Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fav

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 286
61
looks like SPRING is going to start soon, can't wait to see how it goes

62
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 18, 2018, 02:33:29 pm »

63
You only buyback without burn? Does that mean you'll sell the bought back assets at a later stage?

64
General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 15, 2018, 07:23:27 pm »
Questions that arise in my head:
 - Why was it committee controlled in the first place, and why did no one care so far? How long has it been committee controlled?
 - Is the hero-foundation the rightful owner? Who controls that account?
 - The asset has "Issuer may transfer asset back to himself", with a supply of 932 at a BTS price of roughly 1000 BTS. Independent of why it was committee controlled, it has been created by users with thought of having a trust-worthy bitAsset

original issuer is hero-foundation, why they sent it over without a word - no idea.

I personally think the committee should not be held accountable for an asset that's vastly based on promises made by the centralized original issuer.

hero-foundation https://cryptofresh.com/u/hero-foundation lists 3 keys, one is cryptonomex https://cryptofresh.com/u/cryptonomex - no idea about the others

65
Quote
It is ready for grading, but later additions that are less integral to the lore correctness of this proposal are planned.

I don't understand what you are saying here, could you please elaborate?

It's a spam bot. I've been sending Fav PM's on Telegram but he has not removed it yet. :D

use the report link please

66
General Discussion / Re: SPRING fund
« on: July 14, 2018, 06:58:05 am »
got a tl;DR in english?

67
General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 14, 2018, 06:57:01 am »
Transferring an asset's ownership to committee-account doesn't mean the committee nor any witness is responsible to maintain it.

this. I have no interest in supporting HERO.

68
General Discussion / Re: Internalizing the Hero
« on: July 13, 2018, 06:38:40 pm »
As an official bitAsset I agree that this needs to be advertised as it insinuates a level of confidence in the feed.

how was it declared "official"?

69
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 11, 2018, 05:33:22 pm »
voted for:



Alfredo needs some extra funds to cover the agreed payment, due to BTS value decline leading to less bitUSD to payout.

Hackthedex - it's escrowed and it's necessary to get some actual pentesting going on. if results are bad, I will remove my vote again.

70
+5%

72
Thank to all for the support, here in the forum and in telegram. The worker has now been created and is up for voting!

Voting for worker proposals: Votes can be done via the reference wallet. Visit Menu -> Votes -> Workers or enter your account name in the link https://wallet.bitshares.org/#/account/youraccountnamehere/voting

This worker proposal has id 1.14.108 and name 201807-infrastructure.

voted

73
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: July 04, 2018, 02:22:56 pm »
will be voting for infrastructure renewal worker https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26778.0

75
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: fav - Journal
« on: June 30, 2018, 10:59:07 am »
voted for bitfest worker

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 286