Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
i can`t download this file "PtsGPUz0.5b", anybody who can send it to my Email: seven.ss@qq.com, THK.Try this link:
Yes.whats the real fee of the v0.3c ,%6? and i am getting 2750cpm with 2xgtx680you think can i get 3k cpm from 2 xgtx 680?No. I think the performance should be around 2140 cpm with 2x GTX 680.
i just used my 780 GPU o mine, collisions/min: 1617.1552, and the temperature raise to around 80°，is that normal?The performance is normal. zvs and lilunxm12 reported the performance of GTX 780 is around 2000 cpm when overclocked.
you think can i get 3k cpm from 2 xgtx 680?No. I think the performance should be around 2140 cpm with 2x GTX 680.
I just noticed that when running the 0.5 it puts a serious load on the cpu. Using a 1100T, I get all 6 cores at 93%-100% load.Strange behavior, I don't know what happened currently on your system.
Is there a setting to shift all the work to the gpu's?
EDIT: When running the 3b there is virtually no load on the cpu. I have one core that gets to maybe 25%.
i want to use this miner with 3x r290 and 2 x Gtx 680.Do you think they will work together @ windows 7?And what will be their cpm.I am getting 4k+ from 290s at linux with clpts v.0.2.2Clpts v.0.2.2 may runs much faster than my miner when using AMD R9 290. Please use "-da 10" option with my miner to avoid using of AMD cards, and run clpts v.0.2.2 on AMD R9 290 together with my miner on Nvidia cards to get best performance.
Something new.Thanks for the information you provided. You are right, it is because low PCI-E bandwidth when using PCI-E 1x risers.
I have 4 750ti's on usb powered risers:http://www.hashratesolutions.com/products/6-pack-pci-e-powered-riser-card-60cm-24-usb-3-0-cable
Before I used these I had 2 in the pci-e slots and was getting about 1,000 cpm now I only get 1,900 cpm or 487 cpm per card. It looks like my cards are running at 1x in the pci-e slots. Could that be the reason for the lower cpm?
When I ran another PTS miner I only lost about 40 cpm per card but it originally only got bee 580-600 cpm per card. I would much rather use this one.
Is there an install guide for nvidia cards at linux and is this faster than clpts miner for amd cards?whats the dev fee on this miner?1. This miner do not support Linux currently.
I don't have a 780ti but I do have a 780. The miner reports around 2000cpm @1293/1502Thanks for the performance information you provided. I guess that the performance of GTX 780Ti will be 10% higher.
Thank you very much abc123! This GPU Miner v0.5 is the best in all your miners!It is my mistake that GTX780 runs very slow in v0.4, I am sorry.Before I use this miner v5.0, I used the v3.0b. Because my GTX780 Lightning 1254/1502 can run around 1800 cpm in v3.0b, but has problem in the other miners. It runs very slow in v4.0 to v4.0c. I have no idea about that!
The other thing is my GTX770DC2OC 1254/1752 and GTX660DC2OC 1097/1502 can run around 2000 cpm in v4.0c, but just 1700 cpm in v3.0b
I was waiting for a long time that you can improve the miner.
I can run my GTX780*2+GTX770DC2OC+GTX660DC2OC around 5700 cpm in v5.0!
11 av detect this miner is a virus, can you reduce please ?This miner is protected from being analyzed by exe file shell tools, so may
Hello, how to mining only on one gpu.Thanks for your advice. Please use PtsGPUz v0.3c, which don't support AMD cards.
I want mining on gpu 0 (nvidia) without mining on gpu 1 (amd).
What do you mean they are different? you mean the way clpts 0.2.x calculates cpm is different to other miners? Please specify, thanks.I means that he may find a very effective algorighm for cards like 280x.
The Tahiti improved in clpts 0.2 is significant, which used to net1200+ (similar to 680/670) in its v0.1 or any other miners now. I believe only clpts 0.2 makse a big step. If as you said, pts is designed by sha512, ,which should make no different, then I believe cuda has no reason behind AMD.I guess that the collision algorithm (not SHA512) in clpts 0.2.x is different from any other miners.
hi @abc123，could you make your application writes running log to stdout, so i can use my watchdog script capture mining stats and restart mining process when cpm fall to 0.000 CPM accidently.
now i cannot pipe out anything from stdout or stderr when ptsgpuz running. Even start miner and pipe to text file with "> log.txt " is not working. Thank you!
and the first reply of this post may help:http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/25c9a991-89df-4c70-b7d2-dd40eb35e235/redirecting-stdinstdoutstderr-for-windows-console?forum=vclanguage.Thanks. Without fflush(), it needs very long time to get something in the redirected "log.txt" file.
it's said if use printf and not calling fflush() on windows platform will make Pipe not working as expecting. i checked jhprotominer source code and find out it maybe the problem.
Is there a way to run this on only device y, z, instead of device x, y, z? I have a machine with r270, 5830, 5830... clpts would be faster with the r270, but it crashes when I run ptsgpu (which starts mining on the 3 amd gpus)... clpts gets 0 c/m for all my 1GB cards, not sure how you even run them... (none of the 5830, 5850, 7770, 7790, or 7850 with 1GB works)Not supported for AMD cards currently. The "-t", "-d" options only works for Nvidia cards now. Thanks for your advice.
My friend's R9 280X can have 3100/3500 (default/OC) cpm on clpts-v0.2.2, and my gtx690 has 2200 cpm in total. I believe this means AMD now is much faster in SHA 512, single chip beats my two. clpts also asks for 2 threads for each chip like your miner, apparently, it is much more efficient and optimized.Thanks for the information you provided. I don't have a R9 280x just now, on my HD7850 2GB, clpts-v0.2.2 is ~15% faster displayed, ~10% faster net than PtsGPUz v0.4c, which net performance is 840 cpm.
Check this post https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2598.0
