THis sounds like a misunderstanding. I hope you guys don't have a falling out over it.

Cool!

Well it is a costly mistake, but as you can see I am not afraid of admitting fault: that's how we evolve and become better.

Noted. It's an impressive capability and in short supply on internet forums. Kudos.

The new setdefaultaddress lets you change the default address on your wallet . . . the process is

1. importmemorywallet / importprivkey
2. setdefaultaddress

Not in the binary yet, but soon!

>* exchange site.

I'm not sure how a new, untrusted exchange site will help much. They're difficult to secure, and take a long time to gain trust. This would be more helpful - https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2370.0

>* binary builds and full compability for linux/mac.

Yes, good idea. It'll be good to have binaries for different platforms available.

>* research on p2pool for a open-source mmc pool software.

If you can help FaSan with this, that would be good - our over-reliance on a single pool is a problem.

Thanks FaSan, I appreciate all the work you've done and are doing.

I think the main weakness with the network at the moment is the concentration of mining effort in a single pool. I know it is a tough problem to solve, but I think that is where you should be directing your efforts at the moment.

I've added a command-line switch, -multiaddress=1 to re-enable using multiple addresses. Also there's a new command, setdefaultaddress to change your default wallet address now. These are in the github source now, not in the binaries yet.

These should allow power users to continue using the wallet features that they've been used to.

FreeTrade, I'm sorry buddy, but I don't think you get how Bitcoin addresses are supposed to work. You should NOT think of them as an account. An address is NOT an account. Any time an address sends money it is supposed to be DISPOSED and the change from the transaction is supposed to go to a fresh newly minted address.

Asenski, I'm sorry buddy, but I don't think you get how MemoryCoin addresses are supposed to work. You should think of them as an account. An address is an account. Any time an address sends money it is supposed to send the change from the transaction back to the same address.

Sure, we're trading a little security for usability - but not much. I'm not aware of any examples of the attack you describe.

Blockchain.info uses this very approach with their wallets - so any vulnerability should show up there.

We're not just another clone coin - we're doing things to differentiate the coin - usability is one of them.

Thanks for your continued support in hiring me as you CEO. Here's what I've been doing over the past week or so -

- Testing the LiveUSB/CD, providing tip and feedback
- Hiring DEO MaxPwr
- DwarfPool incentives to encourage pool diversity
- Investment guide to lay out the case for investing in MemoryCoin
- Bundling YAM with wallet to make mining easy from GUI
- Wallet release to encourage 'one address=one wallet' model
- Co-ordinating move to allow zero-fee transactions on network
- Promoting cross-coin exchange idea
- Private discussions with exchanges about MC listing
- Testing YAM
- Creating Voting Panel for wallet
- Encouraging LiveUSB/CD project
- Creating guide for exchanges on Protoshares distribution
- Distributing large tips to GPU/CPU miner programmers

Generally engaging in discussions, distributing tips to helpful efforts, co-ordinating other CXOs.

If you haven't voted yet, please use the new voting panel to give me your first preference - it's really easy to use - my voting address is

MVTEceoTeDMmxFHcRbkMyJGN4ct7ULKkS6