Author Topic: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool  (Read 419736 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gsrcrxsi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #633 on: November 25, 2013, 08:26:54 pm »
thanks, it does appear the the 3-4hr gap was a large-ish block.

since you removed the payout barrier, how does that work exactly. im still showing .327xx PTS on my user page.

Offline afr33sl4ve

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #632 on: November 25, 2013, 08:21:05 pm »
I just want to use this post to say thank you for all your hard work!

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #631 on: November 25, 2013, 08:07:25 pm »
@jedixjarf:
it's working here (and for 3000+ other miners), check your connection

@gsrcrxsi:
Quote
the payouts depend on the (120) confirmations of the found blocks. thus if there's a gap between to found block because of the randomness (bad luck) then there will be a gap for the payouts too.

@Silver_Pharaoh:
the latency shouldn't affect the communication too much (except causing some rejects)
but not sending / receiving data properly at all is really strange

@all:
i removed the payout barrier (still some people have to reach the minimum value for a valid transaction (0.0001 PTS))
(it will probably be re-activated once all abandoned addresses are gone)


too many PMs about abandoned addresses & complains about "stuck" payouts

- xolokram

ps. this will be next
pps. payout barrier changed to 0.2
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 09:41:07 pm by xolokram »
stats for pts@beeeeer.org
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline jedixjarf

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #630 on: November 25, 2013, 07:40:09 pm »
Delete
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 08:01:30 pm by jedixjarf »
If I helped in anyway please say thanks with some PTS :P

PTS:PZmevKSeb6g12hPDs8MkaFrMgw7cjNJZDa

Offline gsrcrxsi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #629 on: November 25, 2013, 07:14:45 pm »
 is this thing crunching another very large block?

im also at .32xxx PTS with no payout and no updates on new blocks. 

Offline Silver_Pharaoh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #628 on: November 25, 2013, 03:15:44 pm »

@Silver_Pharaoh:
v0.5 & v0.4 work too, i'm kinda riddled by your issue...


- xolokram

ps. i'll implement the 'pay abandoned addresses' script now

@xolokram

Don't feel bad bro, I'm stumped too. I used the 0.5 miner (not the 0.5a version) and it too failed to submit shares.

Since this has never happened before on the 0.5a and 0.5 miner, did you update your servers? Maybe something broke it. Or is it because I have a 800 ms ping time?


This won't be an issue if I can get some help to make a batch file to restart the miner every hour... Does anyone know how to do this using .bat files?

Offline HaunterV

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #627 on: November 25, 2013, 02:53:20 pm »
@HaunterV:
windows? you have to edit the .bat file and run it



Yes Windows.

I'll try, again.

Offline Gekko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Lunch is for wimps........ Greed is good.
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #626 on: November 25, 2013, 02:51:07 pm »
@Gekko:
which OS?
let me re-check the no-chrono makefile
Ubuntu 13.10 64bit

Edit: btw: same error (Segmentation fault) when compiling with makefile.unix !

Edit 2: SOLVED! The machine has only 512MB RAM. Starting ptsminer with option "26" (256MB) works!
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 04:13:35 pm by Gekko »

Offline xolokram

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 239
  • beeeeer.org
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #625 on: November 25, 2013, 02:43:32 pm »
@HaunterV:
windows? you have to edit the .bat file and run it

@goldtiger:
nope, i've not seen the post. i guess they just linked to my github and the current version is using a hardcoded pool address, i should re-add a convenient method for parameters :)
but i've seen this
"YPool is officially boycotted until they fix the 'bug' preventing them from processing transactions. Please use other pools."
a little too late imho and i guess they won't give a fu--

@lordfirefox:
can you give us more details on your problem?

@Silver_Pharaoh:
v0.5 & v0.4 work too, i'm kinda riddled by your issue...

@xornof / hayz:
thanks for your help / information

@Gekko:
which OS?
let me re-check the no-chrono makefile

@afr33sl4ve:
it's 'normal', because the payouts depend on confirmations of the found blocks. thus if there's a gap between to found block because of the randomness (bad luck) then there will be a gap for the payouts too.

- xolokram

ps. i'll implement the 'pay abandoned addresses' script now
stats for pts@beeeeer.org
BTC: 1S4kxaF4ro17qThUz4hQwAoiXzCWdzwdb | LTC: LMgYASNbAgGUG6fhw1xdMAWSbMiWjNNGgo
XPM: AJhA1PGbNM94ZmsJvVVM5FfbE9SdxiMzgd | PTS: PbfspbvSWxYqrp3DpRH7bsrmEqzY3418Ap

Offline HaunterV

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #624 on: November 25, 2013, 02:31:35 pm »
I'm super new and When I dl and run the thing in the OP it just closes instantly. Is there something I'm missing?

Offline Gekko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
  • Lunch is for wimps........ Greed is good.
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #623 on: November 25, 2013, 11:40:59 am »
I'm trying to run ptsminer on a digitalocean.com machine. This is what happens:
Code: [Select]
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using SPHLIB (no avx/sse4)
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Compilation:
Code: [Select]
root@machine:~/ptsminer/src# make -f makefile.unix.no-chrono
g++ -c -O2  -fpermissive -o obj/cpuid.o cpuid.c
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_avx.o intel/sha512_avx.asm
yasm -f elf64 -o obj/sha512_sse4.o intel/sha512_sse4.asm
g++ -c -O2  -fpermissive -o obj/sha512.o sha512.c
g++ -c -O1  -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2.o sph_sha2.c
sph_sha2.c: In function ‘void sph_sha224_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2.c:628:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_sha2.c: In function ‘void sph_sha256_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2.c:643:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha256_context* {aka sph_sha224_context*}’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha224_short(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sph_sha224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from ‘const void*’ to ‘const unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
   RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
                     ^
sph_sha2.c:615:1: warning:   initializing argument 1 of ‘void sha2_round(const unsigned char*, sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
 sha2_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u32 r[8])
 ^
In file included from sph_sha2.c:655:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha224_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)’:
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha224_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
g++ -c -O1  -fpermissive -o obj/sph_sha2big.o sph_sha2big.c
sph_sha2big.c: In function ‘void sph_sha384_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2big.c:191:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_sha2big.c: In function ‘void sph_sha512_init(void*)’:
sph_sha2big.c:202:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha512_context* {aka sph_sha384_context*}’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha384_short(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:136:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sph_sha384(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
sph_md_helper.c:186:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
sph_md_helper.c:208:21: warning: invalid conversion from ‘const void*’ to ‘const unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
   RFUN(data, SPH_VAL);
                     ^
sph_sha2big.c:178:1: warning:   initializing argument 1 of ‘void sha3_round(const unsigned char*, sph_u64*)’ [-fpermissive]
 sha3_round(const unsigned char *data, sph_u64 r[8])
 ^
In file included from sph_sha2big.c:210:0:
sph_md_helper.c: In function ‘void sha384_addbits_and_close(void*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, unsigned int)’:
sph_md_helper.c:250:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_sha384_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
g++ -c -O2  -pthread  -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/root/ptsminer/src -I/root/ptsminer/src/obj -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -o obj/main_poolminer.o main_poolminer.cpp
g++ -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now  -o ptsminer  obj/cpuid.o obj/sha512_avx.o obj/sha512_sse4.o obj/sha512.o obj/sph_sha2.o obj/sph_sha2big.o obj/main_poolminer.o  -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread

CPUInfo:
Code: [Select]
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 2
model name      : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
stepping        : 3
microcode       : 0x1
cpu MHz         : 1999.999
cache size      : 4096 KB
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 4
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips        : 3999.99
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:


 :(
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 11:46:08 am by Gekko »

Offline hayz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #622 on: November 25, 2013, 07:49:39 am »
No problems with the newest build. C/M count is stable, memory options working again, and rejection rates are w/i usual specs. 10-18% gains over v5. Here are some stats on my rigs.

i7 3930K at 4.7 (12Thread) : 300+ C/M
i7 820 (5T): 110  C/M
Largest Azure servers (8C/16GB, Ubuntu 13) with 8Threads: 100 C/M
i5 3337U (3T): ~75 C/M
i5 3470T (3T): ~90 C/M
Sandy/Ivy Bridge Celerons (2T): ~44 C/M





Thanks for sorting it out, Xolo!


Offline afr33sl4ve

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #621 on: November 25, 2013, 05:13:13 am »
@xolokram, do you, or a team of people including yourself, manually update the payout page? I've noticed that during the days hours for me (GMT -7), it updates far more often than during the night hours.

EDIT: Actually, I haven't noticed a single share pop up on mine for over 2 hours now.

EDIT 2: Too 2 hours, but a new one finally showed up. Is this normal behaviour?
« Last Edit: November 25, 2013, 06:14:29 am by afr33sl4ve »

Offline Silver_Pharaoh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #620 on: November 25, 2013, 03:01:41 am »
EDIT: can I use the older version of the pts miner still? Or will the server not count the collisions it finds? (like version 0.5 or 0.4)
I may be speaking out of turn, but AFAIK, there was no problems continuing to use the .5a Hotfix1 version, it just doesnt have the AVX/SSE4 instruction set code. I go back and use it when i am troubleshooting an issue on the .7 miner(to eliminate hardware as a cause).  I generally don't see the need to go back to the .4 or earlier versions.

Hope that helps!
X

Thanks! You mention that the new 0.7 version gives you no issues in Windows... Is anyone else having this issue where the miner fails to send the collisions to the server?

Offline xornof

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool (up to 501% faster)
« Reply #619 on: November 25, 2013, 02:14:09 am »
Thank you so much xornof! Waiting for your feedback!
Just got home,  I'll start looking at it in a few minutes... Will let everyone know what i find.


@xolo: FYI - I did get a chance to put the "newer" .7 RC2 windows binaries through the paces on most of my windows servers this afternoon, no issues so far. Thanks!


~Xornof
PTS: PwBqbf2dhSYuwWez1vWbWzNu3gSardcPkz  XPM: AFsmbh5hPPfcs3TTga8J9vZjpEdmyDf47h
FTC: 71SyfSFxFAYQWLHRhHydHPD3q19fGyC4U3  BTC: 1JFp43SHaKRWP32MWG1dNMSGzUNtfnnLcU