Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: Is anyone monitoring the [email protected] address?  (Read 609 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.






Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile
they got my balance totally wrong, pm cob but no response till now.
?
How? Which balance?

1Ggfyb5HN6Eb7S5j3zax3NpQ4V6ZWStHeh
donated 1.5 btc, only showing balance for 1 btc. check btc blockchain tho. the balance is wrong!

It shows about 226,661.32 NOTES  from the IPO,which is about right for 1.5 BTCs.
And plus those are display issues, by the time of the actual distribution you will be fine, I hope.

[edit] It seems that there is about 1000 Notes error indeed.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 05:28:10 AM by tonyk »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12175
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH

Offline boombastic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
    • AngelShares Explorer
@kickky, I've just updated the balance page listing detailed donation history/calculation.  Please verify again.

http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/1Ggfyb5HN6Eb7S5j3zax3NpQ4V6ZWStHeh

Your up-to-now total BTC donation is 1.5092BTC with NOTE reward 226,661.32NOTE.  It seems correct to me based on each day's total donation amount.

@tonyk, you mentioned it seems to be 1000 NOTEs error, can you share your finding?  I am happy to fix any bugs in the page.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 08:04:30 AM by boombastic »
http://bitshares.dacplay.org/r/boombastic
Support My Witness: mr.agsexplorer
BTC: 1Bb6V1UStz45QMAamjaX8rDjsnQnBpHvE8

Offline testz

@kickky, I've just updated the balance page listing detailed donation history/calculation.  Please verify again.

Your up-to-now total BTC donation is 1.5092BTC with NOTE reward 226,661.32NOTE.  It seems correct to me based on each day's total donation amount.

@tonyk, you mentioned it seems to be 1000 NOTEs error, can you share your finding?  I am happy to fix any bugs in the page.

Click on the bar at BitShares Nusic donation charts goes to AGS donation, can you fix it?

Offline boombastic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
    • AngelShares Explorer
@kickky, I've just updated the balance page listing detailed donation history/calculation.  Please verify again.

Your up-to-now total BTC donation is 1.5092BTC with NOTE reward 226,661.32NOTE.  It seems correct to me based on each day's total donation amount.

@tonyk, you mentioned it seems to be 1000 NOTEs error, can you share your finding?  I am happy to fix any bugs in the page.

Click on the bar at BitShares Nusic donation charts goes to AGS donation, can you fix it?

fixed, thanks.
http://bitshares.dacplay.org/r/boombastic
Support My Witness: mr.agsexplorer
BTC: 1Bb6V1UStz45QMAamjaX8rDjsnQnBpHvE8

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12175
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BTS: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
@kickky, I've just updated the balance page listing detailed donation history/calculation.  Please verify again.

Your up-to-now total BTC donation is 1.5092BTC with NOTE reward 226,661.32NOTE.  It seems correct to me based on each day's total donation amount.

@tonyk, you mentioned it seems to be 1000 NOTEs error, can you share your finding?  I am happy to fix any bugs in the page.

Click on the bar at BitShares Nusic donation charts goes to AGS donation, can you fix it?

fixed, thanks.
wow .. awesome job! +5%
Give BitShares a try! Use the http://testnet.bitshares.eu provided by http://bitshares.eu powered by ChainSquad GmbH


Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile

@tonyk, you mentioned it seems to be 1000 NOTEs error, can you share your finding?  I am happy to fix any bugs in the page.

Code: [Select]
Date Date Total Sent Amount Expected Notes
10/07 39.459149 0.5 63,356.66
10/08 32.59680 0.5091 78,090.49
10/11 28.81831 0.5 86,750.40

Sum 228,197.55
Actual per AGSExplorer 226,661.32NOTE


I see what it might be:
per blockchain.info one of the donations is on  2014-10-08 23:46:44
agsexplorer considers it on the 9th of October...
« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 04:49:47 PM by tonyk »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline boombastic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
    • AngelShares Explorer
You are right @tonyk. The 0.5092BTC is sent at 2014-10-08 23:46:44 and included into block #324470 at 2014-10-09 00:10:26.  So it's as 10-09 donation.

By the way, how did you generate the data table?  From blockchain.info API?  blockchain.info uses transaction time instead of block time, the result will be different.  It's ok to use it to have an rough idea of the donation progress though @unsoindovo.

Thanks.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 05:14:01 PM by boombastic »
http://bitshares.dacplay.org/r/boombastic
Support My Witness: mr.agsexplorer
BTC: 1Bb6V1UStz45QMAamjaX8rDjsnQnBpHvE8

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3309
    • View Profile
You are right @tonyk. The 0.5092BTC is sent at 2014-10-08 23:46:44 and included into block #324470 at 2014-10-09 00:10:26.  So it's as 10-09 donation.

By the way, how did you generate the data table?  From blockchain.info API?  blockchain.info uses transaction time instead of block time, the result will be different.  It's ok to use it to have an rough idea of the donation progress though @unsoindovo.

Thanks.

One learns something new every day. I did not know blockchain.info uses transaction time, NOT  block time.
Quote
By the way, how did you generate the data table? From blockchain.info API?
No, I did it by hand.

Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

 

Google+