New mechanism to prevent bad debt (black swan)

Started by bench, October 19, 2018, 02:21:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

binggo


R

QuoteLet's don't talk about the "scam"

That's what it is though, BSIP76 is a scam. BSIP76 proponents could fairly be categorized as "scammers".

binggo

#15
Quote from: R on March 30, 2020, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: binggo on March 29, 2020, 12:47:03 AM
Quote from: R on March 28, 2020, 11:41:39 PM
The consequence of  global settlement already applies to bitasset holders; their held bitassets have depreciated significantly in value & they cannot be settled for the correct accurate value. Fixed feeds are not normal prices.

You misundertand something or not undertand something.

A bitasset is just like a country, now you shut down it, kill all the debtor(incloud healthy debtor),  people will choose to run away, no liquidity output, just make matters worse.

Global settlement is a very failed mechanism, it has been proved by the reality.

We should or must make a more better mechanism.
People are already running away from bitassets because they're SCAMS in their current state. Global settlement would have retained some resemblance of credibility, now BSIP76 proponents have zero credibility.

Fact is the bitassets are dead scamcoins, move onto new smartcoins which haven't been destroyed by loser gamblers.

Let's don't talk about the "scam" or something, focus on the topic.

Global settlement:

Bitbtc is already in Global settlement, let's check:

Reviving   
Auto Revive Price (without/with bids)   0.00004230 bitBTC/BTS / 0.00003467 bitBTC/BTS


Price Feed:                       0.00000258 bitBTC/BTS
DEX Market price:             0.00000903 bitBTC/BTS
Force Settlement Price:   0.00002417 bitBTC/BTS
CEX price:                        0.00000258 bitBTC/BTS

so...this is the problem, everyone had lost the motivation.
Market liquidity and confidence had lost.
Bitbtc holders and debtors were developing into a lose-lose situation.
Only hope is waiting the price rising.

BSIP76 has the same situation like Global settlement.
Market liquidity and confidence had lost.
lose-lose.
Only hope is waiting the price rising.

--------------------------------

Why can't we isolate the bad debts(which the Collateral Ratio <1), use the bonds and income of bitasset to handle it?

1. feed price still will be normal;
2. still can pledge;
1 and 2 will provide the motivation and liquidity
3. The hope will not only is waiting the price rising.

pstrident

the solution is individual margin calls before global settlement happens.... i sat with bad debt before the first GS and was never called i should have been forced to sell way before the system broke!!

R

Quote from: binggo on March 29, 2020, 12:47:03 AM
Quote from: R on March 28, 2020, 11:41:39 PM
The consequence of  global settlement already applies to bitasset holders; their held bitassets have depreciated significantly in value & they cannot be settled for the correct accurate value. Fixed feeds are not normal prices.

You misundertand something or not undertand something.

A bitasset is just like a country, now you shut down it, kill all the debtor(incloud healthy debtor),  people will choose to run away, no liquidity output, just make matters worse.

Global settlement is a very failed mechanism, it has been proved by the reality.

We should or must make a more better mechanism.
People are already running away from bitassets because they're SCAMS in their current state. Global settlement would have retained some resemblance of credibility, now BSIP76 proponents have zero credibility.

Fact is the bitassets are dead scamcoins, move onto new smartcoins which haven't been destroyed by loser gamblers.

binggo

Quote from: R on March 28, 2020, 11:41:39 PM
The consequence of  global settlement already applies to bitasset holders; their held bitassets have depreciated significantly in value & they cannot be settled for the correct accurate value. Fixed feeds are not normal prices.

You misundertand something or not undertand something.

A bitasset is just like a country, now you shut down it, kill all the debtor(incloud healthy debtor),  people will choose to run away, no liquidity output, just make matters worse.

Global settlement is a very failed mechanism, it has been proved by the reality.

We should or must make a more better mechanism.


R

Quote from: binggo on March 28, 2020, 10:35:17 PM
Quote from: R on March 28, 2020, 01:20:25 PM
Quote from: binggo on March 24, 2020, 11:43:21 PM
Ok, let's check the others how to design the stable coin, how to to prevent bad debt.

Maybe this can awaken someone.

MOV Stable Financial System

https://cdn.bytom.io/res/MOV-Stable-EN.pdf
Another NON solution. The solution was global settlement. Stop evading the consequences of bad gambling. BSIP76 shames CNY on an international level.

The global settlement is not the solution, it's will give more worse result to the normal debtor and holder, bitgold,bitbtc,bitsilver had been global settlement very long time, it didn't solve any problems.

Bonds give a choice to holders of biassets, and didn't need to bear too much dangerous, help to solve the bad debts getting the interest from the Bonds, or just want to wait the market giving a choice or surprise.
feed price will still be normal price.

The consequence of global settlement already applies to bitasset holders; their held bitassets have depreciated significantly in value & they cannot be settled for the correct accurate value. Fixed feeds are not normal prices.

binggo

#10
Quote from: R on March 28, 2020, 01:20:25 PM
Quote from: binggo on March 24, 2020, 11:43:21 PM
Ok, let's check the others how to design the stable coin, how to to prevent bad debt.

Maybe this can awaken someone.

MOV Stable Financial System

https://cdn.bytom.io/res/MOV-Stable-EN.pdf
Another NON solution. The solution was global settlement. Stop evading the consequences of bad gambling. BSIP76 shames CNY on an international level.

The global settlement is not the solution, it's will give more worse result to the normal debtor and holder, bitgold,bitbtc,bitsilver had been global settlement very long time, it didn't solve any problems.

Bonds give a choice to holders of biassets, and didn't need to bear too much dangerous, help to solve the bad debts getting the interest from the Bonds, or just want to wait the market giving a choice or surprise.
feed price will still be normal price.

R

Quote from: binggo on March 24, 2020, 11:43:21 PM
Ok, let's check the others how to design the stable coin, how to to prevent bad debt.

Maybe this can awaken someone.

MOV Stable Financial System

https://cdn.bytom.io/res/MOV-Stable-EN.pdf
Another NON solution. The solution was global settlement. Stop evading the consequences of bad gambling. BSIP76 shames CNY on an international level.

binggo

Ok, let's check the others how to design the stable coin, how to to prevent bad debt.

Maybe this can awaken someone.

MOV Stable Financial System

https://cdn.bytom.io/res/MOV-Stable-EN.pdf

Thom

#7
Quote from: xeroc on October 30, 2018, 01:33:16 PM
IMHO, those that go short with too little collateral shouldn't be bailed out by "profits" of everyone else.
Instead, I do believe they should be "punished" to an extend because they leave the bitasset at a risk by not maintaining their collateral.

Well said Xeroc!

I'm in total agreement. To do so actually rewards bad behavior by those who break the rules or don't care at all about the integrity of BitShares. Their priority is on something else (making money for themselves). Is that the type of person that should be rewarded?
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere - MLK |  Verbaltech2 Witness Reports: [url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23902.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23902.0.html[/url]

xeroc

IMHO, those that go short with too little collateral shouldn't be bailed out by "profits" of everyone else.
Instead, I do believe they should be "punished" to an extend because they leave the bitasset at a risk by not maintaining their collateral.

fractalnode

Quote from: bench on October 22, 2018, 02:13:57 PM
@FractalNode: You want to use fees to pay interest ?

it would be necessary to make some calculations first, but yes
for everyone who keeps at least 100 bitUSD maybe more, and bitCNY of course also for bitAssets shorters 50/50
passive income is a growing trend in crypto space and will become more and more important. IMO it's time to start working to be in this circle
imagine at least 30% of unique accounts holding at least 100 bitUSD and 690 bitCNY and the effect it has on the BTS price

Quote
We can archive market peg by changing at first:
1. MCR
2. MSQR
http://docs.bitshares.org/bitshares/user/dex-short.html

The difference of feed price and DEX price should be seen in context of EMA and DEX Price.

I would not mess with those parameters as long as possible

bench

#4
@armin: You are right. Problem is liquidity reduction and lowering the feed price will also lower the MCR.

@FractalNode: You want to use fees to pay interest ?

We can archive market peg by changing at first:
1. MCR
2. MSQR
http://docs.bitshares.org/bitshares/user/dex-short.html

The difference of feed price and DEX price should be seen in context of EMA and DEX Price.
Be part of the change and vote for the bitshares-vision proxy!

fractalnode

#3
in my opinion, we should redirect revenue from the transaction fee that is currently being transferred into the committee-trade account and return it to MPA Shorters (and MPA holders), at the same time we should start implementing BSIP 0019 and BSIP 0020. These features should be the heart of BitShares from the very beginning available to every user.

related thread
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26072.msg321168#msg321168