1
General Discussion / Re: One possible attack to POS mining
« on: March 28, 2014, 06:15:21 pm »Quote
In the long term the network is far more secure and the best fork can be unambiguously chosen.
This appears true to me, but I'm not aware of a formal proof. Is there one? The TaPoS paper appears to be out of date, mentioning CDD as an absolute measure on the chain rather than a measure per block.
Quote
1) Double Spend - requires someone with significant money to make an anonymous transaction to avoid getting caught. Large anonymous transactions will likely require hours of confirmation.
Why must large anonymous transactions require hours of confirmation?
Quote
If a large share holder were to execute a double spend attack the value of their shares would likely fall by more than they could steal. If the transaction were not anonymous then everyone would know who to avoid doing business with.
The fall would presumably be temporary, otherwise I can argue that a small investment of $15M may be sufficient to crash the value of the coin, even if BTS were to reach the market cap of BTC.
There may be externalities that incentivize a large share holder to intentionally lose value in exchange for a double spend. There are many examples, but a few that comes to mind: the attacker may have short positions in external markets, e.g. in those of companies that utilize this coin. Or, the attacker may have an incentive to promote another currency system.