Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I have read the money expenditure of MSC roughly , they only spend 947 BTC so far ,
but III have spended 1319 BTC and 33955 PTS
My guess ... people are dumb and mix up darkwallet, darkmarket and darkcoin...
Bitshares PTS is up at least 15% in the market since they announced this. If you don't like this upgrade, then why not sell now?
All newbies care for the investors here and wish they invest ... elsewere. Am I missing something?
Do you really believe they are invested on PTS ?
I wish, I have invested as little as you 'dani' and posted more, so I have more weight in your eyes!
Bitshares PTS is up at least 15% in the market since they announced this. If you don't like this upgrade, then why not sell now?
All newbies "care" for the investors hereand wish they take their investments ... elsewere. Am I missing something?
Do you really believe they are invested on PTS ?
We have newbies calling others newbies? That is funny.
Bitshares PTS is up at least 15% in the market since they announced this. If you don't like this upgrade, then why not sell now?
and wish they take their investments ... elsewere. Am I missing something?Wow, I wonder why PTS is up 31.6% on coinmarketcap.com?
Back in the Top Ten!
Any theories?
How many PTS do we need in the new snapshot to get a ride in Stan's Bentley ?
Edit - BOOTH BABES !!!! Yea thats the ticket. 1 million worth of booth babes at the next major conference !!
somebody who has spent, 23K $ for this website: [http://bitshares.org/]
Thanks a lot, it's a great place to start!
Charles Hoskinson's video is not on Youtube anymore or at least the link is not working for me (video unavailable). Still more than enough to read and watch even without it
Would it be a good idea to "fire" every X time the last y (even number) delegates (with the lowest votes) from the 99 first delegates even if they have a good reputation so the other delegates on the list (after the 99 first) have the chance to proof they can make also a very good job and collect more votes after they proove it.The same time everybody on the list compete each other to give the best results (having excellent equipmment etc.) so they try to be as higher on the list as possible ... Could it be the case that the first 1-2 years nobody get fired because they are all "trustfull" (until they proove the opposite) and when we really need new "realy" trustfull delegates we don't find them anymore because they don't are anymore on the waiting list? Maybe my suggestion is worthless because I don't understand the concept verry well... at least I am trying to help
This is an interesting concept. Effectively all you are doing is increasing the number of delegates and forcing the lower delegates to 'take turns'.
PS Take 1 PTS (minimum) bounty for that reason
It is my birthday today, so I do not dwell on this for too long now!
The question was always "will there be a MAIDSAFE network in 3 months, 6 months or never?"
The market right now is pricing for never, so if you agree with that assessment it's a good time to sell and if you disagree it's a good time to buy
In 3-6 months we'll know the answer.
There has been significant progress and developments over the past several days. One of the most significant is the introduction of a random number generation scheme and random delegate selection today. This was done for two reasons: it resolves a security vulnerability discovered with sequential DPOS and it facilitates one of the more challenging parts of the Lotto DAC.
We have implemented UPNP networking.
