1
DevShares / Re: Cannot import json wallet file
« on: January 07, 2015, 06:34:33 pm »
I'd like that function too!
Is there any other method to redeem founds from BTS?
Is there any other method to redeem founds from BTS?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: New delegate: moon.warlock
« on: December 18, 2014, 05:25:18 pm »Thanks for the votes so far..
Looking over other delegates, it seems these below are those ones outside 101 and providing the right version and feeds.
Perhaps consider transferring some votes:
neuronics
delegate.robrigo
jcalfee1-developer-team.helper.liondani
delegate-clayop
moon.warlock
bitfeeds.chsln
delegate.trev
Thanks for including me on your list!
I've started my delegate mainly for the same reasons as you did.
3
General Discussion / Re: What is BitShares?
« on: December 18, 2014, 04:45:26 pm »http://bytemaster.github.io/update/2014/12/18/What-is-BitShares.html
Answering the question “What is BitShares?” has been one of the most difficult challenges I have faced. BitShares is so many things to different people and there are a thousand different ways of understanding what BitShares is. This post will tell you what BitShares is to me, its founder. Before getting into the long-answer to this question, let me give you the executive summary. BitShares is one of the most important tools that any community can use to secure their freedom; an idea whose time has come. After reading this post I bet you will agree.
Very nice!!
4
Italiano (Italian) / Re: Promozione libro Bitshares
« on: December 18, 2014, 01:43:30 pm »
Bella lì!
5
General Discussion / Re: Network problem?
« on: December 17, 2014, 08:47:27 am »Red alert! Call the developers!
"blockchain_head_block_num": 1283231,
"blockchain_head_block_age": "6 seconds old",
"blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-12-17T08:05:50",
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "33.33 %",
dnotestein is already on it.
I was worried it was as bad as last time but it doesn't seems like
6
General Discussion / Re: Network problem?
« on: December 17, 2014, 08:05:12 am »
Red alert! Call the developers!
"blockchain_head_block_num": 1283231,
"blockchain_head_block_age": "6 seconds old",
"blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-12-17T08:05:50",
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "33.33 %",
"blockchain_head_block_num": 1283231,
"blockchain_head_block_age": "6 seconds old",
"blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-12-17T08:05:50",
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "33.33 %",
7
General Discussion / Re: Seems we are in a fork again
« on: December 17, 2014, 07:54:21 am »
What's going on again? 
8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: New Delegate bitfeeds.chsln
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:51:43 pm »Are you considering publishing slate? I think you enjoy cutting-edge things, so you may like it
I will look into it!
I still have to do my homework on the topic.
9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: All delegates just missed about 10 blocks simultaneously
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:35:20 pm »
I'm waiting official update
But I'm not yet in the top 101 so it doesn't really matter for me at the moment
But I'm not yet in the top 101 so it doesn't really matter for me at the moment
10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: All delegates just missed about 10 blocks simultaneously
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:05:16 pm »
Probably the same issue that caused the freeze today occurred again.
But now there are 4 delegates running the new client with the fix.
Delegates with the old client can't sign blocks with the issue but those 4 delegates can.
That means that when a block with duplicate transaction appear each delegate but those 4 will miss it.
But now there are 4 delegates running the new client with the fix.
Delegates with the old client can't sign blocks with the issue but those 4 delegates can.
That means that when a block with duplicate transaction appear each delegate but those 4 will miss it.
11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: New Delegate bitfeeds.chsln
« on: December 15, 2014, 09:58:07 pm »
Thanks!
12
Stakeholder Proposals / New Delegate bitfeeds.chsln
« on: December 15, 2014, 02:12:36 pm »
Hi all,
I've created a 3% pay delegate
It's a simple delegate, already up and running publishing feeds.
I'm from Italy and the server is a VPS located in the Netherlands with 2GB RAM running on Ubuntu.
I decided to start a delegate to help decentralizing the network and provide feeds.
I'll use the pay collected to maintain the server running, if anything left i will burn it.
If you think that my delegate is useful for BitShares please approve it!
Cheers.
I've created a 3% pay delegate
It's a simple delegate, already up and running publishing feeds.
I'm from Italy and the server is a VPS located in the Netherlands with 2GB RAM running on Ubuntu.
I decided to start a delegate to help decentralizing the network and provide feeds.
I'll use the pay collected to maintain the server running, if anything left i will burn it.
If you think that my delegate is useful for BitShares please approve it!
Cheers.
13
General Discussion / Re: Network issues
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:32:43 am »If all delegates were on the same fork, it would be 100% participation - obviously some delegates are on a different fork(s).
I don't think it's a fork, it looks like it's much worse than that, my (wild, uninformed) guess is that the network is completely stalled because someone published a transaction which is now invalid according to the new rules, and no delegate is able to include it in a block and sign it (as all of them are on 0.4.26).
Two are on v0.4.25, three are on a mysteriously named 0.4.26 (with missing v) and the other 96 are on v0.4.26
0.4.26 without v it's fine - they update version field manually.
They shouldn't do that though, it means we can't tell if they've compiled the incorrect version for example.
It shouldn't be allowed to publish version manually...
14
General Discussion / Re: Network issues
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:16:47 am »
what about downgrading to v 0.4.25-RC2 again?
15
General Discussion / Re: Network issues
« on: December 15, 2014, 10:06:46 am »I suppose exchanges have stop deposits and withdrawals , can somebody confirm?
I confirm Bter has stopped deposits and withdrawals
