Quote from: xolokram on August 18, 2014, 07:55:35 PM
i think you'll have to ask crz
this version has a hardcoded IP i think and beeeeer's PTS server is completely shut down

Yes - cudaPTSwin is discontinued and I have closed the download links. Reason: beeeeer's PTS server is completely shut down, thank you all for the support!

Hi,

Im mining 3 days now RIC at your pool.

My unconfirmed RIC is above 10+ ric now, but nothing in my balance/paid? Some

Is everyhing ok with the pool? Some ric got Confirmation: 597+ but nothing in my balance..

Cheers

Quote from: mubinok on April 16, 2014, 01:13:05 AM

Quote from: crz on April 14, 2014, 07:43:45 PM
New version up for all versions.

Cheers!

Thank you for the noirshares version for cuda.

I have to wonder if it was a mistake or why does "cudaNRSwin-0.1-cuda-2-crz" mine 600 seconds to support further development?
That is 10 MINUTES. 30 seconds would be acceptable but not 10 MINUTES.

Next version will have 1% - 5% donation overall and compute capability 3.5 with high memory support. And pool + port select support.

New version up for all versions.

Cheers!

Quote from: zizux on February 25, 2014, 04:52:14 AM
Are you guys using the experimental one?

my 780 ti's went from ~1400 c/m to 1750 c/m each by not using the experimental one.  And that is with default everything, I'm sure they could do more.

Yes some users have more c/m with the exp 4.0 version and some don't. Big difference is - the 4.0 exp version is using more memory.

Update soon,

Cheers!

Quote from: guobacoo on February 14, 2014, 07:37:25 AM
is there any plan for an update?
crashes too often

Can you explain the crashes? And yes got an update but not yet ready for public.

No problems here yet, will look in 2 it asap.

Cheers!

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply, work work.....

Will post the new version soon and reply on all your questions.

Will have a linux version 2.

Cheers!

Quote from: thesuperconductor on January 22, 2014, 01:46:48 AM
Any update on low memory video cards (768mb, GTX 460)? I'm really looking forward to using your miner!

Yes almost done will need tester.

Quote from: pafnucy on January 23, 2014, 11:35:09 AM
Tested 0.4-experimental on:
Win7 x64, Xeon E5-2620 + Tesla K20c, avx mode
Result:
~1100c/s

I notice that only about 1GB of GPU RAM is used as reported by nvsmi tool. Any chance for a super-high memory version?  8)

Yes, how much GB version you need? :-)

Quote from: nod on January 17, 2014, 08:03:58 PM

Quote from: archit on January 17, 2014, 10:45:43 AM

Quote from: relm9 on January 17, 2014, 09:13:44 AM

Quote from: earthbound on January 16, 2014, 11:16:05 PM
Only curious--did my posts about iruu's suggestion and also any of my code help out?

(I still vote you get mining donation prizes for getting it done.)

I should mention... I tried out your code yesterday and it worked for me. Initially it wasn't printing anything to the screen after the startup messages, however, I merged the latest  changes dga made with your source and it worked fine. Was going to post but then saw this so didn't bother. This version seems to be perform the same, 1600-1700 c/m on a 780.

None of these versions should have any changes in speed, all of them are based on dga's code.

sm30 fast
gtx780
cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-3.0: 1800cpm
cudaPTSwin-0.3-cuda-3.5: 1200cpm

wow did you use my optimized versions? try the 0.4 version :)

Quote from: hai_tran on January 17, 2014, 05:33:03 AM

Quote from: crz on January 16, 2014, 12:30:38 PM

Quote from: hai_tran on January 16, 2014, 05:18:34 AM
<gpu's-to-use> How to use multi GPUs (2, 3, 4)? tks

If you got 1 GPU use, use: 0
If you got 2 GPU's use, use: 1
If you got 3 GPU's use, use: 2

Hope it helps, If you have any further questions, please let me know. Don't forget to post your stats. :)

Cheers!

tks for your guide... I've tested but not success. I run 2 GTX 670 and use 1, but it just run 1 GPU. So I have to run 2 scripts, one use 0 and one use 1... It run 2 gpus well. So you can help again, tks so much

My stats: xeon W3530 - avx - one GTX 670 (Kepler, 2GB): 880-900 c/m used cudaPTSwin-0.4

880-900 c/m is the speed of 1 single GTX 670? If you open up 2 windows you get 2 x 900 c/m correct?

Quote from: earthbound on January 17, 2014, 05:07:44 AM
[I think my last post was unnecessary, and I've deleted it.]

I apologize, crz, for putting you on the defensive. It looks like I probably was greatly mistaken, too.

Please edit our unhappy exchanges out of your posts (and/or delete the posts), and I'll do the same (and also delete this post itself, after a while).

Removed thanks.

Quote from: Hurlie on January 17, 2014, 11:10:04 AM
Hello,

nice work:)

The miner work excellent.

Beside this, I have 2 questions regarding the CPM.

My machine:

Processor: AMD FX8350
RAM: 16 GB
Graphics: 2* GTX 650

1. Question:
I reach a CPM rate of 300 to 350.
Compared with your benchmark, this seems to be not so much.

2. Question:
I called the miner with:
cudaPTSwin.exe "adr" 1-
The "1" means, both GTX 650 should work.

In the response of the program, every found collision is generated bei GPU "0".

<<[WORKER] collision found: 17070511 <-> 59251628 #162 @ 1389956781 by 0
<<[WORKER] collision found: 59251628 <-> 17070511 #162 @ 1389956781 by 0
<<[WORKER] collision found: 15759157 <-> 64019081 #164 @ 1389956781 by 0

The second GPU seems to be ununsed.

Is this correct?
Or where can I see, how much GPUs are working?

Or, when both GPUs are working, a CPM of 300-350 seems to be really slow.

Thanks for your help.

Sincerly yours,

Hurlie

Hi Hurly, can you start up 2 cudaptswin.exe?
One gpu with: 0
And the other gpu with: 1

And report the CPM.

I don't have multi nvidia card rig (only multi ati rig ;)), will setup test machine with 3 nvidia cards.

Cheers!

Update on dropbox (all versions) - Removed windows 32 bit compatibility because all user use 64 bit.