31
General Discussion / Re: Announcement on BSIP42 relevant actions
« on: October 14, 2018, 02:30:25 am »
Margin call is initiated by debt holders maintaining poor ratios; forced settlement is initiated by bitUSD equity holders.
The difference may be small to some but as I see it, if the ecosystem is well collateralized and there is no force settlement then it's possible that no user can get BTS autonomously. The only option is to trade it for BTS. Maybe that is the way of the future, but there will be a lot of old hodlers who will be suspicious that we are limiting choice.
Maybe this is just an unnecessary rabbit hole.. By "incentivize a run on bitUSD" I mean encourage a bank run where bitUSD is the bank. In crisis deposit holders want their money out of banks. When this happens at one time banks go bankrupt. So by a run on bitUSD I mean a scenario when users trade en masse to BTS and turn around and sell to another crypto like BTC. If BTS were to experience a chronic low price maybe it would not happen quite like this. Still thinking about it. To be honest I don't know exactly how it would play out.
The difference may be small to some but as I see it, if the ecosystem is well collateralized and there is no force settlement then it's possible that no user can get BTS autonomously. The only option is to trade it for BTS. Maybe that is the way of the future, but there will be a lot of old hodlers who will be suspicious that we are limiting choice.
Maybe this is just an unnecessary rabbit hole.. By "incentivize a run on bitUSD" I mean encourage a bank run where bitUSD is the bank. In crisis deposit holders want their money out of banks. When this happens at one time banks go bankrupt. So by a run on bitUSD I mean a scenario when users trade en masse to BTS and turn around and sell to another crypto like BTC. If BTS were to experience a chronic low price maybe it would not happen quite like this. Still thinking about it. To be honest I don't know exactly how it would play out.