Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
They always speak clearly and honestly about the options.
People were upset when they moved away from mining: Now it is common sense!
People were upset when they introduced AGS: Now ICO's are common sense!
People were upset when they introduced DPoS: Now it is our best chance to survive!
People were upset that bitUSD was an experiment: They made it work!
Now people are upset at merger and share issuance, so is this time different? I don't think so; if you watch closely veterans of all stripes on this forum seem to agree with the proposal.
Sorry I had to combo that.
We're going to the moon end of november, and so many people are unhappy. Come on !
This should be its own post
This is an experiment that can be conducted with minimal cost.
QuoteTo the guy who said he wouldn't sell DNS until it was worth more than Namecoin.......how long were you planning on waiting? As of now, DNS is a rebranded BitShares fork with no other features beyond an IOU future implementation of good ideas. There is no product.
You must be referring to me so to answer your question, I wouldn't have sold a single DNS until at least we beat Namecoin no matter how long this would have taken... 1month - 1yr - 2yrs...Completely irrelevant. I base all my investments based on the speed of development and economic fundamentals. That is the reason I am not and will not sell a single BTSX before we reach the 1 billion market cap at least, no matter how long it takes...1yr - 5yrs... And if we don't reach that cap well I will probably lose my investment.
That post although fully on board with DNS getting on BTS, just gave me the impression that DNS just didn't have any value anymore..
I think we have made all DNS holders whole except those who held their DNS on an exchange.
That video was great
To compensate ags/pts holders, Invictus should use the btsx shares of its own to buy back both ags and pts instead of increasing 20% of btsx total amount. As such, 2 billions btsx shares need not be expanded. Actually, as Invictus holds a lot of ags/pts， the big part of the btsx shares Invictus consumes still go back to Invictus. I thinks that this is the best solution.
Bitsharesx is not even close to being a finished or useable product and the core developer focus now goes to a new project?
the idea of a stable cryptoasset token and tying the price point to a fiat currency isn't a novel idea.
Edit: typo
I remember Max Keiser was all over it as well, I think that really helped, he has quite a platform.
I think his pump juice is much weaker now though, felt kind of sad watching him try do the same thing for MaxCoin.
Keiser is involved with Startcoin now though
