BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => KeyID => Topic started by: toast on September 26, 2014, 05:42:11 pm
-
This is the thread I will point to if someone complains about having the wrong allocation after the fact!
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keyid/keyid/master/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keyid/keyid/2332af34f91677f8b489032a9fb5dd5de42719f3/libraries/blockchain/genesis_keyid.json
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/keyid/keyid/e2bb322fd63e44a58fcef4aa464ddaca557f1b55/libraries/blockchain/genesis_keyid.json
Note - keyhotee AGS was not honored! This allocation was announced *after* keyhotee donations ended, and the BTSX stake more than paid back for the donation. We don't owe them anything and honoring it is too much manual work. This stake is split proportionally to all other balances.
-
I will use these substitutions after I check signatures:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4748.0
-
I see numbers. What should I expect?
-
AGS * 1000
PTS * ~1176 (honestly not sure, never checked the supply on the PTS block: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Blocks/0000001418b7dbf283dc1e7454fafdafc8934ba8640c263ee77de92e5eca74ee )
+ a little extra from founder AGS
-
So something like 117600000000 * <My PTS at snapshot time> ?
-
So something like 117600000000 * <My PTS at snapshot time> ?
Yep, plus a little extra
-
Looks good for me.
-
Within 1.3% of expected; the error is an overage. Nice work, that's spread across about a half dozen or so addresses.
-
Something's not right with address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae
The same problem arose with Lottoshares here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977)
AGS Explorer shows 566.53948028 AGS
Your number for this address is 56596237510000
The numbers aren't THAT far out, but other addresses don't seem to have this problem.
I'm curious as to the cause of the discrepancy...
-
Looks about right when dividing what you provided in the github file by 117600000000. Nice job, can't wait!
-
Should be able to import private keys from btsx? I want to make sure I can import brian this time.
-
It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.
-
Besides, does the genesis allocation accounts for bounty?
-
Just want to clarify. The genesis block allocation contains both the AGS and PTS allocations.
So if I see the allocation associated with a PTS address in the json file, it is the sum of the allocation for AGS (donated from that same PTS address) plus the allocation to the same PTS (holdiing during snapshot), am I right?
Or it only accounts for AGS allocation?
-
Just want to clarify. The genesis block allocation contains both the AGS and PTS allocations.
So if I see the allocation associated with a PTS address in the json file, it is the sum of the allocation for AGS (donated from that same PTS address) plus the allocation to the same PTS (holdiing during snapshot), am I right?
Yes
-
Just want to clarify. The genesis block allocation contains both the AGS and PTS allocations.
So if I see the allocation associated with a PTS address in the json file, it is the sum of the allocation for AGS (donated from that same PTS address) plus the allocation to the same PTS (holdiing during snapshot), am I right?
assuming your have left some PTS in an address you also used to donate to AGS from .. then I would say so .. yes
those allocations should also be listed accordingly @ agsexplorer.com AFAIK
-
Just want to clarify. The genesis block allocation contains both the AGS and PTS allocations.
So if I see the allocation associated with a PTS address in the json file, it is the sum of the allocation for AGS (donated from that same PTS address) plus the allocation to the same PTS (holdiing during snapshot), am I right?
Yes
If that is the case, it seems to there is a discrepancy. I wrote a python to scan and sum all my PTS addressess in the genesis allocation. It is less than I expected. It seems to me it only accounts for AGS allocation. May be I missed something.
-
have you had a change in your pts position since the snapshot?
could you share the script?
-
Just want to clarify. The genesis block allocation contains both the AGS and PTS allocations.
So if I see the allocation associated with a PTS address in the json file, it is the sum of the allocation for AGS (donated from that same PTS address) plus the allocation to the same PTS (holdiing during snapshot), am I right?
Yes
If that is the case, it seems to there is a discrepancy. I wrote a python to scan and sum all my PTS addressess in the genesis allocation. It is less than I expected. It seems to me it only accounts for AGS allocation. May be I missed something.
Double check your AGS allocation with http://www1.agsexplorer.com
If your address in json has, as example 12345678901234 this mean you has 123.45678901234 AGS and http://www1.agsexplorer.com should show it.
If you has more for specific address, probably this address has AGS and PTS at snapshot.
-
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
-
have you had a change in your pts position since the snapshot?
could you share the script?
Here is the python code. You may need to install the required modules.
Just put the output of "listaddressgroupings" as a file in the same folder, e.g. "pts-listaddressgroupings.json"
and pass the name of the file containing the genesis block as command line option to the program.
#
# dns-alloc.py [genesis_json]
#
# This program intends to extract addresses from bitcoin-qt (or protoshares-qt) debug window command
# listaddressgrouppings. Then it looks up Bitshares DNS genesis block (allocation of DNS to AGS (PTS|BTC)
# and PTS. It lists the DNS allocation for each address and cumulate the sum.
# Save your listaddressgroupings to a file like "pts-listaddressgroupings.json". The program will
# scans all matched .json file. The genesis json is input as the command line option.
#
# ffwong
import sys
import json
from sys import exit
from pprint import pprint
import glob
def recur_addr(alist, btclist):
for i in range(0,len(alist)):
if isinstance(alist, list):
recur_addr(alist, btclist)
elif isinstance(alist, str) and len(alist)>30 and (alist[0]=='1' or alist[0]=='P'):
#pprint (alist)
btclist.append(alist)
###### main ######
scaleup = 1 # DNS scale up factor (if any)
wallets = glob.glob('*-listaddressgroupings.json')
filecnt = len(wallets)
genesis_json = open(sys.argv[1]) # change the filename is file changed
genesis_dict = json.load(genesis_json)
genesis = genesis_dict['balances'] # list of list
for i in range (0, filecnt):
jfilename = wallets
# Load json text file and extract all addresses recursively
json_data = open(jfilename)
addrlist = json.load(json_data)
btclist = []
recur_addr(addrlist,btclist)
json_data.close()
addrcnt = len(btclist)
allocnt = len(genesis)
start = 0
dns_sum = 0
for i in range(0, addrcnt): # for each address, look up the genesis block
allocation = 0
for j in range(0, allocnt):
if genesis[j][0] == btclist:
allocation = genesis[j][1]
msg = '%40s: %16.8f DNS' % (genesis[j][0], allocation/100000000*scaleup)
print (msg)
break
dns_sum += allocation
msg = ('Wallet %18s: [address count: %3d] [amount: %16.8f DNS]' % \
(jfilename.replace('-listaddressgroupings.json',''), len(btclist), dns_sum/100000000*scaleup))
pprint (msg) # convert satoshi -> DNS
-
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
Yes, I met this bug or typo as I run my python script as well, you need to manually fix it.
-
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
Yes, I met this bug or typo as I run my python script as well, you need to manually fix it.
and toast should fix it too .. however .. no idea if I am supposed to just add them up!?
-
have you had a change in your pts position since the snapshot?
@xeroc, you are right, I did move my coin to a new wallet right before the snapshot. And I forgot to scan that new wallet addresses. Now, after including that listaddressgroupings from this new wallet. The sum is correct. I can confirm (at least my allocation) that the genesis block allocation contains AGS (both from BTC and PTS donations) and PTS (during snapshot time) allocation. Thanks. ;)
-
Just wanted to run the script of
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9283.0
on the genesis block but couldn't find the total supply (at launch) to make the numbers right!?
is the supply announced? I just know about the distribution :(
-
my numbers seem to be off? It seems to show i have only 151 pts/ags but i was supposed to have some more?
-
Just wanted to run the script of
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9283.0
on the genesis block but couldn't find the total supply (at launch) to make the numbers right!?
is the supply announced? I just know about the distribution :(
Initial supply is 5bn.
-
Just wanted to run the script of
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9283.0
on the genesis block but couldn't find the total supply (at launch) to make the numbers right!?
is the supply announced? I just know about the distribution :(
Initial supply is 5bn.
I think genesis block will add up to something below 5bn because keyhotee is excluded so your balance will be scaled up.
I think I better just allocate keyhotee AGS to a key and then burn it on launch so that there isn't this small scaling.
-
Something's not right with address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae
The same problem arose with Lottoshares here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977)
AGS Explorer shows 566.53948028 AGS
Your number for this address is 56596237510000
The numbers aren't THAT far out, but other addresses don't seem to have this problem.
I'm curious as to the cause of the discrepancy...
Is it bad form to quote myself? Dunno...
Anyway, is there an explanation for the discrepancy for address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae?
The figures on AGSexplorer don't seem to match those reported for the genesis blocks.
It's happened with LottoShares and DNS. Will it occur with all DACs? It bothers me because I don't understand it...
-
Sounds like a bounty.. Who wants to recreate the snapshot?
There are several DACs coming up soon, I feel like we at least need an "official" AGS distribution
-
It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.
I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json
All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
-
I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json
All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.
By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is 6,177,308,745.22691250
By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.
It may not be equivalent to the total supply.
-
It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.
On the balance page, there's a link to toggle "merged/separate" view on the right hand side of the look up address. By default, merged view is displayed, you can switch to separate view for your purpose.
Sample link:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/xxxxxx?view=seperate
-
It seems agsexplorer only show the total AGS of all related PTS addresses, instead of individual address.
It is a bit difficult to double check with the DNS allocation.
On the balance page, there's a link to toggle "merged/separate" view on the right hand side of the look up address. By default, merged view is displayed, you can switch to separate view for your purpose.
Sample link:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/xxxxxx?view=seperate
Thanks. This is useful.
-
I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json
All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.
By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is 6,177,308,745.22691250
By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.
It may not be equivalent to the total supply.
toast used this website (http://ptsags.quisquis.de/ ) to generate the genesis file, and the total sum should equal to 5,000,000,000 including dev fund.
" 47092115" belongs to ["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115] which is just beside ["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757],
-
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7251.msg99579#msg99579
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 5000000000.0 available: 5,000,000,000.00000000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 10 addresses collective percentage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 1 addresses collectively own 273,379,229 DNS ( 5.47%)
top 2 addresses collectively own 473,379,229 DNS ( 9.47%)
top 3 addresses collectively own 673,379,229 DNS ( 13.47%)
top 4 addresses collectively own 873,379,229 DNS ( 17.47%)
top 5 addresses collectively own 1,073,379,229 DNS ( 21.47%)
top 6 addresses collectively own 1,273,379,229 DNS ( 25.47%)
top 7 addresses collectively own 1,424,191,726 DNS ( 28.48%)
top 8 addresses collectively own 1,486,052,280 DNS ( 29.72%)
top 9 addresses collectively own 1,544,917,424 DNS ( 30.90%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 10 addresses individual percentage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
top 1 addresse individually owns 273,379,229 DNS ( 5.47%)
top 2 addresse individually owns 200,000,000 DNS ( 4.00%)
top 3 addresse individually owns 200,000,000 DNS ( 4.00%)
top 4 addresse individually owns 200,000,000 DNS ( 4.00%)
top 5 addresse individually owns 200,000,000 DNS ( 4.00%)
top 6 addresse individually owns 200,000,000 DNS ( 4.00%)
top 7 addresse individually owns 150,812,498 DNS ( 3.02%)
top 8 addresse individually owns 61,860,554 DNS ( 1.24%)
top 9 addresse individually owns 58,865,144 DNS ( 1.18%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
address/amount distribution
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
address with > 10 DNS: 46,242
address with > 30 DNS: 39,099
address with > 50 DNS: 37,093
address with > 70 DNS: 35,734
address with > 90 DNS: 34,789
address with > 100 DNS: 34,194
address with > 300 DNS: 28,921
address with > 500 DNS: 27,182
address with > 700 DNS: 25,994
address with > 900 DNS: 25,141
address with > 1,000 DNS: 24,771
address with > 3,000 DNS: 17,651
address with > 5,000 DNS: 15,408
address with > 7,000 DNS: 14,143
address with > 9,000 DNS: 13,263
address with > 10,000 DNS: 12,894
address with > 30,000 DNS: 9,086
address with > 50,000 DNS: 6,448
address with > 70,000 DNS: 5,221
address with > 90,000 DNS: 4,580
address with > 100,000 DNS: 4,304
address with > 300,000 DNS: 1,929
address with > 500,000 DNS: 1,287
address with > 700,000 DNS: 908
address with > 900,000 DNS: 710
address with > 1,000,000 DNS: 627
address with > 3,000,000 DNS: 143
address with > 5,000,000 DNS: 96
address with > 7,000,000 DNS: 71
address with > 9,000,000 DNS: 60
address with > 10,000,000 DNS: 45
address with > 30,000,000 DNS: 12
address with > 50,000,000 DNS: 12
address with > 70,000,000 DNS: 7
address with > 90,000,000 DNS: 7
address with > 100,000,000 DNS: 7
(http://i.imgur.com/RkAXm3z.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/FTIPaE8.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/9ofOlie.png)
python3 script
https://github.com/xeroc/pytshares/blob/master/genesisStats.py
-
I have modified the orginal bitbalance to check the DNS allocation. It seems to be fine with a mixture of BTC, PTS AGS donation and very small amount of PTS.
http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/
-
I have 2 BTC addresses, and 5 PTS addresses all with only AGS allocations. After taking the quoted annoyance with AGSExplorer into account, all 7 of my addresses are exactly represented (modulo rounding errors) as ( 100,000,000,000 * AGSExplorer_value ) in this commit's genesis block: https://github.com/keyid/keyid/blob/805949683d21dd4d02a1e8e109929411611f1844/libraries/blockchain/genesis.json
All of these checks are meaningless, however, until somebody sums all of the balances in the file and verifies the total supply, and also until the file is verified to be well-formed JSON; see e.g.:
Hug?
235800 [
235801 "PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
235802 1177308757
235803 47092115
235804 ],
The typo above seems to be the only place with error in the json file.
By simply concatenating the digits at the above error and modifying my script to sum up the total in the genesis block json, total sum of allocation is 6,177,308,745.22691250
By removing the first line of digits and keeping only the second line of digits at the above error, I got the total sum of allocation: 4,999,999,988.22691250. This seems to be more correct.
It may not be equivalent to the total supply.
toast used this website (http://ptsags.quisquis.de/ ) to generate the genesis file, and the total sum should equal to 5,000,000,000 including dev fund.
" 47092115" belongs to ["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115] which is just beside ["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757],
are you saying there should be both of them like this:
["PmmFHqcApEPqibJEzqvvBhduEaDwgn7LFQ",47092115],
["PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",1177308757]
Instead of
[
"PuTHy9uGtdHdJ9ch1kTtrLkGkTuHe7HwSR",
1177308757
47092115
],
?
-
Thanks vikram and clar, I fixed that mistake and now the total is exactly 500000000000000000
-
I'm in. So nice feeling!
"PmJwbQBFssGK1yd1GLQb8hHswzyRkqqNzB",
8689302181000
-
I dont' really understand this post. Is this json on githubusercontent containing the future coin distribution for the DNS project?
I own AGS and PTS, my AGS balance is here:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/152nRpBkqiFpa6YTG63Z4AnjUfM9y9jCwx
I own 1338.6988 PTS, i bought these before 15 july 2014.
Should i be in that list?
If so, which address should i use to look in the list if i am there?
Regards, DJ
-
I got a problem that all my 'recieve addresses' have 189.3689 PTS checked by coinplorer.com.
but actually my wallet balance is 339.96378357 PTS right now and at the snapshop date.
so which number should I expect?
117600000000 * 189.3689
or
117600000000 * 339.96378357
thank you
-
ahh, i got it
both are in there, thanks
I dont' really understand this post. Is this json on githubusercontent containing the future coin distribution for the DNS project?
I own AGS and PTS, my AGS balance is here:
http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/152nRpBkqiFpa6YTG63Z4AnjUfM9y9jCwx
I own 1338.6988 PTS, i bought these before 15 july 2014.
Should i be in that list?
If so, which address should i use to look in the list if i am there?
Regards, DJ
-
I got a problem that all my 'recieve addresses' have 189.3689 PTS checked by coinplorer.com.
but actually my wallet balance is 339.96378357 PTS right now and at the snapshop date.
so which number should I expect?
117600000000 * 189.3689
or
117600000000 * 339.96378357
thank you
PM all relevant addresses and I'll check it out
-
I have 2094 ags ,but I just got 47140785664320 DNS. (Pe4o564GFQNqDHXvWVjkspZzCpXaWPYpkR) Could you help me check it ?
-
I got a problem that all my 'recieve addresses' have 189.3689 PTS checked by coinplorer.com.
but actually my wallet balance is 339.96378357 PTS right now and at the snapshop date.
so which number should I expect?
117600000000 * 189.3689
or
117600000000 * 339.96378357
thank you
PM all relevant addresses and I'll check it out
Looks like this was a change address issue
-
I have 2094 ags ,but I just got 47140785664320 DNS. (Pe4o564GFQNqDHXvWVjkspZzCpXaWPYpkR) Could you help me check it ?
I looked at the listaddressgroupings you sent and all the keys are there. Your balance is 2094402.1839 DNS
-
If the genesis supply is 5 Billion then AGS accounts for 1 Billion (or 20%). Does this mean AGS/PTS is already pre-diluted according to the *Final, guaranteed allocation* thread?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6753.msg89570#msg89570
-
If the genesis supply is 5 Billion then AGS accounts for 1 Billion (or 20%). Does this mean AGS/PTS is already pre-diluted according to the *Final, guaranteed allocation* thread?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6753.msg89570#msg89570
AGS gets 2 billion or 40% of the initial allocation (at least 20% of theoretical possible max 10bn)
-
If the genesis supply is 5 Billion then AGS accounts for 1 Billion (or 20%). Does this mean AGS/PTS is already pre-diluted according to the *Final, guaranteed allocation* thread?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6753.msg89570#msg89570
AGS gets 2 billion or 40% of the initial allocation (at least 20% of theoretical possible max 10bn)
That's what I thought. Then I think we have a problem with the genesis file.
I scaled the genesis_keyid.json by 1e-8 (which gives me a total supply of 5 billion)
I checked one of my AGS addresses and it was essentially scaling the AGS balance by 1000 (i.e. from a total of 1 Million AGS to 1 Billion DNS)
This means that AGS is only 20% of the total genesis supply.
(Can someone else verify with their AGS addresses?)
-
If the genesis supply is 5 Billion then AGS accounts for 1 Billion (or 20%). Does this mean AGS/PTS is already pre-diluted according to the *Final, guaranteed allocation* thread?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6753.msg89570#msg89570
AGS gets 2 billion or 40% of the initial allocation (at least 20% of theoretical possible max 10bn)
That's what I thought. Then I think we have a problem with the genesis file.
I scaled the genesis_keyid.json by 1e-8 (which gives me a total supply of 5 billion)
I checked one of my AGS addresses and it was essentially scaling the AGS balance by 1000 (i.e. from a total of 1 Million AGS to 1 Billion DNS)
This means that AGS is only 20% of the total genesis supply.
(Can someone else verify with their AGS addresses?)
There's 2 million AGS total. So 2mn * 1k = 2bn, or 40% of the initial supply.
-
If the genesis supply is 5 Billion then AGS accounts for 1 Billion (or 20%). Does this mean AGS/PTS is already pre-diluted according to the *Final, guaranteed allocation* thread?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6753.msg89570#msg89570
AGS gets 2 billion or 40% of the initial allocation (at least 20% of theoretical possible max 10bn)
That's what I thought. Then I think we have a problem with the genesis file.
I scaled the genesis_keyid.json by 1e-8 (which gives me a total supply of 5 billion)
I checked one of my AGS addresses and it was essentially scaling the AGS balance by 1000 (i.e. from a total of 1 Million AGS to 1 Billion DNS)
This means that AGS is only 20% of the total genesis supply.
(Can someone else verify with their AGS addresses?)
There's 2 million AGS total. So 2mn * 1k = 2bn, or 40% of the initial supply.
Thanks, forgot there was 1 million AGS for PTS donations and 1 million AGS for BTC donations.
-
Hello, there were about 307 PTS in this address "PXxj9SJYTQyBMbbQYwYjyhwA1igya8XsDy" before Aug 21, but it only received 245089 DNS.
Could you help me? Thank you.
-
Hello, there are about 307 PTS in this address "PXxj9SJYTQyBMbbQYwYjyhwA1igya8XsDy" before Aug 21, but it only received 245089 DNS.
Could you help me? Thank you.
Type "listaddressgroupings" in the console (help -> debug window) and paste the results here: http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/
-
Hello, there are about 307 PTS in this address "PXxj9SJYTQyBMbbQYwYjyhwA1igya8XsDy" before Aug 21, but it only received 245089 DNS.
Could you help me? Thank you.
Type "listaddressgroupings" in the console (help -> debug window) and paste the results here: http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/
I forgot other addresses :-[ . I'm so sorry and thanks a lot.
-
I got a problem that all my 'recieve addresses' have 189.3689 PTS checked by coinplorer.com.
but actually my wallet balance is 339.96378357 PTS right now and at the snapshop date.
so which number should I expect?
117600000000 * 189.3689
or
117600000000 * 339.96378357
thank you
PM all relevant addresses and I'll check it out
I found the rest addresses, thank you very much!
-
As listed in http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/, the amounts of DNS are correct for my pts/btc wallets. +5%
-
hy everyone!
i'm trying to check my balance on http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/.
I'm not able to check with my PTS address.
on the bottom text box i read "PTS - List address groupings" but in the example i read "angel Share.
Example: [ [ "PaNGELA9axAjyAabZi79NftqLi7Duvt9jX", 0, "Angel shares" ], ] ]
what is the correct sintax to submit?
thanks!
-
hy everyone!
i'm trying to check my balance on http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net/.
I'm not able to check with my PTS address.
on the bottom text box i read "PTS - List address groupings" but in the example i read "angel Share.
Example: [ [ "PaNGELA9axAjyAabZi79NftqLi7Duvt9jX", 0, "Angel shares" ], ] ]
what is the correct sintax to submit?
thanks!
you open up your bitshares-PTS wallet .. go to the debug window and type "listaddressgroupings" .. the returning lines you can paste into the SECOND input form of the webpage ... tada ...
-
PjsRLuzoci2NqPwfT748raPTvYxJ2EG93x AGS ：126.13827015
DNS; 11566056434000
-
Check this please:
PigwTMuqg8CknH6qFu6mymiSECwKQ6ZTJx 61.33245366 AGS, DNS 0
PmWQYMb9NyfEpRRXKNp9YmzrMB1cKZyrGn 63.05502769 AGS, DNS 0
Pd2HjeZ4WkMbu9fqiyhk3pjrf6HMGpgLqN 61.33245366 AGS, DNS 0
Pe4kbST4aivJ6q78sayJvhx8kxrzKnRrN4 61.93773607 AGS, DNS 0
thanks.
-
:'( :'( OMG it there any tools to check the balance easily?
-
:'( :'( OMG it there any tools to check the balance easily?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9380.msg123880#msg123880
-
PjsRLuzoci2NqPwfT748raPTvYxJ2EG93x AGS ：126.13827015
DNS; 11566056434000
Click "separate view" on AGS explorer to see breakdown by address. You have another key related to this with the rest.
Check this please:
PigwTMuqg8CknH6qFu6mymiSECwKQ6ZTJx 61.33245366 AGS, DNS 0
PmWQYMb9NyfEpRRXKNp9YmzrMB1cKZyrGn 63.05502769 AGS, DNS 0
Pd2HjeZ4WkMbu9fqiyhk3pjrf6HMGpgLqN 61.33245366 AGS, DNS 0
Pe4kbST4aivJ6q78sayJvhx8kxrzKnRrN4 61.93773607 AGS, DNS 0
thanks.
AGSexplorer says the first one's AGS is credited here: http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/PigwTMuqg8CknH6qFu6mymiSECwKQ6ZTJx?view=merged
This address is present with the correct amount for your first one: PkgT89Z3o9oMf2FuyFaqhwW2QHhDeHFxVv
[
"PkgT89Z3o9oMf2FuyFaqhwW2QHhDeHFxVv",
6133245366000
],
I think you have AGS in different addresses than you think. Check your change addresses.
-
:'( :'( OMG it there any tools to check the balance easily?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9380.msg123880#msg123880
+5% +5% awesome tools
-
I know i' m not in the right thread but
Theare similar tool for bitshare VOTE?
Thanks!
-
@toast, I am sure that you forgot to replace wrong PTS address with these substitutions:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4748.15
thank BM for your confirmation! thank god that PTS exchange trader has given me the signature for my local PTS address.
Address: PikAq7jB7yHJnZ8gsBXFLWquD1bPoeP7x5
Message: New PTS Address is PjjYtWpwmwEMA1MK9mjpDpSYzkTMPgjm7X
Signature: IEe5mmZs9q9kjhYVmhqW3RYvPJ8kbe9q3HqwL8hX9FoCN0XxzHPo3t1Fb1Lput/SQ1UaNwxSKzO7K9fjJ6yUVdw=
could you check the message signature then update the genesis blcok with my replaced PTS in the next DNS version?
I will use these substitutions after I check signatures:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4748.0
-
*Sorry if this is the wrong place, but it looks like the right place to bring this up.
I donated to AGS via Multibit wallet in April.
I confirmed my address and amount at http://bitshares.org/dns_genesis_ags_pts.txt - http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances and http://bitbalance.azurewebsites.net.
However, when I try to import my wallet/keys into KeyID from Multibit, it says all went fine, but no DNS are added and it should be around 25,720 according to all three websites.
Also note that the message displayed says, "Keys from Bitcoin/PTS wallet were successfully imported", despite selecting Multibit.
Edit : I'm only having problems with the Multibit import for my AGS purchase via bitcoin. My PTS wallet imported without issues.
-
By the way, I believe the problem I mentioned on page 2 of this topic is resolved by this (thanks pc) https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9760.msg126795#msg126795 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9760.msg126795#msg126795)
Toast said:
Sounds like a bounty.. Who wants to recreate the snapshot?
There are several DACs coming up soon, I feel like we at least need an "official" AGS distribution
Referring to:
Something's not right with address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae
The same problem arose with Lottoshares here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977 (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4879.msg64977#msg64977)
AGS Explorer shows 566.53948028 AGS
Your number for this address is 56596237510000
The numbers aren't THAT far out, but other addresses don't seem to have this problem.
I'm curious as to the cause of the discrepancy...
Is it bad form to quote myself? Dunno...
Anyway, is there an explanation for the discrepancy for address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae?
The figures on AGSexplorer don't seem to match those reported for the genesis blocks.
It's happened with LottoShares and DNS. Will it occur with all DACs? It bothers me because I don't understand it...
-
I'm assuming this is time sensitive (from the title) so I'm going to bump this ... http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/1kBDPTUphPdpYrbyw9pVs4i6EzsTPfJk4 (http://www1.agsexplorer.com/balances/1kBDPTUphPdpYrbyw9pVs4i6EzsTPfJk4)
I did not receive the 25,720.xxx DNS from this AGS donation via Bitcoin from a Multibit wallet. See above for more details.
-
Locking this because the DAC has launched already.
If your problem isn't addressed by this fix, it means you're probably not importing your keys properly: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9760.msg126795#msg126795