Should we allocate more shares for the AGSer in the coming DACs, let us say not 50/50 for PTS/AGS, but 60/40, 70/30...., coz i think the AGSer shows more support and confidence for the project ,without the AGSer, the crowdfunding would not such successful as we are seeing now, the AGSer contributes more for 3I, even for the DAC industry. there is a Chinese proverb:get more pay for more work done.
This decision must be made by the developers
of each new DAC based upon their marketing and business plans.
As long as they treat both PTS and AGS equally with the first 10% each, they have honored the Social Consensus.
Now, they need to tune the remaining 80% to make their DAC successful. If they need to attract donations, then emphasize a pool of proven patron donors - like AGS. If they want to attract people who buy and hold liquid shares in the whole industry, or a specialized industry sector, then emphasize a deal tuned for PTS or one of its proto-children.
Whatever they choose, they must remember to ask what opportunity they are leaving open for their competitors to fork some other, "better" mix.
In the end, smart developers will do whatever gives them the best competitive edge for their new DAC.
Market forces rule.