Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - fav

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 286
looks like SPRING is going to start soon, can't wait to see how it goes

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 18, 2018, 02:33:29 pm »

You only buyback without burn? Does that mean you'll sell the bought back assets at a later stage?

General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 15, 2018, 07:23:27 pm »
Questions that arise in my head:
 - Why was it committee controlled in the first place, and why did no one care so far? How long has it been committee controlled?
 - Is the hero-foundation the rightful owner? Who controls that account?
 - The asset has "Issuer may transfer asset back to himself", with a supply of 932 at a BTS price of roughly 1000 BTS. Independent of why it was committee controlled, it has been created by users with thought of having a trust-worthy bitAsset

original issuer is hero-foundation, why they sent it over without a word - no idea.

I personally think the committee should not be held accountable for an asset that's vastly based on promises made by the centralized original issuer.

hero-foundation lists 3 keys, one is cryptonomex - no idea about the others

It is ready for grading, but later additions that are less integral to the lore correctness of this proposal are planned.

I don't understand what you are saying here, could you please elaborate?

It's a spam bot. I've been sending Fav PM's on Telegram but he has not removed it yet. :D

use the report link please

General Discussion / Re: SPRING fund
« on: July 14, 2018, 06:58:05 am »
got a tl;DR in english?

General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 14, 2018, 06:57:01 am »
Transferring an asset's ownership to committee-account doesn't mean the committee nor any witness is responsible to maintain it.

this. I have no interest in supporting HERO.

General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 13, 2018, 06:38:40 pm »
As an official bitAsset I agree that this needs to be advertised as it insinuates a level of confidence in the feed.

how was it declared "official"?

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 11, 2018, 05:33:22 pm »
voted for:

Alfredo needs some extra funds to cover the agreed payment, due to BTS value decline leading to less bitUSD to payout.

Hackthedex - it's escrowed and it's necessary to get some actual pentesting going on. if results are bad, I will remove my vote again.


Thank to all for the support, here in the forum and in telegram. The worker has now been created and is up for voting!

Voting for worker proposals: Votes can be done via the reference wallet. Visit Menu -> Votes -> Workers or enter your account name in the link

This worker proposal has id 1.14.108 and name 201807-infrastructure.


Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 04, 2018, 02:22:56 pm »
will be voting for infrastructure renewal worker

Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: June 30, 2018, 10:59:07 am »
voted for bitfest worker

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 286