361
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« on: December 30, 2013, 10:01:32 am »GPU for ATI chipsets?
Yes, only AMD with 2G and more RAM on the moment. Windows version to follow soon.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Yes, only AMD with 2G and more RAM on the moment. Windows version to follow soon.
362
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMC.1GH.COM - GPU mining
« on: December 30, 2013, 10:00:16 am »
I am the author of this binary, and I promise I did not put any malware inside. But please do not trust me, remove any valuable assets from the mining machine and monitor its network traffic and file activity.
363
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 29, 2013, 04:10:26 pm »Anyone here have any luck getting either an SSEx or AVX optimized miner running for MMC?Anyone compiled mmcminer in Archlinux? could tell me what packages are required?
(64bit only) here's my PKGBUILD https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:aguswinata/cpuminer-mmcminer/PKGBUILD?expand=1
feels free to modify.
binary available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/aguswinata/Arch_Extra/
Miner is using OpenSSL for AES, so you rather need optimized OpenSSL in your system for that.
364
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:42:36 pm »Care to send 1 satoshi from it somewhere and post the tx id?Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?QuoteBecause one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain thoughThen it would have the working fork.
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising?
yes, if I look at the transaction log, the type is "immature", not "orphan"... trust me, it is valid.
365
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 06:39:38 pm »Valid block 3026 as in you can spend it and the network will confirm?QuoteBecause one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
XRamPool is on the working fork.
If this pool really wanted to, it could fork the blockchain though
3026 was just mined by XRamPool, its a valid block. MMCPool says that it mined it as well.
Could this be considered false advertising?
366
MemoryCoin / Re: What digitalocean plan to buy for mine mmc2.0
« on: December 27, 2013, 05:58:32 pm »Probably L5639 is not the best option to mine MMC because it has 6 cores and you would make use of only 4 of them to mine MMC (it has to be power of 2)This is not exactly true. MMC client will start more threads than you have cores if the number is not power of 2, so all of them will still be utilized, although with a little bit of context switching. mmcminer will soon probably be patched with this logic too (I have a patch for that that I hope will make it to repository soon).
367
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 27, 2013, 05:41:04 pm »http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
http://mmcpool.com/
Is not the first time. Why?
Because one of them is on the wrong fork, apparently, or displays its orphans as mined blocks. You can know which one it is when you do not receive payment.
368
MemoryCoin / Re: minerd based cpu miner
« on: December 27, 2013, 05:38:45 pm »to compile miner you need ssl library
in makefile.am changeCode: [Select]minerd_LDADD = @LIBCURL@ @JANSSON_LIBS@ @PTHREAD_LIBS@toCode: [Select]minerd_LDADD = @LIBCURL@ @JANSSON_LIBS@ @PTHREAD_LIBS@ -lssl -lcrypto
hey, i wonder, does it help anything to increase memory usage?
If you mean - adding RAM to the system or closing other applications, then yes, it will decrease paging out of data miner needs to access. Turning off swap in Linux or setting a very low swappiness would help achieve that too.
369
MemoryCoin / Re: One pool with almost 100% hashpower
« on: December 26, 2013, 09:59:16 pm »But almost all blocks are already being found by the pool, so it does not even need to employ those dirty 'selfish pool' techniques. And for just 3.5% fee you honestly cannot call it abusing the monopoly.Not this early. You do not want to 51% the coin you have income in, that would kill it right away.The fact that they are already doing this, but on a pool that can damage the networkCurrently there is one pool with almost 100% hashpower. It makes MemoryCoin very unsecure at the moment.The creator has sold the source code to "a few" people.
We definitely should do something with it.
Personally I feel it should be opensourced.
Still got a few days until they create pools :S has the damage already been done?
I am asking how much it will cost to buy, but I imagine it is a ridiculous sum. I would have a pool up by this evening however.
Opesourced to community of greedy, selfish miners who don't mind to mine with every bit of cpu power they can get for free or steal? Hmm, what could possibly be wrong with this?
On the contrary -- this is the perfect time to cement your own business and damage everyone else. You don't have to destroy the currency as such, you *are* supporting it, but are the only party who can mine as much as desired -- and you can let others mine, or not mine as you please.
Until, say difficulty rises and you lose interest.
It is *really* bad idea to release new crypto currencies without already designed mechanism to start pools -- with open source software. People will mine anyway -- making sure that only few will have the privilege to benefit from this is bad. Wasting lots of resources by building closed source "sort of works" pools is expensive for everyone.
370
MemoryCoin / Re: One pool with almost 100% hashpower
« on: December 26, 2013, 06:31:36 pm »Somehow it feels like NSA is not behind this oneIn some scenarios this might actually be the motive. Imagine traditional government systems trying to cripple new cryptocurrencies by 51%-ing them.Not this early. You do not want to 51% the coin you have income in, that would kill it right away.The fact that they are already doing this, but on a pool that can damage the networkCurrently there is one pool with almost 100% hashpower. It makes MemoryCoin very unsecure at the moment.The creator has sold the source code to "a few" people.
We definitely should do something with it.
Personally I feel it should be opensourced.
Still got a few days until they create pools :S has the damage already been done?
I am asking how much it will cost to buy, but I imagine it is a ridiculous sum. I would have a pool up by this evening however.
Opesourced to community of greedy, selfish miners who don't mind to mine with every bit of cpu power they can get for free or steal? Hmm, what could possibly be wrong with this?
371
MemoryCoin / Re: One pool with almost 100% hashpower
« on: December 26, 2013, 04:32:22 pm »Not this early. You do not want to 51% the coin you have income in, that would kill it right away.The fact that they are already doing this, but on a pool that can damage the networkCurrently there is one pool with almost 100% hashpower. It makes MemoryCoin very unsecure at the moment.The creator has sold the source code to "a few" people.
We definitely should do something with it.
Personally I feel it should be opensourced.
Still got a few days until they create pools :S has the damage already been done?
I am asking how much it will cost to buy, but I imagine it is a ridiculous sum. I would have a pool up by this evening however.
Opesourced to community of greedy, selfish miners who don't mind to mine with every bit of cpu power they can get for free or steal? Hmm, what could possibly be wrong with this?
372
MemoryCoin / Re: One pool with almost 100% hashpower
« on: December 26, 2013, 04:25:58 pm »Currently there is one pool with almost 100% hashpower. It makes MemoryCoin very unsecure at the moment.The creator has sold the source code to "a few" people.
We definitely should do something with it.
Personally I feel it should be opensourced.
Still got a few days until they create pools :S has the damage already been done?
I am asking how much it will cost to buy, but I imagine it is a ridiculous sum. I would have a pool up by this evening however.
Opesourced to community of greedy, selfish miners who don't mind to mine with every bit of cpu power they can get for free or steal? Hmm, what could possibly be wrong with this?
373
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN] MMCPool.com - Win64 / OSX64 - I need your CPU power!
« on: December 26, 2013, 01:34:27 pm »
They are stales. Blocks are being found too fast.
374
MemoryCoin / Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 pm »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
375
MemoryCoin / Re: MemoryCoin on MAC
« on: December 24, 2013, 05:56:01 pm »For the daemon, you can just follow this: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-osx.mdiam using 10.8.5 any workaround!?You really can compile from your mac . Don't need Wine for this problem.Not on Mavericks, it is still not sorted out even in bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3228
For Qt client, in theory you only need Qt installed in addition to what you have installed for building the daemon. Then you just run 'qmake' command in top-level directory (one above 'src'). But here be dragons, this may not work (and often does), due to bitcoin codebase not liking your specific Qt version, missing dependencies they forgot to document, MacPorts guys breaking their ports and whatnot.
