Look here: http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae
Compare AGS balance with DNS balance. There is an obvious discrepancy in the numbers which doesn't appear to exist for other addresses which have AGS.
The mistake is persisting for each new DAC's genesis block it seems.
(The genesis block for LTS also had a discrepancy for this address - I first asked about these discrepancies in June, but nobody seems to have an answer.)
I've started a topic like this elsewhere, (e.g. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9510.0
) but hope for more visibility here, because I'm so perplexed...
It's niggling me, so I may keep mentioning it until someone tells me to shut up, or some kind of answer is obtained!
Any ideas - what's going on?
In the previous link there was mention of a reward for checking AGS allocations.
I think we need a definitive record of distribution, if there isn't one which is sufficient/correct.