0.4.11 Testers Wanted (not mandatory)

Started by bytemaster, September 01, 2014, 04:18:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


xeroc

Quote from: liondani on September 03, 2014, 06:31:41 PM
Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:26:59 PM

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

+5% +5% +5%

nice to have active delegates like nathan  ;)
s/delegates/developers/
:P

liondani

Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:26:59 PM

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

+5% +5% +5%

nice to have active delegates like nathan  ;)
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

xeroc

Quote from: bytemaster on September 03, 2014, 05:06:50 PM
Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:06:04 PM
Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Confirmed.
Nice ...

@modprobe: welcome to the forum ... nice to have you here!

bytemaster

Quote from: xeroc on September 03, 2014, 05:06:04 PM
Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Confirmed.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

xeroc

Quote from: modprobe on September 03, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Could some other dev please confirm that 'modprobe' is nathan?

Riverhead

Updated my old Thinkpad Core2Duo laptop with RC1. Before it was crashing a few times while it churned through the blockchain transaction scan but this time smooth as butter. The chain updated quickly but the transaction scanning is taking forever. Not a fault of the client, just a slow ass machine. So far zero stability issues with any RC1 client on any of my machines in any environment.

modprobe

Quote from: chono on September 02, 2014, 12:13:48 AM
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

I maintain Docker images of BitSharesX. These are available at https://hub.docker.com/u/nathanhourt/ Note that nathanhourt/bitsharesx is probably the most interesting to others, but I also have an image which is preconfigured to run a chain server here.

Riverhead

I left my Linux GUI on over night (Idle for about six hours) and it was fine this morning. Other than some cosmetic issues this release has mostly been flawless.


Only Issue: Sometimes the title bar menus (File Account) disappear and I can't exit the client. I've tried stop, exit, etc. from the console but they do not work. When I go out to a shell and kill the process it reports a seg fault. I'll see if I can reproduce running in gdb.

xeroc

Quote from: pc on September 03, 2014, 08:55:08 AM
Looks good so far... this is the first version that hasn't crashed on me soon after starting, and it's been running for hours now. :-)
+5% +5% yeeeeeha

As promised ... devs are fixing the crashing issues :)

pc

Looks good so far... this is the first version that hasn't crashed on me soon after starting, and it's been running for hours now. :-)
Bitcoin - Perspektive oder Risiko? ISBN 978-3-8442-6568-2 [url="http://bitcoin.quisquis.de"]http://bitcoin.quisquis.de[/url]

huzhuzhu

 +5% +5% +5% +5%

supporting and will try it on my local pc

tonyk

Quote from: Riverhead on September 02, 2014, 03:11:48 PM
Anyone else have this issue with the Linux GUI? Doesn't do it in the 0.4.10 Windows binary. I have only built the gui on Ubuntu. Notice the LARGE amount of white space between the graph and the order fields.




Yes, but I think on Linux it has larger spaces between fields than Windows  in 0.4.10 too.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Riverhead

Anyone else have this issue with the Linux GUI? Doesn't do it in the 0.4.10 Windows binary. I have only built the gui on Ubuntu. Notice the LARGE amount of white space between the graph and the order fields.



xeroc

Quote from: svk on September 02, 2014, 09:50:10 AM
I also noticed another nice addition: 30 retries to bind the httpd port when you launch with --server. This is excellent cause I would often need to open then kill then restart the client in order to get it to bind to the correct port. Good job devs!
Yhea .. I was wondering about that too .. nice to see it fixed ..