Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitmeat

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 75
856
General Discussion / Re: Trade DACs on the NHZ blockchain (BTSX, LTS, PTS)
« on: July 20, 2014, 08:18:25 pm »
I'm not familiar with NXT, NHZ, etc. So, how about you make the onboarding process a little easier.

I like the idea, and this is not actually hard for me to figure out (I'm tech savvy), but how am I to expect that non-tech savvy people will be able to come in and trade?

A good exchange makes it easy for anyone to join. That's why I suggested a good step by step guide with screenshots. Ok -- off to the faucet now to try it out.

857
General Discussion / Re: Trade DACs on the NHZ blockchain (BTSX, LTS, PTS)
« on: July 20, 2014, 08:06:36 pm »
Quote from: pharesim on July 20, 2014, 08:01:24 pm
Will do that too, but not today. Was working on this nearly 24 hours straight now. Someone interested in a bounty? ;)

Check the FAQ (top left corner of the site) to clear the basics up.
You need to get some NHZ from the faucet to deposit. The reason for that is that you can't sell or even withdraw the assets if you don't have NHZ.

faucet is offline... so, you have no clear instructions, and you just point people to the FAQ. That's some stellar customer support. :)


858
General Discussion / Re: Trade DACs on the NHZ blockchain (BTSX, LTS, PTS)
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:57:08 pm »
I'm very confused. Can you put together a guide with screenshots for someone who say ONLY has BTSX, how would they deposit and trade it?

I can't get deposit address because I don't have a balance in my account? :) ... soooo how do I deposit?

Please do a step by step, you will gain a lot of traction if you do.

859
General Discussion / Re: Trade DACs on the NHZ blockchain (BTSX, LTS, PTS)
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:52:40 pm »
Quote from: pharesim on July 20, 2014, 07:49:28 pm
Added BTSX

So is it possible to see trade history / order books here at all?

860
General Discussion / Re: "asset_reg_fee": "151,295.55840 BTSX",
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:30:20 pm »
And where do the fees for creating assets and users go? To the delegates? Burn?

861
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] Memorycoin v3 in the Works
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:26:21 pm »
So what is the state of MMC these days? Is there going to be a hard fork or not?

862
General Discussion / Re: "asset_reg_fee": "151,295.55840 BTSX",
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:24:59 pm »
Does it like double every time you register a new one?

Also - I'm curious - where do the fees for registering go? I don't see them in the income or daily burn... Shouldn't they be just a burn, so that registering assets automatically increases the value of BTSX?

863
General Discussion / Re: Missing 30K - Help troubleshoot this.
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:06:36 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on July 20, 2014, 06:55:45 pm
The transaction with no memo for 20K is missing on receive side... very interesting. 

Does his ledger balance out with his account balance after a rescan?

I've instructed him to do a rescan as well. I think he was able to send the balance, but never saw it in the ledger.

I think he is also missing the transaction with 10K one of the "2nd batch" transactions - there are 2 with the same memo, but he got only one - look at TX ID on the right

864
General Discussion / Re: sum of approve for delegate over 100%
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:04:28 pm »
Listed a proposal here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5873

Not sure if this can be implemented after the fact, but I don't see why not (e.g. binaries are programmed that starting at block 50,000 - we implement this change)

865
General Discussion / Re: [CLOSED] Name the main currency in BTSX DAC
« on: July 20, 2014, 07:00:54 pm »
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=btsx

So... pronounced as Butt 6?

866
General Discussion / PROPOSAL: Chance for pending delegates
« on: July 20, 2014, 06:58:36 pm »
Why couldn't we have after every 100 elected delegates forge a block, give 1 block to a pending delegate as a chance to prove their worth / uptime / gather stats?

That way people can vote on pending delegates based on their stats, worse case scenario - we have 1 missing block every 100 blocks. But I'm sure pending delegates would never want to miss a block.

We could also select them randomly based on their current votes as a %.

867
General Discussion / Re: sum of approve for delegate over 100%
« on: July 20, 2014, 06:55:37 pm »
Delegates seem very centralized. It looks VERY different than during the dry run. Dry run was vibrant and diversified. Now it's all init delegates, and clout - I like you, man, but isn't running 5 delegates a bit greedy, and gives bad rep to BTSX.

868
General Discussion / Re: Missing 30K - Help troubleshoot this.
« on: July 20, 2014, 06:48:06 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on July 20, 2014, 06:40:15 pm
I think that we need to update the UI in the following way:

1) clear pending transactions should only hide the transactions (not remove them from the wallet)
2) When scanning the blockchain, we need to pick up transactions that are outgoing even if we lost information about who they were sent to... TITAN makes rescanning to restore history harder because it is just that private.

3) The balance shown for your account is based upon known spendable outputs and is the "true" balance after a rescan.   We are working to make sure the ledger accurately explains the true balance.

I see. Yes, even if it shows "lost encrypted transaction info" it's better than having discrepancies, which can be very confusing.

Also - and more concerning - there is a missing transaction in the ledger on the receiving side. I actually am not worried about my transactions missing, so long as he received them. I'm just trying to help here.

I'm thinking how would someone like BTER handle that? Will they just have receiving address, without an account name? Can they create unregistered receiving addresses - one per account, so that even if the tx info is lost, they still get the deposits?

869
General Discussion / Re: Missing 30K - Help troubleshoot this.
« on: July 20, 2014, 06:38:05 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on July 20, 2014, 06:34:35 pm
Here is what is going on:

He has received all transactions, but when you "re-scan" you do not detect outgoing transactions. 

So when you cleared pending transactions you deleted your knowledge of those transactions from your wallet.   His transaction record is accurate, your balance is accurate, but your transaction record is missing those 2 transactions.

Are you saying that unless I keep my local hard drive safe, I have no way of ever reconstructing the missing transactions in the ledger?

I mean if I export my wallet, then some transactions occur, then my hard drive dies , will I be able to re-create my account from scratch from that older wallet?
(This happened to me by the way and I lost 400 PTS during donation period, because I thought Qt PTS used the same change address, so my backup didn't work). I also hope your change addresses are deterministic.


870
General Discussion / Re: Missing 30K - Help troubleshoot this.
« on: July 20, 2014, 06:33:30 pm »
Quote from: Riverhead on July 20, 2014, 06:31:07 pm



Have you done a wallet_account_balance in the console to see if it's just a UI bug?

It's not just a UI bug, if you look at the post above there is a dump from wallet_account_transaction_history in the console.

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 75

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 20 queries.