还是支持得多～

从今往后，会多出来不少有技术含量的BTS黑... 

但也不是大部分都是黑的。反对也是有反对的原因的。关键如果作为一个团体，我觉得团结很重要啊。大家为什么不能一起把BTS搞起来。就是这个道理啊。任何一个新的革新变动，必然有反对的声音。况且不论信誉什么的。信誉在国外很重要，那民主呢？

建议BM以后再有疯狂想法都按我这个思路发帖子
先说明现在有什么问题或机会需要做出改变了，重点要把这些讲清楚，让股东们看到确实要改变，不改变就完蛋了。
然后给出几个方案，让股东们选，当然他应该把自己选中的那个方案描写的更有吸引力一点。这样不至于有这么大争议。

建议BM以后再有疯狂想法都按我这个思路发帖子

应该和BM直接反馈！

淡定，要支持就一直支持。比特币大跌了至少5次吧。3i合并不也是给你赔偿的么。

我想说的是，AGS单单计算AGS的回报率，我作为AGS和PTS其中小小的一员，已经知足了。已经是4倍多一点的回报率了。好就算你是0.00006时候抛的BTS，那也是2倍多的利润了。嫌少去北京找关系投个100万，每年给你个百分之20的分红。3i给你了什么自己知道。然后赚到钱了就骂爹骂娘了。把AGS换成BTS，你还能赚到钱的好不好。嫌赚的少去玩儿股票去，嫌赚的少，去玩儿彩票去。

在英文版的投票结果大家都看到了。我是看到这里的反对声音太大，那就事实说话。

Here is another version of bitsharesMusic logo

Hey Guys! PeerTracks already has it's logo for its or company.

Now what we don't have is a logo for either BitShares Music as a whole or just the Notes.

Might just have one work for both. Like Bitcoin's B is the logo to represent the units + the blockchain/network.

Any ideas?

Hey Cob

Here is my version idea of Note Logo

Just rough Idea, can fill up colors and finalize it once you approved my idea.

The N is the logo concept, idea comes from the notes symbol (red circle below)
Thanks

I have not received a message from Cob in some time and I see he has been posting on here, so I figured I'd get some feedback from you guys and what you think.

My concerns with this current model is that the DAC and Peertracks seems to be following an outdated model. That is a system where people buy music. People buying music online has begun to fall:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/digital-and-mobile/5855162/digital-music-sales-decrease-for-first-time-in-2013

I attribute this mostly due to the rise in streaming and the popularity of that model. But even then that is a centralized model that has treated artists unfairly due to the holding of intellectual property by large publishing companies, such as spotify distributing the revenues at different rates for artists in bigger labels.

This concept has the ability to change the game in that regard. Not only could we make a platform where every artist is paid at the same rate for the same merit but we could do it without advertising and therefore attract millions of listeners. Essentially, we should be looking at a platform that allows for people to invest in artists who distribute their music for free and then have the DAC protocol pay people according to how popular the artists are in the network. Let's be real here. Young people today buy music less and less and prefer to torrent it. However torrenting takes time and carries legal problems. If we can get this out of the way, we've stumbled on a gold mine. In addition, I think I've found a method in some old technology that would allow us to stream the music or download it. It's called Peercasting and functions like a P2P TCP server (if you're not a techie, that's basically the protocol that your Youtube videos use). This could further be enacted by having people sign off on whether a certain packet of data was distributed.

Another thing I've seen a lot of people bring up that you haven't addressed is the problem of people copying other people's music on the DAC and just taking it and distributing it. There's no way to get around that in the modern day and age, so why not build a protocol around the assumptions and encourage it in a way that allows artists and shareholders to profit? We could do this by creating a P2P database in the DAC protocol that would create audio fingerprints for songs uploaded and for each upload check the database to make sure it's not replicated. There are ways to do this on a decentralized, P2P basis.

I like the idea of artistcoins. I did not like them at first, but I have bought onto the concept so to say. However, I'm not sure there is a truly clear cut mechanism for how they would work. I would propose a mechanism in the frame that I have whereby holders of artistcoins hold the responsibility of distributing music over the network (they are the only ones allowed to seed). An artistcoin would then function as a key allowing people to distribute a set chunk of data per block processed and would then gather transaction fees per block according to how many artistcoins they have for that song/album.

In addition there is something that could be utilized that would really draw artists in. The ability for us to process where certain people are transacting from allows us to collect ip Addresses. If we utilize this we can help artists create a geographical map of where they should tour based upon total streams from different addresses. This essentially functions like an enterprise planning tool and it would bring many artists into the network.

Does anybody think this is a better system? Does anyone have any criticism they would like to levy at this? I want this to work and I just don't see it working on the current platform it is heading in.

 People buying music online has begun to fall because ppl dont want to pay and they want to get free stuff. however, peertracks you can profit. this is about a fan supports artists and gain huge profits. have you ever been to a concert or live show? Say MJ is alive, and he blogged those MJ fans should support him buy his peertrack coins, what you think would happen? that his fan would ignore his message or something else?