Yes! I found the Chronos video, "Bitshares Inflation Rate VERY informative.
Peerplays has been good for BitShares. It's only tradable on our exchange rn and all BTS holders (back in October) will get some Peerplays as a nod to BitShares tech playing a central role. Pretty cool. So I get some 100 Peerplays. Can't say no to that.
Steem did us no such favors and some are bitter *cough* liljay *cough*. Lol. Devs and even Dan are under no obligation. BitShares can stand on it's own.
I know I'm just a newbie here but, looking at this with fresh eyes, that's the problem right there! bitShares allows tokens which become coins in their own right, to be created for a one-time flat fee. What? Like $30. Then using the bitShares technology, they go on their merry way and reap all the profits.
Tokens and assets based on bitShares need to pay rent, (fees). Every month, some of these new assets need to be returned to bitShares, where they can be sold and placed into the Reserve Pool. The more valuable the assets become, the more money flows back to Reserve Pool. Its' only fair. Then there would be plenty of income, for workers, witnesses and further development....
AND... suddenly bitShares would regain all it's lost respect.PS: Of course, in such a scenario, the amount of such a monthly fee could not be based on the Available Tokens but rather would need to be based on the average Market Cap for the past month. (Ie: moving average.) Also... my apologies if I've been too presumptuous in posting such a suggestion, as I admit, my understanding of the existing architecture is very limited and this may not even be possible.