1
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 免费派送DOGECOIN资产，排好队，别抢留言的都有份。。。
« on: March 01, 2015, 09:24:23 am »
yoo-pupu
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
中文 (Chinese) / invalid command "wallet_check_sharedrop"
« on: February 11, 2015, 05:03:32 pm »
我看到大家介绍导入的各种文章，都提到这个命令，为何我在 0.6 的客户端执行，提示
invalid command "wallet_check_sharedrop"
呢？
原则上现在的 bts-v 只是以前的bts，需要再次导入pts dns 等的wallet私钥，是吧？
多谢
invalid command "wallet_check_sharedrop"
呢？
原则上现在的 bts-v 只是以前的bts，需要再次导入pts dns 等的wallet私钥，是吧？
多谢
3
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 还没有导入pts换dns过，这样快照能照到么
« on: October 26, 2014, 09:16:02 am »
那为什么不导呢- -
虽然toast在英文帖说了没关系，superdac的时候，你直接导入就可以，你去查查他的post吧。但安全第一啊，为何不去换呢？- -
虽然toast在英文帖说了没关系，superdac的时候，你直接导入就可以，你去查查他的post吧。但安全第一啊，为何不去换呢？- -
4
KeyID / Re: v0.0.5 tagged - MANDATORY - checkpoint, end-of-life, and misc bugfixes
« on: October 26, 2014, 08:55:39 am »Why should KeyID blockchain be turned off? Lets keep it on.
Why we need additional chain if all KeyID functionality will be integrated into BTS?
Maybe you don't need it, but why kill a live and trading network? It may have a future of its own. Anyway I am going to give it a chance to live.
Setting up a new testnet for post merger KeyID now.
seed, maybe ~
5
General Discussion / Re: why not AGS10%+PTS10%+ BTS10% when NEW 3rd DACs honor for
« on: October 25, 2014, 10:51:23 am »
I do agree with this advice.
In my opinion,
pts or ags can reduce some ratio because them will be apart of the bts, a little overlap.
If comfirm that ags is just a donation behaviour, the proposal is 10% pts & 10% bts.
Ratio is not the key point, just protect the earlier Consensus.
Dispute isnot just at ratio, but the honor is 'recommended' or 'must'?
ok, 'recommend'? keep disputing.
In my opinion,
pts or ags can reduce some ratio because them will be apart of the bts, a little overlap.
If comfirm that ags is just a donation behaviour, the proposal is 10% pts & 10% bts.
Ratio is not the key point, just protect the earlier Consensus.
Dispute isnot just at ratio, but the honor is 'recommended' or 'must'?
ok, 'recommend'? keep disputing.
6
General Discussion / Re: A new currency DAC - the future of Bitshares PTS
« on: October 25, 2014, 09:24:30 am »
interesting, mark here
i am a web developer maybe provide some help.
i am a web developer maybe provide some help.
7
General Discussion / Re: Explanation for PTS/AGS Holders goes here!
« on: October 25, 2014, 09:04:36 am »I didn't betray anyone... I have many friends and family that are AGS holders post Feb 28... I am a large ags holder Post Feb 28.
AGS was a gift... no strings attached. Anyone who has AGS and is complaining has no one they can blame but themselves for setting wrong expectations.
We said we would recommend AGS/PTS get 10% each of *FUTURE* DACs built using the toolkit. Congrats, you got 10% of *PAST* dacs as well.
so why delete the "draft license"? Shy?
Did we have a announcement which announced that it was a draft license？
If somebody saw it before and wanted support 3i to be a long long-term investments, then went to sleep long time, when he wake up, he finds he is naked.
Yes it's his fault, it's ourself's responsibilities to invest in something, even something(who is something?funny) is always so changeable.
Social Consensus is not Sincerity, i got it.
PS, bm, is bt & b in your list?
8
General Discussion / Re: [POLL] DISCUSSION: Should 3rd-party DACs honor AGS/PTS?
« on: October 25, 2014, 08:41:35 am »
10% ags 10% pts, 10% or more bts is perfect.
ags maybe a gift, but pts is prototype what 3i defined before, if wanna pts die, 3i need buy them back from market!
ags maybe a gift, but pts is prototype what 3i defined before, if wanna pts die, 3i need buy them back from market!
9
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 中文社区点名时间，直接投票省事，看看有多少人。
« on: October 25, 2014, 08:37:22 am »
都是炒客而已，有时候看着群里各种乌烟瘴气，500刀，嘿嘿，各种污言秽语，真心都是潜水看着- -
技术流的很少吧，逛英文论坛，更别扯了- -
技术流的很少吧，逛英文论坛，更别扯了- -
10
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 我想问3i和BTS的脑残粉，为什么预售要接收BTC而不是BTSX？
« on: October 25, 2014, 08:29:34 am »
大家不怕bts后面出来 bt, b....吗？
11
中文 (Chinese) / 含冤离场的弄个大事记，让未来来评比，推给新的投资者看看“所谓共识”
« on: October 25, 2014, 03:54:17 am »
如题
投资有风险，入市需谨慎。没有信用，共识就是收割机，人民民主专政的苦头我们吃的不少了～～～ 天朝天天期盼皇帝人治，年年依法治国，奋斗终身呐
merger以后，一定会有下一波的 “共识”的，拭目以待
投资有风险，入市需谨慎。没有信用，共识就是收割机，人民民主专政的苦头我们吃的不少了～～～ 天朝天天期盼皇帝人治，年年依法治国，奋斗终身呐
merger以后，一定会有下一波的 “共识”的，拭目以待
12
General Discussion / Re: Explanation for PTS/AGS Holders goes here!
« on: October 22, 2014, 05:20:39 pm »I was and I'm still mostly concerned about the bolded text:
4.The genesis block of any blockchain must allocate 10% of the total lifetime shares ever allocated by the blockchain to the holders of BitShares PTS proportional to the percentage of total BitShares PTS held. Additionally 10% of the total lifetime shares ever allcoated by the blockchain to the holders of BitShares AGS must be allocated in the genesis block.
I was trying to explain this in so many posts that you might think I'm a spammer. I'm not that concerned about BTS ownership of PTS/AGS. I'm concerned about the failure to fulfill that non-binding promise-like thingy. I think post feb28 AGS/PTS holders have the right to feel lied to and whine about that.
Actually I've said too much already given the fact my stake is really tiny. I'll not make this specific topic any harder for you.
agree with you, pts/ags is just a joke? no 10% promise, my god, i just a blind investor.
13
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 另一个角度看合并
« on: October 22, 2014, 04:21:09 pm »欢迎竞争，你说得很轻松，你去开发一个DNS，要分股份给AGS、PTS。跟我的想法一样，BM抛出这个想法的前几天我就在想：要是其它DAC一样发行USD，一样的铆钉，那要BTSX干什么，DNS要USD有USD要应用有应用，谁的应用广泛谁的USD就有话语权，如今BTSX要统一这个话语权才能够产生很多这些应用的叠加效应，而不是因为DAC的应用而产生分化效应。+5%。
总之一句话，“发展壮大BTSX的核心思想是不会变的”，要拆迁总是有些钉子户，但是假设发展壮大的是今后的VOTE或者重新搞一个BTS，更加伤筋动骨！
从我的 iPhone 发送，使用 Tapatalk
bm自己也说了欢迎竞争，那USD好用，MUSIC,DNS要用，为何还怕别人别人强大开发一个USD2呢
你无可避免未来有其他dac，功能有重叠
没竞争，bm更肆无忌惮改你的“共识了”
做好之后BM不废吹灰之力在BTSX中fork你的DNS，想到这一点，你还有动力去研发么？
再假设具体一点，假如你是个投资者，现在小面包不同意整合，要出来单干。BM没办法，在X中集成他的DNS，你愿意投资BM还是面包？
从我的 iPhone 发送，使用 Tapatalk
那他可以呀，不过他将面临第三方dac的信用崩溃，只要他能承受。
他的远景，其实还是基准btsx，百家齐放，只要锚定USD，大家就会用它作为法币出入口。它可以整合DNS等任何功能，或者收购，那也应该是拿自己的钱包去收购DNS，哪里有现在这样的道理。支持单干。
现在怎么就到了不整合btsx就死的节奏吗，那music出来后，一句老母亲要死了，为了减少网络效应，music你滚回来，我增发给你3%。
反正社区的分裂在所难免了，bm或许每次都是好意，毕竟3i是大股东，但真心都造成各种寒心和动荡
14
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 另一个角度看合并
« on: October 22, 2014, 03:00:44 pm »跟我的想法一样，BM抛出这个想法的前几天我就在想：要是其它DAC一样发行USD，一样的铆钉，那要BTSX干什么，DNS要USD有USD要应用有应用，谁的应用广泛谁的USD就有话语权，如今BTSX要统一这个话语权才能够产生很多这些应用的叠加效应，而不是因为DAC的应用而产生分化效应。+5%。
总之一句话，“发展壮大BTSX的核心思想是不会变的”，要拆迁总是有些钉子户，但是假设发展壮大的是今后的VOTE或者重新搞一个BTS，更加伤筋动骨！
从我的 iPhone 发送，使用 Tapatalk
bm自己也说了欢迎竞争，那USD好用，MUSIC,DNS要用，为何还怕别人别人强大开发一个USD2呢
你无可避免未来有其他dac，功能有重叠
没竞争，bm更肆无忌惮改你的“共识了”
15
General Discussion / Re: Proposal to Resolve a Million Issues at Once
« on: October 22, 2014, 02:57:02 pm »
oh, four in one, sounds good
i can see some days later, you, bm would announce that, we need pts2, ags2, we need more money to lift ourself.
we can see that day, it's funny.
i can see some days later, you, bm would announce that, we need pts2, ags2, we need more money to lift ourself.
we can see that day, it's funny.
Pages: [1] 2
