BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: monsterer on December 15, 2014, 08:37:26 pm
-
Hi all,
Shentist and I thought it would be good to set up a development diary for the progress we are making on Metaexchange, which is being funded by our 100% pay delegate, dev-metaexchange.monsterer.
https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange
The first task on this project is to produce a daemon to enable anyone to set up a bitcoin on-ramp into bitshares.
The idea is for the daemon to convert bitcoin deposits into bitAssets directly, so users can send bitcoin to a special address which is monitored by the daemon and have the daemon issue the corresponding quantity of bitAssets and send them directly to the depositor, thereby enabling an easy route into (and out of, using the reverse technique) bitshares.
Progress so far has been good, I have the first part of the code for scanning the bitshares blockchain in place, for picking out the public key of the depositor, and converting that into a bitcoin address. I also have unit tests for going to and from bitcoin and bitshares public keys and addresses.
The next step is to work on the bitcoin blockchain scanning portion of the code, which will be easier than the bitshares side, since all the RPC data structures already exist and so I expect that to go smoothly.
If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them!
Cheers, Paul.
-
we should consider to move your first post from GD to BTS Delegates ... then you can update on this post ... instead of creating a 2nd here ...what do you think!?
-
hi cass,
we are locking the old thread up, so we will use the new one.
-
any new?
-
Updating coming today :)
-
Hello again!
Just completed the first test of the gateway, going from BTS->bitcoin and bitcoin->BTS!
I've designed the system to be very flexable, so it can support these use cases:
*) IOU->bitcoin / bitcoin->IOU
*) bitBTC->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitBTC
*) bitUSD->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitUSD (as long as there is an exchange rate available and a spread)
This means that not only will this gateway support going from bitcoin to bitBTC, but also going from bitcoin straight to bitUSD or vise verse.
Of course this requires the operator to hold both bitcoin and the relevant bitAsset, but in some ways this is preferable than having the operator issue IOUs, because IOUs inherently have no value, so in the case of catastrophic failure and loss of funds an operator issuing IOUs would lose customer's bitcoins, but in the case where the operator holds and issues bitAssets, such a failure would only result in the operator losing his profits / funds, but importantly not the customers funds, since bitAssets do have an intrinsic value outside this system.
This gateway will also support alternative methods in going from bitcoin to bitAssets. Currently, the design requires you to import your private keys from your bitcoin wallet into your bitshares wallet so that transactions sent from bitcoin can be read by bitshares. This is quite a high friction operation so I am adding some very simple features to allow operators to easily work around the problem.
Stay tuned for more!
https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange
Cheers, Paul.
-
Hello again!
Just completed the first test of the gateway, going from BTS->bitcoin and bitcoin->BTS!
I've designed the system to be very flexable, so it can support these use cases:
*) IOU->bitcoin / bitcoin->IOU
*) bitBTC->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitBTC
*) bitUSD->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitUSD (as long as there is an exchange rate available and a spread)
This means that not only will this gateway support going from bitcoin to bitBTC, but also going from bitcoin straight to bitUSD or vise verse.
Of course this requires the operator to hold both bitcoin and the relevant bitAsset, but in some ways this is preferable than having the operator issue IOUs, because IOUs inherently have no value, so in the case of catastrophic failure and loss of funds an operator issuing IOUs would lose customer's bitcoins, but in the case where the operator holds and issues bitAssets, such a failure would only result in the operator losing his profits / funds, but importantly not the customers funds, since bitAssets do have an intrinsic value outside this system.
This gateway will also support alternative methods in going from bitcoin to bitAssets. Currently, the design requires you to import your private keys from your bitcoin wallet into your bitshares wallet so that transactions sent from bitcoin can be read by bitshares. This is quite a high friction operation so I am adding some very simple features to allow operators to easily work around the problem.
Stay tuned for more!
https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange
Cheers, Paul.
can't wait to see it in action. Happy chrismas everyone.
-
Last commit 6 days ago. :-\
-
Last commit 6 days ago. :-\
Sounds about right. Last week was a Holiday week for much of the world.
-
So by not useing IOU's the risk falls on the gateway operator and not the customer?
Are you sure this is wise? A gateway operator will surely have a greater sum of money at stake then a single customer. Also this will require a greater amount of start up capital for a gateway operator because they have to keep some of everything on the shelf.
-
So by not useing IOU's the risk falls on the gateway operator and not the customer?
Are you sure this is wise? A gateway operator will surely have a greater sum of money at stake then a single customer. Also this will require a greater amount of start up capital for a gateway operator because they have to keep some of everything on the shelf.
*) IOU->bitcoin / bitcoin->IOU
*) bitBTC->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitBTC
*) bitUSD->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitUSD (as long as there is an exchange rate available and a spread)
Everything will be tried!
-
wildbunny authored 11 days ago
11 days past,no new updates.
This is a 100% paid delegate,This is how we waste our money and support.
-
How about a update?
-
he updated before christmas and is on vacation.
what do you guys expect? to work on holiday day as well?
-
Hello again!
Just completed the first test of the gateway, going from BTS->bitcoin and bitcoin->BTS!
I've designed the system to be very flexable, so it can support these use cases:
*) IOU->bitcoin / bitcoin->IOU
*) bitBTC->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitBTC
*) bitUSD->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitUSD (as long as there is an exchange rate available and a spread)
This means that not only will this gateway support going from bitcoin to bitBTC, but also going from bitcoin straight to bitUSD or vise verse.
Of course this requires the operator to hold both bitcoin and the relevant bitAsset, but in some ways this is preferable than having the operator issue IOUs, because IOUs inherently have no value, so in the case of catastrophic failure and loss of funds an operator issuing IOUs would lose customer's bitcoins, but in the case where the operator holds and issues bitAssets, such a failure would only result in the operator losing his profits / funds, but importantly not the customers funds, since bitAssets do have an intrinsic value outside this system.
This gateway will also support alternative methods in going from bitcoin to bitAssets. Currently, the design requires you to import your private keys from your bitcoin wallet into your bitshares wallet so that transactions sent from bitcoin can be read by bitshares. This is quite a high friction operation so I am adding some very simple features to allow operators to easily work around the problem.
Stay tuned for more!
https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange
Cheers, Paul.
To a non-techie like me, does this mean we can have a wallet which allows me to go BTC<->BitBTC with a single click (with a small fee if necessary)?
-
Hello again!
Just completed the first test of the gateway, going from BTS->bitcoin and bitcoin->BTS!
I've designed the system to be very flexable, so it can support these use cases:
*) IOU->bitcoin / bitcoin->IOU
*) bitBTC->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitBTC
*) bitUSD->bitcoin / bitcoin->bitUSD (as long as there is an exchange rate available and a spread)
This means that not only will this gateway support going from bitcoin to bitBTC, but also going from bitcoin straight to bitUSD or vise verse.
Of course this requires the operator to hold both bitcoin and the relevant bitAsset, but in some ways this is preferable than having the operator issue IOUs, because IOUs inherently have no value, so in the case of catastrophic failure and loss of funds an operator issuing IOUs would lose customer's bitcoins, but in the case where the operator holds and issues bitAssets, such a failure would only result in the operator losing his profits / funds, but importantly not the customers funds, since bitAssets do have an intrinsic value outside this system.
This gateway will also support alternative methods in going from bitcoin to bitAssets. Currently, the design requires you to import your private keys from your bitcoin wallet into your bitshares wallet so that transactions sent from bitcoin can be read by bitshares. This is quite a high friction operation so I am adding some very simple features to allow operators to easily work around the problem.
Stay tuned for more!
https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange
Cheers, Paul.
To a non-techie like me, does this mean we can have a wallet which allows me to go BTC<->BitBTC with a single click (with a small fee if necessary)?
he is coding a open source gateway application, for anyone free to use.
-
he updated before christmas and is on vacation.
what do you guys expect? to work on holiday day as well?
I am not sure how long a holiday is where you are from but as the user in above of me noticed its been 11 days since a commit.
I don't see a issue with weekly update's. They take 5 mins...
-
Vote him out!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
-
he updated before christmas and is on vacation.
what do you guys expect? to work on holiday day as well?
As his partner, you probably know when he is expected back from his holiday?
-
last (real) update in bitshares/master repo was 23. of december .. so better also vote out the core devs?!
Vote him out!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
-
last (real) update in bitshares/master repo was 23. of december .. so better also vote out the core devs?!Vote him out!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/commits/develop Develop branch was updated a day ago. He is a paid employee of the blockchain. We should at least know when he would be back from vacation.
-
I see your point .. but looking at his pay of roughly $2k a month I think we should reconsider a "vote-him-out" policy ..
currently we can need EVERY-SINGLE-DEVELOPER ... and i personally do not agree with voting him out right away
-
Hi all, sorry for the delay in replying I've just got back from Christmas/new year holidays and today is my birthday (currently away from computer) so I will be back to work tomorrow!
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers, paul
-
Hi all, sorry for the delay in replying I've just got back from Christmas/new year holidays and today is my birthday (currently away from computer) so I will be back to work tomorrow!
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers, paul
No need to rush.Happy birthday!
-
Hi all, sorry for the delay in replying I've just got back from Christmas/new year holidays and today is my birthday (currently away from computer) so I will be back to work tomorrow!
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers, paul
Happy Birthday !
-
Ok, made some good progress this week:
Set up another machine in order to test this process more correctly.
Tested sending BTC to the daemon address and correctly got BTS back out again.
Still working on the opposite way around, having some slight issues when the sender is not a registers bitshares account.
All in all, this is close to being the first releasable version! Once this outstanding bug is fixed and I can get some more testing done it will be ready to go!
Have a great weekend!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Ok, made some good progress this week:
Set up another machine in order to test this process more correctly.
Tested sending BTC to the daemon address and correctly got BTS back out again.
Still working on the opposite way around, having some slight issues when the sender is not a registers bitshares account.
All in all, this is close to being the first releasable version! Once this outstanding bug is fixed and I can get some more testing done it will be ready to go!
Have a great weekend!
Cheers, Paul.
Good job, looking forward to seeing it in action! :)
-
Great! Really looking forward to this!
-
Why are you writing this in C# instead of something cross platform like Python?
-
Why are you writing this in C# instead of something cross platform like Python?
From 2015 C# becomes also cross platform :)
http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-to-open-source-more-of-net-and-bring-it-to-linux-mac-os-x/
-
Why are you writing this in C# instead of something cross platform like Python?
Excellent question! Some definitions are in order, though.
Cross platform: runs on multiple different OS and hardware. Python/Java/C# do not run natively on any platform without the runtimes being installed (except maybe some linux distros with python pre-installed, or windows for c#).
According to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems windows has the most install base at over 50%, so c# is the ideal choice because the majority of users will not need to install the runtime in order to run the daemon.
In addition c# provides a type safe programming language which aids in the development of something of this scope. Further, i can actually provide compiled binaries for this project so that end users do not need to spend days trying to get the project built and running correctly, they can simply run the .exe I provide.
Also, for linux server deployments I've been using Mono for years sucessfully and with the new .NET core that microsoft are releasing it will only get easier to use c# in different environments.
Hope that helps to understand my choice!
Cheers, Paul.
-
What kind of performance penalty is incurred using mono? Isn't it yet another layer of API translation code to map C# calls to the (Windows) OS into equivalent OSX / Linux calls? Or has mono evolved to use visualization technology to run windows exe binaries and dll shared code?
But thanks for the explanation, sounds like a valid point. I've never liked .NET. IMO it just doesn't feel as efficient as the closest equivalent which is Java. Java always seemed more responsive; I suspect it has a more efficient garbage collector and dispatch algo. .NET apps seem to que things up at times and there are lags in the UX.
If M$ actually does release the C# runtime into open source and not hold back critical portions or try to maintain control over it, your decision may well come to be seen as wise. Otherwise it could backfire.
-
I use .net in a commercial client server app for a realtime embedded controller running windows ce.. No probs
For us emulation debugging unit testing and continous integration are key and nothing tops visual studio for that
-
What kind of performance penalty is incurred using mono? Isn't it yet another layer of API translation code to map C# calls to the (Windows) OS into equivalent OSX / Linux calls? Or has mono evolved to use visualization technology to run windows exe binaries and dll shared code?
Mono is a complete re-engineering of the .NET run-time, so theoretically it is as efficient on linux/mac as .NET on windows is. Mono runs c# executables directly, they don't need re-compiling.
If M$ actually does release the C# runtime into open source and not hold back critical portions or try to maintain control over it, your decision may well come to be seen as wise. Otherwise it could backfire.
I don't see how it can backfire, the majority of computer users run windows anyway. I don't know if you've tried to compile something like bitcoin/bitshares on linux from cold before, I have and it took me days to get each working correctly with the correct dependencies installed. .NET just makes all that go away.
-
It doesnt go away just that visual studios makes it easier.. you can still get into dll hell or break builds if your references arent setup properly... It usually assumes precompiled linked libs are dependencies in references whereas in the opensource world noone trusts compoled binaries so you build and inspect from scratch..
In a build environment makes way more sense to trust binaries that are signed
-
Ok, made some good progress this week:
Set up another machine in order to test this process more correctly.
Tested sending BTC to the daemon address and correctly got BTS back out again.
Still working on the opposite way around, having some slight issues when the sender is not a registers bitshares account.
All in all, this is close to being the first releasable version! Once this outstanding bug is fixed and I can get some more testing done it will be ready to go!
Have a great weekend!
Cheers, Paul.
Great to have you back, your project is so exciting that I look forward to seeing your progress updates.........also please ignore the shill above me suggesting to vote you out, I meant absolutely nothing of the sort.
Happy Birthday
-
Mono is a complete re-engineering of the .NET run-time, so theoretically it is as efficient on linux/mac as .NET on windows is. Mono runs c# executables directly, they don't need re-compiling.
I don't see how it can backfire, the majority of computer users run windows anyway. I don't know if you've tried to compile something like bitcoin/bitshares on linux from cold before, I have and it took me days to get each working correctly with the correct dependencies installed. .NET just makes all that go away.
The way it might backfire is M$ releases all but a few crucial portions of the .NET runtime into open source as a ploy to gain more widespread adoption. The licensing for that small but crucial part isn't so restrictive to prohibit adoption by all but the most ardent of open source fanatics. Then they change the licensing conditions and it becomes a big legal mess. Realistic? Perhaps not, but M$ has been known for decades as the king of proprietary, non-standards compliant, NIH business practices, and I am leery of them. Whether such a backfire scenario is likely I don't know, it really depends on how generous M$ is about turning .NET into an open source platform.
Javascript is one of my most favored of scripting languages. If I'm not mistaken it was originally created by Netscape, which in order to compete in the early browser wars M$ had to implement. However M$ initially opposed it becoming a standard, but adoption was so widespread that ECMAscript, which was essentially Javascript, became the standard which M$ was forced kicking and screaming to implement. I'm not sure about these days as much but in the past M$ has resisted supporting standards for web browser technologies and has been a thorn in the side of web devs since day 1.
I have attempted to compile the BitShares client on linux Mint 17 without success, but I only devoted 1 late evening back in October to the effort so I am certain when I attempt it again I will be able to identify and resolve the issue fairly quickly.
You are right however regarding the issues one must face when compiling from source. I've had very similar issues on Windows as well, tho I have no dev experience with .NET at all. It turned me off so much in it's early days and Java was much more mature, worked better and was cross platform so why bother with proprietary .NET?
That was then. It would be interesting to see an in depth comparison of today's Java & .NET platforms to see which is better or what the relative merits of each are.
-
Ok, we're very close to release v1 now - everything is working except for deposits from unregistered accounts.
I expect to have v1 out by the end of the weekend :) Stay tuned!
-
Good job! +5%
Can't wait to try it out
-
I think Microsoft has seen the light on being more cross-platform. The new CEO understands that in order for Microsoft to stay relevant they have meet users and developers where they are at and not try to force them to the windows platform. The Internet is the platform now.
-
Hi guys,
v1 is ready to go - I just finished writing the instructions for how to use the metaexchange BTC/bitBTC gateway but I've realised that since its GMT 22:18 and I'm about to go to bed, now is not the ideal time to launch this for testing as I wont be able to field inevitable support requests!
So, if you can wait until tomorrow morning, I will set the gateway up for business first thing so that I can be on hand to solve problems.
The code is fully checked in to github if you want to take a look.
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Hi guys,
v1 is ready to go - I just finished writing the instructions for how to use the metaexchange BTC/bitBTC gateway but I've realised that since its GMT 22:18 and I'm about to go to bed, now is not the ideal time to launch this for testing as I wont be able to field inevitable support requests!
So, if you can wait until tomorrow morning, I will set the gateway up for business first thing so that I can be on hand to solve problems.
The code is fully checked in to github if you want to take a look.
Thanks for your patience!
Cheers, Paul.
Awesome!!
-
+5% .. looking forward
-
+5% It's time to buy some BTC for testing :D
-
+5% hell yeah!
-
+5%
-
Ok, the metaexchange BTC->bitBTC gateway is live!
Here is how to use this
* Import your bitcoin private keys into the bitshares wallet account that you want to use. The private keys must be compressed* (i.e. not starting with a 5, they look like this L4rK1yDtCWekvXuE6oXD9jCYfFNV2cWRpVuPLBcCU2z8TrisoyY1).
* use wallet_account_update_active_key to set one of your imported keys as the active key
* send bitcoins to our gateway address: 1KduukGNb5SH8L6oDwQf8sDrKk68fjvnvF
* send bitBTC to our gateway account: metaexchangebtc
Any bitcoins you send will be turned into bitBTC by the gateway (after 1 confirmation) and sent to your bitshares account. Any bitBTC that you send to the gateway will be turned into bitcoins and sent to your bitcoin wallet.
We have funded the gateway with 0.5 BTC/0.5 bitBTC for testing purposes, there is a 0.01 BTC transaction size limit at the moment. Please use small amounts to test this with - this is beta software and may contain bugs, you could lose funds.
For this test there are no transaction fees.
We are well aware that this private key importing process isn't usable for the non-techy, so the next step is to create a simple website to make this procress 100% frictionless, which is what I'll be working on next.
Cheers, Paul.
*) The reason private keys must be compressed is that the bitshares client always converts any private key (compressed or uncompressed) into a compressed public key and since there are two different bitcoin addresses associated with each private key (one from the compressed key, one from the uncompressed version) funds may not arrive in your bitcoin wallet if you import the incorrect type, since the bitshares account public key is turned into a bitcoin address by the daemon.
In case of error, you can import the other version of the private key into your bitcoin wallet to get the funds, but this requires a rescan, which takes a while.
-
+5%
-
Sweet ..
In case of error, you can import the other version of the private key into your bitcoin wallet to get the funds, but this requires a rescan, which takes a while.
You can restrict the block that you want to rescan with
rescan [first_block_number] [num_blocks] [fast_scan]
-
Awesome +5% 8)
Sent 0.01 BitBTC to BTC and returned 0.006 BTC to BitBTC
(BTC to BitBTC did not show in my Recent Transactions in the Bitshares wallet)
-
(BTC to BitBTC did not show in my Recent Transactions in the Bitshares wallet)
known issue in the transaction history of the client .. though the founds should appear in the balance .. devs are working on a rewrite of the history
-
(BTC to BitBTC did not show in my Recent Transactions in the Bitshares wallet)
known issue in the transaction history of the client .. though the founds should appear in the balance .. devs are working on a rewrite of the history
The funds did return - thanks
-
Ok, weekly update time again!
Last week was mostly vetting the live test of the gateway, which seemed to go well, although we didn't really have enough users to fully test correctly. I'm hoping that once the website goes live we will get a lot more because it'll be so, so much easier to use.
With that in mind, I've started to bring the old metaexchange prototype website framework into this project with some retargeting to serve as the website for our gateway. This has been bought into github as well. I'm hoping to have something live to test with soon!
-
Nice work you've done here. I was curious how difficult it would be to make an asset<->asset gateway. The reason is this would let lesser DPOS chains do price discovery and use the BTS DEX as a market without having to try to find a reasonable crypto-exchange.
So all your use-cases understandably have BTC on one side of the equation. I would basically like to remove that and put an asset on both sides. Do you forsee difficulty in doing this? Is there any documentation on getting your work fired up and running so I could modify a working version of it? I plan on setting up some tests with devshares <-> BTS. I'd rather just get this working before I release my chain so it can be liquid and tradeable instantly. Whether we go with version .6 or .5 or later..
-
Nice work you've done here. I was curious how difficult it would be to make an asset<->asset gateway. The reason is this would let lesser DPOS chains do price discovery and use the BTS DEX as a market without having to try to find a reasonable crypto-exchange.
This would be better served using the atomic cross-chain transactions functionality which the blockchain provides.
-
Nice work you've done here. I was curious how difficult it would be to make an asset<->asset gateway. The reason is this would let lesser DPOS chains do price discovery and use the BTS DEX as a market without having to try to find a reasonable crypto-exchange.
This would be better served using the atomic cross-chain transactions functionality which the blockchain provides.
you can find more information about how that works here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10132.0;all
but keep in mind that currently xchain trading is disabled in BTS .. not tested enough yet
-
I probably won't fork this and will just hack something up in python using mysql but the cross chain trading is far from being implemented. I have used C# in the past but python has value to me to learn.
-
I probably won't fork this and will just hack something up in python using mysql but the cross chain trading is far from being implemented. I have used C# in the past but python has value to me to learn.
http://github.com/xeroc/python-bitsharesrpc
have fun with python :D
-
Hello
Is this service still running?
I sent 0.01 BTC yesterday and it has not appeared in my wallet as BitBTC.
-
Hello
Is this service still running?
I sent 0.01 BTC yesterday and it has not appeared in my wallet as BitBTC.
Monsterer will look into it. Thanks for the information.
-
Hello
Is this service still running?
I sent 0.01 BTC yesterday and it has not appeared in my wallet as BitBTC.
I think this was it?
https://blockchain.info/tx/d1ec39f4d223451391f0ae8f819cc1d329beb3c05a1e49c0b85bd6e39f3bc5ba
According to my records, this transaction was converted into bitbtc and sent here: BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1652539
It may not appear in your transaction history because the client is broken, but your account balance should show 0.01 BTC. Let me know if not?
Cheers, Paul.
-
Update: I am testing the new website/daemon, so the old system has been disabled for now - please don't send any bitcoins to the old daemon address, or metaexchangebtc account.
-
Hello
Is this service still running?
I sent 0.01 BTC yesterday and it has not appeared in my wallet as BitBTC.
I think this was it?
https://blockchain.info/tx/d1ec39f4d223451391f0ae8f819cc1d329beb3c05a1e49c0b85bd6e39f3bc5ba
According to my records, this transaction was converted into bitbtc and sent here: BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1652539
It may not appear in your transaction history because the client is broken, but your account balance should show 0.01 BTC. Let me know if not?
Cheers, Paul.
Hello
Could you check the difference between these two transactions?
:) got my BitBTC :)
Status: 1532 confirmations
Date: 21/01/2015 23:56
To: Bitshares - metaexchangebtc 1KduukGNb5SH8L6oDwQf8sDrKk68fjvnvF
Debit: -0.006 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00069 BTC
Net amount: -0.00669 BTC
Transaction ID: bd4e5a9035d544d88ddeb4ee0fa4189d2b47fee8d88cb7da8b2e267197105d8e-000 :) got my BitBTC :)
and
:( no BitBTC :(
Status: 441 confirmations
Date: 29/01/2015 19:39
To: Bitshares - metaexchangebtc 1KduukGNb5SH8L6oDwQf8sDrKk68fjvnvF
Debit: -0.01 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00069 BTC
Net amount: -0.01069 BTC
Transaction ID: d1ec39f4d223451391f0ae8f819cc1d329beb3c05a1e49c0b85bd6e39f3bc5ba-000 :( no BitBTC :(
There goes some privacy :P
-
First one was received and bitBTC sent to BTSJEgjaCV1fsLeYUfP2mJ5jynWVwhjx3ZQT
txid=6078f80d7cdced1b1c440b70af04b74c4e604a43
Second one was received, and bitBTC sent to BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf
txid=ab6215d5be2b8d7349dad05e777d04334bd7782d
Do you own the second address?
-
First one was received and bitBTC sent to BTSJEgjaCV1fsLeYUfP2mJ5jynWVwhjx3ZQT
txid=6078f80d7cdced1b1c440b70af04b74c4e604a43
Second one was received, and bitBTC sent to BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf
txid=ab6215d5be2b8d7349dad05e777d04334bd7782d
Do you own the second address?
No
Is there a console command that will help ?
-
No
Is there a console command that will help ?
Try wallet_account_list_public_keys on the account which you imported your private keys into.
-
Hello
The print out is 2332 lines long - BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf is not listed.
-
Hello
The print out is 2332 lines long - BTSLQ6SqHaxNK9UCbx9sh6pZ8rVyUAfzqjFf is not listed.
I've manually refunded you. I'm not sure what happened, is it possible you sent this from an account which you didn't import private keys into?
The new system is up and in testing, this problem will not happen again :)
-
this did not happend due to uncompressed/compressed key fuckup .. did it?
@iHashFury, download the brainwallet.org webpage (link is on the page in the lower right corner)
disconnect from inet, open up the brainwallet.org page from localhost
click "private key" and paste your private key, press the "uncompressed" or "compressed" button, whichever is inactive,
the private key changes. take that new private key and import it into the bitcoinwallet of your choice
-
Thank you for the refund.
Here is the process I used which worked on these two occasions https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=12317.msg176958#msg176958
##Dump Keys##
#Bitcoin Wallet Console:
dumpprivkey "bitcoinaddress"
K000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000BTC
#Bitshares Wallet Console:
dump_private_key <input>
"500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000BTS"
##Import Keys##
#Import your bitcoin private keys into the bitshares Wallet(not starting with a 5)
#importprivkey <wif_key> [account_name] [create_new_account] [rescan]
importprivkey K000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000BTC [account_name] 0 0
wallet_account_update_active_key <account_to_update> <pay_from_account> K000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000BTC
#Import your bitshares private keys into the bitcoin Wallet
#importprivkey "bitcoinprivkey" ( "label" rescan )
importprivkey "K00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000BTS"
Using the same bitcoin wallet for my third transaction on 29/01/2015 19:39, I did not receive the BitBTC.
Status: 441 confirmations
Date: 29/01/2015 19:39
To: Bitshares - metaexchangebtc 1KduukGNb5SH8L6oDwQf8sDrKk68fjvnvFClick to send altcoins to this BTC address
Debit: -0.01 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.00069 BTC
Net amount: -0.01069 BTC
Transaction ID: d1ec39f4d223451391f0ae8f819cc1d329beb3c05a1e49c0b85bd6e39f3bc5ba-000
Still not sure what went wrong with the third BTC to BitBTC transaction.
I have now imported both compressed and uncompressed private keys again into my wallets for good measure and will try again.
Also when I use wallet_account_update_active_key the bitshares console says key_already_registered: key belongs to other account?
-
I have now imported both compressed and uncompressed private keys again into my wallets for good measure and will try again.
Please don't try again - the old system you used has been shut down in favor of a much improved system which will launch soon :)
-
I have now imported both compressed and uncompressed private keys again into my wallets for good measure and will try again.
Please don't try again - the old system you used has been shut down in favor of a much improved system which will launch soon :)
Cool
-
Have you guys considered issuing a UIA to raise some funds for liquidity? Distributing some of your fees to shareholders would do the trick!
Maybe it's not too easy due to regulations, but have you already though about it?
-
Have you guys considered issuing a UIA to raise some funds for liquidity? Distributing some of your fees to shareholders would do the trick!
Maybe it's not too easy due to regulations, but have you already though about it?
We have talked about it - like you say its difficult due to regulations to offer a dividend paying asset.
-
Hi everyone,
Very busy week! Launched metaexchange.info! Started with trading pair bitBTC/BTC, so far we have processed 3.5 BTC worth of transactions and we are just getting started.
I made a start on abstracting the bitBTC/BTC processing into a system which will support multiple different trading pairs and markets with the appropriate API calls to enable any vendor to use metaexchange to fulfil their BTC->bitAsset conversion needs.
This coming week I will be finishing off the API and working on something which will be incredibly useful for all traders on the bitshares dex.
Stay tuned!
Cheers, Paul.
-
pls considering also to go with ssl :) thx
-
pls considering also to go with ssl :) thx
Oh yeah! Not just consider, it is essential. You are dealing with money, so man-in-the-middle attacks would be very profitable. The MITM would just swap out the BTC addresses and BTS account names as appropriate to steal the BTC and BitAssets.
-
pls considering also to go with ssl :) thx
Good point - I'll get it sorted :)
-
Ok, update time again!
New version has been pushed live, new features:
* API fully up and running, with documentation
* HTTPS with HTTP->HTTPS redirect
* www.metaexchange.info working
* Website now displays your transactions as well as all transactions, which makes seeing refunds and watching transaction status much easier
* Market engine is now ready for new markets to be added
Github is upto date as well!
Next come the new markets, exciting times ahead!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Great work, see a wrong tekst when I click sell bitBTC:
Once you enter your bitcoin receiving address, we will generate your deposit address and send your bitcoins to you the instant we receive your bitBTC.
Where shall we send your bitcoins?
Just used it to sell BTC -> bitBTS and and never bought BTS so cheap!
Thanks
-
Keep up the good work.
Hope to see BTC - BitUSD soon as it should help the profitability of minebitshares.com and reduce reliance on external exchanges.
-
Keep up the good work.
Hope to see BTC - BitUSD soon as it should help the profitability of minebitshares.com and reduce reliance on external exchanges.
This is my current task :)
-
Can you look at Tether USD -> BitUSD and vis-versa ?
-
Can you look at Tether USD -> BitUSD and vis-versa ?
Let me look into it :)
-
Can you look at Tether USD -> BitUSD and vis-versa ?
Let me look into it :)
Yes please!
-
feature request:
can you show the QR code of the BTC address?
-
feature request:
can you show the QR code of the BTC address?
Thanks for reminding me, I had that planned, but then forgot :)
-
Update time again!
Very close to adding a bitUSD market now - all the technology is in place, just need to get it set up. The architecture of metaexchange has evolved as well; it was always designed to run a daemon (which processes the actual orders) as well as the site itself with the daemon on a totally different piece of hardware from the site, but now there can be multiple daemons, in different locations around the world!
What this means is that we can start to build business relationships with 'liquidity providers', who will host one (or more) metaexchange markets. The API will route orders to whichever liquidity provider is running the market in which the trade is placed. This means zero counterparty risk for the liquidity providers and the same low to none risk for our customers!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Update time again!
Very close to adding a bitUSD market now - all the technology is in place, just need to get it set up. The architecture of metaexchange has evolved as well; it was always designed to run a daemon (which processes the actual orders) as well as the site itself with the daemon on a totally different piece of hardware from the site, but now there can be multiple daemons, in different locations around the world!
What this means is that we can start to build business relationships with 'liquidity providers', who will host one (or more) metaexchange markets. The API will route orders to whichever liquidity provider is running the market in which the trade is placed. This means zero counterparty risk for the liquidity providers and the same low to none risk for our customers!
Cheers, Paul.
+5% Looking forward :)
-
Wow ... +5% .. you published the code already?
-
Wow ... +5% .. you published the code already?
Yes, the github is up to date.
-
Coolio
-
Hi,
How long does this service take? I sold 1.12 bitBTC 20 mins ago and it still says "processing". I noticed the memo cuts off the last 2 letters of the recieving bitcoin address, is that normal? (I'm guessing I should I have edited the auto-filled memo to contain the full address...)
Also in Safari it doesn't work, the site gives a "missing parameter" error, I had to use firefox.
http://i.imgur.com/0UhCIcX.png (happens if I try the buy and sell side)
-
hi matt,
it will send your bitBTC back, if the memofield is not correct, but maybe your client is not showing correct, because you should already recieved the bitBTC back. I had a similar problem and just needed to "reprodcast". Was shown under the in processing information. Seems a client problem, but i am not a coder. Paul will looking into it, if something was going wrong.
Thanks for the information with safari.
p.s.
i just checked the balances and it seems, like we have more bitBTC. So Paul will looking into it, seems you found a bug :D Thanks for trying metaexchange and helping us to increase the reliability.
-
pls send me your final logo when ready! Will update deposit/withdraw oage then!
-
Not sure if this has anything to do with you or with bitcoin itself but today I made 2 transfers from BTC to bitBTC very quickly as usually.
Then I made a 3rd transfer and on bitcoin blockchain the transaction is unconfirmed for about 5 hours now I think.. If this has something to do with metaexchange then maybe you can have a look at it. If it has to do with bitcoin and the whole miners confirmation then bitcoin sucks...5 hours..lol..That must be the longest ever for a single confirmation..
-
Hi,
How long does this service take? I sold 1.12 bitBTC 20 mins ago and it still says "processing". I noticed the memo cuts off the last 2 letters of the recieving bitcoin address, is that normal? (I'm guessing I should I have edited the auto-filled memo to contain the full address...)
Also in Safari it doesn't work, the site gives a "missing parameter" error, I had to use firefox.
http://i.imgur.com/0UhCIcX.png (happens if I try the buy and sell side)
Hi Matt,
Sorry you had trouble - and thanks for reporting the bug, you've found a couple there! I have manually credited your transaction for you.
The primary bug was with my account name validation - I had forgotten to include numbers in the whitelist of valid characters! I can't fix the bug until tomorrow, so hold off on sending any further transactions until I confirm the fix :)
I'll take a look at the problem you found in safari as well tomorrow.
Cheers, Paul.
-
Not sure if this has anything to do with you or with bitcoin itself but today I made 2 transfers from BTC to bitBTC very quickly as usually.
Then I made a 3rd transfer and on bitcoin blockchain the transaction is unconfirmed for about 5 hours now I think.. If this has something to do with metaexchange then maybe you can have a look at it. If it has to do with bitcoin and the whole miners confirmation then bitcoin sucks...5 hours..lol..That must be the longest ever for a single confirmation..
Do you have the txid? I'll take a look for you :)
-
Update time again!
Very close to adding a bitUSD market now - all the technology is in place, just need to get it set up. The architecture of metaexchange has evolved as well; it was always designed to run a daemon (which processes the actual orders) as well as the site itself with the daemon on a totally different piece of hardware from the site, but now there can be multiple daemons, in different locations around the world!
What this means is that we can start to build business relationships with 'liquidity providers', who will host one (or more) metaexchange markets. The API will route orders to whichever liquidity provider is running the market in which the trade is placed. This means zero counterparty risk for the liquidity providers and the same low to none risk for our customers!
Cheers, Paul.
Sounds awesome!! Curious.. who would be some examples of liquidity providers?
+5%
-
We're finally getting some real solutions to the make-shift solutions that Nubits has. +5%
-
Sounds awesome!! Curious.. who would be some examples of liquidity providers?
+5%
We're working with one party at the moment, can't really say anything just yet. We will always consider any potential candidate who has access to a server and is a trusted community member - there are a lot of potential bitshares markets available!
-
Not sure if this has anything to do with you or with bitcoin itself but today I made 2 transfers from BTC to bitBTC very quickly as usually.
Then I made a 3rd transfer and on bitcoin blockchain the transaction is unconfirmed for about 5 hours now I think.. If this has something to do with metaexchange then maybe you can have a look at it. If it has to do with bitcoin and the whole miners confirmation then bitcoin sucks...5 hours..lol..That must be the longest ever for a single confirmation..
Do you have the txid? I'll take a look for you :)
Actually minutes after my post the transaction got through...spooky.. ::)
So everything is fine now. Thanks
-
Actually minutes after my post the transaction got through...spooky.. ::)
So everything is fine now. Thanks
Glad it worked out ok :)
-
Also in Safari it doesn't work, the site gives a "missing parameter" error, I had to use firefox.
http://i.imgur.com/0UhCIcX.png (happens if I try the buy and sell side)
Ok, the bug which stopped you from receiving your bitcoins is fixed, but I'm unable to repro the screenshot in safari - are you using anything which might be blocking hidden web form fields from being posted?
-
Also in Safari it doesn't work, the site gives a "missing parameter" error, I had to use firefox.
http://i.imgur.com/0UhCIcX.png (happens if I try the buy and sell side)
Ok, the bug which stopped you from receiving your bitcoins is fixed, but I'm unable to repro the screenshot in safari - are you using anything which might be blocking hidden web form fields from being posted?
Not that I'm aware of. Weirdly it works fine on my 7 year old mac laptop with an older version of Safari but not on my much newer desktop with Safari 7.1.3. It doesn't show the "maximum per transaction number" and at the moment doesn't do anything if I click "submit".
http://i.imgur.com/qCeEUYp.png
Thanks for the manual crediting, BTC received.
-
Not that I'm aware of. Weirdly it works fine on my 7 year old mac laptop with an older version of Safari but not on my much newer desktop with Safari 7.1.3. It doesn't show the "maximum per transaction number" and at the moment doesn't do anything if I click "submit".
http://i.imgur.com/qCeEUYp.png
Thanks for the manual crediting, BTC received.
Very strange! It looks as if javascript is not enabled, or has failed horribly somewhere.
-
Usually, the culprit for failed javascript that is inconsistent across the same browsers is because of ad block.
-
Update time again!
So, busy doesn't even begin to describe the last week! So many conference calls with potential business partners, new ideas, new relationships... All very exciting stuff.
Service and site wise, the new markets are up and running! Rune and Riverhead are running their own metaexchange node providing liquidity for the BTC/bitUSD market, which went rather smoothly, actually.
I've added a price discovery module which attempts to set the market prices based on order flow. It's only enabled for BTS market at the moment - lets see how it goes.
edit: I've also added a QR code for the bitcoin address to make mobile use easier.
Next I'm going to add support which ElMato requires for limewallet integration, which will be huge :)
-
edit: I've also added a QR code for the bitcoin address to make mobile use easier.
Yhea .. thanks
Next I'm going to add support which ElMato requires for limewallet integration, which will be huge :)
Can you feel the bam already? I do 8)
-
Just curious.. does MetaExchange support multi-sig transfer or escrow?
-
Just curious.. does MetaExchange support multi-sig transfer or escrow?
Not currently. What is your use case?
-
Unconfirmed transaction problem
Hi MetaExchange,
I used your site yesterday to try to convert some BTS to BTC, but the transaction doesn't seem to be confirming (I guess because zero fees?) :-/
https://blockchain.info/tx/1ab5af1d83e686fb7f1604bedc8f69a1907fa97434d8161c9e64ec17872ef4b8
Can you help?
thanks in advance
-
Unconfirmed transaction problem
Hi MetaExchange,
I used your site yesterday to try to convert some BTS to BTC, but the transaction doesn't seem to be confirming (I guess because zero fees?) :-/
https://blockchain.info/tx/1ab5af1d83e686fb7f1604bedc8f69a1907fa97434d8161c9e64ec17872ef4b8
Can you help?
thanks in advance
Hi there,
Oh wow, sorry about that - I've configured bitcoind with a minimum transaction fee, but it doesn't appear to be getting used...
At the moment I'm not sure I can do anything because I cannot re-send the transaction with higher fees. I guess the only thing to suggest is to wait a bit longer for it to confirm. If it eventually doesn't get picked up, contact me and I will manually resend it.
I've sent you 0.01 BTC from my own account as a sorry :)
Cheers, Paul.
-
It may be a bit soon but any thoughts on running a bts to bitsilver/bitgold bridge?
-
It looks like the miner fee was not included in tx and my BTC from MetaExchange hasn't been included in a block yet.
Its been almost 2 days now.
tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/6eb6636ca1f52bc2e251f8a9e1fdf686493c697a4fe56b348d85224de2c9bdcf
-
It looks like the miner fee was not included in tx and my BTC from MetaExchange hasn't been included in a block yet.
Its been almost 2 days now.
tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/6eb6636ca1f52bc2e251f8a9e1fdf686493c697a4fe56b348d85224de2c9bdcf
God, sorry about this - do you have the correct TXID, that one shows 28 confirms?
-
Can you provide a receipt for each transaction, preferrably with your company name and address on it?
(I'm looking for a way to transform my future delegate income into fiat without my tax advisor killing me. A receipt for BTS->BTC conversions would be extremely helpful.)
-
It looks like the miner fee was not included in tx and my BTC from MetaExchange hasn't been included in a block yet.
Its been almost 2 days now.
tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/6eb6636ca1f52bc2e251f8a9e1fdf686493c697a4fe56b348d85224de2c9bdcf
God, sorry about this - do you have the correct TXID, that one shows 28 confirms?
LOL ... oh dear. I failed to check it before posing. Looks like the issue is with Poloniex. I had no way of knowing the txID as I sent it to an exchange. that's the link Poloniex sent me. It did take 24hr at least to confirm though.. : D Thanks.
-
Can you provide a receipt for each transaction, preferrably with your company name and address on it?
(I'm looking for a way to transform my future delegate income into fiat without my tax advisor killing me. A receipt for BTS->BTC conversions would be extremely helpful.)
maybe in the future, but not in right now!
-
Update:
If you are using a multi-sig bitcoin wallet, could you hold off on buying from metaexchange at the moment - we have a bug which fails to refund a transaction (should a refund be needed - over max size for instance) because it is unable to compute the sender's address. I'm working on a fix :)
-
Can you provide a receipt for each transaction, preferrably with your company name and address on it?
(I'm looking for a way to transform my future delegate income into fiat without my tax advisor killing me. A receipt for BTS->BTC conversions would be extremely helpful.)
maybe in the future, but not in right now!
BTS > EUR/USD etc would be much better then conversion to BTC IMO .. ;)
-
BTS > EUR/USD etc would be much better then conversion to BTC IMO .. ;)
Yes - do you know a gateway where that's possible?
BTS->BTC->EUR is possible. The shapeshift.io API allows requesting an email receipt (for BTS->BTC), and several BTC->EUR gateways exist.
-
Yes - do you know a gateway where that's possible?
BTS->BTC->EUR is possible. The shapeshift.io API allows requesting an email receipt (for BTS->BTC), and several BTC->EUR gateways exist.
Can you not use https://www.ccedk.com/ to withdraw to fiat?
-
That's possible, but I'd prefer a gateway where I don't have to do any trading. Just send BTS, receive fiat.
-
That's possible, but I'd prefer a gateway where I don't have to do any trading. Just send BTS, receive fiat.
yes but IMO you won't be able to achieve this, unless you're using an exchange or company with money transmitter licenses, if you want to get
directly from BTS to EUR et vice versa... Is this how you want to deal with? Like bitcoin.de for bitshares?
-
Cool - we just got listed on coinmarketcap.com :)
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares-x/#markets
Just need some more volume, now!
-
Cool - we just got listed on coinmarketcap.com :)
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares-x/#markets
Just need some more volume, now!
The spread is much higher than centralised exchange when bts=>btc, even after taking into account of the fee. Why is that?
-
Cool - we just got listed on coinmarketcap.com :)
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares-x/#markets
Just need some more volume, now!
The spread is much higher than centralised exchange when bts=>btc, even after taking into account of the fee. Why is that?
We are not . As an example . if you buy on poloniex 1 btc you get righ now 25975 bts minus fees . on metaexchange you get 26530 bts minus fee .
-
Cool - we just got listed on coinmarketcap.com :)
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares-x/#markets
Just need some more volume, now!
The spread is much higher than centralised exchange when bts=>btc, even after taking into account of the fee. Why is that?
We are not . As an example . if you buy on poloniex 1 btc you get righ now 25975 bts minus fees . on metaexchange you get 26530 bts minus fee .
I am saying the other way - convert bts to btc.
-
I am saying the other way - convert bts to btc.
Our spread is currently fixed at 3% - the bid/ask will move around depending on our own internal inventory.
-
Don't look to the first rate if you sell bts worth 1 btc you pay in metaexchange 27530 and in poloniex 27660 so we are also better . but to be clear . you don't need to set up a account with us . we are Holding your funds a couple oft seconds and our sole purpose is to get other Crypto easier into bitshares or assets on the bitshares blockchain .
So for me the answer is clear which service you want to use .
-
Don't look to the first rate if you sell bts worth 1 btc you pay in metaexchange 27530 and in poloniex 27660 so we are also better . but to be clear . you don't need to set up a account with us . we are Holding your funds a couple oft seconds and our sole purpose is to get other Crypto easier into bitshares or assets on the bitshares blockchain .
So for me the answer is clear which service you want to use .
I think this is a good value-add. +5%
-
+5%
-
Update time again!
Busy week again, been working mostly on the referral partner fee sharing support, not much to see visually. The site got a logo finally and I fixed a bug which was causing transactions to be sent with 0 fee if bitcoind decided that was a good idea.
Going to add a new market next week with the help of another liquidity provider, if all goes to plan!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Going to add a new market next week with the help of another liquidity provider, if all goes to plan!
Exciting news! Will it be bitSilver?
-
We will definitely make more volume the following days :) +5
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D
-
Wow, we transferred over half quantity of BTS/BTC as BTC38.com last night!
(http://i.imgur.com/kHtFHi2.jpg)
:D
-
Wow, we transferred over half quantity of BTS/BTC as BTC38.com last night!
(http://i.imgur.com/kHtFHi2.jpg)
:D
This is only the calm before the storm... wait for it. ;)
-
I tested a small exchange of 100 BTS into BTC using API calls and it went through smoothly. Good work!
Only I can't get the getMyLastTransactions to return anything, no matter if I provide the deposit address or the memo. It always comes back with an empty list.
And for the wishlist: it would be nice if getOrderStatus could be used with a short transaction id prefix, as displayed by wallet_account_transaction_history.
-
I tested a small exchange of 100 BTS into BTC using API calls and it went through smoothly. Good work!
Only I can't get the getMyLastTransactions to return anything, no matter if I provide the deposit address or the memo. It always comes back with an empty list.
And for the wishlist: it would be nice if getOrderStatus could be used with a short transaction id prefix, as displayed by wallet_account_transaction_history.
Hi pc,
When you call getMyLastTransactions, does it just return an empty array, or do you get an error?
Here is a raw dump of a valid POST from the site iteself:
POST https://metaexchange.info/api/1/getMyLastTransactions HTTP/1.1
Host: metaexchange.info
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 64
Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*
Origin: https://metaexchange.info
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Referer: https://metaexchange.info/markets/BTS/BTC
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: en-GB,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.6
limit=6&memo=&deposit_address=16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa
and the raw reponse:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json
Server: Mono-HTTPAPI/1.0
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:46:36 GMT
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
835
[{"received_txid":"9c643cbcc1dec2b53f148dbbff409056093b71a3ec498ead3cd03dfc836b5630","sent_txid":"1e138a0310e8f648b80bb7090cecfe1b3e192860","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"31.23019","price":"0.00003202","fee":"0.09369057","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1426149873,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"},{"received_txid":"d45f25d54289bb20bbf04bbf771895a9de96e0fc06a20b96d44a8ceb059d5a75","sent_txid":"55e659ae8f6670455473e75e38c55235d522db8f","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"30.74056","price":"0.00003253","fee":"0.09222168","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1425990761,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"},{"received_txid":"1a3c596ed90d322920f72a31d1e6771fe7bfb745d12bdd107a7473b84e6924c6","sent_txid":"798d5ce0d2a29287fbbaa0e506df358082478c9a","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"24.18937","price":"0.00004134","fee":"0.07256811","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1425323492,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"},{"received_txid":"e70444c652b62a46288d9265eb74c45b65bafc87e779b2954724065ce5089ca8","sent_txid":"50245ba12aa5d6500f105732d20564cd2f1ebef3","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"22.85164","price":"0.00004376","fee":"0.06855492","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1425158352,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"},{"received_txid":"d1e741003fafd637d61a47f4db1422a6a36a2fd3f58cfec6f1f9fc391ddb1b26","sent_txid":"91dd4b235c700f17f54327190406091cecc03432","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"21.28547","price":"0.00004698","fee":"0.06385641","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1424987808,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"},{"received_txid":"851a7552f4eccead98ff5c05202601c33901988f37b87f9b86594c471d0c2207","sent_txid":"ad787f8134955743e979bf6d136f44a1f4390c02","order_type":"buy","symbol_pair":"BTS_BTC","amount":"18.27737","price":"0.00005471","fee":"0.05483211","status":"completed","notes":null,"date":1424983117,"deposit_address":"16UDNbw4EB7B6KNy9TzEVrUjHgUQftLeQa"}]
0
-
Thanks for the quick reply. It was my fault - I used GET instead of POST.
-
Thanks for the quick reply. It was my fault - I used GET instead of POST.
Most of the API is POST, except for getAllMarkets :)
-
Update time again!
New market was added in partnership with spartako: https://metaexchange.info/markets/BTC/bitCNY
I've also made the buy feedback much better now so that you get a 'pending' transaction appear in 'Your transactions' at 0 confirmations which will eventually update to the final price at 1 confirmation. Code wise, I've migrated away from having an enum of currency types because that makes adding new currencies a rebuild and redeploy of the code - this is now database controlled so adding new asset types is a synch.
Next week I will be adding support for UIA issue instead to be used in place of transfer asset to support crowdfunding.
-
Markets down for upgrade to 0.7.0:
bitBTC/BTC
BTS/BTC
Back soon :)
-
Ok, all markets are back up and running...
-
NOTE: please do not make direct deposits from exchanges to metaexchange deposit addresses. At the moment we tie one deposit transaction to one output transaction which means there is a chance your deposit would be bundled together with another deposit in the same transaction. One would be processed and the other would get stuck and need to be manually processed.
We would like to fix this for the future, but for now please avoid it. Send from your wallets only, sorry for the inconvenience :)
-
We would like to fix this for the future, but for now please avoid it. Send from your wallets only, sorry for the inconvenience :)
lol .. that shouldn't be an invonvenience but the default behavior :)
-
I never received my order last night 25 BitUSD :(
-
I never received my order last night 25 BitUSD :(
Transaction went through: http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=2106825
Is your wallet fully sync'd? I can PM you more transaction details if it'd help figure out where it went.
-
I never received my order last night 25 BitUSD :(
Transaction went through: http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=2106825
Is your wallet fully sync'd? I can PM you more transaction details if it'd help figure out where it went.
The wallet can't synced. It seems to work but he didn't do it.
-
The upgrade to 0.8 has solved the problem.
-
The upgrade to 0.8 has solved the problem.
Glad to hear!
-
:)
-
Hey.
Been trying to convert BitUSD to BTC but both the web wallet and local wallet says that the Memo is too long.
-
Hey.
Been trying to convert BitUSD to BTC but both the web wallet and local wallet says that the Memo is too long.
What version of the client are you using?
-
Hey.
Been trying to convert BitUSD to BTC but both the web wallet and local wallet says that the Memo is too long.
What version of the client are you using?
The web wallet uses v 0.8.0. I'm not at my main computer at the moment but I think I run the latest there.
-
Can you send me a pm with the address you entered into the site so I can try and reproduce the problem?
-
Can you send me a pm with the address you entered into the site so I can try and reproduce the problem?
PM sent
Edit: nvm, Set up the wallet on my work machine and I could send it here.
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
That is a wonderful idea and I want to see this, too. Something like a greasemonkey plugin that adds a "paywith bitUSD inestead" to the btc buttons automatically!!
+5
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
Great idea. I have no idea how to do that but it's a great idea :). Maybe I'll put out a bounty...
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
You can do this already with ShapeShifts Lens https://shapeshift.io/tools.html
It would be nice to have something similar for metaexchange
Edit: direct link: https://shapeshift.io/tools.html#lens
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
You can do this already with ShapeShifts Lens https://shapeshift.io/tools.html
It would be nice to have something similar for metaexchange
That's a merchant tool I think @rgcrypto is asking for a browser plugin that adds the BTS payment option to any BTC payment option on the client side ..
But yhea ... a merchant tool like the above would be a good start too!
-
will you have a chrome/firefox plugin for spending our bitusd on websites that already accept BTC?
You can do this already with ShapeShifts Lens https://shapeshift.io/tools.html
It would be nice to have something similar for metaexchange
That's a merchant tool I think @rgcrypto is asking for a browser plugin that adds the BTS payment option to any BTC payment option on the client side ..
But yhea ... a merchant tool like the above would be a good start too!
They have 2 tools. The shifty button is a merchant tool ... ShapeShift Lens is a browser pluggin for both firefox and chrome, that does exactly what rg is asking. On the page I linked, you'll have to click the Lens button to get the relevant video and info for that tool.
Edit: heres the direct link: https://shapeshift.io/tools.html#lens
-
Thanks Xeldal. That's pretty cool.
-
Update time!
Back from a week's holiday - most of this week has been spent preparing the code base to support issuing UIAs as well as plain asset transfers. I also looked at getting pay to public key working, so unregistered users can still use metaexchange. Both features were required by the moonstone fundraiser which has been my main priority.
Cheers, Paul.
-
We're pleased to announce that bitGOLD and bitSILVER are now available on metaexchange!
https://metaexchange.info/markets/bitGOLD/BTC
https://metaexchange.info/markets/bitSILVER/BTC
Enjoy :)
-
Low Hanging Fruit: GetGems.org :)
-
Ok, following some thought on the subject of flipped markets, I have hidden the BTC/bitUSD and BTC/bitCNY markets from the main metaexchange site's list and added bitUSD/BTC and bitCNY/BTC to replace them.
The old markets are still accessable and functional, but are not promoted - the idea is to smoothly transition across to the new markets, which will help developers integrating with our API and also 'fixes' a couple of bugs which were logged against the old flipped versions of these markets.
-
Update time!
Major features this time around are:
* CORS for API usage - this will let developers embed metaexchange widgets directly on their own web-pages and allow any HTML/JS based wallet to call out to our servers directly (think wallet integration)
* Added bitsharesblocks.com/blockchain.info transaction links in 'Your transactions' in each market; this should help people with support requests and just makes things that much easier to work with for customers
* Flipped markets are now deprecated and have been replaced with non flipped versions - the old ones will continue to function for a while, until I see that the volume traded on them is consistently 0
Next stuff in the pipe... I'm looking into the feasibility of adding limit orders(!) This would allow users to profit from large orders that we cannot fill ourselves, would increase liquidity and expand our order fulfilment capacity.
-
Update time!
Major features this time around are:
* CORS for API usage - this will let developers embed metaexchange widgets directly on their own web-pages and allow any HTML/JS based wallet to call out to our servers directly (think wallet integration)
* Added bitsharesblocks.com/blockchain.info transaction links in 'Your transactions' in each market; this should help people with support requests and just makes things that much easier to work with for customers
* Flipped markets are now deprecated and have been replaced with non flipped versions - the old ones will continue to function for a while, until I see that the volume traded on them is consistently 0
Next stuff in the pipe... I'm looking into the feasibility of adding limit orders(!) This would allow users to profit from large orders that we cannot fill ourselves, would increase liquidity and expand our order fulfilment capacity.
Well done.
-
* CORS for API usage - this will let developers embed metaexchange widgets directly on their own web-pages and allow any HTML/JS based wallet to call out to our servers directly (think wallet integration)
Waiting for an integration!
+5%
-
Update time again!
Full steam ahead on the limit order engine! This will allow users to place resting orders on our order books using the same anonymous order placement system we are using currently. This will allow metaexchange to become the first anonymous, fully featured exchange.
As well as standard limit orders, I am also adding support for market orders with slippage parameter.
I'm very excited about the limit order engine, it will allow us to greatly increase our liquidity while also allowing our users to take advantage of speculating on markets which don't exist on any other exchange.
Cheers, Paul.
-
This will allow metaexchange to become the first anonymous, fully featured exchange.
more like the second :P
How would I go to cancel a limit order?
-
more like the second :P
How would I go to cancel a limit order?
Which is the first?
Limit orders will have an expiry field which will let you chose the time they live for. Once expired, they are refunded to sender.
-
more like the second :P
How would I go to cancel a limit order?
Which is the first?
I'd say BitShares is the first anonymous full-featured exchange :P
Limit orders will have an expiry field which will let you chose the time they live for. Once expired, they are refunded to sender.
Make's sense .. thanks for the clarification
-
more like the second :P
How would I go to cancel a limit order?
Which is the first?
Limit orders will have an expiry field which will let you chose the time they live for. Once expired, they are refunded to sender.
Nice added feature! +5%
-
I'd say BitShares is the first anonymous full-featured exchange :P
Doh! I should have written 'first anonymous, fully featured, centralised exchange'
-
I made deposit to this address: 12jw7KYtRbfSo24XVQMMaBYTefF89zaZXP
https://blockchain.info/tx/cb2a5a88f99316029d92c9f9a50ebac8f6ed63c7c50b15587165059e3f454140
After 11 confirmations, I still did not get the bitUSD on my bitshares account that I specified. maybe you can help, thanks.
-
I made deposit to this address: 12jw7KYtRbfSo24XVQMMaBYTefF89zaZXP
https://blockchain.info/tx/cb2a5a88f99316029d92c9f9a50ebac8f6ed63c7c50b15587165059e3f454140
After 11 confirmations, I still did not get the bitUSD on my bitshares account that I specified. maybe you can help, thanks.
Sorry you are having problems - we are looking into it :)
-
I made deposit to this address: 12jw7KYtRbfSo24XVQMMaBYTefF89zaZXP
https://blockchain.info/tx/cb2a5a88f99316029d92c9f9a50ebac8f6ed63c7c50b15587165059e3f454140
After 11 confirmations, I still did not get the bitUSD on my bitshares account that I specified. maybe you can help, thanks.
Ok, your transaction should have gone through now:
http://www.bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=2349096
Sorry for the delay :)
-
@monsterer
I just wanted to say thank you for rearranging the Markets drop-down menu on MetaExchange.
It's way easier to read now. Looks awesome! :)
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 (https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723) could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
Which pair were you exchanging with? BTS/BTC?
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 (https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723) could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
Which pair were you exchanging with? BTS/BTC?
yes that is right BTS/BTC
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 (https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723) could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
Which pair were you exchanging with? BTS/BTC?
yes that is right BTS/BTC
monsterer will look into it.
-
monsterer will look into it.
roger that. i PM'd him a link to this page so he can update us.
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
Hi there,
Sorry you are having trouble - what happened was: the deposit was over the deposit limit, which triggered an automatic refund, but the system detected a multi-sig deposit address (probably sent from an exchange, or non-standard wallet), so was unable to complete the refund.
If you give me your refund address, I can manually return your deposit :)
We are adding support for user defined refund addresses in the near future to prevent this from happening.
Cheers, Paul.
-
HI i made a deposit to address 1MDYmihRyZjmCHTQec4LbMobKaX7aSnLGd
it got 137 conformation https://blockchain.info/tx/d39d4aea4c31b52854298307ddb426ce4bdf19af43e736bface05e0c04ea5723 could someone help complete this transaction that is still in the process stage.
Hi there,
Sorry you are having trouble - what happened was: the deposit was over the deposit limit, which triggered an automatic refund, but the system detected a multi-sig deposit address (probably sent from an exchange, or non-standard wallet), so was unable to complete the refund.
If you give me your refund address, I can manually return your deposit :)
We are adding support for user defined refund addresses in the near future to prevent this from happening.
Cheers, Paul.
hi thanks for the respond i thought it was because of that, here is my address 3KobEftucTiYX1pu4Ry55C7dYbZDfrLvNo
-
hi thanks for the respond i thought it was because of that, here is my address 3KobEftucTiYX1pu4Ry55C7dYbZDfrLvNo
Here is your refund: https://blockchain.info/tx/234cf7cf88576c3ac591cb55807bc46e6a2684c6d487a50e81aba25b773e657f
Cheers, Paul.
-
hi thanks for the respond i thought it was because of that, here is my address 3KobEftucTiYX1pu4Ry55C7dYbZDfrLvNo
Here is your refund: https://blockchain.info/tx/234cf7cf88576c3ac591cb55807bc46e6a2684c6d487a50e81aba25b773e657f
Cheers, Paul.
Hey thanks i got the refund but it did it again i split the trade two .50 btc transaction and one of them did not get process https://blockchain.info/tx/357549a3af42abef4a7313b80c37544be2f354112abcd8eb2dc3528ebece9c55 . each transaction was less then the minimum .
-
Hey thanks i got the refund but it did it again i split the trade two .50 btc transaction and one of them did not get process https://blockchain.info/tx/357549a3af42abef4a7313b80c37544be2f354112abcd8eb2dc3528ebece9c55 . each transaction was less then the minimum .
Here you go: https://blockchain.info/tx/8361ea2f5f088b31b7d2a96a45b3ead2b8c786494212726b1e3e0c4f65ff29b1 :)
-
BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC are down while we upgrade to 0.9.0, thank you for your patience :)
-
Upgraded and BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC are back online
-
Upgrading the USD/SILVER/GOLD to BTC pair on Metaexchange. The service will be down for about 15 minutes.
Upgrade is complete.
-
Update time again!
So, not much new to see on the site at the moment because I am still working out the last few implementation details of the limit order engine. I can share a sneak peek screenshot, tho (don't worry the orderbook is just fake prices atm):
(http://i.imgur.com/6VS3PGm.jpg)
Oh yeah, following the update to 0.9.0 metaexchange now supports using bitshares public keys as well as account names, so those with unregistered accounts can use us too!
Cheers, Paul.
-
+5% +5% +5%
-
Update time again!
So, not much new to see on the site at the moment because I am still working out the last few implementation details of the limit order engine. I can share a sneak peek screenshot, tho (don't worry the orderbook is just fake prices atm):
(http://i.imgur.com/6VS3PGm.jpg)
Oh yeah, following the update to 0.9.0 metaexchange now supports using bitshares public keys as well as account names, so those with unregistered accounts can use us too!
Cheers, Paul.
Since 0.9.0 you can even use ADDRESSES in transfers directly .. will metaExchange support this too?
Would allow to send funds to coldstorage directly
-
Update time again!
So, not much new to see on the site at the moment because I am still working out the last few implementation details of the limit order engine. I can share a sneak peek screenshot, tho (don't worry the orderbook is just fake prices atm):
(http://i.imgur.com/6VS3PGm.jpg)
Oh yeah, following the update to 0.9.0 metaexchange now supports using bitshares public keys as well as account names, so those with unregistered accounts can use us too!
Cheers, Paul.
wow very nice.. great work and innovation! +5%
-
hey paul, don't know if this was posted here before ... but i'm getting a weird message when trying to access metaxchange site via chrome ...
(http://i.imgur.com/ObQKtc6.png)
-
hey paul, don't know if this was posted here before ... but i'm getting a weird message when trying to access metaxchange site via chrome ...
(http://i.imgur.com/ObQKtc6.png)
Very odd - is this on a mac?
-
hey paul, don't know if this was posted here before ... but i'm getting a weird message when trying to access metaxchange site via chrome ...
(http://i.imgur.com/ObQKtc6.png)
Very odd - is this on a mac?
yep ... due this guess most users will avoid to continue ...
-
Wild guess: the server has SSLVerifyClient (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ssl.html#sslverifyclient) set to "optional".
Most users won't be affected because they don't have any client certificates in their browser.
-
Something seems off.
Your site listed BTS:BTC rate as 1 BTC => 54,600 BTS which is 1 / 54,600 = .00001831
(it was much lower than this(2 mins ago) when I actually placed the order but that is another story)
when you add the fee to this you get an effective rate of .00001831 * 1.003 = .00001837
The above was the listed price when my purchase was confirmed and remained that for some time after.
However, the rate I actually got was listed as .00001837 and you charged me another fee on top of that!
So effectively the rate was .00001837 * 1.003 = .00001842
You're either listing your price incorrectly or your charging your fee twice.
-
It happens everytime.
I've got some pics this time.
I didn't get them all in one pic but you can look up the block timestamp 2015-05-21 20:36:12
1 / 54,391 = .00001838 * 1.003 fee = effective rate of .00001844
(https://i.imgur.com/0RYnPqz.jpg)
The rate I actually got is .00001851
which is roughly .00001844 * 1.003 second fee = .00001850
(https://i.imgur.com/KVMRv0g.jpg)
What am I missing?
-
Hi Xeldal,
That particular market is using a prototype liquidity sensitive pricing model, in which the fill price depends on the volume you order. If you send a small amount you should get the listed price. I understand this isn't ideal, as it is far from being transparent, which is why this is getting scrapped when the limit order system comes on line. The system also adjusts the prices after every filled transaction, which might be part of what you are seeing for sequentially placed transactions at least.
Cheers, Paul.
-
Hi Xeldal,
That particular market is using a prototype liquidity sensitive pricing model, in which the fill price depends on the volume you order. If you send a small amount you should get the listed price. I understand this isn't ideal, as it is far from being transparent, which is why this is getting scrapped when the limit order system comes on line. The system also adjusts the prices after every filled transaction, which might be part of what you are seeing for sequentially placed transactions at least.
Cheers, Paul.
monsterer, how will the limit order system work? Will the price in that system also be sensitive to liquidity or no longer? Thanks.
-
monsterer, how will the limit order system work? Will the price in that system also be sensitive to liquidity or no longer? Thanks.
The limit order system will feature an orderbook, which contains the internal market makers orders listed for everyone to see (along with everyone else's limit orders). They will be staggered in price, probably at three different price levels for the same volume.
-
BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC markets are currently down due to an ISP service outage.
-
sorry our service is down longer then expected. We hope the ISP will solve the problem soon. Always on weekends :'(
-
sorry our service is down longer then expected. We hope the ISP will solve the problem soon. Always on weekends :'(
One good reason to have two conversion gateways I guess. Blocktrades.us can handle trades in the meantime.
-
I would suggest a sync to a standby server at the bunker so that in the event of .. well.. this.. you could continue to operate.
DRBD would make it easy for the recovery as well with automatic recovery syncing.
When we get our expansion done after BunkerShares we plan to have our delegates configured in similar manner at remote locations that our cloud system are connected with.
Hope you are recovered in the next 3-4hrs for MineBitShares payouts!
-
Sorry for the extended outage, our ISP has finally resolved their issues.
-
I lost about 184.00 worth of bit coins on meta-exchange in an attempts to buy USD. their are 3 transactions in total, which are listed below:
1) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/8e3975056ad85151c02d07cd6b4655a324f69f371cf7b55de2af16b88aecc17e for 90.70
2) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/e4aee420d3c0056a5d476816e1dc2e882de7af2a591f8f7b15dffcc2f79e16ba for 90.70
3) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/9c6bad7a57df42cef41188dae128571f0b956bbc329b30ac469cf33a66141b7e for 2.82
The username I sent all this to is "gminer6626" and the address meta-exchange gave me is: 1JNZeUnWZUv9MkV76rvvoLfNEpcJuAani2
I Am wondering if this has happened to anybody else. I sure hope I can get my BTC or my bitusd back...this a a hit I can't afford to take at the moment
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/8e3975056ad85151c02d07cd6b4655a324f69f371cf7b55de2af16b88aecc17e 90.70
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/e4aee420d3c0056a5d476816e1dc2e882de7af2a591f8f7b15dffcc2f79e16ba 90.70
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/9c6bad7a57df42cef41188dae128571f0b956bbc329b30ac469cf33a66141b7e 2.83
-
I've asked our liquidity partner to look into these transactions for you - sorry for the delay :)
-
I lost about 184.00 worth of bit coins on meta-exchange in an attempts to buy USD. their are 3 transactions in total, which are listed below:
1) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/8e3975056ad85151c02d07cd6b4655a324f69f371cf7b55de2af16b88aecc17e for 90.70
2) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/e4aee420d3c0056a5d476816e1dc2e882de7af2a591f8f7b15dffcc2f79e16ba for 90.70
3) https://blockchain.info/tx-index/9c6bad7a57df42cef41188dae128571f0b956bbc329b30ac469cf33a66141b7e for 2.82
The username I sent all this to is "gminer6626" and the address meta-exchange gave me is: 1JNZeUnWZUv9MkV76rvvoLfNEpcJuAani2
I Am wondering if this has happened to anybody else. I sure hope I can get my BTC or my bitusd back...this a a hit I can't afford to take at the moment
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/8e3975056ad85151c02d07cd6b4655a324f69f371cf7b55de2af16b88aecc17e 90.70
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/e4aee420d3c0056a5d476816e1dc2e882de7af2a591f8f7b15dffcc2f79e16ba 90.70
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/9c6bad7a57df42cef41188dae128571f0b956bbc329b30ac469cf33a66141b7e 2.83
don't worry riverhead will check it. your money is save!
-
Thank you for the timely responses guys. Very professional
-
Thank you for the timely responses guys. Very professional
thanks for using us!
luckily it is not sleeping hours in europe and america :D
-
Looking into this now. I see a few of your transactions. It'll take me a bit to sift through the log files. We'll make it right no worries :).
-
Thank you, I got back exactly what I wanted at the same rate :) thanks again :)
-
thanks for your support!
-
Thank you, I got back exactly what I wanted at the same rate :) thanks again :)
You bet. Sorry for the trouble!
-
No apologies needed, I didn't loose anything. Shit happends with new technology. Bitshares is the best thing that ever happened to me :)
-
No apologies needed, I didn't loose anything. Shit happends with new technology. Bitshares is the best thing that ever happened to me :)
nice to hear that. Hope we will all enjoy it in the future.
-
It's a wonder why more people don't know about the fast new way of making money sitting on ur ass :)
-
Metaexchange site and BTS/BTC bitBTC/BTC markets are going down for an upgrade to the new limit order engine. ETA 1 hour.
-
Ok, metaexchange is back on-line with new features, and a new GUI layout to accommodate the limit order markets!
To start with, we have opened up BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC limit order markets, so we can gently roll over into the new system.
New features for BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC markets:
*) You can now place limit orders on our using the same registration free process you're used to
*) Set your own refund address for buy orders to avoid the problem where funds are automatically refunded to an exchange's wallet in case of failure
*) Soft refund policy - orders are filled as much as possible and only the remainder is refunded instead of the entire order
*) More liquidity is available in both markets for larger orders
*) Get a quote (using the input boxes at the top) for any given order size before you place your order*
*) See our full orderbooks (using Expert mode)
*) Your browser will now save your bitshares/bitcoin and refund addresses so you don't need to type them in each time
Needless to say this was a big undertaking, which is why there hasn't been an update from me in a while. Nevertheless, we would like to hear your feedback about the new metaexchange, so please let us know what you think!
Cheers, Paul.
-
Looks awesome ... Looking forward to give it a try ..
(http://i.imgur.com/gnMX8xC.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/n6lGm3y.png)
-
Great work guys!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
+5%
Much improved. Good work!
After clicking Submit, nothing happens. Should there be some kind of confirmation that the submitted info was received?
In particular I'd like to be sure the refund address was saved.
-
+5%
Much improved. Good work!
After clicking Submit, nothing happens. Should there be some kind of confirmation that the submitted info was received?
In particular I'd like to be sure the refund address was saved.
Submit should result in your deposit address being displayed. It auto submits when you change focus on the form, so its possible you didn't notice this.
To confirm your refund address was saved, simply close metaexchange, reload and open the market again, erase you refund address, submit and you should see a different deposit address returned. If you then re-enter your original refund address, the old deposit address should be displayed, confirming that it was associated with your refund address.
-
Great Work!
I will try it out today.
-
Good Job!!! Gonna check that out! +5%
-
hi my transaction have been pending pass a 1 conformation , it's up to 4 conformation and it have not been completed user ptcgroup10009
https://blockchain.info/tx/613ca16645119e4873001e495cbbd26d97470b5b1bf7cf86457b65f7d38770a0
if a address is need for a refund here is one 3KmQ5baLYdeHmQhwV9XypHGiYu5MgewEPY
-
hi my transaction have been pending pass a 1 conformation , it's up to 4 conformation and it have not been completed user ptcgroup10009
https://blockchain.info/tx/613ca16645119e4873001e495cbbd26d97470b5b1bf7cf86457b65f7d38770a0
if a address is need for a refund here is one 3KmQ5baLYdeHmQhwV9XypHGiYu5MgewEPY
Sure, no problem, here is the refund:
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf8289c96a3ee5b115528196f01ac29bdd22073d97e9c3f11637bdbd4763e2c8
You found a bug actually - the new system attempts to find a refund address (if one was not supplied) when the transaction changes from 0 to 1 confirmations, and because this transaction was sent from a multi-sig address, the system is unable to determine the refund address automatically (the bug).
Until I fix this problem, make sure to specify your refund address when you place the order :)
-
hi my transaction have been pending pass a 1 conformation , it's up to 4 conformation and it have not been completed user ptcgroup10009
https://blockchain.info/tx/613ca16645119e4873001e495cbbd26d97470b5b1bf7cf86457b65f7d38770a0
if a address is need for a refund here is one 3KmQ5baLYdeHmQhwV9XypHGiYu5MgewEPY
Sure, no problem, here is the refund:
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf8289c96a3ee5b115528196f01ac29bdd22073d97e9c3f11637bdbd4763e2c8
You found a bug actually - the new system attempts to find a refund address (if one was not supplied) when the transaction changes from 0 to 1 confirmations, and because this transaction was sent from a multi-sig address, the system is unable to determine the refund address automatically (the bug).
Until I fix this problem, make sure to specify your refund address when you place the order :)
Thanks , understood
-
Good job +5% :)
-
Suggestions:
Get rid of the up and down arrows to adjust quantity. It takes way too long incrementing by satoshi. Or have them adjust buy the least significant place entered. For example, if i enter "0.123" and click the up arrow it should adjust to "0.124" instead of "0.12300001.
Allow entering values on both sides of the equation and automatically adjust the side that was not changed. So you can figure out how much you need to send to get a specific amount of whatever back. Once the value is changed and the site is recalculating the other side, give a little swirly or something to show its busy calculating the new values.
-
Those are good ideas, thanks :)
-
Hi,
I came here from support tab at metaexchange site.
I sold 6 BitUSD for BTC hours ago and did not receive the BTC, the transaction is not even pending.
Could you please help me with this?
I put in my Cryptsy BTC address: 1J2MDpeBXuSPSDP9KcQ6p2bVTtnySUp7kk
I sent 6 BitUSD from my account (thelostboy) to liquidusd
Deposit memo is bitUSD_BTC-0-1J2MDpeBXuSPSDP9KcQ6p
And, yes, I pressed Submit several times, nothing happened though
-
Hi,
I came here from support tab at metaexchange site.
I sold 6 BitUSD for BTC hours ago and did not receive the BTC, the transaction is not even pending.
Could you please help me with this?
I put in my Cryptsy BTC address: 1J2MDpeBXuSPSDP9KcQ6p2bVTtnySUp7kk
I sent 6 BitUSD from my account (thelostboy) to liquidusd
Deposit memo is bitUSD_BTC-0-1J2MDpeBXuSPSDP9KcQ6p
And, yes, I pressed Submit several times, nothing happened though
Can you post the transaction ID - that will help us to identify the transaction?
-
Transaction #ee47f5eb
Block #2742587 , Transaction #0 , Next #0
TimeStamp: 06/07/2015 7:28 PM
Is this what you asked for?
-
Now it appears in my transactions at metaexchange with status completed (it was empty before), so I guess it's just a question of a few confirmations for the BTC to get there. Thanks a lot!
-
I see the 6 bitUSD that came in. I'll investigate the BTC to make sure it goes through.
-
It went through, thanks again for your support
-
I've made a couple of tweaks to the display of orderbook rows - now only displaying 8 significant digits instead of 8 decimal places, because it was getting hard to read.
Also, I've had to make account numbers inadmissible as receiving addresses, because the bitshares API cannot send to an account number, and this caused one outstanding failure to send funds.
-
Just added Relative Orders to metaexhange markets BTS/BTC and bitBTC/BTC!
Come check them out:
https://metaexchange.info/markets/BTS/BTC
-
The BTC/bitUSD/Silver/Gold pairs were offline due to the bitcoin wallet timing out. This has been resolved. Apologies for the inconvenience.
-
Metaexchange is going down for a site upgrade, eta 1 hour.
-
Ok, we're back
-
I've just added a NXT/BTC market to metaexchange. Let's hope we can bring our two blockchains a little closer together :)
-
to do a little "what is going on with metaexchange!"
we thank anyone for their support. Our goals are - make the exchange as trustfree as possible and to give the BitShares community a good exposure through metaexchange.info
at the moment we are doing many stuff, we will see in a couple of weeks. Not so much to say before it get out in the public.
- Right now, we are doing 3-5% of the daily BTS tradingvolume per day - we hope to get a higher market share in the future.
- bitUSD and BTS market are used often and bitGold, bitSilver not so much - bitCNY as much as nothing! - but we think with more people joining BitShares we will see more use of the pairs
- we added Nxt for a couple of days. Not only because we believe that Nxt will be traded on metaexchange, but we want to approach more and more communities to get them to use metaexchange. With the use of metaexchange we think some will take a look into BitShares as well.
- we have "relative, limit and quick" order but we are not sure if the function is well known, so if you think we should change something feel free to help us and give us feedback!
thank you for your time reading :D
-
to do a little "what is going on with metaexchange!"
we thank anyone for their support. Our goals are - make the exchange as trustfree as possible and to give the BitShares community a good exposure through metaexchange.info
at the moment we are doing many stuff, we will see in a couple of weeks. Not so much to say before it get out in the public.
- Right now, we are doing 3-5% of the daily BTS tradingvolume per day - we hope to get a higher market share in the future.
- bitUSD and BTS market are used often and bitGold, bitSilver not so much - bitCNY as much as nothing! - but we think with more people joining BitShares we will see more use of the pairs
- we added Nxt for a couple of days. Not only because we believe that Nxt will be traded on metaexchange, but we want to approach more and more communities to get them to use metaexchange. With the use of metaexchange we think some will take a look into BitShares as well.
- we have "relative, limit and quick" order but we are not sure if the function is well known, so if you think we should change something feel free to help us and give us feedback!
thank you for your time reading :D
Nicely done. +5%
-
Hi,
I have sent some bitcoins to buy BTS more than 2 hours ago. My order is still pending? It was a quick order so should have executed already.
What might be the problem?
thanks.
-
Hi,
I have sent some bitcoins to buy BTS more than 2 hours ago. My order is still pending? It was a quick order so should have executed already.
What might be the problem?
thanks.
maybe their client stucks .. </wildguess>
@monsterer any idea?
-
Could you pls Provide Transaktion ID . is maybe your Transaktion still unconfirmes ? Ceck it via blockchain.info
-
Could you pls Provide Transaktion ID . is maybe your Transaktion still unconfirmes ? Ceck it via blockchain.info
https://blockchain.info/tx/f97f0abae87ef4aebb565e77231ccd3ce9325eb3e0c6a39a583ae12b1802c2d2 (https://blockchain.info/tx/f97f0abae87ef4aebb565e77231ccd3ce9325eb3e0c6a39a583ae12b1802c2d2)
Yes you are right. But why is it not confirmed still? It has transaction fee, And it is included in a block. What makes it unconfirmed, I dont understand.
I guess I should have not send directly from an exchange :-[
-
Could you pls Provide Transaktion ID . is maybe your Transaktion still unconfirmes ? Ceck it via blockchain.info
https://blockchain.info/tx/f97f0abae87ef4aebb565e77231ccd3ce9325eb3e0c6a39a583ae12b1802c2d2 (https://blockchain.info/tx/f97f0abae87ef4aebb565e77231ccd3ce9325eb3e0c6a39a583ae12b1802c2d2)
Yes you are right. But why is it not confirmed still? It has transaction fee, And it is included in a block. What makes it unconfirmed, I dont understand.
I guess I should have not send directly from an exchange :-[
Bitcoin network under attack so wait 15-20 hours it's should be confirmed:
https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions
-
Hi,
I have sent some bitcoins to buy BTS more than 2 hours ago. My order is still pending? It was a quick order so should have executed already.
What might be the problem?
thanks.
Your transaction is pending because it doesn't yet have 1 confirmation:
https://blockchain.info/tx/f97f0abae87ef4aebb565e77231ccd3ce9325eb3e0c6a39a583ae12b1802c2d2
Thanks to the current bitcoin 'stress test', transactions with 'lower' fees are taking a lot longer to find their way into blocks.
It has a high priority, so it should be confirmed soon. Keep at eye on the link above :)
-
It has a high priority, so it should be confirmed soon. Keep at eye on the link above :)
not quite .. it tries to spend an input that is unconfirmed .. which again has an unconfirmed input ..
this may take some time even though it is stated with high-priority .. depending on the miner and when the last confirmed transactions went through
-
BItcoin is difficult right now! But, maybe it is good for BitShares :D
Everytime i have to use Bitcoin - it is just not as good, as it could be!
@lakerta06 i had the same problem for a couple of days. It was just a terrible expierience, i had to wait till the next day. So hopefully it will go fast for you.
-
BItcoin is difficult right now! But, maybe it is good for BitShares :D
Everytime i have to use Bitcoin - it is just not as good, as it could be!
@lakerta06 i had the same problem for a couple of days. It was just a terrible expierience, i had to wait till the next day. So hopefully it will go fast for you.
It confirmed and I got my BTS. Thanks everybody!
-
Just spotten a typo on the front page: https://metaexchange.info/
Fast transactions
Orders a processed as soon as they are confirmed, no need to deposit, trade and then withdraw.
-
thanks for the info, will inform monsterer
-
A Korean member is having failure status... can you check it?
The Bitcoin txid is https://blockchain.info/tx/06d64056a0bbc0f498ffa2358f9bf21b4d5a430c54a7112347450822cab41b69 (To 1GvxvnhKSLBrRhfSUxETM8mb6zCqa9c6ek )
-
Something went wrong with my relative order. It was matched partially earlier today and now shows a bugged out bid price:
http://i.imgur.com/nBBkICu.png
The price of my order was 0.00002095 before (100% of avg. of bid&ask).
-
Something went wrong with my relative order. It was matched partially earlier today and now shows a bugged out bid price:
http://i.imgur.com/nBBkICu.png
The price of my order was 0.00002095 before (100% of avg. of bid&ask).
Sorry about that - you found a bug, which I've just fixed :) Your order wasn't filled at that price, so I left it in place at the corrected (relative) price.
-
Something went wrong with my relative order. It was matched partially earlier today and now shows a bugged out bid price:
http://i.imgur.com/nBBkICu.png (http://i.imgur.com/nBBkICu.png)
The price of my order was 0.00002095 before (100% of avg. of bid&ask).
Which pair?
-
Hello everyone!
Just wanted to swing in and say thank u again for providing this awesome service! It's ultra convenient being able to send from coinbase to my BTS wallet while taking only a few minutes to complete the whole transaction (from coinbase log in to BTS wallet balance getting updated).
Keep up the great work!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hello everyone!
Just wanted to swing in and say thank u again for providing this awesome service! It's ultra convenient being able to send from coinbase to my BTS wallet while taking only a few minutes to complete the whole transaction (from coinbase log in to BTS wallet balance getting updated).
Keep up the great work!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thanks of using our service :D
if you have ideas how we can improve - let us know!
-
The "Amount" column of the "Your transactions" table does not display in which currency the amount is denominated. This is a bit confusing when you sometimes have BTS amounts (partialFill, completed rows) and sometimes BTC amounts (refunded rows).
http://imgur.com/txyxiZt
-
I also found another bug. To reproduce:
- Choose "Relative" Buy mode
- Reload the page - the mode automatically changes to "Quick" mode
- Try to submit the order - the error "Invalid parameter in relative" comes up
http://i.imgur.com/z8jo1o3.png
-
cheers AtomicBounce
Thanks for using us and double thanks for feedback and bugreporting :D
Helps us a lot!
We will think how we can improve the display of the transactions.
Have a nice day.
-
I miss having the transfer limit visible always, now I need to look for it by manually entering a large value.
Although with your increased limits its not as necessary I guess.
Really impressed with the service though, keeps getting better, I like how my orders pop up almost instantly with their status. Keep up the good work!
-
The "Amount" column of the "Your transactions" table does not display in which currency the amount is denominated. This is a bit confusing when you sometimes have BTS amounts (partialFill, completed rows) and sometimes BTC amounts (refunded rows).
http://imgur.com/txyxiZt
Yes, this is a good point - we should show the currency symbol as well. Thanks for the bug report - I'll get on it :)
-
Btw I think its better to show the buy limit clearly, without having to guess a limit in the BTC field first. Now that I typed "10" it appears in red underneath (Max 4.9), but why not show it automatically?
-
Btw I think its better to show the buy limit clearly, without having to guess a limit in the BTC field first. Now that I typed "10" it appears in red underneath (Max 4.9), but why not show it automatically?
Good idea - thanks for the suggestion!
-
I've placed a sell-limit order (BTS/BTC) with duration of 4 hours, but the order did not appear on frontend. Where can I receive support?
-
I've placed a sell-limit order (BTS/BTC) with duration of 4 hours, but the order did not appear on frontend. Where can I receive support?
hi,
and thanks for the info, i informed paul, he will look into it, but he is not near a computer, so give us some time!
-
I've placed a sell-limit order (BTS/BTC) with duration of 4 hours, but the order did not appear on frontend. Where can I receive support?
hi,
and thanks for the info, i informed paul, he will look into it, but he is not near a computer, so give us some time!
Thank you for your help. Please let me know if you need more info.
-
I've placed a sell-limit order (BTS/BTC) with duration of 4 hours, but the order did not appear on frontend. Where can I receive support?
hi,
and thanks for the info, i informed paul, he will look into it, but he is not near a computer, so give us some time!
Thank you for your help. Please let me know if you need more info.
It should have been expired by now, but I am not getting the refund, so it looks like it is completely stuck in your system.
-
You are right . my own transaction has the same Problem . i hope Monsterer can fix it as soon as possible . we need a little bit time . sorry for the inconveniece
-
You are right . my own transaction has the same Problem . i hope Monsterer can fix it as soon as possible . we need a little bit time . sorry for the inconveniece
Hi Shentist,
I just received a refund from the system. Thanks for escalating this problem to the devs.
-
You are right . my own transaction has the same Problem . i hope Monsterer can fix it as soon as possible . we need a little bit time . sorry for the inconveniece
Hi Shentist,
I just received a refund from the system. Thanks for escalating this problem to the devs.
thanks for the information!
At the moment the system is handling the problem on his own - something got wrong, so send it back!
Thanks for using metaexchange!
-
If you want to use BTS, NXT markets on metaexchange - pls, wait! Monsterer is away and can fix it tomorrow.
Something got out of sync. The bot will not make your transaction. It should send you the transaction back. otherwise you have to wait
until paul is back.
Sry, for the inconvience
-
False alarm. Everything is business as usual. :)
-
Hi,
I tried metaexchange to buy some BitUSD. I probably did something wrong because I never receive the BitUSD.
I wanted 0.89 BTC in BitUSD. I followed the steps and sent 0.89 BTC at the address metaexchange gave me.
(199UtRAfjtpRcbpZDcse9tK8PNvzfmBHaD)
It's been 4 hours and I still don't have them. I checked my wallet and I haven't been refunded either.
Here are the links provided by metaexchange to check the transaction (0.89 BTC) in the blockchain :
https://blockchain.info/tx/51d770b0ed587784a7f03a6b4a4100ef35323f682007f018658df4f97539a740 (https://blockchain.info/tx/51d770b0ed587784a7f03a6b4a4100ef35323f682007f018658df4f97539a740)
https://blockchain.info/tx/235e8dd3182e749d0a7f92b1dfd58c39888b8b3509e4e7370e02d817a401cc0c (https://blockchain.info/tx/235e8dd3182e749d0a7f92b1dfd58c39888b8b3509e4e7370e02d817a401cc0c)
A little help would be fantastic.
-
Hi,
I tried metaexchange to buy some BitUSD. I probably did something wrong because I never receive the BitUSD.
I wanted 0.89 BTC in BitUSD. I followed the steps and sent 0.89 BTC at the address metaexchange gave me.
(199UtRAfjtpRcbpZDcse9tK8PNvzfmBHaD)
It's been 4 hours and I still don't have them. I checked my wallet and I haven't been refunded either.
Here are the links provided by metaexchange to check the transaction (0.89 BTC) in the blockchain :
https://blockchain.info/tx/51d770b0ed587784a7f03a6b4a4100ef35323f682007f018658df4f97539a740 (https://blockchain.info/tx/51d770b0ed587784a7f03a6b4a4100ef35323f682007f018658df4f97539a740)
https://blockchain.info/tx/235e8dd3182e749d0a7f92b1dfd58c39888b8b3509e4e7370e02d817a401cc0c (https://blockchain.info/tx/235e8dd3182e749d0a7f92b1dfd58c39888b8b3509e4e7370e02d817a401cc0c)
A little help would be fantastic.
riverhead will look into it!
thanks for using metaexchange
-
I sorted it, no need ;)
-
Thanks guys.
The refund transaction ends up to another account on Poloniex.
They ask me for a "proof" that it's not a transfer I did voluntarily to this person.
Well, I'm not sure what kind of prove they want. I sent them a snapshot of my withdraw on Poloniex to metaexchange, both links of the incoming transaction transaction to metaexchange and the refunding one on the blockchain.
I hope it will be enough.
-
Thanks guys.
The refund transaction ends up to another account on Poloniex.
They ask me for a "proof" that it's not a transfer I did voluntarily to this person.
Well, I'm not sure what kind of prove they want. I sent them a snapshot of my withdraw on Poloniex to metaexchange, both links of the incoming transaction transaction to metaexchange and the refunding one on the blockchain.
I hope it will be enough.
Both the incoming and the outgoing transaction links should be enough for them to confirm what happened. Let us know if you have further problems :)
-
BTS/BTC is down right now because the wallet got stuck on a fork. All transactions will process once the chain resyncs - sorry about the delay :)
-
Thanks guys.
The refund transaction ends up to another account on Poloniex.
They ask me for a "proof" that it's not a transfer I did voluntarily to this person.
Well, I'm not sure what kind of prove they want. I sent them a snapshot of my withdraw on Poloniex to metaexchange, both links of the incoming transaction transaction to metaexchange and the refunding one on the blockchain.
I hope it will be enough.
Both the incoming and the outgoing transaction links should be enough for them to confirm what happened. Let us know if you have further problems :)
The problem seem to be solved. Poloniex sent me a mail, the person who received my refund agree to give it back and they will send it to me.
The Blockchain transaction was proof enough.
Sorry for the troubles and thank you again for the help ;)
-
The following markets are currently experiencing issues:
bitUSD/BTC
bitSILVER/BTC
bitGOLD/BTC
Please avoid using them until @riverhead confirms fully operational. Sorry for the downtime.
-
Metaexchange site and daemons will be down for about 1H for an upgrade.
-
Back up, and we've added Ether to our list of coins!
https://metaexchange.info/markets/ETH/BTC
-
Back up, and we've added Ether to our list of coins!
https://metaexchange.info/markets/ETH/BTC
Nice move!! +5% +5% +5%
-
Hi,
I did a mistake....i sent ETH from poloniex to metaexchange and did not include the Deposit Data.......
any chance to get my order credited? or just be refunded with the sent ETH? - but for this i guess i have to provide a ETH address i own, right?
EDIT: adding details...
BTC address 1H9e6k3gGSZzsRmgLANoQqJ1KmoPZocSdT
TX for ETH sent: https://etherchain.org/tx/0xa4ed61116731ee16d0a24e58323e1990a748cf6f98f39b27efcf26aba47689e5
ETH Deposit address in poloniex: 0x9799b868c884690465a1e50a97d76a8b107f7583
Order expiry was set to 1hour if i recall correctly. after order expires, will the ETH be sent to the address it came from?
i hope you can help me in one way or the other
-
Hi,
I did a mistake....i sent ETH from poloniex to metaexchange and did not include the Deposit Data.......
any chance to get my order credited? or just be refunded with the sent ETH? - but for this i guess i have to provide a ETH address i own, right?
EDIT: adding details...
BTC address 1H9e6k3gGSZzsRmgLANoQqJ1KmoPZocSdT
TX for ETH sent: https://etherchain.org/tx/0xa4ed61116731ee16d0a24e58323e1990a748cf6f98f39b27efcf26aba47689e5
ETH Deposit address in poloniex: 0x9799b868c884690465a1e50a97d76a8b107f7583
Order expiry was set to 1hour if i recall correctly. after order expires, will the ETH be sent to the address it came from?
i hope you can help me in one way or the other
we will look into it
thanks for using metaexchange
-
Hi,
I did a mistake....i sent ETH from poloniex to metaexchange and did not include the Deposit Data.......
any chance to get my order credited? or just be refunded with the sent ETH? - but for this i guess i have to provide a ETH address i own, right?
EDIT: adding details...
BTC address 1H9e6k3gGSZzsRmgLANoQqJ1KmoPZocSdT
TX for ETH sent: https://etherchain.org/tx/0xa4ed61116731ee16d0a24e58323e1990a748cf6f98f39b27efcf26aba47689e5
ETH Deposit address in poloniex: 0x9799b868c884690465a1e50a97d76a8b107f7583
Order expiry was set to 1hour if i recall correctly. after order expires, will the ETH be sent to the address it came from?
i hope you can help me in one way or the other
No problem, here you go: https://etherchain.org/tx/0x656c41fd7817a07405e554ccb58c7339c9fbf05e5aa0d3a3f806a3cef8bc7f1b
-
Hi,
I did a mistake....i sent ETH from poloniex to metaexchange and did not include the Deposit Data.......
any chance to get my order credited? or just be refunded with the sent ETH? - but for this i guess i have to provide a ETH address i own, right?
EDIT: adding details...
BTC address 1H9e6k3gGSZzsRmgLANoQqJ1KmoPZocSdT
TX for ETH sent: https://etherchain.org/tx/0xa4ed61116731ee16d0a24e58323e1990a748cf6f98f39b27efcf26aba47689e5
ETH Deposit address in poloniex: 0x9799b868c884690465a1e50a97d76a8b107f7583
Order expiry was set to 1hour if i recall correctly. after order expires, will the ETH be sent to the address it came from?
i hope you can help me in one way or the other
No problem, here you go: https://etherchain.org/tx/0x656c41fd7817a07405e554ccb58c7339c9fbf05e5aa0d3a3f806a3cef8bc7f1b
Thanks!
I'll contact poloniex now and ask them to send the ETH my account.
-
Hey metaexchange devs, please help! I submitted a buy order on ETH/BTC and it went through on my end, but the ETH was never sent...
Here's my BTC tx, currently at 10 confirmations:
https://blockchain.info/tx/bcfccd0d33d5be130e8a835ad74599806444f0069de4174e77a3c39d6ee3ac77
and here's the outbound ETH tx links it gave me (completed, and partialFill):
https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0x6ade741d538c63af7b5b7f64129385d1bc47b0693500e8d909e9f21aacbe80e1
https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0x2b067052b6c7fa7b7b4cc24cc33c4934f85174d567df101b7aee973998269415
https://www.etherchain.org/tx/0x9479d1f4d12cbf2063484749ef3ce412598238d77aaede346dad67960995b97e
As of yet, these ether transactions have not shown up on the blockchain. It didn't go through for some reason? Am I the first person this has happened to?
-
Very sorry about that - geth has some transaction reliability problems, for which I logged a bug on github:
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/issues/1662
I've refunded your BTC transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/5a5e835aab080fe461d06ec914e710ad5fdadb73507f16276d9d38ce1fdd7d13
-
Okay that makes sense, I figured it must've been a bug in the etherium client, since it returned a tx hash without actually making the tx. Good to know that the devs are aware of this and it looks like there's already a workaround... Anyway thank you for the fast response.
-
Update time!
Finally added a proper support request system to the main site - forcing people to sign up on this forum just to post a support request was highly inadequate!
Also corrected a bug in the API with case sensitive HTTP request headers causing incorrect API responses.
Added a workaround to the problem with geth missing transactions, so buy orders on ETH are now back up to full speed.
-
Update!
Site performance, UI tweak update. The site was very slow due to a couple of bugs and the polling nature of the initial design. Hopefully, the bugs have now been squished and I've migrated the site to server push instead of polling, which should reduce the number of HTTP requests the server had to service.
UI tweaks:
I've removed the auto form submit when you changed the receiving/refund address because the presence of the 'submit' button meant that people pushed submit only to have what appeared to be nothing happen since the form had already been submitted on blur. Now you have to press submit.
Changed the default display under the market quote to list the max recommended buy/sells sizes, which are row 1 of our orderbook.
Added a small title to the quotes to make it more obvious what they are.
Cheers, Paul.
-
I'm looking for an exchange where I can get a fixed bitcoin adr / BTS adr. Say I'm earning some bitcoin through ads, and want them to instantly convert to bts. "Set and forget" - is that planned?
-
I'm looking for an exchange where I can get a fixed bitcoin adr / BTS adr. Say I'm earning some bitcoin through ads, and want them to instantly convert to bts. "Set and forget" - is that planned?
You can do that right now - just enter you BTS address (and a valid bitcoin refund address from your own wallet) into https://metaexchange.info/markets/BTS/BTC, hit submit and the generated deposit address will be permanent.
Then, point your site at this address and it will automatically pay out BTS to your account whenever your site makes payment.
-
I'm looking for an exchange where I can get a fixed bitcoin adr / BTS adr. Say I'm earning some bitcoin through ads, and want them to instantly convert to bts. "Set and forget" - is that planned?
You can do that right now - just enter you BTS address (and a valid bitcoin refund address from your own wallet) into https://metaexchange.info/markets/BTS/BTC, hit submit and the generated deposit address will be permanent.
Then, point your site at this address and it will automatically pay out BTS to your account whenever your site makes payment.
awesome thanks!
-
I'm pleased to announce that our bitUSD market is back! Now with an upgraded node which supports limit orders!
https://metaexchange.info/markets/bitUSD/BTC
-
The intermittent 'Missing parameter' error when submitting support requests, or general forms on the site should now fixed.
-
Metaexchange supports the upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain. To facilitate the change over, our BTS markets will shut down in this order:
8th Oct: bitUSD/BTC
12th Oct: bitCNY/BTC
12th Oct: BTS/BTC
Please do not send any funds to these markets post these dates as they will not be processed.
Post 13th Oct, metaexchange will upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain and all our BTS markets will come back online, once the pegged assets are up and running in the 2.0 chain, which is likely to be on the 15th Oct.
Cheers, Paul.
-
@monsterer: could you take a look at http://docs.bitshares.eu/integration and tell me what's missing/unclear? that would be very helpful!
-
@monsterer: could you take a look at http://docs.bitshares.eu/integration and tell me what's missing/unclear? that would be very helpful!
Sure, I'm going through it now; I'll post in your thread :)
-
Metaexchange supports the upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain. To facilitate the change over, our BTS markets will shut down in this order:
8th Oct: bitUSD/BTC
12th Oct: bitCNY/BTC
12th Oct: BTS/BTC
Please do not send any funds to these markets post these dates as they will not be processed.
Post 13th Oct, metaexchange will upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain and all our BTS markets will come back online, once the pegged assets are up and running in the 2.0 chain, which is likely to be on the 15th Oct.
Cheers, Paul.
Any chance you could integrate with the test network?
-
Any chance you could integrate with the test network?
On it :)
-
Post 13th Oct, metaexchange will upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain and all our BTS markets will come back online, once the pegged assets are up and running in the 2.0 chain, which is likely to be on the 15th Oct.
Are you guys on schedule or have things changed?
-
Post 13th Oct, metaexchange will upgrade to the 2.0 blockchain and all our BTS markets will come back online, once the pegged assets are up and running in the 2.0 chain, which is likely to be on the 15th Oct.
Are you guys on schedule or have things changed?
Still working - the new API is a bit fiddly to work with, but we're getting there
-
if you follow this thread
- our BTS market is back
- we are doing at the moment a fundraiser you will find more infomation here : https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19523.0.html
-
Metaexchange service outage: ETA resume operations 1am GMT 16/11/2015
One of our ISPs has a service outage due to be resolved at 1am tomorrow morning, sorry for the inconvenience. Any orders placed now will be pending until that point.
-
We're back. Shortest outage ever. :)
-
I'm working to resolve a problem with a stalled coin wallet which is holding up transactions, thank you for your patience :)
-
Everything should now be resolved :)
-
@monsterer @Shentist
YOU GUYS ARE AWESOME!!
Trading BTC in for BTS is still cheapest with you guys and super easy.
Thank You for your awesome service and keep up the fantastic Customer Service! :)
-
Update: one of our coin wallets is resyncing, there will be a delay in service while this occurs.
-
Service should now be restored
-
I'm trying to buy small amount of Metafees on the METAFEES/ETH market.
I don't know how to include the deposit data for the transaction. I am trying to send ETH from Kraken but there isn't the option
to include any deposit data, only the deposit address.
-
I'm trying to buy small amount of Metafees on the METAFEES/ETH market.
I don't know how to include the deposit data for the transaction. I am trying to send ETH from Kraken but there isn't the option
to include any deposit data, only the deposit address.
Few exchanges support this feature, unfortunately. You'll probably need to use an intermediate wallet which allows you to specify the data field.
-
I'm trying to buy small amount of Metafees on the METAFEES/ETH market.
I don't know how to include the deposit data for the transaction. I am trying to send ETH from Kraken but there isn't the option
to include any deposit data, only the deposit address.
Few exchanges support this feature, unfortunately. You'll probably need to use an intermediate wallet which allows you to specify the data field.
I managed to buy some METAFEES using the etherium mist gui wallet. I'll propably buy more tonight. Are you guys ready with the bitcointalk announcement?
Is it coming tonight? :)
-
I'm trying to buy small amount of Metafees on the METAFEES/ETH market.
I don't know how to include the deposit data for the transaction. I am trying to send ETH from Kraken but there isn't the option
to include any deposit data, only the deposit address.
Few exchanges support this feature, unfortunately. You'll probably need to use an intermediate wallet which allows you to specify the data field.
I managed to buy some METAFEES using the etherium mist gui wallet. I'll propably buy more tonight. Are you guys ready with the bitcointalk announcement?
Is it coming tonight? :)
thanks for your support!
we will do the announcment after the first buyback on monday https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20150.msg259135/topicseen.html#msg259135 we want to show the whole process to not so familar communities. it is not forgotten and the fundraiser lasts 34 days.
-
testz just brought up (https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange) and it seems the library is for bts 0.9.3. How about putting up the library for bts2?
-
testz just brought up (https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange) and it seems the library is for bts 0.9.3. How about putting up the library for bts2?
I will try and see if I can separate it from the dependencies of metaexchange and get it up on github :)
-
I noticed there where MUSE/BTC trades made a little while back on the exchange I wonder why this market isn't active now.
When are you guys starting to promote the exhange on crypto forums?
Sorry for asking a lot of questions but I'm excited about this project and any updates are welcome. :)
-
MUSE/BTC is in the makings .. @Riverhead is running a liquidity bot for it and afaik is currently testing it .. Mabye he can give you an ETA
-
I noticed there where MUSE/BTC trades made a little while back on the exchange I wonder why this market isn't active now.
When are you guys starting to promote the exhange on crypto forums?
Sorry for asking a lot of questions but I'm excited about this project and any updates are welcome. :)
MUSE/BTC is technically ready. riverhead will run this market like before the bitUSD market, so it is his call when he feels comfortable to start it.
monsterer will make the ANNs as soon as he has time, if he can't i will do it on sunday. we wanted to let him do it, because his english is so much better :D
-
Just waiting to get some liquidity in place. Everything works perfectly thanks to @monsterer.
-
monsterer will make the ANNs as soon as he has time, if he can't i will do it on sunday. we wanted to let him do it, because his english is so much better :D
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1266571.0
:)
-
Metaexchange site was very slow couple hours ago and now I can't acces it.
Is there some maintanence or updates, what's the reason for this?
-
Metaexchange site was very slow couple hours ago and now I can't acces it.
Is there some maintanence or updates, what's the reason for this?
just a temporary problem from the hoster.
-
Metaexchange site was very slow couple hours ago and now I can't acces it.
Is there some maintanence or updates, what's the reason for this?
just a temporary problem from the hoster.
OK good to know. Site is working properly now.
-
What would be interesting but I don't know how/if possible is if I can buy ETH, NXT etc IOU from Metaexchange with BTS or bitbtc at least and not with NXT, ETH, BTC..
The idea is to use open ledger wallet for everything..I do not want to go buy i.e. NXT to an external exchange and then change that NXT for IOU NXT but I would like to have the option to buy your IOU.NXT with bts..Does it make sense?
-
i apologize if this has been answered already, but is metaexchange going to be offering a shapeshift-style lens/shifty/skeleton stuff soon?
thanx, ken
-
Metaexchange is currently experiencing a site outage; please bare with us while we resolve it.
-
Service restored :)
-
received 3k bts from metaexchangepartners. I know something was supposed to happen on the 25th if I'm not mistaken? But I thought funds would be used to buyback METAFEES on the market instead of handling out bts?
I'm fine either way, I would just like to understand this. Or it wasn't related at all?
-
received 3k bts from metaexchangepartners. I know something was supposed to happen on the 25th if I'm not mistaken? But I thought funds would be used to buyback METAFEES on the market instead of handling out bts?
I'm fine either way, I would just like to understand this. Or it wasn't related at all?
I would like an update on what is happening aswell
-
received 3k bts from metaexchangepartners. I know something was supposed to happen on the 25th if I'm not mistaken? But I thought funds would be used to buyback METAFEES on the market instead of handling out bts?
I'm fine either way, I would just like to understand this. Or it wasn't related at all?
I would like an update on what is happening aswell
@Akado this transaction is for the signature campaign https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17602.msg268112.html#msg268112
@all the METAFEES buyback will be done in a couple of days, maybe after the new year.
after the holidays are over we will discuss what happened on 25th but the loss is not as high as expected, because the community members transfered most of the funds back.
-
@Shentist
Surely we should be given the exact time of the buy back so we can all compete by offering different prices on the day of the buyback.
Also please state which market pair where the buy back will happen. Will it be METAEX.BTC:METAFEES like it was last time?
-
@Shentist
Surely we should be given the exact time of the buy back so we can all compete by offering different prices on the day of the buyback.
Also please state which market pair where the buy back will happen. Will it be METAEX.BTC:METAFEES like it was last time?
hi jonny,
we will do the next buyback on monday Janary 4th between 8pm - 9pm CET on this market again https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/market/METAFEES_METAEX.BTC
-
Hi,
I have a problem with an older order which, on my fault, did not execute. This happened on 11 September 2015.
I tried to sell 23.4 ETH but when i sent the ETH to metaexchange i did not fill in the deposit data.
Here is the tx id for the sent ETH:
https://etherchain.org/tx/0xcca62193f5fe5c0e2ece1a7bc82b6cc72014bf4fbf79569c392a52052e9872f0
The BTC address for the order was
1H9e6k3gGSZzsRmgLANoQqJ1KmoPZocSdT
My biggest problem of all is that i no longer have control over the address from which i sent the ETH as it was from ethereumwallet.org which around 22 September 2015 scammed everyone who had ETH in their online wallets. Luckily for me, i did not lose it to them.
I found that i filled a support ticket(#27 is the number of the support ticket) on the same day that i did the failed transfer but only got a generic reply that my ticket was received, and no other answer from that moment.
Is there any chance you could help me on this one?
Thanks in advance
LATER EDIT:
I also added another support ticket last night, number 163
FINAL EDIT:
Problem has been solved today by support (awesome Paul)
-
https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755
hughlang
5:48 PM I think there’s a scammy algorithm on metaexchange that gradually increases the buy price as you continue to send to the same ETH address. I had to send to 2 accounts this morning and I saw it start at one price and move up with each transaction.
5:48
As is, the bid-ask spread starts at 10% which is terrible.
5:49
Since i don’t have a choice, I guess I have to take it. I only have 1 BTC left to send, so I’m only going to get scammed for another 5%
-
https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755
hughlang
5:48 PM I think there’s a scammy algorithm on metaexchange that gradually increases the buy price as you continue to send to the same ETH address. I had to send to 2 accounts this morning and I saw it start at one price and move up with each transaction.
5:48
As is, the bid-ask spread starts at 10% which is terrible.
5:49
Since i don’t have a choice, I guess I have to take it. I only have 1 BTC left to send, so I’m only going to get scammed for another 5%
i don't get it! Does he claims he scams metaexchange?
-
https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755 (https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755)
hughlang
5:48 PM I think there’s a scammy algorithm on metaexchange that gradually increases the buy price as you continue to send to the same ETH address. I had to send to 2 accounts this morning and I saw it start at one price and move up with each transaction.
5:48
As is, the bid-ask spread starts at 10% which is terrible.
5:49
Since i don’t have a choice, I guess I have to take it. I only have 1 BTC left to send, so I’m only going to get scammed for another 5%
i don't get it! Does he claims he scams metaexchange?
No. He's saying that each time he sends the price gets worse - which is true because that's how the algorithm tries to balance the sides. It's not so much a scam than he doesn't understand bridge balancing.
-
https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755 (https://dgx-public.slack.com/archives/random/p1460393280000755)
hughlang
5:48 PM I think there’s a scammy algorithm on metaexchange that gradually increases the buy price as you continue to send to the same ETH address. I had to send to 2 accounts this morning and I saw it start at one price and move up with each transaction.
5:48
As is, the bid-ask spread starts at 10% which is terrible.
5:49
Since i don’t have a choice, I guess I have to take it. I only have 1 BTC left to send, so I’m only going to get scammed for another 5%
i don't get it! Does he claims he scams metaexchange?
No. He's saying that each time he sends the price gets worse - which is true because that's how the algorithm tries to balance the sides. It's not so much a scam than he doesn't understand bridge balancing.
so in a slack community i didn't know they are talking about metaexchange - nice :D
yeah, he don't get that we are balancing our portfolio so other people want to buy from us.
thanks, riverhead for the explanation.
-
Noticed that metaexchange is shutting down :( https://metaexchange.info/closing
-
It's a pity for closing the metaexchange.
could you open source it? I found the https://github.com/wildbunny/metaexchange, but it seem to out of date, it was compatible with bitshares 1.0?not bitshares 2.0?