Mr. Li has seen posts and contacted us privately about the non-profit claim made by Stan. Obviously he was concerned, as was I, because the first I heard of it was when Mr. Li contacted me. Anyway it is clear that Stan, being an engineer and left alone to fend off forum fires while we were in Texas, stated things in a way that clearly demonstrated our commitment to not profit (directly) from AGS funds . Living in the realm of consideration for those who gave to AGS or own PTS can sometimes lose sight of I3 shareholders.
The reason why we actually don't concern ourselves with I3 shares much is because what is good for AGS and PTS is also good for I3 shareholders. There is no conflict of interest where we would take actions to benefit I3 shareholders at the expense of the community. In other words, I am using the funds provided by Mr. Li to generate the greatest returns I know how for him as if his funds were my own personal investment.
Think of Invictus as being a CEO who's only compensation is the stock he *BOUGHT* in his own company from the market. The reason Mr. Li has an an opportunity to profit from BTS X is because he funded Invictus in the first place. Part of what Mr. Li wanted was a coin with no pre-mine which means no advantage for us over everyone else in the ecosystem. This in turn translated into AGS being equal opportunity and Invictus having to mine, buy, or donate our way to 5% in competition with everyone else. This means that Mr. Li is a very generous man who put equal opportunity for everyone in the community ahead of maximizing his own return through a pre-mine.
We are therefore committed to maximizing the value of our 5% on behalf of Mr. Li.