571
中文 (Chinese) / Re: bts抵押直接借出bitCNY或bitUSD的功能?
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:28:30 am »
自己抵押自己买,三倍抵押,就相当于直接借出bitcny
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
572
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 成立一个 BTS电子竞技俱乐部，申请100%受托人 专打LOL职业联赛 靠谱不？
« on: January 27, 2015, 09:22:29 am »
BTS 500刀时候相当靠谱, 但bts价格还低支撑不起来 lol战队, 如果赞助的话,还不错,
让一流战队 来bts上发布资产,粉丝喜欢可以购买站队资产, 凑满一定数量的资产,可以签名,吃饭,陪练,N多优惠,
让一流战队 来bts上发布资产,粉丝喜欢可以购买站队资产, 凑满一定数量的资产,可以签名,吃饭,陪练,N多优惠,
573
General Discussion / Re: can we analysis how much true users in 32800+ id?
« on: January 26, 2015, 02:53:59 am »
why you want to analysis it ?
574
General Discussion / what is useful of Bitshares-js?
« on: January 25, 2015, 02:47:10 pm »
I notice there is project named Bitshares-js in github. maybe the useful would been clear for people with code experience， but i think some people in there like me don`t know ,what is it for.
anyone can say it ,thank you
anyone can say it ,thank you
575
General Discussion / Re: Account 'bter' please return funds
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:00:28 am »
I check the deposit instruction in bter.com as the follow picture show. maybe you made a mistake when you transfer bts to bter.com
576
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 暂停 BTSBOTS
« on: January 25, 2015, 05:16:09 am »
短短不到 两个月 竟然有23%的利润，ALT 你不该放弃这个事情啊
577
General Discussion / Re: The New Consensus: Bitshares' response to DecentralizedEconomics criticisms
« on: January 24, 2015, 10:31:18 am »There is confusion about we what wish to commit to now and what the reality about how the system works is.what we really want to do ? why we start?
The system is ruled by shareholder vote. If you promise a fixed cap as part of the system, you are lying. The chance to have people believe anything the devs or the code says has passed. The only thing left is the consensus metric.
If you promise a fixed cap is what everyone thinks is the best option to commit to now, that's a different story. We should have a shareholder vote of confidence to convince the world that's what current shareholders want.
578
General Discussion / Do you sell part of your BTS and buy some PLS when it IPO
« on: January 24, 2015, 08:08:45 am »
Do you sell part of your BTS and buy some PLS when it IPO
580
General Discussion / How many BTS AGS fund have, and which delegate that ags fund voted
« on: January 23, 2015, 06:16:02 pm »
How many BTS AGS fund have, and which delegate that ags fund voted
I don`t know if it is a public imformation and where can find it
and which delegate that bts voted for。
I don`t know if it is a public imformation and where can find it
and which delegate that bts voted for。
581
General Discussion / Re: who sell 2M BTS on BTC38.COM
« on: January 23, 2015, 04:27:22 pm »
LOL , it is to difficult to understand that you prefer btc.
582
General Discussion / who sell 2M BTS on BTC38.COM
« on: January 23, 2015, 03:22:21 pm »
who sell 2M BTS on BTC38.COM
583
General Discussion / Re: The New Consensus: Bitshares' response to DecentralizedEconomics criticisms
« on: January 23, 2015, 11:38:50 am »It is really kind of a catch-22 on the community. Imagine for a moment that BTS value fell down to $10M because Bitcoin fell down to $80. At our maximum dilution rate of 50 BTS per block (~6% per year) your development budget would be crushed to $600,000 per year which is enough to pay about 5 developers each with 20 delegates.I agree you almost your view so far, but this time ,I disagree
Who would we let go? Toast, Nathan, Vikram, Valentine, Ben, Me, Stan, the entire marketing team?
So while I think it is safe to say that we will never dilute by more than $3 million dollars per year of capital infusion I doubt the stakeholders would want to cripple our team which is the only hope we have toward long term viability.
As it stands right now, we will need 101 fully paid 100% delegates to maintain our current burn rate. The community would have to start making tough choices on who to let go.
Many developers would take "equity" in place of salary (ie, not contribute to sell pressure) but if you cannot offer them equity then they will go work someplace else and support BitShares part time if at all.
On the other hand by the time we grow to be the size of Bitcoin it is inconceivable that we should need any additional dilution. So I would be sure to caveat any "rules" on dilution to only apply at market caps above $250M because below that point we are still in the "bootstrap" phase.
Not saying I want to dilute, I would much rather have us grow faster than we are diluting, but we can never guess how Bitcoin's fate could impact us.
if price of btc drop to $80, why do you think BTS value fell down to $10M ,HI BM ,we have so many 100% pay delegates, if this mechanism is effective , 100% pay delegate would bring the real value to BTS system , the price of BTS would increase ,at least doesn`t drop with BTC. if the result is not , then I think the mechanism of 100% pay delegate is`t effective, so we should vote out all 100% pay delegate rather than 101 fully paid 100% delegates.
584
General Discussion / Re: Please Consider Voting for fuzzy.beyondbitcoin
« on: January 23, 2015, 09:43:51 am »After DNS is merged by Super DAC, I only have 1 M DNS, but I consider many people lost because of price of DNS drop , I donation any all 1 M DNS just for support other people.
That person asked about the money.
It isn't about spending the money to support others.
It is whether the inflation funds should pay for every bit of your free time or force you to be in some exclusive contract. A real greedy asshole might say "Well Fuzzy if you aren't spending all your time on BTS then you deserve nothing from the blockchain. It doesn't matter all the time you have selflessly donated!" Just ignore them. Those are the types of people that have chased me off from wanting to have the RPM community on this board and went with the PTS board instead. Long live PTS!
While the core developers never display this attitude there is a very vocal minority on here that does. I deeply hope you are not too swayed by them. Luckily it appears you have what it takes to rise above that stupid bullshit and realize that realistically none of these other chains are a direct threat to BitShares. Pushing PTS off has done nothing but result in a bit of brain drain as PC and Cube both seem to be very competent.
we should support other people but it is must reasonable.
I don`t understand what really bring to BTS by airdrop. MMC airdrop to PTS, LTS airdrop to PTS, you can see the price of MMC and LTS now , actually lost about 4000 bitusd in investing MMC, I know it is marketing except BTS/PTS and an other coin , mmc is the only coin bought. maybe a new dac would bring really value. but most of DAC is nothing.
585
General Discussion / Re: Please Consider Voting for fuzzy.beyondbitcoin
« on: January 23, 2015, 04:08:25 am »
I would vote you ,but I have a question ,
why you using BTS delegate pay to support 3rd part DAC that tend to share drop to bts , what they can bring to BTS?
why you using BTS delegate pay to support 3rd part DAC that tend to share drop to bts , what they can bring to BTS?
