466
General Discussion / Re: A Rose by Any Other Name
« on: March 09, 2014, 03:39:13 pm »
Great article! Very well written
![+5%](http://bitsharestalk.org/Smileys/aaron/5percent.png)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I don't quite get this discussion. The AGS funding was all sent in voluntarily based on trust that the BitShares team would use it efficiently to build the DAC ecosystem. Part of that trust is that the team would be receptive to the best ideas from the community, but which are best is subjective and determined by those with the private keys. If community members wanted to keep direct ultimate control of these funds, they shouldn't given up control of them in the first place. Pressuring those entrusted with these funds by the community to give direct control of a portion to a subset of the community against their better judgement would turn this into a redistribution platform rather than voluntary trust based stewardship.
There's a massive reward for building a truly successful DAC and being one of the earliest investors in it. Any sort of artificial reward based on contrived standards of success only incentivizes faking success well enough to meet the standards.
Who is this "we" that you speak of? I have read every one of Adam's posts, and although they contain some very interesting, informed and provocative ideas, I could not feel any less like leaving this community. In fact, the opposite, the complaining and fighting over the past few days has put a few areas and issues into better perspective for me personally, and now I want to contribute more actually as I have appreciated the responses from Invictus and their stance on these important matters.
By advertising on LTBLike Nxt? It's not good enough. We need personal interview with him.
Of course its always risky doing math in public, but you get the general idea. AGS holders will get so liquid they can go for a swim.
"A company called Bitshares." Excellent.
Positive time!
I think the last iteration swag doesn't appeal to the types of people you would find at bitcoin conferences. In a recent conversation, another forumite gave these characteristics:Quote-95%+ predominantly male
-higher education than average
-at the very least they already know about bitcoin and probably have general idea of the implications of blockchain technologies and decentralized systems
-have philosophical and political views that align more with libertarian and anarchist perspectives
-more than likely have a monetary incentive; or some variation of self-interest
My opinion is that you need a clean, simple t-shirt design with a company or product logo and your favorite from among these:
* Decentralize Everything
* Decentralized Solutions to Centralized Problems
* BitShares X: Decentralized Bank and Exchange
* BitShares ___: _______
* Life, Liberty, Property
* Reimagine Everything, with some visual aid to tell you what kind of things to reimagine
Looking forward to hear more about the event, how was BitShares received by the audience, interesting meetings, news etc! Thanks
Also list Social as childboard under General Discussion.