Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
There has never been a period of history where peoplewerethink they are more free than they are now, and that trend will probably continue into the future.
New Banx Update Folks>> http://banxcapital.com/banx-update-2nd-aug-2015/
dead project.
Sorry? We stated we are waiting to move to the new 2.0 system when its available.
In hindsight, bitshares should have done the same with their first release.Quote from: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7962.0So this *GENERAL WARNING* is placed here as a caution to all:
BitShares is an industry under development.
You have a chance to participate in that development.
Its products are highly experimental, immature, and full of bugs.
They have been made available so early adopters can help test them.
They are likely to break on you at the worst possible time.
You should not trust them.
You should double check everything they do.
You should experiment with very small amounts before doing anything big.
You should not do anything big.
You should realize that what worked yesterday should be double-checked today.
We could wait until it is perfect before letting you participate.
But by then the rewards you might get would be reduced by as much as the risks.
That's why the disclaimer you accepted before you could first launch the software warned that the software comes with no guarantees to be good for anything at all.
Yeah @Stan why didn't you warn us?!
The test network has been delayed because we have a random crash in block production that we just now identified the cause of.
It took me 1M blocks to reproduce the issue on my local test net!
Somewhat disappointed but it's understandable. Can you tell ETA?
In order for an asset to be backed, the collateral backing the asset must be retrievable. A token cannot be backed by POW as collateral because the electricity cannot be retrieved, its network can only be secured by POW as a recurring cost.
Yet a token can be backed by BTS, even though the bitcoin / fiat used to buy it cannot be retrieved directly either?
They could always skip them. By randomizing that behavior will be more easily detected because the bad witness will follow a different witness every time.
That's too low level an explanation - what is the problem you aim to solve by randomising the order?
)
As bytemaster states it, "all value is perceived value". So people's perception about bitshares counts. If people will stay away from a crypto platform because somebody tries to sell cannabis on its forums, I am all for not allowing it. Simply this is not the place.
I really appreciate the explanations. I now have a better understanding of Bitshares.BitShares is centralized way from Dan and Stan to steal money.
P.S. I'am not a troll. That is exactly my experience.
Can you explain?
No, he can't. At least he is not corroborating his arguments with facts or evidence; also see his posts in the other threads.
Yes, progress is good. Yes, change is tough. But completely changing the monetary incentive to use a system to a new one that does not favor new investment is a scary proposition.
what changed? 20% goes to BTS if you are referring to the identabit sharedrop
The 20% is a lie. Its only 10%, of final supply. They are doing 20% of initial distribution but only 10% in reality, to make it look better.
Yes, progress is good. Yes, change is tough. But completely changing the monetary incentive to use a system to a new one that does not favor new investment is a scary proposition.
