Coyote Miner | PPS Mining Pool

[001sonkit]

HELP

I have a mac and window, I happily set up the window with the new coyotte miner. I extrated the targz and put the miner to /opt/coyote_miner. then i try to run it with the ip and the address behind. Also tried the method previously mentioned with "cd ./&&./ coyotte_miner"(not exactly, but sth like that).

While both have failed with this following thing:
dyld Symbol not found: __...............Prime_rehash_policy.......
Referenced from: /opt/coyotte_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib

Trace/BPT trap 5
logout

Might anyone help me with some command or point what I am doing wrong. Thanks

[cass]

my shot

can i ask which system you're using? Cause i have 100hpm but only 1/4 of valid shares...

[RejectKid]

I saw your competition on the faster miner on another thread.  will you be posting the new miner here soon?

[cass]

I updated fee to 10%

woah ... 
------
bytemaster got about 2PTS from yesterday wiped from address Pvk4zKDp2ikXXsWbuhBHWq493iSQ4atFBX!
Can you pls check this when you got time ... i know 2 PTS not much for you but it was still 3 hours of mining for me.

Hope there is any chance of recovering those ...
thx for your effort

I will look into it after I get some sleep.

hehe sure no problem get some sleep and recover yourself ..

[bytemaster]

I updated fee to 10%

woah ... 
------
bytemaster got about 2PTS from yesterday wiped from address Pvk4zKDp2ikXXsWbuhBHWq493iSQ4atFBX!
Can you pls check this when you got time ... i know 2 PTS not much for you but it was still 3 hours of mining for me.

Hope there is any chance of recovering those ...
thx for your effort

I will look into it after I get some sleep. 

[rando]

Is there any problems with having several miners on the same payoutaddress? Just put 9 rigs on the same.....

No. It's fine. He mentioned this a page or two back.

[Nuddi]

Is there any problems with having several miners on the same payoutaddress? Just put 9 rigs on the same.....

[cass]

I updated fee to 10%

woah ... 
------
bytemaster got about 2PTS from yesterday wiped from address Pvk4zKDp2ikXXsWbuhBHWq493iSQ4atFBX!
Can you pls check this when you got time ... i know 2 PTS not much for you but it was still 3 hours of mining for me.

Hope there is any chance of recovering those ...
thx for your effort

[udeluxe]

We currently have 48 second blocks... if your machine is slower than 48 seconds to find the first hash it will always reset the search prior to finding anything.   In effect, until the block rate slows down to 5 minutes your machine is too slow to run this proof of work.

Thanks for answer, do you know what is the bottleneck? running on i5 on linux vm is not returning anything
running on some core2 duo on windows natively is fine

[bytemaster]

By Popular Demand I have decided to publish my updates to the momentum search method: http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/momentum.cpp

Now go and make it better and decentralized! 

[bytemaster]

We currently have 48 second blocks... if your machine is slower than 48 seconds to find the first hash it will always reset the search prior to finding anything.   In effect, until the block rate slows down to 5 minutes your machine is too slow to run this proof of work.

[udeluxe]

now fee 10% ?

Orphans are high again, I don't get to keep that, I am just earning less so I pass it along.

OK, sorry I am a newbie.

I wonder if this seems normal?



should we expect to see something higher than 0 straight away?

strange, running from another pc the windows version reports straight away HPM of 10 or so
linux build running on virtual machine on osx host for 1hr and still hpm 0, same as screenshot above

[bytemaster]

I'm running the miner on a bunch of diff servers using the same PTS address.  Sometimes the status line comes back with:
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  earned: 0  pps: 0.00814957  fee: 10%  address: PTSADDRESS  hpm: XXX

then the next status line shows the correct counts.  Is this an issue or expected?  Should I use a diff PTS address for each miner?

Expected, every time there is a block you get all 0's because I skip a database lookup.  Next version of the client will omit that.

[bsamjolake]

I'm running the miner on a bunch of diff servers using the same PTS address.  Sometimes the status line comes back with:
  valid: 0  invalid: 0  balance: 0  paid: 0  earned: 0  pps: 0.00814957  fee: 10%  address: PTSADDRESS  hpm: XXX

then the next status line shows the correct counts.  Is this an issue or expected?  Should I use a diff PTS address for each miner?

[svd]

Broken pipe
    {"message":"Broken pipe"}
    asio  asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
1680627ms th_a       miner.cpp:117                 main                 ] 162.243.67.4:8485
1680630ms th_a       miner.cpp:123                 main                 ] unspecified
Broken pipe
    {"message":"Broken pipe"}
    asio  asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect

Pool down

I just paid out 25% of every balance over 4 PTS  which amounted to about 200 PTS.   
I backed up balances database
I updated fee to 10%

i got about 7PTS or more wiped
from address PuPhu6mh6WLbi6JQxN5MXYUUjtynvVg9hx

i sent you pm
posted few times there

can you check it ?