Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I have two tesla m2090 and both of them do about 600 or 650 CPM. So the hardware isn't bad or anything.Thank you. It could be my miner's fault. I am considering to buy a 3GB version of GTX 580 to see why cudaMemcpy failed.
Is there anything I can do to help diagnose the issue?
My tesla m2090 is only getting about 600 CPM on both 0.3c and 0.3b. Do you think that the code could be more optimized to use a tesla or is this what I can expect from this card?In my opinion, the performance that can be archived for GTX 580 or Tesla m2090 should be at least ~1100cpm, but it isn't. I don't know why...
PtsGPUz0.3c - ESET NoD 7.0 found Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.GYes, software protection tool used in this version. It is safe.
680 gtx vram +500 (effective 7GHz the same like stock 770) GPU clock at 1202 MHz. Started mined minute ago and now have around 1350. AMAZING JOB MAN! Fee still 6%?Yes, still 6%.
Is it possible to solo-mine with this miner? Can I, for example, point the miner to my own wallet?No support for solo-mining directly now. I am sorry that this work is on low priority.
How this is possible that 480 have around 1030, when my 680 have 995-1000 and only 612MB (from MSI afterburner) VRAM works.The memory bus width of GTX 680 is 256 bit, while GTX 480 is 384 bit. So GTX 480 may get slight higher performance.
modified version 0.3 with less donates (20% -> 5%) and only one donation pool - http://www.multiupload.nl/QQQ4NFRNPLI have download this modified version and test it preliminarily, find it is ok. But still, use it at your own risks.
modified binary: PtsGPUz0.3_lessdonate.exe is protected against analyze
Now 20% is clearly stated."A small portion...", a small portion isn't 20% though is it? You should clearly state there is a 20% tax on earnings if you use this miner.I do not mind donating 20% of the mining to you, as long as you state clearly in the program that such donation exists. Not like the other existing miners which state donations when the program is launched, your software does not show such message, making us believe your software is free of tax. I think this is not right or honest. I find your software is easy to use, and I suggest you add the information in the program (not only in the readme file) to clarify donations.This will be added in next version of this miner. Now the 3th line of my post is capitalized and in red.
Any idea why i can not run it on Amazon? It gives an error. Does it support Tesla?What error?
I do not mind donating 20% of the mining to you, as long as you state clearly in the program that such donation exists. Not like the other existing miners which state donations when the program is launched, your software does not show such message, making us believe your software is free of tax. I think this is not right or honest. I find your software is easy to use, and I suggest you add the information in the program (not only in the readme file) to clarify donations.This will be added in next version of this miner. Now the 3th line of my post is capitalized and in red.
You are right, great job to find this. I don't know how to do so.Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.
Again, I don't think anyone is opposed to developer fees, but we would like you to be more open as to how much is being mined. Can you please elaborate?
16/20 (80%) - mining 4 u
4/20 (20%) - for developerCode: [Select]r = rand() + 65539 * r;
v = r % 20;
if ( v == 0 || v == 3 || v > 17 )
{
// mining 4 developer
}
Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
SP = 1664Yes, I think the performance will be around 1000 CPM.
Memory bus = 384 bit
Memory Frequency = 3700 mhz
Shaders = 512
Clock = 1301 mhz
Disregard price, how well would it perform in PTS mining? ~1000 CPM?
Interesting, o well.Tesla is expensive, as there is no need for double precision calculation in PTS GPU miner, it will get just same performance with game level card with same numbers of SP, memory bus width and frequency.
Any idea how a Tesla M2090 or Tesla m2070Q would perform?
