Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Amazon

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 55
91
很好的建议! 谢谢。

好的设想和建议需要计划和执行。

执行的结果是衡量滞后标准,有风险。  但是我愿意花时间培养人才,也愿意承担风险。

数字资产的行业人才缺乏。需要的是跨界人才。好的DAC模式很多,我更愿意有机会帮助有愿景,能力和担当的有志青年成长。我们也会提供机会,你有多大能力, 就可以走多远。 市场,技术和运行。。。你的特长?你的兴趣?

给我留私信吧, 假如你愿意接受挑战!

 +5% +5% +5%

92
General Discussion / Upcoming Crowdsales on Mastercoin
« on: June 03, 2014, 07:05:32 pm »
http://wiki.mastercoin.org/index.php/Upcoming_Crowdsales

API Network - Decentralized API Marketplace

Issuing on the Master Protocol in June 18, 2014
[1] API Network

Decentralized Identity

Issuing on the Master Protocol in June 2014

Storj - Decentralized Data Storage

Issuing on the Master Protocol in July 15, 2014
[2] Storj

Coinvance - Decentralized Dapp Management

Issuing on the Master Protocol in July 2014.
[3] Coinvance

Zooz - Decentralized Transportation

Issuing on the Master Protocol in July 2014
[4] Zooz

Open Garden - Mesh Internet Access

Issuing on the Master Protocol in September 2014
[5] Open Garden

BlockAuth - Secure ID Information Multiple Signature

Issuing on the Master Protocol in a time frame that is TBD.
[6] Block Auth

Rivetz - Trusted Computing

Issuing on the Master Protocol in a time frame that is TBD.

Crypto Swartz

Issuing on the Master Protocol in a time frame that is TBD.

94
General Discussion / PoS Cryptocurrency wtih No Blockchain
« on: June 03, 2014, 04:46:15 pm »
Found this article about Proof of Consensus, which required a plurality of the network to sign each block, rather than attempting to find a new person to sign each block. Lot of similarity to DPOS. And the author referenced BM's TsPOS article.

http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/330.pdf

Any flaw in the design?

95
中文(Chinese) / Re: 科技是把双刃剑!DAC,你呢?
« on: June 03, 2014, 04:09:20 am »
Dac只解决一个基本问题(当然也不是完全解决),就是信任。信任无非善恶,善恶问题不是dac的责任范围,事实上任何手段都解决不了善恶问题,因为善恶没有统一的标准。所谓的恐怖分子也只是一群人(当然一般是大部分人)对另一部分人的强制定性。dac只是试图降低信任成本,如果成功就已足够。

来自我的 HUAWEI P6-C00 上的 Tapatalk

 +5% 每次看log的回复都很有启发

96
中文(Chinese) / Re: 科技是把双刃剑!DAC,你呢?
« on: June 03, 2014, 02:26:53 am »
我们都是第一代执剑人

97
中文(Chinese) / Re: 在我们这里,delegate如何翻译才更好
« on: June 03, 2014, 02:25:27 am »
+1 统称第一代执剑人

98
Warning yellowecho, you may disagree with omgomgomg. Personal attack like your post is not allowed in this forum.

99
解答完可爱的stan的问题我把这个贴锁起来了

如果还有疑问请移步 https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4835.0

100
中文(Chinese) / Re: 竞选专用帖
« on: June 03, 2014, 01:55:06 am »

法币的思想要不得啊  :P :P :P :P
1bts=1btc

那就1USD=1bips

太保守了都 敢不敢1bip=1btc

101
BTS,500刀妥妥的

Would somebody please explain this recurring Chinese expression to this poor American farm boy?

"500 knives properly properly"

Thanks!   :)

It is saying 1BTS = 500 dollars for sure. :)

102
I can imagine it is hard to integrate .p2p into the existing DNS system. Is it totally impossible? It will be a big plus if any browser out of box can get on to .p2p. I found this discussion from openDNS forum: http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=12233 Seems like it will never happen to integrate .bit or other alt DNS root into existing openDNS.

Another question, what if someone pay $100k to register .p2p 5 years later from today, do we need to move over to another one with so many domains already registered at that time? Maybe we should pay the fee and secure the spot?


103
No way, this is a strictly opt-out system. If someone spends the $100k to register the TLD we'll just pick another.

What does "strictly opt-out system" mean? I am not familiar with this. I thought since 2012 anyone can pay the fee and register a gTLD.

Do we always need to use a browser extension or proxy to surf .p2p, like what .bit is doing now?

104
Following up this topic, have we paid ICANN for the .p2p? Or do we have plan to do so?

105
中文(Chinese) / Re: 给沈波先生的建议
« on: June 02, 2014, 05:12:14 pm »
做好你自己的贡献再说,bitshares走到今天要感谢的何止这些人

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 55