Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mich431

Pages: [1] 2
1
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum - better than Bitshares?
« on: January 18, 2014, 09:58:17 pm »
NXT, Ethereum, BitShares X, Mastercoin, and Colored Coins all solve different problems. 

When they launch in April they will have a basic blockchain and would still have to implement all of the other infrastructure on top of it.

Should be interesting to see what kind of fundraising model they opt for.

tho its not easy to draw lines here i still wouldnt compare NXT with Bitshares for an example...
but if ethererum is successful as a protocol, it is probably easier to replicate the idea of bitshares ontop of it

2
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum - better than Bitshares?
« on: January 18, 2014, 09:32:01 pm »
good point... they dont say whats happening in 6 days (fixed in starting post) ... tho sucha countdown refering to a revelution implied to me its about launching it...

3
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum - better than Bitshares?
« on: January 18, 2014, 09:27:16 pm »
there is a reason for your thread beeing posted in the development section of this forum and mine beeing here...
btw. Why are you rude if your sorry for it?

4
General Discussion / Ethereum - better than Bitshares?
« on: January 18, 2014, 09:20:14 pm »
Hi all,

Ethereum (often considered a Bitshares alternative) is about to start something in 6 days / 25.1.2014... (see countdown at Main site: http://ethereum.org/ )
Do you think its better than bitshares? Why yes, why no?
Is it better to invest 100% in Ethereum instead of indirectly investing 1:10 (PTS share of bitshares is 10% only)
into bitshares right now? Can bitshares outperform ethereum by factor 10?
Really thinking about it where to invest and its a tough decision.. so whats your oppinion on that and why?


Whitepaper: http://vbuterin.com/ethereum.html
Forums: http://forum.ethereum.org/

Mich431

5
General Discussion / Re: Is it like you don't care about PTS?
« on: January 17, 2014, 02:24:09 pm »
hmm good point :)

6
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU mining on AMD hardware
« on: January 17, 2014, 10:22:35 am »
thanks alot for your support :)

7
instead of multiple threads you can also start multiple processes of the miner (incase you have problems with threads)

check how much MB Ram your vserver has and ensure that Threadcount*ram used per thread does not exceed your total ram (leave some ram unused for the OS) - if you violate that -> "killed"

to not leave putty on use the Scren application:

screen -S "name" opens a new screen (like a new browser tab)
then start your process and you can exit putty now
when come back use screen -r and your back where you have been

some miners have stats that are hard to understand as a beginner... you have to mine for a couple of hours or a full day (until some blocks are found) inorder to see how good your doing roughly - use the pool stats for this

there are tons of mining calculators out there, not sure if they work for PTS - but to use them you need a better understanding of what your doing and some stats (at least c/m or cpm)
i also rented 2 vservers - after testings my rough estimates are that i get 10% back of what i invested - especially when GPU mining of PTS is going now this value should even decrease
so if the servers arent free for you, you should just give it up ;)

cheers

8
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source OpenCL GPU miner by girino
« on: January 16, 2014, 11:15:26 pm »
correction: after half an hour it also crashed with "gpuv3" mode with the following output:

[WORKER] collision found: 29176733 <-> 34093243 #116120 @ 1389914984 by 2
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2014-Jan-16 15:12:27 | 2152.4 c/m | 33.2 sh/m | VL: 1788 (99.8%), RJ: 4 (0.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
ERROR: -4, CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE, if there is a failure to allocate memory for buffer object.
assertion "_MY_ERR_X == CL_SUCCESS" failed: file "OpenCLObjects.cpp", line 427, function: _cl_event* OpenCLCommandQueue::enqueueKernel1D(OpenCLKernel*, size_t, size_t, _cl_event**, size_t)
Aborted

9
thanks for the giveaway :)

send the free pts to
PncyaH6RMD3FtpmBD1indxtu7kqH8AfpPE
please :)

thx alot

10
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source OpenCL GPU miner by girino
« on: January 16, 2014, 10:43:43 pm »
ok some updates:

on the mining hardware (with 3 graphic chips) using the following command

 ./ptsminer -u <ptsadress> -t 3 -m 28 -o ptsmine.beeeeer.org -q 1337 -a gpuv4

it starts working but then crahes after some minutes - see screenshot:



using -a gpuv3 it works like a charm - starting at low c/m but then rising up

on my notebook with 512mb vram graphics i get the following output (identical behavior with "-a gpu"):

$ ./ptsminer -u <pts id> -t 1 -m 26 -o ptsmine.beeeeer.org -q 1337 -a gpuv3
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** performance improvements by girino
***    if you like, donate:
***    PTS: PkyeQNn1yGV5psGeZ4sDu6nz2vWHTujf4h
***    BTC: 1GiRiNoKznfGbt8bkU1Ley85TgVV7ZTXce
*** thanks to wjchen for SSE4 improvements.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using GPU
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 54.201.26.128:1337
[MASTER] work received - sharetarget: 03ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbeefde4d
[STATS] 2014-Jan-16 23:41:43 | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
Platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
  Device: ATI RV710
  Device: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     U9400  @ 1.40GHz
Starting OpenCLMomentum V3
Device: ATI RV710
Max work group size: 128
ERROR: -48, CL_INVALID_KERNEL, if kernel is not a valid kernel object.
assertion "_MY_ERR_X == CL_SUCCESS" failed: file "OpenCLObjects.cpp", line 456, function: size_t OpenCLKernel::getWorkGroupSize(OpenCLDevice*)
Aborted


11
Deutsch (German) / Re: Wann kommen die Bitshares?
« on: January 16, 2014, 04:36:46 pm »
gut für neulinge ;)

12
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source OpenCL GPU miner by girino
« on: January 16, 2014, 04:27:48 pm »
i see ..
tho same problem using this:

 ./ptsminer -u x.x -p x -t 1 -m 28 -o http://ptsmine.beeeeer -q 1337 -a gpu

:)

13
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU mining on AMD hardware
« on: January 16, 2014, 04:25:52 pm »
its an intel core2duo 1,4 ghz on my notebook and an amd sempron 145 processor 2,8 ghz on the mining hardware - both having the same behavior -> sure its the cpu?

14
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU mining on AMD hardware
« on: January 16, 2014, 03:55:48 pm »
i used different parameters all resulting in the same behavior:

crash after the line of: will mine 15 round after 500 to support developer

used with platform id 0 and device id 0 ... also used the cmd version directly without the parameters of platform and device.. etc etc i tryed alot ... all the same (-> does not seem to depend on the parameters)

and no exeption is printed - it just hangs and windows informs me that the program stopped working

15
BitShares PTS / Re: Open source OpenCL GPU miner by girino
« on: January 16, 2014, 03:51:23 pm »
@ archit: your miner is also crashing on 2gb VRam... so the problem is not fixed to that... even tho a version that requires less vram would be awesome

@ girino:

it wont help you much more than what i already noted, but here you go (partial german output):

$ ./ptsminer -u x.x -p x -t 1 -m 28 -a gpu -o http://ypool.net -q 10034
********************************************
*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v0.7 RC2 <experimental>
*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf
***
*** performance improvements by girino
***    if you like, donate:
***    PTS: PkyeQNn1yGV5psGeZ4sDu6nz2vWHTujf4h
***    BTC: 1GiRiNoKznfGbt8bkU1Ley85TgVV7ZTXce
*** thanks to wjchen for SSE4 improvements.
***
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
using GPU
spawning 1 worker thread(s)
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
Segmentation fault (Speicherabzug geschrieben)

Pages: [1] 2