136
General Discussion / Re: COMPUMATRIX COMPUCEEDS investigation
« on: March 01, 2016, 10:41:59 pm »If they want our promotion then they will come to forums and ask. This witch-hunt mentality is not helping.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If they want our promotion then they will come to forums and ask. This witch-hunt mentality is not helping.
137
General Discussion / Re: Testing Stealth UI
« on: March 01, 2016, 05:29:45 pm »The more you deal with Bitshares, the more you realize what genius Steve Jobs was.
138
Meta / Re: Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: March 01, 2016, 04:46:45 pm »If they are not updating in the forum then they don't need a forum section. Just slap their logo on the bitshares.org homepage and be done. Also who decides when someone becomes a partner? What is the criteria?
139
Freebie / Re: Open Beta: Testing the Tip/Sharebot Today @ Noon!
« on: February 29, 2016, 09:21:40 am »
I sent 500bts in block 3,913,407 two days ago it has not arrived yet either.
140
General Discussion / Re: Interesting feedback on BitShares from an outsider ...
« on: February 28, 2016, 10:47:27 pm »
It also should be obvious to us. The bitshares login page should have instructions on the what needs to be done and why. It should be an assumption the when someone comes to the bitshares site that they have not visited any other site about bitshares. If someone has to leave the bitshares page to figure out how to do something, that is an instant FAIL!
141
Meta / Re: Remove Partners Sections from Home
« on: February 28, 2016, 10:10:39 pm »If someone is just using the platform for their own business then they are not a partner, they are a client. If they are giving resources in form of code development and/or money that goes to platform as a whole and not just their project in particular then they can get consideration for "Partner" status. Anything less than that is just a user/client of the platform.
142
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Cannot trade my MUSE
« on: February 28, 2016, 09:05:45 pm »
Openmuse is the old name. Open.muse is the new. You convert it by going to openmuse:open.muse pair and convert it 1:1
143
General Discussion / Re: Trustless, Decentralized Bond Market Draft
« on: February 28, 2016, 07:34:01 pm »
I think there should be two styles of bonds. One treasury style dedicated to smartcoins and a general bond for users to lend to each other. Not sure if they can have the exact same mechanics because the risk profiles are different in my opinion
144
General Discussion / Re: EASY FIX to improve user experience on DEX
« on: February 27, 2016, 02:53:50 am »The groupings are great, makes it a lot easier to track what going on with the pairs.
145
General Discussion / Re: EASY FIX to improve user experience on DEX
« on: February 27, 2016, 01:15:49 am »How about an address book on the transfer page.
146
Technical Support / Re: Buy and sell boxes have moved to the very bottom of trading screen
« on: February 26, 2016, 05:15:23 am »If you switch the order book to the vertical layout its flows better. Try it.
147
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposals] Documentation and Technical Support + Python Dev and Apps
« on: February 25, 2016, 07:17:05 pm »
That"s the problem, someone like XEROC with his skills and overall knowledge of the platform should be able to be a full-time worker. There should be at least a core group of developers supported by the platform who can put in time needed and not worry about losing their pay for things unrelated to their overall performance.
148
General Discussion / Re: Would you support 2% dilution to BitAsset Yield for a 6 month limited trial?
« on: February 24, 2016, 10:34:02 pm »
Everybody is looking for a sure-thing. But there is no such thing as a sure-thing especially in crypto. The reason why we fail is because we are too scared too fail. That's why we need to try something see if fails then move on to the next thing to try if it does. Instead we try, fail, then sit on our hands pointing fingers instead on focusing on trying the next experiment.
That's the problem with being young, you think you have all the time in world.
That's the problem with being young, you think you have all the time in world.
149
General Discussion / Re: NXT forks BitShares 2.O mojo! goes for scalability
« on: February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pm »While we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.
150
General Discussion / Re: Would you support 2% dilution to BitAsset Yield for a 6 month limited trial?
« on: February 24, 2016, 06:15:58 pm »QuoteYou can't test that on a test net or with a test asset.
Not sure about test net, but you definitely can test it on test asset. If it outcompetes bitUSD, go ahead and apply same rules to all other assets.
Edit: In fact, you can do this experiment without asking nobody. Create you private asset, peg it to usd, pay holders yield out of your pocket, and see if it works as you expect.
Imagine a bank wanting to offer its shareholders an incentive to open accounts with them. Would they create test accounts to see if shareholders will open them? No, they will set a budget and a time frame, offer the incentive, and see if the shareholders will open real accounts. If it works, they may continue it and even ratchet it up. If not, they will discontinue it and perhaps try something else.
The kind of testing you're talking about would be fine to test any modifications to the mechanics of the backend system and the GUI before putting it into production. But you don't test behavior like that.
You are not a bank, and you don't manage accounts. If you want to play with different derivatives, create your own and play with it.
We need a sign on the the top of the forum that states that. People think we are talking total supply and we are not.
