0.4.11 Testers Wanted (not mandatory)

Started by bytemaster, September 01, 2014, 04:18:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


xeroc

Quote from: liondani on September 03, 2014, 06:31:41 PM
Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:26:59 PM

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

+5% +5% +5%

nice to have active delegates like nathan  ;)
s/delegates/developers/
:P

liondani

Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:26:59 PM

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

+5% +5% +5%

nice to have active delegates like nathan  ;)
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

xeroc

Quote from: bytemaster on September 03, 2014, 05:06:50 PM
Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:06:04 PM
Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Confirmed.
Nice ...

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

bytemaster

Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:06:04 PM
Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Confirmed.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

xeroc

Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Riverhead

Updated my old Thinkpad Core2Duo laptop with RC1. Before it was crashing a few times while it churned through the blockchain transaction scan but this time smooth as butter. The chain updated quickly but the transaction scanning is taking forever. Not a fault of the client, just a slow ass machine. So far zero stability issues with any RC1 client on any of my machines in any environment.

modprobe

Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Riverhead

I left my Linux GUI on over night (Idle for about six hours) and it was fine this morning. Other than some cosmetic issues this release has mostly been flawless.


Only Issue: Sometimes the title bar menus (File Account) disappear and I can't exit the client. I've tried stop, exit, etc. from the console but they do not work. When I go out to a shell and kill the process it reports a seg fault. I'll see if I can reproduce running in gdb.

xeroc

Quote from: pc on September 03, 2014, 08:55:08 AM
Looks good so far... this is the first version that hasn't crashed on me soon after starting, and it's been running for hours now. :-)
+5% +5% yeeeeeha

As promised ... devs are fixing the crashing issues :)

pc

Looks good so far... this is the first version that hasn't crashed on me soon after starting, and it's been running for hours now. :-)
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 [url="http://bitcoin.quisquis.de"]http://bitcoin.quisquis.de[/url]

huzhuzhu

 +5% +5% +5% +5%

supporting and will try it on my local pc

tonyk

Quote from: Riverhead on September 02, 2014, 03:11:48 PM
Anyone else have this issue with the Linux GUI? Doesn't do it in the 0.4.10 Windows binary. I have only built the gui on Ubuntu. Notice the LARGE amount of white space between the graph and the order fields.




Yes, but I think on Linux it has larger spaces between fields than Windows  in 0.4.10 too.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Riverhead

Anyone else have this issue with the Linux GUI? Doesn't do it in the 0.4.10 Windows binary. I have only built the gui on Ubuntu. Notice the LARGE amount of white space between the graph and the order fields.



xeroc

Quote from: svk on September 02, 2014, 09:50:10 AM
I also noticed another nice addition: 30 retries to bind the httpd port when you launch with --server. This is excellent cause I would often need to open then kill then restart the client in order to get it to bind to the correct port. Good job devs!
Yhea .. I was wondering about that too .. nice to see it fixed ..

svk

Quote from: wackou on September 02, 2014, 07:59:29 AM
Runs stable for me (for the last 10 hours or so), lots of connections (160, although set to 20 desired, not that it matters really, the more the better 8) ) and uses half the memory of 0.4.10!

Your comments about memory usage made switch over the bitsharesblocks client, as it was using almost 1gig of memory. With the new version from master it uses 500-600mb less than before, which is awesome!

I also noticed another nice addition: 30 retries to bind the httpd port when you launch with --server. This is excellent cause I would often need to open then kill then restart the client in order to get it to bind to the correct port. Good job devs!
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

svk

Running fine on my seednode as well, no crashes so far, have around 105 connections.
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

wackou

Runs stable for me (for the last 10 hours or so), lots of connections (160, although set to 20 desired, not that it matters really, the more the better 8) ) and uses half the memory of 0.4.10!
Please vote for witness wackou! More info at [url="http://digitalgaia.io"]http://digitalgaia.io[/url]

CoinHoarder

#35
fwiw 0.4.10 has been rock solid for me (linux cli build). 48 hours plus of no crashes.. about 24 hours longer than I've made it thus far.

The windows client is still pretty unstable though.
[url="https://www.decentralized.tech/"]https://www.decentralized.tech/[/url] -> Market Data, Portfolios, Information, Links, Reviews, Forums, Blogs, Etc.
[url="https://www.cryptohun.ch/"]https://www.cryptohun.ch/[/url] -> Tradable Blockchain Asset PvP Card Game

puppies

My seed node is up and running in gdb.  Currently with 140 connections.  I plan to run it overnight to see if it crashes with default settings.  If not I will increase maximum connections to 500 to give it a stress test.  If some other form of testing would be more advantageous, please advise.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

valzav

Quote from: maqifrnswa on September 01, 2014, 06:59:43 PM
Not really related to this testing but something I just noticed: I think the logic for choosing which delegate feed is expired in the gui might not be correct. I believe feeds should expire in 24 hours, but some feeds are red which are less than 24 hours old. It seems to be the feeds which were the previous day calendar day, not < 24 hours (unless we are now on a 12 hour cycle, in which case I need to change my script to make sure it updates at least every 12 hours).

Thank you. This bug is fixed https://github.com/BitShares/web_wallet/commit/a0dcce95798e8b7b2533e16d0299b81b5e3dc882

emski

Quote from: Riverhead on September 02, 2014, 01:12:08 AM
Quote from: emski on September 01, 2014, 07:35:37 PM
Looks stable so far.
I'll update delegates and seed node.

I've updated my seed/chain but not my Delegate. Are we supposed to? I've been waiting for a post to this thread:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7067.0

As it was written it is not mandatory. However it is better if someone tests this before release.
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

Riverhead

Quote from: emski on September 01, 2014, 07:35:37 PM
Looks stable so far.
I'll update delegates and seed node.


I've updated my seed/chain but not my Delegate. Are we supposed to? I've been waiting for a post to this thread:


https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7067.0


tonyk

Quote from: Riverhead on September 02, 2014, 12:59:47 AM
I'm testing the same one. I cloned it twice to be sure since the get_info says 0.4.10 but the tool_kit revision has a very new age.



{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "9 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 12:52:49"
}

Thanks. I am not that stupid after all.
I will erase the scratched text above then...the sad thing is I just  found/recovered all my balances, saved and then  made some decent trades...and I cannot enjoy them... at least for a while... :)
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Riverhead

I'm testing the same one. I cloned it twice to be sure since the get_info says 0.4.10 but the tool_kit revision has a very new age.



{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "9 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 12:52:49"
}


tonyk

#28
Quote from: TheOnion on September 01, 2014, 10:43:18 PM
Forgot to post.
Clean build it on Ubuntu 14.10. Did not want to sync (gave it like 10 min with 7 connections).
So, copied the old database directory and now seem to work fine.
(Not-fillable shorts are not removed from the GUI of course... :)  )

I am an idiot....

Is this what I should be testing?
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 15:13:05"
}


Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.

Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

alt

Quote from: bytemaster on September 01, 2014, 05:01:36 PM
Quote from: trader on September 01, 2014, 04:56:40 PM
I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

There is a median price feed that overrules the average.
but the median price is about 34...
the filter seems work with command line,  not work with GUI

chono

maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

来自我的 HTC 802d 上的 Tapatalk

Weibo:Will_BTS

bitcoinerS

GUI wallet error trying to add favorite


RPC Server Error: In method 'wallet_add_contact_account': Assert Exception (10)



>>> get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 375910,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "7 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:38:40",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "100.00 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "256,062.98647 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "2.11692 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,919,942.21843 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 12,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 2 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:40:40",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "ca375209443ba0f9041039a55d7056b6b6dcd6a1",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/slava/.BitSharesX",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 5,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-09-01T23:38:47",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.111175,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "31 years  in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "1910-04-04T18:56:51",
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:38:40",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "100.00 %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": false,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
default (unlocked) >>> about
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 16:31:10"
}

>>> approve bitcoiners

tonyk

#24
Forgot to post.
Clean build it on Ubuntu 14.10. Did not want to sync (gave it like 10 min with 7 connections).
So, copied the old database directory and now seem to work fine.
(Not-fillable shorts are not removed from the GUI of course... :)  )

I am an idiot....

Is this what I should be testing?
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 15:13:05"
}


Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

speedy

Quote from: maqifrnswa on September 01, 2014, 06:58:45 PM
no changes to gui since 4.10 so far. to rebuild the gui you need to delete the htdocs then rebuild the web_wallet
$ rm -r programs/qt_wallet/htdocs
$ make buildweb


Or you can just do this:
make forcebuildweb

emski

Looks stable so far.
I'll update delegates and seed node.
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

tonyk

#21
Quote from: maqifrnswa on September 01, 2014, 06:58:45 PM
Quote from: TheOnion on September 01, 2014, 06:53:18 PM
Did somebody try the GUI?
If even a marginal improvements I will update my Linux to it
...not too many  bitBTC buyers anyway...so I as well might help the system that way, instead of trying to help start the bitBTC market.

[EDIT]
Please, I am newbie, can somebody post all the folders I gave to delete to have a fresh install in Ubuntu. Thanks.

no changes to gui since 4.10 so far. to rebuild the gui you need to delete the htdocs then rebuild the web_wallet
$ rm -r programs/qt_wallet/htdocs
$ make buildweb


Thanks for the code!

It should have at least the below, even though I got used to seeing not-fillable orders. What would be nice (and should be as easy as pie to change the '1h Avg. Price' to 'median price feed'), is seeing the median price feed without going to the console....


Quote from: bytemaster on September 01, 2014, 04:18:17 PM
0.4.11 testing is now open and has some critical networking updates in it.   

3) Market Order Book now filters out over-priced shorts.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

maqifrnswa

working fine so far, ubuntu 14.10

Not really related to this testing but something I just noticed: I think the logic for choosing which delegate feed is expired in the gui might not be correct. I believe feeds should expire in 24 hours, but some feeds are red which are less than 24 hours old. It seems to be the feeds which were the previous day calendar day, not < 24 hours (unless we are now on a 12 hour cycle, in which case I need to change my script to make sure it updates at least every 12 hours).
maintains an Ubuntu PPA: [url="https://launchpad.net/~showard314/+archive/ubuntu/bitshares"]https://launchpad.net/~showard314/+archive/ubuntu/bitshares[/url] [15% delegate] wallet_account_set_approval maqifrnswa true [50% delegate] wallet_account_set_approval delegate1.maqifrnswa true

maqifrnswa

#19
Quote from: TheOnion on September 01, 2014, 06:53:18 PM
Did somebody try the GUI?
If even a marginal improvements I will update my Linux to it
...not too many  bitBTC buyers anyway...so I as well might help the system that way, instead of trying to help start the bitBTC market.

[EDIT]
Please, I am newbie, can somebody post all the folders I gave to delete to have a fresh install in Ubuntu. Thanks.

no changes to gui since 4.10 so far. to rebuild the gui you need to delete the htdocs then rebuild the web_wallet
$ make forcebuildweb

(thanks trader)
maintains an Ubuntu PPA: [url="https://launchpad.net/~showard314/+archive/ubuntu/bitshares"]https://launchpad.net/~showard314/+archive/ubuntu/bitshares[/url] [15% delegate] wallet_account_set_approval maqifrnswa true [50% delegate] wallet_account_set_approval delegate1.maqifrnswa true

tonyk

#18
Did somebody try the GUI?
If even a marginal improvements I will update my Linux to it
...not too many  bitBTC buyers anyway...so I as well might help the system that way, instead of trying to help start the bitBTC market.

[EDIT]
Please, I am newbie, can somebody post all the folders I gave to delete to have a fresh install in Ubuntu. Thanks.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Riverhead

Seed/chain node updated without issue to 0.4.11.


the info in the client still says 0.4.10 though...I'm guessing it just wasn't updated.

king

BTSX Account: mister
BTSX Delegate :sun.delegate.service,moon.delegate.service

sfinder

微博:星在飘我在找|BTS X 受托人delegate ID:baidu
和中国教育书店合作将20%收入捐献给贫困山区学生。
Cooperating with China Education Bookstore and will donate 20% of delegate income to the poor students

theoretical

Quote from: cgafeng on September 01, 2014, 04:23:03 PM
this is publish too much...

People complain when there are too many bugs.  Then people complain when you make a new release to fix bugs.

The technology is fundamentally sound, and I'm confident that bugs will be worked out.  I think what's most important is holding off marketing efforts until things have settled down, otherwise the state of the client may hurt the coin's reputation.
BTS- theoretical / PTS- PZxpdC8RqWsdU3pVJeobZY7JFKVPfNpy5z / BTC- 1NfGejohzoVGffAD1CnCRgo9vApjCU2viY / the delegate formerly known as drltc / Nothing said on these forums is intended to be legally binding / All opinions are my own unless otherwise noted / Take action due to my posts at your own risk

Xeldal

Quote from: trader on September 01, 2014, 05:05:26 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on September 01, 2014, 05:01:36 PM
Quote from: trader on September 01, 2014, 04:56:40 PM
I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

There is a median price feed that overrules the average.

Does the gui show the median price feed then? Also I still see overlapping on the bid/ask wall, which is confusing. Are you going to filter that in the future as well?

blockchain_get_feeds_for_asset USD
last entry MARKET shows "median_price": 0.0292277 USD/BTSX
or 34.214 BTSX/USD

yinchanggong

BTSX delegate: google.helloworld    microsoft.helloworld
BTSX Account:yinchg   Manager of BTSXCHINA Charity Fund
[url=http://weibo.com/u/1764434885]引长弓Fate 新浪微博[/url]

speedy

Quote from: bytemaster on September 01, 2014, 05:01:36 PM
Quote from: trader on September 01, 2014, 04:56:40 PM
I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

There is a median price feed that overrules the average.

Does the gui show the median price feed then? Also I still see overlapping on the bid/ask wall, which is confusing. Are you going to filter that in the future as well?

bytemaster

Quote from: trader on September 01, 2014, 04:56:40 PM
I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

There is a median price feed that overrules the average.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

ripplexiaoshan

It's running on main chain or testing chain?
BTS committee member:jademont

speedy

I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

Riverhead

Quote from: emski on September 01, 2014, 04:35:24 PM
Doesn't seem to be syncrhonizing at all.
Fresh data dir.
I have a lot of connections but it doesn't attempt to syncrhonize.

Update: Well it started now. For some reason it waited for a minute before starting sync


Is the directory updating? I found it shows "No connections" when using a chain server...

Riverhead

Building. Had to do a fresh clone.  git pull didn't do a new compile.  Oh well, probably good to refresh anyway :) . So far so good.

emski

Doesn't seem to be syncrhonizing at all.
Fresh data dir.
I have a lot of connections but it doesn't attempt to syncrhonize.

Update: Well it started now. For some reason it waited for a minute before starting sync
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

x.ebit

Delegate x.ebit, rose.ebit
Founder of BitRose

bytemaster

Quote from: cgafeng on September 01, 2014, 04:23:03 PM
this is publish too much...

This is not a mandatory update.  This is not a 0.4.11 release... this is for testers only. 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

cgafeng

BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376

bytemaster

#1
0.4.11 testing is now open and has some critical networking updates in it.   

Please checkout the master branch.

https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx

1) Resolves connect/disconnect bug
2) Improve networking performance
3) Market Order Book now filters out over-priced shorts.
4) Reduce some logging.

It is important for seed nodes to upgrade.
No hard forks (that we know of) for this release.

This update is NOT MANDATORY and this thread is only for those who would like to help in testing.   
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.