Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vikram

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 82
812
General Discussion / Re: When is next hardfork?
« on: November 10, 2014, 04:34:48 pm »
I use WolframAlpha with:

( fork_block - current_block ) * 10 seconds

And it automatically tells you the time in the future.

813
General Discussion / Re: BitShares Important Announcements
« on: November 08, 2014, 12:26:46 am »
Release candidate for BitShares v0.4.24 has been released for users that want to help test: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases/tag/v0.4.24-RC1

Final release will be a required upgrade by block 991700.

814
what's strange is that it seems that the blockchain does not know about my account.  My account has indeed been registered back in August as "patrickb323".  But, when I sent from my other wallet the transaction shows up as traderemma1 -> UNKNOWN even though I have received the funds in the target account "patrickb323".

The UNKNOWN message is due to the private nature of TITAN combined with some bugs in the wallet scanning. It does not have to do with the blockchain not knowing about the username.

816
Technical Support / Re: Order cancel ate some funds
« on: November 07, 2014, 05:08:40 pm »
I run v0.4.23.1-90-gbb33f21 built on Ubuntu. Any suggestions?

For the record, I would discourage using in-between version builds like this unless someone on the team recommends a particular commit for a particular problem.

817

I'm not sure if this is correct . My understanding is that the toolkit has the core technology in it, so you got DPOS, you got the market, the peg mechanism,Titan,etc. Now of course  you need to modify it if you want to make a different DAC. I.E Bithshare Music although it has a completely different business model is basically BithsareX with very few changes AlphaBar PTS same think. HackerFisher could confirm if PLAY it is using the toolkit to make the DAC.  So given the fact that  it is open source and already a few DACS are using it I think we can call it the DAC framework.

I'm not sure either.  Forking a program and modifying it isn't really what I'd call a toolkit, but understandably Dan couldn't have terribly accurate foresight when trying to come up with a plan in the early days.

Thats the problem though, the core technology is there and I don't think much will be added to aid the toolkit itself.  I'm not sure how much documentation was ever created to enable the use of the toolkit either. So what will the BTS DAC have done to help the toolkit ?  From any of my observations, it will have done nothing if not made it worse.

Anyway, these are just thoughts of mine.  I was fairly angry when a lot of this was announced but now is not the time to be divisive.  If I was pissed off enough I would have taken my stuff and went on down the road to life's next interest.

edit - AlphaBar-PTS  seems to be about as far along as RandPaulCoin which appears to be nothing so far.  Everything else you mentioned has had explicit i3 support on some level.

Majority of the code is features added on-the-fly to enhance BTS(X); most of it is irrelevant for a pure DPOS chain. Features cannot easily be added/subtracted--to call it a toolkit is misleading. As you said, there was not the luxury of extended experience and planning early on.

818
Technical Support / Re: Which Bitshares Github fork should I build from?
« on: November 06, 2014, 07:18:48 pm »
Currently dacsun master branch is the only stable version.

After v0.4.24 is released, bitshares master branch will have the stable versions.

819
General Discussion / Re: Priority Tech Support for Exchanges
« on: November 04, 2014, 09:10:09 pm »
In the past we have provided direct support to exchanges over Skype chats. I have pm'ed you my username.

820
Technical Support / Re: BitsharesX 64-bit Client
« on: November 04, 2014, 09:00:59 pm »
I have downloaded, installed, uninstalled, and reinstalled the BitsharesX client multiple times in an attempt to get it to sync up with the blockchain, with no luck.
The client says it has no connection and will not update to the current status no matter how long I leave it running. I have a couple thousand BitsharesX linked to my account with no way of getting to them. Has anyone else had this issue and/or know of a possible remedy?  Is there an online portal to the BitsharesX wallet that I may use to access instead?

There seem to be many problems with that status bar not updating. If you go to the command console and type the "info" command, does it say you are on head block 0? Or does it look like you are actually synced up or has connections?

821
Technical Support / Re: Wallet version upgrade failed - "Scan failure"
« on: November 04, 2014, 08:57:14 pm »
Several reports of this problem; it will be fixed in 0.4.24.

822
General Discussion / Re: Cannot sync new client if less 2G Ram
« on: November 04, 2014, 08:54:10 pm »
A significant memory leak has been found and fixed for upcoming v0.4.24: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/759

823
Technical Support / Re: insufficient funds?
« on: November 04, 2014, 08:50:38 pm »
If I understand your explanation correctly; it seems that this should work. I have made a note about it: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/916

Currently you must always add an address as a local account before sending funds to it. There will be a command to send directly to an address in the future, but such a change has been stuck in low priority.

824
Technical Support / Re: wallet_account_balance broken?
« on: November 04, 2014, 08:34:55 pm »
Just pulled from git and rebuilt; seems that wallet_get_balance is broken now. 

 >>> wallet_account_balance
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
v.size() <= sizeof( fc::ripemd160 ) + 4: all addresses are less than 24 bytes

This has busted our workflow.  Is there a new call we should be making?

This was an issue that snuck into 0.4.23.1 due to a change that was intended for 0.4.24. It will be fixed in 0.4.24: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/914

825
General Discussion / Re: Proposed UIA changes for mid-November upgrade
« on: November 04, 2014, 08:29:21 pm »
The linked change fixes the price:
  • Assets with symbols of 6, 7, or 8 characters cost 500 BTS to register
  • Assets with symbols of 3, 4, or 5 characters cost 500,000 BTS to register

Obviously not ideal, but potentially good enough. bytemaster picked this formula--I would contact him directly to have him post the motivation here because he may not see this post otherwise.

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 82