Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: Preserving initial delegate name  (Read 528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Preserving initial delegate name
« on: June 13, 2014, 08:45:14 AM »

Is there an issue with using the initial delegate name (the one with initial-delegate-xx) in the future and even for the real network?



Offline toast

Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2014, 02:59:48 PM »
Is there an issue with using the initial delegate name (the one with initial-delegate-xx) in the future and even for the real network?

We made them "nameless" specifically to get them voted out ASAP in favor of people who actually campaign.
Does that answer your question? I'm not sure what you meant.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2014, 03:07:35 PM »
init-delegate-1 seems like a rather good name.
I was wondering If I should use it.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12339
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2014, 05:51:17 PM »
Its an anonymous delegate .. no trust in who powers it ... so why keep the votes on him if there are people running delegate that you do trust
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2014, 09:27:45 PM »
Because I have its private keys.
It will no longer be anonymous - I'll be behind it. (Site and other info is WIP, I just have to pick up a name)
It was just assigned to me by luck. (or the fact that I saw the thread asking for delegates early enough... or by other unknown to me reasons)
Anyway I was just thinking about a new delegate name and one of the options was to go a bit "lazy" - sticking with "init-delegate-1".
That seems like a good idea but I need some more opinions on this.

Offline bytemaster

Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2014, 09:41:14 PM »
Because I have its private keys.
It will no longer be anonymous - I'll be behind it. (Site and other info is WIP, I just have to pick up a name)
It was just assigned to me by luck. (or the fact that I saw the thread asking for delegates early enough... or by other unknown to me reasons)
Anyway I was just thinking about a new delegate name and one of the options was to go a bit "lazy" - sticking with "init-delegate-1".
That seems like a good idea but I need some more opinions on this.

Do what you like :) No technical reason not to keep it.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 958
    • View Profile
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2014, 06:08:37 AM »
init-delegate-1 seems like a rather good name.
I was wondering If I should use it.

init-delegate-1 is a horrible name.  Vote for init-delegate-62, init-delegate-63, init-delegate-64, and init-delegate-65 instead. ;)

...Do I get the dubious honor of first DPOS delegate smear campaign, or did someone beat me to it?

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2014, 06:21:33 AM »
nope, I think you are first.
I've seen people using "vote for X" but you are the first to use "vote for X instead Y, because X is horrible".
I'll try not to be that lazy and come up with better name.

Offline bytemaster

Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2014, 02:18:14 PM »
init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2014, 08:25:26 PM »
init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)
votes on the test network doesnt matter anyway. Arent the initial votes predefined by you ?


Offline bytemaster

Re: Preserving initial delegate name
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2014, 11:29:22 PM »
init-delegate-1 was the first to be voted out :)
votes on the test network doesnt matter anyway. Arent the initial votes predefined by you ?

They are defined by who ever launches the DAC.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

 

Google+