AGS and PTS are like having two children.
I can't imagine favoring one over another.
But remember, each represents a constituency that DAC developers will wish to court.
One gained their stake by mining or purchasing. The other by funding real infrastructure.
Will developers wish to attract the support of one group more than the other?
We'll see what the market decides!
What's the expectation about third party DAC's distributing to AGS holders? I'd understood that a TPDAC needed to distribute 10% to PTS holders to enjoy 3I support - but is there some expectation wrt AGS now too?
I'm looking at this graphic - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325261.msg6165896#msg6165896
Yes, that is the Social Consensus we have been advocating - 10% to each.
We have also stated that this is in every developer's best interest
. Many current posts are discussing how best to target shares in a new DAC to reach the right demographic. People who will support the DAC and not simply sell the shares for Pizza. It's been hard to define a precision targeting list hasn't it?
- PTS is a demographic of people who have proven they won't grab and dump (since anyone who grabbed and dumped is no longer a PTS holder) That's solid commitment!
- AGS is a demographic of people who have proven they will donate to the cause of deploying more insanely great DACs. That's max commitment!
What other groups of people are better to target with some of a new DAC's shares?
So, it's all about what's in a DAC developer's best interests. It has nothing to do with I3, since we hold only a small share of PTS and AGS - like everybody else. (And hopefully a developer wants our support for more reasons than that!)