Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hansonwcn

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
General Discussion / Re: BitShares X Status Update
« on: April 19, 2014, 03:04:51 pm »
The biggest problem right now is the 28 Feb snapshot. As we get farther away from the date, it keeps looking worse (and is generating a lot of heartache amongst investors) and creating more pressure on Dan and co.
Yep, it really annoys me.

Having value trap in a black hole during an undetermined period of time was not part of the deal. Having value stuck is reeeeally annoying, especially in the cryptospace where things move very fast. If I didn't mind having my value be illiquid I would have buy more AGS, my portfolio was skewed toward PTS for a reason.

Is having your AGS being illiquid for 2-3 months really the end of the world? You know your returns are going to be huge once the product is released. The only thing Im annoyed about is that I didnt donate more.
No, I don't know my returns are gonna be huge, especially calculated in BTC. There are a ton of reasons why this can end up not be the case, the world is a very complex place, it's not because some smart people tell you they are gonna change the world and make you rich that that will actually happen.

Like I said if I don't mind having value illiquid I would have buy AGS instead of PTS. But I bought PTS, and my value is illiquid. That's really annoying.

Stan your parents probably responded to you "yeah soon" even when that wasn't true, but your investors are not person that you should feel comfortable treating like child.
Beside that, it raises the question: how have you end up underestimate so much the time you needed? Did you really think you could do in 15 days (February 28th => Ides of March) something you actually cannot do in maybe 45+ days? Should we always mentally triple the time when you speak about something in the future?
+5% +5%

That's why we stopped giving estimates.  We don't know what we don't know.  When our conventional mining solution for PTS pointed out that mining was centralizing and unprofitable, a new invention was necessary.  Our supporters have watched (and helped) us make that invention in real time - with access to every chin-scratching twist and turn of our thinking.  Is that not being treated like adults?

Here's the list of R&D progress we've made pursuing that invention, as summarized by bytemaster a week or so ago.  None of it could be anticipated until we did the work, thought the thoughts, listened to input from this forum, scratched our chins and engineered the required breakthroughs:

Quote
Yes, I released a white paper on DPOS last week and have implemented a large part of it and will be testing it in the days ahead.   Resolving the security model in a way that one can thoroughly understand and prove is secure was a major challenge.  You can follow discussions on this forum where about a half dozen variations / iterations where vetted and found wanting...  Let me list the evolution:

1) Mining with Momentum... tossed due to centralization and non profitability
2) Transactions as Proof of Stake white paper (Nov 28th, 2013) adjusted mining difficulty by stake.  Suffered from weakness on deciding who should produce the next block.
3) Ripple Consensus + TaPOS was the concept in January at the Miami event through Feb, but after attempted implementation we realized it had several deal breakers:
      a) the unique node list was an invite-only group and a point of trust
      b) the UNL was not compensated in any way
      c) the bandwidth requirements / scalability were an issue
4) Fall back on a simple mining + TaPOS and various variations on equations for option 2.  All of these variations suffered from many potential attacks and would require many confirmations.  It became too complex to analyze.  (Feb through March)
5) Single trustee which could be fired... the process was too manual but otherwise sound.
6) Delegated POS this solution has been reviewed, found to be decentralized, fast, and secure without ambiguity.  We have finally resolved the issue.

In that time we also identified problems and found solutions to several market manipulation attacks.  These need to be implemented, but then we should be good to go.

As you can see R&D is not predictable when you are at the bleeding edge of innovation and solving problems as they are discovered. 

We are now much, much stronger than we were then and the total industry value proposition is bigger than ever.

We know that you team make great efforts underground before the seed of Bitsahres sprouting, we as investor just want something visible to stronger our confidence and stop the useless urge.

32
中文 (Chinese) / Re: MaidSafe信息汇总(研讨群346100924)
« on: April 17, 2014, 03:26:31 am »
普通民众分不清它和百度云网盘 酷盘有啥区别 某些程度上会觉得还不如百度云网盘 酷盘来的安全 便捷
现在这批技术 都还存在一个怎样教育培养用户的关键问题
就像一开始人们也分不清比特币和Q币有啥区别
对技术保持灵敏是好事
但是在自己是否参与其中这件事上 得搞清自己想做先驱还是先烈。。

33
General Discussion / This investment makes people fickleness
« on: April 15, 2014, 05:42:04 pm »
This investment makes people fickleness
这场投资在使人变得浮躁

1. In fact, we haven't join to bitshares actually. All we have done were cast money more and more. It's very easy to find a lot of GUI programmer or some other programmer in China or somewhere else. BUT,THE REALITY is nobody recommend one programmer to BM,nobody.If you know someone has the ability, just recommend to BM. You are the Shareholder of BM, why not do everything you can do?
1. 说实话我们的确没有真正参与到bitshares这件事中去 我们现在都在做的唯一一件事就是无底洞的投钱投钱 搞个GUI的程序员或者类似的程序员中国是一抓一大把 其他国家也是 但实际情况就是没有一个人引荐给BM 一个都没有 如果你认识某个人认为他可以 就引荐给BM 你是BM的股东 有什么好客气的!


2. Assume that bitshares X release in tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, then the program have big problem or bug. According to  the efficiency of 3I now, the schedule will be so long that unimaginable, give 3I 3 months, 6 months to fix the bug again?
2. 退一步讲 假设 即使 明天 或者后天 bitshares X 发布了,之后,出现了较大的漏洞或bug,软件难免会有bug,以3I团队当前的生产力,这之后的事也会被拖得时间长的难以想象,出现大的bug,再给他3个月6个月去改?


3. Both BM and us are thinking of the decentralized of coding and network and so on. But have we think of the decentralized during the project development? How can we ensure that one person have such rigorous thinking to avoid any mistakes?
3. BM和我们都在考虑代码和网络等等的去中心化,但我们是否有考虑过这整个项目开发过程的去中心化?当所有期望都集中在某一个人身上时,我们如何能保证这一个人的思维慎密到没有任何纰漏?

Hope that 3I face up to this investment sincerely, we don't want this evolved into an irreparable scam.
希望3I正视这场投资,我们都不希望这演变成一场无法收拾的骗局。

34
General Discussion / PTS holdings survey
« on: April 13, 2014, 10:29:47 am »
PTS holdings survey  :P

35
General Discussion / AGS holdings survey
« on: April 13, 2014, 09:57:01 am »
AGS holdings survey  :P

36
The videos in bitshares.org can‘t connect in CHN for the reason of GFW(Do you know what I say?):) Do these vidoes use YouTube links?In some countries, Youtube & some other media websites are not availbe.
由于天朝大局域网的关系:) ,bitshares.org网站上的视频都看不到。是不是用了YouTube的链接?Youtube和一些其他的媒体网站在有些国家是看不到的~

This is not good for advertise Bitshares in some countries.
这不利于我大Bitshares在天朝的宣传啊.

37
General Discussion / About the coins & chips in the DACs
« on: April 01, 2014, 02:37:20 am »
About the coin & chips  in the DACs

    There are signs that many DAC developers intent to create new coins in their DAC systems.
 I don't think it's good for the BitSahares ecosystem.

    If every DAC has it's own coin, it becomes another "altcoin factory" and scattered the whole value of the BitShares ecosystem. It's not good for attracting  external capital.
    It will be more healthy if these DACs use bitUSD, bitCNY or something has "consensus value" as their chips to minimize the kinds of currency. Thus the whole values of the DACs ecosystem will be drived up.
    Of cause, all these based on the bitshares X.

    Maybe it exist better solution for this problem.

38
跨链交易有专家?加密货币领域之前还没出现过跨链交易吧?要专家也是块链交易领域。

39
云彩系统和BitShares LOTTO是不是有重复?按照现在两者的描述 重合度会很高啊

Pages: 1 2 [3]