Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bytemaster

Pages: 1 ... 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 [634] 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 ... 656
9496
please let me set a minimum payout amount.
atm i am getting 0.4PTS per payout... i'd prefer to get only a payout when i have 5PTS or more.

I send out a payout anytime the total balance I owe miners equals the number of connections.   In theory this should average 1 PTS per user.     When I do payouts I clear my books, but if anyone else thinks like you I can put a check in there for a minimum payout amount.

9497
I am going to setup a second pool...  this one has 823 connections and I suspect that increases the latency.

ok cool - sry don't want to bother you  but have another question ... is it better to use 1 different PTS payout address for each mininig device ... or doesn't it matter wether i use 1 PTS for 4 devices or not ?

If you want independent stats use different addresses, otherwise it doesn't matter to me.

9498
General Discussion / Re: $5000 Bounty - Momentum Proof-of-Work Hacking
« on: November 09, 2013, 11:57:36 pm »
I am looking for algorithmic weaknesses in the Momentum Proof of Work: http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=21.msg24#msg24 

If you can identify an alternative algorithm for solving the proof of work that does not require the target RAM and yet is able to find hashes at a rate greater than  MomentumAlgoHashRate / (TARGET_RAM_USE/ALT_RAM_USE)  then you could win this bounty.

For example:  Suppose momentum as specked requires about 1 GB of RAM for maximum performance and produces hashes at 1hz.   If you design an algorithm that only requires 1 MB of RAM and can find hashes at .001 hz then you win because you will have proven that computational complexity is linear with RAM use rather than non-linear like I believe the problem calls for.   
      I paid out a tip for showing this property doesn't quite hold as I thought, but this was more a weakness in my devising an effective / objective measure for determining whether or not momentum is "broken' or 'hacked'.

For the record, I did not receive any tip.

You are right... I owe you that tip... sorry I have been very busy  can you send me a BTC address.  Thanks

9499
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty.   Enjoy your increased revenue.

I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.

cool but if i look now i get more invalids and at the end the same revenue like before^^

None of my clients have increased the invalids...   in fact, since the last reset I have only had 1 invalid.

9500
I am going to setup a second pool...  this one has 823 connections and I suspect that increases the latency. 

9501
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty.   Enjoy your increased revenue.

I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.

9502
Wait a couple of hours.

9503
I installed Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3 and then it worked.
 

9504
I'm getting a constant 2.6:1 valid/invalid ratio...

Is anyone experiencing similar? Any recommendations on how to fix this?

I have been starting / stopping the server a lot... every time it connects you get 1 invalid, so I would discount that number slightly.

9505
the x64 windows miner isn't working  for me,  "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application."  tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64

IF someone could repost the fix to this so I don't have to search for it in the history, I would appreciate it... I will update the main topic once done.

9506
valid: 14  invalid: 9  balance: 0.358805  paid: 0  pps: 0.0256289  address: Ps
.........
This miner isn't working so well for me. I get tons of invalids and I often get this connection error which might play a part in my high invalids.

This is normal.  You will find it now being more stable.  Everytime payment is made there is a short glitch.  This will get better I believe.  I do not see your log abnormal.

You picked a bad time to look at it.. I just paid out a couple hundred PTS

So far the miner is relatively stable, the pool is undergoing many updates and bug fixes.... most of the bugs are costing me more money than you all because I continue to pay the PPS even though my protosharesd  server hung and stopped producing blocks for almost an hour... expensive bug for me :) 

Anyway, thanks for understanding.

9507
I get a payment, but only for amount which I get after auto payout was disabled.

Ok... Thanks for letting me know. 

9508
Hey everyone automatic payments have been turned off until I can put in place some more checks.

It has come to my attention that there may be a few cases of mismatch between the balance being reported as paid and what was actually received at your address.   If this is the case I should have unexpected profits in my wallet.  I will distribute these unexpected profits proportional to shares found once the alpha testing is over.  It is not perfect, but I don't want to profit from my bugs either.

Thank you all so much for your understanding and support as I am developing my pool... hopefully most issues will be resolved shortly and we can move on toward reliable operation.

9509
Can everyone confirm automatic payments working at 1 PTS?

According log it's works but I doesn't get a payments yet:
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 19.3831
  valid: 3947  invalid: 1312  balance: 0.589465  paid: 154.776  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 20.0841
sending 01396d5061564af001afcc564ef8a6e6e7bb5ab140f794eb4fc142aa4c1ce3e1
  valid: 3957  invalid: 1313  balance: 0.845754  paid: 154.776  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 20.558
  valid: 3958  invalid: 1313  balance: 0.871383  paid: 154.776  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 20.2847
sending 03fe405eac901e4f01b2682e60137c2e55c884fcfcb0c36e2dcde47c6c3f2789
  valid: 3984  invalid: 1314  balance: 0.512578  paid: 155.801  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 20.6012
sending 00cb414d72bb8feaaed8242fa93f4aefeac1f86373d72d981f3838b6c0582fa1
  valid: 3998  invalid: 1314  balance: 0.871383  paid: 155.801  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 20.9936
sending 02c9d24710b10c0ff0fa269e64e118ce5ec7e7418e92b60bbd1ac51f8f73f847
  valid: 4052  invalid: 1314  balance: 0.205031  paid: 157.851  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 19.7402
sending 014b59778777174700fca7826009b442313059c4496ecf61a36d671ee55d7ab5
  valid: 4112  invalid: 1314  balance: 0.717609  paid: 158.876  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 18.3174
sending 006c9abd7aedd84816ba8a6dc32fb5c49f949d7ebe51f54ab0d424c8e31a0479
  valid: 4168  invalid: 1314  balance: 0.102516  paid: 160.927  pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs  hpm: 18.3427

Let me know when the payments come in (or not)... I disabled auto pay until we have more info.

9510
That would be due to lack of memory?

i don't know new installed droplet on DO (2Gb/2CPU) its just went fine in past .. but now i get this error ... strange...

If other things are running on the droplet it could be an issue...

Pages: 1 ... 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 [634] 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 ... 656