.com/moinakg/pcompress/tree/master/crypto/sha2
It's 30% faster than sphlib. + you should add command line argument to toggle sse4/avx, because cpuid on Amazon AWS reports about AVX, but actually Xen hypervisor doesn't support it.
Also could you please add total unconfirmed balance to the user stats page?
-
I just pushed a short perl script for pretty output of my current mining stats to GitHub.
https://github.com/spommerening/ptstools
If someone finds this useful too - please help yourself.
(Linux with Perl, Lynx should be installed)
Thanks! Very useful.
My usage:
#!/bin/bash
cd "$(dirname "$0")"
while true
do
out="$(./status_ptsweb.pl addr1 | tail -n 6)"
clear
date
echo
echo "addr1"
echo "$out"
sleep 30
done
-
Thanks.
You don't mind me including your wrapper script in the repo?
(already included...)
-
Need more miners for pool. No Block after 90 minutes :(
-
Hi All,
Im waiting for the protoshare-qt connect to the ps network to take my wallet up to date since 30 hours.
I can not start to joint to mine until it my wallet is not success.
I added all ip-s what I found on the forum.
Anyone can add the ip wha I should add my protoshare qt?????????
-
Hi All,
Im waiting for the protoshare-qt connect to the ps network to take my wallet up to date since 30 hours.
I can not start to joint to mine until it my wallet is not success.
I added all ip-s what I found on the forum.
Anyone can add the ip wha I should add my protoshare qt?????????
If you're pool mining (vs solo mining with the client) you don't need the protoshares-qt to be sync'd. Just need the address to pass to the pool. Your payouts will show up when the client finally gets a node or two and can sync.
-
@Riverhead. : OK. thank you. I started the mining with ptsminer and I hope my wallet will be available soon.
-
WTH? Am I banned or something?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pu9jKnnjZvNZ52WrVLda84SLMb1grvTBR5
My shares don't appear anymore, despite the fact I've added several workers (maybe 10-15) for few hours, just to test. And my 0.3 pts were paid despite not reaching the 1 pts threashold.
Do you seriously think I'm operating a botnet or something?! With 15 computers?!
Please unban me!
Thanks.
-
WTH? Am I banned or something?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pu9jKnnjZvNZ52WrVLda84SLMb1grvTBR5
My shares don't appear anymore, despite the fact I've added several workers (maybe 10-15) for few hours, just to test. And my 0.3 pts were paid despite not reaching the 1 pts threashold.
Do you seriously think I'm operating a botnet or something?! With 15 computers?!
Please unban me!
Thanks.
Read back a few posts. The payment threshold was lowered to 0.33 due to the diff change. Your link looks just fine. The payment rule at the top hasn't been updated so I can understand why it might seem odd if you weren't following this thread.
-
Read back a few posts. The payment threshold was lowered to 0.33 due to the diff change. Your link looks just fine. The payment rule at the top hasn't been updated so I can understand why it might seem odd if you weren't following this thread.
OK, sorry about this :) those guys really need a graphical interface or something better than their 70's text interface.
The user page still states "personal payouts are executed, when you reach at least 1.0 pts" btw.
-
those guys really need a graphical interface or something better than their 70's text interface.
nah, bro.
-
@Devilfish: Magyar vagy? :-)
-
@Devilfish: Magyar vagy? :-)
google is telling me that means "are you hungarian", I'm afraid not, I'm Australian.
-
@devilfish: OK.Thank you. :-)
@xolokram: I have a problem with the v0.5. I have to mine behind firewall therefore I have to route the traffic with haProxy package. :( :(
With 0.5 I can not do it because of wired options.
Can you send me an option for me?
0.4 is works but I don't want to loose the updated 0.5 version.
-
Server problems ? It doesn't connect
-
Server problems ? It doesn't connect
For me the same - seems to be the server...
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:111
-
Back online!
-
yep, short downtime, but should be ok now, sorry.
and sorry for the rare updates currently, i'm working on a new version for the miner mostly
i'm currently testing sphlib & the avx/sse support glitchboy mentioned (thanks for that)
also i added the memory option (but it looks like 512mb is still the best one (at least for me), but it's always good to have an option)
looks like everything is ok here in the thread, nothing to answer ... wth? ;D
- xolokram
-
yep, short downtime, but should be ok now, sorry.
and sorry for the rare updates currently, i'm working on a new version for the miner mostly
i'm currently testing sphlib & the avx/sse support glitchboy mentioned (thanks for that)
also i added the memory option (but it looks like 512mb is still the best one (at least for me), but it's always good to have an option)
looks like everything is ok here in the thread, nothing to answer ... wth? ;D
- xolokram
Thanks for your great work.
Will you upload the new version to your git repo? I would love to test it.
The 256MB option is usefull for servers with a lot of cores but less RAM (i have a 24 core with only 8 GB).
-
yep, short downtime, but should be ok now, sorry.
and sorry for the rare updates currently, i'm working on a new version for the miner mostly
i'm currently testing sphlib & the avx/sse support glitchboy mentioned (thanks for that)
also i added the memory option (but it looks like 512mb is still the best one (at least for me), but it's always good to have an option)
looks like everything is ok here in the thread, nothing to answer ... wth? ;D
- xolokram
Thanks for your great work.
Will you upload the new version to your git repo? I would love to test it.
The 256MB option is usefull for servers with a lot of cores but less RAM (i have a 24 core with only 8 GB).
plus two but I want to run it on an older system I have here.
I'd run that 24 core @ 12 threads.
-
xolo I am having an issue receiving payouts. I am mining PTS using your 0.5Windows miner and the linux miner. I had no problems with your XPM pool, and I have checked my payout address is correct. My local wallet says it is synched. Since yesterday I should have had 3 payouts according to the users page and the payouts page yet my wallet is showing 0.0PTS still.
Edit, Nevermind I checked the block numbers and my wallet was out of sync. After a close and reopen I got it sorted out.
-
/edit1:
;)
/edit2: i will just re-use this post
new ptsminer v0.7 EXPERIMENTAL/TOO LATE?/BEEEEER EDITION *UPDATED-#3*
for ptsweb.beeeeer.org (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org) & #beeeeer.org @ Freenode
linux / github: source code here (https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer)
windows binary: v0.7 x64 RC1 -> ptsminer_v07b_x64.zip (http://www.mediafire.com/download/gezxz50ncr90veg/ptsminer_v07b_x64_bundle.zip) (64 Bit, experimental, fastererer™!!!!!!) *updated-#3* incl. 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix
(containing GENERIC (INTEL&AMD) , SSE4 and AVX version (INTEL&AMD))
new optional parameter, check the usage example below
- AVX / SSE support (thx to glitchboy)
- SPHLIB support
- RAM option (new parameter!)
- smaller rejection problem bugfix
- reduced thread priority of worker-thread
choose <version> depending on your CPU and mining implementation you want to use
usage: ptsminer_<version>.exe <payout-address> <threads-to-use> [memory-option] [mode]
memory-option: integer value - memory usage
20 --> 4 MB per thread (not recommended)
21 --> 8 MB per thread (not recommended)
22 --> 16 MB per thread (not recommended)
23 --> 32 MB per thread (not recommended)
24 --> 64 MB per thread (not recommended)
25 --> 128 MB per thread
26 --> 256 MB per thread
27 --> 512 MB per thread (default)
28 --> 1024 MB per thread
29 --> 2048 MB per thread
30 --> 4096 MB per thread
mode: string - mining implementation
avx --> use AVX (ptsminer_avx.exe)
sse4 --> use SSE4 (ptsminer_avx_*.exe & ptsminer_sse4.exe)
sph --> use SPHLIB (ptsminer_avx_*.exe, ptsminer_sse4.exe, ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe)
examples:
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
using AVX on 4 threads and 512 MByte RAM per thread (default)
ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
using SSE4 on 8 threads and 1024 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 2 25 sph
using SPHLIB on 2 threads and 128 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 12 24 sph
using SPHLIB on 12 threads and 64 MByte RAM per thread
build notes:
boost library & YASM required for compilation!
currently the mode parameter has to be set manually on linux machines (fix will come later), no autodetection atm
sudo apt-get install yasm
i expect some problems with the compilation as i've not tested the miner on every linux / mingw distrubution out there... be patient, dont panic
compiler warnings on the SPHLIB files are alright (incl. sph_sha2.c, sph_sha2big.c & md_helper.c)
and next difficulty coming in fast...
problems with compilation? adapt some of the things from --> HERE (http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=798.0) (thanks to donschoe, don't forget to DONATE!!)
I can't test on OSX. Maybe someone can say if the compilation works on OSX??
KNOWN ISSUES:
1) on Amazon EC2 instances AVX is permitted (?!?) --> the miner crashs <-- SSE version is working fine, you'll have to set SSE4 mode manually
2) OSX compilation errors due to byteswap & *i-forgot-urghs* thread priority(?)
todo:
- abandoned addresses payout script
- fix that bug "crashing after share submission" on windows
- add option to choose mining code optimization manually (avx,sse,sphlib)
- xolokram
ps. cmake file is not up-to-date, i will fix that asap
pps. using 32 bit linux distribution could be problematic... will look into that later
note --- quick dirty 32 bit linux distribution workaround: replace "elf64" in makefile.unix by "elf"
-
v0.7 crashes on share submit for me, win7 64, default memory settings (no number)
-
Just read after installing another node using GitHub directly... wondered why it asked me for yasm ;-)
Thus I have a 0.7 running on Debian Linux 7.1 64bit flawlessly now. Seems to make more collisions / min...
(unfortunately no direct comparing possible due to very different nodes...)
Good work! Thanks!
-
share submission's working fine on all my test systems
which is the last line you see in the output?
(please, PM me or even better use IRC --> freenode #beeeeer.org, so this thread and especially the last post will not polute everything with tech support stuff)
- xolokram
ps. rejections are not 100% gone due to the client<->server communication delay still causing a few rejects, but it should be better now
-
v0.7 crashes on share submit for me, win7 64, default memory settings (no number)
Same here, win7 64, 4 threads default 512
Edit: After using the AVX/SSE version it still crashes after a couple of submits
-
Problems with 0.7 miner (github version 38047d66731), on Windows 7 64bit, AMD FX8350 CPU, CPM is about 30% lower than version 0.6.
Amazon EC2 compiles source okay (32 core instance), but crashes with illegal instruction + core dumps - probably due to new instructions being used?
-
can you try the sphlib version of the miner for your AMD CPU?
(see (new) mediafire link in announcement post)
- xolokram
ps. yes, maybe ec2 instances are permitted to use them, haven't checked it yet, will do
-
Thanks for the quick AMD fix, runs fine, but no improvement in speed over the 0.6 version - getting 140.4 c/m | 2.4 sh/m on AMD FX8350 @ 4.2Ghz.
-
0.7 AVX version works fine on 3570K & 4670K CPU's, but doesn't work on 3570 (without "K")
(http://sigma.berdyansk.net/avx3570k.png)
-
On debian 7 64 bit keep getting "Unsupported avx level"
-
CPU?
btw i added a "known issues" information to the original miner update post, so we dont have to repeat everything
- xolokram
-
Intel Hex-Core, VPS from digitalocean.
-
output of
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags?
looks like avx/sse is disabled
/edit:
yep, it's disabled! see post below, no avx, no sse4
-
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
-
0.7 is working perfect on my Windows 8.1 machine, using AVX c/m has gone from ~120c/m to ~140c/m
and on my Azure Ubuntu 13.10, using sphlib c/m has gone from ~90c/m to ~100c/m
Thanks xolo !!
-
I'm noticing an increase from ~80 c/m to ~100 c/m on my 4 core Xeon E31220. I'm also experiencing the crashing problem on my i7 920. I'm wondering if it's cause it doesn't have AVX, but does have SSE4 and it's trying to default to AVX?
-
I'm also experiencing the crashing problem on my i7 920. I'm wondering if it's cause it doesn't have AVX, but does have SSE4 and it's trying to default to AVX?
Same problem on my Q9550 (and my E6700, but it doesn't even support SSE4).
-
KNOWN ISSUES:
1) on some machines the windows binary crashs right after the first share submission (see next posts), looking into that issue
I am having the same issue across most of my hardware, I know it's already known, but if you need any assistance with testing, drop me a line and I will be happy to help. I can test on workstations with i7's, i5's, C2Qs, and Xeon servers with dual 51xx, E54xx, X53xx, X55xx, and X56xx series procs. (most running windows 64bit OS's) Just shy of 200 cores total.
Figure it's the least i can contribute. :)
Keep up the great work!
-Xornof
-
In linux, I'm getting Illegal instruction
./ptsminer PqdF4T6iamfsUdibkWy1zfMGKZQiUNvSSa 2
-
trying to get OSX working at the moment, having trouble with the compilation, will report back if I find the fix. If anyone has managed to get it running let me know.
-
lame,
CentOS box ain't running it either...yet to try a ubuntu box but I think i might hold off as it probably won't work (knowing my luck)
and now she decides to come good...nfi why, had all the dependencies installed :S
Nah she's down again...back to the old version for me
-
I have 0.7 mining fine on a Xbuntu i5 laptop. Just using the addy and 4 as parameters.
Went from ~51 c/m to ~78 c/m. Not sure if those stats are comparable between versions.
Using the sphlib on my FX-8350 using 7 cores (1 saved for cgminer) I went from ~140 to ~180 c/m. So far stable but only at 10 valid 0 reject.
-
OSX issues seem to be with "Endian.h" being included in sha512, I managed to point to where it is but I get a bunch of other compilation errors:
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
sha512.c:257:17: error: use of undeclared identifier 'be64toh'
lengthPad[0] = BYTESWAP64(sc->totalLength[0]);
^
sha512.c:103:23: note: expanded from macro 'BYTESWAP64'
#define BYTESWAP64(x) be64toh(x)
^
sha512.c:258:17: error: use of undeclared identifier 'be64toh'
lengthPad[1] = BYTESWAP64(sc->totalLength[1]);
^
sha512.c:103:23: note: expanded from macro 'BYTESWAP64'
#define BYTESWAP64(x) be64toh(x)
^
sha512.c:265:27: error: use of undeclared identifier 'be64toh'
*((uint64_t *) hash) = BYTESWAP64(sc->hash);
^
sha512.c:103:23: note: expanded from macro 'BYTESWAP64'
#define BYTESWAP64(x) be64toh(x)
^
3 errors generated.
I'll keep playing, learning heaps at the moment :D
-
20 cores @ 256mb/core
(https://whatimg.com/i/c6q6zs.png)
-
I've gone from about 120 to 160 on my 4770k. Using 7 threads 1gb per thread. Thanks Xolo.
-
I just changed my 4670k to a different mobo because I got the 4770k for $200. But it's only getting about 1/4 col/m it was getting before. Its not the new miner because I've tried the old one too. What could it be?
-
How much RAM do you have and how much are you allocating to each core?
-
4gb. 512mb per thread.
-
Just my feedback on the v0.7. I compiled myself in ubuntu 13.10, it seems to run much slower on i7-4770k compared to v0.6 (about 1.1sh/m slower). But v0.7 runs faster on my i7-2600k. So weird.
-
4gb. 512mb per thread.
Did you try 256? Probably wouldn't go any lower
-
I found the reason, heat sink wasn't all the way on. CPU was running super hot. Hope I didn't do too much damage.
-
Lol ok that makes sense then, hopefully everything is damage free
-
uff wow, didnt expect that much feedback over the night :)
"Illegal instruction" is caused by AVX while being permitted (i guess it's a vps you're using?), SSE4 could work, but needs some adjustment on the code, because it will auto-prefer the AVX code.
on machines with SSE4, but no AVX, it -should- choose the SSE4 code. but it looks like that this detection fails somehow on some machines... *urghs*
and don't us the "sh/min" (shares/min) measure for comparison, it's highly depending on what the server is accepting at the moment, and this is fluctuating (col/min is a better measure)
thanks for all the (positive & negative) feedback
i should add a manual option to choose from sphlib, avx or sse4
- xolokram
ps. i'm off to work
-
0.7 AVX version works fine on 3570K & 4670K CPU's, but doesn't work on 3570 (without "K")
(http://sigma.berdyansk.net/avx3570k.png)
my i5 3570 (without "K" :D) works fine for me with avx/sse. running win7 64b
-
can someone on a i7 with SSE4 but -NO- AVX check if replacing
-march=native
with
-march=corei7
in
makefile.unix
then compile, then run, helps?
- xolokram
ps. sorry, i'm currently not able to test is
-
Managed to compile it under FreeBSD 9.2 x64.
Just had to change '#include <endian.h>' to '#include <machine/endian.h>' and comment out this low-priority stuff.
Mining @167c/m using an i7 2600k, 7 threads, 2048MB/thread. Pretty acceptable I guess.
-
Just my feedback on the v0.7. I compiled myself in ubuntu 13.10, it seems to run much slower on i7-4770k compared to v0.6 (about 1.1sh/m slower). But v0.7 runs faster on my i7-2600k. So weird.
Have exactly the same issue. My I7-4770 dropped from 85 c/m to 70 c/m running on 2 cores.
-
from v0.6 to v0.7? OS? VM or native?
does it state "using sphlib" or "using AVX/SSE" at the beginning of the miner?
i have a wild guess that the changes to the makefile (esp. -march=native) are not suitable for all distros/systems/configs
- xolokram
ps. @all: don't compare sh/m, use col/m
-
Just my feedback on the v0.7. I compiled myself in ubuntu 13.10, it seems to run much slower on i7-4770k compared to v0.6 (about 1.1sh/m slower). But v0.7 runs faster on my i7-2600k. So weird.
Xolokram my own pc running native ubuntu 13.10 running v0.6 get about 190c/m & 3.9sh/m. After running v0.7, its about 160+c/m & 2.8sh/m. At the beginning of the miner it says "using avx/sse". It's quite a big difference.
Just to put things in perspective my other pc i7-2600k also running native ubuntu13.10 in v0.6 about 160c/m, in v0.7 about 190c/m. Much improvement but sh/m drops.
-
15 % Rejected shares is it normal or too many?
-
i had 1-2% on one machine and 4-6% on other machines yesterday
i would say 15% is too much
can you PM me a part of your console output of the miner with some information about REJECTED shares?
- xolokram
-
hi, i am not familar with linux, could anyone help me plz. when i make the linux source code on centos6.2-64 ,it give me this information:
[root@AY131122190016007b5aZ src]# make -f makefile.unix
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
sha512.c: In function ‘void _final(SHA512_Context*, uint8_t*, int, int)’:
sha512.c:257: error: ‘be64toh’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [obj/sha512.o] Error 1
how can i make it work?
-
hi, i am not familar with linux, could anyone help me plz. when i make the linux source code on centos6.2-64 ,it give me this information:
[root@AY131122190016007b5aZ src]# make -f makefile.unix
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
sha512.c: In function ‘void _final(SHA512_Context*, uint8_t*, int, int)’:
sha512.c:257: error: ‘be64toh’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [obj/sha512.o] Error 1
how can i make it work?
I'm not absolutely sure, but I guess to remember that this error message was displayed before I installed 'yasm'. Did you install 'yasm' before compilation?
Yasm is a new dependency for the 0.7 miner.
-
yes i have installed yasm ,it give me this information when i execute :
[root@AY131122190016007b5aZ src]# yasm
yasm: No input files specified
just now I found a patch from google, and added belowing code to sha512.c:
#include <sys/param.h>
#ifdef _BSD
#include <sys/endian.h>
#elif defined(__linux__)
#include <byteswap.h>
# if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
# ifndef htobe64
# define htobe64(x) bswap_64 (x)
# endif
# ifndef be64toh
# define be64toh(x) bswap_64 (x)
# endif
# else
# ifndef htobe64
# define htobe64(x) (x)
# endif
# ifndef be64toh
# define be64toh(x) (x)
# endif
# endif
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
but when i make it againg ,
it shows me a lot of "*** has not been declared" and
"*** was not declared in this scope"
-
I am running a CentOS 5.7 64 on cloud server , does it matter?
-
I am running a CentOS 5.7 64 on cloud server , does it matter?
Just before you stated to run CentOS 6.2.
I guess CentOS 5.7 is way too old... you won't have all necessary dependencies available.
-
can someone on a i7 with SSE4 but -NO- AVX check if replacing
-march=native
with
-march=corei7
in
makefile.unix
then compile, then run, helps?
- xolokram
ps. sorry, i'm currently not able to test is
I'm on a VPS that disables avx. I also had to comment out the selection of the avx assembly code in sha512.c:
if (pc->proc_type == PROC_X64_INTEL || pc->proc_type == PROC_X64_AMD) {
/*if (pc->avx_level > 0) {
sha512_update_func = sha512_avx;
} else*/ if (pc->sse_level >= 4) {
-
OK,thanks jabbaah, I will send you 1 pts.
-
I'm on a VPS that disables avx. I also had to comment out the selection of the avx assembly code in sha512.c:
if (pc->proc_type == PROC_X64_INTEL || pc->proc_type == PROC_X64_AMD) {
/*if (pc->avx_level > 0) {
sha512_update_func = sha512_avx;
} else*/ if (pc->sse_level >= 4) {
Seems to do the job - for me - using "strange behaving" VPS's - too. Looks good.
-
yep, this is pretty much disabling the AVX detection
while keeping the SSE4 detection
i'll be not much around here in the next hours
i hope i can fully get back to the issues (AVX, windows bug) by tomorrow :o
- xolokram
-
hi, i am build ptsminer on centos 6 , it seems better now, bot i got this information:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_thread
what can i do? i have already installed boost-devel
-
hi, i am build ptsminer on centos 6 , it seems better now, bot i got this information:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_thread
what can i do? i have already installed boost-devel
I checked the ptsminer compilation on a CentOS 6.3 VM now. Following is the way it works...
Use the makefile.unix.no-chrono - fire up your favourite editor and change line 27 as follows:
Old:
-l boost_thread$(BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX)
New:
-l boost_thread-mt$(BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX)
Now compile using
make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono clean
make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
Voilà! You should get a brand new ptsminer on CentOS. ;-)
-
hi,jabbaah
I follow your steps ,butt still get this:
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha51 2_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl ,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost _thread-mt -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
(i just installed glibc-static ,but still not work)
-
I am also getting some crashing with v0.7
win7 64bit
q9550 (supposed to have sse4.1, but not being reported by cpuz)
8GB ram
running v0.5 works fine (no memory option :( )
running v0.7 starts, i get a message saying no AVX, and then it switches to SPHLIB, then after receiving work it crashes.
not sure why its trying to failover to SPHLIB first instead of SSE4
-
hi,jabbaah
I follow your steps ,butt still get this:
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha51 2_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl ,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost _thread-mt -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
(i just installed glibc-static ,but still not work)
It's missing the zlib file: /usr/lib64/libz.so
Just install zlib-devel. (for CentOS 6.3: zlib-devel-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64)
-
with version 0.7 im getting more reject shares than version 0.5
in 314 shares 67 were rejected
the speed still the same 78m
i dont see an~ything better on version 0.7
im using amd fx8350 8 cores clocked to 4.2ghz
-
I just posted fixes for the MacOS build at https://github.com/jave27/ptsminer (https://github.com/jave27/ptsminer) and submitted a Pull request for xolokram. I'm not positive that the CMake changes will work for Windows or 64-bit Linux, though. That should be tested before it gets merged.
-
to: jabbaah
thanks you , I got it work now!
-
I got multiple machines mining PTS to ptsweb.beeeeer.
Is there a way to see which machine sends which share on http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/ ?
(I'm not sure if every ptsminer really works)
-
Which cloud services do you guys use? I was introduced to it with DigitalOcean, then someone pointed me to HP Cloud (which I'm currently using). After that, the same person pointed me to WarriorVPS, which I'm heavily considering moving to.
DigitalOcean and HP Cloud both have Debian 13, however, WarriorVPS has only Ubuntu. Seeing as Debian and Ubuntu go, practically hand in hand, I see no issue. Anyone wanna sound off?
-
Are clouds still cost effective for pool mining pts?
-
if they are free, yes :)
-
.conf file doesn't make any connections.
It starts out with 1 connection, and I have added all of the 'addnode' connections I could find.
listing them one at a time in the debug window gets them started up, but why not in the .conf file?
what is a good .conf file for the -qt?
thanks
-
It is whining on collisions when I put on 24 threads w/ 26 memory option.
Or whenever I go over 12 threads.
-
It is whining on collisions when I put on 24 threads w/ 26 memory option.
Or whenever I go over 12 threads.
The 0.5a miner is doing the same with 3 threads and default memory size.
EDIT: The 0.7 is stating collisions with 4 threads and default memory on my cloud instance.
-
xolokram,
Can I have the old link of version 0.6, the 0.7 is not properly running in my Ubuntu machines and I need to add more machines.
After compiling v0.7 in Debian 7 and Ubuntu I'm getting Illegal instruction after running. Fyi, any idea how to fix this?
-
I just posted fixes for the MacOS build at https://github.com/jave27/ptsminer (https://github.com/jave27/ptsminer) and submitted a Pull request for xolokram. I'm not positive that the CMake changes will work for Windows or 64-bit Linux, though. That should be tested before it gets merged.
I tried this on my mavericks system and got the following upon make:
sph_sha2.c:626:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible
type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
sph_sha2.c:641:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha256_context *' (aka
'sph_sha224_context *') from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
In file included from sph_sha2.c:653:
./md_helper.c:134:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./md_helper.c:184:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./md_helper.c:206:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sha2_round'
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^~~~
sph_sha2.c:650:16: note: expanded from macro 'RFUN'
#define RFUN sha2_round
^~~~~~~~~~
sph_sha2.c:613:1: note: candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument
of incomplete type 'const void *' to 'const unsigned char *'
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:653:
./md_helper.c:248:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
I was going to have a play today to see if I could work out what was going on. Were you getting the same errors on make that I was (something to do with the endian.h include?)
-
after mining for a week or so, commodo finds malware in the miner, here's a screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dszlyattlss0g74/-pBgTuf5PF
anyone else run into this? why didn't it spot anything earlier?
-
Maybe the software is used on bot nets so is getting picked up as malware?
-
nearly 6 hours without block found!
Is there anything wrong?
Maybe I will move to another pool since I have no patience now.
Besides, I test v0.7 on Suse 11. It proves to be very useful.
And I have more memory to use, 8G per core. Can you offer a optimizaiton for this situation?
The 0.6 version of yasm is too old.
Then I test yasm v1.2. It's OK.
So, you can add this issue to help others.
-
nearly 6 hours without block found!
Is there anything wrong?
Just paid, was a very big block by the looks of things
24378 (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/block/24378) 2013-11-23 07:28:21 2556 / 1533736 -> 0.04437 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
-
nearly 6 hours without block found!
Is there anything wrong?
Just paid, was a very big block by the looks of things
24378 (http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/block/24378) 2013-11-23 07:28:21 2556 / 1533736 -> 0.04437 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
got that. Really big.
But I thought maybe the decrease of pool's workers cause the pool, as a whole, become weak.
So we have to wait long time for a block.
Am I right? Just become a miner for two days.
-
Hi,
I could biuld all miners before without problems;
but 0.7 gives me this:
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
sha512.c: In function ‘void _final(SHA512_Context*, uint8_t*, int, int)’:
sha512.c:103:32: error: ‘be64toh’ was not declared in this scope
#define BYTESWAP64(x) be64toh(x)
^
sha512.c:257:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘BYTESWAP64’
lengthPad[0] = BYTESWAP64(sc->totalLength[0]);
^
make: *** [obj/sha512.o] Error 1
I even compiled yasm + gcc from source and that didnt help lol.
-
MarcusDe,
Since this is the error:
error: ‘be64toh’ was not declared in this scope
you need to make sure be64toh() is defined.
You can run "grep -r be64toh /usr/include/" to see what header file defines be64toh and add it to the top of sha512.c or sha612.h.
For example, my machine shows "/usr/include/endian.h", so I would add
#include <endian.h>
to the top of sha512.c.
The solution/problem could be a little different, but missing the correct include is one of the more common reasons for this error.
-
@erko
Thanks for help!
Well, there is no endian.h and be64toh in (recursive saerch)
/usr/include
/usr/local/include
or anywhere else ;-/
OS is old suse enterprise, without support.
Any more ideas?
edit:
Heh, I found those defines in system which have them, I will try to put them manually in ptsminer files.
edit2:
Helped myself and others with problem like this:
in sha512.c added:
#include <byteswap.h>
#define be64toh(x) __bswap_64 (x)
Works, on defaults c/m moved from 190 to 200.
-
@xolokram
Hey xolo, that new miner is quite fast! Just one small problem: After 1 hour of mining, the miner will "forget" to hand in the collisions it finds. It still finds them, but it never gives them to your server....
So since it never hands them in, it lost shares right :'(
That sucks, because there was a lot of collisions last night for me.
-
@xolokram
Hey xolo, that new miner is quite fast! Just one small problem: After 1 hour of mining, the miner will "forget" to hand in the collisions it finds. It still finds them, but it never gives them to your server....
So since it never hands them in, it lost shares right :'(
That sucks, because there was a lot of collisions last night for me.
How did you find out this?
-
Its simple, there are no lines with:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
-
if
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHAREis missing, then you didnt receive the answer of the pool
the submission is executed with the
collision foundline
- xolokram
ps. letme check the server, this and the very high blocktime are strange
/edit:
ok, if you ask me someone's trying to fu-- up the pool (or is using a totally broken status update script)
more than 5k connections on port 80 while 4k miners are connected...
-
I have a Core i7 920 with 18GB of memory. When I try to mine with ptsminer_64bit_avxsse, it crashes as soon as it submits a share. I am simultaneously mining LTC with cgminer but I get the crash whether I am dual-mining or not.
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 30018560 <-> 56516275 #28 @ 1385219750 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
---- Crash Window from Windows 2008R2 SP1
[Window Title] ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe
[Main Instruction] ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe has stopped working
[Content] Windows can check online for a solution to the problem.
[V] View problem details [Check online for a solution and close the program] [Close the program]
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 528e69bc
Fault Module Name: ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 528e69bc
Exception Code: c000001d
Exception Offset: 0000000000031cca
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.272.7
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: c83f
Additional Information 2: c83fe5dcee39ca79e8546e33b9d46547
Additional Information 3: 828d
Additional Information 4: 828d26da80543ab0a822ef661126f65f
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
-----
JHProtoMiner is also usually unable to connect or, when it can, it doesn't detect any collisions on beeeeer. It does work on ypool and gets about 40-50 more c/m but I'd rather be mining on beeeer if I can.
-
/edit:
ok, if you ask me someone's trying to fu-- up the pool (or is using a totally broken status update script)
more than 5k connections on port 80 while 4k miners are connected...
??? Have noticed she's been slooooow today but figured it was just the difficulty rising...
-
If you have problems with dependencies on ubuntu 12.04 (64 bit), install this package
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/miniupnpc/1.6-3ubuntu1/+build/2989598/+files/libminiupnpc8_1.6-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb
(Direct link)
-
Am considering maxing out RAM to 32GB. Is there a realistic expectation that v.7 would actually perform much better w/ greater RAM available than is used in the default settings?
-
if
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHAREis missing, then you didnt receive the answer of the pool
the submission is executed with the
collision foundline
- xolokram
ps. letme check the server, this and the very high blocktime are strange
/edit:
ok, if you ask me someone's trying to fu-- up the pool (or is using a totally broken status update script)
more than 5k connections on port 80 while 4k miners are connected...
So, I shouldn't have to worry then? Good stuff. Thanks!
-
...
you should at least check your miner('s connection) and probably restart it
i checked the connection from my side and everything seems fine (incl. receiving work, finding collisions, submitting work, receiving work result)
which OS and which miner do you use?
- xolokram
ps. btw i'm thinking about implementing xpt protocol to let you guys mine with jh's miner
-
I am also getting some crashing with v0.7
win7 64bit
q9550 (supposed to have sse4.1, but not being reported by cpuz)
8GB ram
running v0.5 works fine (no memory option :( )
running v0.7 starts, i get a message saying no AVX, and then it switches to SPHLIB, then after receiving work it crashes.
not sure why its trying to failover to SPHLIB first instead of SSE4
bringing this back up, did you fix the SSE4 issue for the windows miner yet?
also im seeing a 29% reject rate on one of my miners. what can cause that?
-
...
you should at least check your miner('s connection) and probably restart it
i checked the connection from my side and everything seems fine (incl. receiving work, finding collisions, submitting work, receiving work result)
which OS and which miner do you use?
- xolokram
ps. btw i'm thinking about implementing xpt protocol to let you guys mine with jh's miner
I'm using your miners. 1x 0.5a (3 threads) on Windows 7 Enterprise and 2x 0.7a (2 threads each) on Debian 7.1 via HP Cloud.
-
Hmm, the miner is showing over 1200 submitted shares but my user stats page is only showing around 300 of them. Is the stats page just slow to update? I've also noticed a huge dip in performance for seemingly no reason. Last night it was doing 125 c/m and 2.6 sh/m. Woke up this morning to check on it and its at 57 c/m and 0.9 sh/m.
EDIT: I just closed the miner and restarted it. Now its running at 145 c/m and 3.4 sh/m. Does it get slower and slower over time?
-
Hmm, the miner is showing over 1200 submitted shares but my user stats page is only showing around 300 of them. Is the stats page just slow to update? I've also noticed a huge dip in performance for seemingly no reason. Last night it was doing 125 c/m and 2.6 sh/m. Woke up this morning to check on it and its at 57 c/m and 0.9 sh/m.
EDIT: I just closed the miner and restarted it. Now its running at 145 c/m and 3.4 sh/m. Does it get slower and slower over time?
That is what I noticed as well.
-
Hmm, the miner is showing over 1200 submitted shares but my user stats page is only showing around 300 of them. Is the stats page just slow to update? I've also noticed a huge dip in performance for seemingly no reason. Last night it was doing 125 c/m and 2.6 sh/m. Woke up this morning to check on it and its at 57 c/m and 0.9 sh/m.
EDIT: I just closed the miner and restarted it. Now its running at 145 c/m and 3.4 sh/m. Does it get slower and slower over time?
That is what I noticed as well.
Is it new 0.7 version or older?
-
Hmm, the miner is showing over 1200 submitted shares but my user stats page is only showing around 300 of them. Is the stats page just slow to update? I've also noticed a huge dip in performance for seemingly no reason. Last night it was doing 125 c/m and 2.6 sh/m. Woke up this morning to check on it and its at 57 c/m and 0.9 sh/m.
EDIT: I just closed the miner and restarted it. Now its running at 145 c/m and 3.4 sh/m. Does it get slower and slower over time?
That is what I noticed as well.
Is it new 0.7 version or older?
I noticed it with 0.5a and 0.7a
-
Is it new 0.7 version or older?
Yes, v0.7a running on a Core i5 2500k @ 4.7GHz. 4 threads and default memory usage.
-
@gsrcrxsi / high rejection rate:
on v0.7: i'm currently experiencing this on my own, it looks like the rejects are coming in "chunks" with 5-6 rejects in a row, then everything is fine again.
is this was you're seeing too?
i don't have a hint right now what's the cause, i'll have to dig deeper through the server logs / mining code >:(
/edit: and i just got home, i'll check the code now.
@cjrhoades / afr33sl4ve:
this is getting a little confusing, so you're using v0.5 and v0.7 ? both with the same problem.
and both of you encounter the "collision found" but -no- "submitted share -> <whatever>" line in the miner output?
if this happens and you dont see enough shares in the last blocks (user stats), then it looks like the submission is not reaching the server, thus you don't get an answer from the server about your submitted share. the miner itself counts every share that has been submitted regardless of the/an answer from the server about that submission.
also please be aware, that your most recent shares are currently not shown in the user stats, as these are bound to found blocks, and the last found blocks is 2.5 hours old
- xolokram
-
No, no. I'm getting rejections and collisions, however, they're all being submitted. I'm not having the no submissions issue.
I'm seeing, though, lower hashrates as time goes on, with both 0.5a and 0.7a.
-
I'm seeing, though, lower hashrates as time goes on, with both 0.5a and 0.7a.
this can happen if your miner loses the connection to the server due to a bug in the col/min counter (v0.7)
i'll commit a fix in a few minutes
v0.5 is strange, as this version doesnt have the mentioned bug. maybe your cpu is becomming hot and throttles down? can you check that please.
-
@cjrhoades / afr33sl4ve:
this is getting a little confusing, so you're using v0.5 and v0.7 ? both with the same problem.
and both of you encounter the "collision found" but -no- "submitted share -> <whatever>" line in the miner output?
No. The shares are being submitted fine. Here's my concern.
After a fresh start:
(http://puu.sh/5r3gS)
After ~40 minutes:
(http://puu.sh/5r5tL.png)
After ~9 hours:
(http://puu.sh/5r2Zj)
Notice the big dip in performance over time? The longer the miner runs, the slower it gets. Closing and restarting it brings it back up to maximum speed.
also please be aware, that your most recent shares are currently not shown in the user stats, as these are bound to found blocks, and the last found blocks is 2.5 hours old
- xolokram
Ok, here's what I know. I've put in 1400-1500 shares so far. All the blocks shown in the user stats add up to ~900 shares. If it hasn't been updated for 2.5 hours, then during that time I would have had to put in ~550 shares and been doing around 3.6 sh/m to have that many missing. But I've been doing far less than that. So either its taking longer than that to update or some shares aren't being counted. Or my math is wrong in which case please ignore this. What I do know is that every time a collision is found I see "[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE" so I know they're getting to you.
-
so the "decreasing" performance
is was just a stupid bug in the counter or to be more precise, like i mentioned before, the col/min & sh/min counter was not reset properly on a connection loss
i fixed that with the last github commit, i'll update the windows binary in a few minutes
if your miner states ~1400 shares and the last blocks contains less than that, then the submission didnt reach the server
/edit1:
OR
the only thing i can image of is that the pool software crashed sending some of the shares of the current round into nirvana (for all users) :(
let me check the time of the last restart of the pool software
(this should also be the cause of your connection loss & buggy col/min+sh/min reset)
- xolokram
-
That data must be from different computers. The clocks on the images say's so ;)
OR
Same computer, but different order of the images; the last one should be the first one. Just saying.
-
oh, thanks for pointing that out @GoldTiger69
this makes your statement look weird @cjrhoades
-
Thank you for your hard work, xolo. Nevertheless, I've been experienceing the same problem with the 0.7a in Ubuntu server 13.10. After several hours, the miner solwdown by 50% or so. When you re-start the miner, it comes to normal again.
-
it's not slowing down (or at least it shouldn't from a coding perspective)
but the counter had a bug, showing wrong values after a connection loss / reconnect
pull the latest github update :D
i'm sorry for the inconvencience
btw. last pool software restart (crash?) was 6 hours ago!
-
Same computer, but different order of the images; the last one should be the first one. Just saying.
You'd be correct. Same computer, different times. The 9ish hour long one actually came first. I started it up with similar performance to whats in the first screen shot, went to bed, and woke up with what you see there and took a screenshot. Later on I restarted it for additional screenshots to show the decreasing performance issue. Sorry if that happens to look shady.
it's not slowing down (or at least it shouldn't from a coding perspective)
but the counter had a bug, showing wrong values after a connection loss / reconnect
I see. Thanks for fixing it.
-
pull the latest github update :D
Thanks, new compile went without a hitch, looks good so far.
I had the counter showing <10c/m this morning, i initially sobbed :'( , and then i checked my overnight totals and they were up 10% from the night before, woot... :)
Thanks for all your efforts!
-
Having some issues with the latest linux x64 build on any of the 3 cloud services I've tried (DC, AWS & HP). Didn't have these kind of issues a few days ago (pretty sure I was using v0.6 or lower).
I've tried Debian 7 and almost all versions of Ubuntu to no avail.
After downloading and installing the github function, I clone ptsminer from github, then cd to its directory, and when I attempt to makefile, this error occur:
ubuntu@ip-xxx-xx-x-xx:~/ptsminer/src$ make -f makefile.unix
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/cpuid.o cpuid.c
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
make: yasm: Command not found
make: *** [obj/sha512_avx.o] Error 127
If anyone can link me to v0.6 / v0.5 or share a solution to this issue, that'd be highly appreciated!
-
I think you just need to install yasm
-
build notes:
boost library & YASM required for compilation!
sudo apt-get install yasm
-
build notes:
boost library & YASM required for compilation!
sudo apt-get install yasm
Oh, I should have paid more attention to details like that. Thank you very much for pointing that out!
Was able to makefile and launch the miner. Just gotta disable AVX (currently reading about how to do it).
-
How do I update the github?
I try to run the command "git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer" and it returns that it already exists. I think I need to modify it to update as opposed to just simply creating the directory.
-
How do I update the github?
I try to run the command "git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer" and it returns that it already exists. I think I need to modify it to update as opposed to just simply creating the directory.
I don't know if updating is possible, so here's what I just did on one of my instances:
WARNING! I'm a newbie. :)
cd
rm -rf ~/ptsminer
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
-
running
git pullin the ptsminer git directory
should do the job
- xolokram
ps. working on the windows fix / binaries
-
Hi Xolo thanks, love the pool. Just curious why the first post no longer has any info on the pool? Hope you aren't closing it?
-
With the new miner, after 10 - 15 mins it start getting REJECTIONS one after the other. I re-started it and then again, after 10 mins or so, the rejections started again. I noticed this version is like 10% faster than the other one (120c/m vs. 110c/m), but the rejections rate went to high now.
As all ways, just letting you know.
Edit: NVM, it's been almost an hour and everything it's been fine :)
-
The github was updated again!
-
with the newest version i get this on debian wheezy:
main_poolminer.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
main_poolminer.cpp:541:19: error: ‘Init_SHA512_avx’ was not declared in this scope
main_poolminer.cpp:545:19: error: ‘Init_SHA512_sse’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [obj/main_poolminer.o] Fehler 1
-
Sorry if this was worded poorly. Try again?
On version 7+ what sort of performance increase should I see if I switch from 512 MB per thread (the default) to 1024 MB per thread?
Are we expecting like 5% to 10% or is it something like 40%+??? Thanks for any advice.
Thanks.
Am considering maxing out RAM to 32GB. Is there a realistic expectation that v.7 would actually perform much better w/ greater RAM available than is used in the default settings?
-
xolokram, would you mind to pay the abandoned addresses? I had an address for each machine, like:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PibtpUeHCXStrAkcD7buVmeyj9UPcEvwxE
But since about 9 days ago I'm mining using the same address for all the miners.
Thank you!
-
I ran a simple test on one i7 4770 machine. Started an instance of 1 thread with 512 MB and another 1 thread instance with 1024 MB. The 1024 MB seems to be doing more than double the amount of work. Not sure if I am reading this correctly, but it seems very impressive.
Sorry if this was worded poorly. Try again?
On version 7+ what sort of performance increase should I see if I switch from 512 MB per thread (the default) to 1024 MB per thread?
Are we expecting like 5% to 10% or is it something like 40%+??? Thanks for any advice.
Thanks.
Am considering maxing out RAM to 32GB. Is there a realistic expectation that v.7 would actually perform much better w/ greater RAM available than is used in the default settings?
-
@yago:
send me a pm (as a reminder with the information i'll need)
@ram usage:
more ram is better, when the ram is fast enough!!
@seraphim:
still having problems with the latest github commit?
maybe make a fresh&clean clone
@ptsminer:
new windows version out (it's not final yet, still testing)
http://www.mediafire.com/download/52fdhw2c3ny81ti/ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_new.zip
now containing several binaries: generic (amd / intel), sse4 and avx
for more information please read: http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg9657#msg9657
LATEST GITHUB / LINUX USER:
with the current version @github you'll have to set the mining code manually as parameter, read the updated thread post (see above) or binary help (auto-detection will be fixed soon)
@network difficulty:
:(
- xolokram
ps. i'm off now, see you tomorrow, keep calm, don't panic, everything will be fine :)
-
yep. still failing.
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2big.o sph_sha2big.c
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/ptsminer/src -I/home/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
main_poolminer.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
main_poolminer.cpp:544:20: error: ‘Init_SHA512_avx’ was not declared in this scope
main_poolminer.cpp:548:21: error: ‘Init_SHA512_sse4’ was not declared in this scope
make: *** [obj/main_poolminer.o] Fehler 1
-
checkout newest update
it's working on my debian wheezy machine here :o
- xolokram
ps. if it's not working PM me or come to IRC tomorrow, i'm out!!
-
Hello :)
I'm running the v0.7 64 Bit binary, but how many threads and memory should I use for optimal performance? I have a i5-4670K with 8gigs of RAM
-
Commands I used to install and compile 0.7, Ubuntu and Debian
cd
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev zlib1g-dev libboost-dev yasm
sudo git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer.git ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
#If error in chrono, try
make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
-
@xolokram
EDIT: I see you made a new miner for Windows, I'm testing it now, but just a heads up, the issue below still aplies to the 0.5a miner.
What's up? :D I have some unfortunate news, the earlier "rejection" problem I listed is occurring again, this time using the 0.5a 64 bit miner!
The 0.5a version has never done this before but now it too is not sending the shares to the server...
I'm not sure if this is my internet, or the server... I am using a satellite connection with at least 700ms ping times, but this has never happened in the old 0.2 and 0.4 versions.
Other than that, I wouldn't mine at any other pool! Great job for a one man show xolo!
-
I also was trying to figure out what's optimal. It would be nice if the app could auto-tune itself but my guess is that the defaults are already right for you: 4 cores, multithreaded is 8 threads; 8 x 512MB is 4GB ram required. If you took 1GB ram per thread you'd be swapping all the time. It's possible 4 threads at 1 GB might be better. Why not try those two and let us know what works better? i.e. appending one of these in your command line:
a) 8 27 or
b) 4 28
I found that I can use my machine okay if I just choose "7" threads (on my i7 4770 that has 8 threads avail.)
Hello :)
I'm running the v0.7 64 Bit binary, but how many threads and memory should I use for optimal performance? I have a i5-4670K with 8gigs of RAM
-
new windows version out (it's not final yet, still testing)
http://www.mediafire.com/download/52fdhw2c3ny81ti/ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_new.zip
now containing several binaries: generic (amd / intel), sse4 and avx
for more information please read: http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg9657#msg9657
Found a minor bug(or maybe just a documentation issue) with the new win64 binaries you provided. Specifically, the SSE4 binary.
If you just specify cores and ram (and not the instruction set), the SSE binary ignores the memory setting. For example:
ptsminer_sse4.exe %walletaddress% 4 = 4core, 512MB a core
ptsminer_sse4.exe %walletaddress% 4 28 = still does 4cores, 512MB a core
ptsminer_sse4.exe %walletaddress% 4 28 sse4 = 4 cores, 1024MB a core
The AVX binary seems to work fine with just cores and ram settings in my testing. I haven't noticed anything with the intel binary, since in my testing I was using the sph switch already.
This was tested on mainly non-AVX machines running Win7 x64 Ultimate/Pro, Server 2008R2, and 1 Server 2003x64 box.
Proc wise, here are the non-avx ones: 2 C2Q Q6600(SSE3), 1 C2Q Q9550, 1 C2E X7900(SSE3), 2 Xeon DP 5150's(SSE3), and 4 Xeon DP X5365's.
All of the above seem to exhibit the same issue, not a major deal, by any stretch. Note: I only tested using 26/27/28 memory settings and thread values of 2,3,4,6,8.
Side note: Interestingly enough, i do get decent gains using the sse4 binary over intel/sph on the SSE3 based procs. It doesn't seem to be as significant as the gains on the SSE4.1 based procs, but that may just be other factors such as less memory bandwidth, older chipset, etc.
Thanks again!
-
thank you joele
and thank you crz & flashoftheblades <-- give them some hugs (@irc)
@memory settings:
it's highly depending on your system and the bottlenecks that arise from tweaking this parameter; if memory & cpu is fast enough 1024 can be the best solution for you. my tests showed that decent systems are working best with the 512 option. other & older systems may switch to 256 mb (=older) or 2048 (=high-end) or even higher/lower.
@xornof:
thank you for the bug report, will fix this asap
like i said these are not the final v0.7 binaries :D
the advantage of the sse4 binary for sse3 cpus is caused by the auto-optimization which is enabled in the 4 binaries.
ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe include MMX, (3DNow), SSE and SSE2
ptsminer_sse4.exe includes MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSE4.x
ptsminer_avx.exe includes MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.x and AVX
thus it looks like we're lucky and the code for the sse4 binary has been optimized using up to SSE3, giving you a small advantage over the _amd and _intel version (using SPHLIB)
if it would use SSE4 instructions (which is possible, because i compiled it with SSE4 support) too, it would crash on your SSE3 cpus
@miner: in general
there's still enough room for optimization, e.g. i found a sse3 version for the sha computation (but i'll have to check the code first). i'm not sure about the avx binary and bulldozer cpus, i think i should split this binary into avx-intel and avx-bulldozer to give the binaries a small extra boost.
also i'll have to re-enable the auto-detection for sse4/avx for the linux build.
but first i'll create the "payout abandoned addresses"-script today (later today, it's sunday, pts has to wait a little :) )
- xolokram
-
Thanks for the windows update. I'm seeing good gains on the sse4 version vs v0.5a on my Q9650 and Q9550 machines.
I noticed something odd. The memory option doesn't seem to be working. On my q9550 box, which has 8Gb ram (DDR2-800), using 27 or 28 results in the same 2GB of ram usage.
-
@xornof:
thank you for the bug report, will fix this asap
like i said these are not the final v0.7 binaries :D
No, thank you sharing your work with the community, we all really do appreciate it.
I have some baseline averages now that it has been a few days, pretty positive across the board. I am seeing somewhere between 10-20% increase(in c/m) to the older SSE3 machines since .7 dropped. My SSE4.1 and AVX/SSE4 based machines are seeing between 20-40% (right at 40% in the case of my newer Xeon E5-4650 based 32core monsters)
DISCLAIMER: These numbers are just my observations, your results may vary...
Anyhow, i am rambling again. :P I hope you save some personal time for you and yours, cheers! :)
-
I noticed something odd. The memory option doesn't seem to be working. On my q9550 box, which has 8Gb ram (DDR2-800), using 27 or 28 results in the same 2GB of ram usage.
See my post above, if you add the sse4 option to the end of your command(for the sse4 binary), it will then correctly pick up the memory option. I thought it was me at first, it drove me nuts until i discovered the workaround. xolokram is working on the bugfix.
In the meantime, To use 4 cores and 4GB RAM on the windows SSE4 binary, use:
ptsminer_sse4.exe %walletaddress% 4 28 sse4
Hope that helps!
-Xornof
-
Hello, I'm trying to compile ptsminer on MacOS Maverick and I get this error:
AcidCrash ~/mining/ptsminer/src $ make -f makefile.unix
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
c++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
c++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
sph_sha2.c:33:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
sph_sha2.c:628:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
sph_sha2.c:643:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha256_context *' (aka 'sph_sha224_context *') from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:79:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
./sph_md_helper.c:136:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:186:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:208:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sha2_round'
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^~~~
sph_sha2.c:652:16: note: expanded from macro 'RFUN'
#define RFUN sha2_round
^~~~~~~~~~
sph_sha2.c:615:1: note: candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument of incomplete type 'const void *' to 'const unsigned char *'
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:250:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
2 warnings and 6 errors generated.
make: *** [obj/sph_sha2.o] Error 1
Anyone got ptsminer working on MacOS?
-
Hi,
i updated the windows binaries --- see the v0.7 post (http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg9657#msg9657) (& OP)
download: here (http://www.mediafire.com/download/dks3r25d1bibzc2/ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_newer.zip)
- fixed the memory parameter bug
- adjustments to the mingw64 makefile
- split avx binary into intel version & amd version
/edit: STOP, AVX VERSION IS NOT USING AVX AUTOMATICALLY @ WINDOWS, FIX INCOMING *fixed*
i think the pool will switch to a score-based payout system like this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002) soon
- xolokram
ps. github update will follow soon
pps. i have the strange feeling, that the avx code is slower that the sse4 code?!? ok, seems to be just fluctuacting values, will check that with a longer testing period
-
Hello, I'm trying to compile ptsminer on MacOS Maverick and I get this error:
AcidCrash ~/mining/ptsminer/src $ make -f makefile.unix
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
c++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
c++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
sph_sha2.c:33:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
sph_sha2.c:628:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
sph_sha2.c:643:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha256_context *' (aka 'sph_sha224_context *') from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:79:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
./sph_md_helper.c:136:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:186:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:208:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sha2_round'
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^~~~
sph_sha2.c:652:16: note: expanded from macro 'RFUN'
#define RFUN sha2_round
^~~~~~~~~~
sph_sha2.c:615:1: note: candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument of incomplete type 'const void *' to 'const unsigned char *'
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:250:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
2 warnings and 6 errors generated.
make: *** [obj/sph_sha2.o] Error 1
Anyone got ptsminer working on MacOS?
There is a link in the OP to some mac compilaton instructions, IIRC they may not be specific to ptsminer...
I haven't tried to compile ptsminer for mac osx yet but i own a few, I'll give it a try on my MacBookPro on Mavericks tonight and I'll see if I can find/fix the issue you are describing.
I'll also give it a try on my OSX10.6.8 iMac too for those still behind a few releases.
X
-
i updated the windows binaries --- see the v0.7 post (http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg9657#msg9657) (& OP)
download: here (http://www.mediafire.com/download/dks3r25d1bibzc2/ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_newer.zip)
Testing the "newerer" binaries now.
i think the pool will switch to a score-based payout system like this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002) soon
Something similar to slush's? That's might work out pretty well, interested to hear what you have in store for us next.
X
-
Hello, I'm trying to compile ptsminer on MacOS Maverick and I get this error:
AcidCrash ~/mining/ptsminer/src $ make -f makefile.unix
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
c++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
c++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
sph_sha2.c:33:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
sph_sha2.c:628:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
sph_sha2.c:643:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha256_context *' (aka 'sph_sha224_context *') from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:79:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name (e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
./sph_md_helper.c:136:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:186:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:208:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sha2_round'
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^~~~
sph_sha2.c:652:16: note: expanded from macro 'RFUN'
#define RFUN sha2_round
^~~~~~~~~~
sph_sha2.c:615:1: note: candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument of incomplete type 'const void *' to 'const unsigned char *'
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:250:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
2 warnings and 6 errors generated.
make: *** [obj/sph_sha2.o] Error 1
Anyone got ptsminer working on MacOS?
There is a link in the OP to some mac compilaton instructions, IIRC they may not be specific to ptsminer...
I haven't tried to compile ptsminer for mac osx yet but i own a few, I'll give it a try on my MacBookPro on Mavericks tonight and I'll see if I can find/fix the issue you are describing.
I'll also give it a try on my OSX10.6.8 iMac too for those still behind a few releases.
X
Thank you so much xornof! Waiting for your feedback!
-
Hey Xolo, have you seen this?:
The pool, as listed in the topic: "Mining pool list - Updating",
PTSPool:
web:54.238.185.113
Its miner on github goes to the miner of beeeeer pool. Is it strange?
I try to compile it, then when running, the parameter of PTSPool can't be used.
It's beeeeer's miner.
So where is PTSPool's miner?
Thank you!
author=Clark link=topic=1024.msg10553#msg10553 date=1385272289
That's odd
-
Cute, I get to 0.32 and the pool stops confirming shares :(
-
@anybody who know the answer
What was the verdict on the miner not submitting the collisions to the server?
btw, it is still happening on the latest release of 0.7 miner. I'm using the AVX version using 4 threads and 1 GB memory/thread. Though it also happens with the sse4 version too.
Is there a version I can use to mine overnight? I'd rather not leave the miner on all night only to see lots of unsubmitted collisions...
Sorry if it sounds like Im complaining xolo, I just want to let you know that it's still happening. Keep up the good work, best pts/xpm pool ever made!
EDIT: can I use the older version of the pts miner still? Or will the server not count the collisions it finds? (like version 0.5 or 0.4)
-
EDIT: can I use the older version of the pts miner still? Or will the server not count the collisions it finds? (like version 0.5 or 0.4)
I may be speaking out of turn, but AFAIK, there was no problems continuing to use the .5a Hotfix1 version, it just doesnt have the AVX/SSE4 instruction set code. I go back and use it when i am troubleshooting an issue on the .7 miner(to eliminate hardware as a cause). I generally don't see the need to go back to the .4 or earlier versions.
Hope that helps!
X
-
Thank you so much xornof! Waiting for your feedback!
Just got home, I'll start looking at it in a few minutes... Will let everyone know what i find.
@xolo: FYI - I did get a chance to put the "newer" .7 RC2 windows binaries through the paces on most of my windows servers this afternoon, no issues so far. Thanks!
~Xornof
-
EDIT: can I use the older version of the pts miner still? Or will the server not count the collisions it finds? (like version 0.5 or 0.4)
I may be speaking out of turn, but AFAIK, there was no problems continuing to use the .5a Hotfix1 version, it just doesnt have the AVX/SSE4 instruction set code. I go back and use it when i am troubleshooting an issue on the .7 miner(to eliminate hardware as a cause). I generally don't see the need to go back to the .4 or earlier versions.
Hope that helps!
X
Thanks! You mention that the new 0.7 version gives you no issues in Windows... Is anyone else having this issue where the miner fails to send the collisions to the server?
-
@xolokram, do you, or a team of people including yourself, manually update the payout page? I've noticed that during the days hours for me (GMT -7), it updates far more often than during the night hours.
EDIT: Actually, I haven't noticed a single share pop up on mine for over 2 hours now.
EDIT 2: Too 2 hours, but a new one finally showed up. Is this normal behaviour?
-
No problems with the newest build. C/M count is stable, memory options working again, and rejection rates are w/i usual specs. 10-18% gains over v5. Here are some stats on my rigs.
i7 3930K at 4.7 (12Thread) : 300+ C/M
i7 820 (5T): 110 C/M
Largest Azure servers (8C/16GB, Ubuntu 13) with 8Threads: 100 C/M
i5 3337U (3T): ~75 C/M
i5 3470T (3T): ~90 C/M
Sandy/Ivy Bridge Celerons (2T): ~44 C/M
Thanks for sorting it out, Xolo!
-
I'm trying to run ptsminer on a digitalocean.com machine. This is what happens:
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SPHLIB (no avx/sse4)
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Compilation:
root@machine:~/ptsminer/src# make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/cpuid.o cpuid.c
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
g++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
sph_sha2.c: In function ‘void sph_sha224_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2.c:628:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_sha2.c: In function ‘void sph_sha256_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2.c:643:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha256_context* {aka sph_sha224_context*}’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha224_short(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sph_sha224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from ‘const void*’ to ‘const unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^
sph_sha2.c:615:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void sha2_round(const unsigned char*, sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha224_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)’:
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
g++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2big.o sph_sha2big.c
sph_sha2big.c: In function ‘void sph_sha384_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2big.c:191:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_sha2big.c: In function ‘void sph_sha512_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2big.c:202:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha512_context* {aka sph_sha384_context*}’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha384_short(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sph_sha384(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from ‘const void*’ to ‘const unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^
sph_sha2big.c:178:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void sha3_round(const unsigned char*, sph_u64*)’ [-fpermissive]
sha3_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u64 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha384_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)’:
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/root/ptsminer/src -I/root/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
CPUInfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 2
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
:(
-
I'm super new and When I dl and run the thing in the OP it just closes instantly. Is there something I'm missing?
-
@HaunterV:
windows? you have to edit the .bat file and run it
@goldtiger:
nope, i've not seen the post. i guess they just linked to my github and the current version is using a hardcoded pool address, i should re-add a convenient method for parameters :)
but i've seen this
"YPool is officially boycotted until they fix the 'bug' preventing them from processing transactions. Please use other pools."
a little too late imho and i guess they won't give a fu--
@lordfirefox:
can you give us more details on your problem?
@Silver_Pharaoh:
v0.5 & v0.4 work too, i'm kinda riddled by your issue...
@xornof / hayz:
thanks for your help / information
@Gekko:
which OS?
let me re-check the no-chrono makefile
@afr33sl4ve:
it's 'normal', because the payouts depend on confirmations of the found blocks. thus if there's a gap between to found block because of the randomness (bad luck) then there will be a gap for the payouts too.
- xolokram
ps. i'll implement the 'pay abandoned addresses' script now
-
@Gekko:
which OS?
let me re-check the no-chrono makefile
Ubuntu 13.10 64bit
Edit: btw: same error (Segmentation fault) when compiling with makefile.unix !
Edit 2: SOLVED! The machine has only 512MB RAM. Starting ptsminer with option "26" (256MB) works!
-
@HaunterV:
windows? you have to edit the .bat file and run it
Yes Windows.
I'll try, again.
-
@Silver_Pharaoh:
v0.5 & v0.4 work too, i'm kinda riddled by your issue...
- xolokram
ps. i'll implement the 'pay abandoned addresses' script now
@xolokram
Don't feel bad bro, I'm stumped too. I used the 0.5 miner (not the 0.5a version) and it too failed to submit shares.
Since this has never happened before on the 0.5a and 0.5 miner, did you update your servers? Maybe something broke it. Or is it because I have a 800 ms ping time?
This won't be an issue if I can get some help to make a batch file to restart the miner every hour... Does anyone know how to do this using .bat files?
-
is this thing crunching another very large block?
im also at .32xxx PTS with no payout and no updates on new blocks.
-
Delete
-
@jedixjarf:
it's working here (and for 3000+ other miners), check your connection
@gsrcrxsi:
the payouts depend on the (120) confirmations of the found blocks. thus if there's a gap between to found block because of the randomness (bad luck) then there will be a gap for the payouts too.
@Silver_Pharaoh:
the latency shouldn't affect the communication too much (except causing some rejects)
but not sending / receiving data properly at all is really strange
@all:
i removed the payout barrier (still some people have to reach the minimum value for a valid transaction (0.0001 PTS))
(it will probably be re-activated once all abandoned addresses are gone)
too many PMs about abandoned addresses & complains about "stuck" payouts
- xolokram
ps. this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002) will be next
pps. payout barrier changed to 0.2
-
I just want to use this post to say thank you for all your hard work!
-
thanks, it does appear the the 3-4hr gap was a large-ish block.
since you removed the payout barrier, how does that work exactly. im still showing .327xx PTS on my user page.
-
First off, im a PTS noobie. I was seeing if I could get some info from yall.
What is c/m? Im guessing sh/m is share/min but not sure what c/m is.
Is there some c/m hardware database somewhere?
Thanks
-
First off, im a PTS noobie. I was seeing if I could get some info from yall.
What is c/m? Im guessing sh/m is share/min but not sure what c/m is.
Is there some c/m hardware database somewhere?
Thanks
c/m = collisions per minute.
I'd like a database as well.
-
@all:
i removed the payout barrier (still some people have to reach the minimum value for a valid transaction (0.0001 PTS))
(it will probably be re-activated once all abandoned addresses are gone)
too many PMs about abandoned addresses & complains about "stuck" payouts
- xolokram
ps. this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002) will be next
Nice, that will stop the cheaters, but what will that mean for me and my troubled miner? Will my share value go down because it fails to hand in its work?
-
is this thing crunching another very large block?
im also at .32xxx PTS with no payout and no updates on new blocks.
Yes this is exactly what I was experiencing too, it took hours for the blocks to start confirming again. New blocks were piling up.
-
First off, im a PTS noobie. I was seeing if I could get some info from yall.
What is c/m? Im guessing sh/m is share/min but not sure what c/m is.
Is there some c/m hardware database somewhere?
Thanks
c/m = collisions per minute.
I'd like a database as well.
Thanks for the info. I'm still a little lost though, trying to find some numbers to pipe in an equation. Right now if I'm doing 300 c/m whats the rough avg for PTS/day?
-
fairy dust payout #1 (http://btsblock.com/block/000000258811158db0ad67f17f3a230fb6c25f61535871fe1812a799de2cd62d) & #2 (http://btsblock.com/block/000000a2e540277ec60f2a17e3a046b778a0af8de205326a84f0e0c02ac6d708) - finally confirmed... :o
payout barrier changed to 0.2
-
Is it me or is beeeeer.org down? I have 3 cloud miners but it doesn't seem to have updated since for the last hour or 2...
I want to check the speed with different cores and find out which gives the best price/ performance value
-
Is it me or is beeeeer.org down? I have 3 cloud miners but it doesn't seem to have updated since for the last hour or 2...
I want to check the speed with different cores and find out which gives the best price/ performance value
Just you. Working fine for me across all my cloud instances and local instances.
-
Is the the difficulty incrased since the last 2 days or we are only unlucky? 15 blocks discovered in 30 hours...
The good news is that I've been paid and pts arrived on my wallet. Good job! ;D
PS: any news about compiling ptsminer on Macos Xor? Thank you for your job guys!
-
Is the the difficulty incrased since the last 2 days or we are only unlucky? 15 blocks discovered in 30 hours...
The good news is that I've been paid and pts arrived on my wallet. Good job! ;D
PS: any news about compiling ptsminer on Macos Xor? Thank you for your job guys!
Less miner equals less block per day but more reward per block, avg payout is unchanged by number of miners if the timeframe is big enough - less miners mean longer timeframe, alot of miners shorter.
-
Hi!
I'm a PST noob, can anyone explain me what VL, RJ and ST means? I think RJ is rejected...
This is a sample:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-26 13:41:57 | 113.7 c/m | 3.7 sh/m | VL: 79 (88.8%), RJ: 10 (11.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
There is a way to convert the share/minute (or collision/minute) to PST ?
Thanks!
-
Hi!
I'm a PST noob, can anyone explain me what VL, RJ and ST means? I think RJ is rejected...
This is a sample:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-26 13:41:57 | 113.7 c/m | 3.7 sh/m | VL: 79 (88.8%), RJ: 10 (11.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
There is a way to convert the share/minute (or collision/minute) to PST ?
Thanks!
VL = Valid, RJ = Reject, ST = Stale
-
Not sure if this was posted already but www.coins-e.com exchange has started taking Protoshares (PTS).
Coins-e has new management now. Some improvements are obvious: 2FA (two-factor authentication) now available and a new help desk software. The site looks to be getting better.
-
Is beeeeer down? I have reboot on linux and the client says only:
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
-
Is beeeeer down?
No, here I'm connected.
-
Rebooted on windows and it works.
The linux client got a bug...
-
What instructions should I use for one of the new haswell processers.
-
Hawesome ... lot of great work here ...
Has there been a benchmark on the most optimal combination of thread vs memory allocated ? I'm currently mining at 5 thread with 4 GB each (I have 32 GB on my beast of alienware). For the moment each workers seem to pop-out 97 C/m on average.
Could I have a better yield with another config ?
Thx.
-
@hiddenvalleyranch:
AVX
@Moonover:
4 GB each is a overkill, the memory access will probably be your bottleneck, try 512 first, then 1024, and see if it increases your performance
@Sy:
thank you for clarification
- xolokram
-
@xolokram
Thanks ! Rough test showed an improved sh/m and c/m with 512mb.
512mb : 115 c/m + 5 sh/m
1024 mb: 113 c/m + 3.5 sh/m
4096 mb: 95.3 c/m + 3.2 sh/m
N00b question here, which is the most important, c/m or sh/m ?
I'm now testing how many thread I can put on without slowing down my alienware too much ... 12 thread at 512mb seem to do it ...
Let see if my laptop catches fire during the night ...
-
c/m is more important for your overall performance
sh/m fluctuates depending on the pool configuration
please don't try to kill your hardware! :D
i don't know if it's a good idea to mine with a laptop
- xolokram
ps. there's a issue with the pool/new miner producing rejects for one round of received work (until the next work is received), this happens rarely, i'll work on that asap
-
@xolokram
Noob. Wondering if I should be using a different address for each machine I'm using. Using the same address VL total isn't combined, unlike another mine I use.
-
using multiple miners on the same payout addres is no problem
you can do that
-
@xolokram
Miner still fails to hand in shares, but it was pretty stable yesterday. Only 2 or so miner restarts.
Would a screen shot help at all? -- I'll edit this post and upload one when it crashes.
Even though there is very little difference on the screen?
If I don't catch the miner in time, eventually it will stop finding collision altogether until I restart it.
EDIT: Screenshot: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7OL6MIZst3YQWV5bGs0OVkxdVk/edit?usp=sharing (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7OL6MIZst3YQWV5bGs0OVkxdVk/edit?usp=sharing)
Hopefully that link works.
-
@xolokram
Thanks ! Rough test showed an improved sh/m and c/m with 512mb.
512mb : 115 c/m + 5 sh/m
1024 mb: 113 c/m + 3.5 sh/m
4096 mb: 95.3 c/m + 3.2 sh/m
N00b question here, which is the most important, c/m or sh/m ?
I'm now testing how many thread I can put on without slowing down my alienware too much ... 12 thread at 512mb seem to do it ...
Let see if my laptop catches fire during the night ...
If you're running 12 threads, then that means you probably have either a Sandy Bridge-E or Ivy Bridge-E i7 in your laptop. Those c/m numbers seem a little low for 12 threads. Are you using the AVX binaries? That chip will support it. Also, I find it helpful to set the process priority to low, so it doesn't interfere with whatever you're doing in the foreground. Also like Xolo said, make sure you have good ventilation for your laptop, as we're not responsible for frying hardware.
-
PS: any news about compiling ptsminer on Macos Xor? Thank you for your job guys!
Sorry, i got hung up in personal stuff and evil work crap and haven't had a chance to update. I ran into a couple snags on mavericks that i don't get in 10.7/10.8, but i have a little time tonight to work on it. I'll update as soon as i know more.
I'll be on irc too if you want to troubleshoot live.
~Xornof
-
Is beeeeer down? I have reboot on linux and the client says only:
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
Having the same issues on 2 machines, my local machine, and on a VPS. IP used: 54.201.26.128:1337 I've waited several days to see if it's a connection issue, but it doesn't clear up. Any ideas?
-
Is beeeeer down? I have reboot on linux and the client says only:
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
Having the same issues on 2 machines, my local machine, and on a VPS. IP used: 54.201.26.128:1337 I've waited several days to see if it's a connection issue, but it doesn't clear up. Any ideas?
Do all your machines use the same wallet id? I accidently put my primecoin wallet in my script and it would not connect to the server, after changing it to my pts wallet it worked fine.
-
(Why) Is ptsminer slower with higher RAM setting?
If I run ptsminer with standard settings (512 MB) I get about 475c/m or 15.3 sh/m.
If I run ptsminer with setting 28 (1024 MB) I get about 385c/m or 11.6sh/m.
-
I've been getting a ridiculous amount of rejects lately. Currently at 88.6% efficiency (2879/371). Any way to get that up a little?
-
@cjrhoades:
it's a known issue, it happens on rare occasions on a block round of received work
i'll work on that asap
@Gekko:
maybe your RAM access is the bottleneck
thus using more RAM keeps your CPU waiting for data
@wolf95:
like jedixjarf said, maybe you're using the wrong parameter for your miner
- xolokram
-
@xolokram
Xolo, I finally figured out why my miner stops sending shares! See the pic below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7OL6MIZst3YTTAtd2hDZWFILWc/edit?usp=sharing (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7OL6MIZst3YTTAtd2hDZWFILWc/edit?usp=sharing)
The miner found 2 collsions, but only sent one. After that, the miner doesn't send anymore collisions to the server, and it found the next collisions (that it doesn't send) within seconds of each other for some reason.
So it looks like my miner finds collisions to fast for it to send or something?
-
I edited the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse_EDIT-ME) file to show:
choose ptsminer_64bit_avxsse depending on your CPU and mining implementation you want to use
usage: ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe PoDBfkS6ig9c3uQT4Wiw15Qea3RhTSg7xJ 4 27
memory-option: integer value - memory usage
20 --> 4 MB per thread (not recommended)
21 --> 8 MB per thread (not recommended)
22 --> 16 MB per thread (not recommended)
23 --> 32 MB per thread (not recommended)
24 --> 64 MB per thread (not recommended)
25 --> 128 MB per thread
26 --> 256 MB per thread
27 --> 512 MB per thread (default)
28 --> 1024 MB per thread
29 --> 2048 MB per thread
30 --> 4096 MB per thread
mode: string - mining implementation
avx --> use AVX (ptsminer_avx.exe)
sse4 --> use SSE4 (ptsminer_avx.exe & ptsminer_sse4.exe)
sph --> use SPHLIB (ptsminer_avx.exe, ptsminer_sse4.exe, ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe)
examples:
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
using AVX on 4 threads and 512 MByte RAM per thread (default)
ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
using SSE4 on 8 threads and 1024 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 2 25 sph
using SPHLIB on 2 threads and 128 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 12 24 sph
using SPHLIB on 12 threads and 64 MByte RAM per thread
But still when I run the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse) it closes immediately. It has however added a bunch of other files n such in the folder I'm running the miner from.
I'm missing something aren't I? Because I'm fairly certain using the ( ProtoShares-0.2.0) miner will get me exactly 0 shares mined form here until doomsday.
-
I edited the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse_EDIT-ME) file to show:
choose ptsminer_64bit_avxsse depending on your CPU and mining implementation you want to use
usage: ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe PoDBfkS6ig9c3uQT4Wiw15Qea3RhTSg7xJ 4 27
memory-option: integer value - memory usage
20 --> 4 MB per thread (not recommended)
21 --> 8 MB per thread (not recommended)
22 --> 16 MB per thread (not recommended)
23 --> 32 MB per thread (not recommended)
24 --> 64 MB per thread (not recommended)
25 --> 128 MB per thread
26 --> 256 MB per thread
27 --> 512 MB per thread (default)
28 --> 1024 MB per thread
29 --> 2048 MB per thread
30 --> 4096 MB per thread
mode: string - mining implementation
avx --> use AVX (ptsminer_avx.exe)
sse4 --> use SSE4 (ptsminer_avx.exe & ptsminer_sse4.exe)
sph --> use SPHLIB (ptsminer_avx.exe, ptsminer_sse4.exe, ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe)
examples:
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
using AVX on 4 threads and 512 MByte RAM per thread (default)
ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
using SSE4 on 8 threads and 1024 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 2 25 sph
using SPHLIB on 2 threads and 128 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 12 24 sph
using SPHLIB on 12 threads and 64 MByte RAM per thread
But still when I run the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse) it closes immediately. It has however added a bunch of other files n such in the folder I'm running the miner from.
I'm missing something aren't I? Because I'm fairly certain using the ( ProtoShares-0.2.0) miner will get me exactly 0 shares mined form here until doomsday.
are you running an avx processor?
-
Bought a cloud droplet, signed in through my local terminal and ran the command posted in the how to thread, got back a bunch of code that I don't understand. How can I verify that I'm mining?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pp9vuZh9xPRm9iyAgdnJxV8atefuZCa8xN
-
Bought a cloud droplet, signed in through my local terminal and ran the command posted in the how to thread, got back a bunch of code that I don't understand. How can I verify that I'm mining?
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pp9vuZh9xPRm9iyAgdnJxV8atefuZCa8xN
You're going to have to be a little more specific than that. You can just wait a while and see if the stat page updates. You should also be seeing the application finding collisions and saying that the share was submitted. Keep in mind, that unless you suspended the process to a screen session, then it probably stopped if you closed your SSH session.
-
I'm running this on cloud azure now and when i launch it i see this
I have AMD proccesor 8 cores
C:\Users\Makin91\Downloads\ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_newer>ptsminer_amd.exe Pafxs
QuW66Jw8JwPU3x4Y5zgKpN8utd3cH 8 28
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SPHLIB
spawning 8 worker thread(s)
[WORKER[WORKER[WORKER1] Hello, World!
[WORKER2[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] Hello, World!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER54] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!] Hello, World!] Hello, World!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER2] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 38013325 <-> 44933262 #12 @ 1385600293 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:58:19 | 36.0 c/m | 3.0 sh/m | VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 48342900 <-> 24600733 #70 @ 1385600346 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:58:55 | 75.0 c/m | 2.1 sh/m | VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 27054011 <-> 36225315 #120 @ 1385600382 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:59:20 | 88.9 c/m | 2.2 sh/m | VL: 3 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 42388374 <-> 58261413 #142 @ 1385600376 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:59:28 | 95.7 c/m | 2.7 sh/m | VL: 4 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 4935856 <-> 9033306 #154 @ 1385600408 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:59:33 | 99.6 c/m | 3.2 sh/m | VL: 5 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 27246100 <-> 7903608 #184 @ 1385600432 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 00:59:56 | 94.4 c/m | 3.1 sh/m | VL: 6 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 11090375 <-> 2521327 #204 @ 1385600475 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Nov-28 01:00:12 | 92.9 c/m | 3.2 sh/m | VL: 7 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Is it working correctly?
i'm really new, and sorry if its a dumb question.
-
Is it working correctly?
Yes. Whenever you see 1 c/m or higher and eventually shares being submitted, it's working.
-
@xolokram
Please disregard my post above, I have found a cheap fix to my miner :
echo Run PTS miner for 30 Mins...
TIMEOUT /T 1920 /NOBREAK
taskkill /F /IM ptsminer_avx_intel.exe
start ptsminer_avx_3cores_3gb.bat (runs the miner .bat)
Run_Pts_3core.bat (runs this .bat again to kill and restart the miner)
pause >nul
Put this inside a .bat and it will launch and kill the miner every 30 minutes! Problem solved, no more "dropped shares" .
Keep up the good work Xolo, your doing great!
-
@Silver_Pharaoh:
that's a really dirty workaround :) but when it's working i'm fine with it
i was thinking about your problem yesterday and it's really odd, you were the one with the satelite connection?!
@HaunterV:
can you add a line:
pauseto the end of the .bat
and run it again? and post the complete output of the miner (+ the command you use to start it (remove your payout address))
@montecristo83+flashoftheblades:
thank you for helping
- xolokram
-
Is there a guide anywhere that explains how to get this running on Ubuntu? I’m not to clued up on building executables and stuff.
-
@recci: try these command line : http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=722.0
bitshirehashaway says it's for Debian, but it was running ok on my EC2 spot instance running Ubuntu 13 x64
Good luck !
D.
-
I just used wine and it seems to work.
What is the difference between avx, sse4, sph ?
I am running an intel core I5 on ubuntu with the experimental client, what is the best settings for me?
Also I assume when running the experimental client you dont need to put in -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 or that?
-
I just used wine and it seems to work.
What is the difference between avx, sse4, sph ?
I am running an intel core I5 on ubuntu with the experimental client, what is the best settings for me?
Also I assume when running the experimental client you dont need to put in -poolip=ptsmine.beeeeer.org -poolport=1337 or that?
Use AVX for i5's.
Here's my command line to help you out:
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe PTS_address_here 4 28 avx
| | |
# of cores | |
use 1024MB of RAM/thread |
use AVX
Just replace PTS_address_here with your address and run it. this will work if you have a quad core i5 and at least 6 GB of RAM.
@xolokram
Yes, I have the satellite connection. Ping at the time of this post was about 900 ms, which is nice considering we have 2 feet of snow and it's still snowing.
My brother can play Runescape and Mario Kart 7 without issues over my satellite internet...
-
Thanks that helped, it is running faster! ;D
-
Hi, I'm mining on beeeer now.
I have another machine without Internet.
I want to use proxy for it. Does PTSminer offer this option?
Similar to this option for minerd:
-x, --proxy=[PROTOCOL://]HOST[:PORT] connect through a proxy
Thank you very much!
-
Thanks that helped, it is running faster! ;D
You may also want to try it with 512MB per core. Depending on your exact configuration, you may see better performance.
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe PTS_address_here 4 27 avx
| | |
# of cores | |
use 512MB of RAM/thread |
use AVX
-
wow
nothing to add
:D
-
I edited the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse_EDIT-ME) file to show:
choose ptsminer_64bit_avxsse depending on your CPU and mining implementation you want to use
usage: ptsminer_64bit_avxsse.exe PoDBfkS6ig9c3uQT4Wiw15Qea3RhTSg7xJ 4 27
memory-option: integer value - memory usage
20 --> 4 MB per thread (not recommended)
21 --> 8 MB per thread (not recommended)
22 --> 16 MB per thread (not recommended)
23 --> 32 MB per thread (not recommended)
24 --> 64 MB per thread (not recommended)
25 --> 128 MB per thread
26 --> 256 MB per thread
27 --> 512 MB per thread (default)
28 --> 1024 MB per thread
29 --> 2048 MB per thread
30 --> 4096 MB per thread
mode: string - mining implementation
avx --> use AVX (ptsminer_avx.exe)
sse4 --> use SSE4 (ptsminer_avx.exe & ptsminer_sse4.exe)
sph --> use SPHLIB (ptsminer_avx.exe, ptsminer_sse4.exe, ptsminer_amd.exe & ptsminer_intel.exe)
examples:
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 4
using AVX on 4 threads and 512 MByte RAM per thread (default)
ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
using SSE4 on 8 threads and 1024 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 2 25 sph
using SPHLIB on 2 threads and 128 MByte RAM per thread
ptsminer_avx.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 12 24 sph
using SPHLIB on 12 threads and 64 MByte RAM per thread
But still when I run the (ptsminer_64bit_avxsse) it closes immediately. It has however added a bunch of other files n such in the folder I'm running the miner from.
I'm missing something aren't I? Because I'm fairly certain using the ( ProtoShares-0.2.0) miner will get me exactly 0 shares mined form here until doomsday.
are you running an avx processor?
Actually .... :o AMD processor.... goddamnit I'm dumb and kept confusing my home specs with works specs.
-
Well Mining first day, wondering how long the "block waiting for confirmations" needs usually ?
Also, since 5hours no block found within a pool ? Since yesterday usualle every 2h a block was found. Am I doing something wrong here ?
25930 2013-11-29 07:02:20 633 / 953583 -> 0.01774 PTS / 26.72 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25909 2013-11-29 04:19:25 217 / 365496 -> 0.01580 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25898 2013-11-29 03:15:31 426 / 620415 -> 0.01828 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25884 2013-11-29 01:29:18 319 / 437467 -> 0.01941 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25873 2013-11-29 00:11:38 284 / 442919 -> 0.01707 PTS / 26.63 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25863 2013-11-28 23:08:34 352 / 509240 -> 0.01840 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25853 2013-11-28 21:47:36 308 / 482558 -> 0.01699 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25844 2013-11-28 20:39:34 808 / 1481120 -> 0.01452 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25809 2013-11-28 17:15:14 434 / 1270481 -> 0.00909 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> added
-
Well Mining first day, wondering how long the "block waiting for confirmations" needs usually ?
Also, since 5hours no block found within a pool ? Since yesterday usualle every 2h a block was found. Am I doing something wrong here ?
25930 2013-11-29 07:02:20 633 / 953583 -> 0.01774 PTS / 26.72 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25909 2013-11-29 04:19:25 217 / 365496 -> 0.01580 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25898 2013-11-29 03:15:31 426 / 620415 -> 0.01828 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25884 2013-11-29 01:29:18 319 / 437467 -> 0.01941 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25873 2013-11-29 00:11:38 284 / 442919 -> 0.01707 PTS / 26.63 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25863 2013-11-28 23:08:34 352 / 509240 -> 0.01840 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25853 2013-11-28 21:47:36 308 / 482558 -> 0.01699 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25844 2013-11-28 20:39:34 808 / 1481120 -> 0.01452 PTS / 26.62 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
25809 2013-11-28 17:15:14 434 / 1270481 -> 0.00909 PTS / 26.61 PTS -> added
Read the 1st post
-
small pool maintenance incoming done?
-
small pool maintenance incoming
How much time do you plan? Active ptsminers automatically reconnect?
Tnx mate for your work!
-
server should be running again
and the miners should reconnect on their own (but checking it is never a bad idea :) )
-
server should be running again
and the miners should reconnect on their own (but checking it is never a bad idea :) )
Yessss! Miners working! :)
-
Hello, could i mine with DigitalOcean and PC, in the same time, with the same adress?
Thank you
-
Hello, could i mine with DigitalOcean and PC, in the same time, with the same adress?
Thank you
Yes, just use the same receive address.
-
Hello! I mined on 2 vps's digital ocean but I can not understand how it can be http://clip2net.com/s/6hDKFJ(this is screen from second vps its more higher)
If RJ on the screen is accepted blocks so why i see this http://clip2net.com/s/6hDLUE i think its really was accepted only first vps
whats wrong?
one server is 1 CPU+1GB second 2CPU+4GB RAM
-
Why so many being rejected?
-
the rejection rate is a known issue
i'll work on a workaround as the actual cause has not been found yet
i'll release it later by today / early tomorrow morning
- xolokram
ps. will be off for some family business today, keep calm, dont panic :)
-
How often does the user stats page update?
-
Thanks so much to whoever explained how to use avx on amazon.
I can't find your post anymore.. Too bad we didn't know that earlier :/
Could you tell me how to use AVX on Amazon???
I am running 20 spot instances with sse4 currently.
-
Thanks so much to whoever explained how to use avx on amazon.
I can't find your post anymore.. Too bad we didn't know that earlier :/
Could you tell me how to use AVX on Amazon???
I am running 20 spot instances with sse4 currently.
Yes of course I could!
But (s)he was the one that found it:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=513.msg11555#msg11555
-
i just added a small workaround for the rejection problem on whole blocks (auto-reconnecting after 3 rejects in a row) to github.
thx for the information on AVX on EC2, i didn't know that.
to the people who PM me because they are 'not able' to reach the payout barrier, i'll think of a way to execute a manual payout (e.g. using the verify message feature of the miner). give me some time.
@grigower:
i dont understand what you're trying to ask or want to know.
@ahpigsy:
some more detail please.
@grubles:
the stats are update every few minutes when there's activity on the web frontend.
- xolokram
-
Hello I'm thinking of swapping pools to beeeeer from coyote, I was wondering is there any way I can see current pool funds? in coyote there's http://162.243.45.158/ which basically shows the total pools money atm. I really would like this feature if I'm swapping to beer.
Edit:With pool funds I mean total pool balance.
-
Thanks so much to whoever explained how to use avx on amazon.
I can't find your post anymore.. Too bad we didn't know that earlier :/
Could you tell me how to use AVX on Amazon???
I am running 20 spot instances with sse4 currently.
Yes of course I could!
But (s)he was the one that found it:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=513.msg11555#msg11555
Thanks.
Anyway i tested it and the AVX (in fact all c3x instances) have negative ROI for me. They are just too expensive.
-
@ahpigsy:
some more detail please.
Seems to be working nice now. Thanks for the payments.
-
ptminer crashed in all cases except when I used the plain amd miner. so apparently I can't use avx or sse4 or anything fancy like that. is there something I can do to get those to work? I would like a speed increase :D
-
@dma88:
OS? system specs?
- xolokram
-
Thanks.
Anyway i tested it and the AVX (in fact all c3x instances) have negative ROI for me. They are just too expensive.
Hmm, It's still worth it for me...
-
Thanks.
Anyway i tested it and the AVX (in fact all c3x instances) have negative ROI for me. They are just too expensive.
Hmm, It's still worth it for me...
Hmm what do you pay per instance/hour and how many collisions/m do you get?
-
Server is down?
EDIT: recovered.
-
Thanks.
Anyway i tested it and the AVX (in fact all c3x instances) have negative ROI for me. They are just too expensive.
Hmm, It's still worth it for me...
Hmm what do you pay per instance/hour and how many collisions/m do you get?
Up to 0.18$/h.
How many collisions? no clue, I just look at how many PTS I got for how much I spent, and it was 50% profit (not huge in dollars, but huge in %..)
I haven't got any spot instance all week end though :/
-
I'm on this pool with my windows machine but on coyote with the various free trial virtual machines, mainly just because I found instructions on how to get it running by copy/pasting 3 lines of code.
This isn't working for me on Azure though (newest Ubuntu). Is there any process for beer someone can share please? I'll probably switch over everything I have to this pool then to just be in one place.
-
I'm on this pool with my windows machine but on coyote with the various free trial virtual machines, mainly just because I found instructions on how to get it running by copy/pasting 3 lines of code.
This isn't working for me on Azure though (newest Ubuntu). Is there any process for beer someone can share please? I'll probably switch over everything I have to this pool then to just be in one place.
Hey,
this code should work fine for ubuntu/debian:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix yasm screen htop
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
screen ./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads> 27
-
Thanks, that got it going for me. It seemed to stall for way too long on the first work received but seems okay once I did Ctrl+C to stop and restarted.
-
Thanks.
Anyway i tested it and the AVX (in fact all c3x instances) have negative ROI for me. They are just too expensive.
Hmm, It's still worth it for me...
Hmm what do you pay per instance/hour and how many collisions/m do you get?
Up to 0.18$/h.
How many collisions? no clue, I just look at how many PTS I got for how much I spent, and it was 50% profit (not huge in dollars, but huge in %..)
I haven't got any spot instance all week end though :/
I asked for collisions/m because i want to compare the different instances.
Maybe it is a good idea to buy 50 small instances instead of 10 larges instances.
I just put the compile/mining code in the autostart and made an image so it is no extra work for me.
-
How can I take the above code and make it into autostart?
I'm doing the tour of free offers and have the idea of making images down but didn't try AWS yet. Other places where small is 1/4 the cost of large I have noticed a small advantage in using 4x small versus 1 large, something like 4.5-5 x4 versus 17-19 hpm (not sure how that translates to collisions).
Having 10+ different PuTTY open is annoying but I have found there are some multi-tab programs to manage them.
-
nano /etc/init.d/buildminer
Insert this code:
cd ~
rm -rf ~/ptsminer
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix yasm screen htop
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
screen ./ptsminer PZbcpbARni1kLsxrwj8NHNiD44n69EMaMa 8 27 sse4
chmod +x /etc/init.d/buildminer
update-rc.d buildminer defaults
Reboot. Enjoy ;)
-
This seemed to work but I had to back out of vim because I didn't have permissions to save the file. I realized I needed to prefix the nano command with sudo then it worked... that is about the extent of my knowledge of linux :)
When I restarted, I found I can use rcconf to check what is running and buildminer is starred, so I guess it is running, but then how do I peek in on it to see its performance?
edit: I'm lost on what to do now. I ran:
screen ./ptsminer <my_addr> -whatever
and it tells me there is no such directory now
-
Did you cd into the directory?
If not, clone ptsminer again.
Edit: Sorry, didn't read the posts before your last one.
-
Did you cd into the directory?
cd ~/ptsminer/src
If not, clone ptsminer again.
Did I cd when? I thought I was setting up a file to run on autostart, but I want to make sure it is working. I basically followed the instructions with a few modifications and then when I logged onto the VM, I don't know how to check if I am mining or what.
edit: I just redid all the steps as described below and when I get to a blank new terminal after restart I did try to cd into that directory and it says:
-bash: cd: /home/azureuser/ptsminer/src: No such file or directory
---------
I just redid the steps on a new server on Azure after getting the old one manually running by the first suggestion.
First I opened a new file
sudo nano /etc/init.d/buildminer
(just added sudo because I didn't have permission without it)
I entered this into the startup script:
cd ~
rm -rf ~/ptsminer
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev libboost-$
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
screen ./ptsminer <my_addr> 1 27
I am running a small VM so set 1 for the 1 core. I left out the sse4 argument now because when I went in and manually typed this the miner would crash but work fine leaving it out and it wasn't in the first instructions.
I saved this then entered:
sudo chmod +x /etc/init.d/buildminer
sudo update-rc.d buildminer defaults
Again, I got errors without 'sudo' but it seemed to work with them.
Then I restart the server, log in and am at a command prompt. Is my miner working? How would I check?
I thought the idea is it is an autocompile/autostart script, so I can make an image of the server and just clone it a bunch of times.
-
I forgot to mention sudo. Sorry.
Enter "htop" to check the CPU load and do "sudo screen -x" to enter the screen session.
-
htop <3
anyway, how are the rejection rates?
has someone tested the 'dirty' workaround commit @github yet?
-
htop showed me near minimum CPU load and the other command said "there is no screen to be attached".
I still have to start burning through my EC2 coupon so I will try your method with that or the other services I have setup already once I have more time later.
The method for coyote's pool stopped working once I got to Azure, so maybe it is Microsoft's fault..
-
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
-
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
Same here.
-
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
Same here.
all my rigs are down too. Stuck in RJ loop and/or unable to connect... ???
-
Probably, server is down. I can't connect either ???
-
Glad I'm not the only one, only noticed cause one server went down
-
i suppose the server is down...
-
Anyone using DigitalOcean, I'd delete the servers so you don't get charged for the downtime. Windows Azure, you can just shut them down inside the management console (ie, through windowsazure.com), won't get charged while they're off.
-
Anyone using DigitalOcean, I'd delete the servers so you don't get charged for the downtime. Windows Azure, you can just shut them down inside the management console (ie, through windowsazure.com), won't get charged while they're off.
thanks
-
Orphans showing up on the user account http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/
I guess no go until further notice?
-
Orphans showing up on the user account http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/
I guess no go until further notice?
(edit) Looks like at least 2 blocks are "orphaned". Think they'll pay out when the server goes up?
-
Same here :( Just wasted 4 hours...
(http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/9500/1hof.png)
-
Since I like the ptsminer very much.
I modified very few code to make it useful in rpool. Maybe later I will fork a branch on github.
Is there anybody need it?
-
Cannot connect. Server is down I take it?
-
Cannot connect. Server is down I take it?
Yes, it's been down for at least 3 hours that I know of.
-
Cannot connect. Server is down I take it?
Its up and running to me.
-
Cannot connect. Server is down I take it?
Its up and running to me.
Hmmm down for me still :/
-
down for me still :(
-
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.
https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git
-
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.
https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git
Sounds good. Did you change anything else besides the auto failover?
-
Its aliiiiive!
-
hi,
it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience
i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this
- xolokram
ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...
-
This coin is incredibly hard to mine, I have been mining on an off for 4 or 5 days on 2 intel core i5's with 4 threads each and I still only have 0.04345 PTS. I thought is was meant to be mine-able for anybody, at this rate its not going to be profitable at all! Especially with the sky high cost of electricity in the uk....waste if time imo
-
Oops, lost whole day's mining. :(
@recci
Are you using optimized mining program? Your mining income seems one order of magnitude less than the normal value to me.
-
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.
-
Dear Xolokram,
Is this a bug? When my DSL modem was powered off and then on, ptsminer crashed.
The last message I think I saw was that it would retry after 10-seconds but I think right after that the window closed and it generated a crash dump.
For people with spotty internet connectivity you might want to try unplugging the ethernet to see how the app responds. It crashed on my Win 8.1 box.
Thanks for your continued bug fixing.
hi,
it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience
i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this
- xolokram
ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...
-
Hello Xolo, lost connection to the protoshare network has caused the orphaned blocks and that no more block generation happen every hour like before ? I just put 30cores to mine and got nothing from last night :(
-
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.
Have a job mate! and don’t expect easy money. Just pointing out that this is probably not profitable for the average user to mine.
Love how people make over blown reactions to comments :P
-
I'm totally confused about all the "collision found" and "submitted share --> REJECTED" messages.
Do the messages below mean I'm not successfully mining? Should I just go back to XPM?
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:40:51 | 109.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (82.5%), RJ: 11 (17.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65298305 <-> 63144468 #1762 @ 1386074483 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:04 | 110.6 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (81.2%), RJ: 12 (18.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36950812 <-> 30198943 #1770 @ 1386074509 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:12 | 110.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 53 (81.5%), RJ: 12 (18.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 61666229 <-> 11175757 #1798 @ 1386074502 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:15 | 111.6 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (80.3%), RJ: 13 (19.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 53826084 <-> 31172614 #1800 @ 1386074503 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:18 | 111.3 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (79.1%), RJ: 14 (20.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 16964194 <-> 40092960 #1808 @ 1386074525 by 5
[WORKER] collision found: 43809248 <-> 41984804 #1810 @ 1386074526 by 6
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (77.9%), RJ: 15 (22.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (76.8%), RJ: 16 (23.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30667112 <-> 26709513 #1820 @ 1386074490 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:29 | 111.6 c/m | 4.3 sh/m | VL: 54 (77.1%), RJ: 16 (22.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hi,
it looks like the pool completely lost the connection to the protoshares network (necessary to create work for the miners)
starting to produce orphans and being unable to give up-to-date data :( i'm sorry about this inconvenience
i'm currently restarting/reconnecting everything and checking what caused all this
- xolokram
ps. ok, everything has been restarted, i guess some of the remaining blocks are orphans too :-\
pps. looks like one of the more important nodes i use had a broken blockchain (using the vanilla protoshares client)
ppps. of course this happened while i was sleeping...
-
I'm totally confused about all the "collision found" and "submitted share --> REJECTED" messages.
Do the messages below mean I'm not successfully mining? Should I just go back to XPM?
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:40:51 | 109.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (82.5%), RJ: 11 (17.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65298305 <-> 63144468 #1762 @ 1386074483 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:04 | 110.6 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 52 (81.2%), RJ: 12 (18.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36950812 <-> 30198943 #1770 @ 1386074509 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:12 | 110.8 c/m | 4.0 sh/m | VL: 53 (81.5%), RJ: 12 (18.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 61666229 <-> 11175757 #1798 @ 1386074502 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:15 | 111.6 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (80.3%), RJ: 13 (19.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 53826084 <-> 31172614 #1800 @ 1386074503 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:18 | 111.3 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 53 (79.1%), RJ: 14 (20.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 16964194 <-> 40092960 #1808 @ 1386074525 by 5
[WORKER] collision found: 43809248 <-> 41984804 #1810 @ 1386074526 by 6
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (77.9%), RJ: 15 (22.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:23 | 111.5 c/m | 4.2 sh/m | VL: 53 (76.8%), RJ: 16 (23.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30667112 <-> 26709513 #1820 @ 1386074490 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-03 06:41:29 | 111.6 c/m | 4.3 sh/m | VL: 54 (77.1%), RJ: 16 (22.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Everything is fine, wait for blocks :D Where do you mine?
-
Clone from here and it will failover from beeeeer to rpool.
https://github.com/Troglodactyl/pts.git
Sounds good. Did you change anything else besides the auto failover?
I just added the additional pool to a list, and have it waiting for 3 seconds for work when it tries to connect. If the pool doesn't give it work it disconnects and tries connecting to the next pool. Kind of ugly with the hard coded pool list, but it was a quick hack to get my miners back up and hopefully keep them up.
-
Love how people come in here expecting easy money. Get a job if your that desperate for money, don't put your hopes into mining a digital currency.
Have a job mate! and don’t expect easy money. Just pointing out that this is probably not profitable for the average user to mine.
Love how people make over blown reactions to comments :P
So why come and tell us, we already know this, you aren't adding anything.
-
For me it seems that the reject rate it going up for miners which do not have that my cores.
I am currently using 2x 32 core AWS spot instances for testing throughput, an 8 core i7
and a couple of 3 core virtual machines.
The reject rate for the 32 core monsters is below 1%
Reject rate for the 8 core is below 2%
And the reject rate for the 3 core things is at about 15% !!!
(I have 11 of those, and ALL of them have high reject rates)
I think I can see some pattern in this...
Unfortunately I don't know enough of the underlying work distribution software,
but maybe I am not the only one experiencing this situation and it would be
great if there might be some fine-tuning possible?
Who has the same experience?
-
For me it seems that the reject rate it going up for miners which do not have that my cores.
I am currently using 2x 32 core AWS spot instances for testing throughput, an 8 core i7
and a couple of 3 core virtual machines.
The reject rate for the 32 core monsters is below 1%
Reject rate for the 8 core is below 2%
And the reject rate for the 3 core things is at about 15% !!!
(I have 11 of those, and ALL of them have high reject rates)
I think I can see some pattern in this...
Unfortunately I don't know enough of the underlying work distribution software,
but maybe I am not the only one experiencing this situation and it would be
great if there might be some fine-tuning possible?
Who has the same experience?
I'm having the same observation mate. More cores - less rejections.
-
if this is true it can be a very helpful information actually
@btc2084:
as you see the rejects come in blockwise (ends on "work received"), there's a bug somewhere (in the miner i ---guess---)
this is a known issues, there's a dirty workaround in the latest github (not helpful for windows user i know)
@recci:
protoshares is 1 year ahead of it's schedule... just saying :)
- xolokram
ps. sorry, i dont have much time today for PMs/thread/community/tech support
-
For me it seems that the reject rate it going up for miners which do not have that my cores.
I am currently using 2x 32 core AWS spot instances for testing throughput, an 8 core i7
and a couple of 3 core virtual machines.
The reject rate for the 32 core monsters is below 1%
Reject rate for the 8 core is below 2%
And the reject rate for the 3 core things is at about 15% !!!
(I have 11 of those, and ALL of them have high reject rates)
I think I can see some pattern in this...
Unfortunately I don't know enough of the underlying work distribution software,
but maybe I am not the only one experiencing this situation and it would be
great if there might be some fine-tuning possible?
Who has the same experience?
I'm having the same observation mate. More cores - less rejections.
I would be more interested in the number of rejections vs the percentage. Presumably, a larger number of cores can process a larger number of shares, so if it's a fixed amount of rejects no matter the core number, it would appear to be a smaller percentage with more cores.
-
More orphans. What causes these?
-
@recci:
protoshares is 1 year ahead of it's schedule... just saying :)
- xolokram
Not sure what you mean? Also It turns out I was mining more than I realized. I missed a couple of payouts, turns out I have 0.6 of a PTS :-\
-
More orphans. What causes these?
yes what does this mean 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
TIA
-
More orphans. What causes these?
yes what does this mean 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
TIA
That means we mined that block, but someone else mined a block as a child to the same parent as ours close to the same time, and the network accepted the other child and thus rejected ours. Since our block didn't make it into the final chain, we get nothing for it.
-
I have 494 rejects of 3553 valid shares. Is that number of rejects normal?
-
I have 494 rejects of 3553 valid shares. Is that number of rejects normal?
33 rejects, 5088 valids on a Buffalo, NY server
29 rejects, 2433 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
24 rejects, 1773 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
0 rejects, 158 valids on a Scranton, PA server
2 rejects, 144 valids on a Dallas, TX server
1 reject, 74 valids on a Houston, TX server
42 rejects, 1745 valids on a Germany server
keep in mind that it's mining to a location in new jersey
-
can you two post the # of threads you're using on your servers??
@orphans:
the orphan streak was caused by the stuck protoshares backend like i said before
but the last one is just bad luck, just like Troglodactyl (thank you) said, it's not possible to prevent this completely
on the other hand, if a pool is big enough it could intentionally try to 'orphan' blocks by other pools/users <-- just saying, in theory
- xolokram
-
More orphans. What causes these?
yes what does this mean 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
TIA
That means we mined that block, but someone else mined a block as a child to the same parent as ours close to the same time, and the network accepted the other child and thus rejected ours. Since our block didn't make it into the final chain, we get nothing for it.
or it could be indicative of protoshares client not connected to enough and/or the right peers, or another situation would be a lack of bandwidth and connected to too many peers. in that case, it'd try to send to them all at once and they'd all get it slow.
I received block 28005 and 28039 from a peer in Germany, despite the pool being in New Jersey (and having over 100 connections in protoshare client). I imagine it doesn't have very good connectivity (or not enough peers), or maybe it funnels everything through that Hetzner machine (which wouldnt be so hot with the +120-140ms).
-
can you two post the # of threads you're using on your servers??
@orphans:
the orphan streak was caused by the stuck protoshares backend like i said before
but the last one is just bad luck, just like Troglodactyl (thank you) said, it's not possible to prevent this completely
on the other hand, if a pool is big enough it could intentionally try to 'orphan' blocks by other pools/users <-- just saying, in theory
- xolokram
re: the 3rd one, I don't think it's done intentionally, but, yeah, there's a... uh... slow quark pool that controls about 80-85% of the hashrate and orphans some godawful number of blocks
germany is 7 cores, dallas is 4 cores, houston is 4 cores, the rest are 8 cores
i have some machines running 2 cores here on my home connection that are ~97% valid
ed: in my protoshares log, there's only 1 orphan in the last 6 hour or so and no reorganizations
-
can you two post the # of threads you're using on your servers??
@orphans:
the orphan streak was caused by the stuck protoshares backend like i said before
but the last one is just bad luck, just like Troglodactyl (thank you) said, it's not possible to prevent this completely
on the other hand, if a pool is big enough it could intentionally try to 'orphan' blocks by other pools/users <-- just saying, in theory
- xolokram
2x running 2 threads default memory usage. 1x running 8 threads default memory usage. And 1x using 2 threads with memory option 28.
-
Registered just to report this same issue, large percentage of rejected shares in the last day or two:
Home systems (crashing/rebooting often so the counts are reset often):
4 cores - VL: 255 - RJ: 101
4 cores - VL: 216 - RJ: 48
Hosted server:
8 cores - VL: 29313 - RJ: 3383
-
33 rejects, 5088 valids on a Buffalo, NY server
29 rejects, 2433 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
24 rejects, 1773 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
0 rejects, 158 valids on a Scranton, PA server
2 rejects, 144 valids on a Dallas, TX server
1 reject, 74 valids on a Houston, TX server
42 rejects, 1745 valids on a Germany server
Now it's
92 rejects, 10377 valids on Buffalo, NY server (8 cores)
57 rejects, 5090 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
60 rejects, 4352 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
7 rejects, 1070 valids on Scranton, PA server (*8 cores) -- ed: it just seems like 4 cores. gimp Xeon =(
10 rejects, 1128 valids on Dallas, TX server (4 cores)
5 rejects, 448 valids on Houston, TX server (varies)
69 rejects, 4053 valids on Germany server, (7 cores)
18 rejects, 1494 valids on Lenoir, NC server (8 cores)
these are all using the latest git pull, diff versions of ubuntu, about half on 12.04 and the other half on 13.10
they're also all using the 1024mb memory option
oh, jfyi, that Dallas server is from burst.net... any new customer can get a server for a month for $1 from them, w/ no strings attached (besides having to remember to cancel it in time)
-
What's going on? Why the sudden drop??
28302 2013-12-05 01:51:45 425 / 75638 -> 0.13497 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20 328 / 61573 -> 0.12796 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47 1711 / 285308 -> 0.14405 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28280 2013-12-05 01:03:34 4357 / 701246 -> 0.14925 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
-
@recci:
protoshares is 1 year ahead of it's schedule... just saying :)
- xolokram
Not sure what you mean?
(http://www.taylorclark.co/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/picard.jpg)
-
why so many "ORPHAN" recently?
28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20 30 / 61573 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47 178 / 285308 -> 0.01499 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28280 2013-12-05 01:03:34 475 / 701246 -> 0.01627 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 1034 / 1237920 -> 0.02007 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 425 / 572167 -> 0.01878 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
28190 2013-12-04 20:16:29 170 / 216312 -> 0.01988 PTS / 25.30 PTS -> added
28180 2013-12-04 19:51:11 2270 / 2996040 -> 0.01917 PTS / 25.30 PTS -> PAID
28039 2013-12-04 14:20:19 434 / 696125 -> 0.01577 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
28005 2013-12-04 13:03:07 1545 / 2327564 -> 0.01678 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27891 2013-12-04 08:22:57 234 / 376084 -> 0.01573 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27880 2013-12-04 07:37:27 113 / 189896 -> 0.01505 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27870 2013-12-04 07:15:50 196 / 287681 -> 0.01723 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27854 2013-12-04 06:43:27 105 / 169745 -> 0.01564 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27846 2013-12-04 06:25:00 638 / 976029 -> 0.01653 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27802 2013-12-04 04:32:05 598 / 872171 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27764 2013-12-04 02:39:43 232 / 325316 -> 0.01803 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27749 2013-12-04 01:57:47 314 / 438078 -> 0.01812 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27724 2013-12-04 01:01:13 641 / 744768 -> 0.02176 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27688 2013-12-03 23:22:08 386 / 426659 -> 0.02288 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27670 2013-12-03 22:22:51 795 / 901423 -> 0.02230 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> PAID
27627 2013-12-03 20:15:30 1457 / 1662560 -> 0.02216 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27535 2013-12-03 16:28:34 134 / 134833 -> 0.02514 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27530 2013-12-03 16:09:01 814 / 892905 -> 0.02305 PTS / 25.29 PTS -> added
27488 2013-12-03 13:56:38 76 / 75374 -> 0.02549 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27484 2013-12-03 13:44:20 1526 / 1622710 -> 0.02380 PTS / 25.31 PTS -> added
27380 2013-12-03 09:13:17 238 / 231008 -> 0.02605 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> added
27252 2013-12-03 03:54:09 730 / 419273 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27211 2013-12-03 01:57:52 599 / 356920 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
27170 2013-12-03 00:17:56 870 / 831005 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
-
Hi,
newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?
TIA,
Mike
-
Hi,
newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?
TIA,
Mike
The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.
-
33 rejects, 5088 valids on a Buffalo, NY server
29 rejects, 2433 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
24 rejects, 1773 valids on a Las Vegas, NV server
0 rejects, 158 valids on a Scranton, PA server
2 rejects, 144 valids on a Dallas, TX server
1 reject, 74 valids on a Houston, TX server
42 rejects, 1745 valids on a Germany server
Now it's
92 rejects, 10377 valids on Buffalo, NY server (8 cores)
57 rejects, 5090 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
60 rejects, 4352 valids on Las Vegas, NV server (8 cores)
7 rejects, 1070 valids on Scranton, PA server (*8 cores) -- ed: it just seems like 4 cores. gimp Xeon =(
10 rejects, 1128 valids on Dallas, TX server (4 cores)
5 rejects, 448 valids on Houston, TX server (varies)
69 rejects, 4053 valids on Germany server, (7 cores)
18 rejects, 1494 valids on Lenoir, NC server (8 cores)
these are all using the latest git pull, diff versions of ubuntu, about half on 12.04 and the other half on 13.10
they're also all using the 1024mb memory option
oh, jfyi, that Dallas server is from burst.net... any new customer can get a server for a month for $1 from them, w/ no strings attached (besides having to remember to cancel it in time)
I ran the Windows client for a bit and it started out with 457 accepted and 3 rejects... by the time I saw it to cancel it it was at 677 accepted and 77 rejects.
the linux client disconnects and reconnects if it gets 3 rejects in a row, the windows client doesnt
-
@xrpbtc:
orphans are normal, it's nothing you can prevent 100%
the orphan "streak" was a f---up on the backend of the pool, read the posts about it here
@zvs:
windows binaries are not yet updated, i'll do this later today
the reconnect on rejects is just a (dirty) workaround anyway
i would prefer to find the real origin of the problem and fix that
@MrMeow:
maybe you shouldn't compare rounds with ~60k shares to rounds with 200k+ shares?
- xolokram
-
Hi,
newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?
TIA,
Mike
The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.
thanks for the response :)...i lower the number of my server and rather upgraded on fewer server but with higher CPUs
Mike
-
Hi,
newbie. just wondering, does this apply the more servers you have the more PTS you can mine? or better few servers but higher processors?
TIA,
Mike
The more cores, the more PTS you can mine. Of course those cores should also have a reasonable performance.
Therefore it's depending on core speed (and numbers), not the number of servers.
thanks for the response :)...i lower the number of my server and rather upgraded on fewer server but with higher CPUs
Mike
You may want to have a look at my ptstools (see my signature for web urls) for easier installation and monitoring your servers.
There is also a small puppet manifest available.
-
Hey. uh. xolo... I'm kinda concerned here.
http://imgur.com/RpPPG8z (http://imgur.com/RpPPG8z)
-
@afr33sl4ve:
transaction was successfully executed in block #27991
block id is 000000a68d85c4a81241fa79964bb6bfdca3a407c933a175ff7216aff89e3c12
tx id is b1b0a8e4737b28c46995caaec70d087209a214ec4bfb92375ee273e82237719e
btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?
tldr: check your client/blockchain data, do a rescan (parameter -rescan on your pts client)
-
@xrpbtc:
orphans are normal, it's nothing you can prevent 100%
the orphan "streak" was a f---up on the backend of the pool, read the posts about it here
I am looking at my log and I received all the blocks solved by beeeeer from between 7-10 seconds after it reports them as being found on the website (which means that one or both of our clocks are off but also there shouldn't be a range of 7-10 seconds, shouldn't be greater than 1 second)
but for the one that was orphaned, 28296 2013-12-05 01:43:20, I received:
2013-12-05 01:39:22 received block 0000008c06a5cd9f9d1aa04fff50555e49215efe7a2df6c7fd152f6f7df44348 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:39:22 Committing 91 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:39:22 SetBestChain: new best=0000008c06a5cd9f9d1aa04fff50555e49215efe7a2df6c7fd152f6f7df44348 height=28296 log2_work=37.117473 tx=121129 date=2013-12-05 01:39:16 progress=0.999994
2013-12-05 01:39:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
about 4m earlier.
I guess the node reaction after block #28295 was received is relevant too:
2013-12-05 01:37:22 received block 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 Committing 16 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:37:22 SetBestChain: new best=000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 height=28295 log2_work=37.117204 tx=121100 date=2013-12-05 01:37:11 progress=0.999990
2013-12-05 01:37:22 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks 28294 to 000000232347bda9f9fffe288b67feda9d7cc37651675cecd2533dd4240c3e20 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:37:22 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500 from xxx
all those nodes requesting 28294+, never received 28294 2013-12-05 01:35:47, until I sent it to them after block 28295
the same holds true for block 28303 (after beer got 28302 about 65 seconds earlier):
2013-12-05 01:52:57 received block 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 Committing 40 changed transactions to coin database...
2013-12-05 01:52:57 SetBestChain: new best=00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 height=28303 log2_work=37.119355 tx=121241 date=2013-12-05 01:52:51 progress=0.999994
2013-12-05 01:52:57 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:57 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
2013-12-05 01:52:58 getblocks 28302 to 00000033d992cb9f48c4a53c29e09315bc19674cbcd869d2847530a2604e8859 limit 500 from xxx
so I think protoshare client connectivity is probably an issue here, for some of these
put 5.9.24.81 on addnode :D
-
btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?
There is this other block explorer > http://coinplorer.com/PTS
-
Hi, I have some questions:
My CPU are Xeon E5-2680v2 * 2 (20C40T, HT enabled), I want to use your miner so
1. Which edition settings is best for me? (that is to say, i want to know the different between avx, sse4,intel and sphlib, and which is the fastest)
2. Is Hyper-threading useful for mining?(I can run 40 threads when ht is enabled, and 20 threads when ht is disabled)
-
@xolokram I'm sorry I should've been more specific...
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
My question is why the drop in shares distributed. Does it have to do with the growing complexity? I'm a newb
-
@afr33sl4ve:
transaction was successfully executed in block #27991
block id is 000000a68d85c4a81241fa79964bb6bfdca3a407c933a175ff7216aff89e3c12
tx id is b1b0a8e4737b28c46995caaec70d087209a214ec4bfb92375ee273e82237719e
btsblock is down, does anyone know another public protoshares blockchain explorer?
tldr: check your client/blockchain data, do a rescan (parameter -rescan on your pts client)
Excellent! I type in "-rescan" and it returns method not found. What do?
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!
-
@afr33sl4ve:
you have to start your client with that parameter, it's not a RPC call!!
http://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PuDmCckuUoPe9wvzTwZb9rABukVFSXnseL
@MrMeow:
because you made 7702 / 1237920 and then 3417 / 572167
you're aware of the randomness of cryptocoin mining?
@drmyfore:
AVX (should be enabled) & something between 20 and 40 threads
you'll have to test this as the ram access probably will become a bottleneck
@ryen123:
thank you
- xolokram
-
@xolokram
Well, In fact I have 128GB memory, so I can
1. 40 threads, 2GB per thread (29)
2. 20 threads, 4GB per thread (30)
need I enable sph mode when I use AVX miner?
-
@xolokram:
please dirty-workaround the Windows version! I switched back to your XPM pool until I can get an understanding if PTS mining is not just heating the room. :)
...
@btc2084:
as you see the rejects come in blockwise (ends on "work received"), there's a bug somewhere (in the miner i ---guess---)
this is a known issues, there's a dirty workaround in the latest github (not helpful for windows user i know)
-
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...
-
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...
this is also my problem. But what i did was virtualbox and setup debian...but yes better if we can run on mac
Mike
-
@xolokram I'm sorry I should've been more specific...
28260 2013-12-04 23:45:23 7702 / 1237920 -> 0.14946 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
28212 2013-12-04 21:21:58 3417 / 572167 -> 0.15100 PTS / 25.28 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
My question is why the drop in shares distributed. Does it have to do with the growing complexity? I'm a newb
The block rewards decreases after some (2000+) blocks. Its initial value was 50.
-
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!
I'm also having this issue. Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected. Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind. Then I see my recent payouts. Trying to figure out what's going on.
-
Is there a binary available for OSX Mavericks? I´m unable to compile even though I´ve followed the instructions in this thread...
this is also my problem. But what i did was virtualbox and setup debian...but yes better if we can run on mac
Mike
QT client does not link properly on Mavericks, this issue is inherited from Bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3228
-
hi,
I'm sorry for the late reply. i'm compiling the windows binaries right now, i'll update this (and the first) post when they're uploaded to mediafire
here's the hotfix #3: *CLICK* (http://www.mediafire.com/download/gezxz50ncr90veg/ptsminer_v07b_x64_bundle.zip) (Windows 64Bit Binaries)
containing the 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix :)
@macos:
i dont have a test environment, but let me know if you're able to fix something with the osx makefile.
@drmyfore:
i think you'll have to test the best value for you on your own, as the performance the miner is depending on your cpu & ram
and hypter-threading's additional performance is fluctuating too
- xolokram
-
"no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds"
Just for me? What i am doing wrong?
Using 54.201.26.128:1337
-
For anyone using linux on 32 bits in order to properly compile just replace @
https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt
else (UNIX)
SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf64")
by
else (UNIX)
SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf32")
Test on latest Ubuntu version.
-
running on my vista machine and working great
-
Should I see all of these in my user stats? Should I be getting paid for all of these shares found?
[WORKER] collision found: 49370207 <-> 43324938 #854 @ 1386391677 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:48:08 | 23.6 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 29 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 20094664 <-> 26466244 #876 @ 1386391778 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:49:25 | 23.4 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 30 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 17230700 <-> 66211955 #914 @ 1386391809 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:50:06 | 24.0 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 31 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 42137064 <-> 12638275 #920 @ 1386391822 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-06 22:50:11 | 24.1 c/m | 0.8 sh/m | VL: 32 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
I am just curious because when I used to mine XPM every share found would show up in my stats and I would get paid based on its' value. Now I have 3000 shares and only get paid on 10-20 of them. What gives?
Gilligan~
-
I just had 3 different servers, from 3 different IPs simultaneously start getting rejects a few moments ago. The reconnect feature got things going again, but something's up on the pool end!
-
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!
I'm also having this issue. Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected. Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind. Then I see my recent payouts. Trying to figure out what's going on.
Probably because a lot of the time there aren't any nodes with incoming connections to connect to?... I had a friend that had the same problem, not getting blockchain to update, just told him to addnode 5.9.24.81.
It's at 135/500 connections right now. I have it set for only 20 outbound connections.. but when it does lose one, it still takes up to a hundred or two tries on average to find a new node to connect to.
-
Hi,
Is the hash rate still bugged ?
I don't undestand. It is going faster when I use 1 thread than 48. Explain me please.
Should I use 48 instance of 1 thread instead of 1 instance of 48 thread ?
Thanks
-
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!
I'm also having this issue. Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected. Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind. Then I see my recent payouts. Trying to figure out what's going on.
Probably because a lot of the time there aren't any nodes with incoming connections to connect to?... I had a friend that had the same problem, not getting blockchain to update, just told him to addnode 5.9.24.81.
It's at 135/500 connections right now. I have it set for only 20 outbound connections.. but when it does lose one, it still takes up to a hundred or two tries on average to find a new node to connect to.
Thanks for this - been trying to find a way to get the wallet to play nice all day. Where did you get that node IP from?
-
@xolokram, thanks for the update. Here's the result on my Dell XPS 8700, Intel i7-4770 @ 3.40Ghz w/ 8GB RAM.
Note that I'm not sure the version number is correct for Hotfix#3.
I'm really clueless in the whole "Collision" thing but is it possible that someone is seeing the submission and somehow submitting to a different pool, "stealing" the submission and still somehow getting it in beforehand. Does it seem right that so many are collisions? If I am mining an not getting anything with PTS but collisions shouldn't I switch to another coin?
Thanks for the work Xolo. It does look like this fix corrected the REJECTION issues! :)
C:\Program Files\ptsminer_v0n_x64>ptsminer_avx_intel PtxgdYBcduwpkpcFb564NLKwmswJtcMQcP 8
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using AVX
spawning 8 worker thread(s)
[WORKER[WORKER3] Hello, World!
[WORKER5] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER1] Hello, World!
0] Hello, World!
[WORKER2] Hello, World!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER2[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 37138841 <-> 55733640 #50 @ 1386464732 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:27 | 130.4 c/m | 2.6 sh/m | VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 23022064 <-> 29620132 #64 @ 1386464753 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:33 | 132.4 c/m | 4.1 sh/m | VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 44043751 <-> 40433732 #74 @ 1386464752 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:35 | 143.2 c/m | 5.8 sh/m | VL: 3 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 46794233 <-> 45953484 #102 @ 1386464773 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:46 | 145.7 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 4 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 60679311 <-> 21827609 #112 @ 1386464769 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:48 | 152.7 c/m | 6.8 sh/m | VL: 5 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 11169502 <-> 44658328 #132 @ 1386464788 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:05:57 | 151.7 c/m | 6.8 sh/m | VL: 6 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30973006 <-> 9895520 #150 @ 1386464811 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:06:04 | 150.0 c/m | 7.0 sh/m | VL: 7 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36988808 <-> 11659484 #156 @ 1386464814 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:06:05 | 153.4 c/m | 7.9 sh/m | VL: 8 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 53385407 <-> 50311390 #254 @ 1386464868 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:06:40 | 158.8 c/m | 5.6 sh/m | VL: 9 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65879588 <-> 63916448 #260 @ 1386464870 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:06:42 | 159.2 c/m | 6.1 sh/m | VL: 10 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 7558581 <-> 15603233 #294 @ 1386464901 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:06:55 | 158.9 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 11 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 22462866 <-> 34206375 #318 @ 1386464914 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 19:07:10 | 154.3 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 12 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 41371619 <-> 8658999 #372 @ 1386464871 by 7
hi,
I'm sorry for the late reply. i'm compiling the windows binaries right now, i'll update this (and the first) post when they're uploaded to mediafire
here's the hotfix #3: *CLICK* (http://www.mediafire.com/download/gezxz50ncr90veg/ptsminer_v07b_x64_bundle.zip) (Windows 64Bit Binaries)
containing the 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix :)
...
- xolokram
-
@BTC2084
I think the collisions are a good thing but I am confused on why I have so many collisions that result in shares submitted and only get paid on a few. I am currently running 14 threads and am getting around 5000 collisions per day and only get paid on about 22 per day.
I think it works this way (although I have asked and nobody has responded):
- Each collision results in either a SHARE or a REJECTED response.
- Each SHARE represents your part of a Block or Chain (not sure of the correct terminology)
- You do NOT get paid per SHARE.
- You get paid on multiple SHARE submissions in the same Block or Chain. If I submit 40 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .00156 but if I submit 250 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .0146 for the work that my miners did on that particular Block/Chain.
I am just guessing that this is how it works based on my experience. It seems that as the difficulty has risen (and the value of PTS) the payouts have gotten few and far between. But Xolo's pool is the best by far. The dude is dedicated.
Feel free to correct me on any incorrect assumptions.
Gilligan~
-
@Gilligan
Would be nice if we get credit for submitting even if we have collisions but still it seems like if it were possible to avoid them the pool would make more, right? Thanks for sharing your perspective. I'm trying to understand it still.
I know I am being a bit paranoid when I suggest that so many collisions might be theft but it seems like they started suddenly and in the past not nearly as many occurred.
...
- You get paid on multiple SHARE submissions in the same Block or Chain. If I submit 40 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .00156 but if I submit 250 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .0146 for the work that my miners did on that particular Block/Chain.
I am just guessing that this is how it works ...
Gilligan~
-
@xolokram, is it expected that nearly every stats post should include a "collision found"?
If it is "normal" perhaps the message could be shortened and the unique non-collisions should be shown -?
[WORKER] collision found: 1242542 <-> 40513559 #1000 @ 1386472274 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:24 | 153.1 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 552 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 30604881 <-> 19421341 #1018 @ 1386472288 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:32 | 152.7 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 553 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65629335 <-> 30914487 #1032 @ 1386472289 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:37 | 152.9 c/m | 5.8 sh/m | VL: 554 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 50249271 <-> 53188474 #1054 @ 1386472304 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:45 | 153.1 c/m | 5.8 sh/m | VL: 555 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 32570834 <-> 33910633 #1074 @ 1386472335 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:54 | 152.7 c/m | 5.8 sh/m | VL: 556 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 38802225 <-> 61508252 #1088 @ 1386472328 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:10:57 | 153.6 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 557 (97.5%), RJ: 14 (2.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 17402851 <-> 64986577 #1102 @ 1386472349 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:11:09 | 151.3 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 558 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 1892214 <-> 3952790 #1126 @ 1386472380 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:11:20 | 150.8 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 559 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 22628022 <-> 24608202 #1158 @ 1386472404 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:11:33 | 150.7 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 560 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 8619426 <-> 5349253 #1172 @ 1386472418 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:11:41 | 149.9 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 561 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 22290692 <-> 27419937 #1210 @ 1386472438 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:11:54 | 150.6 c/m | 5.9 sh/m | VL: 562 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 26180219 <-> 54544671 #1256 @ 1386472346 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:12:19 | 148.6 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 563 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 34070194 <-> 33872883 #1272 @ 1386472367 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:12:27 | 148.2 c/m | 5.7 sh/m | VL: 564 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 36833859 <-> 51622397 #1286 @ 1386472365 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:12:30 | 149.0 c/m | 5.8 sh/m | VL: 565 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 07ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 32326278 <-> 36101018 #1342 @ 1386472385 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:13:06 | 145.3 c/m | 5.5 sh/m | VL: 566 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 35712283 <-> 5097742 #1374 @ 1386472407 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:13:16 | 146.2 c/m | 5.5 sh/m | VL: 567 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 9198751 <-> 57142063 #1392 @ 1386472406 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:13:20 | 147.0 c/m | 5.6 sh/m | VL: 568 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 34419075 <-> 49111167 #1512 @ 1386472480 by 0
[WORKER] collision found: 50367191 <-> 32523970 #1514 @ 1386472484 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:14:01 | 149.2 c/m | 5.4 sh/m | VL: 569 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:14:01 | 149.2 c/m | 5.4 sh/m | VL: 570 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 5984402 <-> 58099286 #1520 @ 1386472480 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:14:03 | 149.3 c/m | 5.5 sh/m | VL: 571 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 64570807 <-> 12618303 #1524 @ 1386472480 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-07 21:14:04 | 149.4 c/m | 5.6 sh/m | VL: 572 (97.6%), RJ: 14 (2.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
@BTC2084
I think the collisions are a good thing but I am confused on why I have so many collisions that result in shares submitted and only get paid on a few. I am currently running 14 threads and am getting around 5000 collisions per day and only get paid on about 22 per day.
I think it works this way (although I have asked and nobody has responded):
- Each collision results in either a SHARE or a REJECTED response.
- Each SHARE represents your part of a Block or Chain (not sure of the correct terminology)
- You do NOT get paid per SHARE.
- You get paid on multiple SHARE submissions in the same Block or Chain. If I submit 40 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .00156 but if I submit 250 SHAREs in the same Block/Chain I might get paid .0146 for the work that my miners did on that particular Block/Chain.
I am just guessing that this is how it works based on my experience. It seems that as the difficulty has risen (and the value of PTS) the payouts have gotten few and far between. But Xolo's pool is the best by far. The dude is dedicated.
Feel free to correct me on any incorrect assumptions.
Gilligan~
Gilligan, I think you are confusing shares/minute and collisions/minute. You only get paid for the shares. Collision = COULD BE A SHARE, COULD BE NOTHING. If it prints a new line, it's a share or reject. If you do perhaps 100 collisions per minute, you might get 5 shares per minute. The miner keeps a running tally of the number of shares. Every time a new line is printed that says either Share or reject, it gets added to the tally.
1. Collision - nothing is printed UNLESS... (see 2)
2. If the collision is a share, it prints "collision is found"
3. Same print, next line: "share submitted"
4. If it's a share, prints "SHARE" on the next line
5. If it's a rejected share, prints 'REJECTED" on the next line.
Now, if you're running 14 cores, only having 22 shares a day is laughably low. Figure out what's wrong.
These are my stats, from running my laptop getting ~1 share/minute, plus 20 cores on Azure (doing 250 or so c/m, probably 10+ish shares/min).
29758 2013-12-08 03:31:27 1465 / 1615041 -> 0.02180 PTS / 24.03 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
29706 2013-12-08 00:38:29 1324 / 1453678 -> 0.02188 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
29656 2013-12-07 21:55:48 148 / 177692 -> 0.02000 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
29650 2013-12-07 21:34:19 77 / 79565 -> 0.02324 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
So, over 6 hours, I have about 3000 shares - 500 an hour, 8.25 a minute, roughly.
What CPU, have you checked on your miner to see what it's printing out, etc? I have ~6% rejected on my dual-core laptop, servers are all around 1%, maybe less rejected.
Another thing you could have wrong - did you incorrectly type in your wallet address on any of your miners?
It looks like almost everyone has a ratio ~30 collisions per share. Could be a little more/less. It's not that you're not being paid for 97% of your collisions, you need X amount of collisions (on average) to get a share. Or maybe 30(ish) collisions = 1 share.No way around it, and it's nothing to do with inefficiency. If everyone got 1 collision = 1 share, PTS would've been entirely mined out 2 weeks ago. The whole way cryptography works is, there's a lot of guessing if you don't know how to break the encryption. 99.99999999% of the work done is guesswork, but there's no way around it.
-
@kfuzion
It looks like almost everyone has a ratio ~30 collisions per share. Could be a little more/less. It's not that you're not being paid for 97% of your collisions, you need X amount of collisions (on average) to get a share. Or maybe 30(ish) collisions = 1 share.No way around it, and it's nothing to do with inefficiency. If everyone got 1 collision = 1 share, PTS would've been entirely mined out 2 weeks ago. The whole way cryptography works is, there's a lot of guessing if you don't know how to break the encryption. 99.99999999% of the work done is guesswork, but there's no way around it.
This is what I was trying to say. The ratio is about 30:1. That is all I needed to know. As long as that is how it is for everyone I am good with it.
Thanks for breaking it down for me.
Gilligan~
-
29656 2013-12-07 21:55:48 103 / 177692 -> 0.01392 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29650 2013-12-07 21:34:19 49 / 79565 -> 0.01479 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> PAID
29648 2013-12-07 21:25:26 953 / 1778041 -> 0.01287 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29596 2013-12-07 18:12:58 57 / 79500 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
29591 2013-12-07 18:03:42 46 / 115562 -> 0.00956 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29585 2013-12-07 17:48:27 486 / 813232 -> 0.01435 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29564 2013-12-07 16:17:20 420 / 700573 -> 0.01440 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29544 2013-12-07 15:03:58 60 / 90714 -> 0.01589 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29538 2013-12-07 14:53:16 117 / 212476 -> 0.01323 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29528 2013-12-07 14:28:59 223 / 367670 -> 0.01457 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29520 2013-12-07 13:47:38 221 / 390817 -> 0.01358 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29506 2013-12-07 13:01:07 294 / 530815 -> 0.01330 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29484 2013-12-07 12:01:59 608 / 1028396 -> 0.01420 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29447 2013-12-07 10:04:38 95 / 150580 -> 0.01515 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29441 2013-12-07 09:47:13 53 / 106155 -> 0.01199 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29434 2013-12-07 09:34:27 839 / 1510695 -> 0.01334 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29384 2013-12-07 06:33:13 242 / 388561 -> 0.01496 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29360 2013-12-07 05:44:26 213 / 356817 -> 0.01434 PTS / 24.03 PTS -> PAID
29348 2013-12-07 05:00:34 418 / 620529 -> 0.01618 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29327 2013-12-07 03:44:11 109 / 185814 -> 0.01409 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29317 2013-12-07 03:18:40 541 / 926693 -> 0.01402 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
29288 2013-12-07 01:29:43 373 / 643612 -> 0.01392 PTS / 24.03 PTS -> added
That is the part I don't get.
@BTC2084
Is this your question too?
Looks like 6417 shares to me.
-
So is this:
103 / 177692
The amount of shares submitter per?
-
@zvs: I guess my question is: Why do I get such noisy looking output? For newbs like me, I just want stats coming out of the miner that are meaningful, numbers I can compare with others for performance tuning, and to let me know if there is something wrong with the system. With so many constant "collisions" I have no idea if things are working. It doesn't inspire confidence. The word collision, speaking figuratively, just doesn't sound like a positive thing. So the only thing I know is "something might not be working well here because word "COLLISION" is repeatedly being thrown up on the screen, therefore, perhaps I should be mining something else.
I went back to XPM for a while but the beeeeer.org xpm miner hasn't been respond any more either. :( It sucks but I am considering going back to ypool.
[...]
@BTC2084
Is this your question too?
Looks like 6417 shares to me.
-
EDIT: FIXED!
Restart of the wallet fixed the problem, the payment was received immediatley, this may go to the FAQ too :)
Hello,
I reached the payout minimum of 0.2
29384 2013-12-07 06:33:13 155 / 388561 -> 0.00958 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> PAID
I sow this in the first post "your payout will be executed, when blocks are confirmed (delay of 120 blocks) and you reach 0.2 PTS"
I also get paid (in my account in beeeer) for
29706 2013-12-08 00:38:29 273 / 1453678 -> 0.00451 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
which shows that more than 300 blocks have already passed since the PAID one.
But the payment is still not received in my wallet.
THe address match perfectly , I checked like 12 times.
My user is PqP7P1mpytqAA7gPT7TGiMM4Amo3H7aKsu
-
Am I the only one having issues compiling PTSMiner on a Debian 6 system perhaps? It's a KVM virtual machine.
Error below =
make -f makefile.unix
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libboost_system.so.1.54.0, needed by /usr/local/lib/libboost_filesystem.so, may conflict with libboost_system.so.1.42.0
obj/main_poolminer.o: In function `void boost::this_thread::sleep<boost::posix_time::seconds>(boost::posix_time::seconds const&)':
main_poolminer.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost11this_thread5sleepINS_10posix_time7secondsEEEvRKT_[void boost::this_thread::sleep<boost::posix_time::seconds>(boost::posix_time::seconds const&)]+0x2e0): undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::hiden::sleep_until(timespec const&)'
obj/main_poolminer.o: In function `CMasterThread::run()':
main_poolminer.cpp:(.text._ZN13CMasterThread3runEv[CMasterThread::run()]+0x15b): undefined reference to `boost::thread::start_thread_noexcept()'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
------
Everything necessary for the compile is installed afaik, as I've tried re-doing it aswell.
-
Thanks for posting this, I had the same problem and the restart of the PTS wallet has fixed it.
On the other hand, it raises the question with the PTS wallet itself. Why is it showing the green check mark "synchronized" when in fact it is not.
PS Later I'm thinking it might have something to do with the fact that I changed my wireless connection earlier yesterday. Other coin wallets were also showing they were synchronized when in fact they were not.
EDIT: FIXED!
Restart of the wallet fixed the problem, the payment was received immediatley, this may go to the FAQ too :)
Hello,
I reached the payout minimum of 0.2
29384 2013-12-07 06:33:13 155 / 388561 -> 0.00958 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> PAID
I sow this in the first post "your payout will be executed, when blocks are confirmed (delay of 120 blocks) and you reach 0.2 PTS"
I also get paid (in my account in beeeer) for
29706 2013-12-08 00:38:29 273 / 1453678 -> 0.00451 PTS / 24.02 PTS -> added
which shows that more than 300 blocks have already passed since the PAID one.
But the payment is still not received in my wallet.
THe address match perfectly , I checked like 12 times.
My user is PqP7P1mpytqAA7gPT7TGiMM4Amo3H7aKsu
-
I have 4 computers, may I use the same wallet to mine together(no workers for beeeeer pool )?
They use same ip(WLAN), won't conflict?
-
sorry, for the rare posts, i'm currently focusing on upgrading the primecoin pool/webpage/stats etc.pp.
as i was focusing on pts too much the last couple of weeks (the todos were piling up :) )
@zzz111:
it's ok, you can do that.
@Gilligan:
per round
a round (to find a block) takes usually several thousands shares
this is your portion of this specific round
beeeer's pts pool is paying you proportional on a block/round (not like the XPM pool, where you're paid per share)
- xolokram
-
It would be helpful for new people working under linux to have the following instruction stated in first post:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install yasm -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev
sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
-
After having trust issues with pts.rpool.net, i decided to switch back to b(e-5)r.
Just coming home from dropping my girlfriend to the airport and I found the 3 computers that i had started to mine there where showing between 12% and 20% Rejected shares. WTF
I had the new Update #3 software that is on listed on their site running. Is there something I should know about? 20% of the work the computers are doing rejected?
If it is a client issues, I would love to hear about a solution or a hint what I could do to bring down the REJECTED% Rate...
Albi
-
Only 20%? Seems like 95% of my machine's work gets COLLISION. I'm giving up and switching back to xolominer / primecoin.
After having trust issues with pts.rpool.net, i decided to switch back to b(e-5)r.
Just coming home from dropping my girlfriend to the airport and I found the 3 computers that i had started to mine there where showing between 12% and 20% Rejected shares. WTF
I had the new Update #3 software that is on listed on their site running. Is there something I should know about? 20% of the work the computers are doing rejected?
If it is a client issues, I would love to hear about a solution or a hint what I could do to bring down the REJECTED% Rate...
Albi
-
It would be helpful for new people working under linux to have the following instruction stated in first post:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install yasm -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev
sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
Yeah, I worked that out myself... Are you sure you need the dos2unix and libssl-dev though? I can compile fine without those two.
-
libminiupnp is not needed too
@btc2084(+aleiprecht):
95% collisions? or rejects?
can you send me a log excerpt from your miners showing a few lines before and after rejected shares via PM?
- xolokram
ps. is one of you guys this address: Pg[...]BNWVJ ???
pps. i've decreased the share target
-
Hey I've been mining on your pool with the 8CPU/16GB from DigitalOcean for a few hours and this is what I've gotten: http://i.imgur.com/lImsrwY.png
Whats up with this mining? I'm making around the same amount of PTS that I did on my home PC with better stats.
-
look at the timestamps
your proportion on a round is higher than before
-
Yes higher but not by much. When coyotepool was running, right before it was closed, I was making the same amount I have all together with your pool in half a day with 3x less the power I'm mining with now. I mine LTC at this same speed...
-
so are you comparing your hardware setups, software or (totally different) coins?
or all together?
all i see (from your screenshot):
you've recently made 0.00941 PTS in 6 hours
before that you've made 0.00965 PTS in 21 hours
i would call that an improvement :o
- xolokram
/edit: ok, i see there are quite huge gaps in your stats so i guess you're not mining 24hours a day
what is your miner configuration for these two hardware setups???
-
Someone kept closing my miner before since it was on my home computer, which is why there's time gaps. I'm just saying with the exact same hardware/software, I can mine the same amount of LTC (higher difficulty) as I do here with PTS. All I want to do is mine another 8 PTS before the 24th so I can get myself a founders ID.
I'm more than sure I should be mining more than 0.00733 PTS in a few hours with 16GB RAM and 8CPU's from the cloud mining tutorial link you provided on the pool website.
EDIT: I followed this tutorial for the cloud mining a few hours ago https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=722.0 and started with the 16Gb RAM and 8 CPU's, running 12 threads.
And for my home PC I was running 8GB ram at 7 threads.
-
LTC != PTS
fyi the pool is making around 550-800* PTS per day with >5000 miners
- xolokram
* = highly depending on randomness (aka luck) <-- this also applies to every single miner**
** = and miner configuration
-
I hear that its possible to mine pts with GPU's now? Could we not get one of those up and running for the pool? Would be good to get all 4 cores and the gpu blazing away...
-
gpu miner for LTC, QRK, XPM, PTS.. but i can not run it:(
[POSSIBLE SCAM]anonymousdelivers.us/94070
-
@realtailer:
REMOVE THAT LINK FROM THIS THREAD NOW!!
if you want to 'promote' anything, create your own thread!
@testz:
can you remove the link from your post, please?
-
please use the report to moderator link next time, so I could react faster
-
EDIT: Nevermind. Reopened the wallet client. Turns out the block chain wasn't updating at all. :\ The transaction is there. :D Thanks again!
I'm also having this issue. Eventually the wallet client stops updating even though it still says its connected. Nothing updates, but everything looks fine and says that's it's connected to the network, until I restart it and find that I'm X number of hours behind. Then I see my recent payouts. Trying to figure out what's going on.
Probably because a lot of the time there aren't any nodes with incoming connections to connect to?... I had a friend that had the same problem, not getting blockchain to update, just told him to addnode 5.9.24.81.
It's at 135/500 connections right now. I have it set for only 20 outbound connections.. but when it does lose one, it still takes up to a hundred or two tries on average to find a new node to connect to.
Thanks for this - been trying to find a way to get the wallet to play nice all day. Where did you get that node IP from?
Ah, just now saw the post. 5.9.24.81 is my Hetzner machine. I used to enjoy filling up the 'hub nodes' list on blockchain.info, but it also caused a lot of problems (people thinking I have lots of bitcoins cause I'm #1 on the list, people thinking I stole their bitcoins cause my IP showed on their transaction, people DDoS'ing me for whatever reason, etc) so I finally repurposed it about 2 weeks ago. It was on quarks, now it's on protoshares.
.. and it uses the amazing chuck norris subclient
-
In the last 24 hours I've had a sudden drop of performance. My main miner is an i7-4770K and is only processing 1.5 shares a minute. Yesterday it was doing around 4 shares a minute. Has there been an increase in difficulty or something like that can explain it?
[STATS] 2013-Dec-10 15:41:45 | 130.1 c/m | 1.5 sh/m | VL: 16 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
In the last 24 hours I've had a sudden drop of performance. My main miner is an i7-4770K and is only processing 1.5 shares a minute. Yesterday it was doing around 4 shares a minute. Has there been an increase in difficulty or something like that can explain it?
[STATS] 2013-Dec-10 15:41:45 | 130.1 c/m | 1.5 sh/m | VL: 16 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
yes share target went from 07ffff or somesuch to 03fffff
-
pps. i've decreased the share target
sh/m is not important for your "performance"
col/m is (and shouldn't be affected by the share target)
-
But we are paid by the sh/m, aren't we? Or maybe I'm confused?
-
proportional, if all miners submit 80% of the shares on share target 3fff.. than on share target 7fff.. than your payout is the same
-
Setting up the x64 on another machine, but it is unable to connect, is there something I need to add to the .bat file?
-
Hi all,
Looking for your help. Each time I try to open ptsminer (v05 or v07) it closes immediately. This happens both before and after I have edited the "EDIT-ME" bat file.
Any suggestions? Has anyone encountered this problem.
Thanks in advance
-
@gabbo+nitrominer:
what about showing us your .bat content?
ps. (very) small server downtime incoming due to some maintenance
-
@gabbo+nitrominer:
what about showing us your .bat content?
ps. (very) small server downtime incoming due to some maintenance
ptsminer_intel.exe PtR7iWBNsT1KzujorWt6Cq7tet4XeJ6m2L 3 27 sph
-
could you tell me the difference between c/m and sh/m?
My computer are 491 c/m 7.7 sh/m (it seemed that sh/m is in slow)
How to calc 24h/1d can miner how many pts?
-
@nitrominer:
that looks fine, do you get any error message or output from the miner?
/edit: i can connect from my place with your .bat, just tested it
@drmyfore:
collision / minute <-- the actual work that's done to find a protoshares block (aka your performance, compare this to others)
shares / minute <-- the # of shares you're submitting, this is also depending on the server config (aka sharetarget, this is not a good measure to compare)
SMALL POOL MAINTENANCE INCOMING *done*
-
This is all it does for me:
C:\Users\admin\Downloads\ptsminer_v07a_x64_bundle_newer>ptsminer_intel.exe PtR7i
WBNsT1KzujorWt6Cq7tet4XeJ6m2L 3 27 sph
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SPHLIB
spawning 3 worker thread(s)
[WORKER[WORKER2] Hello, World![WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!1] Hello, World!
[WORKER
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
2] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:10060
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:10060
-
system:10060 = timeout for connection
but the pool is definetely running and connectable
something's blocking your connection
(except you were "lucky" and tested your connection while i was working on the pool software for ~3 minutes...)
-
system:10060 = timeout for connection
but the pool is definetely running and connectable
something's blocking your connection
(except you were "lucky" and tested your connection while i was working on the pool software for ~3 minutes...)
Is there another pool or port that I could add, it may be something in my network that I don't have access to change. I was mining with the protoshare wallet earlier on this machine and it was working OK with the following added to it: -connect=168.63.12.227:80
Can I add that in the edit file?
-
system:10060 = timeout for connection
but the pool is definetely running and connectable
something's blocking your connection
(except you were "lucky" and tested your connection while i was working on the pool software for ~3 minutes...)
Having the same issue on 2 machines at physically different places. I also can't ping the server.
-
this is using the wallet mining from protoshares:
18:20:33

getmininginfo
18:20:33

{
"blocks" : 31365,
"currentblocksize" : 11795,
"currentblocktx" : 25,
"difficulty" : 0.00647256,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 3,
"collisionspermin" : 0.00000000,
"pooledtx" : 25,
"testnet" : false
}
I don't see a hashrate?
-
system:10060 = timeout for connection
but the pool is definetely running and connectable
something's blocking your connection
(except you were "lucky" and tested your connection while i was working on the pool software for ~3 minutes...)
Having the same issue on 2 machines at physically different places. I also can't ping the server.
Same problem for me using v0.7RC3 just kick me out using this bat.
ptsminer_sse4.exe Ptc5F6gWdDfRiGNtSy4jGc6QwgDtF4x8nb 8 26
Have had to revert back to RC2 which works fine.
-
Payouts appear to have stopped after this last orphan. Is it just me or is there something going on?
31467 2013-12-11 03:43:14 14 / 100638 -> 0.00317 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31459 2013-12-11 03:26:05 363 / 1099556 -> 0.00753 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31399 2013-12-11 00:38:27 115 / 361649 -> 0.00726 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31373 2013-12-10 23:41:50 91 / 245485 -> 0.00846 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31357 2013-12-10 23:04:15 5 / 13440 -> 0.00849 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31355 2013-12-10 23:01:24 166 / 495769 -> 0.00764 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31269 2013-12-10 19:50:03 56 / 172592 -> 0.00740 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31262 2013-12-10 19:26:07 64 / 215624 -> 0.00677 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31249 2013-12-10 18:56:44 4 / 12155 -> 0.00751 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31246 2013-12-10 18:54:07 168 / 495848 -> 0.00773 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31223 2013-12-10 17:54:02 609 / 2217644 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
31125 2013-12-10 13:27:57 43 / 217822 -> 0.00450 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31114 2013-12-10 13:01:38 12 / 43695 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
-
Payouts appear to have stopped after this last orphan. Is it just me or is there something going on?
31467 2013-12-11 03:43:14 14 / 100638 -> 0.00317 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31459 2013-12-11 03:26:05 363 / 1099556 -> 0.00753 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31399 2013-12-11 00:38:27 115 / 361649 -> 0.00726 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31373 2013-12-10 23:41:50 91 / 245485 -> 0.00846 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31357 2013-12-10 23:04:15 5 / 13440 -> 0.00849 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31355 2013-12-10 23:01:24 166 / 495769 -> 0.00764 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31269 2013-12-10 19:50:03 56 / 172592 -> 0.00740 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31262 2013-12-10 19:26:07 64 / 215624 -> 0.00677 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31249 2013-12-10 18:56:44 4 / 12155 -> 0.00751 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31246 2013-12-10 18:54:07 168 / 495848 -> 0.00773 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31223 2013-12-10 17:54:02 609 / 2217644 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
31125 2013-12-10 13:27:57 43 / 217822 -> 0.00450 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31114 2013-12-10 13:01:38 12 / 43695 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
+1...
31512 2013-12-11 05:24:20 23 / 567821 -> 0.00092 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31469 2013-12-11 03:50:46 4 / 38844 -> 0.00235 PTS / 22.83 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31467 2013-12-11 03:43:14 6 / 100638 -> 0.00136 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31459 2013-12-11 03:26:05 96 / 1099556 -> 0.00199 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31399 2013-12-11 00:38:27 18 / 361649 -> 0.00114 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31373 2013-12-10 23:41:50 19 / 245485 -> 0.00177 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31357 2013-12-10 23:04:15 1 / 13440 -> 0.00170 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31355 2013-12-10 23:01:24 21 / 495769 -> 0.00097 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31269 2013-12-10 19:50:03 11 / 172592 -> 0.00145 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31262 2013-12-10 19:26:07 16 / 215624 -> 0.00169 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31247 2013-12-10 18:54:48 1 / 3840 -> 0.00594 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31246 2013-12-10 18:54:07 31 / 495848 -> 0.00143 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
31223 2013-12-10 17:54:02 127 / 2217644 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
31125 2013-12-10 13:27:57 8 / 217822 -> 0.00084 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
-
Same for me. No block confirmation for the last ~ 14 hours or so.
Hopefully this does not trigger a new chain of orphans... :(
-
sorry, i forgot to activate the cronjobs again after the small maintenance yesterday evening
the 'missing' payouts should be executed within the next minutes
:slap:
:o
-
Thanks.
I have a noob question:
Can anyone explain me the differences between the executables:
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe
ptsminer_intel.exe
ptsminer_sse4.exe
And the parameters:
-avx
-sse4
-sph
I have one i7 2600k@3.40GHz (8 threads) and one Xeon (12 threads). Which setting is better for my rigs? I've done some test mixing things, but I can't notice the differences.
Thank you.
-
Thanks.
I have a noob question:
Can anyone explain me the differences between the executables:
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe
ptsminer_intel.exe
ptsminer_sse4.exe
And the parameters:
-avx
-sse4
-sph
I have one i7 2600k@3.40GHz (8 threads) and one Xeon (12 threads). Which setting is better for my rigs? I've done some test mixing things, but I can't notice the differences.
Thank you.
cat /proc/cpuinfo or use cpu-id to see if they have avx or sse4.
well, i can tell you the i7 2600 has avx & sse4, unsure about whatever xeon that is. since it's a hexacore i think it also has avx (all the hexacore xeons do dont they?)
avx is better, theoretically. i dont notice much diff between avx and sse4, either. the diff between avx/sse4 and sph should be noticeable though, maybe over a longer period of time
some machines are more suited to something like quark, eg dual core Xeon L5420 which will max out at around 100 collisions on ptsminer vs 650khash/s on minerd... 1240v3 will get around 800khash/s but 170-180'ish collisions
-
@xolokram: Might you be able to compile a "fat" binary and have the code just test to see what capabilities are available, and then have it run the right code? That would be soooo much easier for users to get the best results, wouldn't it?
I have the same problem - I really have no idea what to use.
I found the wikipedia article that shows the following so I just assumed AVX is the best thing to run if my processor works with it. But it sure would be grand if the app would choose for us.
"AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) is an advanced version of SSE announced by Intel featuring a widened data path from 128 bits to 256 bits and 3-operand instructions (up from 2). Intel released processors in early 2011 with AVX support.[4] AVX requires support from the operating system. AVX cannot be used on older operating systems like Windows XP or Windows Vista, even if the CPU supports AVX." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_SIMD_Extensions
... differences between the executables:
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe
ptsminer_intel.exe
ptsminer_sse4.exe
And the parameters:
-avx
-sse4
-sph
...
Thank you.
-
sorry, i forgot to activate the cronjobs again after the small maintenance yesterday evening
the 'missing' payouts should be executed within the next minutes
:slap:
:o
Thanks Xolo but now I see a paid but have not received payment:
31373 2013-12-10 23:41:50 91 / 245485 -> 0 PTS / 0 PTS -> ORPHAN :(
31357 2013-12-10 23:04:15 5 / 13440 -> 0.00849 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31355 2013-12-10 23:01:24 166 / 495769 -> 0.00764 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31269 2013-12-10 19:50:03 56 / 172592 -> 0.00740 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> PAID
31262 2013-12-10 19:26:07 64 / 215624 -> 0.00677 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31249 2013-12-10 18:56:44 4 / 12155 -> 0.00751 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
31246 2013-12-10 18:54:07 168 / 495848 -> 0.00773 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added31223
It seems to have been about 9 hours now since your fixed the issue. Curious if it is just me.
Nevermind, I restarted my wallet and the payout showed up.
Thanks Xolo
-
Anyone using AMD Opteron (6164HE) ?
What are the best setting you found ?
Any advice on AMD processor ?
About the RAM, does the clockrate make a difference for you ?
Thanks
EDIT :
More ram is better only if the ram is fast enough.
-
Thanks.
I have a noob question:
Can anyone explain me the differences between the executables:
ptsminer_avx_intel.exe
ptsminer_intel.exe
ptsminer_sse4.exe
And the parameters:
-avx
-sse4
-sph
I have one i7 2600k@3.40GHz (8 threads) and one Xeon (12 threads). Which setting is better for my rigs? I've done some test mixing things, but I can't notice the differences.
Thank you.
cat /proc/cpuinfo or use cpu-id to see if they have avx or sse4.
well, i can tell you the i7 2600 has avx & sse4, unsure about whatever xeon that is. since it's a hexacore i think it also has avx (all the hexacore xeons do dont they?)
avx is better, theoretically. i dont notice much diff between avx and sse4, either. the diff between avx/sse4 and sph should be noticeable though, maybe over a longer period of time
some machines are more suited to something like quark, eg dual core Xeon L5420 which will max out at around 100 collisions on ptsminer vs 650khash/s on minerd... 1240v3 will get around 800khash/s but 170-180'ish collisions
Thanks for the reply.
The cpus have avx, so I use that version.
Last question about ram influence on mining results. Is it better to use maximum amount? It's obvious to me.. but better asking :D
-
Last question about ram influence on mining results. Is it better to use maximum amount? It's obvious to me.. but better asking :D
For me not too much difference.
-
@btc2084:
it would be possible to do this (one big file with all optimized code), but this is really difficult & complex, introducing more bugs/problems which i want to avoid atm as there's enough to do.
if you have a modern cpu you should use the avx version and it --should-- also activate avx on its own.
if you're unsure about your cpu then use the sse4 version and it --should-- also activate sse4 on its own, otherwise it will fallback (just like the avx version) to sphlib.
if you encounter multiple random crashs, then your cpu is not suitable for avx and sse4 at all (aka your cpu is old), then you should use the sph version.
@Harvester:
you should use the default of the ram usage parameter. if you're feeling lucky (aka you have very fast ram/cpu) and have enough ram then you can increase it. if you dont have enough ram, decrease it. but maxing it out with even more ram, just because you have enough ram is not very useful as the ram with rapidly become your new bottleneck for the computation.
@zvs:
thank you.
- xolokram
-
Last question about ram influence on mining results. Is it better to use maximum amount? It's obvious to me.. but better asking :D
I've actually got lower performance by using the 1024mb option over the 512mb option. No idea why - there doesn't seem to be any clear correlation to me..
-
bottleneck for the computation
your ram/cpu is not fast enough, it's nothing unusual
-
Looks like I can't connect to 54.201.26.128 at this location. Any work around for this?
-
Looks like I can't connect to 54.201.26.128 at this location. Any work around for this?
54.201.26.128 doesn't respond to pings at my location, either. Odd, because it's definitely up (miners are connecting and getting/submitting work off-site at current). Likeliness is the system the pool is sat on is just setup to reject ICMP echo requests and rather not that the server is down.
Have you tried running a miner against it, or is it just not responding to a standard ping?
-
you cannot ping the servers
-
With my standard bat file setup just like I have on my home PC, it doesn't connect and won't mine. I opened everything up on my local firewall but I am not sure if the location I am at is blocking that port (router settings, etc), that activity, or what-not.
I had to put a flag on the wallet app to get it to connect to a node by adding it to the run command, it mined all night, supposedly, but it actually didn't do anything. Very weird. When I checked on it this morning, it had a runtime error saying it asked it to shutdown in an odd manner. I checked the log file, it didn't have a hashrate.
I really want to set up this x64 miner but the damn thing won't connect still, no matter what I do.
-
how to run on linux
I have to type in the command line?
-
how to run on linux
I have to type in the command line?
Try this:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg13771#msg13771
-
hi, i used this miner (jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h) with ypool.net -> ~200c/m
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
when i used ptsminer_v07b_x64 in this topic with ptsweb.beeeeer.org -> ~170c/m.
I tried to configure jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h with ptsweb.beeeeer.org, but i got the message " can't connect to "
anyone know how to make jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h work with beeeeeer.org ?
-
it's not possible to use jhprotominer at beeeeer's pool atm due to different communication protocols
i plan to support it, until then you'll have to stick to beeeeer's ptsminer
- xolokram
-
HI,xolokram.
pls help me ,v0.5a how to set proxy mining?
thanks!
HI,xolokram.
I hope to set proxy mining, too.
Do you plan to implement it?
-
actually i'll try to switch to the 'getblocktemplate' protocol completely
that means proxy & jhProtominer (afaik) should be possible without problems
(i shouldn't use the words "without problems" for upcoming features :D )
- xolokram
-
hi, i used this miner (jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h) with ypool.net -> ~200c/m
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
when i used ptsminer_v07b_x64 in this topic with ptsweb.beeeeer.org -> ~170c/m.
I tried to configure jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h with ptsweb.beeeeer.org, but i got the message " can't connect to "
anyone know how to make jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h work with beeeeeer.org ?
I too use jhprotominer at ypool but I find beeeer.org finds a lot more shares and the block yield is a lot higher here too. About twice as much.
-
hi, i used this miner (jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h) with ypool.net -> ~200c/m
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
when i used ptsminer_v07b_x64 in this topic with ptsweb.beeeeer.org -> ~170c/m.
I tried to configure jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h with ptsweb.beeeeer.org, but i got the message " can't connect to "
anyone know how to make jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h work with beeeeeer.org ?
I too use jhprotominer at ypool but I find beeeer.org finds a lot more shares and the block yield is a lot higher here too. About twice as much.
It is possible that the two miners have different calculation of the collisions. What matter is how much ProtoShares you get in 24 hours.
-
Last question about ram influence on mining results. Is it better to use maximum amount? It's obvious to me.. but better asking :D
I've actually got lower performance by using the 1024mb option over the 512mb option. No idea why - there doesn't seem to be any clear correlation to me..
It is because you are above your max RAM amount so your system is using cache to balance.
-
What does this sentence mean ?
the memory access will be your bottleneck
I see this everywhere but it doesn't make sense to me. What is the unit of memory access, where do you find that information ?
-
doesn't make sense to mejust like your last 3 posts to me, do you even take your time to read what i'm writing?
@"different calculation of the collisions":
like i already wrote, they use different communication protocols...
@"cache to balance":
there's no point in any caches if the amount of used ram is far too much to check/build/set/move/erase with every iteration of protoshares' mining calculation
and that's what i mean by bottleneck
-
Hello, All!
Is the pool down?
c:\U\Ptsminer_32bit>ptsminer_32bit.exe AYoEmYQXn89umjaMZgwyHMYVS6Nk4kngwg 11
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.5 RC1 <experimental> HOTFIX-1
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
*** thanks to jh00, testix & Co.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
spawning 11 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER2] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER9] Hello, World!
[WORKER9] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] Hello, World!
[WORKER8] Hello, World!
[WORKER10] Hello, World!
[WORKER2] GoGoGo!
[WORKER8] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] Hello, World!
[WORKER10] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
-
use a protoshares address, not a primecoin address
-
doesn't make sense to mejust like your last 3 posts to me, do you even take your time to read what i'm writing?
Yes but it doesn't mean I understand everything.
@"different calculation of the collisions":
like i already wrote, they use different communication protocols...
So we agree, what's the problem ?
@"cache to balance":
there's no point in any caches if the amount of used ram is far too much to check/build/set/move/erase with every iteration of protoshares' mining calculation
and that's what i mean by bottleneck
Ok thanks.
-
I've been having a problem with sources compiled from github. I have successfully built it on 6 Debian 7 64-bit machines. I'm trying an Ubuntu 13.10 laptop now
$ uname -a
Linux maqifrnswa1 3.11.0-14-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 12 17:07:40 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz with avx sse4
When I run:
$ ./ptsminer Pn5cHQPYxzJAso16hpvCCSjj7HEnuccJbs 1 27 avx
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using AVX
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 12 <-> 20 #26 @ 1386879675 by 0
[WORKER] collision found: 31 <-> 23 #48 @ 1386879675 by 0
...
{SNIP SEVERAL HUNDRED COLLISIONS}
...
[WORKER] collision found: 15604 <-> 15596 #31194 @ 1386879675 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 15:21:15 | 937440.0 c/m | 13680.0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 1 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 15:21:15 | 938160.0 c/m | 13680.0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 2 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
too many rejects (3) in a row, forcing reconnect.
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 15:21:15 | 938700.0 c/m | 13680.0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 3 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
sse4 does the same thing. sph doesn't seem to do anything at all. This is a 64 bit processor but I'm running a 32bit kernel, don't know if that helps anything.
-
Hi
Just realised I'd posted this in the wrong thread elsewhere...
In short, I've got it up and running on my i7, it's been running for a couple of hours, looks to be working as expected, seeing shares (1.6 per minute, apparently), and they are being submitted:
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 18940878 <-> 44909807 #7154 @ 1386881561 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:52:51 | 101.8 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 110 (97.3%), RJ: 3 (2.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 31333721 <-> 62623656 #7166 @ 1386881562 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:53:03 | 101.7 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 110 (96.5%), RJ: 4 (3.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 22889228 <-> 6295588 #7206 @ 1386881609 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:53:24 | 101.8 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 111 (96.5%), RJ: 4 (3.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 54390359 <-> 8144277 #7286 @ 1386881662 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:54:04 | 101.9 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 112 (96.6%), RJ: 4 (3.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 31047563 <-> 17602610 #7346 @ 1386881731 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:54:43 | 101.9 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 113 (96.6%), RJ: 4 (3.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 28908288 <-> 18051481 #7372 @ 1386881757 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-12 20:54:54 | 101.9 c/m | 1.6 sh/m | VL: 114 (96.6%), RJ: 4 (3.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 33726286 <-> 47337434 #7530 @ 1386881890 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
So it looks like it's working? (these are the only two rejecteds I've seen, just thought I'd put them in for good measure)
But when I go to the address to check if I've got anything:
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pq3v5ag52s5KKSgne44YeuPf7Yae1G2bSQ
I see a balance of 0. Should I see a small balance with a lot of leading zeroes (such as 0.000001) yet?
I've been mining with cgminer and bfgminer successfully with "standard" pools, but been trying lately to do something with the CPU on my machine as well, and it mostly seems to be currencies where you don't have an 'account' as such, and don't have a nice web front end (such as coinotron, btcguild), and I've not really had a lot of luck; on beeeeer.org I've got XPM working OK, but wanted to get pts on the go as well. Any help is appreciated.
Darren
-
the balance is based on confirmed (and valid) blocks
-
OK, is there an ETA for that? I thought it was a 5 minute block target? How many decimal places will the readout go to?
Sorry, just don't want to leave it on for two days only to find that I've done something stupid. As I say, the XPM miner is working fine on the beeeeer pool, and I have BTC and LTC mining going on here as well on other machines... so I'm not a complete donut. But maybe half one!
-
protoshares' blocks need 120 subsequent blocks to be confirmed
-
I've been mining for a while, actual confirmations times can vary by a lot. Just need a little patience :)
current balance: 0.14874 PTS
32369 2013-12-12 20:56:51 3665 / 1867798 -> 0.04254 PTS / 21.68 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
32311 2013-12-12 16:34:02 824 / 491601 -> 0.03634 PTS / 21.68 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
32301 2013-12-12 15:27:28 1106 / 811930 -> 0.02958 PTS / 21.71 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
32290 2013-12-12 13:39:22 3497 / 2234297 -> 0.03399 PTS / 21.71 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations (88 confirms as I'm posting this)
32191 2013-12-12 08:13:55 112 / 62028 -> 0.04120 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
32184 2013-12-12 08:04:11 1790 / 776276 -> 0.05262 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
32133 2013-12-12 05:51:42 392 / 163144 -> 0.05492 PTS / 22.86 PTS -> added
32120 2013-12-12 05:22:34 189 / 73172 -> 0.05894 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> PAID
32113 2013-12-12 05:08:59 385 / 183993 -> 0.04775 PTS / 22.82 PTS -> added
-
Last question about ram influence on mining results. Is it better to use maximum amount? It's obvious to me.. but better asking :D
I've actually got lower performance by using the 1024mb option over the 512mb option. No idea why - there doesn't seem to be any clear correlation to me..
It is because you are above your max RAM amount so your system is using cache to balance.
Sorry, I don't think so - I have a dual core (2 core) system with 8GB of RAM. If I were to use the 512mb option, approximately 1024mb of RAM would be used by the miner. If I were to use the 1024mb option, approximately 2048mb were to be used by the miner. 2048mb is nowhere near the 8192mb of total RAM in my system, so the reason for my performance decrease is not that my system is using page/swap. :)
-
Hi,
http://postimg.org/image/3ssixf76x/
current balance: 0 PTS, when received ?
-
Hi,
http://postimg.org/image/3ssixf76x/
current balance: 0 PTS, when received ?
When the block you are working on gets found, you will receive a payout. It will be a percentage of the total block value, defined by how many shares you have mined. Blocks can take anywhere between 10 minutes and 4 hours to be found - your balance will be updated then.
-
Okay, i understand, but 8-10 shares. and page is empty only write balance 0. i do not understand...
-
As said to me, just wait for a bit. I did 3-4 hours mining yesterday evening, and the balance didn't start showing up on my page until I had a look this morning (UK time). Not sure what the lag was, but it was certainly over 6 hours between me starting and seeing anything. Mining I've done this afternoon has already started to show up, so there is clearly some variance.
-
The page only is updated after a block is found by the pool. It can take several hours for that to happen.
-
The page only is updated after a block is found by the pool. It can take several hours for that to happen.
Exactly this.
Sometimes it can take literally minutes for the balance to update (a new block to be found). Sometimes it can take upwards of 6 hours. As with a lot of cryptocurrency mining - luck of the draw :P And patience!
-
Guys,
anyone tried to mine using beeeer.org pool using this specs
Dual Quad Core Server Xeon E5620 2.4GHz
16GB RAM
500GB Storage
10TB Bandwidth
average PTS mine per day with the said specs?
TIA,
Mike
-
For those reading my previous posts, testing with telnet using other ports showed that something in my network infrastructure is blocking my connection to their IP with port 1337.
-
Guys,
anyone tried to mine using beeeer.org pool using this specs
Dual Quad Core Server Xeon E5620 2.4GHz
16GB RAM
500GB Storage
10TB Bandwidth
average PTS mine per day with the said specs?
TIA,
Mike
this block
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/block/32639
had 4115 shares per minute
a single e5620 would probably get about 1.5 shares/m? so it would have received 0.0079017010935601 from that block.
i dont have a protoshares calculator or anything, so dont know how many blocks this pool should average per day. just from eyeballing it for a few mins, i guess around 14 avg after taking away some as orphans. so 14 * 0.0079, around 0.11, based on 4115 sh/m. the website usually reports 5000+ though.
uh, my guess would be .08-.10 a day, well, more like .07-.09, because I think 1.5 sh/m is overly generous
-
Guys,
anyone tried to mine using beeeer.org pool using this specs
Dual Quad Core Server Xeon E5620 2.4GHz
16GB RAM
500GB Storage
10TB Bandwidth
average PTS mine per day with the said specs?
TIA,
Mike
I was getting 0.186 PTS per day on one Xeon W3530 before the difficulty increase on the 22nd. Now I'm getting 0.0516 PTS/day by my calculations :(
Might be time for the pool to change to 0.01 payout threshold?
-
Yep, this new difficulty increase was harsh. I'm 16 hours in with the HP Cloud on a 4XL server, 10 hours' worth paid out and that's only ~0.07. I might get 0.21 total, maybe a little more before the ~26.5 hours ($50) free runs up.
Kind of sad really.. $50 worth of server time, $5 worth of PTS. But free money is money.
-
@zvs, @skaffen, @kfuzion
many thanks for your reply, ok then seems still no profit for
Dual Quad Core Server Xeon E5620 2.4GHz
16GB RAM
500GB Storage
10TB Bandwidth
that is 450$ month :(
thanks thanks,
Mike
-
This pool needs some more mining support! I've been mining on here for more than a month, it is a little curious why not as many people mine here as other sites.
- Very reliable, hasn't gone down in a month
- ypool got 14 out of the last 24 blocks, thats 58%! This is risky for protoshares network, because if ypool get's hacked, a 51% attack can bring down the network?
- the miner is as fast as any others (correct me if I'm wrong), which means you make at least the same on beeeer as anywhere else.
- lower fees, ypool has 6% fee, beeer
3% actually it's 2.5% - smaller automatic payout threshold, ypool's minimum is 1 PTS, beeeer's is 0.2, better for small miners.
- Better, more advanced user interface! ;)
-
This pool needs some more mining support! I've been mining on here for more than a month, it is a little curious why not as many people mine here as other sites.
- Very reliable, hasn't gone down in a month
- ypool got 14 out of the last 24 blocks, thats 58%! This is risky for protoshares network, because if ypool get's hacked, a 51% attack can bring down the network?
- the miner is as fast as any others (correct me if I'm wrong), which means you make at least the same on beeeer as anywhere else.
- lower fees, ypool has 6% fee, beeer 3%
- smaller automatic payout threshold, ypool's minimum is 1 PTS, beeeer's is 0.2, better for small miners.
- Better, more advanced user interface! ;)
How many prs did you mine in 1 month. Does it profitable or ROI is positive?...ive been playing around this one using digitalocean, dedicated server..still no profit...i think its much better to buy on exchange rather than mining...i dont want to pull down this thread but for the moment with the current price of pts
Mike
-
It was profitable for me, before the difficulty increase a few days ago. It depends on your costs of course.
-
I just started with pts a couple days ago. Figures, just at difficulty increase but anyway I'm having fun.
Using the Azure free trial is pretty good. 2 extra large and a large widows machines. The ubuntu server 10.3 won't run the miner for some reason.
The HP Cloud will run...but slow. I tried the 16 small instances idea, but it didn't work. Just gonna burn up the $50 with a 16 core.
If you did want to buy pts what's the absolute easiest way to go about it?
Found the buy pts subforum :)
-
It would be helpful for new people working under linux to have the following instruction stated in first post:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install yasm -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev
sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ~/ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
Running CentOS 6.5, this command doesn't work for me. I'm 99% (there's always that 1%...) certain I have all the dependencies required. This is the output I receive:
make -f makefile.unix
g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/cpuid.o cpuid.c
make: g++: Command not found
make: *** [obj/cpuid.o] Error 127
When I run ./osfinder.sh, it correctly recognizes my distro as RedHat. The error references "cpuid.o", where that file doesn't seem to exist in the .zip I downloaded.
It's probably a PEBKAC issue, but I can't figure out why this won't compile! Hopefully I provided all relevant info necessary.
edit: I also have tried the following from Jabbaah found here (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg9929#msg9929):
I checked the ptsminer compilation on a CentOS 6.3 VM now. Following is the way it works...
Use the makefile.unix.no-chrono - fire up your favourite editor and change line 27 as follows:
Old:
-l boost_thread$(BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX)
New:
-l boost_thread-mt$(BOOST_LIB_SUFFIX)
Now compile using
make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono clean
make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
Voilà! You should get a brand new ptsminer on CentOS. ;-)
-
I really hate to be that guy, but I believe I am doing things wrong, maybe something got lost in translation since English isn't my language because I have read the whole thread trying to figure out where my settings are wrong. I am a complete rookie at this, but I would like to learn. As for now I have mined for a day or so, but it seems like this work isn't getting where it should and it is probably something I failed at. I don't have a super computer but thought that I atleast would be able to see something when searching for my user but nothing yet, reading the thread I have tried to go to the page and Ctrl+f search for my user but it's nowhere.
My user is: PsN4yAoZYbEfzN4gsAU7KCGvYAMF6KYC1u
I am running a i7 3770K with 16 GB, I am using the v0.7 version of your miner ( the AVX one)
[WORKER] collision found: 19674410 <-> 56023126 #12576 @ 1387013977 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-14 10:34:31 | 170.4 c/m | 2.6 sh/m | VL: 2101 (98.5%), RJ: 33 (
1.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Thanks
-
@neverenough:
i can't find any substring of your address either in the payouts, since when are you mining? the first stats will appear when a block has been found (aka a round ends) you participated in!
what's the command line you use to start the miner?
@MrDiscordia:
g++ (the C++ compiler) is missing!
@skaffen:
it's 6% for ypool and ~1% for yv1900 (or whatever his nickname is), his commonly used miner is taking fees too...
i know that my ptsminer is not the most efficient one and the stats on the webfrontend looks crappy, but people dont seem to care about the network as long as there's profit (thinking about the transaction "bug" of jh's pts miner, >50% pools etc.pp.)
&
yes, the new diff is hitting hard. :(
- xolokram
-
@MrDiscordia:
g++ (the C++ compiler) is missing!
HA, how embarassing.... I was just using this as a web server and didn't even think that'd be an issue. :-[
-
@xolokram
Thanks for looking into it! Have been mining for a day almost :)
This is the command line in the "ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat" file: ptsminer_avx_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
Oops! That is not my address... I guess I have to change that to my own and that everything should be OK after that?
Thanks in advance
-
yeah looks like you've mined for a different address
-
@neverenough
Don't sweat it. You've got a good cpu. Look into the free cloud mining and you'll be doing fine. http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=937.msg8370#msg8370
@xolokram
Thanks for everything. I love the homespun feel of Beeeeer. Reminds me of the BBS days. My beverage of choice as well. :)
-
Okay, so I was thinking it would be smooth sailing from here... I should know by now that's never how it works! I'm terrible at reading error output, so I thank anyone ahead of time for the brainpower invested.
While trying to compile:
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread-mt -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
Here's a bit on my processor, if it matters:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 2659.942
cache size : 6144 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
bogomips : 5319.88
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
edit: My previous post with more info on my rig (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg14659#msg14659)
-
Please, Could anyone post a step-by-step how to compile the src code for Red Hat? I can't compile it. HELP!
-
Just need to install EPEL repo for yasm
rpm -Uvh http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
next step:
yum install gcc-c++ yasm autoconf automake boost-devel make zlib-devel
ln -s /usr/lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.5 /usr/lib64/libboost_thread.so
and then, unzip and compile.
or
yum install git
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
TO:MrDiscordia
package zlib-devel missing
-
Just need to install EPEL repo for yasm
rpm -Uvh http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
next step:
yum install gcc-c++ yasm autoconf automake boost-devel make zlib-devel
ln -s /usr/lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.5 /usr/lib64/libboost_thread.so
and then, unzip and compile.
or
yum install git
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
TO:MrDiscordia
package zlib-devel missing
Really thank you! It works really fine. Thaaaaaaaaaaank you :P
-
@xolokram
Thanks for looking into it! Have been mining for a day almost :)
This is the command line in the "ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat" file: ptsminer_avx_intel.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28
Oops! That is not my address... I guess I have to change that to my own and that everything should be OK after that?
Thanks in advance
haha it is xolokram donate pts address lol
-
WOW...12 hours for the last block.
Difficulty or people leaving to mine Doge's? ;D
Glad that's over.....
-
Is buying more RAM and using a greater RAM parameter actually supposed to help!??!
I bought 32GB -- dumb because I was running 8 threads and I can do that at 2GB per thread but not 4GB per thread b/c then there is no OS room left -- and my stupid computer system doesn't recognize the DD3-2400 Mhz (Pc3-19200) speed and drops down to 1333Mhz. The older RAM was 1600 Mhz.
At any rate, more RAM, slower speed -- it seems to be churning away at roughly the same 2.2 or now, 2.1, mh/s.
Is greater RAM actually supposed to make hashing PTS faster? Doesn't seem to make any difference.
-
hello
i'm new here and i try to test your pool
could you tell me for each column the signification ?
and tell me if its working for me
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-17 17:02:49 | 59.3 c/m | 1.1 sh/m | VL: 22 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0
%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
Is greater RAM actually supposed to make hashing PTS faster? Doesn't seem to make any difference.
As near as I can tell, more RAM (and higher RAM parameter) will help a bit, but it's highly dependent on how fast your RAM is, and the bus speed, and the timing, etc... If the data being stuffed into RAM is too large for the pipeline feeding it, it becomes a performance bottleneck, and slows you down. You can only test it and see what happens on your machine.
-
@trankil
Yes....you are mining.
Yea.....default ram setting seems to be best on pretty much all the machines I've tried.
-
yes, i'm still alive
nothing to add
-
Hi I am trying to use ptsminer_v07b_x64 and I have this processor right here: http://products.amd.com/en-ca/DesktopCPUDetail.aspx?id=522&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=&f10=&f11=&f12= (http://products.amd.com/en-ca/DesktopCPUDetail.aspx?id=522&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=&f10=&f11=&f12=)
Which version and which mode should I use for mining?
Thanks in advance!
-
As a Christmas gift to xolokram and a very modest token of appreciation I'll switch my mining for a few days to his donation address:
PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap
Thanks for staying on the boards and doing the bug and feature fixes xolokram.
Join me if you feel inclined! Merry Christmas all.
-
Hey....I just put together a new rig and had hard drive trouble so I thought I'd boot off an ububtu stick
and mine till I sorted out the problem.
All is fine except:
[code]ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package libboost-all-dev
E: Unable to locate package dos2unix[/code]
Then obviously I can't compile it...is the source only for ubuntu server or is something else up?
-
So we have not found a single block since 06:50:44 today?
-
Hey....I just put together a new rig and had hard drive trouble so I thought I'd boot off an ububtu stick
and mine till I sorted out the problem.
All is fine except:
[code]ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package libboost-all-dev
E: Unable to locate package dos2unix[/code]
Then obviously I can't compile it...is the source only for ubuntu server or is something else up?
Not sure which source you're talking about, but in any of the cases I can think of, it wouldn't just be for 'Ubuntu server', it'd be for any version of Ubuntu.
I don't know what this ubuntu on a stick is, but maybe it's missing some repository information.
You don't need dos2unix to run ptsminer. You could either add the repositories, or try libboost1.53-all-dev or libboost1.49-all-dev
-
As a Christmas gift to xolokram and a very modest token of appreciation I'll switch my mining for a few days to his donation address:
PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap
Thanks for staying on the boards and doing the bug and feature fixes xolokram.
Join me if you feel inclined! Merry Christmas all.
Three cheers for xolo! :)
-
So we have not found a single block since 06:50:44 today?
Yeah it seems like the blocks are coming quite a bit slower.
-
happy holidays
@btc2084:
thank you very much
@doxymoron:
randomness, (bad) luck, it looks like the pool has no ambition to find blocks in the afternoons :-\
;)
- xolokram
-
Has beeeeer stopped updating their stats? They're not showing anything for me since 12/18. :-\
-
it's pretty unlikely that it stopped
and it's more unlikely that it only stopped for you (as nobody else complaining)
maybe you can check you miner state and/or post or PM your stats-url so we can help you more.
- xolokram
-
Is miner version 0.4 (32 bit) still available for download? Anyone has it?
The miner hardcode the hostname, but I am blocked by firewall and has to use a tunnel and cannot edit the host file.
-
it's pretty unlikely that it stopped
and it's more unlikely that it only stopped for you (as nobody else complaining)
maybe you can check you miner state and/or post or PM your stats-url so we can help you more.
- xolokram
I think I found it. I restarted ptsminer at some point and somehow the wallet address I gave it was missing 2 characters, so I guess I was generating protoshares for a nonexistent wallet. :'(
What's weird is that the 2 characters weren't missing from the beginning or the end of the string; they were the 6th and 7th characters from the end. ??? I always copy and paste the address from the protoshares wallet GUI so I can't imagine how characters were dropped from inside the string rather than one end or the other. Very strange. I've just lost some of my faith in Ubuntu copy and paste. I'll be carefully eyeballing every character of that address in the future.
-
I think I found it. I restarted ptsminer at some point and somehow the wallet address I gave it was missing 2 characters, so I guess I was generating protoshares for a nonexistent wallet. :'(
What's weird is that the 2 characters weren't missing from the beginning or the end of the string; they were the 6th and 7th characters from the end. ??? I always copy and paste the address from the protoshares wallet GUI so I can't imagine how characters were dropped from inside the string rather than one end or the other. Very strange. I've just lost some of my faith in Ubuntu copy and paste. I'll be carefully eyeballing every character of that address in the future.
Yep. That was the problem. I just restarted ptsminer with the correct address and almost immediately beeeeer showed a new block awaiting confirmation. It's the first new block since 12/18.
-
That one block is still waiting for confirmation 6 hours later and there are no new blocks. ???
-
davidm, send me a signed message from the correct address using the original protoshares client so i can verify that you're the owner
and name me the wrong address, so i can merge the payouts manually
- xolokram
-
Can someone share where I could find my individual shares/speed added if I am using multiple clients for mining.
-
For anyone using linux on 32 bits in order to properly compile just replace @
https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt
else (UNIX)
SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf64")
by
else (UNIX)
SET(CMAKE_ASM_FLAGS "-f elf32")
Test on latest Ubuntu version.
I am getting error
"/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_chrono
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
"
Kindly help.
-
davidm, send me a signed message from the correct address using the original protoshares client so i can verify that you're the owner
and name me the wrong address, so i can merge the payouts manually
- xolokram
When you say "the original protoshares client" do you mean protoshares-qt? How do I send a message with it?
And there's still something weird going on because there's still only that one new block and it's still awaiting confirmation 10 hours later.
-
I am getting error
"/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_chrono
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
"
Kindly help.
What are you trying to do?
Use the "no-chrono" makefile or remove the line containing chrono from your makefile.
-
...
When you say "the original protoshares client" do you mean protoshares-qt? How do I send a message with it?
And there's still something weird going on because there's still only that one new block and it's still awaiting confirmation 10 hours later.
yes, protoshares-qt.
"File" -> "Sign Message" -> enter address, a message and clock "Sign Message", send me the information (address+message+signature) via PM.
the latest :( block #34388 was confirmed on block #34508, just a few minutes ago
- xolokram
-
...
When you say "the original protoshares client" do you mean protoshares-qt? How do I send a message with it?
And there's still something weird going on because there's still only that one new block and it's still awaiting confirmation 10 hours later.
yes, protoshares-qt.
"File" -> "Sign Message" -> enter address, a message and clock "Sign Message", send me the information (address+message+signature) via PM.
the latest :( block #34388 was confirmed on block #34508, just a few minutes ago
- xolokram
Excuse me for being dense but what address do I enter? Your protoshares address (from your sig)? If I message you through Protoshares-qt why do I also need to send you a PM?
-
If one stops mining with < .2 pts since last payout, how can one request a payout of the unpaid balance? Thanks
-
@BigChase:
follow what i write/wrote davidm.
@davidm:
you enter the address from your wallet you want to sign a message with
then you type in the message and then you can get the signature for that message from your address
after this you PM me the message, the signature and the address here in the forum so i can verify everything
for further infomration: pls, google
this is a (useful) feature for all altcoins based on bitcoin
- xolokram
ps. new block *woohoo*
-
My few days of mining for @xolokram for Christmas gift "thanks" is up.
But if anyone else wants to do it, his donation address is listed at the bottom of each of his posts:
PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap
Thanks again xolokram for all the updates.
If you come up with a way to allow us to optionally submit feedback to the some system stats on our computer and mining speed I think it would be a wonderful addition.
I'd love to be able to opt in and provide computer model name / no / OS version / CPU & RAM along with average hashing speeds. Because I'd love to see what comes back as best bang for the buck if somehow possible.
-
@BigChase:
follow what i write/wrote davidm.
@davidm:
you enter the address from your wallet you want to sign a message with
then you type in the message and then you can get the signature for that message from your address
after this you PM me the message, the signature and the address here in the forum so i can verify everything
for further infomration: pls, google
this is a (useful) feature for all altcoins based on bitcoin
- xolokram
ps. new block *woohoo*
xolo, i'd like to request the same, but i can't sign a message, my mining address has been my cryptsy deposit, I PMed you about it. No changes to deposit address or anything fishy like that
-
@BigChase:
follow what i write/wrote davidm.
@davidm:
you enter the address from your wallet you want to sign a message with
then you type in the message and then you can get the signature for that message from your address
after this you PM me the message, the signature and the address here in the forum so i can verify everything
for further infomration: pls, google
this is a (useful) feature for all altcoins based on bitcoin
- xolokram
ps. new block *woohoo*
Sent.
-
@donshoe
Just running command to make file as shown in various tutorial.
I just need to find a binary for 32 bit OS
-
The client here:
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer.git
is about 5% faster
-
The client here:
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer.git
is about 5% faster
Yayh! It compiles on OSX
-
I tried this on ubuntu server 10.03 with this command:
make -f makefile.unix -j8
Wouldn't compile....is the j8 wrong?
Edit: Wow....34736 2013-12-22 20:43:34 10718 / 3988143
hmmmmmm......
-
Are we getting killed by other pools when finding blocks (ie. ypool)? I'm wondering if they just have a lot more workers than us, they are finding about 122 blocks per day. The payout is good when we do find one, but when it's only 2-3 per day now it doesn't add up to much.
-
I have a large number of CPM on ypool right now, I'm looking to switch. I feel they are abusing the Fee %, does anyone have metrics for comparison of miners?
-
@hammerbrain:
what error message do you get?
@pool(+sdmented+doxymoron):
yep, pool is pretty small (<4%) and the ptsminer is not the most efficient one :(
size of the pool shouldnt be an issue (as long as it's not very small), because bigger pools means more people to share the reward with
most important thing is the efficiency of the miner, which is a little bit suffering on beeeeer's pts pool due to the current rejection problem
i'll try to sort out this problem in the near future (@sdmented: feel free to wait for that or help us now :) )
@all:
no pool fees atm (along with less tech support :) ) for the next few days
happy holidays
- xolokram
-
I'll look at it, if the loss isn't too much I may just move my stuff sooner rather than later. Actually here very shortly I will have an extremely large number of machines. I really hope you can figure it out and get close to the speed of ypool. I'm not too concerned with the frequency of payouts being lower. I just need the daily income to be relatively close to what I'm getting currently.
-
@xolo
ld returned 1 exit status
error 1
Just to be clear I was trying the girinio fork.
Happy Holidays and much thanks to Xolo and Beeeer!
-
ld returned 1 exit statusshouldn't be the last line you get, can you post the line before that?
btw. thank you
- xolokram
-
I'll look at it, if the loss isn't too much I may just move my stuff sooner rather than later. Actually here very shortly I will have an extremely large number of machines. I really hope you can figure it out and get close to the speed of ypool. I'm not too concerned with the frequency of payouts being lower. I just need the daily income to be relatively close to what I'm getting currently.
I got about 20% more c/m from that other mining client, but the pool charged (I believe) 2% more, plus the miner would reset itself somewhat frequently, so you'd lose an additional x% from the 'free 20 seconds' that occurs at the start & every time it does reset, in the end probably something like 7-8% fee.
Well, i used to get about 20% more that is, the one @ https://github.com/girino/ptsminer.git , is about 10-15% less, but I'm still trying some things with it
(eg, Q6600 @ 2.4MHz gets me 65c/m now instead of 60c/m, but that one was compiled with icc, which took quite a while.. oh, i haven't tried it yet on something w/ avx, that should be more %)
i have noticed more rejects though, just in general from the last few days
-
when i run the beerminer with avx or sse4 i get this: http://pastebin.com/9ZtKwxQ6
Allthough the 2874960.0 c/m | 43440.0 sh/m sound pretty mouthwatering all my shares get rejected.
Could be the hoster blocking some things, yours is the only working miner. Without sse4 or avx flags i get regular mining speeds. Might there be a workaround?
-
Hi,
I'm really new to this coin, I download and ran the QT wallet. I tried 3 threads mining in the client and got 15 col/minute, then I tried the beeeeer pool, I got this
.....
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 32904452 <-> 63348830 @ 50
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-Dec-23 18:38:02 | 50.8 c/m | 1.0 sh/m | VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%
), ST: 0 (0.0%)
what are the c/m and sh/m means? I could not find any PTS mining calculator here, how can I calculate the time needed to mine 1 PTS or PTS / hour?
Thank you so much!
donation really appreciated : PjEYYNztdcuMP7ysR5fcSnHRZinZn4rFeT
-
@mcgun182
With 50 c/m or "collisions per minute" and 1 sh/m "shares per minute" you have a middle of the road, kinda older cpu. You need a more powerful cpu or A LOT of cpu's running simultaneously at that speed.
Try learning about cloud mining if just for the learning experience. Right now it will take you prolly three months for one pts.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=722.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=722.0)
@Xolo
ad8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x23e): undefined reference to `CProtoshareProcessor::~CProtoshareProcessor()'
main_poolminer.cpp:(.text._ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x26a): undefined reference to `CProtoshareProcessor::~CProtoshareProcessor()'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
-
I'm also getting the "Killed" message when trying to mine :(
Mining under ubuntu.
-
I have a feature request for the client. I really miss log files! It should not be too complicated to implement?
Also, one of my miners is also on a dodgy wlan and will loose its connection a couple of seconds every now and then. The miner crashes if its not able to resolve the host. Would it be possible to get the miner to wait 30 seconds and retry the connection it its not able to resolve the pool host?
-
I get 20% rejects when mining PTS on b(e^5)r.org I am using nevest git ptsminer with 4 threads, 512M per thread
is that normal?
-
I get 20% rejects when mining PTS on b(e^5)r.org I am using nevest git ptsminer with 4 threads, 512M per thread
is that normal?
no, i get about 5%
btw, I noticed there's a lot of pool hopping to this pool after a block is solved
payout is just proportional based on single block?
re: it going from 3000 spm to 5200 spm in the 3 minutes since last block
-
@xolo
ld returned 1 exit status
error 1
Just to be clear I was trying the girinio fork.
Happy Holidays and much thanks to Xolo and Beeeer!
my fork is still work in progress, this can happen sometimes. should be fixed now.
always use one of the lowercase makefiles (make -f makefile.unix, for example). The default makefile is mostly bogus (used for tests).
-
I get 20% rejects when mining PTS on b(e^5)r.org I am using nevest git ptsminer with 4 threads, 512M per thread
is that normal?
ok, now i am getting some horrific # of rejects (across all servers, some in w usa, some in e usa, some in w europe, some in e europe, 1 in asia)
i think it's related to the increase in activity. server probably cant handle it
my fork is still work in progress, this can happen sometimes. should be fixed now.
always use one of the lowercase makefiles (make -f makefile.unix, for example). The default makefile is mostly bogus (used for tests).
i'm getting more like 10-15% improvement now, when the server is actually functioning, heh.
(hmm, could just be some stuff I did on my end tho.. did you make any changes to the routines or anything?)
-
HELP, please. I have same problem on my own PC and VPS, it always shows to me just "connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds"... why? :'( tried ptsminer v0.7 and 0.5
-
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/2uoswuq.jpg)
Firewall disabled.... what should i do?...
-
@pikapika:
this is the PTS miner, for the PTS pool
please use a PTS address to connect to the server, not your XPM (primecoin) address!!
@the rest:
i'm trying to get to every point/issue and PM within the next days
please post useful miner / console outputs and try to search the thread before
c/m = collisions per minute (the actual calculation that's done for pts)
sh/m = submitted shares per minute
the rejection rate is a known issue
- xolokram
-
@pikapika:
this is the PTS miner, for the PTS pool
please use a PTS address to connect to the server, not your XPM (primecoin) address!!
Thx for the answer. But what did i do wrong?
Here is example from "ptsminer_HELP.txt" > "ptsminer_sse4.exe PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap 8 28" ... i tried it and it doesn't work! "connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337 no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds" and that's all...
What do you mean "use a PTS address to connect to the server, not your XPM (primecoin) address!!"?... give me an example... please..
-
when you start the ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat you should edit the ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat before, and -not- the ptsminer_HELP.txt
/EDIT: i'll just use this post as this is getting a little bit messy here
REPLACE THE PRIMECOIN ADDRESS (AGY...) IN THE PTSMINER_EDIT-ME.BAT WITH YOUR PROTOSHARES ADDRESS (Pbf...) AND START THE PTSMINER_EDIT-ME.BAT
-
when you start the ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat you should edit the ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat before, and -not- the ptsminer_HELP.txt
I did.. Here you can see my ptsminer_EDIT-ME.bat. Why can't connect?
(http://oi41.tinypic.com/1troxz.jpg)
-
/EDIT: i'll just use this post as this is getting a little bit messy here
REPLACE THE PRIMECOIN ADDRESS (AGY...) IN THE PTSMINER_EDIT-ME.BAT WITH YOUR PROTOSHARES ADDRESS (Pbf...) AND START THE PTSMINER_EDIT-ME.BAT
Oh.. seems i used PTS miner for Primecoin? o_O Shame on me. Sorry. Thank you.
-
I know it is a known issue, but just pointing out that I am too getting increased rejections, today I am getting 15-20%, when yesterday I was getting 5%. I got ptsminer from thbaumbach/ptsminer.
-
It is down in 3 computers plus 3 vps I have running...
-
I just noticed spm is going down in ptsweb.beeeeer.org so I guess it is down for everyone? Hope it gets fixed soon.
-
It wont connect for me either. Looks like the pool server is having some kind of problems.
-
Beeeer.org for PTS is down?
Here not connect more ...
Outside it began to reject all since yesterday also ources
[WORKER2] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
[WORKER4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER7] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
Anyone else with this problem?
-
good morning, backend is down, i'm working on it.
/edit:
it should be ok now
i'm sorry for the inconvenience
-
good morning, backend is down, i'm working on it.
/edit:
it should be ok now
i'm sorry for the inconvenience
Returned to mine. Rejecting enough, but returned.
That's what matters! :)
Thanks!
-
Hello guys,
I have these stats
[STATS] 2013-Dec-28 14:22:31 | 15.2 c/m | 0.2 sh/m | VL: 41 (82.0%), RJ: 9 (18.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
41 valid shares but if I look into http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org with my pay address I have only I block found. Can you explain me why?
Thanks!
-
shars != block
-
shars != block
Ok, is it possible to say something like 50 shares = 1 block or is it always different?
If is always different the only way to know how many blocks I'm discovering is to check in the pool, right?
-
shars != block
Ok, is it possible to say something like 50 shares = 1 block or is it always different?
If is always different the only way to know how many blocks I'm discovering is to check in the pool, right?
it's always different
you probably aren't discovering any blocks, i don't know if the client tells you or not
the found pool blocks are @ http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/blocks
-
Now is clear. Thanks to explain me
-
Can somebody please give me an estimate of the approximate SH/m I should be achieving with a i5 3470 (3.6Ghz) under the default 0.7 settings with 4 instances?
Thanks, this information is really hard to find!
-
@xolokram -
Suggestions for claiming memorycoins for pts earlier than block 32001?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1310.0
Any idea if you are going to start a MMC / Memorycoin pool also?
-
@girino
Thanks! Up and running....compiled fine and getting a nice %5 bump. Appreciate your work. Donation imminent. :D
-
@girino
Thanks! Up and running....compiled fine and getting a nice %5 bump. Appreciate your work. Donation imminent. :D
If you're using sse4 you might try wjchen's fork. He's done some tuning to the ASM code and you can get an extra 3% (at least i did on my chromebook, not sure how it does on a "real" machine.)
https://github.com/wjchen/ptsminer
I'll check with him if his changes can be applied to avx or if it's sse4 only.
-
Hi,
Why from the 20 PTS Reward, 18.60596848873208 is for just 1 address?
And all the rest 0.00XXXXX
Sorry if it is obvious... this is my first mining action... dont understand very well...
I´m talking about this payment: http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/payout/36254
Thanks!
-
rejects rejects rejects i am getting a minimum of 25% most of the time 30% rejects all the time
using newest git version ptsminer on gentoo gnu/linux x86_64
I've upgraded gcc and compiling a new binary now, i'll give it a shot
-
xolokram,
If one would like to name protocol used by ptsminer in URI, what should be appropriate? Is be5r OK? Something like be5r://ptsmine.beeeeer.org:1337 looks reasonable?
Also what is intended function of fee_to_pay in login msg? Shall be set exactly as in current git version or has some flexibility?
yvg1900
Sent from my AT10PE-A using Tapatalk
-
(altough i'm probably too late for some of you)
happy new year
etc.pp.
@yvg:
it is/was a part of primecoin miner (which is the base source code of this miner)
it's ignored by the pts pool
will think about the URI thing
@noobster:
i know
@manobra:
that is a invalid protoshares address. the pool (and everyone else) is not able to send a payout to this address, but someone mined on it...
and it's not the payout for 1 found block, it's the sum of all payouts until then. check the "add" field for the payouts for one block.
- xolokram
-
it looks better for now, I get less that 10% rejected which is nice :D
happy new year everybody!
-
Hey!
Tks for replying!
Well.... if 18 PTS were mined to an invalid address.... what happens with these PTSs?
I already got 0.000284 PTS!!! Damm!!!!
Happy new year!!!
-
@xolokram
Hey Xolo! My fellow miners convinced me to return to PTS mining, and as you know the miner doesn't like my rig. :'(
Here's my new problem: I downloaded the newest PTS miner (update 3) but sometimes upon launching the miner using my .bat file (which is that dirty workaround I made) the miner crashes saying: "No such host known"
What's going on? I can access ptsweb.beeeeer.org just fine with my browser but with the miner, it's hit and miss....
Any idea's? (maybe make the miner continuously ignore that error and force reconnect??)
-
ugh I hate it when it takes 10 hours to find a block :(
If it takes 1 hour I get 0.015 PTS
If it takes 10 hours I get 0.015 PTS
If it takes 2 years I get 0.015 PTS
-
@Surfer43:
you know that you're paid proportional per block?
@Silver_Pharaoh:
hi and welcome back
that problem sounds strange, are you losing your connection that often?
i'll look in this problem, but i honestly think it's more your connection than something with the pool/miner
@manobra:
nothing happens, until someone's able to give me a clear evidence of a typo (PM'ing me the correct address & a verifiable signature) or something like this
every now and then i post invalid mining addresses (there are more than just this one the pool) in this thread and hope for some useful answers... i guess it's time again to do this :)
- xolokram
-
@Surfer43:
you know that you're paid proportional per block?
some should carry over, to discourage pool hopping
i usually get more on longer blocks
-
@xolokram,
Any idea on URI name?
Y.
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get updates on performance mining software
-
@Surfer43:
you know that you're paid proportional per block?
---
- xolokram
Does that change the payout for blocks taking more shares? If I get more shares won't everyone else, causing me to get the same payout no matter the shares it took for the block?
-
Can you give us an idea of what each pool share is worth?
Say I mine 100 valid shares, how much Protoshares is that equal to?
Thanks
-
Sorry, does it supports multiple instances/machines with the same PTS address??
-
Sorry, does it supports multiple instances/machines with the same PTS address??
Yes. Works fine.
-
Can you give us an idea of what each pool share is worth?
Say I mine 100 valid shares, how much Protoshares is that equal to?
Thanks
A share is worth what a share is worth for that block ;)
Divide your shares by the number of shares generated for that block to get your proportion of the payout.
There isn't a set "rate" that each share is worth, it all depends on how many shares are generated, and how many users are generating the shares for that block.
On your user page it shows you what your portion of the total payout is for each block.
-
Can you give us an idea of what each pool share is worth?
Say I mine 100 valid shares, how much Protoshares is that equal to?
Thanks
A share is worth what a share is worth for that block ;)
Divide your shares by the number of shares generated for that block to get your proportion of the payout.
There isn't a set "rate" that each share is worth, it all depends on how many shares are generated, and how many users are generating the shares for that block.
On your user page it shows you what your portion of the total payout is for each block.
Yes!!
Some times 10 shares sent = 0.00002 PTS (10 shares from a total of 3.444.777 shares) => 20 PTS divided by 3.444.777 x 10 = 0.00002)
At the same time, I can send 10 shares (from a total of 15.333 shares) => 20 PTS divided by 15.333 x 10 = 0.0122)
PS: These are fake numbers, it is just for you to understand de math!
Hope I help!
Happy new Year!!!
-
@Surfer43:
you know that you're paid proportional per block?
some should carry over, to discourage pool hopping
i usually get more on longer blocks
Hmm I seem to be getting more each block, now I'm up to 0.023 / block
-
@Surfer43:
you know that you're paid proportional per block?
some should carry over, to discourage pool hopping
i usually get more on longer blocks
Hmm I seem to be getting more each block, now I'm up to 0.023 / block
Probably miners dropping off increasing your cut.
-
Wooot! We just found a 'LEET' block ;-)
38327 2014-01-03 13:37:18
-
xolokram,
Any decision on URI naming? If no objection, I will use xram4:// to reflect comments made in sources, and major/minor version set as appropriate.
Now for others - I have yam M7i version with beeeeer protocol support, so if some will be interested in private testing - PM me and I will send you download link.
If testing will be OK I will add this support to main line and keep joint distribution.
yvg1900
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to get updates on performance mining software
-
hi
sorry for the late reply
i'm ok with xram4 or be5r
- xolokram
-
Great, thanks.
So I decided to use xram4:// because of the protocol is already used for MMC that is not under be^5r domain.
yvg1900
-
sounds reasonable
-
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SSE4
spawning 7 worker thread(s)
[WORKER1[WORKER] Hello, World!0
[WORKER] Hello, World![WORKER
2] Hello, World!
3] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
[WORKER2] GoGoGo![WORKER
[WORKER3] GoGoGo!
4] GoGoGo!
[WORKER5] Hello, World!
[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
look what i get when i run ptsminer How i can change this server ??
-
can you provide us (or PM me) the command line you're running?
-
Hi there.
reat work by the way, Loved the XPM pool, came accross to you from another XPM pool because yours was WAAAYY better!
Any way.
I have just started mining the protoshares and i am not sure if i am doing it right? Such a nooooob question!!
My mining address is PpT7tF3iePtoTSoBxf67w64AFpQXDdA98E
[WORKER] collision found: 28858109 <-> 21561068 #2596 @ 1388924709 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:16:56 | 140.9 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 44 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 63607505 <-> 26363538 #2608 @ 1388924684 by 4
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:17:00 | 141.0 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 45 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 25237536 <-> 34950510 #2702 @ 1388924758 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:17:36 | 141.5 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 46 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 15120856 <-> 4275851 #2744 @ 1388924277 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:17:49 | 142.1 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 47 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 41292389 <-> 39837127 #2818 @ 1388924319 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:18:24 | 141.6 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 48 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0
0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Is this normal?
Thanks again!
-
i am not sure if i am doing it right?
yea looks good.
you have successfully submitted a share:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
Your reject-rate (RJ) is 0%, therefore every share was accepted!
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 23:18:24 | 141.6 c/m | 2.4 sh/m | VL: 48 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
I just join in this pool.
Is there anything wrong as I go to my user page but see no details yet.
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:49:29 | 102.2 c/m | 1.8 sh/m | VL: 98 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 65526009 <-> 52238070 #5722 @ 1388926405 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:50:03 | 101.9 c/m | 1.8 sh/m | VL: 99 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 42401142 <-> 28747745 #5766 @ 1388926453 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:50:30 | 101.9 c/m | 1.8 sh/m | VL: 100 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 16802576 <-> 46264772 #5968 @ 1388926640 by 0
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:52:40 | 101.6 c/m | 1.7 sh/m | VL: 101 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 3508072 <-> 24410417 #6154 @ 1388926499 by 3
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:54:45 | 101.2 c/m | 1.7 sh/m | VL: 102 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 51764290 <-> 58373558 #6210 @ 1388926533 by 5
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:55:10 | 101.4 c/m | 1.7 sh/m | VL: 103 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
At the rate I am sharing, how much pts can I earn in a day roughly
Thanks!
-
I just join in this pool.
Is there anything wrong as I go to my user page but see no details yet.
it looks good.
you have successfully submitted a share:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
Your reject-rate (RJ) is 0%, therefore every share was accepted!
[STATS] 2014-Jan-05 07:55:10 | 101.4 c/m | 1.7 sh/m | VL: 103 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
just wait until a block is found to see stats.
At the rate I am sharing, how much pts can I earn in a day roughly
Thanks!
Time to find a block mining solo: 9.884 months, Turnout: 0.064 PTS/day.
-
Just need to install EPEL repo for yasm
rpm -Uvh http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
next step:
yum install gcc-c++ yasm autoconf automake boost-devel make zlib-devel
ln -s /usr/lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.5 /usr/lib64/libboost_thread.so
and then, unzip and compile.
or
yum install git
git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
cd ptsminer/src
make -f makefile.unix
./ptsminer <your PTS address> <number of threads>
TO:MrDiscordia
package zlib-devel missing
Really thank you! It works really fine. Thaaaaaaaaaaank you :P
Hey,
i followed these steps exactly but i am getting errors anyway :(
yes, i am under redhat.
these are the errors (in german):
[root@machine src]# make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/nfs/home/y0057486/cpu_vision-v0.2/ptsminer/src -I/nfs/home/y0057486/cpu_vision-v0.2/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/thread/future.hpp:12,
from /usr/include/boost/thread.hpp:24,
from main_poolminer.hpp:6,
from main_poolminer.cpp:13:
/usr/include/boost/exception_ptr.hpp:43: Fehler: lockerer »throw«-Spezifizierer für »virtual boost::exception_ptr::~exception_ptr()«
/usr/include/boost/exception/detail/exception_ptr_base.hpp:26: Fehler: »virtual boost::exception_detail::exception_ptr_base::~exception_ptr_base() throw ()« wird überschrieben
make: *** [obj/main_poolminer.o] Fehler 1
any ideas? :)
-
Rofl "Fehler: lockerer »throw«-Spezifizierer für »virtual boost::exception_ptr::~exception_ptr()«" ... German translations are so funny in software development!
I've not seen that issue so far, no idea!
-
:D
beside the funny things, i could fix the problem my self:
http://dev.thep.lu.se/yat/attachment/ticket/762/exception_ptr_h.patch
editing the exeption_ptr.hpp like in the above link was succesful ;)
thanks for response anyway ;)
greets FaKo
-
Hello guys :-*
I new user
When is to change?? i see it 0 through.
http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/Pbaoin4CDyeFs46j7ptBCqtLijcDKWdPux
is correct?
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:34:54 | 205.1 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 125 (91.9%), RJ: 11 (8.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 13617335 <-> 29563627 #6472 @ 1389019009 by 1
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:35:04 | 205.5 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 126 (92.0%), RJ: 11 (8.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 54067803 <-> 65978771 #6584 @ 1389019398 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:35:35 | 205.6 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 127 (92.0%), RJ: 11 (8.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 52076300 <-> 53682480 #6618 @ 1389019422 by 6
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:35:46 | 205.6 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 128 (92.1%), RJ: 11 (7.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 47701659 <-> 65861630 #6624 @ 1389019436 by 20
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:35:47 | 205.7 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 129 (92.1%), RJ: 11 (7.9%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 9357112 <-> 31619012 #6682 @ 1389019405 by 13
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:36:02 | 205.9 c/m | 3.6 sh/m | VL: 130 (92.2%), RJ: 11 (7.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 48382392 <-> 51515087 #6688 @ 1389019240 by 16
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:36:04 | 205.8 c/m | 3.7 sh/m | VL: 131 (92.3%), RJ: 11 (7.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 25393119 <-> 29678735 #6774 @ 1389019605 by 21
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-06 08:36:24 | 206.3 c/m | 3.7 sh/m | VL: 132 (92.3%), RJ: 11 (7.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
It depends on our pool finding a block. When a new block is mined by the pool shares getdistributed. Sometimes this happens once per hour, other times once a day. Just an idea of the amount of variance involved.
-
I was mining for the last few days and it was just fine, however today i get loads of rejects again. about 30%
what is the reason for that? where the pool is located? maybe its because of latency I get like 190 ms... consider opening another pool in europe maybe? or loose miners.
thanks
-
I was mining for the last few days and it was just fine, however today i get loads of rejects again. about 30%
what is the reason for that? where the pool is located? maybe its because of latency I get like 190 ms... consider opening another pool in europe maybe? or loose miners.
thanks
It is possible there are more workers on the pool or the hash rate of the entire network got bigger. Both of these can increase the reject rate due to the mining of so called 'stale' blocks.
-
I was mining for the last few days and it was just fine, however today i get loads of rejects again. about 30%
what is the reason for that? where the pool is located? maybe its because of latency I get like 190 ms... consider opening another pool in europe maybe? or loose miners.
thanks
It is possible there are more workers on the pool or the hash rate of the entire network got bigger. Both of these can increase the reject rate due to the mining of so called 'stale' blocks.
This. the network and pool has indeed gotten bigger.
-
Hello, I am new to PTS ming. By looking through the thread, I am very disappointed to my hash rate, lower than most here. Here below are my results:
AMD FX-8350 running in the lastest Xubuntu system, with ptsminer compiled from source: 90-95 c/m.
I just got AMD FX-9590, tested in Win 8; tried ptsminer 0.7 and 0.5; 0.7 gives bad results: initially 110 c/m then slowly stablized at 70 c/m, while 0.5 gives about 110 c/m.
All hash rate are lower than here, so I am wondering whether these values are normal for AMD, then AMD worse than i7? or maybe I can try something to increase the rate?
Thank you for your help!
-
@xolokram,
Aren't early shares of PTS supposed to yield memorycoin?
I already asked but seemed to be overlooked or ignored -- is there a way for us to get our memorycoin shares if we early-minted with beeeeer pool?
-
@xolokram,
Aren't early shares of PTS supposed to yield memorycoin?
I already asked but seemed to be overlooked or ignored -- is there a way for us to get our memorycoin shares if we early-minted with beeeeer pool?
Uhm this pool does not store Protoshares and auto pays your shares at a threshold of 0.2 PTS.
...
You dont want to ask xolo to release the <0.2 PTS balances as MMC?
...
0.2 PTS yield 0.02 MMC.
...
0.02 MMC = 0.01 USD = 0.01 EUR = 0.00001 BTC = 0.00029 LTC.
...
I have a better idea: Get up to 2 free MMC here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2065.0
-
I don't want Memorycoins instead of PTS.
My understanding was that blocks of PTS 32000 and under "came with" Memorycoin when Memorycoin was released.
It is part of the incentive to mine PTS.
@xolokram,
Aren't early shares of PTS supposed to yield memorycoin?
I already asked but seemed to be overlooked or ignored -- is there a way for us to get our memorycoin shares if we early-minted with beeeeer pool?
Uhm this pool does not store Protoshares and auto pays your shares at a threshold of 0.2 PTS.
...
You dont want to ask xolo to release the <0.2 PTS balances as MMC?
...
0.2 PTS yield 0.02 MMC.
...
0.02 MMC = 0.01 USD = 0.01 EUR = 0.00001 BTC = 0.00029 LTC.
...
I have a better idea: Get up to 2 free MMC here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2065.0
-
How to get MemoryCoins from your Protoshares wallet is only possible when you have direct access to the wallet.dat file. Mining with beeeeer pool does not give you your own wallet (file), therefore it's not possible.
But you can get your MemoryCoins as follows:
Backup your Protoshares wallet.dat file (either by the 'backupwallet' command in Debug window of the Qt-Wallet, or by simply copying the wallet.dat to another location on your filesystem. Then install the MemoryCoin wallet program on your local computer but do not yet start it. I usually use the Linux wallet programs where you have to copy the Protoshares wallet.dat (the copy only of course) in the ~/memorycoin subdirectory. On Windows it should be somewhere under C:\User\<Username>\AppData\Roaming\MemoryCoin - you have to create the MemoryCoin subdirectory and also note that the AppData directory is a hidden one on Windows which will only become visibile when changing the display options for Windows Explorer.
After having copied the wallet.dat to the correct location you can startup the MemoryCoin wallet and magically it will produce 10% MemoryCoin out of your Protoshares balance. Please also note that only the balance from sometime in December 2013 will taken into account, therefore you must use the wallet.dat from the Protoshares wallet software you used this time - even when you transferred those PTS to another account meanwhile.
Hope this helps to clarify how Protoshares and getting MemoryCoins from PTS is working. I tested this procedure already and I've got my share of MMC this way.
My PTS:
PZyVvDjjKnoCqmboDFT7ZM7TcDhZ38vWgf
-
Hi,
sorry, btc2084, if i've overlooked your previous post.
i haven't looked into memorycoins atm.
the pool of course owns a protoshares wallet that should be convertable into a memorycoin wallet. but the pool "only" holds the unpaid payouts from the miners caused by the payout barrier, which is something like 250 PTS in total, thanks to the high demand of a very low payout barrier <-- sorry, i had to mention this :)
so we've like 25 MMC (just a guess, as this has to be checked for block #32000)
and we would have to find a way to convert everything (on a fair basis) for the several hundreds of payout address on the pool.
so my impression at the moment: it's a low priority issue
sorry, if this is not really statisfying.
@pooh20240:
you'll have to wait until the first round, you've participated in, ends (aka block has been found), which already happened now :)
so i guess you've seen it
@joelao95:
unfortunately yes, what i've seen so far is that Intel's CPUs are more efficient & faster than AMD's CPUs.
- xolokram
ps. thx jabbaah & donschoe
-
that few MMC would make a good donation for providing a pool by xolokram
@xolokram are there any known steps i could do to reduce the reject rate?
also for fellow miners i did notice one thing:
i have 4 core cpu and 4 gig mem and I get better results if I fire up more threads @ 512M (say like 7 gives 3,5GB) than only four (given 4 threads on cpu)
conlusion: use more threads to fill up unused memory
waiting for your thoughts on that =)
-
that few MMC would make a good donation for providing a pool by xolokram
Signed.
As a start I donate my (very) small MMC share to xolokram for operating a stable pool. Thank you!
also for fellow miners i did notice one thing:
i have 4 core cpu and 4 gig mem and I get better results if I fire up more threads @ 512M (say like 7 gives 3,5GB) than only four (given 4 threads on cpu)
conlusion: use more threads to fill up unused memory
waiting for your thoughts on that =)
That's intended. The more CPU power you put into mining, the higher the output. Configuring more RAM per CPU core only gives an advantage if you have very fast RAM in your machine. Testing this out is up to you. Anyway the difference is only very small. The big difference is the number of cores like you correctly stated already.
-
also for fellow miners i did notice one thing:
i have 4 core cpu and 4 gig mem and I get better results if I fire up more threads @ 512M (say like 7 gives 3,5GB) than only four (given 4 threads on cpu)
conlusion: use more threads to fill up unused memory
waiting for your thoughts on that =)
That's intended. The more CPU power you put into mining, the higher the output. Configuring more RAM per CPU core only gives an advantage if you have very fast RAM in your machine. Testing this out is up to you. Anyway the difference is only very small. The big difference is the number of cores like you correctly stated already.
But the quad multicore cpu can handle more threads without any problem. My thought was not to provide more ram per thread, instead fire up more threads to fill up unused memory.
thanks
-
also for fellow miners i did notice one thing:
i have 4 core cpu and 4 gig mem and I get better results if I fire up more threads @ 512M (say like 7 gives 3,5GB) than only four (given 4 threads on cpu)
conlusion: use more threads to fill up unused memory
waiting for your thoughts on that =)
That's intended. The more CPU power you put into mining, the higher the output. Configuring more RAM per CPU core only gives an advantage if you have very fast RAM in your machine. Testing this out is up to you. Anyway the difference is only very small. The big difference is the number of cores like you correctly stated already.
But the quad multicore cpu can handle more threads without any problem. My thought was not to provide more ram per thread, instead fire up more threads to fill up unused memory.
thanks
Ah, sorry. My fault. I should read an article more carefully before hitting the reply button. ;-)
That's indeed interesting. One should think that 4 threads on a 4 core cpu is 100% load and cannot be more increased.
Is there is significant difference? How much collisions/minute is the difference (4 threads / 7 threads)?
-
Hey, beeeeer folks - just a heads-up: I released my GPU miner hard-coded to use beeeeer, as I based the source on ptsminer.
Hold on to your pants and have fun. :-)
-Dave
-
Hey, beeeeer folks - just a heads-up: I released my GPU miner hard-coded to use beeeeer, as I based the source on ptsminer.
Hold on to your pants and have fun. :-)
-Dave
WOOOT! Compiling ....
-
Hey, beeeeer folks - just a heads-up: I released my GPU miner hard-coded to use beeeeer, as I based the source on ptsminer.
Hold on to your pants and have fun. :-)
-Dave
WOOOT! Compiling ....
If it works well for you, please chime in on the main board thread to confirm that it's legit. :-) Happy to help with compile issues for linux/macos. I'm clueless about windows, but if you have tips, I can commit them.
-
Hey, beeeeer folks - just a heads-up: I released my GPU miner hard-coded to use beeeeer, as I based the source on ptsminer.
Hold on to your pants and have fun. :-)
-Dave
WOOOT! Compiling ....
Sorry, but ... did I miss some Github URL or something? I'd like to have a glance on this too - or is it an early announcement?
Will it support only ATI or also Nvidia GPUs?
-
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
-
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
Thanks! Definitely will have a look :)
-
got a problem in your site said paid at day 07 0,24 and i didnt recieved anything
(http://share.ayuhost.com/images/Yv2Zb.jpg)
please verify its 0,20 at least
adress:
PZM9sKwWyQxqXee1DWewYCGvx5fxGVKjjA
-
check your wallet / client, block #29557
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b53f58efb0e853667e175ea2f7f214406447d6e9ee74fe5a801b17c826dcc5a2
you can thank me later
- xolokram
-
check your wallet / client, block #29557
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b53f58efb0e853667e175ea2f7f214406447d6e9ee74fe5a801b17c826dcc5a2
you can thank me later
- xolokram
strange my wallet sync and nothing appears better do a -salvagewallet option to resync alll over again,
thanks
-
well my wallet sync and nothing appears
(http://share.ayuhost.com/images/CMxwb.jpg)
what can i do???
my last transation to my wallet was on day 11/12/2013
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PZM9sKwWyQxqXee1DWewYCGvx5fxGVKjjA
-
try
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=171390.0
with the protoshares client & your wallet
-
Hey everyone !
My pts wallet won't synch. I tried every addnode I could find. I tried different protoshares-qt.exe -add..... Nothing works
I went through the first pages of the post and on other forum's post in vain.
This is what I have :
ProtoShares version v0.8.5.0-unk-beta
IP proxy : 5.9.24.81 Port : 9050 SOCKS 5
Any ideas ?
Thanks
EDIT: Problem solved
-
also for fellow miners i did notice one thing:
i have 4 core cpu and 4 gig mem and I get better results if I fire up more threads @ 512M (say like 7 gives 3,5GB) than only four (given 4 threads on cpu)
conlusion: use more threads to fill up unused memory
waiting for your thoughts on that =)
That's intended. The more CPU power you put into mining, the higher the output. Configuring more RAM per CPU core only gives an advantage if you have very fast RAM in your machine. Testing this out is up to you. Anyway the difference is only very small. The big difference is the number of cores like you correctly stated already.
But the quad multicore cpu can handle more threads without any problem. My thought was not to provide more ram per thread, instead fire up more threads to fill up unused memory.
thanks
Ah, sorry. My fault. I should read an article more carefully before hitting the reply button. ;-)
That's indeed interesting. One should think that 4 threads on a 4 core cpu is 100% load and cannot be more increased.
Is there is significant difference? How much collisions/minute is the difference (4 threads / 7 threads)?
the difference is small with low-end ultra low voltage core i3-380UM i get:
@4 threads/512M about 20c/m
@7 threads/512M about 23c/m
not sure how this would impact high-end hardware
-
Hi, i am a new comer for beeeeer. Sometimes, the rejection rate is very high(>20%) on my machine. But another time, it is zero. So my question is what the factors will affect the rejection rate. When I got high rejection rate, restart miner can resolve it?
-
I'm new here, but we don't seem to have found a block for over 12 hours... is that normal or is there an issue with the pool?
-
I'm new here, but we don't seem to have found a block for over 12 hours... is that normal or is there an issue with the pool?
Me too >:( >:( >:( What happened ??????
-
I have the same problem.
Block number 40716 at 2014-01-09 05:34:28 GMT+1 and no new blocks.
Any problems with ptsweb.beeeeer.org or simply we are not lucky with finding new blocks?
P.
-
Block 40716 has confirmed now but still no new blocks after all day mining .
-
Almost every block is mined by ypool.
-
Finally a block after 12.5 hours
-
Yep:)
-
anyone having pay-out issues ? i got payment marked paid, but 12hrs later its not in my wallet still ...
-
@n00b2013:
check your address / transactions here...
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/
http://btsblock.com/
if it's there, it's in the blockchain, then go check your config / client / wallet etc.pp.
@pooh20240+ryen+pinov+hongor:
welcome to the cruel world of cryptocoins ;)
btw. ryen is right
& difficulty increase!!
@bizthinker:
unfortunately it's a bug somewhere (client/pool?) i haven't had time to look into, the miner should auto-reconnect on 3 rejects in a row!? <-- that's the dirty workaround atm
- xolokram
-
xolokram - thx for the explanation & good luck for all of you in mining PTS's!!!
-
Hi all, can anyone tell me the reason why someone can get share high share payout ? How can they do that... be honest, I used a super computer already with 128G Ram 8-way AMD CPU for mining.... but everything its got less than 0.0xxx , why ?
-
Hi all, can anyone tell me the reason why someone can get share high share payout ? How can they do that... be honest, I used a super computer already with 128G Ram 8-way AMD CPU for mining.... but everything its got less than 0.0xxx , why ?
because 50 e3-1270's is better than one 'super computer shitloads of extra useless RAM "8-way" AMD CPU'?
-
I am deciding to quit and join ypool. seems more effective..
-
I am deciding to quit and join ypool. seems more effective..
i am sure it will benefit greatly from your 128GB RAM 8-way AMD CPU
-
I am deciding to quit and join ypool. seems more effective..
i am sure it will benefit greatly from your 128GB RAM 8-way AMD CPU
Its really discourage me for spending so much time on beeeeeer... I am not just using one server for mining but actually 6 servers.... very poor payout.. why?? why?
I just thinking whether I did anything wrong...?
>> ptsminer_amd.exe PkYK3w87gYwfueDHwCaWFFARKq6B8747Rq 8 30 sph
How can someone got the payout over 0.5PTS ??? what are they using for mining ? Can anyone tell me ? Thanks
-
@n00b2013:
check your address / transactions here...
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/
http://btsblock.com/
if it's there, it's in the blockchain, then go check your config / client / wallet etc.pp.
- xolokram
did and i see it, but its not in bter, i guess they're the problem
-
@n00b2013:
check your address / transactions here...
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/
http://btsblock.com/
if it's there, it's in the blockchain, then go check your config / client / wallet etc.pp.
- xolokram
did and i see it, but its not in bter, i guess they're the problem
I had the same problem with BTER, they're very sloooooow sometimes. It took a few hours then it was displayed and received by BTER. I even thought about scam, but they seem only to be verrrrrrry slow sometimes.
Give it some time and it will be received. Thumbs up.
-
@zvs:
:D ymmd
@daice:
they are probably using hundreds of servers.
if you wanna use a different pool, go on. i won't force or beg you to use my pool
@n00b2013+(jabbaah):
yup, i experienced the same. bter seems to have some delay for their processing.
- xolokram
-
@zvs:
:D ymmd
@daice:
they are probably using hundreds of servers.
if you wanna use a different pool, go on. i won't force or beg you to use my pool
@n00b2013+(jabbaah):
yup, i experienced the same. bter seems to have some delay for their processing.
- xolokram
@xolokram
I just don't understand what's wrong with configuration and how comes they got such good performance as 100 times or more than mine.
-
anyone having pay-out issues ? i got payment marked paid, but 12hrs later its not in my wallet still ...
I'm having payout issues also, said paid on day 7 and didnt get it yet, already did -salvagewallet option and -rescan option,
on https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b53f58efb0e853667e175ea2f7f214406447d6e9ee74fe5a801b17c826dcc5a2
transation was made but on
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PZM9sKwWyQxqXee1DWewYCGvx5fxGVKjjA
didnt reach my wallet yet even with full sync
-
anyone having pay-out issues ? i got payment marked paid, but 12hrs later its not in my wallet still ...
I'm having payout issues also, said paid on day 7 and didnt get it yet, already did -salvagewallet option and -rescan option,
on https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b53f58efb0e853667e175ea2f7f214406447d6e9ee74fe5a801b17c826dcc5a2
transation was made but on
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PZM9sKwWyQxqXee1DWewYCGvx5fxGVKjjA
didnt reach my wallet yet even with full sync
Do we have a split in the coin chain? Just asking... when there is such a big pool running?
My wallet currently says:
"blocks" : 41027
Check yours.
-
good point, pool is at 41031 (so they seem to be sync)
coinplorer.com is at 41026 (seems to be ok too; with some delay)
check your local client @soulistyce
-
now my blockchain its at 41057 and no coins :-[
-
I dont understand all these complaints! This pool made me rich!
-
I dont understand all these complaints! This pool made me rich!
Maybe the pool has incredible unluck a last few days. I send 24000 cpm to the pool for one day and only 4 blocks were found. The difficulty is not rising the last few days too. One of the reason is because of ypool.net has grown too big for PTS.
-
Hello,
I have a problem (I think...) with ptsminer_v07b_x64
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Instructions sets MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V
I tried to use the SSE4 version but when receives first work crashes.
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sse4
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SSE4
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
Crash!
Only works AMD and SSE4 version with SPHLIB
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
ptsminer_amd PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
With my processor, ptsminer_sse4 with sse4 should be work, no?
Thank you!
-
I dont understand all these complaints! This pool made me rich!
Maybe the pool has incredible unluck a last few days. I send 24000 cpm to the pool for one day and only 4 blocks were found. The difficulty is not rising the last few days too. One of the reason is because of ypool.net has grown too big for PTS.
Unluck and luck evens out. I've been mining this pool since November 8th (day 0). Just dont hit F5 every minute.
-
cudapts working well for me, my first cuda app on my new card, nice way to test
GTX 660, 485 c/m with ptsminer running 330 c/m on 15 of 16 cores (dual socket xeon) as well
I think i need to go to 2 instances and numactl them for the cpu miner and squeeze a bit more out , as my 8 core xeon gets 220
Thanks to xolo for the pool and dave for cudapts :D
-
any progress on fixing current reject rate?
-
I dont understand all these complaints! This pool made me rich!
Maybe the pool has incredible unluck a last few days. I send 24000 cpm to the pool for one day and only 4 blocks were found. The difficulty is not rising the last few days too. One of the reason is because of ypool.net has grown too big for PTS.
https://coinplorer.com/Charts/Difficulty/PTS -> wednesday? network is growing.
@noobster:
no, i'm currently working on the primecoin pool/miner & website atm.
- xolokram
ps. small pool maintainence incoming!!!! server will be down for a few minutes *done*
-
I dont understand all these complaints! This pool made me rich!
Maybe the pool has incredible unluck a last few days. I send 24000 cpm to the pool for one day and only 4 blocks were found. The difficulty is not rising the last few days too. One of the reason is because of ypool.net has grown too big for PTS.
https://coinplorer.com/Charts/Difficulty/PTS -> wednesday? network is growing.
@noobster:
no, i'm currently working on the primecoin pool/miner & website
- xolokram
ps. small pool maintainence incoming!!!! server will be down for a few minutes *done*
I know that the difficulty explodes since 07-01 (maybe because of the new GPU miner). I just test your pool for one day so it's not easy to make some judgements too. I just share my opinion :). Since rpoot.net has more workers than beeer.org, I just have the impression that rpool.net is bigger, but they only find 5 blocks/day. So your pool is still more efficient.
Btw how could I see the total cpm of the pool ?
Thanks.
-
Hello,
I have a problem (I think...) with ptsminer_v07b_x64
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Instructions sets MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V
I tried to use the SSE4 version but when receives first work crashes.
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sse4
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SSE4
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
Crash!
Only works AMD and SSE4 version with SPHLIB
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
ptsminer_amd PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
With my processor, ptsminer_sse4 with sse4 should be work, no?
Thank you!
Sadly, no. Your processor does not support SSE4 but SS4a.
SSE4a: http://www.cpu-world.com/Glossary/S/SSE4a.html
SSE4: http://www.cpu-world.com/Glossary/S/SSE4.html
It looks like SSE4a was a 5-instruction set precursor to SSE4 by AMD ahead of Intels 54-instruction set. You'll have to run with sphlib.
-
is it somehow possible to modify the miner source to assign 768M of memory per thread?
i have searched through the code and found a snippet:
void mineloop_start() {
switch (COLLISION_TABLE_BITS) {
case 20: mineloop<(1<<20),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-20))),shamode>(); break;
case 21: mineloop<(1<<21),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-21))),shamode>(); break;
case 22: mineloop<(1<<22),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-22))),shamode>(); break;
case 23: mineloop<(1<<23),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-23))),shamode>(); break;
case 24: mineloop<(1<<24),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-24))),shamode>(); break;
case 25: mineloop<(1<<25),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-25))),shamode>(); break;
case 26: mineloop<(1<<26),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-26))),shamode>(); break;
case 27: mineloop<(1<<27),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-27))),shamode>(); break;
case 28: mineloop<(1<<28),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-28))),shamode>(); break;
case 29: mineloop<(1<<29),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-29))),shamode>(); break;
case 30: mineloop<(1<<30),(0xFFFFFFFF<<(32-(32-30))),shamode>(); break;
default: break;
}
}
any way to modify this list to contain 768M per thread?
-
Hello,
I have a problem (I think...) with ptsminer_v07b_x64
Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
Instructions sets MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V
I tried to use the SSE4 version but when receives first work crashes.
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sse4
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SSE4
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
ffffffffffffffbeefde4d
Crash!
Only works AMD and SSE4 version with SPHLIB
ptsminer_sse4 PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
ptsminer_amd PqDx4SxApxyN4Ui5A4qyFsR5PKD8wh5yDm 1 27 sph
With my processor, ptsminer_sse4 with sse4 should be work, no?
Thank you!
Sadly, no. Your processor does not support SSE4 but SS4a.
SSE4a: http://www.cpu-world.com/Glossary/S/SSE4a.html
SSE4: http://www.cpu-world.com/Glossary/S/SSE4.html
It looks like SSE4a was a 5-instruction set precursor to SSE4 by AMD ahead of Intels 54-instruction set. You'll have to run with sphlib.
Oh!
Thank you :))
-
Has anybody successfully mined on ptsweb.beeeeer.org on GPU?
Regards,
Pinov
-
Has anybody successfully mined on ptsweb.beeeeer.org on GPU?
Regards,
Pinov
Yes, I am doing it right now using the open source Linux miner from dga.
Info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
Repo here: https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
Works like a charm.
-
Has anybody successfully mined on ptsweb.beeeeer.org on GPU?
Regards,
Pinov
Yes, I am doing it right now using the open source Linux miner from dga.
Info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
Repo here: https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
Works like a charm.
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
-
Has anybody successfully mined on ptsweb.beeeeer.org on GPU?
Regards,
Pinov
Yes, I am doing it right now using the open source Linux miner from dga.
Info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
Repo here: https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
Works like a charm.
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
I'm just about to put an AMD GPU into a spare box I have, so I'll compile and let you know. :)
-
Has anybody successfully mined on ptsweb.beeeeer.org on GPU?
Regards,
Pinov
Yes, I am doing it right now using the open source Linux miner from dga.
Info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.0
Repo here: https://github.com/dave-andersen/cudapts
Works like a charm.
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
Getting the following error and exit for the make on Debian 7 (libboost and yasm are installed):
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLDevice::OpenCLDevice(_cl_device_id*)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x5b9): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLDevice::getName()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x672): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x69d): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLDevice::getMaxWorkGroupSize()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x709): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLDevice::getMaxMemAllocSize()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x769): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o:OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x7c9): more undefined references to `clGetDeviceInfo' follow
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLContext::createCommandQueue(OpenCLDevice*)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x9a4): undefined reference to `clCreateCommandQueue'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLContext::createBuffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, void*)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xa47): undefined reference to `clCreateBuffer'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::addGlobalArg(OpenCLBuffer*)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xbe7): undefined reference to `clSetKernelArg'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::addScalarLong(long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xc4e): undefined reference to `clSetKernelArg'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::addScalarInt(int)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xcad): undefined reference to `clSetKernelArg'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::addScalarULong(unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xd0e): undefined reference to `clSetKernelArg'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::addScalarUInt(unsigned int)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xd6d): undefined reference to `clSetKernelArg'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o:OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xe04): more undefined references to `clSetKernelArg' follow
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueWriteBuffer(OpenCLBuffer*, void*, unsigned long, _cl_event**, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xe68): undefined reference to `clEnqueueWriteBuffer'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueWriteBufferBlocking(OpenCLBuffer*, void*, unsigned long, _cl_event**, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xedb): undefined reference to `clEnqueueWriteBuffer'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueKernel1D(OpenCLKernel*, unsigned long, unsigned long, _cl_event**, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xf59): undefined reference to `clEnqueueNDRangeKernel'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueReadBuffer(OpenCLBuffer*, void*, unsigned long, _cl_event**, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xfc8): undefined reference to `clEnqueueReadBuffer'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueReadBufferBlocking(OpenCLBuffer*, void*, unsigned long, _cl_event**, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x103b): undefined reference to `clEnqueueReadBuffer'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::finish()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1088): undefined reference to `clFinish'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::getWorkGroupSize(OpenCLDevice*)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1124): undefined reference to `clGetKernelWorkGroupInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLPlatform::OpenCLPlatform(_cl_platform_id*, unsigned long)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x137b): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformInfo'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x13b8): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceIDs'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x13ef): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceIDs'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x15cb): undefined reference to `clCreateContext'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLMain::OpenCLMain()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x17bf): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformIDs'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x17eb): undefined reference to `clGetPlatformIDs'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLDevice::getMaxWorkItemSizes()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1a24): undefined reference to `clGetDeviceInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLProgram::~OpenCLProgram()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1b4e): undefined reference to `clReleaseProgram'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLContext::~OpenCLContext()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1c21): undefined reference to `clReleaseContext'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLContext::loadProgramFromStrings(std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> >)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1e4c): undefined reference to `clCreateProgramWithSource'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1e6e): undefined reference to `clBuildProgram'
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x1ea4): undefined reference to `clGetProgramBuildInfo'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLProgram::getKernel(std::string)':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x2d42): undefined reference to `clCreateKernel'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLKernel::~OpenCLKernel()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0x96c): undefined reference to `clReleaseKernel'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLBuffer::~OpenCLBuffer()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xaec): undefined reference to `clReleaseMemObject'
obj/OpenCLObjects.o: In function `OpenCLCommandQueue::~OpenCLCommandQueue()':
OpenCLObjects.cpp:(.text+0xb6c): undefined reference to `clReleaseCommandQueue'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
-
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
did you try the amd-opencl-dev package (apt-get install amd-opencl-dev)?
-
M7j version of yam miner available. It supports fast CPU mining for PTS, MMC, more mining pools and protocols.
To mine MemoryCoin with yam M7j use provided miner config template named yam-mmc.cfg as a base, check readme.txt for more details.
yam M7j optimised for mining MMC on CPUs with AES-NI support and has 5 different algo variations for HT, non-HT and GPU friendly setups.
yam M7j miner now supports PTS mining at beeeeer and includes fix for Win2003 and other older 64bit systems. Check readme.txt for details.
Download at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jvp4wwek8jpohj7/RlW6hzYqTz
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
http://sdrv.ms/18wfjYX
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1xOOWa
yvg1900
-
(...)
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
Yup, I was about to tell you that... You need to install some OpenCL SDK. AFAIK, you can use NVidia SDK when compiling, since the work is done by the driver, and the protocols are all standard. But I never tried it.
-
(...)
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
Got 480 CPM on amazon g2.2xlarge. Still not as good as cudapts, but getting close!
-
(...)
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
Got 480 CPM on amazon g2.2xlarge. Still not as good as cudapts, but getting close!
What is cudapts cpm there?
-
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
did you try the amd-opencl-dev package (apt-get install amd-opencl-dev)?
Just tried it now and sadly no joy. Installed fine but same errors.
(...)
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
Yup, I was about to tell you that... You need to install some OpenCL SDK. AFAIK, you can use NVidia SDK when compiling, since the work is done by the driver, and the protocols are all standard. But I never tried it.
I installed the AMD APP SDK but again, same set of errors.. Any other pointers? Would love to get your code running.
-
Is there already a compiled version of cudapts for windows available?
-
(...)
I am adapting my version of ptsminer to work with opencl. I can't get the same performance as cudapts yet (on an amazon g2.2xlarge his version gets 550 cpm and mine gets 290 cpm, so lots of room to improve). But you are welcome to try it (on AMD GPUs, for example, where there's no CUDA), and of course, suggest improvements.
https://github.com/girino/ptsminer
Got 480 CPM on amazon g2.2xlarge. Still not as good as cudapts, but getting close!
What is cudapts cpm there?
It's currently about 750-780. 480 is pretty good from OpenCL on Nvidia.
-Dave
-
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
did you try the amd-opencl-dev package (apt-get install amd-opencl-dev)?
Just tried it now and sadly no joy. Installed fine but same errors.
(...)
Edit: After researching it, looks like I need the AMD App SDK. Downloading/installing..
No joy. :(
Yup, I was about to tell you that... You need to install some OpenCL SDK. AFAIK, you can use NVidia SDK when compiling, since the work is done by the driver, and the protocols are all standard. But I never tried it.
I installed the AMD APP SDK but again, same set of errors.. Any other pointers? Would love to get your code running.
have any more luck ? i seem to be in the same boat as you
-
you need to add the SDK to the library path. try running something like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/path/to/SDK/lib
where "/path/to/SDK/lib" is the place where the SDK installed the libOpenCL.so file. On NVidia its
/usr/local/cuda/lib/x86_64/
not sure where AMD installs it.
-
you need to add the SDK to the library path. try running something like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/path/to/SDK/lib
where "/path/to/SDK/lib" is the place where the SDK installed the libOpenCL.so file. On NVidia its
/usr/local/cuda/lib/x86_64/
not sure where AMD installs it.
Sorry I'm still having no luck.. Same set of errors despite setting that environment variable.
-
@r05 try getting the code from the repository again. The makefile.unix was bogus and i corrected it sometime ago (yesterday i think). make sure you are building with:
make -f makefile.unix
Also, the new algorithm is almost 50% faster.
-
@r05 try getting the code from the repository again. The makefile.unix was bogus and i corrected it sometime ago (yesterday i think). make sure you are building with:
make -f makefile.unix
Also, the new algorithm is almost 50% faster.
Compiled after getting a fresh copy from the repo - give me 10 minutes and I'll put the AMD card back in and report back. :)
-
Issues with running the AMD card without an X windows session - my own fault, not that of the application. Standby, I will feedback to you :)
-
Ok just released cudaPTSwin - Beeeeer - PTS GPU miner for Windows -> https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2311.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2311.0)
Cheers!
-
@r05 try getting the code from the repository again. The makefile.unix was bogus and i corrected it sometime ago (yesterday i think). make sure you are building with:
make -f makefile.unix
Also, the new algorithm is almost 50% faster.
Finally got it to compile, another (different) error:
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** performance improvements by girino
*** if you like, donate:
*** PTS: PkyeQNn1yGV5psGeZ4sDu6nz2vWHTujf4h
*** BTC: 1GiRiNoKznfGbt8bkU1Ley85TgVV7ZTXce
*** thanks to wjchen for SSE4 improvements.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using GPU
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[STATS] 2014-Jan-13 22:33:14 | 0.0 c/m | 0.0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Device: Barts
Device: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
Starting OpenCLMomentum V4
Device: Barts
Max work group size: 256
ERROR: -11, CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE, if there is a failure to build the program executable. This error will be returned if clBuildProgram does not return until the build has completed.
--- Build log ---
▒▒c
--- End log ---
ptsminer: OpenCLObjects.cpp:289: OpenCLProgram* OpenCLContext::loadProgramFromStrings(std::vector<std::basic_string<char> >): Assertion `!error' failed.
Aborted
After some fiddling I now get this error:
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** performance improvements by girino
*** if you like, donate:
*** PTS: PkyeQNn1yGV5psGeZ4sDu6nz2vWHTujf4h
*** BTC: 1GiRiNoKznfGbt8bkU1Ley85TgVV7ZTXce
*** thanks to wjchen for SSE4 improvements.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using GPU
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[STATS] 2014-Jan-13 23:32:40 | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Device: Barts
Device: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
Starting OpenCLMomentum V4
Device: Barts
Max work group size: 256
[STATS] 2014-Jan-13 23:33:10 | 0.0 c/m | 0.0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
ERROR: -5, CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES, if there is a failure to allocate resources required by the OpenCL implementation on the device.
ptsminer: OpenCLObjects.cpp:421: _cl_event* OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueKernel1D(OpenCLKernel*, size_t, size_t, _cl_event**, size_t): Assertion `_MY_ERR_X == 0' failed.
-
Ok, first error is easy and should be fixed on the repository. AMD SDK does not like "#pragma unroll (8)" directive. Just change all occurrences of this to just "#pragma unroll" in file opencl/OpenCLMomentumV4.cl
The second one seems like lack of memory. What did you change in order for it to happen?
-
try downloading this compiled version (i compiled with NVidia SDK, but should work with AMD as well): http://girino.org/ptsminer/ptsminer-linux-x86_64.tgz
-
yvg1900,
Thank you very much!
My result: AMD FX 8350 (OC 4600Mhz) 345 CPM!
P.S: 7 Thread!
-
yvg1900,
Thank you very much!
My result: AMD FX 8350 (OC 4600Mhz) 345 CPM!
P.S: 7 Thread!
Out of curiosity, would you mind letting me know how this compares to the open source version I just released, if you're mining on beeeeeer? :)
-
yvg1900,
Thank you very much!
My result: AMD FX 8350 (OC 4600Mhz) 345 CPM!
P.S: 7 Thread!
Out of curiosity, would you mind letting me know how this compares to the open source version I just released, if you're mining on beeeeeer? :)
Pts Pool Miner v 0.7 RC 2 = 199.2 c/m
-
yvg1900,
Thank you very much!
My result: AMD FX 8350 (OC 4600Mhz) 345 CPM!
P.S: 7 Thread!
Very nice. What version (for which architecture) and what av do you use?
-
yvg1900,
Thank you very much!
My result: AMD FX 8350 (OC 4600Mhz) 345 CPM!
P.S: 7 Thread!
Very nice. What version (for which architecture) and what av do you use?
yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-bdver1 AV=1
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1928.0
CPU: AMD FX-8350 8-core 4.2GHz (OC 4.80GHz)
RAM: 16 GB DDR3 RAM 2133 Mhz
OS: Windows 7 (64bit)
Software: yam-yvg1900-M7i-win64-bdver1
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): ~ 395-402 (AV=1)
PTS Agg. CPM (1024 MB): 386-390 (AV=2)
-
Ok, first error is easy and should be fixed on the repository. AMD SDK does not like "#pragma unroll (8)" directive. Just change all occurrences of this to just "#pragma unroll" in file opencl/OpenCLMomentumV4.cl
The second one seems like lack of memory. What did you change in order for it to happen?
I reinstalled the AMD drivers from their website directly instead of the Debian repos.
Your precompiled binary says:
libboost_system.so.1.48.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I'm running Debian 7 so I currently have 1.49.0 installed, which would explain the binary not running. I'm still at a loss about the compiled miner, though..
-
@r05: try compiling the older version of the algorithm, which consumes much less memory:
make clean
CFLAGS="-DDEBUG_GPUV3" make -f makefile.unix
and then try several memory amounts from -m 20 (4Mb) to -m 27 (512MB) (default).
If you're still with the same error, I'm lost :( Which graphics card are you running it on? How much RAM on your machine?
-
I'm getting this error on Ubuntu 13.10, with AMD App SDK installed:
In file included from CProtoshareProcessor.cpp:10:0:
OpenCLMomentumV3.h:17:23: fatal error: CL/opencl.h: No such file or directory
#include <CL/opencl.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/CProtoshareProcessor.o] Error 1
How do I install OpenCL SDK?
Thanks in advance.
-
@r05: try compiling the older version of the algorithm, which consumes much less memory:
make clean
CFLAGS="-DDEBUG_GPUV3" make -f makefile.unix
and then try several memory amounts from -m 20 (4Mb) to -m 27 (512MB) (default).
If you're still with the same error, I'm lost :( Which graphics card are you running it on? How much RAM on your machine?
I've removed the AMD card for now as I'm putting another nVidia in, but I will test again later tonight for you.
AMD Radeon HD6870, Debian 7, 4GB total RAM, Intel Core2Quad Q9550.
-
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?
Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
-
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?
Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.
beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.
It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.
In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.
It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.
-
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?
Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.
beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.
It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.
In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.
It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.
Yeah, the way will be to continue drinking beer ...
I went to see other pools and are in the same way seems.
I know that. But it is not just happening in beeeeer. The others are too slow ...
What I found odd was that even before he had more PTS per block and it is falling faster.
Thanks!
-
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?
Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.
beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.
It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.
In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.
It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.
Yeah, the way will be to continue drinking beer ...
I went to see other pools and are in the same way seems.
I know that. But it is not just happening in beeeeer. The others are too slow ...
What I found odd was that even before he had more PTS per block and it is falling faster.
Thanks!
A certain pool *cough*ypool*cough* is dominating the PTS pools with it's absurd amount of miners. All the smaller pools are suffering because of it and with the advent of GPU mining, it just means they maintain their stronghold. Pools like rpool and 1gh are in the same boat as they have similar miner numbers as beer.
And yes you are correct - the only way to resolve this is to drink more beer... :)
-
Can anybody also realized the slowness is that pool?
Last block.
41961 01/14/2014 11:01:40
If you look through this thread you'll notice that plenty of people have noticed that.
beer has good and bad days, like any pool. Just because we are slow in finding a block does not mean you get paid less. You get a share equal to the work you put in just like any other pool.
It could be thought like this:
- It takes 20 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $1,000 for their work. It takes 10 days to build this car and sell it.
- It takes 10 men (or women) to build a car and sell it for $20,000. Each man (or woman) gets paid $2,000 for their work, but now it takes 20 days to built the car and sell it because there are less people working on it.
In the first scenario, the men (or women) would each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $1,000 / 10 = $100.
In the second scenario, the men (or women) would also each get $100 a day (or that equivalent) - $2,000 / 20 = $100.
It takes longer to find a block than the larger pools because we don't have as many miners. But having less miners pays better per block because we don't have to share out the block reward to as many other miners as the big pools.
Yeah, the way will be to continue drinking beer ...
I went to see other pools and are in the same way seems.
I know that. But it is not just happening in beeeeer. The others are too slow ...
What I found odd was that even before he had more PTS per block and it is falling faster.
Thanks!
A certain pool *cough*ypool*cough* is dominating the PTS pools with it's absurd amount of miners. All the smaller pools are suffering because of it and with the advent of GPU mining, it just means they maintain their stronghold. Pools like rpool and 1gh are in the same boat as they have similar miner numbers as beer.
And yes you are correct - the only way to resolve this is to drink more beer... :)
Yeah * cough * cough * but has 6% fee...
And I with 3 VPS 8vCores and 50GB of ram each sieve there ...
It was a test did not yield anything to me and I lost $ $
I'd rather stay where I am for a long time by the way. Here!
Let's drink more beeeeer
-
I'm getting this error on Ubuntu 13.10, with AMD App SDK installed:
In file included from CProtoshareProcessor.cpp:10:0:
OpenCLMomentumV3.h:17:23: fatal error: CL/opencl.h: No such file or directory
#include <CL/opencl.h>
^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/CProtoshareProcessor.o] Error 1
How do I install OpenCL SDK?
Thanks in advance.
you should install the opencl-headers packages from ubuntu:
sudo apt-get install opencl-headers
-
(...)
I've removed the AMD card for now as I'm putting another nVidia in, but I will test again later tonight for you.
AMD Radeon HD6870, Debian 7, 4GB total RAM, Intel Core2Quad Q9550.
I did some new adjustments to the code. Now you can invoke the different versions of the algorithm from the command line by using: "-a gpuv2", "-a gpuv3" or "-a gpuv4".
gpuv2 is the less memory intensive. Try it with a small -m param ("-m 25" should do, my geforce 6400 accepts up to "-m 26").
Are you running 32 or 64 bit OS? My GeForce is on a 32bit ubuntu 12.04, and is the only GPU that complains about memory. I'm thinking maybe it's a memory addressing problem. Will try to instal a 64 bit OS there tonight.
-
hi, when trying to run the make command after using cmake with cygwin i get the following error:
(im using Win7 and have an ATI graphics card)
Linking CXX executable ptsminer.exe
CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o:main_poolminer.cpp:(.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x3b): undefined reference to `CProtoshareProcessor::CProtoshareProcessor(SHAMODE, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o:main_poolminer.cpp:(.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x3b): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `CProtoshareProcessor::CProtoshareProcessor(SHAMODE, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.8.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o: bad reloc address 0x4c in section `.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]'
any idea?
thx alot
P.S. you can contact me directly via mich431mail-bitshares@yahoo.com
-
beeeeer.org and affiliates are not responsible for any damage caused by increased consume of alcohol or similiar substances
:o
-
hi, when trying to run the make command after using cmake with cygwin i get the following error:
(im using Win7 and have an ATI graphics card)
Linking CXX executable ptsminer.exe
CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o:main_poolminer.cpp:(.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x3b): undefined reference to `CProtoshareProcessor::CProtoshareProcessor(SHAMODE, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o:main_poolminer.cpp:(.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]+0x3b): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `CProtoshareProcessor::CProtoshareProcessor(SHAMODE, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.8.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/ptsminer.dir/src/main_poolminer.cpp.o: bad reloc address 0x4c in section `.text$_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi[_ZN13CWorkerThread8mineloopE7SHAMODEi]'
any idea?
thx alot
P.S. you can contact me directly via mich431mail-bitshares@yahoo.com
you shouldn't use cmake. These are left over files from the original project that i failed to remove. Just choose your OS and run:
linux:
make -f makefile.unix
OSX
make -f makefile.osx
Windows with cygwin64
make -f makefile.cygwin
The other files are not currently supported.
-
hi again - sorry im total noob in this... now i get another error (cygwin - win 7 64 - amd sdk installed):
$ make -f makefile.cygwin
g++ -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/CProtoshareProcessor.o obj/AbstractMomentum.o obj/OpenCLMomentum2.o obj/OpenCLMomentumV3.o obj/OpenCLMomentumV4.o obj/OpenCLObjects.o obj/sha_utils.o obj/fileutils.o obj/sha2.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system-mt -l boost_filesystem-mt -l boost_program_options-mt -l boost_thread-mt -l boost_chrono-mt -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread -L/opt/AMD_SDK/lib/x86_64 -lOpenCL
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.8.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: Fehler: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück
makefile.cygwin:156: recipe for target 'ptsminer' failed
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
any idea?
thanks for your time
-
just curious whats the best CPU miner around?
-
just curious whats the best CPU miner around?
Depends a little on your hardware.
Windows: Probably the latest version of yam m7j
https://mega.co.nz/#F!h0tkXSxZ!f62uoUXogkxQmP2xO8Ib-g
Linux/Mac: Either yam or
https://bitbucket.org/dave_andersen/ptsminer
(you have to compile ptsminer yourself)
I believe yam is still faster on bigger multi-CPU machines, but it's binary only. The new version of yam can mine on beeeeeer, where older versions couldn't, so be sure to get m4j if you try it. My ptsminer mines only on beeeeeeeeeeer for now.
-Dave
-
hi again - sorry im total noob in this... now i get another error (cygwin - win 7 64 - amd sdk installed):
$ make -f makefile.cygwin
g++ -o ptsminer obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/CProtoshareProcessor.o obj/AbstractMomentum.o obj/OpenCLMomentum2.o obj/OpenCLMomentumV3.o obj/OpenCLMomentumV4.o obj/OpenCLObjects.o obj/sha_utils.o obj/fileutils.o obj/sha2.o obj/main_poolminer.o -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system-mt -l boost_filesystem-mt -l boost_program_options-mt -l boost_thread-mt -l boost_chrono-mt -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread -L/opt/AMD_SDK/lib/x86_64 -lOpenCL
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/4.8.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: Fehler: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück
makefile.cygwin:156: recipe for target 'ptsminer' failed
make: *** [ptsminer] Error 1
any idea?
thanks for your time
Needs to set the lib path correctly. Either
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/cygdrive/c/path/to/SDK/lib/x86_64
where /path/to/SDK points to the folder where the SDK is installed, or (what i did):
ln -s /cygdrive/c/path/to/SDK /opt/AMD_SDK
-
thx - got it compiled now, but when running it i get segmentation faults ... what am i doing wrong? :)
i get this no matter what pool or options im using - as long as the host is not correct and a connection can not be made there is no segmentation fault... but once it should start working it exits with this segmentation fault
-
fyi
i added a few links on the homepage to the new gpu/cuda/cpu miners out there (thx to crz & dga!)
- xolokram
ps. let me know if i'm missing something...
pps. i'm also trying to completely integrate the pts pool data to the new (beta) pages of beeeeer.org within the next days
-
so with all these cpu and gpu miners, are we getting any blocks today? :D
-
so with all these cpu and gpu miners, are we getting any blocks today? :D
2 or 3 this morning.. Hoping for another before midnight. :-[
-
I mined this pool for more than 2 months, damn no regret!
-
I mined this pool for more than 2 months, damn no regret!
Get this man a drink!
-
I mined this pool for more than 2 months, damn no regret!
Get this man a drink!
Get THIS man a drink, damn!
Edit: (http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/44916155.jpg)
;D ;D ;D
-
@girino
During the compiling process I received some warnings
format/%d0 expects argument of type /int0
several times. The program finishes compiling and will run. It receives work from beeeeer but when the STATS come up they are all 0.0's. Any suggestions?
-
@girino
During the compiling process I received some warnings
format/%d0 expects argument of type /int0
several times. The program finishes compiling and will run. It receives work from beeeeer but when the STATS come up they are all 0.0's. Any suggestions?
wait some minutes. The openCL code takes some time to compile on AMD cards. I am working on it.
-
@girino
Sorry I'm running on a older Nvidia to test it out as my others are quite busy these days lol.
Its on a GT 220 cuda compute 1.2 512mb ram with proprietary drives from Nvidia.
Thanks for the software/help. :-)
-
@girino
Sorry I'm running on a older Nvidia to test it out as my others are quite busy these days lol.
Its on a GT 220 cuda compute 1.2 512mb ram with proprietary drives from Nvidia.
Thanks for the software/help. :-)
i released a new version that compiles WAY faster on my old nvidia card. And please, there's a new thread for my software. let's move the support there: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2374.0
-
Hello,
i stay two days mining on the pool. I have a FX8350 with 8gb ram, minimg 120collision/min. I see on the forums that people with this processor and ram makes 250collision/min.
I utilize v0.7 with windows 8.1 64 bits.
Config:
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph
Any idea to improve?
thanks
-
Hello,
i stay two days mining on the pool. I have a FX8350 with 8gb ram, minimg 120collision/min. I see on the forums that people with this processor and ram makes 250collision/min.
I utilize v0.7 with windows 8.1 64 bits.
Config:
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph
Any idea to improve?
thanks
Run with avx.
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph >> ptsminer_avx_amd.exe USER 8 27 avx
-
Hello,
i stay two days mining on the pool. I have a FX8350 with 8gb ram, minimg 120collision/min. I see on the forums that people with this processor and ram makes 250collision/min.
I utilize v0.7 with windows 8.1 64 bits.
Config:
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph
Any idea to improve?
thanks
Run with avx.
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph >> ptsminer_avx_amd.exe USER 8 27 avx
I'm a noob, but I tought AVX is intel cpus only?
-
I'm a noob, but I tought AVX is intel cpus only?
No, starting with Bulldozer AMD has it.
-
Hello,
i stay two days mining on the pool. I have a FX8350 with 8gb ram, minimg 120collision/min. I see on the forums that people with this processor and ram makes 250collision/min.
I utilize v0.7 with windows 8.1 64 bits.
Config:
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph
Any idea to improve?
thanks
Run with avx.
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph >> ptsminer_avx_amd.exe USER 8 27 avx
Hello and thanks but not good results, 125collision/min. On 3 days only 0.1 protoshares.
-
server down？
-
it looks alright from my side
miners connected and submitting shares :o
-
@xolokram,
when I try to build ptsminer for win32, I got following error
g++ -m32 -mthreads -w -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-param
eter -DWIN32 -D_WINDOWS -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_WIN
32_WINNT=0x0501 -DWINVER=0x0501 -I"/home/dev/ptsminer-master_src/src" -I"/mingw
/include" -Wl,--dynamicbase -Wl,--nxcompat -Wl,--large-address-aware -o ptsminer
.exe -L"/mingw/lib" obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o
obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -l boost_system-mgw48-mt-d
-1_54 -l boost_filesystem-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l boost_program_options-mgw48-mt-d-1_
54 -l boost_thread-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l boost_chrono-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l kernel32 -
l user32 -l gdi32 -l comdlg32 -l winspool -l winmm -l shell32 -l comctl32 -l ole
32 -l oleaut32 -l uuid -l rpcrt4 -l advapi32 -l ws2_32 -l mswsock -l shlwapi
obj/sha512.o:sha512.c:(.text+0x6): undefined reference to `sha512_avx'
obj/sha512.o:sha512.c:(.text+0x16): undefined reference to `sha512_sse4'
But in obj files, I can see these two function.
dev@EM-PC /home/dev/ptsminer-master_src/src
$ nm obj/sha512_avx.o
00000000 d .data
00000000 t .text
00000001 a @feat.00
00000000 T sha512_avx
dev@EM-PC /home/dev/ptsminer-master_src/src
$ nm obj/sha512_sse4.o
00000000 d .data
00000000 t .text
00000001 a @feat.00
00000000 T sha512_sse4
they are compiled by "yasm -f win32 ..."
Could you tell me what should I change? Thx
-
I'm using crz's cuda miner 0.4 and get around 870 cpm on my gtx 670. Tried mining for ~8 hours, everything seemed to work fine. Now Beeeeer says my balance is 0.1 PTS, but my wallet shows 0. I tried to look into the found blocks, and the blocks shown at beeeeer do not match those at coinplorer.com (44263 for example) ! Are they orphaned blocks or something? I'm new to mining protoshares, so any help will be appreciated.
-
...Now Beeeeer says my balance is 0.1 PTS, but my wallet shows 0. ...
Personal payouts are executed, when you reach at least 0.2 pts
Not sure what you mean by the block don't match, though.
Any orphaned blocks will show as "orphaned" in the list of blocks on your stats page.
-
Personal payouts are executed, when you reach at least 0.2 pts
Thanks for pointing this out! Somehow I managed to miss this even though it is written on the first page of this thread in bold red :-[
-
@bizthinker:
hard to tell, from what i see it looks alright
you're sure the yasm win32 compiled files are used?
maybe u can PM me the complete compile log?
- xolokram
-
Hello trying to mine but can't seem to connect. Can someone help me?
ptsminer_amd.exe xxxxxxx 16 26 sph
11] GoGoGo!
2] GoGoGo!
[WORKER1] GoGoGo!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
15] Hello, World!] GoGoGo!
[WORKER[WORKER5] GoGoGo!
15[WORKERno connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds] GoGoGo!10
] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
-
it looks alright from my side
miners connected and submitting shares :o
it's due to my network connection .......
-
Mine just don't want to connect. Is there anything I need to do with my connection?
-
@bongo - I'm connected with multiple clients and all is fine. It has to be on your end. Check firewalls and the like
Xolo - I've been mining solid and somehow do not show up in the payouts for the last two blocks:
44828 2014-01-24 13:53:29
44817 2014-01-24 12:37:27
Sorry to be a burden, just wondered what's going on and if I'm doing anything wrong. I stopped my clients and restarted. Wallet addy:
PvGgzTKX7GdsnrqkwPXoEDG3ustv6BXAyt
You'll notice i'm in the payouts in the blocks before them. Let me know if I need to do something different.
Thanks.
EDIT: One thing I did change earlier in the day (no idea which block I was in) but I did start using v.7 of the 64bit client.
ptsminer_amd.exe PvGgzTKX7GdsnrqkwPXoEDG3ustv6BXAyt 5 30
-
hi,
i checked the pool setup and log, there's nothing blocking your address or your ip (i checked the last ip that connected to the pool with the payout address).
the last pool restart was a few days ago. so i'm a little bit puzzled.
if no shares are in the block information, then no shares have been submitted for that payout address :(
are you sure your machines are mining and submitting valid shares???
what's the source (url / link / post) for the miner software you're using or is it the official one i'm distributing??
- xolokram
-
Thanks for the prompt reply. I have been using your ptsminer v.05 64 bit edition for a couple of days now. Found it here:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/w1aukecc052a52p/ptsminer_v05a_x64.zip
I switched about 9am (EST) to the ptsminer v.07 64 bit edition. Found it here:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/gezxz50ncr90veg/ptsminer_v07b_x64_bundle.zip
I have a second machine running the 32 bit edition but it barely breaks the 10 valid shares mark in 8 hours so I'm not concerned with it. The main machine I'm using is a 6 core AMD and I have 64Gb RAM. So, I thought the v.07 miner would be more beneficial with my ram set up. So, I switched. However, I noticed I wasn't getting payouts and halted the program and went back to the v.05 miner. Thoughts?
Edit: Yes, I'm getting valid shares. I let it go to about 170 valids, then restart the client as I start to get a lot of rejects. Seems to work out. Or has until now.
-
Can someone help me out here. Im cloud mining and I see collisions and shares submitted but nothing shows up in my user address. http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/PpyJrMVZMMmziN3eAqjkZ3ayoSbwG5V7wt
I used to mine on Linux and all worked fine. But now I have a Windows service running. Do you know what I am doing wrong?
-
if you're first time mining on beeeer you'll have to wait until we find the next block to see you shares bound to that block (the current round).
@nojle:
ok, these are the correct links / downloads.
i dont have a clue what's wrong with your mining. either we wait until the next block, or you go back check your miner setup, maybe there's a typo in the address or something? srsly this is strange. btw and fyi: the times on the stats page is UTC, maybe that helps
mh
- xolokram
-
@nojle
@mmao
Thank you for replying. The problem was definitely on my side. I was using the wrong wallet address. Problem resolved. How do i tune it. I am getting just 91 c/m on 8 core amd cpu
-
@bongo: up the threads you're using. I have a six core amd with a horrible fan, so i'm only using 5 threads to keep the temp around 60C. If you're on 64bit windows, the ptsminer lets you set how much ram to allocate. Check out the bottom of the first post on this thread.
If I helped and you feel obliged, please donate to any of 4 in my signature.
Xolo: I show payouts for the last two blocks. Just something weird happened in the two before it. I'll live lol. Thank you for your time. I just wanted to MAKE SURE, it wasn't something major.
-
@xolokram,
following are my comple log. I will appreciate it you can take a look.
$ make -f makefile.mingw
g++ -c -m32 -O3 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -msse4 -msse4.1 -fpermissive -o obj/
cpuid.o cpuid.c
yasm -f win32 -D WINABI -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f win32 -D WINABI -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
g++ -c -m32 -O3 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -msse4 -msse4.1 -fpermissive -o obj/
sha512.o sha512.c
g++ -c -m32 -O3 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -msse4 -msse4.1 -fpermissive -o obj/
sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
sph_sha2.c: In function 'void sph_sha224_init(void*)':
sph_sha2.c:628:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha224_contex
t*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_sha2.c: In function 'void sph_sha256_init(void*)':
sph_sha2.c:643:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha256_contex
t* {aka sph_sha224_context*}' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sha224_short(void*, const void*, size_t)':
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha224_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sph_sha224(void*, const void*, size_t)':
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha224_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'const
unsigned char*' [-fpermissive]
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^
sph_sha2.c:615:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of 'void sha2_round(const u
nsigned char*, sph_u32*)' [-fpermissive]
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sha224_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int,
unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)':
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha224_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
g++ -c -m32 -O3 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -msse4 -msse4.1 -fpermissive -o obj/
sph_sha2big.o sph_sha2big.c
sph_sha2big.c: In function 'void sph_sha384_init(void*)':
sph_sha2big.c:191:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha384_con
text*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_sha2big.c: In function 'void sph_sha512_init(void*)':
sph_sha2big.c:202:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha512_con
text* {aka sph_sha384_context*}' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sha384_short(void*, const void*, size_t)':
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha384_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sph_sha384(void*, const void*, size_t)':
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha384_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'const
unsigned char*' [-fpermissive]
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^
sph_sha2big.c:178:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of 'void sha3_round(cons
t unsigned char*, sph_u64*)' [-fpermissive]
sha3_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u64 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function 'void sha384_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int,
unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)':
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'sph_sha384_c
ontext*' [-fpermissive]
sc = cc;
^
g++ -c -m32 -O3 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -msse4 -msse4.1 -m32 -mthreads -w -Wa
ll -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -DWIN32 -D_WINDOWS
-DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 -DWINVER=
0x0501 -I"/home/dev/ptsminer-master_src/src" -I"/mingw/include" -o obj/main_poo
lminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
g++ -m32 -mthreads -w -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-param
eter -DWIN32 -D_WINDOWS -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_WIN
32_WINNT=0x0501 -DWINVER=0x0501 -I"/home/dev/ptsminer-master_src/src" -I"/mingw
/include" -Wl,--dynamicbase -Wl,--nxcompat -Wl,--large-address-aware -o ptsminer
.exe -L"/mingw/lib" obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o
obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o -l boost_system-mgw48-mt-d
-1_54 -l boost_filesystem-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l boost_program_options-mgw48-mt-d-1_
54 -l boost_thread-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l boost_chrono-mgw48-mt-d-1_54 -l kernel32 -
l user32 -l gdi32 -l comdlg32 -l winspool -l winmm -l shell32 -l comctl32 -l ole
32 -l oleaut32 -l uuid -l rpcrt4 -l advapi32 -l ws2_32 -l mswsock -l shlwapi
obj/sha512.o:sha512.c:(.text+0x6): undefined reference to `sha512_avx'
obj/sha512.o:sha512.c:(.text+0x16): undefined reference to `sha512_sse4'
c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.8.1/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.exe: obj/sha512
.o: bad reloc address 0x20 in section `.eh_frame'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ptsminer.exe] Error 1
-
@bizthinker:
the compile process looks good as far as i can tell (except the errors of course).
what versions are you using?
$ g++ -v
Ziel: mingw32
Konfiguriert mit: ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --disable-sjlj-exceptions --w
ith-dwarf2 --enable-shared --enable-libgomp --disable-win32-registry --enable-libstdcxx-debug --disable-build-poststage1
-with-cxx --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --build=mingw32 --prefix=/mingw
Thread-Modell: win32
gcc-Version 4.7.2 (GCC)
$ yasm --version
yasm 1.2.0
Compiled on Oct 31 2011.
- xolokram
-
if anyone else is having issues building for osx, here is what I had to do to get it to build.
1) cd /tmp
2) xcode-select –install
3) sudo xcodebuild -license
4) curl -O https://distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
5) tar xf MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
6) cd MacPorts-2.2.1/
7) ./configure
8) make
9) sudo make install
10) sudo port selfupdate
11) sudo port install boost db48@+no_java openssl miniupnpc (this takes awhile, almost an hour)
12) git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
13) cd ptsminer/src
14) make –f makefile.osx
Edit: one of my co-workers needed to download the command line tool for Xcode. So if step 2 doesn't work, that maybe why.
I got all the way to step 14 but then when I run that command I get the error "make: *** No rule to make target `–f'. Stop." I have no idea what the problem is and I have Googled everywhere but I cannot find the answer. Can someone please help me? I'm willing to pay in protoshares when I can get this to work. Thanks!
-
if anyone else is having issues building for osx, here is what I had to do to get it to build.
1) cd /tmp
2) xcode-select –install
3) sudo xcodebuild -license
4) curl -O https://distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
5) tar xf MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
6) cd MacPorts-2.2.1/
7) ./configure
8) make
9) sudo make install
10) sudo port selfupdate
11) sudo port install boost db48@+no_java openssl miniupnpc (this takes awhile, almost an hour)
12) git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
13) cd ptsminer/src
14) make –f makefile.osx
Edit: one of my co-workers needed to download the command line tool for Xcode. So if step 2 doesn't work, that maybe why.
I got all the way to step 14 but then when I run that command I get the error "make: *** No rule to make target `–f'. Stop." I have no idea what the problem is and I have Googled everywhere but I cannot find the answer. Can someone please help me? I'm willing to pay in protoshares when I can get this to work. Thanks!
You have a long dash in '-f'. Type the minus on your keyboard instead of it.
-
if anyone else is having issues building for osx, here is what I had to do to get it to build.
1) cd /tmp
2) xcode-select –install
3) sudo xcodebuild -license
4) curl -O https://distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
5) tar xf MacPorts-2.2.1.tar.bz2
6) cd MacPorts-2.2.1/
7) ./configure
8) make
9) sudo make install
10) sudo port selfupdate
11) sudo port install boost db48@+no_java openssl miniupnpc (this takes awhile, almost an hour)
12) git clone https://github.com/thbaumbach/ptsminer
13) cd ptsminer/src
14) make –f makefile.osx
Edit: one of my co-workers needed to download the command line tool for Xcode. So if step 2 doesn't work, that maybe why.
I got all the way to step 14 but then when I run that command I get the error "make: *** No rule to make target `–f'. Stop." I have no idea what the problem is and I have Googled everywhere but I cannot find the answer. Can someone please help me? I'm willing to pay in protoshares when I can get this to work. Thanks!
You have a long dash in '-f'. Type the minus on your keyboard instead of it.
well that worked but now i'm getting a different error.
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
make: yasm: No such file or directory
make: *** [obj/sha512_avx.o] Error 1
I think it means that I have to install Yasm but I'm not exactly sure how to do that so if you could point me in the right direction or give me some tips on doing that it would be appreciated. thanks.
-
well that worked but now i'm getting a different error.
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
make: yasm: No such file or directory
make: *** [obj/sha512_avx.o] Error 1
I think it means that I have to install Yasm but I'm not exactly sure how to do that so if you could point me in the right direction or give me some tips on doing that it would be appreciated. thanks.
'sudo port install yasm' should do the trick
-
well that worked but now i'm getting a different error.
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
make: yasm: No such file or directory
make: *** [obj/sha512_avx.o] Error 1
I think it means that I have to install Yasm but I'm not exactly sure how to do that so if you could point me in the right direction or give me some tips on doing that it would be appreciated. thanks.
'sudo port install yasm' should do the trick
Well after doing all that I'm getting this really confusing error message that I have no idea what it means.
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
llvm-g++ -c -O2 -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
llvm-g++ -c -O1 -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
clang: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this behavior is deprecated
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpermissive'
sph_sha2.c:33:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name
(e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
sph_sha2.c:628:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from incompatible
type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
sph_sha2.c:643:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha256_context *' (aka
'sph_sha224_context *') from incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:79:32: warning: pragma diagnostic expected option name
(e.g. "-Wundef") [-Wunknown-pragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-fpermissive"
^
./sph_md_helper.c:136:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:186:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
./sph_md_helper.c:208:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sha2_round'
RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
^~~~
sph_sha2.c:652:16: note: expanded from macro 'RFUN'
#define RFUN sha2_round
^~~~~~~~~~
sph_sha2.c:615:1: note: candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument
of incomplete type 'const void *' to 'const unsigned char *'
sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:
./sph_md_helper.c:250:5: error: assigning to 'sph_sha224_context *' from
incompatible type 'void *'
sc = cc;
^ ~~
2 warnings and 6 errors generated.
make: *** [obj/sph_sha2.o] Error 1
-
@xolokram,
my environment
gcc version 4.8.1 (GCC)
yasm 1.2.0
I used nm to check the .o file. I see the functions are there. Very strange. Could you help compile a Win32&SSE4 version and send to me? I have dozens of old servers are blocked on this. My email: bizthinker@qq.com. Thanks in advance.
-
I started mining about 12 hours ago with ptsminer on Debian 64. Successfully submitted about 1000 some odd shares until it crashed at some point while I was asleep. I understand there is a 120 block latency but I am only seeing 3 shares so far under my user page. does it take longer than 12 hours to update?
-
@Michael
I think on user page you see your pts, not shares.
In the last 12 hours peeeer.org seems found 4 - 5 blocks so for you 3 blocks is all right.
-
@bizthinker:
i'm sorry, i just went through the asm code and it requires 64bit compilation, my bad --- didn't recognized that before :-[
- xolokram
-
:) I see. anyway, thanks for your efforts
-
i just added a few links to the (crappy) webpage for some (all?) of the third-party miners out there
linux/cpu/avx2: dga's cpu miner (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2293.0)
linux/gpu/cuda: dga's cuda miner (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2114.msg24789#msg24789)
windows/gpu/cuda: crz's cuda build for windows (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2311.0)
win&linux&osx/gpu/opencl: girino's opencl build/code (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2374.0)
cheers.
- xolokram
-
@nojle
Thank you. Something coming your way. :)
-
Could someone give me a hand with CentOS 6_64x?
I set up with Ubuntu, but I have a server that uses centOS and as I'm not using all his power, going back to mine PTS.
= D
Regards,
Sadrachss
-
how can i see the hash-speed of the pool?
Edit: "spm" at the website - shares per minute?
-
yep, spm = shares per minute
but i don't know how comparable this is, as this is depending on the share target of every pool
-
So
I think I've noticed a bug in the Beeeer.org Systats. The bug is any XPM credited in the Zero Hour, That is between Midnight and 1:00 am GMT, does not get counted in the XPM/Hour calculation.
So here I am waiting till the midnight hour, and no joy.
I'm guessing noone has noticed this before, because I'm good at this stuff ;)
-
I've developed a very fast OpenCL PTS miner for AMD GPUs, e.g. I get about 2300 cpm on a single R9 290@1025mhz. Version v0.1.x connects to beeeeer.org. More information can be found in the following thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2598
-
i have around 200 machines mining primecoins right now, wanted to check if PTS are more profitable but since version 0.4 of w32 miner there's no 'ip' option.
those machines don't have net connection so i need to forward it through my comp with port forwarder.
is it possible with w32 miner higher than 4.0 ? if not where can i get 4.0 miner?
cheers
-
i have around 200 machines mining primecoins right now, wanted to check if PTS are more profitable but since version 0.4 of w32 miner there's no 'ip' option.
those machines don't have net connection so i need to forward it through my comp with port forwarder.
is it possible with w32 miner higher than 4.0 ? if not where can i get 4.0 miner?
cheers
PTS would be unprofitable using CPU let alone 32 bit
-
yup
pts is dominated by gpu
-
i have around 200 machines mining primecoins right now, wanted to check if PTS are more profitable but since version 0.4 of w32 miner there's no 'ip' option.
those machines don't have net connection so i need to forward it through my comp with port forwarder.
is it possible with w32 miner higher than 4.0 ? if not where can i get 4.0 miner?
cheers
PTS would be unprofitable using CPU let alone 32 bit
Unprofitable is relative. If you already own the CPU, it's power-profitable on a good CPU, but 32 bit is out of the question. I mine on my home computer, and it earns about $2.40 of PTS per day on about $0.24 of power. (Admittedly, that's with a haswell/avx2 CPU and my latest miner for it).
But ugh 32 bit. Very few devs want to try to support it any more, and good riddance.
-
server under maintenance atm
sorry for the inconvenvience
done, i changed the share target to reduce the server workload.
shares/min will decrease, col/min & payout/day won't! just fyi.
- xolokram
-
Here is still not connecting ...
[WORKER13] GoGoGo!
[WORKER14] GoGoGo!
[WORKER15] GoGoGo!
[WORKER16] GoGoGo!
[WORKER17] GoGoGo!
[WORKER18] GoGoGo!
[WORKER19] GoGoGo!
[WORKER20] GoGoGo!
[WORKER21] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
no connection to the server, reconnecting in 10 seconds
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
system:111
-
now server is back
-
me too failed to connect
Agora foi!
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 00ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[WORKER] collision found: 38981803 <-> 44177352 #34 @ 1391531119 by 7
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Feb-04 16:25:22 | 170.0 c/m | 5.0 sh/m | VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[WORKER] collision found: 56451998 <-> 7280068 #510 @ 1391531344 by 16
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Feb-04 16:26:41 | 536.3 c/m | 1.3 sh/m | VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
EDIT.
Fully working!
-
yeah, it should be ok now. thx to the guy on irc, whoever you are/were. :)
-
It's up and seems found 1 blocks in 10 min.
-
server under maintenance atm
sorry for the inconvenvience
done, i changed the share target to reduce the server workload.
shares/min will decrease, col/min & payout/day won't! just fyi.
- xolokram
Wow you weren't kidding... 1/5th the sh/m now... I'm guessing a lot of folks have come over recently as my payouts have shrunk per share, granted more blocks found so it seems to even out?
-
?
your payout won't be affected by the shares-target-changes i've made recently! and the pool hasn't found a block since, so you can't judge this by now anyway.
the cause for changes in payouts over last days/weeks is the effect of competition regarding the efficiency of the miner software out there. i don't know what hardware you're using, but there's opencl & cuda optimized gpu mining software for pts out there.
- xolokram
-
?
your payout won't be affected by the shares-target-changes i've made recently! and the pool hasn't found a block since, so you can't judge this by now anyway.
the cause for changes in payouts over last days/weeks is the effect of competition regarding the efficiency of the miner software out there. i don't know what hardware you're using, but there's opencl & cuda optimized gpu mining software for pts out there.
- xolokram
going from this...
46602 2014-01-30 22:03:09 13253 / 1084416 -> 0.18500 PTS / 15.14 PTS -> added
to this...
47967 2014-02-04 09:47:39 15645 / 2137928 -> 0.11087 PTS / 15.15 PTS -> PAID
same cpm in both instances... but the average PTS per block has dropped almost in half over the last 5 days... I was attributing it to a large increase of people joining the pool... hence, more blocks, but lower payouts per block? but it averages out with more blocks found? or am I not reading any of this correctly?
so basically where I was getting .18500 pts per found block, now with the same cpm, I only get .11087 pts per block? so half the pay for the same work, but in theory we'll find more blocks so it averages out?
-
i don't know what hardware you're using, but there's opencl & cuda optimized gpu mining software for pts out there.
you have to compete with GPUs and different implementations (OpenCL/CUDA/etc.pp.)
it's likely that more efficient miners or software are "eating" your "missing" part of the payout
increased # of miners or found blocks won't help you with that
i guess you're missing the connected problem of increased difficulty that arise with the new efficient gpu implementations
-
i don't know what hardware you're using, but there's opencl & cuda optimized gpu mining software for pts out there.
you have to compete with GPUs and different implementations (OpenCL/CUDA/etc.pp.)
it's likely that more efficient miners or software are "eating" your "missing" part of the payout
increased # of miners or found blocks won't help you with that
i guess you're missing the connected problem of increased difficulty that arise with the new efficient gpu implementations
But what I am asking... has the number of "cpm" on the pool, almost doubled in the past 5 days... I am trying to understand the information displayed in the line...
from what I understand...
46833 2014-01-31 16:07:17 30838 / 2546117 -> 0.18334 PTS / 15.14 PTS -> PAID
means on 2014-01-31 I did 30838 shares out of 2546117 total pool shares for block 46833 correct? so I was roughly 1.2% of total pool cpm, so I get 1.2% of the 15.14 PTS so .18334 pts...
now looking today at....
48086 2014-02-04 17:40:20 965 / 131346 -> 0.11180 PTS / 15.22 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
means on 2014-02-04 I did 965 shares out of 131346 total pool shares for block 48086 correct? so I was roughly 0.07% of the total pool cpm, so I get 0.07% of the 15.22 PTS so .11180 pts...
so am I correctly reading this, and understand, that over the past 5 days the number of people using this pool, and total pool cpm rate, has almost doubled? (irregardless of which method they are using to create cpm, just the overall cpm rate has increased that much?)
in theory, more cpm for the entire pool, means more blocks will be found, however they will each be a lower payout as its now spread out among more cpm... but averaging out, more blocks despite being lower pay, would ultimately equate the same level of pay as before... in theory...
english as a second language sometimes makes words used different than my language, so I am trying to make sure I understand things correctly.
-
...
in theory, more cpm for the entire pool, means more blocks will be found, however they will each be a lower payout as its now spread out among more cpm... but averaging out, more blocks despite being lower pay, would ultimately equate the same level of pay as before... in theory...
this would be true, when the overall power of the network wouldn't increase, but just the pool
but
that's not the case. with the new implementations for GPUs the overall network power has increased.
thus the difficulty was increasing to let the network stay at the desired block rate (there are not more blocks found!!)
thus the number of shares needed to find a block has increased too
thus you proportion of the overall network, which is the most important indicator for your payout, is decreasing (if you're still using the same miner/hardware)
i hope that was helpful. :)
- xolokram
-
...
in theory, more cpm for the entire pool, means more blocks will be found, however they will each be a lower payout as its now spread out among more cpm... but averaging out, more blocks despite being lower pay, would ultimately equate the same level of pay as before... in theory...
this would be true, when the overall power of the network wouldn't increase, but just the pool
but
that's not the case. with the new implementations for GPUs the overall network power has increased.
thus the difficulty was increasing to let the network stay at the desired block rate (there are not more blocks found!!)
thus the number of shares needed to find a block has increased too
thus you proportion of the overall network, which is the most important indicator for your payout, is decreasing (if you're still using the same miner/hardware)
i hope that was helpful. :)
- xolokram
it helps some thank you... when I say find more blocks, I do not mean faster than intended by design (which if I remember is every 5min?)... I mean the pool with more cpm has a higher better statistical chance to find that block than if say we there were half the cpm total for the pool...
100,000,000 cpm = more likely to find block and 50,000,000 cpm = less likely to find the same block... still chance for either, just more likely with more cpm...
-
yup
pts is dominated by gpu
It sure is. Unless you have access to free cores/electricity or you own a very powerful CPU, then mining PTS won't earn you many PTS at all.
The good thing about the fastest GPU miner (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2598.0) is that it points to beer. Getting over 8000 CPM with 4x 280X.
Oh, and thanks for still hanging in there and providing this pool for us with big brother being...SO much bigger. We're still chugging away and finding blocks, and more PTS can be earned at beer mainly because of generously low fees compared to other pools. Thanks! 8)
...
in theory, more cpm for the entire pool, means more blocks will be found, however they will each be a lower payout as its now spread out among more cpm... but averaging out, more blocks despite being lower pay, would ultimately equate the same level of pay as before... in theory...
this would be true, when the overall power of the network wouldn't increase, but just the pool
but
that's not the case. with the new implementations for GPUs the overall network power has increased.
thus the difficulty was increasing to let the network stay at the desired block rate (there are not more blocks found!!)
thus the number of shares needed to find a block has increased too
thus you proportion of the overall network, which is the most important indicator for your payout, is decreasing (if you're still using the same miner/hardware)
i hope that was helpful. :)
- xolokram
Yeah, spot on. Obviously it may also affect the value of PTS. Hopefully in a positive way. ;)
-
Hello!
PTC decided to take prey with the aid of Digital ocean. Did everything in accordance with the instructions on the site http://protoshares.com/mining.html # dac. Putty displays a message [MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 00ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
What does this mean?
-
It means that everythig is working and that you participate in the pool.
-
Hello,
Can i run on multi ptsminer with the same pay out address on multi server ? because the first run under 1 server is fast but after running on multi server the [STATS] show longer ?
Also please help me with 2 question in picture below because i'm not clearly about these result
(http://upload.vhost.vn/images/190923pts3.png)
Thanks,
-
collisions are what we're searching for, so this is ok, it means it's working/mining
the col/minute value is an indicator for your miner's performance and it's depending on your hardware, thus it's hard to tell if this is ok or not
btw. regarding the used software: there are other cpu / gpu miners out there (third party miners) that are more efficient than 0.7 RC2 fyi
- xolokram
-
pool down?
-
pool down?
>
Yes it is down.
stats:
{
"spm": 0,
"online": true
}
-
The pool is down.
-
hi,
thx for the information, i'm working on it. sry for the late reply.
pool should be fine again. i'm sorry for the inconvencience.
- xolokram
-
Hi all! Is the stats web page working?
Edit: it showedup now, but it marks all the blocks waiting for confirmations, even the one's that already were confirmed.
-
yeah, the webpage has some problems, i guess it has something to do with the fu-- up yesterday.
pool is running fine though.
alternatively you could use the current beta stats: http://beta.beeeeer.org/ or http://pts.syware.de/
but it's work-in-progress (@beta), thus not all features are in there (e.g. unconfirmed blocks for your personal stats)
i'm currently not at a pc to check the webpage server, but i'll asap.
i'm sorry for the inconvenience... again. :-X
- xolokram
-
Mining's working again, but there are no stats for my user :/
-
yeah, the webpage has some problems, i guess it has something to do with the fu-- up yesterday.
pool is running fine though.
alternatively you could use the current beta stats: http://beta.beeeeer.org/ or http://pts.syware.de/
but it's work-in-progress (@beta), thus not all features are in there (e.g. unconfirmed blocks for your personal stats)
i'm currently not at a pc to check the webpage server, but i'll asap.
i'm sorry for the inconvenience... again. :-X
- xolokram
I think we all understand, so don't worry. The important thing is that the pool is running without issues. Thanks for your hard work Xolo! :)
-
i still cannot see totals or even updates in my stats. anyone else still having the same problems?
-
@mining:
your stats on beeeeer's beta page are clearly updated, just like i told you via PM
but i understand, that those stats are ugly, as these are not 100% implemented yet (i didnt really wanted to see them in the public, but the old webserver with the old stats is fu--ed and i would like tp concentrate on the new stats than on the old stats, but that's another story)
anyway
sy's stats seem to have some problem atm, i'll try to talk to him on irc about this
- xolokram
-
@xolokram
i cant see the running total. all i can see is a list and when i click on the latest one, my wallet number doesnt appear in that list. if you are seeing my total and i am not, i dont know what i am doing wrong. it was fine before the server went down, so i dont know :/
-
I'm pretty new to all this mining-stuff, so can someone explain this to me?
Actually i'm mining with about 12000cpm.
Yesterday i got 0.29 PTS out of one block on which I had ~180 Shares (that took like 5 Minutes.. lol..) and today i got 0.19 PTS out of one block on which I had ~24000 Shares.
I can see in the Blockinfo that this Block needed 1685375 Shares (I Think thats the info out of the "shares_sum"?) and the one yesterday only 8408. But how can this happen? They got the exact same Difficulty and the (more or less) same reward... thats makes absoluteley no sense for me... thanks to that there were only ~8 Blocks solved today vs. ~16 yesterday and this directly affects my wallet :/
-
@beatfried:
the payout barrier on beeeeer's PTS pool is 0.2 PTS, thus if you earn more than 0.2 PTS per block you'll be paid immediately per block (ok with a few minutes of delay due to the technical implementation)
@mining:
that's because there's currently no total-balance-info on the beta pages! but you could use a calculator and/or estimate it on your own, or write a batch script or just wait until the next "PAID" pops up
on the other hand: i talked to Sy, he'll look into that problem with his stats, looks like something was screwed on his data due to the server outage :-X
- xolokram
-
@beatfried:
the payout barrier on beeeeer's PTS pool is 0.2 PTS, thus if you earn more than 0.2 PTS per block you'll be paid immediately per block (ok with a few minutes of delay due to the technical implementation)
yeah I know that, but that wasn't my question. I'm asking why one block needed ~8000 Shares and another Block needed ~1600000 Shares.
-
@xolokram
got it. thx :)
-
sorry beatfried, i totally missed that :o
mining --- e.g. bitcoin, litecoins, protoshares, etc.pp. --- means that you're searching values in a pre-defined calculation that meet certain characteristics (often it just means that the solution of a specific calculation needs to be less than a specified value, which is the current/fluctuating "difficulty").
these characteristics often contain a random property (e.g. using a hash function that needs to be calculated).
thus all the miners are doing is "just" a (VERY LARGE) trial-and-error on all possible values to find a value that meets the current target difficult of the network.
thus sometimes a block needs 1.000 shares, sometimes 1.000.000 shares.
- xolokram
ps. i hope that was helpful
pps. i'll redirect the old pts page (ptsweb.beeeeer.org) to the beta pages (beta.beeeeer.org) soon®
-
Who can tell me the horsepower of this pool? :D
-
Hi,
Could someone confirm that mining with this pool is still working?
My miners appear to be running and submitting shares, but the 2 new beta stats pages only show stats that stop on 13.02.2014 - does this mean that no blocks have been mined in the last 4 days, or that the stats are wrong?
EDIT - from looking at the blockchain, it looks like I got a payment on 16.02.2014, so i guess mining is still working, but the stats aren't updating?
-
sorry beatfried, i totally missed that :o
mining --- e.g. bitcoin, litecoins, protoshares, etc.pp. --- means that you're searching values in a pre-defined calculation that meet certain characteristics (often it just means that the solution of a specific calculation needs to be less than a specified value, which is the current/fluctuating "difficulty").
these characteristics often contain a random property (e.g. using a hash function that needs to be calculated).
thus all the miners are doing is "just" a (VERY LARGE) trial-and-error on all possible values to find a value that meets the current target difficult of the network.
thus sometimes a block needs 1.000 shares, sometimes 1.000.000 shares.
- xolokram
ps. i hope that was helpful
pps. i'll redirect the old pts page (ptsweb.beeeeer.org) to the beta pages (beta.beeeeer.org) soon®
thank you man for the explanation!
that made many things so much clearer :D
-
Hi,
Could someone confirm that mining with this pool is still working?
My miners appear to be running and submitting shares, but the 2 new beta stats pages only show stats that stop on 13.02.2014 - does this mean that no blocks have been mined in the last 4 days, or that the stats are wrong?
EDIT - from looking at the blockchain, it looks like I got a payment on 16.02.2014, so i guess mining is still working, but the stats aren't updating?
http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=raw&m=blk&s=pts
I use the above link to check recent blocks, to see when we last found something... then I click on each block and hit F3 in my web browser to search for my PTS address, it will have two entries, the first will show how many shares, the second will tell me the payout (after its a confirmed block)...
the "personal stats" link only showed confirmed blocks you have been paid for... not blocks we are waiting for confirmations on yet, they could still become orphans! (sad face)
-
Hi,
I've started a stats page, on which there isn't much so far, but you can see your unpaid blocks:
http://mypts.eu.org/
I will add features as time permits.
-
Feature added: tx confirmation status :)
-
thank you, justmwa. you're now featured on the "webpage" ::) or that mess that was once the webpage :D donated, buy yourself a beer :)
- xolokram
ps. i'll try to enhance the beta pages (there are really bad atm regarding PTS, sorry :( ) once i'm done with the primeminer
pps. @Raiden: fluctuating 3-5% of the network
-
Thanks xolokram! Also for making mining worth it 8)
On a more technical note, why isn't txcount increasing when polling blocks? Isn't it the same as confirmations? And if you know of another blockchain checker than coinplorer which has no API to query.. Not that grabbing an https URL isn't working but it could be cleaner/lighter on their ressources =)
-
transaction count is the # of transactions in that block, it's fixed and fluctuating from block to block, it has nothing to do with the height or confirmations.
i'm using coinplorer if i have to check something atm.
- xolokram
-
Stats update:
Added: your shares/min (that was a tricky one!)
a link to your coinplorer.com.
Upcoming: daily stats (both your personal ones and the pool's).
-
Stats update:
-replace block shares with pool shares/min (anyone noticed today's +20% increase? certainly explaining the reduced payout but more blocks found)
-added total pending PTS
-orphan blocks are now removed asap
-added last 100 confirmed blocks
-
I just noticed that now it's only 120 blocks to confirm, is it right or am I confused?
-
Stats update:
-added exchange rates (refreshed every 30min from cryptsy.com and localbitcoins.com).
-added pending value in USD and EUR.
-
Stats update:
-added exchange rates (refreshed every 30min from cryptsy.com and localbitcoins.com).
-added pending value in USD and EUR.
Thx for your great work! Maybe with some lines (spaces) in between would look just more readable? :) Just a suggestion ;)
-
sorry if thats a stupid question, but, where do you get all that stats from?
but thanks for your work! the stats are really nice!
I didn't notice a increse in sh/m, i got 20% less then yesterday :/
-
Stats update:
-replace block shares with pool shares/min (anyone noticed today's +20% increase? certainly explaining the reduced payout but more blocks found)
-added total pending PTS
-orphan blocks are now removed asap
-added last 100 confirmed blocks
is it possible to actually leave orphan blocks in and flag them as such... I always liked having the whole picture, instead of one painted over... was nice to see once in a while a block does go orphan which explains where it mysteriously disappeared to, instead of scratching my head and trying to examine things and find out what happened to that unconfirmed block... I think it would also help explain things to people who wonder why they didn't paid for something, can point out quick it was an orphan.
P.S. I think this is a great way to review whats going on with the pool... being able to see the pools shares linked with the payout, along with your own shares to see if something changed dramatic or you're still going steady.
-
anyone else notice the nice jump in PTS value... 1 PTS to BTC to USD $15.46 using cryptsy to coinbase to cash out (at the time of this message, could change 5 seconds after I click post)... I wonder if people are gobbling up PTS waiting for the rumored DAC to hit at the end of the month... might explain why we saw a jump in mining on beeeeer...
-
Stats update:
-replace block shares with pool shares/min (anyone noticed today's +20% increase? certainly explaining the reduced payout but more blocks found)
-added total pending PTS
-orphan blocks are now removed asap
-added last 100 confirmed blocks
I like the way your page is going, its very helpful. I'll send something your way once I get a chance.
-
Thx for your great work! Maybe with some lines (spaces) in between would look just more readable? :) Just a suggestion ;)
you're absolutely right. just adjusted a few things to make stuff more readable indeed :)
-
is it possible to actually leave orphan blocks in and flag them as such... I always liked having the whole picture, instead of one painted over... was nice to see once in a while a block does go orphan which explains where it mysteriously disappeared to, instead of scratching my head and trying to examine things and find out what happened to that unconfirmed block... I think it would also help explain things to people who wonder why they didn't paid for something, can point out quick it was an orphan.
P.S. I think this is a great way to review whats going on with the pool... being able to see the pools shares linked with the payout, along with your own shares to see if something changed dramatic or you're still going steady.
Will do. Requires some work though ;)
-
pool down?
-
i'm working on it, something's broken on the network node (thx to anon for notification @ irc)
one moment please
- xolokram
ps. wallet/coins are safe
pps. i reset the network node, it might take a few minutes to re-download the blockchain, stay tuned
-
Just came here to report that the pool was down, but it looks like you are on it already! :)
-
I did have another question actually - the pool payout is at 0.2 PTS - is there any chance of also running a manual payout of smaller amounts on 02.18.2014? This is the date at which all PTS should be in someone's wallet to get equivalent bitshares (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2995.0 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2995.0)).
That would be really helpful for people who don't mine very quickly such as myself.
As Stan says on that thread :
But the only date that is critically important is February 28th.
(long before close of business GMT)
Have every PTS in one of your own wallets by then.
Don't leave anything out on an exchange or they will get your BitShares!
(We can't repeat this enough.)
-
The pool is back up!
Stats update:
-blocks showing 0 = orphans
-added Workers and block height to see pool status (as it just went to 0 and back up.. can be seen from stats now).
-
pool should be up again, yes *pheww*
i could schedule a "big" payout for all addresses that have PTS left for the 27th of February
everybody should check they addresses for typos before that
i don't want to have dozens of messages of because someone used a invalid address on the miner on 27/28th of February :)
- xolokram
-
Stats update:
-last 30 days per day summary
PTS is feeling the pressure.. sh/min skyrocketing!
-
@xolokram
After pool rebooting, the rejection is so high. Even I reboot my miner again and again. Anything changed?
-
can you specify some details, like: % of rejects before and now, what miner/os are you using?
is somebody else seeing effects like this?
the (security) changes i've made shouldn't result in more rejects. but if you encounter reconnects, that could be the effect of the changes yesterday.
- xolokram
-
I had some high rejections rate yesterday, but this morning it's ~2%, acceptable I guess.
By the way, can you update WW @ # again? 8)
-
@xolokram,
What I using is ptsminer0.7 linux sse4. The most of miners rejection over 20%, but not all. Before yesterday rebooting, It look not like this.
From payout log, also can see this. Before yesterday, I can get 0.2+pts per block, but yesterday, I only get 0.1 per block.
Could you have a look what happened?
-
Besides, there is one machine which is running opencl ptsminer of girino. Before yesterday, it only get 1 or 2 rejetion per day. But from yesterday, it's rejection rate is 30% so far.
-
I don't know if I am mining anything. I dont know how close or far I am from 0.2 PTS. I don't know if beeeeer is a scam or not as other coins have problems too. In other words I'm completely in the dark. I'm expecting all my mined coins to be eaten.
I just hope that this next month really is the end of PTS.
Never again!
-
I also had pretty high rejection rate yesterday evening but can't tell exact numbers.
But I got disconnect some times because of 14(?) rejects in a row...
-
@deadgoat
beeeeer is not a scam
-
hi,
sorry for the late and *spoiler* unstatisfying reply:
i'm currently busy fixing the primecoin pool backend
i'll come back here later and answer the questions once i'm done there. sorry.
- xolokram
ps. i'm available on the irc channel for easy questions, but i'm busy, so don't expect quick answers :)
-
I don't know if I am mining anything. I dont know how close or far I am from 0.2 PTS. I don't know if beeeeer is a scam or not as other coins have problems too. In other words I'm completely in the dark. I'm expecting all my mined coins to be eaten.
I just hope that this next month really is the end of PTS.
Never again!
Visit...
http://mypts.eu.org/
you can enter your PTS address, and it will give you an overwhelming amount of information about the beeeer pool and your personal stats... you will see that in the past 24 hours the amount of miners on this pool has TRIPLED, so I can only imagine the stress it is putting on the current system...
this page will show you blocks found, the block reward, your pay for that block, how many shares you made for that block, and then it will show how many shares the ENTIRE pool made for the block... which shows there is a HUGE spike in people coming over to the pool... if you look at the block history the past couple days...
-
can you specify some details, like: % of rejects before and now, what miner/os are you using?
is somebody else seeing effects like this?
the (security) changes i've made shouldn't result in more rejects. but if you encounter reconnects, that could be the effect of the changes yesterday.
- xolokram
As of the time stamp on this message, I restarted my clpts miner and after 30min rejection rates appear to be my normal 1.5% rate... however they were higher when I checked the miner earlier... I almost want to say the spike in rejects seems to chime in with the spike in users added to the pool...
After letting the miner run for a while, I am now noticing the rejects are starting to climb again... already up to 4% and rising... (10min later its down to 2% again, it seems to be all over the board today)
clpts 0.1.4
windows 8.1 64bit
seems ypool is having issues the last 24 hours with downtime and people are jumping all over with their miners... someone there mentioned another DDOS attack on things causing issues...
-
can you specify some details, like: % of rejects before and now, what miner/os are you using?
is somebody else seeing effects like this?
the (security) changes i've made shouldn't result in more rejects. but if you encounter reconnects, that could be the effect of the changes yesterday.
- xolokram
As of the time stamp on this message, I restarted my clpts miner and after 30min rejection rates appear to be my normal 1.5% rate... however they were higher when I checked the miner... I almost want to say the spike in rejects seems to chime in with the spike in users added to the pool...
checking the website below with my PTS address...
http://mypts.eu.org/
I notice two time periods where my shares per minute dropped about 10% and the pool shares greatly increased... so I'm assuming the large spikes in users pointing over possibly created the higher rejection rate... just a theory... however shortly after those time periods my shares go back to normal which is my whole basis for this thought... those numbers seem to match up with my increased rejection rate.
could some of the high rejection rates be caused by slow internet access to the pool? meaning people far away from its location respond slowly with shares found and they get rejected?
I'm also having an increased amount of rejections. The pool has seen over 2x sh/m increase over the last 24h.
-
I'm also seeing an increased amount of rejects.
[STATS] 2014-Feb-21 15:56:46 | 13563.45 c/m | 53.20 sh/m | VL: 19899 (97.08%), RJ: 593 (2.89%), ST: 6 (0.03%)
[STATS] 2014-Feb-21 16:02:17 | 4235.97 c/m | 16.30 sh/m | VL: 5957 (94.78%), RJ: 327 (5.20%), ST: 1 (0.02%)
-
The monster below recently started mining on the pool, this guy has to have over 1mill c/m.
"Pra7CmiuQKR1wnTS4Ps8KfG4bpA1kzse4B": 3.6886357952192643
-
Someone kick him off! :-\
-
Stats update:
get notified by email when a new block is found! You can enter your email on the web page, validate it and there you go ;D
-
I am seeing a 7.55% reject rate. I don't have a record from before, but don't think it was that high. Running a 270x/clpts.
-
at what point does Beeeeerr transfer PTS to my wallet? For example. Ypool transfers it at 1 PTS.
Also how can I see confirmed PTS using http://mypts.eu.org/ ???
-
The monster below recently started mining on the pool, this guy has to have over 1mill c/m.
"Pra7CmiuQKR1wnTS4Ps8KfG4bpA1kzse4B": 3.6886357952192643
http://mypts.eu.org/?a=Pra7CmiuQKR1wnTS4Ps8KfG4bpA1kzse4B
yes this is clearly not an individual person who has been doing this for long... looking at the track record from the website they clearly have an explosion in computing power they did not have before... I'm wondering if this is one of those botnets that people talk about hijacking pools with their stolen computing power...
assuming it was GPU power, it does come out to over 1 million cpm, and the dollar in hardware required would be close to a quarter million dollars... now if its using CPU power that number well more than doubles in cost... something about it just absolutely stinks...
in a one hour period on the 21st the computing power jumps almost 15x what it was using before... in just an 8 hour period they made almost $1000 in coins... something is fishy...
-
at what point does Beeeeerr transfer PTS to my wallet? For example. Ypool transfers it at 1 PTS.
Also how can I see confirmed PTS using http://mypts.eu.org/ ???
it pays out after .2 coins and you can see confirmed blocks on that website below where it says...
"Last 100 confirmed blocks:"
it has the unconfirmed blocks just above it... usually a few... did you enter your PTS address where it says, PTS address to see your payout? and click submit?
-
Has anyone tested their daily PTS against Ypool and found it to be the same or more? It seems like what I'm gaining from less fees is being negated by the 7-8% total rejection rate I have at the moment. (3% on one worker, 5.5% on another.)
-
rejection rate is over 50% in the last 2 hours - moving 600 cores back to ypool!
-
The monster below recently started mining on the pool, this guy has to have over 1mill c/m.
"Pra7CmiuQKR1wnTS4Ps8KfG4bpA1kzse4B": 3.6886357952192643
http://mypts.eu.org/?a=Pra7CmiuQKR1wnTS4Ps8KfG4bpA1kzse4B
yes this is clearly not an individual person who has been doing this for long... looking at the track record from the website they clearly have an explosion in computing power they did not have before... I'm wondering if this is one of those botnets that people talk about hijacking pools with their stolen computing power...
assuming it was GPU power, it does come out to over 1 million cpm, and the dollar in hardware required would be close to a quarter million dollars... now if its using CPU power that number well more than doubles in cost... something about it just absolutely stinks...
in a one hour period on the 21st the computing power jumps almost 15x what it was using before... in just an 8 hour period they made almost $1000 in coins... something is fishy...
It wouldn't take $250k to reach 1mill cpm. I estimated it at ~$150k. But his activity is very suspicious, its like it took him a day or so to set up his rigs with the correct configs and then boom just throw them all at the pool at once.
-
It wouldn't take $250k to reach 1mill cpm. I estimated it at ~$150k. But his activity is very suspicious, its like it took him a day or so to set up his rigs with the correct configs and then boom just throw them all at the pool at once.
Well I'm estimating total costs... video cards alone assuming a 280X $400 for 3500cpm would take 300+ cards... thats 120k there plus tax and delivery... start throwing in all the additional support hardware, the facilities to cram all that into, the upgraded power requirements and electrical facilities alone would cost a lot of money... you can't do that in a home without massive upgrades to industrial power... so it makes more sense they are using an industrial facility wired for that much power... massive industrial cooling for 100,000 watts... knowing what its taken for datacenters I have helped with, its well into a quarter million...
thats why I think its just suspicious activity that is most likely some funny business going on with cpu stealing from thousands of computers... maybe I'm wrong, but you just don't see many people with over 300 video cards, most likely well beyond that using earlier models if it was someone who was building up... but hey maybe I am wrong and someone really has spent money on all that... but its illogical they would suddenly appear here in such small fragments earlier, and then explode recently.
-
Hi,
first, i hope i won't miss a statement/message/question: i'm sorry if i'll do, post again pls :)
@rejection rate:
i've activated a few security measurements on the pool, this includes disconnecting spamming miners (very rare!) and rejecting shares that are identical clones of already submitted shares. i know that the original miner is having an issue with this on machines with a lot of computing power due to the blocktemplate-creating method. i don't know if this has been changed/updated/fixed/checked on the third-party miners?!?!
i hope (at least) one of the developer is reading this.
@Darkbane+wsnnwa&Co.:
I just checked "...kzse4B", from what i'm able to tell it doesn't look like a botnet. But you could never know, as there are enough ways to obfuscate the connections. Anyway, thanks for finding, i'll keep an eye on that.
it also could be already existing server farm that is currently (temporary?) switching to PTS due to the 28th February event.
@justmwa:
sorry :) but i think you're faster than me with this
feature request --> a general pool stats page with daily stats like: #shares / block
- xolokram
-
@rejection rate:
i've activated a few security measurements on the pool, this includes disconnecting spamming miners (very rare!) and rejecting shares that are identical clones of already submitted shares. i know that the original miner is having an issue with this on machines with a lot of computing power due to the blocktemplate-creating method. i don't know if this has been changed/updated/fixed/checked on the third-party miners?!?!
@xolokram,
I am using ptsminer v0.7. Is it have the issue you mentioned above? If yes, how to fix it
-
Or could you just revert your fix? so far, my old machines only can use ptsminer or jh's miner. Yam doesn't work because my linux kenerl is old and I cannot do upgrading for them.
-
Or could you just revert your fix?
you're aware of the fact, that this would mean it'll be exploitable?!
btw. that's why i want to see the #share/block needed, it should decrease with the new (actually old, but now re-activated) security-fix, although i admit that the higher rejection rate looks crappy on the miner's side.
I am using ptsminer v0.7. Is it have the issue you mentioned above? If yes, how to fix it
by fixing the code or thinking of a better solution for blocktemplate-creation.
and not all rejections are caused by the security-fix, some might by caused by the increased workload of the server & decreased block time that's currently happening due to the rising popularity of protoshares.
-
@xolokram,
So far, I am not very sure what the issue is. Could you tell me how server judge a share is a identical clone? Or could you provide a fix on ptsminer v0.7? I can test it.
-
Left the miners running on 600 cores overnight - average reject rate 14%!! Please make this fix a priority
-
Although reject rate is very high, you wouldn't obtain better results on ypool. Everybody gets the same share of a block so you are not loosing 10% as in effect everybody is affected so everyone's share size remains the same with or without loss. Maybe the pool finds 10% less blocks, but it is not even that clear.
-
Stats update:
added pending balance (what's validated, <0.2PTS before payout).
-
Is just me or is there something weird going on with the server? I keep getting disconnects on all my miners with 6 different rigs....Or it might be my internet taking a crap.
It seems like the pool is having issues...
Edit1:
block reward pays sh/min pool sh/m
55445 12.517 0.144 25.5 2207.3
Edit2:
Now its down...
Edit3:
It came back!! LOL
-
I've just read 4 pages of this thread back and didn't see an answer, sorry if already posted.
Would it be possible to have a massive payout the morning of Feb 28? This way everyone, even those with < 0.2 PTS, can have it added to their wallet for the bitshares-x snapshot?
-
It's up with 48% rejects- it's down - it's up but not finding any shares! What a waste of time!
I agree, we need that payout on Feb 28 because the way it's going, we aren't going to mine any more!
-
Dead!
Ypool is working nicely.
-
it also could be already existing server farm that is currently (temporary?) switching to PTS due to the 28th February event.
It seems like the february 28th event is now march 15th about... they've hinted at this in other threads on this forum... so who knows when it'll really hit, they just said the ides of march has significance to them...
looks like they are saying the snapshot will be taken february 28th for march 15th... I wish they would start posting clear information as they are just releasing so much information without clarity... AGS is already making me fume after they said PTS was the way in... so many changes how do you follow them.
-
with difficulty increasing x2 tomorrow it won't matter how long pts survives... only big farms will make money out of it.
-
with difficulty increasing x2 tomorrow it won't matter how long pts survives... only big farms will make money out of it.
The mass exodus is about to take place.
-
So the calculator here stats I should be getting Daily earning @ 17000 cpm: 4.1366 PTS - http://mrx.im/pts.php?cpm=17000
I've been running for 24 hours and this is what I have
Last 30 days (including unpaid):
date pays USD EUR blocks
2014-02-23 0.4PTS $ 6.4 4.0EUR 8
2014-02-22 2.6PTS $44.4 27.6EUR 44
2014-02-21 0.4PTS $ 7.3 4.5EUR 7
block date reward pays sh/min pool sh/m confirm
56085 2014-02-23 07:38:39 12.581 0.073 62.9 10910.3 000/120
56014 2014-02-23 05:48:33 12.528 0.074 64.3 10901.2 035/120
Unconfirmed: 0.1465116PTS ($2.52, 1.57EUR)
Pending balance: 0.00PTS (min. payout 0.2)
Doesn't add up, or am I missing something?
-
st:8452
please tell me what does the `st` mean...
-
Indeed, PTS/day dropped 50% in the last 48h :( the pool isn't geared towards such high sh/min and is certainly missing blocks.
-
Just reporting:
Reject rate is still big (~10%).
Payouts are half or less than those of two days ago.
Do we have regional EU server?
Region shards could help.
-
hi,
the pool had to struggle with some higher workload during the last days. i'll change the share difficulty to reduce the workload, thus the overall shares/minute will decrease (in total for everyone). payouts & blocks are not affected by this.
i hope this will also reduce the rejection problem.
i'll report back once the difficulty is changed. and once it has been changed: feel free to report your observation.
Although reject rate is very high, you wouldn't obtain better results on ypool. Everybody gets the same share of a block so you are not loosing 10% as in effect everybody is affected so everyone's share size remains the same with or without loss.
this ^
@wsnnwa:
regarding your disconnect problem: what hardware are you using?
- xolokram
-
hi,
the pool had to struggle with some higher workload during the last days. i'll change the share difficulty to reduce the workload, thus the overall shares/minute will decrease (in total for everyone). payouts & blocks are not affected by this.
i hope this will also reduce the rejection problem.
i'll report back once the difficulty is changed. and once it has been changed: feel free to report your observation.
Although reject rate is very high, you wouldn't obtain better results on ypool. Everybody gets the same share of a block so you are not loosing 10% as in effect everybody is affected so everyone's share size remains the same with or without loss.
this ^
@wsnnwa:
regarding your disconnect problem: what hardware are you using?
- xolokram
Everything is good now.
-
ok, share target updated.
also: if you see more stales instead of rejects than before (stales should be actually pretty rare) -> they are basically just rejects, i currently use the stale-value for statistical purpose to get a better understanding of the problem to finally fix it hopefully soon
-
ok, share target updated.
also: if you see more stales instead of rejects than before (stales should be actually pretty rare) -> they are basically just rejects, i currently use the stale-value for statistical purpose to get a better understanding of the problem to finally fix it hopefully soon
what a difference the doubling of the difficulty makes... back down to 1.50% rejections or less...
-
I've noticed the beeeeer hasn't been finding many blocks for the last couple of days - what is the cause of this? Is it bad luck that will even out over time, or something else?
-
I've noticed the beeeeer hasn't been finding many blocks for the last couple of days - what is the cause of this? Is it bad luck that will even out over time, or something else?
And I just read above that the network difficulty has just increased! :D I guess that's the cause. Is the payout limit going to be reduced to reflect this?
-
Im newbie for ptsweb.beeeeer.org
its a automatic payout? I mined 2 hours in my wallet still its zero ?
Please help me
-
it's at a .2 balance they payout. You can put your addy in here to check.
http://mypts.eu.org/
I'm wondering if the pool is okay? I know difficulty has gone up but I don't think they've mined a block for awhile? Any ideas?
57157
Is this the last block found on Beeeeeeer?
Thanks
-
its a automatic payout? I mined 2 hours in my wallet still its zero ?
payout is exectued when your reach 0.2 pts
I'm wondering if the pool is okay? I know difficulty has gone up but I don't think they've mined a block for awhile? Any ideas?
57157
Is this the last block found on Beeeeeeer?
Thanks
yep, pool is alright as far as i can tell
we're just 3-4% of the network (that's about 10 blocks per day on average, luck is a bitch)
and the difficult hit us hard (as everyone else)
- xolokram
ps. i plan to execute a dry-run for this evening/tonight to see if everything will work fine for tomorrow's big payout, just fyi
pps. how are the rejection rates atm?
-
Are you sure the pool is ok? If so, it's being very unlucky.
For example, on 22-02 it found ~45 blocks, so with the difficultly doubling, it should be be finding roughly half that amount (if I understand correctly), but so far today none have been found.
EDIT - and we just found one :D http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=raw&s=pts&m=blk&id=57302 (http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=raw&s=pts&m=blk&id=57302)
Looks like the number of miners is down today, so that might be accounting for the discrepancy (http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=stats&s=pts (http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=stats&s=pts))
-
yep, we were a little bit unlucky today
but choosing the 22th for comparison is a kind of cherry-picking here
i would say the average is still something around ~10 blocks per day with the current difficulty and the # of miners
-
Yeah, the 22nd did kind of leap out - it just happens to be a very good day that is still on page 1 of the stats. :)
-
I get co stant disco nects after about a few hours to a day using the digital ocean setup exactly as you specitied.
I constantly find it has disconnected after time.
I check the terminal window and find it stopped and i have to manually restart it.
After having this problem for quite some time I added a auto restart which lessens the frequency of having to manually restart it but even then it still needs it after about a day.
Any thoughts?
Its setup exactly as you specified in digital ocean. Thanks.
-
#blockid #time
57551 14-02-27 11:50:37
57384 14-02-26 18:05:04
57356 14-02-26 15:29:46
57320 14-02-26 12:35:44
57302 14-02-26 11:20:27
57157 14-02-25 22:43:35
57132 14-02-25 20:38:19
57112 14-02-25 18:11:24
57096 14-02-25 16:30:31
57090 14-02-25 16:08:04
57081 14-02-25 15:09:18
56990 14-02-25 07:15:42
56971 14-02-25 05:28:27
56928 14-02-25 02:03:57
Number of blocks per day decreasing dramatically!
Yesterday four blocks, today only one block.
Is everything fine out there?
-
not only the pool is doing pretty poorly
the whole network is kinda slow atm -> https://coinplorer.com/PTS
transactions / payouts for everybody with more than 0.001 PTS and a valid PTS addres are out (for about an hour now!) and are currently in network limbo, we'll have to wait until a block is found and the transactions get their confirmations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:
beeeeer's pool just found block #57614, hopefully including some transactions
/edit2:
thank you, xolokram
you're welcome :P
-
Thanks for the unscheduled payout - looks like mine did arrive last night. :D
-
transactions / payouts for everybody with more than 0.001 PTS and a valid PTS addres are out (for about an hour now!) and are currently in network limbo, we'll have to wait until a block is found and the transactions get their confirmations
Thanks a lot xolokram. You've been a great help to the community and have been really honourable in sending over everyone's remaining PTS before the snapshot.
-
Just switched to ypool again and found more shares in 90 minutes than beeeeer found in a whole day! Yes, there definitely was problems with this pool. So now I guess I'm gone forever!
Bye folks!
-
Just switched to ypool again and found more shares in 90 minutes than beeeeer found in a whole day! Yes, there definitely was problems with this pool. So now I guess I'm gone forever!
Bye folks!
YPool has a lot more miners though, IIRC, so any blocks they found will be split between many more people. I'm not an expert, but I guess over time you end up with the same rate of PTS, regardless of the pool.
-
Overall, I would say that I have earned much more from ypool in the past few months. Both pools suffer from rejects and disconnects from time to time, so that was generally my reason for switching. You earn from the shares that you find - it really doesn't matter who else is finding them too. There will always be someone with 600 cores or more to make you jealous! You have to play with what you've got.
-
Overall, I would say that I have earned much more from ypool in the past few months. Both pools suffer from rejects and disconnects from time to time, so that was generally my reason for switching. You earn from the shares that you find - it really doesn't matter who else is finding them too. There will always be someone with 600 cores or more to make you jealous! You have to play with what you've got.
Not all shares are created equal. This is an obvious question, but do ypool and beeeeer use the same share difficulty? example: If you find 20% more shares with ypool, but beeeer has 2x higher share difficulty, you make a lot more pts in beeeer than ypool even though you find more shares in ypool.
-
Don't know about you guys butIi am doing pretty good again.
The pay per share has dropped a few days but has gone up now.
Just like it was before the funny drop
-
Hi. i'm new to PTS mining and im wondering why nothing is showing in the stats section, thus i#m mining at 8 cores for 3 days@24h.
Is the pool up and all ok? Accepted shares are ~600.. so it should display something?
-
user stats are based on blocks & payouts
thus you'll have to wait until the first block you've been participated in will be found
(beeeeeer's pts pool is quite small (% of the network), thus this can take a few hours :-X)
-
#blockid #time
57551 14-02-27 11:50:37
57384 14-02-26 18:05:04
57356 14-02-26 15:29:46
57320 14-02-26 12:35:44
57302 14-02-26 11:20:27
57157 14-02-25 22:43:35
57132 14-02-25 20:38:19
57112 14-02-25 18:11:24
57096 14-02-25 16:30:31
57090 14-02-25 16:08:04
57081 14-02-25 15:09:18
56990 14-02-25 07:15:42
56971 14-02-25 05:28:27
56928 14-02-25 02:03:57
Number of blocks per day decreasing dramatically!
Yesterday four blocks, today only one block.
Is everything fine out there?
58079 14-03-04 14:32:41
58037 14-03-04 01:20:28
57922 14-03-02 07:38:48
57910 14-03-02 04:47:52
57888 14-03-02 00:29:22
less and less blocks, less and less miners...
would it be possible to lower the payout threshold to 0.01 ?
thanks
-
Hi all,
please find here a beeeeer.org companion app for pts : http://smab.ath.cx/pts_beeeeer/
Designed for slow miners, you can :
- see mining progress and estimated payout date (at current 0.2pts threshold)
- if you register, you can be emailed whenever a block is found
- if you link your pts address and your email in your profile, receive a direct link to your stats
More stats will be added from time to time, stay tuned!
And if of course you find it useful, see signature below ;)
Thanks!
-
Nice! 8)
PS: tu vas pas envoyer trop de mails au nb de blocks découverts ces temps-ci...
-
transactions / payouts for everybody with more than 0.001 PTS and a valid PTS addres are out (for about an hour now!) and are currently in network limbo, we'll have to wait until a block is found and the transactions get their confirmations
Thanks a lot xolokram. You've been a great help to the community and have been really honourable in sending over everyone's remaining PTS before the snapshot.
Thumbs up! 8)
-
Nice! 8)
PS: tu vas pas envoyer trop de mails au nb de blocks découverts ces temps-ci...
Thanks!
PS: malheureusement.... :'(
-
Nice! 8)
PS: tu vas pas envoyer trop de mails au nb de blocks découverts ces temps-ci...
got one ! :P
-
meanwhile, a big pool is finding one per hour and rewards are 10x higher.. something's wrong with beeeeer :/
-
i just wanted to let you all know, that beeeeer has now its own *work-in-progress* board to gather all the good links/projects/faq/tutorials ets.pp.
it can be found here: board.beeeeer.org (http://board.beeeeer.org)
although i dont expect everyone to switch to that board (i won't beg or force you), i hope i'll see some of the community members from here on beeeeer's board too.
no panic, i will be still here and answer your questions/PMs :)
@justmwa:
could you give us at least some more details about your arguments, probably the pool name & mining software you're comparing with?
beeeeer's pts pool is quite small (compared to the overall network power), thus we're more depending on luck, than other (=bigger) pools.
@totoleheros:
thank you for your miner stats page :thumbs-up:
regarding the payout barrier: yeah, sure, i can do that, but i don't think that 0.01 PTS is a good idea (atm), i think 0.1 would be a better next step.
@sharetarget&ypool:
i don't think that ypool & beeeer use the same share target, thus it's not useful to compare them directly
and secondly this is always a question of the used mining software and its efficiency
- xolokram
-
Hi all,
please find here a changelog for beeeeer.org companion app 4 pts : http://smab.ath.cx/pts_beeeeer/
- added latest block found shares percentage
- added latest block found payout ranking
PM me in case of bugs.
Have a nice sunny day, 8)
-
...
i've added a link to your page on ptsweb info page
-
Hello !
Can someone tell me why my windows 7 64bit does not recognize any gpu miner as a 64bit application ? ( wich it is ). It says it is not 64 bit compatible.
I can run a 64bit CPU miner no problem.
Thank you !
-
Are you sure you're running a 64bit OS? (check the system status information)
Otherwise you should ask the author of the mining software.
- xolokram
-
Hello xolokram,
Yes I'm running a 64bit OS. I can run any 64 bit cpu miner. But gpu miner doesn't work. I thought this was a common issue and that there was an easy solution.
Thanks for your help !
-
did you install the appropiate OpenCL/Cuda drivers/libaries for your OS and used hardware? :)
*playing tech support*
-
Hello xolokram,
Yes I'm running a 64bit OS. I can run any 64 bit cpu miner. But gpu miner doesn't work. I thought this was a common issue and that there was an easy solution.
Thanks for your help !
I had proble too, but then I realised that I need the right compute capability version based on link bellow. eg. for my GTX570 I dwnloaded files for
compute capability 2.0 (the others doesnot work)
Hope this helps.
- cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-2.0-crz.zip - compute capability 2.0
- cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-2.1-crz.zip - compute capability 2.1
- cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-3.0-crz.zip - compute capability 3.0
- cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-3.5-crz.zip - compute capability 3.5
- cudaPTSwin-0.4-experimental-cuda-3.0-3.5-crz.zip - compute capability 3.0/3.5 (fastest - will need 1.2/2+ gig of GPU memory)
Check your version here -> https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus
-
Hi
i just wanted to let you all know, that I've recently decreased the payout threshold to 0.1 PTS
- xolokram
-
Hi
i just wanted to let you all know, that I've recently decreased the payout threshold to 0.1 PTS
- xolokram
updated beeeeer.org companion app 4 pts : http://smab.ath.cx/pts_beeeeer/
-
Quick question. I have been mining for a little while, almost a day. But when I go to check my stats, it says that the address doesn't exist. I tried both, the one on beeeeer.org and the one on http://smab.ath.cx/pts_beeeeer/. I have double checked my address just in case I typed it wrong. Do I have to wait longer before the stats show? Or am I missing something? Thank you.
I think I just read that you have to get your first payment. So forget that I wrote this. If I am incorrect let me know.
-
Quick question. I have been mining for a little while, almost a day. But when I go to check my stats, it says that the address doesn't exist. I tried both, the one on beeeeer.org and the one on http://smab.ath.cx/pts_beeeeer/. I have double checked my address just in case I typed it wrong. Do I have to wait longer before the stats show? Or am I missing something? Thank you.
I think I just read that you have to get your first payment. So forget that I wrote this. If I am incorrect let me know.
Don't feel bad I just made the same mistake myself. But if the payment threshold is set for .1pts and you are a new miner using a i7, 93.6 c/m and running 4 threads is there any way to estimate when you might receive your first payout (just simply so I know I have done everything right). I am using ptsminer v.5 and it shows collision's being found and shares being submitted.
-
Pool is down since block #61395.
-
thanks for the information, i'm investigating... brb
(of course while i was sleeping......)
- xolokram
/edit1:
backend (protoshares network) node killed itself destroying its blockchain data
i'll have to rebuild (=receive) the whole blockchain again, this will take a while
payouts/coins are* safe
* = should be :)
/edit2:
ok, everything should be up & fine again
i'm sorry for the inconvenience
-
Hi, I'm having trouble to make clpts-v1.1 to work on Linux. This is what I get:
connected to ptsmine.beeeeer.org:1337
11:27:05 | 0 c/m | 0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.00%) | RJ: 0 (0.00%) | ST: 0 (0.00%)
11:27:15 | 0 c/m | 0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.00%) | RJ: 0 (0.00%) | ST: 0 (0.00%)
11:27:25 | 0 c/m | 0 sh/m | VL: 0 (0.00%) | RJ: 0 (0.00%) | ST: 0 (0.00%)
Is the server down?
Thanks in advance.
-
I believe it is down. The way I confirm is to go here: http://beta.beeeeer.org/index.php?p=stats&s=pts
and look at the bottom graph. Shares/min is at 0.
-
awww
crap, one moment
/edit:
fixed, running again, i'll have to change the node setup
i hope it won't happen again until this has been done (it'll take some time/effort *urghs*)
sorry, guys
-
It's all ok Xolo, thank you for the fix.
-
hi
pool update incoming, expect some downtime
done. thank you for your patience.
- xolokram
-
Hi, I have been mining at your pool for over two hours and gotten over 50 shares yet when I go to check my stats... nothing shows!
Hence - You're not paying me what you owe me! >:( I'd like this rectified at once! thank you very much.
PS: I've attached some screenshots as proof...
(http://imgur.com/4YlnsuV.jpg)
(http://imgur.com/DEWpnsq.jpg)
-
thanks for being patient and friendly :o
shares on beeeeer's pts pool are bound to the current round (the next found block)
beeeeer's pts pool is <1% of the whole network, thus the average block amount per day is: <1
we were pretty unlucky the last 2 days, thus there was no block so far and no new stats for this time interval
i hope this was helpful :)
- xolokram
wow, long time no "where's my moniz plz"-post
-
Thanks for the quick reply! And thanks for clarifying! Guess I'll keep mining then! the sooner "we" find a block the better!
-
I've been mining on 4 CPUs for a month now and not revived a single pay out. Can I check what's up. Here's my payment details:
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PcSAHLT4a9y4hgz7wBsas99cEAScgWN7NM (https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PcSAHLT4a9y4hgz7wBsas99cEAScgWN7NM)
-
hi,
the pool is currently the pure incarnation of "bad luck" :-\
i've checked everything, it's not a bug/problem imho :o
@No_2:
according...
http://www.beeeeer.org/?p=user&s=pts&a=PcSAHLT4a9y4hgz7wBsas99cEAScgWN7NM
http://pts.syware.de/?a=PcSAHLT4a9y4hgz7wBsas99cEAScgWN7NM
& the actual blockchain (your link)
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PcSAHLT4a9y4hgz7wBsas99cEAScgWN7NM
...you've received payouts (don't know about "reviving payouts" :D )
check / rescan your wallet
- xolokram
-
Thanks for the quick reply xolokram.
I should have been more specific: I've been mining intensively on 4 CPUs since just after May 5th; so are you saying that the pools just not been finding any blocks?
-
we've found a few blocks since then: see http://www.beeeeer.org/?p=raw&m=blk&s=pts
but the last days are extremely sad :-\
-
Hi everybody,
I wanted to let you know, that I'm planning to shutdown beeeeer's PTS pool around early August (2014).
Thanks for everyone who has supported the pool & its development.
Of course, there will be a final payout for everyone who has some shares left in the payout system/queue.
The exact date (& further details if necessary) will be added in the upcoming week. I'll also add a note to the official website.
- xolokram
-
Thank you for the pool and PTS support, its been great!
Now what to mine?!
-
shutdown beeeeer's PTS pool around early August
This is scheduled now for the 7th of August 2014
It will be followed (within a few days) by the last payouts for the remaining addresses.
Which is followed (within a few days/weeks) by the deletion of all Block and Payout information.
Which is then followed (within a few days) by closing/locking this thread.
At least that's the plan :o
Thank you for the pool and PTS support, its been great!
You're welcome. It was fun (although sometimes very stressful), I learned a lot and I found some very good new friends.
- xolokram
ps. board/raw servers are shut down already and nobody noticed... good :)
-
Excellent work on the pool. That interface will live on fondly in my memory :). Perhaps one of the last of its kind...
-
well, thank you, Riverhead :)
reminder:
server will be shut down in ~11 hours DONE
after that i'll work on the final payout for all remaining addresses
although i don't like ETAs: i will execute those payouts (several 100) by the end of this week*
please, be sure that there are no typos in your payout addresses
- xolokram
ps. * = depending on how fast i am & when all remaining blocks (currently: 2) are confirmed
-
beeeeer's last PTS block has been confirmed yesterday
i'm currently gathering the information & writing the script
i'll execute the final payout in chunks within the next days*
addresses containing less than the network transaction fee (0.0001 PTS) & broken/invalid/banned addresses will be discarded!
this means there will be still around ~2700 addresses to be paid
- xolokram
* = started on 13th of August (unfortunately no friday :D )
-
all final payouts are executed:
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/cf6766fc0b524be1b67123b0d55dcb070aa3dc52730f6694cc854a38124674ae
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/8a0a80214f9fc98698a25c627d314efc6e7971bf437c12d1fd73844f51590a90
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/e80f7fd2de6c511cf1b2bfcaac0c8d24cfb8eb149566ca30253538d6fa552245
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/bd130d45e450ae41ab840fae6fb2e6cb71b63752da02489bb450568787101e27
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/abd0ac063b7ffff54816f44cbfc3c50478ce668d2155d4d75a7ba00e68420ae4
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/26bc8adbed92f300698a12abfee40241d9b7d67fb78d91638e235c33cc844696
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/5a36a226458d2ba6776923bd8c38b1d349f1c9b088b3149e2dc37e92d93b066f
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/15ba63ac753cca8fd8b0ab33bbe47bfa4a170503e6da58b1fa13b4525b8cb0b0
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/7192936cd906a00bca1fc2b535e6e5092c72466e8f8ff5214caff2d663baaa22
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/0a39d5b2a232689c8e0cf2ad22c6c9a8935fa87e541708a52ccf42c2451293df
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/5ece0cac7c9c1069bb7600ac580ed2a90adf6b395a0f1f47088830b38bfecfde
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/bb107fbb254490a2df521ae8093f2572e260ddb1e47833a26b9501bb04f60c0a
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/31a873db0b2800bc09537acd72e71657d35963845109c6b0fff0a9d2e98806fe
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/fa7c89c15ccc98d62e4a0549c301801ce1ceee4fd5a20ee33d8edd1fb1c3a150
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b169f85e4bedc69073f3eecdf82784247cbd8b18486e32acce945d5ce2752c5d
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/0e196743e8709aedcbc07e17565d885719f44b52e7b176543d7fa3c0a0bd45be
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/3810c721264348377d70b7f062906eebe4ed98e1de7f3ee46ba7f23d2dfed1a6
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/16ec52e3dc0c2b51463dc11516f380479d6c4e601ec07c7c5f3fddbed05f9529
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/1149209c4841853141f278b07406e7c1bd26acc258b3d3923003006e66a28468
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/b50e171b3953dd48fc749e4a65da8cffbc97292f140786aa3ce59b023349e028
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/c59624dbd373db9154e0f2ee8d575ab870e1a9bd6b333fdb168c922663f51b6c
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/8cf94250b016768636fd48a1b8c1fe569ecc32e8485f992027c09587727af913
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/1af368e828685698fc1d21fa2ff8c5192985091fa58259a06e5fb70713e88851
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/532e2d95f3a5ded2a4caf70175578709965261ac7cc6808d0fcea51ba043c54f
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/519e746b5de4a7f10a0d64a691d67c4012afd519425fd3d39a6c585dc8a3a9d3
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/6ec35e7b72ccf11d002153d3ea89521e579661a8ba71577f53ec1b8d06ae3e27
https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Transactions/1d8bf2b7b2e144c0905ac61f72bf0bb1df8b6ff944935a994936313c99c9b35c
i will lock this topic in one month (i hope i have the rights to do this here :) ) on 2014-09-18 2014-09-15 and remove the pts part from the website!
you'll still be able to contact me here, on IRC (#beeeeer.org @ FreeNode) or at peercointalk
- xolokram, good bye & thank you all :)