Christmas :
0.0162 USD
209 satoshi


New year day:
0.01701 USDT
231 satoshi

Quote from: Victor118 on March 14, 2019, 02:02:01 pm

where can I find how many bts have the reserve fund?

The "reserve fund" is virtual, i. e. it is calculated as the difference between maximum supply and current supply of the core asset. Currently this is about 3600570502 - 2699223195 = 901347307 BTS, see https://open-explorer.io/#/assets/1.3.0 .

The amount spent on workers and witnesses is not fixed. It is a small percentage of the current reserve fund, i. e. in theory it will never run out.

Haaa Ok, thanks

Quote from: finn-bts on March 11, 2019, 02:20:38 am

Quote from: bitcrab on March 10, 2019, 02:25:26 pm

IMHO, current daily budget is 280K BTS/day, it's not a low figure.

I don't think it's a good idea to fulfill all the proposal/projects，we also need to limit the inflation of BTS.

How many BTS are flowing back into the system's pool each day?

~6-7k

Does it mean that circulating supply increase by ~270K BTS each day ?

I was reading this BSIP discussion :
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/100
If someday it will be possible to create a MPA backed by multiple UIA, may be it will be possible to join all BTC in one MPA ?
On bitshares there is a lot of different BTC (open.BTC, bridge.BTC, rudex.BTC ...)
By cumulating all these BTC the liquidity of BTC would become very interesting on bitshares.
But today there's no link between all those gateway's BTC
It may be stupid and may not be feasible, but what about a BTC MPA backed by as much BTC as possible.
This MPA would be backed by 1 open.BTC or 1 bridge.BTC ...,
Holding 1 MPA BTC is equivalent to holding any type of gateway. BTC, at any time you can settle those BTC and retrieve diverse gateway.BTC
For example I want to deposit some BTC on open.ledger, today openLedger send me open.BTC in exchange, it will be necessary that open.ledger creates MPA.BTC by "borrowing" mpa.BTC by putting open.btc in collateral and send me the MPA.BTC thus created.
I can trade with those MPA.BTC, and then withdraw by settle my BTC and withdraw my gateway's BTC (UI could be better by putting settlement implicit when withdraw MPA.BTC)
On the other hand, it would be necessary to find an incentive for the gateways to use this MPA and to create and supply them to their client rather than their own UIA.

I guess it raises a lot of problems, but is it feasible with bitshares's features?

Interesting
May be it's a good idea to think about to implement a game of dice in bitshares core?

Quote from: kennybll-accnt on December 17, 2018, 01:48:36 pm

One thing is the transfer and asset issuing costs. I believe RuDEX as well as CryptoBridge, not sure about others, issue their UIAs when someone deposits. Increasing the asset issuance, by that much, will cause some extra costs to those gateways, and possibly shutdown of certain coins. I don't know if that will happen. I hope blckchnd can enlighten us, not sure if he's on here. I get for the normal user, but we should also think about the gateways.

Exactly point - where blockchain earns then ? If Rudex, OL or CB just click and issue bunch of UIA's they are charging for 1 and 2 percent market fees and blockchain earns what ? 1/10th of a cent ? Self-funded ? Long-lasting ? My ass.

0.03 or 0.05 USD to be paid once you issue amount of assets is not that much. For the fact, gateways can update their current scripts and replace part where deposit issues asset, and instead issue assets to coldstorage wallet on BTS and use simple transfer on each deposit received.

Please keep in mind that reserve pool (blockchain) currently earns nothing, while others do. As BitShares is core of all those businesses - its not healthy position for BitShares to continue operating at current fees. End of discussion.

@clockwork - full support!

Great, it works, thank you.

But I don't know why I have an empty array as result for :

Apis.instance().db_api().exec( "get_trade_history", [ "BTS","USD","2018-12-16T15:09:11","2018-12-17T15:09:11",100 ] );