Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brekyrself

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 35
286
Marketplace / Re: Crypto theme domain names for sale
« on: March 03, 2016, 06:42:28 am »
March bump.  These are still available, expire 12/05/2016.

cryptobanked.info
cryptobanked.org

cryptomarket.info
cryptomarket.org

p2pmoney.info

287
General Discussion / Re: Now What?
« on: March 02, 2016, 06:48:29 am »
Take a look here on how to migrate to version 2.0

http://docs.bitshares.eu/bitshares/migration/index.html

288
General Discussion / Re: Bytemaster's Account is Down
« on: February 28, 2016, 02:08:41 am »
I'll just leave this right here:
https://youtu.be/3pZaTdEtK-8

289
General Discussion / Lifetime Membership LTM payment options
« on: February 26, 2016, 08:46:08 pm »
From a traders speculation standpoint, why would someone pay the LTM in BTS?  Most here believe BTS is at rock bottom and can significantly go up in price far outweighing investing 20k bts in a lifetime membership at this point.  Should we instead put a FiAT amount for an LTM?

My next question is where does the LTM fee go?

290
Technical Support / Re: Import keys into existing wallet? Do they merge?
« on: February 26, 2016, 08:36:51 pm »
Thanks Xeroc.  My confusion comes from are we importing the account name & balance or just the balance?  Based on your response the account name for 0.9x are gone and we are simply importing a balance?

291
General Discussion / Re: bitSHARES - As True Shares and Not a Currency!
« on: February 26, 2016, 08:34:26 pm »
Quote from: tonyk on February 26, 2016, 07:32:08 pm
Any way, I will not be responding in this thread anymore. It is useless. It is either a very bad idea or an idea that is just too early for BTS to grasp and realize...  Assuming it is the former I have no desire my effort to improve BTS to be largely viewed as some form of attack on BTS.

It is not a bad idea however it may be too early for BTS.  Any traders short term currently using a 3rd party exchange will not want to only trade bts vs FiAT or precious metals.  They want to trade crypto.  Until there are price feeds and markets for crypto derivatives the traders will simply pull off the BitUSD etc... and put it through a gateway such as CCEDK.

What comes first, the chicken or the egg?  Should we be adding additional markets enough though the volume will not be there short term?

292
Technical Support / Import keys into existing wallet? Do they merge?
« on: February 26, 2016, 07:35:16 am »
I'm starting to feel comfortable importing my keys from 0.9x however what exactly happens in the following scenario:

I have already registered a separate name on openledger and have a balance.  When visiting bitshares.openledger.info it automatically loads this wallet.

-When I click "import keys" what exactly will happen? 
-Will it create a 2nd "default" wallet in the management console?  Thus having to select between the two?
-Will I have 1 wallet with both registered names? 
-When I backup the wallet after importing, does it backup both registered names? 
-Is it best practice for safety and security to first "log out" of my newer wallet by clicking delete and then import the 0.9x keys fresh?  I believe I would now have two separate wallet.bin files to manage?

Any walk through on how accounts are linked to the wallet files would be greatly appreciated!

293
General Discussion / Re: Would you support 2% dilution to BitAsset Yield for a 6 month limited trial?
« on: February 24, 2016, 05:13:11 am »
Who exactly is the target of this proposal?

At a high level people with BTS on exchanges want to trade BTS along with other crypto.  One minute they hold BTS, the next something else they think will rise.  A few % may not be enough for them to be motivated to move their bts onto the internal exchange.

What would stop 3rd party exchanges from taking advantage of this?

294
General Discussion / Re: Excerpt from the February 19, 2016 Hangout regarding tonyk's idea
« on: February 23, 2016, 05:58:49 pm »
Almost a double edge sword when it comes to liquidity.  BTS on outside exchanges are not being used as collateral to bring market pegged assets into existence.

295
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 2.0.160216 Released
« on: February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 am »
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics?  How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...

296
General Discussion / Re: bitSHARES - As True Shares and Not a Currency!
« on: February 19, 2016, 02:11:10 am »
@tbone While a 3rd party could trade an IOU, there has been mention of paying a BTS holder a dividend.  This could not be replicated outside the DEX.

297
General Discussion / Re: bitSHARES - As True Shares and Not a Currency!
« on: February 18, 2016, 04:58:36 pm »
Keeping BTS on the internal exchange would also take care of the issue where 3rd party exchanges vote or do not vote with user stake.

298
General Discussion / Re: Emergency Measure - Temporary Shutdown of MineBitShares
« on: February 15, 2016, 08:52:04 pm »
Any updates on the progress of the pool?  I have not seen payouts in a few days.

299
Random Discussion / Re: Monero
« on: February 13, 2016, 10:49:45 pm »
Quote from: Ander on February 13, 2016, 05:16:07 am
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 13, 2016, 04:02:15 am
Quote from: Ander on February 13, 2016, 01:29:03 am
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 13, 2016, 01:18:33 am

With STEALTH coming out next Thursday, why wouldn't you think that BitShares will now become the #1 privacy coin?

Monero's privacy features are vastly superior to bitshares.

(Bitshares is amazing at some other things of course, that Monero doesnt do.  Monero is purely a currency coin).

When you start reading this thread by an old time member I'm not so sure: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319681.0


Go do research.
(Also, that TPTB_need_war guy has very different views on some things, like he doesnt even believe satoshi solved the byzantine generals problem)





I've done plenty of research over the years, perhaps I missed something.  Can you show some links or git hub code on the progress?

I do not believe any of these recent pumps have to do with any coins capabilities, more so just speculation and marketing wins.

300
Random Discussion / Re: Monero
« on: February 13, 2016, 04:02:15 am »
Quote from: Ander on February 13, 2016, 01:29:03 am
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 13, 2016, 01:18:33 am

With STEALTH coming out next Thursday, why wouldn't you think that BitShares will now become the #1 privacy coin?

Monero's privacy features are vastly superior to bitshares.

(Bitshares is amazing at some other things of course, that Monero doesnt do.  Monero is purely a currency coin).

When you start reading this thread by an old time member I'm not so sure: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319681.0

I'm not 100% technical on the code base however AnonyMint points out some interesting things on all these "privacy" coins.

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 35

Page created in 0.203 seconds with 23 queries.