So looking at the docs here: https://bitshares.org/doxygen/group__operations.html there is an operation defined here:

graphene::chain::vesting_balance_create_operation

It doesnt specify if this can be used on any Bitshares asset however? Is it possible to stake any UIA via this operation? I assume this is how Cryptobridge are staking BCO?

Thanks

Thanks PC. Yep seems like this would do the trick for burning, but why would it be useless? If they do not burn open.BTC upon withdrawal then they will be running a greater than 100% supply of OPEN.BTC than their current wallet in which case it would reduce faith in the backing of that asset given it could result in an inflated supply of UIA's.

A burn operation? Documented where? So if you return the open.BTC to their wallet then then they issue a on-chain OP to burn them? Can they then be re-issued from supply later?

Like Open.BTC for example, if you deposit BTC then openledger will issue an OPEN.BTC, but when you withdraw BTC it should be destroyed, how does an issuer destroy a UIA?

Hi can anyone comment on this?

It seems the 'My Markets' menu has a hardcoded amount of markets. It also seems they dont track the volume of other coins trading on the DEX as per cryptofresh. Additionally why are Openledger coins default on this panel (e.g. an open.BTC tab)? We have many gateways now, the default downloadable UI should be neutral on this.

Can anyone explain these two things as to why? Is this something that needs to be rolled into another bitshares-UI update?

Quick question from a Newbie, if you are trading a pair containing two cryptos with differing 'Market fees' specified like OPEN.BTC (0.2%) / BitUSD (0%) it would be assumed the total cost for this trade would be 0.2%. However if BitUSD had a 0.2% fee then the total would be 0.4% in trade fees is this correct? 0.2% deducted either side, and if one was 0.3% then it would have 0.3% deducted from one side?

Also, in the above example of OPEN.BTC and BitUSD, when I exchange 1 OPEN.BTC for say 1000 BitUSD, how are the fees deducted? For example do I end up paying 1 OPEN.BTC for 998 BitUSD or 0.998 OPEN BTC for 1000 BitUSD?

Thanks for the reply nmywn, so looks like as you say, there are many doors into the same room and that openledger is just one of them which copies the UI of the light client.

Question: Openledger is a company who runs OpenLedger.info which looks same as how everything looks in the Bitshares Light client in terms of UI etc. Is the Bitshares light client just connecting to Openledger to display a UI? What happens if Openledger.info is hacked and brought down, then nobody can use their Bitshares clients anymore?

Why arent there more alternatives for 'visualising' this decentralised exchange because currently I just see some company running a website (openledger.info) which if it went down we are all screwed? Is it openledger that decides what assets to trade and display in the light client?

Thanks !

Ok understood now, thanks guys, will keep investigating.

Hi, I am just trying our BItshares, I downloaded the client on bitshares.org and am looking at the integrated exchange feature. Is this just connecting to Openledger.info on the backend? From my understanding Openledger is a counterparty like any old exchange, the assets they issues like OPEN.BTC have no proof of reserves or anything you just trust they have the equivalent amount of OPEN.BTC to support trades, is this correct? The bitshares website talks alot about the DEX so does it exist on the client I downloaded and when I place trades I am trading with others using the client or how does it work? Thanks!