Dry Run 7: The Power of DPOS

[dexinwong]

I am waiting for Windows GUI. :)

[bytemaster]

This is me right now....   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM5EYO5wWMA#t=118

[vikram]

Some command changes:

Code Select Expand


renamed wallet_enable_delegate_block_production -> wallet_delegate_set_block_production
renamed wallet_withdraw_delegate_pay -> wallet_delegate_withdraw_pay
added wallet_delegate_set_transaction_scanning: if you want to live dangerously


[liondani]

+5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

something like that...

PS What think you about our concerns bytemaster?

Neither of those constraints stop me from making many delegates...

It must be not only money depended if possible...

....and having many delegates is not an attack since they still have to get voted in.
In other words, who cares, and why?

I disagree. I will  explain tomorrow my reasoning's with examples...

PS theoretical you are right of course

[toast]

the new wallet looks absolutely unreal!

Cass's magic touch  ;)

[clout]

the new wallet looks absolutely unreal!

[bytemaster]

+5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

something like that...

PS What think you about our concerns bytemaster?

I think the main issue with this type of restriction is that someone trying to damage the system will just write it out of their clients.  My understanding is that a node rebroadcasting a block looks exactly like a delegate broadcasting it for the first time.  If for no other reason we should maintain that semi anonymity for delegates to prevent DDOS attacks from crippling the system.

+1 

It is all about getting the approval to stay in. 

[puppies]

+5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

something like that...

PS What think you about our concerns bytemaster?

I think the main issue with this type of restriction is that someone trying to damage the system will just write it out of their clients.  My understanding is that a node rebroadcasting a block looks exactly like a delegate broadcasting it for the first time.  If for no other reason we should maintain that semi anonymity for delegates to prevent DDOS attacks from crippling the system.

[toast]

+5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

something like that...

PS What think you about our concerns bytemaster?

Neither of those constraints stop me from making many delegates, and having many delegates is not an attack since they still have to get voted in.

In other words, who cares, and why?

[liondani]

+5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

something like that...

PS What think you about our concerns bytemaster?

[sfinder]

wallet_transfer 111 XTS chinese a1 "mmmmm"
    BLK.TRX  TIMESTAMP           FROM                TO                  AMOUNT              FEE                 MEMO                                   ID     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   PENDING   2014-07-02T01:05:36 chinese             a1                  111.00000 XTS       0.10000 XTS         mmmmm                                  6343a789

Can you send some XTS to me for testing dry run 7?

Code Select Expand

mywallet (unlocked) >>> wallet_account_create jeffreylee
"XTS5i1eWiWThrZgYVjNruQZuZW2vQKZtjEeZjRJMqev3S9XnheFw9"

[sfinder]

 +5% +5%
max one delegate per client and Max 5 delegates per IP

would it be better for the original BTSX chain that
1 node = max 1 delegate ?
Because someone he don't "respect" money(for a reason/plan) and want to harm bitshares (especially at the beginning) would spam the network with hundreds of delegates (not with the same name of-course) and control at the end in some point the network... Am I missing something?


PS + it will be not fair for the poor delegates....

[JeffreyLee]

sent

Thx +5% :)

[liondani]

would it be better for the original BTSX chain that
1 node = max 1 delegate ?  (or max y delegates)
Because someone he don't "respect" money(for a reason/plan) and want to harm bitshares (especially at the beginning) would spam the network with hundreds of delegates (not with the same name of-course) and control at the end in some point the network... Am I missing something?


PS + it will be not fair for the poor delegates....
PS2 I saw the last days so much delegates from "init" that's why I was thinking about it.... If somebody has so much delegates compared with the network, even if he has the worst equipment, statistically he will sign the most of the total blocks (all from same delegates owner)

[laow]

  +5% 

can't wait to see the formal release.